1434:)I do believe there's quite enough independent Taiwan articles abound on Knowledge for those opposed so that the PRC's belief that Taiwan was never supposed to have separated could have its own stake on the internet. And this article itself is already riddled with sarcasm and dissenting voices that it barely holds true to its intention anyway. We have an article about Taiwan under the ROC and we have an article of Taiwan just as a piece of Earth. Do we really need to be arguing more about this? Taiwan under the ROC is there. If somebody doesn't want to accept that, that's their problem, no? So, what is this blather about this article's legitimacy? Its purpose is to serve as a footnote regarding what China, the PRC, basically the former/present sovereign of Taiwan, depending on viewpoints, believes.
1126:~~I'm of the opinion, the only neutral view is the facts. In terms of land, you'd have to go with historical facts as any word of mouth or verbal claim will only result in bias. Therefore, as known throughout history, Taiwan is the island known by the western identity of Formosa. I'm not sure, but I believe it was derived from Portugese. Formosa has a native populous of Taiwanese "Hakka" persons, but have, since the defeat of the ROC in 1949, also sheltered the refugees of the fallen party. Two outcomes drew from this event: One being that of the Chinese in the mainland which believes the ROC and the natives are and have always been part of China. One nation. The other outcome, that of the ROC and later the Democratic Progressive Party, believing that since 1949, Taiwan had become a sovereign state.
1468:
article observes NPOV by presenting the facts that are undisputed. It doesn't try to judge whether Taiwan is part of some large "China". It doesn't try to judge whether PRC claims to Taiwan are legitimate. It reports that the governing structures the PRC have set up for Taiwan don't govern anything and that the PRC doesn't actually control Taiwan. This is quite different from your examples of regions the PRC presides over but relinquishes direct control over. The PRC has never had any direct control over Taiwan that it could relinquish. Even the PRC's point of view recognizes this. When they refer to Taiwan's "local authorities", they mean the ROC government, not the "Taiwan
Province, People's Republic of China" structures the PRC has set up.
3638:
3598:
3607:
3627:
830:
is answered) is very clear about the nature of this theoretical administration, then I don't think there is a problem. The need for this page comes from the PRC using the term in various settings to push their agenda. Someone seeing the term "Taiwan
Province, People's Republic of China" will want to know what it is, and it makes sense to have this page to tell them. As for Soman's suggestion that we include more information about how the PRC stages the pretend government, that sounds like good information to include as the body of the article.
3618:
31:
3647:
3587:
812:, for various reasons. First of all, both Chinese governments (PRC and ROC) claim Taiwan as part of China. Moreover, there are several other articles on the Taiwan question in general. What this article would need is rather an expansion. How does the provincial administration 'in exile' function? Does it have a governing body? Who are the people at its helm? --
2826:
province, ROC" and "Fujian province, PRC" can arguably be said to be co-existing and separate concepts. But the PRC has not set up a government of Taiwan, it does not maintain a "reserve" governor for Taiwan, and any statutory reference to Taiwan refers to it as a part of "China", which is consistent with and not contradictory to the ROC legal position.
1518:
in the article. Having an initial sentence that pretends that Taiwan is a just like Hunan or
Shandong, followed by a later sentence explaining difference, is insufficient. As I explained above, we wouldn't start an article on MacBeth with a first line that treats him as a real historical figure and only later explain that he was a fictional character.
582:
a delimitation is needed here, and perhaps the best would be to weed out large parts of the article. This article should deal with the actually existing institutional framework of the PRC province (how it's 'exile' apparatus functions, etc.), leaving the broader political discussion about PRC claims and cross-strait relations to other articles. --
1916:
China normally calls "Taiwan
Province" that focuses on the PRC, or do they just call it "China's Taiwan Province"? If the former, we should rename. If the latter, we should dump this page and just mention on the "Taiwan Province" page that the China maintains a faux administrative apparatus as a way to promote their claim.
1259:
to appease China. But there is no such province. There is a Taiwan
Province governed as part of the larger country Taiwan(formally "Republic of China"), but there is no Taiwan Province of the People's Republic of China other than the legal fiction that is their administrative apparatus that doesn't administer anything.
1059:~~AMERICAN MIGHT, you seem to like spinning things with biased politics. The DPP is a pro-separation party, one of the three well-knowns, in fact, and also has a well-known mention that its latest President was a public enemy of Taiwan. Now, with Ma Yinjiu, a member of the ROC, what say you? Your quote means nothing.
2901:
straight forward one - the PRC claims Taiwan province, and does not recognise the ROC's boundary changes, rather than the more elaborate construct that there is a separate Taiwan
Province of the PRC. If anyone does not agree, please read this thread in its entirety and respond with reliable sources. --
2881:
as part of China is sufficient. Any of the pre-1949 Taiwan province boundaries/admin. divisions are just history and can go into the history oof Taiwan/Taiwan provinnce, or history of ROC. I don't see how there's any importance of documenting these old divisions for the general public other than some
1864:
This article seems to basically cover two things: 1. the administrative sub-units of Taiwan
Province as recognised by the PRC, and 2. the provision for representation of Taiwan in China's parliament. Both topics are too small to make separate articles, and together they are rather incongruous (if you
1685:
Taiwan province currently administered by the ROC, but the precise borders of which it disputes. That is to say "Taiwan province ROC" and "Taiwan province PRC" are not two separate concepts. They are a single concept, "Taiwan province", which is currently administered by the ROC, and which 1. the PRC
1463:
What independent Taiwan articles do you speak of? None of them are able to treat Taiwan as the independent nation it is. Instead, they follow NPOV and either don't dispute the claim that Taiwan is part of China or they provide both points of view. There are quite a few articles that go too far the
1258:
The reason for this article is that in some circumstances the phrase "Taiwan
Province, People's Republic of China" will appear either as an attempt by China to cause a belief to be instilled by repeated usage of a phrase (see "A lie repeated often enough comes to be seen as truth") or out of a desire
921:
There are some basic confusions here. To call Taiwan 'a country' is incorrect. There is no 'Republic of Taiwan', there is a
Republic of China which claims Taiwan as one of its provinces. Both ROC and PRC claim to be the legitimate government of all of China, the PRC claims over Taiwan are by no means
829:
Presumably people don't come to the page just to read the title. They at least read the first sentence to answer the question "What is Taiwan
Province, People's Republic of China?" So as long as the first complete thought of the first line (that is, up until the point someone may think the question
3764:
Since the PRC does not recognise the ROC as legitimate, PRC government and media refers to some ROC government offices and institutions using generic description which does not imply endorsement of the ROC's claim to be a legitimate government of either Taiwan or China. The precise replacements used
2825:
Where government A claims territory X actually controlled by government B, that does not automatically mean there are thus two separate and distinct Xs. The situation is different if government A actually has made provisions for a separate administrative infrastructure for territory X - thus "Fujian
2085:
What is this "faux administrative apparatus" of which you speak? There is no governor-in-pretence or county chiefs-in-waiting. The so-called "Taiwan representatives" in parliament don't even pretend to represent the interests of the residents of Taiwan Province, but rather the interests of people of
1934:
I have never heard the PRC officially calling Taiwan "Taiwan Province of the People's Republic of China" or "Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China" in the last decade. Sometimes, I still hear the PRC calling Taiwan "China's Taiwan", "Taiwan, China", "China's Taiwan province" or "China's Taiwan
1752:
The way I see the concepts, the hawkish members of the CPC would like to see "Taiwan Province" become ruled by the PRC, but this is the same Taiwan Province currently ruled by the ROC. You may quibble about my "unease" if you like, but the current scheme seems to me to mis-represent the situation as
1517:
The very title of the article carries a very strong implication that Taiwan is a province of the People's Republic of China. The title is very un-NPOV, not surprising since the whole thing was set up by the PRC for propaganda purposes, and it is important to balance that problem as soon as possible
730:
I happened to press 'Enter' a bit to soon before my last edit summary was completed. I removed the 'Terminology' section, since it fits better in overall articles of the political status of Taiwan. This article should be limited to the institutional framework of the PRC provincial administration 'in
581:
Again, this is not fiction. The province exists in the administrative apparatus of the PRC, it sends delegates to the People's Congress, etc.. Thus wordings like 'theoretical' are unsuitable. Other wordings in the lead are quite clear on that the PRC has no control at all over the territory. I think
2658:
The politics of the Taiwan issue is another matter. The subject is the 'Taiwan Province', which has a real-life existence within the administrative framework of the PRC. The PRC has a provincial administration in 'exile' for the province in question. The opening sentence clearly states that PRC has
2420:
Even after the reference is found, there needs to be some balance. For example, wouldn't Taiwan's government (ROC) have to give up its ability to engage in independent foreign relations as a sovereign nation? Wouldn't Taiwan lose any claim to foreign help should the PRC reneg on it's promises and
1723:
As for being "uneasy", I'm uneasy with an awful lot of stuff in Knowledge. But you have to deal with things the way they are, not the way you wish they were. Taiwan Province, ROC is a real thing with a functioning government that exercises power, while Taiwan Province, PRC is something some people
1501:
I think these phrases are over-emphasising and I think that's why some people think that they are sarcastic phrases. Why can't we just state the facts as is and have a statement saying "claimed province.............. has no control". I think that's pretty clear to anyone who reads the sentence that
1030:
This is of course something many inhabitants of Taiwan would dispute. If a future DPP government (please note that elections were held, in which DPP were defeated) would declare a 'Republic of Taiwan', then we would have to deal with that issue. For now, ROC is the only political unit with de facto
999:
On September 30, 2007, the ruling Democratic Progressive Party approved a resolution asserting separate identity from China and called for the enactment of a new constitution for a "normal country". It also called for general use of "Taiwan" as the island's name, without abolishing its formal name,
2853:
My understanding of the reason for this page's existence was that the claims made by China that such a province existed could send someone looking for information about this mythical place. I think you make a fair point that usage of the term was ever demonstrated. A google search turned up only
1531:
I can understand the hesitation to use current wording "theoretical" because the meaning is not precise as we would like. We should look at alternative words but we need to find something that fits into the first clause of the first sentence rather than something that only appears as a follow on.
1336:
One more thing. It is like the Mainland Area of the Republic of China. Mainland China is claimed by the ROC but the ROC does not have any control over it. I wouldn't call the "Mainland Area of the ROC" a "theoretical Area of the ROC". It is legally a "claimed area of the ROC". The ROC just doesn't
298:
This article describes something real; it describes the structures in place in China to support their claim that Taiwan is a province of China. There are real people whose job is to attend National People's Congress meetings as "representatives" of Taiwan. Even though these people are just going
1915:
I did a Google search on "中华人民共和国台湾省" and only came up with about 9000 hits, with none of the earliest ones having Xinhua or PRC gov addresses. "Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China" came up with less than 700 hits. Before merging, perhaps we should consider a rename. Is there name that
1388:
Again, having the fictional (better word?) nature of this entity that exists on paper front and center is important. Perhaps we should restructure the opening to not follow the standard "XXX is..." that most articles use. "Although the PRC has never controlled Taiwan, it has created a governing
1226:
We need this article because Taiwan is commonly recognised, acknowledged etc to be part of China. I don't think we need to say if this POV is right or wrong but there is enough public interest for this article to be there. But I totally accept that we need to point out that the PRC has no control
606:
fiction, that is to say, something having to do with laws and government. The article is not about "Taiwan Province, mainland China"; the article is about "Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China". The NPOV may not be an issue because the map doesn't say whether Taiwan is part of the PRC or
1437:
Besides, at least the PRC has its autonomous regions that retain minority culture and self-government. Hong Kong still has its own governing body, which then judging from the argument that PRC has no control over Taiwan's affairs, would still not discount its assumed sovereignty over it. The PRC
1401:
That the PRC doesn't control Taiwan, and that the "governing structure" for "Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China" doesn't actually govern are indisputable. That a "governing structure" does not govern and has never governed is not only key information, it is information that needs to be
1351:
At this point in time I would call the "mainland area of the ROC" mostly theoretical ("mostly" only because Taiwan does control Kinmen and Matsu which are often considered part of mainland China). I'm not sure the history of the term, but an article on the Mainland Area of the ROC might be on a
1196:
While legitimacy of the PRC's claim to Taiwan is greatly disputed, the PRC's control of Taiwan is not. The "administrative" nature of "Taiwan Province, Republic of China" has as much credibility as the flat-earth society. The key attribute of this "administrative province" is that it exists to
1467:
Regardless of whether there are articles that say Taiwan is part of China, NPOV is supposed to be observed in each article. If other articles need to be fixed you can attempt to do so, but the failures of other articles to observer NPOV doesn't mean that this article should fail as well. This
1200:
The very existence of this article is borderline POV. The only reason for its existence is so that when someone stumbles across "Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China" they can look it up and find out what it is and not be confused by the natural tendency to believe that something called
2821:
Aside from other issues, his article is based on what seems to be a novel and controversial conception that somehow the PRC conceptualises a "Taiwan Province, PRC" which is separate and distinct from the "Taiwan Province" under the ROC. The article does not provide sufficient evidence to judge
1222:
Thats why I proposed "claimed province". I didn't say administrative, because seriously, what administrative when the PRC doesn't any control? "Administrative" is definitely the wrong word here. I thought my proposed sentence was pretty clear already: the PRC claims Taiwan as a province but it
2900:
Right. Several years later, I have been bold and recast the article to get rid of the OR that there are two Taiwan Provinces. The intervening years have not improved at all the basis of support for that notion. In the absence of support, we must conclude that the correct situation is the more
2829:
The position is not well described as "the ROC has a Taiwan province and the PRC has an imaginery Taiwan province which does not include the boundary changes post-1949". The better description (which does not require a leap of imagination) is that "the PRC claims the ROC's Taiwan province and
1295:
This I agree. I should have qualified my statement at first place. Sorry. I can accept your argument that this can be a redirect page to the "Taiwan Province" page then just we simply just talk about PRC's claim, like what we have done in the "Taiwan" article. But I don't believe the proposed
1207:
I'm not completely satisfied with the word "theoretical", but "fictional" didn't work because the structure actually exists even if it doesn't actually administer anything. It is used here as a way of contrasting "theory" and "practice". "In theory" the structure administers Taiwan, but "in
2109:
I totally disagree with the merger proposal. The 2 separate articles one for each side namely PRC Taiwan Province and Taiwan Province ROC as it stands is perfect. The reasoning is PRC claims Taiwan as a province, therefore it should have an wiki article to indicate its claim and its notional
1600:
One such Knowledge fork is Wikinfo, whose major difference from Knowledge is, in fact, its approach to content forks: multiple articles covering a subject from different POVs are actually preferred to Knowledge's goal of a single article covering the subject from the neutral point of view.
242:
The PRC claims the ROC as being part of its territory, so it seems correct to have articles describing those claims. This one describes how the PRC subdivides part of the ROC. Similarly, Japanese subdivisions of claims of Russian-controlled areas are described (although very briefly) at
1526:"governing structure in exile" is defined by M-W as "the state or a period of forced absence from one's country or home b: the state or a period of voluntary absence from one's country or home" and the administrative structure in the PRC cannot actually call Taiwan it's "country or home".
1373:
The problem I have with the word theoretical is it is an ambiguous word: "What theory is that?" That's why I just described it a "claimed province...... no control". The essence of my proposed statement was 1. it is claimed by the PRC and 2. the PRC has no control. What do you think of
1266:
begins "Gandalf is a fictional character that appears in the novels..." just as it should. It would wrong to start off "Gandalf was the leader of the Council of the Wise and trusted confidant of the kings of Rohan and Gondor..." and not mention that he is a fictional character until
328:. The separate Taiwan, ROC and Taiwan, PRC articles are NPOV in that they both describe government structures and what affect those structures actually have. Merging the two would suggest that they have something in common when they have little in common beyond their names.
2801:
appears to suggest that the PRC government has recognized the cities' mergers. I'd like some further discussion on this. If I hear no objections, I plan to link this map and write a paragraph suggesting that the PRC position is no longer "16 counties and seven cities."
1680:
I've always been a bit uneasy about the conception of this article. The PRC does not have a "government-in-exile" for Taiwan, nor, in my view, does it claim a "Taiwan province" that is conceptually distinct from the Taiwan province of the ROC. Instead, what it claims is
2619:) so we don't need a fourth one. If the subject are the claims of the PRC over Taiwan, then we need to rename the article. But again, these claims are already fully documented in the other three articles, so there would be no point having a separate article for it.
1171:"Taiwan Province of the People's Republic of China (simplified Chinese: 台湾省; traditional Chinese: 臺灣省 or 台灣省; pinyin: Táiwān shěng) is a theoretical administrative province of the People's Republic of China (PRC), covering an area over which the PRC has no control."
1605:
Both of your suggestions start with "Taiwan Province of the People's Republic of China refers to a claimed province of the People's Republic of China (PRC)". This is problematic as it says Taiwan is "of the People's Republic of China" with is the very subject of
365:
Are the books in the "further reading" specific enough to the topic of China's supposed province to be listed here? Based on their names they seem to be about the general relationship between Taiwan and China, not the specific aspect that is the topic of this
2830:
moreover claims the ROC's boundary changes post-1949 have not been effective". The two might be more or less logically equivalent in a philosophical sense, but the latter is descriptive of facts while the former is the result of somewhat fanciful deduction.
150:
Similarly, there are plenty of disclaimers all over articles about Taiwan and the Republic of China etc, that indicate the PRC claims them. This article is simply redundant. Itis not necessary for this article to be merged, it should simply be deleted.
1712:
I'm not sure what the unease is about. The article doesn't say "government-in-exile", although the thirteen delegates elected to the National People's Congress are certainly close to that. They are in exile from Taiwan and they are representatives to
3270:
I have corrected the list of epithets used by the PRC for officials and government bodies. An examination of the sources will show that these epithets are intended as descriptions, rather than invented, substituted names. They are used uncapitalised.
2633:
I agree with Laurent. These issues are already fully outlined in the other articles. Readers can be redirected to those sections. The unmerged version only serves the purpose of separating the issue to show PRC's view, ignoring the situation as a
2659:
no control of the area that is claimed as part of the province in question. This is not the only case were there are governments-in-exile. That an article on the subject exists doesn't mean that Knowledge takes sides regarding recognition. --
1175:
Theoretical? What theory is that? Constitutional legal theory? International legal theory? I think the sentence is pretty clear already that it is a province within the claimed territory of the PRC that it has no control over. So I propose:-
320:, I believe that would be confusing. This article describes something that happens in the PRC. It really has very little to do with either Taiwan the island, Taiwan the nation, or Taiwan the province administered by the ROC, just as the
3003:
section is pure speculation. Does the PRC even have laws regulating the local administrative divisions of Taiwan? If not, than that section has to be deleted. If that section is deleted, then I think this could easily be merged with the
1553:"The very title of the article carries a very strong implication that Taiwan is a province of the People's Republic of China. The title is very un-NPOV, not surprising since the whole thing was set up by the PRC for propaganda purposes"
902:
imperialist claims. Since some reliable sources will claim Taiwan is a province of China, we can't just ignore the Chinese imperialist editors who want to insist that we not call the claim "fiction" no matter how accurate the term is.
93:
This is a term not an actual entity. It is a political term used by the PRC and should be described as a specific term used by the PRC. Everything else is overlapping with other articles and if you have issues with that, please see
3710:
I don't understand the purpose of such images. They seem at best decorative, at worst misleading. If there must be a photo, and I'm not sure there must, a photo of the province's representation in the NPC would make far more sense.
1930:
Taiwan is officially known to the PRC as "Taiwan province", but nowadays it is much more common for the PRC to call Taiwan "Taiwan Area" or less frequently just simply "Taiwan" in mass media as well as in official statements and
565:
province of the PRC" because the PRC does not in fact "administer" the area it is claiming as "Taiwan Province". Since the PRC has no control over Taiwan, Taiwan is a province of the PRC only in theory, not in established fact.
2375:
It's a statement by Deng Xao Ping. That was his offer to Taiwan if Taiwan would reunify with the mainland on the basis of One Country Two Systems. I am busy right now but I will find the reference later. It is a very well known
2833:
Of more concern is that the article claims that the PRC actively "uses" the term "Taiwan Province, PRC" without supplying real evidence of such use. It would seem that the concept being described here is at best an original
2039:
In the sense that it is an integral part of the administrative of the most populous state in the world. For the record, I also find the now defunct ROC provincial administrations-in-exile representing the mainland notable.
2123:
Having separate articles may not be the best option politically by some people but it describes the situation very well and it should be left at that. There are two different notions of Taiwan province on each side of the
1558:
Well, I don't think about this article from a propaganda point of view. I believe the PRC is entitled to have an article to state their POV, although this POV has to be balanced by others. Let me show you another example,
1270:
If the article is not about the administrative structure set up by the PRC, but is really about the land and the people that the PRC claims to govern, then this should not be a separate article but should redirect to the
1397:
is and administrative division of the PRC governing Taiwan. In practice, the PRC has never controlled Taiwan and the structures are propaganda tools for reinforcing the PRC's claims to be the legitimate government of
1197:
promote a fiction that the PRC rules Taiwan (and even the PRC doesn't believe that fiction because when they refer to the "Taiwan authorities" they're referring to the ROC, not to their own administrative structure).
3522:
Are you asking what people think about adding images or what people think about adding images copied from an unrelated article with a similar name or what people think about the specific images you’ve copied over?
3294:
article anyway), and the area of the province as claimed (which cannot). I suggest the panel can be deleted in its entirety, if the area is worth keeping, it can be inserted into the section discussing boundaries.
1366:
It was just China. The division of the ROC into the Mainland Area and the Taiwan Area was done by Lee. There were some divisions within mainland China during WWII. But there was no such thing as "Mainland Area" in
219:. The PRC has never set foot in Taiwan. Therefore, it is completely illegitimate and unreasonable to have a "Taiwan Province, PRC" when it doesn't exist. It is only a fantasy made up by the Communist government.
143:
I agree that there is no reason for this article to exist. Knowledge may as well have articles titled "California, Mexico" or "Texas, Mexico" since some Mexicans claim that these areas should be part of Mexico.
1062:
Also, sovereignty, even established and accepted sovereigns, has been challenged before. Hawaii? So, noting that the ROC had claimed to be the sovereign entity of Taiwan does not make it the end of the subject.
3073:
The section "Politically Designated Names," while very interesting in its own right, doesn't seem to really belong to this article. It doesn't deal with the PRC government of Taiwan Province, but rather with
4036:
3891:
1753:
if there were two conceptual entities, one "Taiwan Province, PRC", and one "Taiwan Province, ROC", when in reality it is the same conceptual entity the ownership (to use a loose term) of which is contested.
946:
Taiwan is a country. The Republic of China is a state. The Taiwanese might hold a constitutional convention or even stage a coup to get rid of the "Republic of China", but they will still remain the same
1523:
I guess I can see the objections to "on paper" and "governing structure in exile". "on paper" is probably too strong because there are real people off paper whose job it is to pretend to represent Taiwan.
3734:
3677:
3560:
3532:
2440:
2356:
instituted by the National People's Congress of PRC stipulate that "After the country is reunified peacefully, Taiwan may practice systems different from those on the mainland and enjoy a high degree of
2938:" and those in blue represent areas claimed but not controlled by the "PRC", then the whole map should be in blue. The "Taiwan Province" as imagined by the "PR China" is completely under control of the
2089:
Sure, the fact that the PRC claims Taiwan Province or that the ROC still maintains the Committee for Mongolian and Tibetan affairs is *interesting*, but it is not notable like an actual province is. --
602:
The caption of the map has switched back and forth between saying "mainland China" and "People's Republic of China". I believe the latter term is more appropriate here because we are talking about a
898:
Knowledge's standard is published supposedly-reliable sources, not truth. While the truth may be obvious here, China has successfully pressured many otherwise reliable sources into accepting her
3124:
1093:
decided to remove both tags. If you were to take a look at his user page you could clearly tell that he is from china. Which makes me think he is not staying with wikipedia's neutral pov policy.
1776:", talking about Greek claims to it, any differences in Greek definition of it, and how the Greeks would like to see it displayed one day? That would not make sense. It makes more sense to have
2752:
Why does what the ROC gov't did matter, since this is the PRC article? How is it outdated? Just because the ROC does something has no bearing on the PRC administrative construction of Taiwan.
80:
I see no reason why this should be a seperate page other than someone wanting to make a political point; surely the situation would be made clearer to a reader by including it within the
2773:
It would ignore the ROC cities' mergers (in which case the article is not per se outdated, but a sentence should probably be added to reflect that it was ignoring the ROC's position); or
2776:
It would acknowledge the mergers and recast the four new cities in the same way that it had semi-recognized the promotions of Taipei and Kaohsiung by altering their geographic areas?
3682:
I mean, these are all famous places located with the PRC's claim, and they are coincidentally also located in the territory that the ROC currently controls, so I don't see why not.
3031:
is also shown in the same map and label as part of the map of Taiwan from the Taiwan Affairs Office. I am going to hide that section for now until more information is available. —
881:
You can't say that a country is in theory under the rule of another country when it clearly is not, but actually an established sovereign country with its own national government.
258:
Agree with Stefan2, this article is not about Taiwan, it is about what the PRC claims being part of its territory. Whether or not PRC actually control the province is irrelevant.
2590:
Sorry for being absent from the discussion. The article isn't a fork, it deals with a specific subject that is notable enough to have its own article. I'm reverting the merge. --
1720:
article, is an administrative division for governing. The governments of the ROC and PRC are certainly distinct even if some may argue that the countries they represent are not.
1620:
is an area claimed but never controlled by the People's Republic of China. It is currently governed by the Republic of China." would be a better start and more in line with the
1569:"Taiwan Province of the People's Republic of China refers to a claimed province of the People's Republic of China (PRC) covering an area administered by the Republic of China"
1566:"Taiwan Province of the People's Republic of China refers to a claimed province of the People's Republic of China (PRC) covering an area over which the PRC has no control"; or
17:
3399:. Given the rather unusual circumstances (another country claiming a de facto independent country as one of its own provinces), the proposed name would look very weird. --
4003:
3858:
3691:
3574:
3546:
3504:
47:
2352:
will be established in Taiwan. In this case, the government of PRC may not station its garrison in Taiwan, and the government of Taiwan may preserve its garrison. The
2056:
If its notability stems entirely from being part of something else, then perhaps the information about that faux administration should be merged into the PRC article.
3992:
766:
I still think that we should change the name of the article itself, Because it still makes me and maybe others that it sill is the property of the PRC not the Roc.
299:
through the motions, they are in fact going through the motions and those motions are referred to by the PRC government frequently enough to make an article useful.
154:
Quite frankly I can't see why it wasn't simply deleted when first put up. It also sets a very poor precedent for other Wiki articles about other places in dispute.
1108:
you are from the US, Which makes me think you are not staying with wikipedia's neutral pov policy considering the political inclinations of your country of origin
3346:
3214:
3210:
3196:
1131:
I think, if it was stated this way, there should be no dispute as this is all fact and you can argue against the facts all you'd like, but that won't change them.
3047:
Looking at government websites and concluding that what is displayed there must be the official borders of Taiwan Province of the People's Republic of China is
607:
not. The map may be interpreted either way. Perhaps the caption should say "Taiwan in relation to areas under the control of the People's Republic of China".
3372:
3146:
3082:. I cleaned up the English and clarified a few points as much as I could, but I didn't want to move this to another article on my own without asking first.
3000:
2770:
It's precisely this that the article may be outdated. The question is this — and I have insufficient information to answer this myself: is the PRC position:
2253:
2215:
400:
The term used in most press releases and statements is to refer to the ROC as a "local authority". An example of the PRC view towards the ROC can be found in
3869:
3027:
does not recognize Taipei, Kaohsiung, Taichung, Tainan and, New Taipei as Municipalities it only recognize Taiwan as a province. Also notice how part of the
2340:", the government of PRC advocates that if the mainland China and Taiwan are reunified, the "administrative region" which has more autonomous power than the
2009:
I oppose a merger. The PRC province structure has an administrative apparatus (albeit without territorial control), and is definately notable of its own. --
2283:, and not as a country. We can't just leave it in 5 different articles, as I think that would be much more confusing than discussing it in a long article.
1967:
It sounds like we should put the information in the Taiwan Province page. I've added a "merge" tag to the article to see if anyone else wants to discuss.
275:
No one said the PRC isn't claiming Taiwan as being part of it. But having this article as its own is not appropriate. The claim should be mentioned in the
2721:
It's outdated because, if the PRC has taken any official positions on whether it will "update" its view of Taiwanese administrative divisions in light of
1746:, to me, something conceptually separate which "some people believe should exist, but doesn't". It doesn't exist, nor does anyone believe it should exist.
1872:" in the first place. The logical place for them to go would be under a section titled "PRC views on Taiwan Province" or "PRC claims on Taiwan Province".
1141:
Taiwan was part of China as a province until 1949 and its ownership has been disputed since, either staying a province or becoming a nation. —Preceding
1694:
be administered by the ROC, and which 2. the ROC says has the borders defined under its laws while the PRC says has the borders defined under its laws.
3597:
1483:
I dont' think there is any sarcasm in this article either. But I think the "theoretical administrative........ has no control" quite over emphasising.
247:. If someone in Mexico claims part of the USA, then I guess someone could write a page about that, as long as someone digs up the necessary sources. (
2266:
It is not important why people think we move it, but we must move it to reflect the legal status, not the agreed status, as Knowledge does not run by
481:(ROC). The People's Republic of China claims that Taiwan is part of China, that the PRC succeeded the ROC as the sole legitimate authority in all of
401:
2977:
2536:
PR China still claims the territory and runs an illegitimate shadow government in their country. The provinces are divided up on pre-1949 standards.
232:
political entity. It talks about nothing. I've been to Taiwan on bussiness. It's nothing like Red China. And I am not even Chinese, I am Russian. --
2519:
would make things confusing is a false argument. If the article was confusing then that would only be because the situation itself was confusing.
1204:
The fictional nature of the administration is at the core of the topic and should be front and center, not just part of a later descriptive clause.
3949:
3880:
3637:
1311:
3765:
are not officially designated, so the politically designated names for Taiwan have small variations across different source from within the PRC.
1953:
Another context I can think of is the UN which officially refers to Taiwan as "Taiwan, Province of China" (not "Taiwan, Province of the PRC"). --
3606:
1244:
No, it is not. It is primarily recognized as part of China in diplomatic circles. Otherwise it is commonly recognized as a separate country.
549:(ROC). The People's Republic of China claims that Taiwan is part of China, that the PRC succeeded the ROC as the sole legitimate authority in
4025:
3847:
2877:. Is there really any need to have an article on ssomething that doesn't EXIST? Other than stating that PRC claims Taiwan Province/the whole
2563:, as I agree this article was a POV fork and shouldn't have been created. The claims of the PRC over Taiwan are already fully documented in
1066:
As I noted just below, if we could just use the facts and not spin details with any politics, there shouldn't be an issue here. —Preceding
3902:
3814:
2301:
1935:
area". In other words, they have stopped using "PRC" when they talk about Taiwan. More information about this is at the PRC section of the
1796:
1464:
other way in claiming that Taiwan is part of China despite NPOV, but I haven't seen any survive for long saying Taiwan isn't part of China.
1109:
799:
4637:
3720:
3705:
3663:
3516:
3459:
3442:
3425:
3408:
3390:
3365:
3304:
3280:
3260:
3132:
3118:
3091:
3060:
3038:
3017:
2989:
2910:
2895:
2868:
2847:
2811:
2790:
2761:
2746:
2690:
2668:
2653:
2628:
2607:
Could you explain what the "specific subject" is according to you? If the subject is Taiwan then we already have three articles about it (
2599:
2584:
2553:
2477:
2452:
2430:
2410:
2385:
2369:
2305:
2231:
2205:
2190:
2165:
2150:
2133:
2098:
2065:
2049:
2034:
2018:
2004:
1990:
1976:
1962:
1948:
1925:
1910:
1859:
1833:
1808:
1733:
1706:
1647:
1633:
1583:
1541:
1511:
1477:
1453:
1411:
1383:
1361:
1346:
1323:
1305:
1284:
1253:
1236:
1217:
1188:
1154:
1117:
1102:
1079:
1044:
1009:
982:
956:
931:
912:
892:
857:
839:
821:
803:
740:
720:
691:
631:
616:
591:
575:
413:
394:
375:
337:
285:
267:
251:
236:
223:
205:
196:
175:
161:
88:
4226:
3330:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
1838:
I haven't seen "Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China" in official print from China. I think I would prefer to see something like "
1370:"Kinmen and Matsu" are commonly considered as part of the Taiwan Area, and they are definied to be within the Taiwan Area in law as well.
385:
I don't think I've ever read the PRC refering to the ROC as "provincial" authorities. Even doing so would give the ROC some legitimacy.
3803:
1445:
1427:
1146:
1071:
682:
On the other hand, this article isn't really about the claims, it is really about the fictional province. Anyone have any suggestions?
668:
that Taiwan is a province of the People's Republic's of China provinces. For the Taiwan Province that currently exists as ruled by the
3931:
3451:
3128:
3028:
2644:
1352:
little firmer ground because prior to 1949 the ROC did control the mainland area, but I don't know if that's what it was called then.
1272:
3579:
For the benefit of other users in this discussion, I will paste the images that are the subject of this discussion on the talk page:
3174:
1563:
is an internationally disputed claim, but the way it is stated is pretty NPOV. Similarly should we just start the article like this?
157:
Last time I checked The mexican governemnt does not still claim the SW USA. The PRC government claims Taiwan not just a few chinese.
4076:
2753:
679:
I'm not real happy with either. The first suggests that the province really exists. But it doesn't. Taiwan Province, ROC exists.
622:
A better caption would be "Areas claimed by PRC as its Taiwan Province". That relates better to the core subject of the article. --
4094:
3967:
2113:
The Taiwan Province ROC wiki article as it stands for who is ACTUALLY (physically} administering the province which is the ROC.
1292:"It is primarily recognized as part of China in diplomatic circles. Otherwise it is commonly recognized as a separate country."
3290:
The side panel contains almost no useful information, except perhaps for the various pronunciations (which can be found in the
2650:
1031:
rule over Taiwan. Saying that China's claim over Taiwan (be it PRC or ROC) are 'imperialist' is like calling Spanish claims on
2116:
If you merge the articles, you politicize the content and it becomes a controversial issue for others to vandalize and create
2999:
The Taiwan Affairs Office seems to recognize the existing (post-2010) local boundaries. It seems that all the content in the
1621:
1610:
1560:
508:
440:
2463:
The entire section is original research, and the spellings are incorrect! Someone needs to fix it, for intelligence's sake!
2712:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2341:
2323:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
872:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
500:
432:
356:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
118:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2934:
This map is simply wrong. If areas highlighted in yellow represent county-level divisions that are administrated by the "
2541:
1438:
presides over several regions it relinquishes direct control over, Taiwan would be viewed by them as nothing different.
1179:"...is a claimed province of the People's Republic of China (PRC), covering an area over which the PRC has no control."--
4552:"Political meeting to promote peaceful development of cross-Strait relations: Taiwan experts - Xinhua | English.news.cn"
1781:
3730:
3673:
3626:
3556:
3528:
3358:
1847:
700:
665:
646:
530:
462:
167:
This article is on a specific (perhaps hypothetical) administrative entity. If anything, it should be merged with the
3123:
It's kind of meaningless to even have a largest city in a fictional entity. I've updated the side-panel accordingly.
2854:
one hit for "Taiwan Province, PRC" or "Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China" and that one hit was on Facebook.
3779:
For some cases, where the name does not significantly imply sovereignty, the name remains the same, such as for the
561:
It seems to me that the second paragraph is superior. The first paragraph is wrong to say "Taiwan Province...is an
4065:
4054:
2883:
2508:
2025:
I disagree that the PRC's faux administrative apparatus is notable. In what way are you suggesting it is notable?
1936:
1792:
1601:
Knowledge's policy is that this practice is not a legitimate way for contributors to deal with a lack of consensus.
554:
486:
38:
3776:
has also imposed the same restrictions on its staff to prevent them from implying Taiwan as an independent state.
553:
upon its founding in 1949, and that the ROC currently in Taiwan is unrecognized by PRC and most of countries (see
3469:
3386:
3321:
1596:
263:
3213:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2925:
2278:
1876:
541:, as parts of its Taiwan Province. The PRC has never controlled any of this territory, which is currently under
473:, as parts of its Taiwan Province. The PRC has never controlled any of this territory, which is currently under
4014:
3781:
3300:
3276:
2906:
2843:
2337:
2297:
2094:
2000:
1958:
1906:
1855:
1804:
1702:
1098:
1005:
978:
888:
853:
795:
3617:
2673:
The PRC province and the ROC province are, politically, two separate entities. There are other cases, we have
1113:
171:
article has an article exclusively devoted to the administration and not cultural and geographical aspects.--
3716:
3114:
2891:
1824:
This would say we're talking about the term rather than the place (which is really what we're doing anyway).
1773:
1574:
Either sentence states both necessary facts: it is a claimed territory and the PRC has no control over it.--
1449:
1431:
1150:
1075:
973:
For prove that Taiwan is an Independent counntry just read this quote I got out of the Taiwan article.Below
190:
3913:
3726:
3669:
3552:
3524:
3500:
3455:
3353:
3075:
2640:
2549:
181:
2540:
That is all. Is there consensus to suitably merge this material? Or perhaps even rename and expand it as
1891:. But the two issues dealt with in this article does not seem to arise in either of those two situations.
1795:, or, seeing as this article deals mainly with the administrative subdivisions as recognised by the PRC,
4417:
3481:
3477:
3331:
3252:
3232:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
3220:
3079:
2757:
2624:
2580:
2274:
1769:
1136:
So, let's stop the finger pointing, "He's Chinese" "He's American", garbage and just tell it like it is.
4291:
3701:
3687:
3659:
3570:
3542:
3512:
2421:
begin to interfere in Taiwan's internal affairs? Deng made the offer - what was the response and why?
2141:
It shows the 2 conceptions of Taiwan, and can contribute to explain the international status of taiwan
1901:
are separate articles, but then both of them do exist, and neither pretends to administer the other. --
201:
I agree that this article should be just deleted as there are no such thing as "Taiwan Province, PRC".
3069:
Move section "Names Used for Taiwanese Officials" / "Politically Designated Names" to another article?
2882:
history student who may want it. This kind of info can go into some other academic encyclopedia, like
4551:
4469:
4448:
4396:
4336:
4270:
4143:
3404:
3382:
2289:
1441:
1142:
1067:
787:
390:
259:
244:
4165:
4530:
4491:
4312:
4204:
3334:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
3296:
3272:
3048:
2902:
2839:
2293:
2090:
1996:
1954:
1902:
1851:
1800:
1698:
1094:
1001:
974:
884:
849:
791:
3175:
https://web.archive.org/20120809165954/http://english.gov.cn/official/2005-07/27/content_17613.htm
4118:
3712:
3434:
3110:
2887:
2353:
2261:
1865:
would accept my proposition that the separate concept of a "PRC Taiwan Province" does not exist).
1787:
Running further on that train of thought, if we really do need two articles here, they should be
1242:
We need this article because Taiwan is commonly recognized, acknowledged etc to be part of China.
1090:
3217:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
4357:
3233:
465:, covering an area over which the PRC has no control. PRC claims the entirety of the island of
4633:
4503:
4492:"Taiwan punishes officers after celebrity's Apache chopper visit_News on Taiwan_ENG.TAIWAN.CN"
4224:
4177:
3178:
3156:
3087:
2985:
2939:
2674:
2635:
2612:
2568:
2545:
2531:
2472:
2267:
2249:
2146:
1898:
1843:
704:
669:
650:
546:
478:
409:
216:
103:
2444:
2223:
2182:
1201:"Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China" would be ruled by "People's Republic of China".
3836:
3697:
3683:
3655:
3566:
3565:
Alright, I guess I'll start with #3. Aren't all the images within the PRC's claimed region?
3538:
3508:
3438:
3248:
2950:
2864:
2798:
2620:
2576:
2426:
2365:
2201:
2161:
2061:
2030:
1986:
1972:
1921:
1888:
1829:
1729:
1629:
1537:
1473:
1407:
1357:
1319:
1280:
1249:
1213:
952:
908:
835:
687:
612:
571:
371:
333:
321:
3757:
Removed this section since it has nothing to do with the PRC administrative division itself
3240:
4577:
4515:
4449:"Taiwan demands apology from Philippines for fisherman's death - Xinhua | English.news.cn"
4230:
4189:
4166:"Lee Teng-hui's Diaoyu Islands remarks reprimanded in Taiwan_News on Taiwan_ENG.TAIWAN.CN"
3496:
3450:
the province is not the same as the proposed one-country-two-systems version of Taiwan --
3421:
3400:
3291:
3164:
3102:
3056:
3013:
3005:
2961:
2874:
2686:
2664:
2616:
2595:
2572:
2560:
2527:
2516:
2504:
2219:
2129:
2045:
2014:
1869:
1839:
1818:
1788:
1717:
1592:
1502:
the PRC doesn't have control over Taiwan but the PRC claims the area as part of the PRC.--
1040:
927:
817:
736:
708:
673:
654:
627:
587:
533:, covering an area the PRC has never controlled. PRC claims the entirety of the island of
386:
317:
276:
168:
99:
1208:
practice" Taiwan is governed by the Republic of China. Can you think of a better word?
4470:"Mainland's Taiwan affairs chief highlights long-waited trip - Xinhua | English.news.cn"
3495:
I added a few images to the sidebar, which were copied from the article about the ROC's
1749:
If "Taiwan Province, PRC" is not a government-in-exile, then it should not be so-called.
4375:
4242:
3974:
3825:
3199:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
2973:
2512:
2257:
1761:
233:
85:
3239:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2681:
as separate articles, even though they deal with an identitical piece of territory. --
2515:
and describes only part of the dispute. To say that including this information in the
1772:", talking about the marbles as they currently exist and are displayed, and a second "
4397:"Taiwan's KMT confirms appointments of four vice chairmen - Xinhua | English.news.cn"
3433:. Agreed that the current name is more appropriate given the content of the article.
2965:
2957:
2807:
2786:
2742:
2406:
2381:
2174:
1944:
1777:
1757:
1643:
1579:
1507:
1379:
1342:
1301:
1232:
1184:
220:
4629:
4626:
4605:
3646:
3586:
3083:
2981:
2464:
2448:
2227:
2186:
2142:
1894:
1875:
I tried to find a parallell treatment of such a subject, but couldn't. There is no
405:
248:
158:
2393:
2196:
How is Deng's proposal relevant to the question of whether to merge the articles?
1768:
be owned by Greece. Do we deal with their claims by setting up two articles? One "
215:
This article should be deleted. Taiwan Province has always been controlled by the
3696:
I tried a different image this time. Take a look! Do you like this image better?
4422:
4144:"Taiwan' s mainland affairs authority congratulates Macao' s Chui on reelection"
3206:
3032:
3024:
2969:
2878:
2860:
2422:
2361:
2197:
2157:
2057:
2026:
1982:
1968:
1917:
1825:
1725:
1625:
1533:
1469:
1403:
1353:
1315:
1276:
1245:
1209:
948:
904:
899:
831:
715:
683:
608:
567:
367:
329:
280:
202:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2817:
Novel and controversial conception, removal or merge page into Taiwan Province?
2781:
Currently, the article is silent on the issue, which is why it is outdated. --
2441:
Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China#Offer to Taiwan
3417:
3205:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
3052:
3009:
2722:
2682:
2660:
2591:
2125:
2041:
2010:
1036:
923:
813:
732:
623:
583:
538:
470:
172:
3109:
would be the largest city. Either way, Taipei would not be the largest city.
4376:"Taiwan leader Ma Ying-jeou re-elected KMT chairman - People's Daily Online"
4337:"Taiwan's food safety office opens amid scandals - Xinhua | English.news.cn"
4243:"Truck crashes into Taiwan leader's office building - People's Daily Online"
3773:
3106:
2943:
2734:
2678:
2522:
I don't think that's the case either way. It's not that hard to understand:
2345:
1981:
I also moved relevant comments into this new section. I hope no one minds.
1032:
4358:"Candidates register for Taiwan leader election - Xinhua - English.news.cn"
2244:
We need only one article for the topic, and for some reason we have three,
2332:
I yanked this section as it is very one-sided and completely unreference:
2156:
Why can't both conceptions of Taiwan be included in the "Taiwan" article?
4573:"A glimpse of Taiwan Normal University in Taipei - People's Daily Online"
4572:
2935:
2803:
2782:
2738:
2726:
2402:
2377:
1940:
1884:
1697:
Just my two cents. Not a fully thought out proposal for change as yet. --
1639:
1575:
1503:
1375:
1338:
1297:
1228:
1180:
526:
458:
325:
3161:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
1817:
is the term used by the People's Republic of China (PRC) to identify an
1296:
deletion and redirect has consensus. Please correct me if I am wrong.--
1263:
4582:
4271:"Taiwan's executive body to be reshuffled - Xinhua | English.news.cn"
2953:
2924:
2730:
2608:
2564:
2245:
1880:
534:
516:
466:
448:
313:
95:
81:
2439:
The section "Reunification Problem" is quite similar to the section
1589:
I believe the PRC is entitled to have an article to state their POV
731:
exile', rather than being about PRC claims on Taiwan in general. --
3169:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
2960:
as parts of "Taiwan Province" instead of viewing them as parts of
2349:
550:
482:
2873:
I second the removal of this page, or at a minimum merge it into
3769:
2859:
I would therefore support a recommendation to remove this page.
649:. For the Taiwan Province that currently exists as ruled by the
1850:
to be blah blah blah". I'll give this a little more thought. --
1337:
have any control over it (legally, outside ROC jurisdiction).--
1995:
Thanks for that. I also think this is the best way forward. --
877:
How can a soveirgn country in theory be a province of the PRC?
25:
3105:
as a separate city? If so, it'd be the largest city. If not,
3476:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this
3184:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
1486:
Readin suggested two sentences with the following phrases:-
3761:
Names used for ROC government, officials, and institutions
3179:
http://english.gov.cn/official/2005-07/27/content_17613.htm
699:
This page is about the theoretical province claimed by the
2704:
Recent AfDs have shown a consensus of no-merge established
1716:
A "province" in the sense it is used both here and in the
1613:
says the territory is "of Antarctica", not "of Australia".
4531:"Headline_Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council PRC"
4313:"Headline_Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council PRC"
4205:"Headline_Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council PRC"
3507:. What do you all think of adding images to the sidebar?
279:
article only. So I suggest to merge these two together.--
3145:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
2949:
Also, from the imaginary map on the "PRC Taiwan Office"(
2575:
so I don't think we need an independent article for it.
3377:
3150:
147:
Or, in a similar NPOV vein, "Western Sahara, Morocco"
4418:"20 killed, 270 injured in Taiwan gas leak explosions"
4292:"Taiwan legislative body reviews no-confidence motion"
2503:
The information in this article should be merged into
184:
is one of three Moroccan provinces in Western Sahara.
4606:"Refusing to mention ROC? Respect facts, please: MAC"
3468:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
3001:
Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China#Divisions
1797:
PRC definition of administrative boundaries in Taiwan
18:
Talk:Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China
4042:
chief of transportation and communications authority
2559:
I went ahead and merged the article in a section of
2497:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
1674:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
760:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
137:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
74:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
3209:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
1460:
I reread the article and couldn't find any sarcasm.
922:
different from the ROC claims on Inner Mongolia. --
4119:"New rules laid down for RTHK over Taiwan stories"
3484:. No further edits should be made to this section.
1402:clarified because of the misleading nomenclature.
2737:, the official positions should be reflected. --
2277:holds it as a special region, or location called
2222:will create a lot of confusion to the readers...
1868:I'm not sure why these bits were excised out of "
497:Taiwan Province of the People's Republic of China
429:Taiwan Province of the People's Republic of China
1846:government, is defined by the government of the
703:. For the administrative Taiwan Province of the
110:Separate article reconfirmed through recent AfDs
2394:http://www.china.org.cn/e-white/taiwan/10-4.htm
1167:The current opening text of the article says:-
645:This page is about the province claimed by the
348:Some AfDs have established a no-merge consensus
4436:Jiang Yi-huah, the island's executive chief...
3195:This message was posted before February 2018.
1690:be administered by the PRC while the ROC says
1393:." Or perhaps we could start with "On paper,
1389:structure in exile for territory it claims as
4604:Miao, Tzung-han; Chang, S.C. (20 July 2017).
4331:
4329:
4037:Minister of Transportation and Communications
3983:
3958:
3940:
3892:Ministry of Transportation and Communications
3381:– The title is more concise and unambiguous.
2838:on the part of the writer of this article. --
8:
4265:
4263:
4261:
4259:
3998:chief official in charge of foreign exchange
2315:Recent AfDs have shown consensus as no-merge
1813:Perhaps we should open with something like "
3897:transportation and communications authority
3373:Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China
3147:Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China
2254:Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China
2216:Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China
1815:Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China
1742:That's my point. "Taiwan Province, PRC" is
1618:Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China
1395:Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China
1391:Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China
772:Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China
3320:The following is a closed discussion of a
1764:, but the Greek government claims that it
537:and its surrounding islets, including the
469:and its surrounding islets, including the
1821:claimed but never controlled by the PRC."
180:Regarding the "Western Sahara" argument:
4378:. English.peopledaily.com.cn. 2013-07-21
4245:. English.peopledaily.com.cn. 2014-01-26
4015:Minister of the Mainland Affairs Council
3919:weather and earthquake monitoring agency
4110:
4100:leadership elections in the Taiwan area
4095:Republic of China Presidential Election
3503:swiftly reverted the edits, and we had
2927:File:Taiwan Province (PRC) prfc map.png
2218:). Discussing it in the merged article
1312:Talk:Free Area of the Republic of China
4511:
4501:
4185:
4175:
3125:2601:647:4200:40F2:9851:DE8B:79B8:A9AF
2086:Taiwanese descent in mainland China.
1310:There is a related discussion over at
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
4009:chief of health and welfare authority
2530:a real, functioning, province run by
2511:. The current situation represents a
664:This page is about the claims by the
424:We have an edit war going on between
7:
3339:The result of the move request was:
2822:whether this is a valid conception.
2491:The following discussion is closed.
2443:, therefore I added a link instead.
2212:Taiwan Special Administrative Region
2179:Taiwan Special Administrative Region
1780:and, if we needed an article on it,
1668:The following discussion is closed.
754:The following discussion is closed.
228:I agree. This article talks about a
131:The following discussion is closed.
68:The following discussion is closed.
3725:Not really seeing the improvement.
2542:Political status of Taiwan Province
2214:will be mentioned in this article (
2177:even proposed the establishment of
1724:believe should exist, but doesn't.
1492:"governing structure in exile"; and
3932:President of the Republic of China
3378:Taiwan, People's Republic of China
3266:"Names" for officials / bodies etc
3029:Fujian Province, Republic of China
1638:Sounds good. We can go for that.--
1273:Taiwan Province, Republic of China
726:Hasty editing, Terminology section
24:
4077:National Taiwan Normal University
3149:. Please take a moment to review
1782:Greek claims to the Elgin Marbles
1223:doesn't have any control over it.
312:As for merging this article with
4554:. News.xinhuanet.com. 2014-06-15
4472:. News.xinhuanet.com. 2014-06-25
4451:. News.xinhuanet.com. 2013-05-10
4399:. News.xinhuanet.com. 2014-09-14
4339:. News.xinhuanet.com. 2014-10-22
4273:. News.xinhuanet.com. 2013-02-01
3645:
3636:
3625:
3616:
3605:
3596:
3585:
3551:You can only ask one at a time.
3313:Requested move 29 September 2019
2708:The discussion above is closed.
2319:The discussion above is closed.
868:The discussion above is closed.
531:People's Republic of China (PRC)
463:People's Republic of China (PRC)
352:The discussion above is closed.
114:The discussion above is closed.
29:
4294:. chinadaily.com.cn. 2013-10-14
3820:Taiwan leader's office building
3668:Why these images specifically?
3025:official PRC government website
2964:and acknowledges the border of
2474:Contact Assembly of Jimbo Wales
485:upon its founding in 1949 (see
4004:Minister of Health and Welfare
3859:Ministry of Health and Welfare
3391:11:55, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
3347:closed by non-admin page mover
2466:Joe9320 of the Knowledge Party
2459:Representation section problem
2342:special administrative regions
1622:Australian Antarctic Territory
1611:Australian Antarctic Territory
1561:Australian Antarctic Territory
1512:15:06, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
1478:03:50, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
1454:03:09, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
1412:12:06, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
1384:04:45, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
1362:21:23, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
1347:15:44, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
1324:12:06, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
1306:04:45, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
1285:21:20, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
1254:21:20, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
1237:15:39, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
1218:15:31, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
1189:14:55, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
1155:02:53, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
1080:03:00, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
521:
512:
504:
453:
444:
436:
268:02:27, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
3018:02:24, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
2946:which is occupied by Japan.
2134:08:51, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
2120:. Its going to be very ugly.
2099:23:52, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
2066:23:43, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
2050:23:03, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
2035:22:07, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
2019:04:24, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
2005:21:51, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
1991:15:42, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
1977:15:39, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
1963:11:10, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
1949:08:10, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
1926:05:19, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
1911:04:35, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
1860:00:13, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
1842:, actually controlled by the
1834:23:19, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
1809:22:42, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
1793:PRC claims to Taiwan Province
1734:02:33, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
1707:00:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
1118:03:04, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
1089:On July 1st, 2008 wikipedian
206:19:28, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
89:22:44, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
4146:. Shanghai Daily. 2015-06-18
4026:Minister of National Defense
3864:health and welfare authority
3848:Ministry of Economic Affairs
3815:Presidential Office Building
3537:I would say option 1 and 3.
3305:15:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
3281:15:39, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
3261:12:53, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
3092:05:38, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
2990:11:13, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
2911:15:35, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
2869:00:58, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
2848:17:54, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
2791:15:35, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
2762:06:31, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
2725:'s promotion and mergers of
2717:Outdated as of December 2010
2453:10:44, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
2431:19:03, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
2411:18:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
2386:17:21, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
2370:17:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
2232:11:01, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
2206:15:43, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
2191:10:48, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
2166:15:43, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
1799:, or something like this. --
1648:22:46, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
1634:14:28, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
1584:04:03, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
1542:18:55, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
376:18:44, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
338:18:57, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
286:21:22, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
197:13:05, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
176:03:52, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
162:00:17, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
3993:Minister of Foreign Affairs
3903:Central Election Commission
3735:21:45, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
3721:15:34, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
3706:15:23, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
3692:15:15, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
3678:15:09, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
3664:15:05, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
3575:15:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
3561:14:56, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
3547:14:55, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
3533:14:42, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
3517:14:40, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
3460:08:54, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
3443:14:34, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
3426:13:28, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
3409:12:34, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
3366:14:05, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
3061:01:47, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
3039:18:58, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
2921:Administrative map is wrong
2812:22:03, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
2747:18:57, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
2151:17:38, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
1591:In fact they are not. See
4653:
4625:Also, this section is 99%
4315:. Gwytb.gov.cn. 2011-01-06
4066:National Taiwan University
4055:National Taipei University
3853:economic affairs authority
3226:(last update: 5 June 2024)
3167:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
3142:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
3119:01:47, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
2896:08:18, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
2554:14:09, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
2509:Political status of Taiwan
1937:political status of Taiwan
1877:Serbian province of Kosovo
1848:People's Republic of China
701:People's Republic of China
698:
666:People's Republic of China
663:
647:People's Republic of China
644:
555:Political status of Taiwan
487:Political status of Taiwan
224:00:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
3984:
3959:
3941:
3937:leader of the Taiwan Area
3133:14:29, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
2691:18:52, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
2669:18:48, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
2654:14:10, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
2629:17:48, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
2600:17:38, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
2478:10:24, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
2336:According to the policy "
858:02:31, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
840:13:41, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
822:07:43, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
804:02:34, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
784:or something like that.
780:China's claim on Taiwan
741:15:28, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
721:03:40, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
692:05:41, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
642:The heading used to say:
638:What the article is about
632:08:20, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
617:05:33, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
592:08:16, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
576:05:29, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
414:17:15, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
395:04:20, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
252:12:11, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
4638:13:04, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
4082:Taiwan Normal University
3925:ROC government officials
3870:Ministry of the Interior
3782:Mainland Affairs Council
3491:Adding images to sidebar
3474:Please do not modify it.
3327:Please do not modify it.
2710:Please do not modify it.
2585:22:46, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
2494:Please do not modify it.
2473:
2390:Here is the reference:-
2338:one country, two systems
2321:Please do not modify it.
2306:04:18, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
2240:. We must realize that
1883:article). Likewise, the
1879:(It's dealt with in the
1756:To give an analogy, the
1671:Please do not modify it.
1103:15:04, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
1045:16:17, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
1010:14:58, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
983:14:58, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
957:16:12, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
932:09:28, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
913:03:03, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
893:00:51, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
870:Please do not modify it.
757:Please do not modify it.
354:Please do not modify it.
237:17:21, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
134:Please do not modify it.
123:Merge with Taiwan (2006)
116:Please do not modify it.
71:Please do not modify it.
3138:External links modified
3101:Does the PRC recognize
2884:Encyclopædia Britannica
2465:
847:Interesting points made
4020:mainland affairs chief
3914:Central Weather Bureau
3076:Cross-strait relations
2978:special municipalities
2931:
1774:Elgin marbles (Greece)
1000:the Republic of China.
864:No consensus to rename
457:) is an adminstrative
182:Oued Ed-Dahab-Lagouira
4229:9 August 2012 at the
3797:ROC government bodies
3501:User:Horse Eye's Back
3080:Taiwan Affairs Office
2930:
2328:Reunification Problem
1660:Merge Proposal (2008)
1163:Theoretical Province?
324:has little to do with
42:of past discussions.
3768:Since 21 July 2021,
3207:regular verification
3192:to let others know.
3153:. If necessary, add
2110:political division.
1939:. Hope that helps.--
1791:(as it exists), and
245:Nemuro Subprefecture
3908:election commission
3881:Ministry of Justice
3197:After February 2018
3188:parameter below to
1760:are "owned" by the
1609:By comparison, the
525:) is a theoretical
509:traditional Chinese
441:traditional Chinese
4514:has numeric name (
4362:news.xinhuanet.com
4188:has numeric name (
3875:interior authority
3809:Taiwan authorities
3202:InternetArchiveBot
2932:
2354:Anti-Secession Law
2275:the world factbook
2262:Republic of Taiwan
2256:. Plus variations
1770:Elgin marbles (UK)
1597:WP:Content Forking
1091:user:Netking China
501:simplified Chinese
433:simplified Chinese
4529:张玲 (2014-08-11).
4203:张玲 (2014-06-30).
4071:Taiwan University
4060:Taipei University
3973:President of the
3886:justice authority
3350:
3259:
3227:
3078:, or perhaps the
2976:when they became
2940:Republic of China
2675:Judea and Samaria
2648:
2613:Republic of China
2569:Republic of China
2532:Republic of China
2309:
2292:comment added by
2268:consensus reality
2250:Republic of China
1899:Jammu and Kashmir
1887:redirects to the
1844:Republic of China
1444:comment added by
1145:comment added by
1070:comment added by
1035:'imperialist'. --
806:
790:comment added by
705:Republic of China
670:Republic of China
651:Republic of China
547:Republic of China
479:Republic of China
420:Opening paragraph
381:Removed statement
217:Republic of China
104:Republic of China
54:
53:
48:current talk page
4644:
4618:
4617:
4615:
4613:
4601:
4595:
4594:
4592:
4590:
4585:. 29 August 2013
4569:
4563:
4562:
4560:
4559:
4548:
4542:
4541:
4539:
4538:
4526:
4520:
4519:
4513:
4509:
4507:
4499:
4487:
4481:
4480:
4478:
4477:
4466:
4460:
4459:
4457:
4456:
4445:
4439:
4438:
4433:
4431:
4414:
4408:
4407:
4405:
4404:
4393:
4387:
4386:
4384:
4383:
4372:
4366:
4365:
4354:
4348:
4347:
4345:
4344:
4333:
4324:
4323:
4321:
4320:
4309:
4303:
4302:
4300:
4299:
4288:
4282:
4281:
4279:
4278:
4267:
4254:
4253:
4251:
4250:
4239:
4233:
4222:
4216:
4215:
4213:
4212:
4200:
4194:
4193:
4187:
4183:
4181:
4173:
4161:
4155:
4154:
4152:
4151:
4140:
4134:
4133:
4131:
4129:
4115:
4048:ROC institutions
3987:
3986:
3962:
3961:
3944:
3943:
3842:legislative body
3837:Legislative Yuan
3727:Horse Eye's Back
3670:Horse Eye's Back
3649:
3640:
3629:
3620:
3609:
3600:
3589:
3553:Horse Eye's Back
3525:Horse Eye's Back
3380:
3363:
3361:
3356:
3344:
3329:
3255:
3254:Talk to my owner
3250:
3225:
3224:
3203:
3168:
3160:
3035:
2952:), "PRC" claims
2928:
2638:
2496:
2475:
2471:
2467:
2308:
2286:
2210:I expected that
1889:Falkland Islands
1673:
1456:
785:
759:
718:
696:How about this:
523:
514:
506:
455:
446:
438:
402:this white paper
322:Napoleon Complex
283:
136:
106:and edit there.
73:
33:
32:
26:
4652:
4651:
4647:
4646:
4645:
4643:
4642:
4641:
4623:
4622:
4621:
4611:
4609:
4603:
4602:
4598:
4588:
4586:
4571:
4570:
4566:
4557:
4555:
4550:
4549:
4545:
4536:
4534:
4528:
4527:
4523:
4510:
4500:
4489:
4488:
4484:
4475:
4473:
4468:
4467:
4463:
4454:
4452:
4447:
4446:
4442:
4429:
4427:
4426:. 1 August 2014
4416:
4415:
4411:
4402:
4400:
4395:
4394:
4390:
4381:
4379:
4374:
4373:
4369:
4356:
4355:
4351:
4342:
4340:
4335:
4334:
4327:
4318:
4316:
4311:
4310:
4306:
4297:
4295:
4290:
4289:
4285:
4276:
4274:
4269:
4268:
4257:
4248:
4246:
4241:
4240:
4236:
4231:Wayback Machine
4223:
4219:
4210:
4208:
4202:
4201:
4197:
4184:
4174:
4163:
4162:
4158:
4149:
4147:
4142:
4141:
4137:
4127:
4125:
4117:
4116:
4112:
4090:
4050:
3980:executive chief
3927:
3799:
3759:
3654:
3653:
3652:
3651:
3650:
3642:
3641:
3632:
3631:
3630:
3622:
3621:
3612:
3611:
3610:
3602:
3601:
3592:
3591:
3590:
3505:this discussion
3497:Taiwan Province
3493:
3488:
3383:Interstellarity
3376:
3359:
3354:
3352:
3325:
3315:
3292:Taiwan Province
3288:
3268:
3258:
3253:
3218:
3211:have permission
3201:
3162:
3154:
3140:
3103:New Taipei City
3099:
3071:
3033:
3006:Taiwan Province
2997:
2962:Fukien Province
2926:
2923:
2875:Taiwan Province
2819:
2719:
2714:
2713:
2617:Taiwan Province
2573:Taiwan Province
2561:Taiwan Province
2528:Taiwan Province
2517:Taiwan Province
2505:Taiwan Province
2501:
2492:
2485:
2469:
2461:
2330:
2325:
2324:
2287:
2220:Taiwan Province
2139:Oppose the move
1870:Taiwan Province
1840:Taiwan Province
1789:Taiwan Province
1718:Taiwan Province
1678:
1669:
1662:
1439:
1262:The article on
1165:
1087:
879:
874:
873:
764:
755:
748:
728:
716:
712:
709:Taiwan Province
677:
674:Taiwan Province
658:
655:Taiwan Province
640:
600:
545:control of the
477:control of the
422:
383:
363:
361:Further reading
358:
357:
318:Taiwan Province
281:
277:Taiwan Province
266:
195:
187:
169:Taiwan Province
141:
132:
125:
120:
119:
100:Taiwan Province
78:
69:
62:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
4650:
4648:
4620:
4619:
4608:. Focus Taiwan
4596:
4578:People's Daily
4564:
4543:
4533:. Gwytb.gov.cn
4521:
4482:
4461:
4440:
4409:
4388:
4367:
4349:
4325:
4304:
4283:
4255:
4234:
4217:
4207:. Gwytb.gov.cn
4195:
4156:
4135:
4109:
4108:
4104:
4103:
4102:
4089:
4086:
4085:
4084:
4073:
4062:
4049:
4046:
4045:
4044:
4033:
4031:military chief
4022:
4011:
4000:
3989:
3975:Executive Yuan
3964:
3950:Vice President
3946:
3926:
3923:
3922:
3921:
3910:
3899:
3888:
3877:
3866:
3855:
3844:
3833:
3831:executive body
3826:Executive Yuan
3822:
3811:
3798:
3795:
3758:
3755:
3754:
3753:
3752:
3751:
3750:
3749:
3748:
3747:
3746:
3745:
3744:
3743:
3742:
3741:
3740:
3739:
3738:
3737:
3723:
3644:
3643:
3635:
3634:
3633:
3624:
3623:
3615:
3614:
3613:
3604:
3603:
3595:
3594:
3593:
3584:
3583:
3582:
3581:
3580:
3492:
3489:
3487:
3486:
3470:requested move
3464:
3463:
3462:
3445:
3428:
3411:
3371:
3369:
3337:
3336:
3322:requested move
3316:
3314:
3311:
3309:
3297:PalaceGuard008
3287:
3284:
3273:PalaceGuard008
3267:
3264:
3251:
3245:
3244:
3237:
3182:
3181:
3173:Added archive
3139:
3136:
3098:
3095:
3070:
3067:
3066:
3065:
3064:
3063:
3042:
3041:
2996:
2993:
2974:Kaohsiung City
2922:
2919:
2918:
2917:
2916:
2915:
2914:
2913:
2903:PalaceGuard008
2856:
2855:
2840:PalaceGuard008
2818:
2815:
2796:
2795:
2794:
2793:
2779:
2778:
2777:
2774:
2765:
2764:
2718:
2715:
2707:
2702:
2700:
2699:
2698:
2697:
2696:
2695:
2694:
2693:
2671:
2588:
2587:
2538:
2537:
2534:
2500:
2499:
2487:
2486:
2484:
2481:
2460:
2457:
2456:
2455:
2437:
2436:
2435:
2434:
2433:
2399:
2398:
2397:
2396:
2388:
2359:
2358:
2329:
2326:
2318:
2313:
2311:
2310:
2294:Overthinkingly
2284:
2271:
2264:
2258:Chinese Taipei
2235:
2234:
2208:
2169:
2168:
2106:
2103:
2091:PalaceGuard008
2083:
2082:
2081:
2080:
2079:
2078:
2077:
2076:
2075:
2074:
2073:
2072:
2071:
2070:
2069:
2068:
2054:
2053:
2052:
2023:
2022:
2021:
1997:PalaceGuard008
1979:
1955:PalaceGuard008
1951:
1932:
1903:PalaceGuard008
1892:
1873:
1866:
1862:
1852:PalaceGuard008
1822:
1801:PalaceGuard008
1785:
1762:British Museum
1754:
1750:
1747:
1737:
1736:
1721:
1714:
1699:PalaceGuard008
1677:
1676:
1664:
1663:
1661:
1658:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1653:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1614:
1607:
1603:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1567:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1545:
1544:
1528:
1527:
1524:
1520:
1519:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1495:"On paper...".
1493:
1481:
1480:
1465:
1461:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1399:
1371:
1368:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1293:
1268:
1260:
1256:
1227:over Taiwan.--
1224:
1205:
1202:
1198:
1173:
1172:
1164:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1139:
1137:
1134:
1132:
1129:
1127:
1121:
1120:
1110:99.241.158.240
1095:AMERICAN MIGHT
1086:
1083:
1058:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1002:AMERICAN MIGHT
990:
989:
988:
987:
986:
985:
975:AMERICAN MIGHT
966:
965:
964:
963:
962:
961:
960:
959:
937:
936:
935:
934:
916:
915:
885:AMERICAN MIGHT
878:
875:
867:
861:
860:
850:AMERICAN MIGHT
843:
842:
824:
807:
792:AMERICAN MIGHT
777:
773:
763:
762:
750:
749:
747:
744:
727:
724:
660:
639:
636:
635:
634:
599:
596:
595:
594:
560:
492:
427:
421:
418:
417:
416:
382:
379:
362:
359:
351:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
300:
291:
290:
289:
288:
262:
256:
255:
213:
212:
211:
210:
209:
208:
189:
185:
140:
139:
127:
126:
124:
121:
113:
77:
76:
64:
63:
61:
58:
56:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4649:
4640:
4639:
4635:
4631:
4628:
4607:
4600:
4597:
4584:
4580:
4579:
4574:
4568:
4565:
4553:
4547:
4544:
4532:
4525:
4522:
4517:
4505:
4497:
4496:eng.taiwan.cn
4493:
4486:
4483:
4471:
4465:
4462:
4450:
4444:
4441:
4437:
4425:
4424:
4419:
4413:
4410:
4398:
4392:
4389:
4377:
4371:
4368:
4363:
4359:
4353:
4350:
4338:
4332:
4330:
4326:
4314:
4308:
4305:
4293:
4287:
4284:
4272:
4266:
4264:
4262:
4260:
4256:
4244:
4238:
4235:
4232:
4228:
4225:
4221:
4218:
4206:
4199:
4196:
4191:
4179:
4171:
4170:eng.taiwan.cn
4167:
4160:
4157:
4145:
4139:
4136:
4124:
4120:
4114:
4111:
4107:
4101:
4097:
4096:
4092:
4091:
4087:
4083:
4079:
4078:
4074:
4072:
4068:
4067:
4063:
4061:
4057:
4056:
4052:
4051:
4047:
4043:
4039:
4038:
4034:
4032:
4028:
4027:
4023:
4021:
4017:
4016:
4012:
4010:
4006:
4005:
4001:
3999:
3995:
3994:
3990:
3981:
3977:
3976:
3970:
3969:
3965:
3956:
3955:deputy leader
3952:
3951:
3947:
3938:
3934:
3933:
3929:
3928:
3924:
3920:
3916:
3915:
3911:
3909:
3905:
3904:
3900:
3898:
3894:
3893:
3889:
3887:
3883:
3882:
3878:
3876:
3872:
3871:
3867:
3865:
3861:
3860:
3856:
3854:
3850:
3849:
3845:
3843:
3839:
3838:
3834:
3832:
3828:
3827:
3823:
3821:
3817:
3816:
3812:
3810:
3806:
3805:
3801:
3800:
3796:
3794:
3792:
3788:
3784:
3783:
3777:
3775:
3771:
3766:
3762:
3756:
3736:
3732:
3728:
3724:
3722:
3718:
3714:
3709:
3708:
3707:
3703:
3699:
3695:
3694:
3693:
3689:
3685:
3681:
3680:
3679:
3675:
3671:
3667:
3666:
3665:
3661:
3657:
3648:
3639:
3628:
3619:
3608:
3599:
3588:
3578:
3577:
3576:
3572:
3568:
3564:
3563:
3562:
3558:
3554:
3550:
3549:
3548:
3544:
3540:
3536:
3535:
3534:
3530:
3526:
3521:
3520:
3519:
3518:
3514:
3510:
3506:
3502:
3498:
3490:
3485:
3483:
3479:
3475:
3471:
3466:
3465:
3461:
3457:
3453:
3449:
3446:
3444:
3440:
3436:
3432:
3429:
3427:
3423:
3419:
3415:
3412:
3410:
3406:
3402:
3398:
3395:
3394:
3393:
3392:
3388:
3384:
3379:
3374:
3368:
3367:
3364:
3362:
3357:
3348:
3342:
3335:
3333:
3328:
3323:
3318:
3317:
3312:
3310:
3307:
3306:
3302:
3298:
3293:
3285:
3283:
3282:
3278:
3274:
3265:
3263:
3262:
3256:
3249:
3242:
3238:
3235:
3231:
3230:
3229:
3222:
3216:
3212:
3208:
3204:
3198:
3193:
3191:
3187:
3180:
3176:
3172:
3171:
3170:
3166:
3158:
3152:
3148:
3143:
3137:
3135:
3134:
3130:
3126:
3121:
3120:
3116:
3112:
3111:Blaylockjam10
3108:
3104:
3096:
3094:
3093:
3089:
3085:
3081:
3077:
3068:
3062:
3058:
3054:
3050:
3046:
3045:
3044:
3043:
3040:
3037:
3030:
3026:
3022:
3021:
3020:
3019:
3015:
3011:
3007:
3002:
2994:
2992:
2991:
2987:
2983:
2979:
2975:
2971:
2967:
2966:Taichung City
2963:
2959:
2955:
2951:
2947:
2945:
2941:
2937:
2929:
2920:
2912:
2908:
2904:
2899:
2898:
2897:
2893:
2889:
2888:Mistakefinder
2885:
2880:
2876:
2872:
2871:
2870:
2866:
2862:
2858:
2857:
2852:
2851:
2850:
2849:
2845:
2841:
2837:
2831:
2827:
2823:
2816:
2814:
2813:
2809:
2805:
2800:
2792:
2788:
2784:
2780:
2775:
2772:
2771:
2769:
2768:
2767:
2766:
2763:
2759:
2755:
2751:
2750:
2749:
2748:
2744:
2740:
2736:
2732:
2728:
2724:
2716:
2711:
2706:
2705:
2692:
2688:
2684:
2680:
2676:
2672:
2670:
2666:
2662:
2657:
2656:
2655:
2652:
2651:
2646:
2642:
2637:
2632:
2631:
2630:
2626:
2622:
2618:
2614:
2610:
2606:
2605:
2604:
2603:
2602:
2601:
2597:
2593:
2586:
2582:
2578:
2574:
2570:
2566:
2562:
2558:
2557:
2556:
2555:
2551:
2547:
2543:
2535:
2533:
2529:
2525:
2524:
2523:
2520:
2518:
2514:
2510:
2506:
2498:
2495:
2489:
2488:
2482:
2480:
2479:
2476:
2468:
2458:
2454:
2450:
2446:
2442:
2438:
2432:
2428:
2424:
2419:
2418:
2417:
2416:
2415:
2414:
2413:
2412:
2408:
2404:
2395:
2392:
2391:
2389:
2387:
2383:
2379:
2374:
2373:
2372:
2371:
2367:
2363:
2355:
2351:
2347:
2343:
2339:
2335:
2334:
2333:
2327:
2322:
2317:
2316:
2307:
2303:
2299:
2295:
2291:
2285:
2282:
2281:
2276:
2272:
2269:
2265:
2263:
2259:
2255:
2251:
2247:
2243:
2242:
2241:
2239:
2233:
2229:
2225:
2221:
2217:
2213:
2209:
2207:
2203:
2199:
2195:
2194:
2193:
2192:
2188:
2184:
2180:
2176:
2175:Deng Xiaoping
2173:
2167:
2163:
2159:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2152:
2148:
2144:
2140:
2136:
2135:
2131:
2127:
2121:
2119:
2114:
2111:
2107:
2104:
2101:
2100:
2096:
2092:
2087:
2067:
2063:
2059:
2055:
2051:
2047:
2043:
2038:
2037:
2036:
2032:
2028:
2024:
2020:
2016:
2012:
2008:
2007:
2006:
2002:
1998:
1994:
1993:
1992:
1988:
1984:
1980:
1978:
1974:
1970:
1966:
1965:
1964:
1960:
1956:
1952:
1950:
1946:
1942:
1938:
1933:
1931:publications.
1929:
1928:
1927:
1923:
1919:
1914:
1913:
1912:
1908:
1904:
1900:
1896:
1893:
1890:
1886:
1882:
1878:
1874:
1871:
1867:
1863:
1861:
1857:
1853:
1849:
1845:
1841:
1837:
1836:
1835:
1831:
1827:
1823:
1820:
1816:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1806:
1802:
1798:
1794:
1790:
1786:
1783:
1779:
1778:Elgin Marbles
1775:
1771:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1758:Elgin marbles
1755:
1751:
1748:
1745:
1741:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1735:
1731:
1727:
1722:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1704:
1700:
1695:
1693:
1689:
1684:
1675:
1672:
1666:
1665:
1659:
1649:
1645:
1641:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1619:
1615:
1612:
1608:
1604:
1602:
1598:
1594:
1590:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1581:
1577:
1573:
1568:
1565:
1564:
1562:
1557:
1552:
1551:
1550:Readin said:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1543:
1539:
1535:
1530:
1529:
1525:
1522:
1521:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1509:
1505:
1494:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1484:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1466:
1462:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1446:24.168.106.43
1443:
1435:
1433:
1429:
1428:24.168.106.43
1413:
1409:
1405:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1381:
1377:
1372:
1369:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1335:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1313:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1303:
1299:
1294:
1291:
1290:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1269:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1234:
1230:
1225:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1206:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1177:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1162:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1147:24.168.106.43
1144:
1140:
1138:
1135:
1133:
1130:
1128:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1085:Biased edits!
1084:
1082:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1072:24.168.106.43
1069:
1064:
1060:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1011:
1007:
1003:
998:
997:
996:
995:
994:
993:
992:
991:
984:
980:
976:
972:
971:
970:
969:
968:
967:
958:
954:
950:
945:
944:
943:
942:
941:
940:
939:
938:
933:
929:
925:
920:
919:
918:
917:
914:
910:
906:
901:
897:
896:
895:
894:
890:
886:
882:
876:
871:
866:
865:
859:
855:
851:
848:
845:
844:
841:
837:
833:
828:
825:
823:
819:
815:
811:
808:
805:
801:
797:
793:
789:
783:
782:
781:
778:
774:
770:
769:Change from:
767:
761:
758:
752:
751:
745:
743:
742:
738:
734:
725:
723:
722:
719:
710:
706:
702:
697:
694:
693:
689:
685:
680:
675:
671:
667:
662:
661:Now it says:
656:
652:
648:
643:
637:
633:
629:
625:
621:
620:
619:
618:
614:
610:
605:
597:
593:
589:
585:
580:
579:
578:
577:
573:
569:
564:
563:adminstrative
558:
556:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
524:
518:
510:
502:
498:
494:
490:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
450:
442:
434:
430:
425:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
399:
398:
397:
396:
392:
388:
380:
378:
377:
373:
369:
360:
355:
350:
349:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
310:
309:
308:
307:
306:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
287:
284:
278:
274:
273:
272:
271:
270:
269:
265:
261:
253:
250:
246:
241:
240:
239:
238:
235:
231:
226:
225:
222:
218:
207:
204:
200:
199:
198:
194:
193:
183:
179:
178:
177:
174:
170:
166:
165:
164:
163:
160:
155:
152:
148:
145:
138:
135:
129:
128:
122:
117:
112:
111:
107:
105:
101:
97:
91:
90:
87:
83:
75:
72:
66:
65:
60:Separate page
59:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
4624:
4610:. Retrieved
4599:
4587:. Retrieved
4576:
4567:
4556:. Retrieved
4546:
4535:. Retrieved
4524:
4495:
4485:
4474:. Retrieved
4464:
4453:. Retrieved
4443:
4435:
4428:. Retrieved
4421:
4412:
4401:. Retrieved
4391:
4380:. Retrieved
4370:
4361:
4352:
4341:. Retrieved
4317:. Retrieved
4307:
4296:. Retrieved
4286:
4275:. Retrieved
4247:. Retrieved
4237:
4220:
4209:. Retrieved
4198:
4169:
4159:
4148:. Retrieved
4138:
4126:. Retrieved
4122:
4113:
4105:
4099:
4093:
4081:
4075:
4070:
4064:
4059:
4053:
4041:
4035:
4030:
4024:
4019:
4013:
4008:
4002:
3997:
3991:
3979:
3972:
3966:
3954:
3948:
3936:
3930:
3918:
3912:
3907:
3901:
3896:
3890:
3885:
3879:
3874:
3868:
3863:
3857:
3852:
3846:
3841:
3835:
3830:
3824:
3819:
3813:
3808:
3802:
3790:
3786:
3780:
3778:
3767:
3763:
3760:
3494:
3473:
3467:
3452:67.70.33.184
3447:
3430:
3413:
3396:
3370:
3351:
3340:
3338:
3326:
3319:
3308:
3289:
3269:
3246:
3221:source check
3200:
3194:
3189:
3185:
3183:
3144:
3141:
3122:
3100:
3097:Largest city
3072:
2998:
2948:
2933:
2835:
2832:
2828:
2824:
2820:
2797:
2720:
2709:
2703:
2701:
2649:
2636:Sillyfolkboy
2589:
2546:Sillyfolkboy
2539:
2521:
2502:
2493:
2490:
2483:Merge (2009)
2462:
2400:
2360:
2331:
2320:
2314:
2312:
2279:
2237:
2236:
2211:
2178:
2171:
2170:
2138:
2137:
2122:
2117:
2115:
2112:
2108:
2105:
2102:
2088:
2084:
1895:Azad Kashmir
1814:
1765:
1743:
1696:
1691:
1687:
1682:
1679:
1670:
1667:
1617:
1599:
1588:
1500:
1485:
1482:
1436:
1426:
1394:
1390:
1241:
1178:
1174:
1166:
1088:
1065:
1061:
1057:
883:
880:
869:
863:
862:
846:
826:
809:
779:
775:
771:
768:
765:
756:
753:
729:
713:
695:
681:
678:
659:
641:
603:
601:
562:
559:
542:
522:Táiwān shěng
520:
496:
495:
491:
474:
454:Táiwān shěng
452:
428:
426:
423:
384:
364:
353:
347:
346:
257:
229:
227:
214:
191:
156:
153:
149:
146:
142:
133:
130:
115:
109:
108:
92:
79:
70:
67:
55:
43:
37:
4423:China Daily
3482:move review
3332:move review
2970:Tainan City
2942:except for
2879:Taiwan Area
2754:65.93.15.80
2288:—Preceding
1713:government.
1440:—Preceding
1289:You said:-
900:irredentist
786:—Preceding
746:Name Change
598:map caption
230:nonexistent
36:This is an
4558:2015-07-10
4537:2015-07-10
4476:2015-07-10
4455:2015-07-10
4430:20 October
4403:2015-07-10
4382:2015-07-10
4343:2015-07-10
4319:2015-07-10
4298:2015-07-10
4277:2015-07-10
4249:2015-07-10
4211:2015-07-10
4150:2015-07-10
4106:References
4088:ROC events
3804:Government
3401:Necrothesp
3286:Side panel
3008:article.--
2995:Divisions?
2836:conjecture
2723:New Taipei
2357:autonomy".
2124:straits.--
539:Pescadores
513:臺灣省 or 台灣省
471:Pescadores
445:臺灣省 or 台灣省
387:Roadrunner
4589:26 August
3978:) as the
3774:Hong Kong
3478:talk page
3341:Not moved
3241:this tool
3234:this tool
3107:Kaohsiung
3049:synthesis
3023:Well the
2944:Tiaoyutai
2735:Kaohsiung
2679:West Bank
2346:Hong Kong
2118:edit wars
1624:article.
1275:article.
1033:Catalonia
234:SergeiXXX
86:Cripipper
84:article.
4504:cite web
4227:Archived
4178:cite web
3698:Félix An
3684:Félix An
3656:Félix An
3567:Félix An
3539:Félix An
3509:Félix An
3480:or in a
3247:Cheers.—
3157:cbignore
2799:This map
2727:Taichung
2571:and now
2526:We have
2513:POV fork
2376:offer.--
2302:contribs
2290:unsigned
1885:Malvinas
1606:dispute.
1593:WP:forum
1442:unsigned
1398:Taiwan."
1143:unsigned
1068:unsigned
947:country.
800:contribs
788:unsigned
543:de facto
527:province
475:de facto
459:province
366:article.
326:Napoleon
221:TingMing
4630:DrIdiot
4612:24 July
4128:21 July
4098:as the
4080:as the
4069:as the
4058:as the
4040:as the
4029:as the
4018:as the
4007:as the
3996:as the
3985:行政机构负责人
3968:Premier
3953:as the
3942:台湾地区领导人
3935:as the
3917:as the
3906:as the
3895:as the
3884:as the
3873:as the
3862:as the
3851:as the
3840:as the
3829:as the
3818:as the
3807:as the
3257::Online
3186:checked
3151:my edit
3084:WEvanTh
2982:Jabo-er
2621:Laurent
2577:Laurent
2273:The US
2238:Support
2143:Gumuhua
1374:that?--
1264:Gandalf
529:of the
461:of the
264:my talk
249:Stefan2
203:Jim Liu
159:Zazaban
39:archive
4583:Xinhua
4512:|last=
4186:|last=
3787:County
3448:Oppose
3435:Kdm852
3431:Oppose
3414:Oppose
3397:Oppose
3360:(talk)
3165:nobots
3034:ASDFGH
2954:Kinmen
2861:Readin
2733:, and
2731:Tainan
2634:whole.
2609:Taiwan
2565:Taiwan
2423:Readin
2362:Readin
2280:Taiwan
2252:, and
2246:Taiwan
2198:Readin
2172:Oppose
2158:Readin
2058:Readin
2027:Readin
1983:Readin
1969:Readin
1918:Readin
1881:Kosovo
1826:Readin
1766:should
1726:Readin
1692:should
1688:should
1626:Readin
1534:Readin
1470:Readin
1404:Readin
1354:Readin
1316:Readin
1277:Readin
1267:later.
1246:Readin
1210:Readin
949:Readin
905:Readin
832:Readin
827:Oppose
810:Oppose
717:Jerrch
707:, see
684:Readin
672:, see
653:, see
609:Readin
568:Readin
535:Taiwan
517:pinyin
467:Taiwan
449:pinyin
368:Readin
330:Readin
314:Taiwan
260:Chris!
102:, and
96:Taiwan
82:Taiwan
4627:WP:OR
4490:???.
4164:???.
3791:Mayor
3418:Srnec
3053:Jiang
3010:Jiang
2958:Matsu
2683:Soman
2661:Soman
2645:edits
2592:Soman
2350:Macau
2126:Visik
2042:Soman
2011:Soman
1686:says
1037:Soman
924:Soman
814:Soman
733:Soman
624:Soman
604:legal
584:Soman
551:China
493:and
483:China
406:Loren
282:Jerry
173:Jiang
16:<
4634:talk
4614:2017
4591:2021
4516:help
4432:2021
4190:help
4130:2021
4123:RTHK
3971:(or
3960:副领导人
3789:and
3770:RTHK
3731:talk
3717:talk
3702:talk
3688:talk
3674:talk
3660:talk
3571:talk
3557:talk
3543:talk
3529:talk
3513:talk
3456:talk
3439:talk
3422:talk
3405:talk
3387:talk
3355:SITH
3301:Talk
3277:Talk
3190:true
3129:talk
3115:talk
3088:talk
3057:talk
3051:. --
3014:talk
2986:talk
2980:. --
2972:and
2956:and
2907:Talk
2892:talk
2865:talk
2844:Talk
2808:talk
2787:talk
2758:talk
2743:talk
2687:talk
2677:and
2665:talk
2641:talk
2625:talk
2615:and
2596:talk
2581:talk
2550:talk
2507:and
2449:talk
2427:talk
2407:talk
2382:talk
2366:talk
2348:and
2298:talk
2260:and
2228:talk
2202:talk
2187:talk
2181:...
2162:talk
2147:talk
2130:talk
2095:Talk
2062:talk
2046:talk
2031:talk
2015:talk
2001:Talk
1987:talk
1973:talk
1959:Talk
1945:talk
1922:talk
1907:Talk
1897:and
1856:Talk
1830:talk
1819:area
1805:Talk
1730:talk
1703:Talk
1644:talk
1630:talk
1595:and
1580:talk
1538:talk
1508:talk
1474:talk
1450:talk
1432:talk
1408:talk
1380:talk
1367:law.
1358:talk
1343:talk
1320:talk
1302:talk
1281:talk
1250:talk
1233:talk
1214:talk
1185:talk
1151:talk
1114:talk
1099:talk
1076:talk
1041:talk
1006:talk
979:talk
953:talk
928:talk
909:talk
889:talk
854:talk
836:talk
818:talk
796:talk
737:talk
688:talk
628:talk
613:talk
588:talk
572:talk
489:).
410:talk
391:talk
372:talk
334:talk
192:talk
3772:in
3713:CMD
3215:RfC
3177:to
3036:=]
2936:PRC
2804:Nlu
2783:Nlu
2739:Nlu
2643:) (
2403:pyl
2378:pyl
2344:of
1941:pyl
1744:not
1683:the
1640:pyl
1576:pyl
1504:pyl
1376:pyl
1339:pyl
1298:pyl
1229:pyl
1181:pyl
557:).
505:台湾省
437:台湾省
316:or
4636:)
4581:.
4575:.
4508::
4506:}}
4502:{{
4494:.
4434:.
4420:.
4360:.
4328:^
4258:^
4182::
4180:}}
4176:{{
4168:.
4121:.
3793:.
3785:,
3733:)
3719:)
3704:)
3690:)
3676:)
3662:)
3573:)
3559:)
3545:)
3531:)
3515:)
3499:.
3472:.
3458:)
3441:)
3424:)
3416:.
3407:)
3389:)
3375:→
3343:.
3324:.
3303:)
3295:--
3279:)
3271:--
3228:.
3223:}}
3219:{{
3163:{{
3159:}}
3155:{{
3131:)
3117:)
3090:)
3059:)
3016:)
2988:)
2968:,
2909:)
2894:)
2886:.
2867:)
2846:)
2810:)
2802:--
2789:)
2760:)
2745:)
2729:,
2689:)
2667:)
2627:)
2611:,
2598:)
2583:)
2567:,
2552:)
2544:?
2451:)
2445:UU
2429:)
2409:)
2401:--
2384:)
2368:)
2304:)
2300:•
2248:,
2230:)
2224:UU
2204:)
2189:)
2183:UU
2164:)
2149:)
2132:)
2097:)
2064:)
2048:)
2040:--
2033:)
2017:)
2003:)
1989:)
1975:)
1961:)
1947:)
1924:)
1909:)
1858:)
1832:)
1807:)
1732:)
1705:)
1646:)
1632:)
1582:)
1540:)
1510:)
1476:)
1452:)
1410:)
1382:)
1360:)
1345:)
1322:)
1314:.
1304:)
1283:)
1252:)
1235:)
1216:)
1187:)
1153:)
1116:)
1101:)
1078:)
1043:)
1008:)
981:)
955:)
930:)
911:)
891:)
856:)
838:)
820:)
802:)
798:•
776:to
739:)
714:--
690:)
630:)
615:)
590:)
574:)
519::
515:;
511::
507:;
503::
451::
447:;
443::
439:;
435::
412:)
404:.-
393:)
374:)
336:)
188:/
98:,
4632:(
4616:.
4593:.
4561:.
4540:.
4518:)
4498:.
4479:.
4458:.
4406:.
4385:.
4364:.
4346:.
4322:.
4301:.
4280:.
4252:.
4214:.
4192:)
4172:.
4153:.
4132:.
3988:)
3982:(
3963:)
3957:(
3945:)
3939:(
3729:(
3715:(
3700:(
3686:(
3672:(
3658:(
3569:(
3555:(
3541:(
3527:(
3511:(
3454:(
3437:(
3420:(
3403:(
3385:(
3349:)
3345:(
3299:(
3275:(
3243:.
3236:.
3127:(
3113:(
3086:(
3055:(
3012:(
2984:(
2905:(
2890:(
2863:(
2842:(
2806:(
2785:(
2756:(
2741:(
2685:(
2663:(
2647:)
2639:(
2623:(
2594:(
2579:(
2548:(
2470:|
2447:(
2425:(
2405:(
2380:(
2364:(
2296:(
2270:.
2226:(
2200:(
2185:(
2160:(
2145:(
2128:(
2093:(
2060:(
2044:(
2029:(
2013:(
1999:(
1985:(
1971:(
1957:(
1943:(
1920:(
1905:(
1854:(
1828:(
1803:(
1784:.
1728:(
1701:(
1642:(
1628:(
1616:"
1578:(
1536:(
1506:(
1472:(
1448:(
1430:(
1406:(
1378:(
1356:(
1341:(
1318:(
1300:(
1279:(
1248:(
1231:(
1212:(
1183:(
1149:(
1112:(
1097:(
1074:(
1039:(
1004:(
977:(
951:(
926:(
907:(
887:(
852:(
834:(
816:(
794:(
735:(
711:.
686:(
676:.
657:.
626:(
611:(
586:(
570:(
499:(
431:(
408:(
389:(
370:(
332:(
254:)
186:└
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.