6022:. The only reason the length is so small is because people have been stopped from adding to the article. The video itself is chock-full of duly mentionable details: to name a few, her outfits (which are famous for making Lady GaGa who she is) and how they reflect other celebrities or echo the video "Paparazzi;" the cast members who are worthy of mention; the countless movie references; AND for all the attention the video has received. Regardless of your personal views on Lady GaGa, there is no logical reason to not create a separate article. The comparison to Thriller, while flawed in the sense of "legacy material," does draw good parallels; however, there is no possible way to discern whether it will be popular in years to come. At that time, if the article receives no further mention, why not just merge it back? It is obvious there is a lot more to the video than what is in the lackluster synopsis.
5637:, but if the "Thriller" music video have it's own article, why shouldn't "Telephone" have it?..Also, in the Michae; Jackson articles there are a lot of unimportant informations, but if someone wants to add something more in a GaGa article (E.g.: Telephone) someone must tell you that "there is to many further information"...so?? Isn't this what's Knowledge about, to be an online encyclopedia..in encyclopedias nobody cuts out some pieces, just because the article was too long..that's other ideea..but, as long as the "Telephone", "Paparazzi" and "Alejandro" m. videos are coming together, as a short (at least 22 minutes long), why couldn't be there a "Telephone" or other else name page about this short...with it's synopsis, the releasing, the development and the credits, as in the articles about other films..??? Please, notice my opinion..and do something!! :)
5549:. I do agree with what Candyo32 said, but, popular Lady Gaga articles such as "Paparazzi" and "Bad Romance" have done the exact same thing as this video and have been merged into the song article. Yes, the music video has been compared to Thriller (which has it's own page), but, just because they are compared, it does not by any means mean that this video would reach the success of Thriller or have a "legacy" (although Telephones music video is definitely popular!). I think that the Telephone article is completely fine with the music video section, because while the video section does take up some space, the article is not anywhere near the point where it needs to be split due to length. This is all just my view of the topic.
2437:
radio stations promo copies). But simply being added to radio rotation does not make a song a single. This is why
Billboard has airplay and sales charts in the first place, because of formats like AOR (album-oriented rock) that emerged in the 1970s, which would favor album cuts instead of singles. Being played by lots of radio stations has never been a criteria which defines a single (other factors do), and that's why this song's airplay debut needs to be taken out of the equation.
439:
Beyonce did not release the song as a single, Lady Gaga did, so how is it a "Beyonce single"?!?. If you add it to the infobox then you also must go to
Beyonce's discography page and add it and its chart positions to her singles section because that is exactly what you are implying by having her chronology on the song's page. If Beyonce wants to have the song on her album and release it herself, then by all means add it, but that is not what is going on here.
1554:" are good examples because they are relatively young articles and provide plenty of detail in their size. Articles with massive lead sections look messy. There is also significant enough scope to include a song structure/concept section as almost all of the second para' in the intro is all about the song's core structure. I don't edit other lady Gaga articles but im going by the standards that i've encountered and been taught whilst editing other songs. (
6054:. First of all, the video is an entire short film that the song is only a component of. The script, sets, costumes, dialogue, etc. are entirely not the song and inappropriate for such detail in the song article Already inherently these are separate topics. Secondly, in relation to the first point, there is fare too much video topic-specific content by reliable sources to be appropriate in the song article. Arguably, the video article can be much
31:
2419:(Outdent)Disagree. There have been lots of instances of airplay only singles. Natalie Imbruglia's "Torn" comes to mind. It was a massive airplay hit, but wasnot allowed to chart on the Hot 100, untill the physical single was released. Same with the Goo Goo Dolls song "Iris". It depends on what methodology the compiler of thechart uses. BB now uses all three factors to measure in a song's position, while OCC only factor digital+physical.
283:
song was released as a single by
Beyonce as well, hence "Beyonce singles chronology" which is incorrect. The same is true for Beyonce's song "Video Phone". It is Beyonce featuring Lady Gaga. Gaga did not release the song as her single so it cannot be listed as a single in the chronology section. Also consider that both artists have not included each other's songs on their own albums and this is because they are only featured.
6000:. Recent attention is no indication of long term notability. As far as I know, the only music video to have its own article on Knowledge is Thriller, which was released in 1983 and continues to be popular today. If this music video is popular in ten years, let alone 27, the discussion should be revisited. Length wise, the readable prose size of the article is only 16 kb; 30 kb is recommended before a split.
4098:. In this clip, I noticed the following: 1.34: Lady Gaga Bose earphones (Minor one) 2.08: Virgin Mobile 2:17, the cans of diet coke in her hair. 2.17: The Chanel Glasses (Minor one) 4.17: LG Phone 4.24: HP computer and red logo 4.27: Plenty of fish dating website 4.56: Sandwich. 5.14: Soft Drink. 5.45: Polaroid 6.20: Wonder Bread 6.39: Miracle Whip 7.50: Coor Light 8.32: Polaroid 8.38: Chevy SS
4235:
far too much about what is completely irrelevant towards her life. In other words Sandy Rios isn't any sort of critic, in which case if she was her acceptance in the "critical reception" area would not be debated. Her opinions of the video are equal to that of everyone else's in value the only exception was that she got to broadcast hers on Nat'l television.
4373:
3787:
1710:
live performances are tools of promoting the song or album, which I believe are secondary in contrast to how the song has been received by peers, scholars and critics. I believe that factor in the commercial prospect of the song a lot, hence they are kept before any promo tools. I believe that's how the GA articles shape themselves nowadays.
6280:
a couple of years down the line they yes maybe. but currently the video section needs to be reduced because it is excessive. it is fully of different media outlet quotes each stating roughly the same thing. Rather than writing out paragraph for each quote maybe just paraphrasing the relevant points is more appropriate.?
6032:
All the things that you think should be mentioned are pure trivia: costumes and its reflection to celebrities (I don't understand what that means) and the references to movies. Those things are pure trivia, Knowledge ir not a place for trivia, is a place for real information. On the other hand, it is
4061:
Throughout the clip I was very surprised by the amount of product placement that appears in a very clear and forward manner. It's not only in the number of products (we counted 11 references: Christian
Louboutin, virgin mobile, LG, Kraft, Channel, Tom Ford, Coke, Polaroid, Miracle whip, Wonder Bread,
3761:
There is an inconsistency in the way "Gaga" is stylized, in the "Synopsis" section under "Music Video" subtitle. Personally, I think it should be stylized as "Gaga", as opposed to "GaGa" as this is what is used in the main Lady Gaga article and the "Telephone" video itself. I am unable to edit it.
2584:
It is a promo cover for sure. At the moment its the closest we have to a proper cover. But the video's producer said on uStream that the single cover would be once of the still images from the video shoot. It is normal practise for songs to use a promo cover and then a proper single cover is released
2377:
If it's counted as a release in the UK but not in the US, it's still a release. Remember, we're taking a broad worldview. It seems pretty straightforward to me. Just because a song isn't released (or isn't considered) as a single in one country doesn't make it not a single at all. A good pre-digital
6279:
just to pick up on the point made immediately above... the only video to have its own article is "Thriller" which as been around for over 10 years and influenced many other artists and has had tributes etc. i dont think anyone is going to tribute this video. if this video is still being talked about
6191:
is indeed being used far more strongly here. Oakshade you are just making wrong points about the policies. Nothing about the song is recentism, as facts prsent have already happened. However, things like legacy and *insert fan's blah blah* doesnot come in a week and is the case with this one. I hope
5610:
Celebartion!?!?!?! I am not seeing a national or global "telephone video release day" anywhere near! Not every person in this world is a gaga fan, if those are celebrating and were waiting for it to came out, ok, but have its own article just because gagas fans want it, it silly. I'm sure there must
5563:
There has been much anticipation and celebration over its release. The production and promotion and the detailed meaning that Gaga is trying to convey will very well take many words to describe. Also, as this has already started the massive amount of text is unsightly and I suggest that a summary be
4234:
I'm sure there are people like that but its not
Knowledge's job to cater to their needs. A proper source would be someone with capability for artistic judgment who also might have an actual job by some institution to be an "art critic", not some republican wacko Fox News reject who obviously worries
4200:
and the president of the
Culture Centre, who calls the video "disgusting" and "poison for our kids" (or something along those lines). It was removed by Legolas, with the reasoning that it was a bad reference, but I have re-added it, as I feel that while the publisher isn't great, the main content is
3864:
in which I changed the 'harpsichord' to 'harp', some user revert my edit quoting a source that says harpsichord. Clearly, the cited source is wrong. Anyone who are familiar with harp and harpsichord can tell the difference! The problem is how do I make the edit without being caught in a revert game?
2899:
yes but, it is still the "remix EP" and the single is already been released in some countries (like france) with the other artwork. MTV are only interested in that cover art, becuase the artwork on american iTunes is almost always different to the rest of thw world, becuase they usually only release
2861:
Why is the remix ep cover posted on the article? None of the other remix ep covers for her other singles are posted. It's not necessary to have it present on the article. So it should be removed or her other singles that have a different cover for their remix ep should be posted onto their articles.
2700:
Assuming that Gaga's German site doesn't say it is a promo cover, we have to use it. The cover has been revealed and whether they change it later or people think it is a promo cover is irrelevant. Right now that is the official cover. If they change it later, so be it, we can change ours too, but as
1568:
I'm siding with Candyo32 here. Obviously the leads you have come across have not been up to par. The lead of this article was mostly written by the same person who wrote the leads for several GAs (props to
Legolas). Referring to small articles which you wrote is not convincing. This article is large
968:
The two supposed sources supporting the rumor that
Britney Spears was going to be the original guest vocalist are completely unreliable. The Pop Justice source doesn't say Spears' name once and it's a pretty informal review. The other source says absolutely nothing about there being a guest vocalist
690:
A number of reviews, media sources reportedly said that this was decided as the second single long back. However, I admit the ARIA source needs to be updated as it is invalid now. According to sources, Gaga is creating a music video with
Beyonce for the song, so I believe it is indeed releasing as a
668:
In the LEAD, it states that the song is the second single from the album. This has not been confirmed. There is no coverage to verify such. There was a 'chartifacts' published by ARIA on
November 30 stating it was but I think a better source is required. Perhaps because it was receiving mass airplay
5491:
This music video has acquired loads of media attention and public discussion. It's also very controversial, and with all the influences and ads in it, there's not way it can be organized in a nice, fashionable, appealing way on the "Telephone" single page. And enough with Thriller, you don't know
3104:
an indicator of when a song actually debuts on radio, because radio stations can add a track before or after the "going for adds" date, or not even add it at all. "Going for adds" is nothing more than the record industry equivalent of a suggested playlist-add date, intended so that a track or album
2358:
If you use the charting issue date, two situations arise. Firstly, release dates will invaribly be the album release date as this is what the OCC in the UK allow. Secondly, in the US, a song could get airplay (and this counts to the charting issue) but never be available to buy in any form. I think
1709:
I believe whatever SunCreator did is fair enough. The lead was going to increase only, not decrease. More will be added regarding the commercial aspect, music video and live performance as time flies. Regarding Sun's quote that music video comes before reception, I disagree because, music video and
908:
I simply donot understand what the bomb-rush in adding such info to the article baked by such unreliable sources? Its the same thing happening in the past with the older Gaga articles. Too much of fancrufty additions go on making these bunch of articles the impossible bunch to look after. Why can't
707:
It was confirmed as a single a long time back. Almost as the fame monster album was first released and before this article existed. What has never been made clear is whether it is the second, third, fourth or whatever release. The other confirmed release is Speakless. There will be another but seen
326:
The key is in "featured" which is widely reported by sources. It is not a duet where each artist contributes in the same manner. It is a song by Lady Gaga with some additional vocals by Beyonce. If Beyonce chooses to release the song as her own single then sure adding her chronology is fine, but as
282:
There is no guideline saying that whatever singer is included in a song gets their chronology in the infobox. Since this song is Lady Gaga featuring Beyonce and was released as a Lady Gaga single, not a Beyonce single, Beyonce should not have her chronology in the infobox. Doing so implies that the
2221:
Actually no. Suppose a song is released to the compiler on January 25, the current chart being February 1. However, the song fared badly commercially and didnot chart untill the February 15 issue. Hence in that case, compiler gives the release as February 15, XXXX, which is incorrect. Hence I said
1987:
Well we can't add the airplay date in infobox as its not a physical release. Then again if we add airplay date in the release history table, that contradicts the infobox as the release date is the earliest one and generally airplay dates are earlier than physical release dates. Hence, the point is
1728:
I believe it's good practice for the order of the lead to match the order or the sections in the body, but as it seems your saying that is not the case then I'm fine with the order of sections however you want. So then the issue becomes the order of the sentences in the lead itself, as it could be
1587:
The lead in the article seems better then the example above. I favour: Definition sentence, Background two sentences, Composition two sentences, Critical reception one sentence, Chart performance one sentence, Music video one sentence, Charts and certifications one sentence. There is some fluff in
6080:
Well, as a matter of fact I don't think anyone near heard something like "The new Gaga's short film with the song "Telephone" at the background". IT IS a music video, very long and very pretentious, but is a music video. And we must remember that most of that information is repetitive and clearly
3707:
I really think someone should add a list of references in the video. Aside from the obvious, like the Pussy Wagon, the more notable one is the list of poisons used: There's one from Dune (Meta-Cyanide), one from Star Wars (Fex-M3) and one from Commander & Conquer (Tiberium). They're pretty
438:
Just because there are other instances does not mean it is right. There is no guideline that says any singer in who appears in a song gets their chronology on the page. The title for the chronology clearly says "Beyonce singles chronology". We simply cannot have it because it does not make sense.
6382:
between having the article and making it a redirect. There is absolutely no consensus to split the music video information into its own article at this time. This is probably going to be a long phase, but please keep discussion going to form a proper consensus as to split or keep the information
5914:
Regardless of length, a music video is created from the song. And in its current format, the music video section fits very well into the body of the song article. I see no reason as to why the music video is so important to the world that it warrants its own page. Using the same logic, any music
4266:
In the music video, she is seen dancing in what appears to be an american themed bra and panty set. I say appears, because at some times it seems that she's actually wearing paint. I can only view very low quality versions of the video here at work, and have a 1080p version waiting for me to get
2436:
That doesn't contradict what I said. I said "airplay =/= single". This is true. Receiving radio airplay does not automatically make a song a single. As someone who's worked in college radio, I can emphatically substantiate this. Yes, there are "airplay singles" (usually facilitated by giving
1423:
My third example has been edited since and hence it is no longer a good lead section. i disagree with your above comment. The lead goes into to much detail about the song's content. The opening sentence should outline the song and its album. The second sentance its release date and writers. Then
1479:
The lyrics portray the singer as preferring the dance floor rather than answer her lover's phone calls. The song charted early due to digital sales upon the album's relase. It was reached top 20 in the U.S., Canada, Ireland and New Zealand and is currently impacting on other charts worldwide.
2531:
It is shown at Discogs as being a Promotional cover. The Release cover may not have been decided or created yet. So, I'm thinking that they are most likely using the Promotional cover as a placeholder. It will be confirmed as the SINGLE cover when the date arrives if they haven't changed the
258:
Why does it say the original guest vocalist was going to be Britney Spears? The cited source, Popjustice, only says that "The guest vocalist on this was going to be someone else, but then the guest vocalist wanted to put the song on her own greatest hits album, so Lady Gaga made alternative
2739:
The first cover will be the european cover, like Bad Romance that has two covers, one for the european cd single and one for USA "The Remixes" cd single. For example why in Poker Face article there is the promo cover? I think we should put the first cover, also iTunes and hmv.com uses that
5818:
The fact that it is long, doesn't mean that it deserves its own articles. Dah! Anticipated??? By whom? Just Gaga's fans thought of it as a higly anticipated music video, no one else. It was not even mentioned on the news like an important thing or something like that, by anyone.
5034:
Not every music video or gaga song needs to have its own article. This is a encyclopedia for relevant information... relevant for a lot of people, not just for gaga's fans. The music video is irrelevant for a lot of people, it is not notable, it doesn't deserves its own article.
4483:
Since when did "CD" and "iTunes" become the only purchase options? Why should Apple get special mention when downloadable music is available from many different sources. I cannot see how this is justified. Unless perhaps someone from Apple has a special friend at Knowledge...
1377:
the content of the article. The lead section of the article actually contains length details which should be worked into other sections of the article like the background. Therefore the lead section needs to be reduced and rewritten to reflect wikipedia standards. see
4062:
Chevy) but also in the fact that the brands are very exposed, and that the action suddenly center around the product (for example, the sandwich scene in the car). I work in Marketing, I'm surprised nobody else has noticed this. What do you guys want to make of this?
385:
The single was released as "Lady Gaga featuring Beyonce", so that's why Beyonce's chronology is included in the infobox. Including Beyonce's chronology isn't saying that it's actually her single... Featured artists' chronologies are always on infoboxes. Examples:
1834:
This one doesnot have a digital release date yet, its the album version which is flying on iTunes. We have the R&R add date but no physical release dates have been announced, except UK, and that too according to Digital Spy, which is considered unreliable.
3814:
Right now the whole "Release and reception" section (and a lot of other parts, too) is a mess due to the amount of quotes. Some of those quotes are up to 800 characters long. You can barely make out where the quoting starts and ends. They need to be reduced
2183:"Number 3 is really invalid, since different compilers have different release dates for their chart". No, actually. The charts are regionally based; regardless of region, first is first. Simply go with the earliest release date used by any national chart.
2451:
I agree that Airplay does not make a song a single. The above discussion was about the validity or not of using a charting issue date. If(!) you use a charting issue date then because airplay can make it chart then airplay can become the release date.
2310:(woops Legolas said it) I guess from your original comment "It should be when it's released for sale." you favour option 1 - but do you realise that these days that is effectively when the album is released as that is when songs mostly go for sale.
1636:
Seems obvious when you write the lead that the music video section should be before the critical review. The artist is in charge of the personal selection, composition and video. The critical reception and charts are indirect things done by others.
4905:. I don't understand why all the comments are coming off comparing it to Thriller. I think that it should be an article in it's own right because of all the lengthy information and media coverage and reaction is enough to warrant its own article.
3955:
The scene in the desert, at the end of the clip, may be a reference to the movie Thelma and Louise. The plan where they hold their hands is almost exactly the same. (Watch any "ending scene" from Thelma and Louise on Youtube or watch the movie.)
3135:
Also, I have to question listing release dates in the table for formats that haven't been issued yet. These releases haven't happened yet, and we can't predict the future (you never know if a release will be cancelled, and we're not a news site).
4452:
He isn't allowed to edit Knowledge, and the editor that made the change was unaware that he was being solicited by a banned user. If you believe the change to be good, will take responsibility for its accuracy, and meet the criteria laid out at
5981:. A lot of the information is simply quote or copied and duplicated. It could be easily cut down. But either way there is little justification for splitting the article into a music video page and a song page. it really isn't necessary.
4853:
I definitely don't think the video is in any way able to compare to "Thriller". However I do believe the video should get it's own page coming in second to "Thriller". It also has a lot of information, all of which is useful and needed.
880:, it states that tweets are largely not acceptable. However, it may be an exception if we follow the statement made by Iknow23. The problem is, Laurie Ann Gibson does not seem to have an official website, and her Twitter account is not
860:
for example, it can still be shown even if removed at Twitter. Just make sure that the Twitter page is visited by clicking on a link at the artist's or record label's website so you know it is an 'official' Twitter account that you are
1310:
Could this be explained: "Initially offered to singer Britney Spears, the song was inspired by Gaga's fear of suffocation" The song was offered to Spears, but was inspired by Gaga?? Reference supporting and/or explaining this, please?
5384:
As expansive as the information on this video is, it's still relevant to "Telephone" as a single. I think it works just as well as part of the "Telephone" page, if not better, since the information is in one place as opposed to two.
5326:
find the person who did it :/. Otherwise I would have and if I restored them, I would have to remove all recent posts otherwise it would say "edit cannot be undone". I've informated "Legolas" of the problem so he should sort it out.
1326:
References are in the article(currently 4,5,6 and 7). Don't just read the lead! It was written by Gaga for Spears. Gaga was inspired by to write it by her fear of suffocation. The lead sentence requires a tidy up to make this clear.
3120:
Glad you cleared that up. I added the reference but not after hunting to find another. I used that as it's used on some other articles. Rihanna's Rude Boy being one. It seems likely then that we don't have a Wp:RS for airplay then.
6243:
Some are saying that the video section is very important for the article, and it's obvious. But it's also obvious that there is still going to be the Video section, it's just going to be smaller, a summary of the new article.
5229:
Well, I remember that both Hilary Duff's "With Love" and Britney Spears' "Break The Ice" say at the end of the video "To be continuad...", and as far I everyone concern, none of those supposed continuations have been done. See
306:. On the other hand "Telephone" is being billed as Lady Gaga & Beyonce, more than a featured artist. Hence I definitely think that Beyonce's chronology should be here in this article, but Gaga should be removed from "
2386:" is routinely cited as the most-played song of all time on radio, but it was never a single. I really want to refrain from getting into a detailed history of how radio actually works, but trust me, airplay =/= single.
4638:
Gussing this is because, like me, I hated the video at first, but then everyone started loving it, which changed the direction the reviews were going. Either that or someone who hates Lady GaGa edited it in falsely
5474:, Thriller is an iconic video that has been around for over 30 years and is still famous. This video came out yesterday, there's enough info there now, if people stop adding misc info then there won't be a problem.
3180:
As I explained, the link to cite the airplay debut doesn't actually verify when it debuted on radio (only when the record company asked people to start playing it), hence why I removed it. A "going for adds" date
3099:
used for the song's airplay debut in Release history table. "Going for adds" is a music industry term that labels use to inform radio stations of when they want radio stations to music to their playlists. It is
4688:. I think this should be included in the Track Listing/Format section or somewhere else in the article. Alphabeat provided two remixes of Lady Gaga's song, but I think it's important that people know they also
5752:, as it is simply not worthwhile creating a whole article just for a single music video.. You could however create an article that includes the outlining of the concepts, inspiration, filming and reception of
4406:. People should be aware that he is trying to influence the article and having difficulty because of semiprotection. He has made the same request anonymously from a UAE IP address, which I have also reverted.—
370:
Getting credit here isn't the problem. It is labeling it as a single. It's a single, but not Beyonce's. We cannot have the infobox saying it is one of Beyonce's single because she did not release it as such.
2599:
Ok, just seen added to the article the Digital Release info for France in about a week and they are using the art. So this may be the Digital Release cover and the CD cover may still be different (as you
480:
It's not under singles, it's under as featured artist... If you make the chronology say "Beyonce featured songs chronology" then that is fine, but it is not a Beyonce single and cannot stay saying that.
341:
Beyonce will be equally credited for the song, if for eg this tops the Hot 100. Hence even f she is featured, commercially speaking she will get teh accolades for the song nonetheless. Its the same like
6144:, my dear. Coverage of the song and the video are equally recentism, my dear. But, my dear, coverage of the video is in fact much more in-depth and plentiful than the song, my dear. Completely blind
5733:
a separate article on precious Gaga. That doesnot mean that Knowledge will have to be a paper encyclopedia like they want. This is getting the same with every Gaga video, the same hype and everything.
298:
Ahh a little something to be considered here. "Video Phone" doesnot credit Gaga in any way, except for a remix. The original version is the one based on which the article is made. This is like saying "
5858:
I agree with Brad, on this. But I think the article should immediately be deleted, someone has created it before a consensus, somebody tried to fix the vote, this discussion has no more credibility.
5670:
before do that comparation about MJ's articles. If you want to do something to solve it, go and fight over a cleaning on the MJ's articles, but don't use that in favor of something that you do like.
1405:
I found the lead to be adequate. It summarizes the main points in the article without going into too much detail. Your third examples would imo (knowing the lead guidelines) be a far too short lead.
2900:
the remix EP in US (and some other contries). change all the lady gaga covers to the remix ep's if you like, but the orginal one is the one that should be there. (apeaboutsims) (cant login) Source:
4977:
It doesn't matter. It is not notable enough to have its own article. Besides, most of the information shown on the article is pure trivia, it can be remove to make a little bit short that section.
4267:
home, so i'l confirm it then. If it's true that she's not wearing anything, i think we should note it, because it would certainly change the tone of the paragraph mentioning the "intersex rumors"
576:
yes we need a little bit more than that? like a tracklisting, or even a reference :)Im not suprised becuase it's on the radio and there has got to be a promo out by now. but we need a reference--
4015:
Can't do it yet, the archived source hasn't listed it yet so I can't use the source you gave because after time the song gets pushed down and off. I will put it there when the archive updates.
5729:
Legacy? Laughable. The video is not even out for a week. Why are we even having a discussion when most of the user's posting tend to add up fancruft in the article? Of course most here would
2546:
You're thinking that, but do you know that for sure? It appears to be the only official cover we have, and Lady Gaga's German site is using it. I see no reason to not have it on the article.
6225:. Knowledge is an encyclopedia. Just because the music industry is writing as much as they can about this singular video right now does not make it notable for its own article on Knowledge.—
1891:
In my imagination most people look at the infobox first. If you add it to the lead, some people reading the lead may think it conflicts with the infobox and thus change one or the other.
2105:
Number 3 is really invalid, since different compilers have different release dates for their chart. We should ponder on how we can tweak the definition of Number 2 and get a consensus.
1853:
So what as you refer to above is the "edit warring on this issue here"? I was under the impression you created that discussion on WikiProject Songs as you wished to add an airplay date?
6096:
2684:" etc. Let's wait for a few days untill an official cover is released. As per sources, the video release is on mid-Feb and the song is added, hence the cover should be coming any day.
4999:: If it is though, I think it should be combined with the "Paparazzi" video since "Telephone" is a continuation of it, and it's obvious that the story will continue in a later video.
1695:
I started off trying to cut things down but now after various edits by us all it slightly larger then before. Well at least it says more. Hopefully Lil-unique1 will be understanding.
1091:
This song has been released on the radios =S I heard it on CHUM FM this morning, it was one of their 'new songs of the week' o_o Bad Romance just came out a month and a half ago...
4131:
3685:
2069:
These interpretation are different in the detail and there are exceptions. Personally I feel that leaving it out of the infobox entirely reduces edit warring and is the way forward.
5197:
That is true that the "Alejandro" video is based on rumors, but the ending of "Telephone" says "To be continued..." so their is obviously going to be a continuation video sometime.
1065:
On GagaDaily, it says that the plot of Telephone will be a continuation from Paparazzi and that they were searching for lots of prison inmates and Gaga & Beyonce body doubles.
2570:
It is definitely an 'official' PROMOTIONAL cover. As the single release is a future event, the cover art is subject to change. Do you know for sure that this will be the one used?—
6192:
you can see clearly what reasons many of those who agreed on the split. its either "it's very iconic" and "it's over 10 mins long". I beleive I don't need to comment any further.
6120:
my dear. The video was just released a week ago. Every news article would point to it. That doesnot mean its having an OMGZZZZZ impact. Let's not put our emphasis on google news.
5492:
how this music video could impact music in the future. No one does. The purpose of Knowledge is to show how it has/is currently impacting the world, and let me tell you, it has.
2990:
Removed the CD single entirely for now. I'm not so sure it was pushed back as the only original reference for the date was facebook. Do you want to add the new date in light of
2024:
I don't see where anything says that the infobox release date needs to be an "able to buy date". The date that the song was "released" to radio stations makes complete sense.
5841:
as per Legolas' rationale. I see someone went ahead and made the split without a consensus. No doubt one of the many sock farms trolling all the Lady Gaga related articles.
2971:
4661:
Why is the only negative review in the reception part of the video section some nut on FNC saying it's poisoning kids and not all the people saying it just plain sucks? --
3834:
Yes. And I reduced it drastically. Each and everyone of them were completely copying the reviews, hence plagiarising. Knowledge is strict against such plagiarising users.
6221:
There is no bloody reason to have a separate article just on this music video. The fact that there is so much on the video at this time is exactly what Legolas2186 says.
4211:
for now. Generally I feel we should note that while the song has received critical acclaim, there is a significant number of people who find the video to be tasteless. -
3164:
Unfortunately that GFA is the only thing we have as an airplay date or something. I agree with both of you regarding the unreleased, upcoming remixes etc being listed.
143:
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not.
1870:
No, I wanted everyone that was putting January 26, 2010 (a Radio add date) in the infobox as Release date to STOP. The Radio add info can remain in the article lead.
1003:"It's funny when you think about it, this song which was offered to Britney for her last album and would have been one of the best songs on it, but was knocked back,
2968:
in the release history section , in the United States, change the release date of the CD Single of Telephone -The remixes from February 26, 2010 to March 30, 2010.
4438:
Although i certainly don't agree with his apparent motives, what was wrong with the request? If the information is still valid and appropriate, why was it removed?
2934:
sorry, i was actually talking about the remix cover being placed insted of the single cover. but someone has noticed its a fake now so alls well. (apebaoutsims) --
4330:
1665:
The lead now is very good and the way it needs to be. I just fixed something minor in the Spears/Beyonce sentence, and edited the music video part just a little.
133:
3073:
The CD Single for the UK release is avalible for pre-order. It has been for a while, but now it has a tracklisting. should this be placed in the article? SOURCE:
5949:
That's your opinion, not fact. Knowledge is not a crystal ball. As of right now the music video does not need it's own article because it's not notable enough.
5756:
of her music videos together, since they are considered to be so "epic." An article on just one or two of the videos is not necessary. That is just my thought.
1424:
third and fourth sentences should give other important information about its release. such lead sections as this have more info than some of the main sections.
4774:
In a piece written by the Guardian (front page of the paper today) it was compared to Jackson's Thriller, I think the video deserves a wiki page of it's own.
2901:
730:
Is there any proof that Lady GaGa is creating a video for the single?? There's only been confirmation for the video of Alejandro, the NEXT single in line...
88:
1802:
Iknow23, could you post the release date information you have for this single. Like the US digital release date, US airplay date or whatever you have. With
2141:
The French digital release date February 15, 2010 should be used in the infobox. That is the date when the song was first individually available for sale.
5341:
I'm not sure if this will matter, but at the time I posted my vote, the count was five in favor, four against. Does that help in trying to sort this out?
3225:
redirecting to it, should be created explaining this music industry term? When these things are then discussed in articles, they can be wikilinked to it.—
1516:, etc, etc. Telephone is a pretty detailed article, and the introduction needs to reflect that. The current does that, without going into extreme detail.
3609:
Now it's number one .. you MUST add this table ! Go to the wiky tik tok page ... you will see billboard pop song chart number one succeded by Telephone
602:
but when Spears wanted to put the song on her own greatest hits album, Gaga made alternative arrangements and made Knowles the featured vocalist instead.
5894:
No. It should not. I have redirected the article to the music video of this one. Cannot believe within one night the amount of fancruft that was added.
5402:
i think even though the discussion of the proccess and then release of the video it is still extremely relevant to this article and should be included
5162:. "Paparazzi", "Telephone" & "Alejandro" are all gonna be connected so a page based on all those as one film would be extremely useful and needed.
4403:
1942:
It should be when it's released for sale. Songs are issued to radio before being sold for promotional purposes. That's how the music industry works.
1501:'s chosen as the high standard of Knowledge. I don't understand why this is being brought up anyway, if the article is going by the standard of other
6169:
happen. There is nothing in that guideline that states an article should be written because one should not believe that its notability may diminish.—
2292:
And why couldn't the charting issue date be used? If that's how the publications determine releases for songs, then it's a valid method to consider.
1538:
I will disagree once again "4 Minutes" has been out a very long time and so could warrant an intro of that size. I am going on the rules provided at
3328:
745:
Laurie Ann Gibson, the person whochoreographed LoveGame & Paparazzi confirmed on her twitter that she would do a video with Gaga & Beyonce;
92:
5284:
Erm excuse me but everyone who's disagreed has been deleted, this has become a vandalised discussion to make it go in favour of the "agree" side.
3199:
Is there such a thing as a site that reports the Radio adds AFTER they have occurred? That would be best of course as the past cannot be changed.—
1787:. Please feel free to join the discussion there. PLEASE in order to get as much input as possible, PLEASE make ALL your replies there. THANK YOU.—
499:
because changing the norm in this article should imply a change of 1000's of other articles. A better solution is to post this discussion at the
390:
3486:
Guys ..you have forgotten to add the pop song chart ... go to the billboard official website and you wil discover it's at position number three
137:
4888:, by the success of 'Thriller', nothing tells us that this go to have the same impact. Furthermore, it should be treated like all other items.
1249:
113:
4711:
The video section is getting rather large with more and more sources arriving by the minute. How about it having a seperate article? Regards,
3860:
The song starts off unassumingly, with Gaga singing in a solemn voice over a harpsichord melody, which changes immediately to a pounding beat.
162:
Right, you guys expect me everytime to make the Alejandro page, yet you all turn it into a redirect, this hasn't been confirmed as a single.
6332:
212:
948:
Fan sites are not reliable sources and you say there is a 'rumor' regarding the director's name. "Encyclopedic content must be verifiable."—
6245:
5198:
4855:
4781:
4511:
automatically assume that something is not what it seems? The iTunes Store is merely the best source for information on digital downloads.—
4282:
I have the 1080 version, and it's still not clear, but my personal guess is that there is material there, but that there's paint as well. -
3769:
3739:
3663:
3299:
1072:
2272:
I'm don't believe the OCC have any sort of published release/chartng issue date. Can you provide any instant of the OCC doing that with a
795:
Where is policy saying Twitter is unreliable source? There are a number of significant articles on wikipedia using Twitter as a source.
5386:
5067:
4754:
4662:
4646:
4582:"The music video ... received general negative reviews and it is currently #1 on Billboard's '2010 Current Most Horrible Music Videos'."
4357:
4242:
3689:
3393:
3077:
2935:
2905:
2360:
1137:
649:
169:
4944:: The video is, for all intents and purposes, a standalone short film, and as it is it's taking up way too much space on this article.
3910:
The song starts slowly with some tuneful harp playing, but don't be fooled because a chunky dance beat soon kicks in to get you moving.
5652:
5499:
5439:
4367:
signs) at the end. This will add your name, and the date and time. You can also do this by clicking the 'sign' button, pictured here.
4126:
3963:
1010:
985:
6148:
speculation on the future lower notability of either the song or the video is not a basis for deciding Knowledge content, my dear.--
4725:
Agree. -The section in this article is too long and complicated. -It's a continuation of Paparazzi and a possible 3rd video. User:
4348:
3510:
1276:
1178:
Correct in what way? It's unreferenced in the article. In remains unreleased to my knowledge, current downloads are from the album.
1098:
731:
362:
5564:
but on the page about the single and a linked provided for the more detailed explanation as has been done before. Regards,Shelisa
248:
2764:". Can we source this article with a reliable source to say it's a single. The only current sources I can see(hmv/digitalspy) are
998:
4113:
The product placement has actually attracted a lot of coverage in reliable sources, and it might be worth adding to the article.
2615:
1906:
1784:
537:
2680:
I disagree. Prmo covers are later replaced by something better (or worse), this was what happened in the article "[[LoveGame", "
4627:
4499:
Because the iTunes Store is the main share holder in the legal digital music distribution field? Not every Amazon store has an
1502:
71:
66:
4121:
932:
It says that Lady Gaga filmed the video for Thelephone on January 28 2010. And the director is rumoured to be Jonas Ă…kerlund (
6095:
Actually I wouldn't have even known about this song if it wasn't for the video. By far the vast majority of coverage on the
4797:
4530:
4045:
4004:
3024:
2980:
405:
4922:
Those lengthy discussions are nothing but undue additions. In light of the video being released they can be easily removed.
1729:
re-ordered to make it more readable without unnecessary switching between subject matter and thus have more new paragraphs.
2902:
http://www.amazon.fr/gp/product/B0037E9UWU/ref=sr_1_album_49_rd?ie=UTF8&child=B0037EBYVK&qid=1266915444&sr=1-49
5580:
4893:
3723:
3449:
3411:
3096:
266:
1909:
that the Radio add date is NOT the 'singles' release date. However Radio add dates may be mentioned in the article text.—
3324:
6059:
5453:
And??? What is the point of that information? We all know that, but that is not enough to create a separated article.
3468:
3017:
is a very reliable source, so you should go according with the reliable source, which is Amazon, which says March 30.
6259:
No, the issue is that there should not be a new article and all of the information on the video should remain here.—
2721:
5953:
5811:
5553:
5520:
5363:
4529:
I agree with the original poster. Why are we labelling 'UK iTunes Single', when it's not retailer specific single.
4322:
4201:
a video straight from Fox News. I don't really know how to go about finding the original video, so I've just added
2681:
1489:
This lead is no way too long. Also, the articles named above shouldn't even be used as examples. Good examples are
1316:
1245:
38:
5807:
and how is this video "one of the most anticipated videos of the decade"?!? The decade only began two months ago!
4684:
released a cover (song, not album art) mixing (or mashup?) "Telephone" and "Bad Romance." You can listen to it on
3053:
Facebook is not a reliable source, hence my above not being sure about the assertion which was based on facebook.
236:
103:
article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
6355:
6299:
6086:
6038:
5965:
5824:
5675:
5616:
5594:
Really? A music video usually takes this much of time only. Fan's anticipation has nothing to do with Knowledge.
5532:
5458:
5346:
5304:
Your quite right, an IP removed some. Can you restore them. As someone who added the split tag I feel a bit of a
5271:
5239:
5185:
5143:
5104:
5040:
4982:
4949:
4873:
4840:
3020:
2976:
2515:
lady-gaga.de IS Lady Gaga's official german site. Therefore, the image should be placed back into the article. --
216:
6336:
4889:
4785:
3874:
3719:
2061:
Release date it becomes chart eligible according to defintion of national chart compilers (Billboard, OCC, etc)
1490:
754:
387:
260:
99:'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for
6350:
Good for you! But just because an unregistered user "thinks" that, means that we have to split the article...
6249:
5202:
4859:
3905:
3773:
3743:
3667:
3303:
1076:
5960:
Will be remembered??? By whom??? How do you know that??? Neither we nor Knowledge cannot predict the future.
3931:
seem to get the weather right! Billboard are very reliable; I have changed it back to harpsichord from harp.
3693:
3397:
3081:
3037:
The page is no longer protected, but you should ty to reach consensus on the change before you implement it.
2939:
2909:
1907:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Songs#Singles release date is when FIRST being SOLD as a Single, NOT Radio Airplay
1785:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Songs#Singles release date is when FIRST being SOLD as a Single, NOT Radio Airplay
1141:
653:
173:
6375:
5656:
5503:
5390:
5126:
5071:
4758:
4666:
4650:
4246:
3967:
3320:
2088:
393:
5611:
be some kind of "gaga wikia" where gaga's fans can create immensity of unnecessary articles for Knowledge.
1241:
1102:
5695:
5435:
5057:: It is quite obvious that this video will create a wave in popular culture that deserves its own page. ]
4443:
4305:
4272:
3441:
2083:
Number 1 is ok for an Album track and would be the same date as the Album release. For these we would use
1014:
981:
581:
346:", 10000000 of Timbaland's songs, Jay-Z's 10000000 of featured appearances as well as 100000 of T-pain's.
5932:
definately, it is a famous video and will be remembered, and I say make the Thriller video seperate too!
4094:
Undue weightage? This and the brand appearing clearly on the screen are what you would usually define as
6408:
6317:
6285:
6201:
6129:
5986:
5950:
5903:
5808:
5786:
5742:
5716:
5603:
5550:
5517:
5360:
5092:
5027:
4970:
4931:
4730:
4344:
4173:
4086:
4041:
4000:
3893:
3884:, an extreme reliable source. If you want to change, you need to add a reliable source as strong as BB.
3843:
3655:
3614:
3593:
3574:
3562:
3543:
3531:
3506:
3491:
3363:
3190:
3173:
3141:
3110:
2927:
2892:
2848:
2829:
2814:
2693:
2627:
2590:
2442:
2428:
2391:
2297:
2235:
2188:
2114:
2084:
2043:
2009:
1997:
1978:
1966:
1947:
1844:
1719:
1559:
1429:
1395:
1354:
1312:
1272:
1050:
918:
780:
735:
700:
512:
358:
319:
47:
17:
5576:
5431:
4340:
3538:
Next week it will be N1 ... could you add pop 100 number one single on the table with dance club play?
977:
6033:
just a video, and is not THAT big for the world as "Thriller" is/was, so stop trying to use that one.
6023:
5915:
video which is mentioned on the news should qualify to receive its own independent Knowledge article
3610:
3570:
3539:
3502:
3487:
3259:
2666:
Agree also. I think it's a promo cover, but okay because it's official promo coming from lady-gaga.de
937:
6351:
6295:
6082:
6034:
6007:
5961:
5820:
5671:
5667:
5648:
5612:
5568:
5528:
5495:
5454:
5427:
5342:
5313:
5267:
5235:
5181:
5167:
5139:
5100:
5063:
5036:
4978:
4945:
4869:
4836:
4805:
4777:
4750:
4736:
4716:
4697:
4642:
4615:
4336:
4238:
4033:
3992:
3959:
3799:
3765:
3735:
3498:
3456:
3431:
3389:
3345:
3316:
3155:
3126:
3058:
2999:
2918:
Doesnot change the fact that a much more reliable source like MTV reported it, precides over Amazon.
2796:
2781:
2671:
2491:
2457:
2368:
2315:
2281:
2074:
1928:
1896:
1858:
1811:
1752:
1744:
1734:
1700:
1642:
1615:
1593:
1547:
1379:
1332:
1291:
1264:
1237:
1183:
1094:
1068:
1032:
973:
800:
713:
645:
632:
564:
411:
408:
350:
193:
165:
4099:
4063:
3925:
I live in Britain and you've got to admit they are not the most reliable source... for example they
2880:
929:
6383:
together. Should one form to split, feel free to contact me directly on my talk page. Thank you. —
6222:
6141:
6117:
5642:
5407:
4623:
4534:
4205:
4149:
4103:
4067:
4037:
3996:
3986:
3255:
2824:
By the way, I just wanted to say I'm glad the issue was resolved. Much respect to the both of you.
2379:
1551:
1543:
1383:
825:
is that specific tweets can be removed at any time, in a similar way to what occurs with videos on
750:
453:
244:
147:
5572:
5000:
4538:
3630:
2863:
2516:
6391:
6153:
6108:
6067:
5122:
4910:
4726:
4290:
4219:
3982:
Telephone has been accredited Platinum on the Australian Singles Chart. Can someone update this?
3378:
If it was written while "Circus" was being written, then that makes telephone the oldest song In
3246:
3042:
2383:
1670:
1521:
1476:
who also has a feature vocal on the song. It officially impacted U.S. radio on January 26, 2010.
1387:
933:
307:
1473:
3522:
No. Its a component chart which is not included if the song has alrady charted on the Hot 100.
999:
http://www.popjustice.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4211&Itemid=243
399:
6266:
6232:
6188:
6176:
6162:
6145:
5863:
5766:
5691:
5479:
5332:
5289:
5231:
5212:
5005:
4557:
4518:
4439:
4301:
4268:
4095:
4020:
3635:
3267:
3230:
3204:
2991:
2868:
2765:
2706:
2656:
2605:
2575:
2537:
2521:
2151:
2096:
2029:
1914:
1881:
1825:
1820:
Sorry,, I don't really have that. I've been like a fact-checker, rather than a fact-gatherer.—
1792:
1574:
1410:
953:
894:
866:
839:
679:
616:
577:
545:
486:
444:
376:
332:
288:
3629:
The synopsis for the music video is not good at all. It needs to be cleaned up by someone. --
969:
before Knowles in the first place. I'm taking this down unless it can actually be verified.
6400:
6309:
6281:
6193:
6121:
5982:
5937:
5895:
5778:
5734:
5708:
5595:
5084:
5019:
4962:
4923:
4823:
4602:
4489:
4165:
4116:
4078:
3936:
3916:
3885:
3870:
3835:
3647:
3585:
3554:
3523:
3383:
3355:
3186:
3165:
3137:
3106:
2919:
2884:
2840:
2825:
2806:
2685:
2623:
2586:
2438:
2420:
2387:
2293:
2227:
2184:
2106:
2039:
2005:
1989:
1974:
1958:
1943:
1836:
1711:
1555:
1425:
1391:
1346:
1268:
1042:
910:
772:
692:
504:
354:
311:
96:
81:
6058:
than the song one with the amount of coverage it has received from reliable sources. Like
5879:
The page was created, so the video section on this article must be resumed in a paragraph.
2058:
Release to buy but only as a single (note that definition of a 'single' is also not agreed)
1783:
Due to edit warring on this issue here and at other articles, the matter has been taken to
6165:
is a guideline that states one should not write articles about future events because they
6001:
5920:
5309:
5163:
4801:
4712:
4693:
4542:
4161:
3795:
3464:
3427:
3341:
3151:
3122:
3054:
2995:
2792:
2777:
2745:
2667:
2556:
2487:
2453:
2364:
2311:
2277:
2070:
1924:
1892:
1854:
1807:
1748:
1730:
1696:
1638:
1611:
1589:
1469:
1328:
1287:
1219:
1179:
1164:
1121:
1028:
796:
709:
628:
560:
500:
466:
424:
189:
185:
6399:
I am removing the split tag, as consensus suggests that the split should not take place.
5138:
This is not a votation. These people is not giving reasons against or favor the article.
4961:
Even Paparazzi was a stand-alone short film. Doesnot mean it shold have its own article.
4835:
This is not a votation. These people is not giving reasons against or favor the article.
3418:
with parts of Circus recorded before the Fame was done. Without knowing the dates of all
402:
240:
235:
They are not a good source for covers. They use often fan made covers from Coverlandia.
6410:
6393:
6359:
6340:
6319:
6303:
6289:
6272:
6253:
6238:
6203:
6182:
6157:
6131:
6112:
6090:
6071:
6042:
6012:
5990:
5969:
5955:
5941:
5924:
5905:
5888:
5867:
5850:
5846:
5828:
5813:
5788:
5771:
5744:
5718:
5699:
5679:
5638:
5620:
5605:
5584:
5555:
5536:
5522:
5516:"it has/is currently impacting the world, and let me tell you, it has." by what means?
5507:
5483:
5462:
5443:
5411:
5403:
5394:
5365:
5350:
5336:
5317:
5293:
5275:
5258:
5243:
5224:
5220:
5206:
5189:
5171:
5147:
5130:
5108:
5094:
5044:
5029:
5010:
4986:
4972:
4953:
4933:
4914:
4897:
4877:
4863:
4844:
4827:
4809:
4789:
4762:
4740:
4720:
4701:
4670:
4654:
4631:
4619:
4606:
4563:
4545:
4524:
4493:
4466:
4447:
4433:
4415:
4396:
4389:
4309:
4295:
4276:
4250:
4224:
4175:
4160:
It might be worth placng a line in the text, but listing all the products is defintely
4155:
4141:
4107:
4088:
4071:
4049:
4024:
4008:
3971:
3940:
3920:
3895:
3845:
3828:
3824:
3803:
3777:
3747:
3727:
3697:
3671:
3657:
3640:
3618:
3595:
3578:
3564:
3547:
3533:
3514:
3435:
3401:
3365:
3349:
3332:
3307:
3271:
3250:
3234:
3208:
3194:
3175:
3159:
3145:
3130:
3114:
3085:
3062:
3046:
3028:
3003:
2984:
2943:
2929:
2913:
2894:
2873:
2850:
2833:
2816:
2800:
2785:
2749:
2733:
2710:
2695:
2675:
2660:
2631:
2619:
2609:
2594:
2579:
2565:
2541:
2526:
2510:
2495:
2461:
2446:
2430:
2395:
2372:
2319:
2301:
2285:
2237:
2192:
2156:
2116:
2100:
2078:
2047:
2033:
2013:
1999:
1982:
1968:
1951:
1932:
1918:
1900:
1885:
1862:
1846:
1829:
1815:
1796:
1756:
1738:
1721:
1704:
1674:
1646:
1619:
1597:
1578:
1563:
1539:
1525:
1465:
1433:
1414:
1399:
1370:
1356:
1342:
1336:
1320:
1295:
1253:
1227:
1187:
1173:
1145:
1128:
1106:
1080:
1052:
1036:
1018:
989:
957:
941:
920:
899:
870:
844:
804:
782:
758:
739:
717:
702:
684:
657:
636:
620:
585:
568:
549:
514:
490:
475:
448:
433:
380:
343:
336:
321:
303:
292:
272:
220:
197:
177:
152:
144:
4692:
the song (as well as mixing it in with another of Lady Gaga's songs, "Bad Romance"),--
3298:
Is February 28th the accurate release date? Where have you heard this date confirmed?
230:
6384:
6149:
6104:
6063:
5305:
5255:
5180:
The Alejandro rumors are unconfirmed, let's leave that out of it for the time being.
4906:
4462:
4454:
4429:
4411:
4284:
4213:
3423:
3422:
songs then you can't say. And even if you knew all the dates it would be engaging in
3354:
Gagadaily said that its coming on March 8, 2010, but thats hardly a reliable source.
3242:
3038:
1666:
1517:
1494:
496:
4363:
When you leave messages, please remember to "sign" your name, by putting ~~~~ (four
3150:
Agree with that. It's WP:Crystalball. Another source of edit-warring unfortunately.
3074:
1284:
6379:
6260:
6226:
6170:
5880:
5859:
5757:
5475:
5328:
5285:
4551:
4512:
4016:
3263:
3226:
3200:
2773:
2702:
2652:
2601:
2571:
2533:
2475:
2273:
2142:
2092:
2052:
There are different camps of interpretation of the vague 'Release' date. It can be
2025:
1910:
1877:
1821:
1803:
1788:
1570:
1505:
1498:
1406:
949:
885:
877:
862:
830:
768:
670:
642:
There's nothing said about Britney wanting this song for her Greatest Hits album!
612:
541:
482:
440:
372:
328:
284:
5797:
It is one of the most anticipated videos of the decade and it's 10 minutes long.
2965:
Release date of the CD Single of Telephone - The Remixes pushed back to March 30
1610:
I'm going to have a go at amending it. Please feel to revert me if you disagree.
209:
5933:
4819:
4598:
4485:
4197:
3932:
3912:
3866:
2954:
Release date of the CD Single of Telephone - The Remixes pushed back to March 30
2722:
http://hmv.com/hmvweb/displayProductDetails.do?ctx=280;0;-1;-1;-1&sku=769292
1205:
559:
there was a promo of Telephone that i saw on the internet. we should list that--
396:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
6308:
I shortened quite a bit of the MV section. I believe it looks appropriate now.
4550:
Because the iTunes version is the only one with the music video added onto it.—
4356:
237:
http://coverlandia.blogspot.com/2009/11/lady-gaga-telephone-fanmade-single.html
91:
to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for
6434:
5916:
5527:
The world is not just the US! It is not impacting the world, just part of it.
4685:
4500:
3460:
3014:
2805:
ARIA confirmed it as single a long time ago. Its present in the article LEAD.
2741:
2730:
2725:
2549:
2507:
2502:
1513:
1210:
1157:
1114:
459:
417:
2762:
A single is a single if it is described as such by reliable secondary sources
1588:
the current lead but there is also missing a sentence on the video. Regards,
5842:
5420:
5216:
4681:
4611:
I think the Music Video should be kept on the Telehone page, not separated
4382:
4326:
3820:
3569:
No .. I mean .. will you do a table with the word "incumbent" "preceded by"
1457:
1025:
3906:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/cbbcnews/hi/newsid_8540000/newsid_8547700/8547789.stm
1134:
1152:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Telephone_(song)&oldid=331446043
119:"Music News, Reviews, Articles, Information, News Online & Free Music"
4458:
4425:
4407:
4193:
3445:
3419:
3415:
3379:
3010:
2479:
1509:
299:
4402:
I have undone the above edit, as Bottleofjag is almost certainly Brexx:
3684:
THe video, in fact, has more references to Pulp Fiction than Kill Bill.
1873:
Here is one of the many edits others made to put Airplay as Release date
1444:
Below is an example of what i think would be a better intro for the song
4189:
881:
857:
829:. In order to maintain a quality article, stable sources must be used.
826:
822:
6062:, the video has a life unto itself separate from the original song. --
2382:". And as I've said elsewhere, airplay doesn't make a song a single. "
6099:
is about the video, not the song. The facts back up the video being
3452:
was just a fiction of imagination. YZJay 12:19, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
2038:
Only if it's a radio-only track. Otherwise, you go by the sale date.
5777:
Actually I kind of like this idea of yours Brad. :) *buzzing light*
2308:
you said it's invalid - so somewhat confused by what you are saying.
600:
Additionally, the guest vocalist was originally going to be Spears,
3662:
Is it ok to write that paper gangsta was also played in the video?
1923:
Yes, I agree. There are many things that are not the release date.
259:
arrangements." Saying that it was Britney is a little WP:OR-ish. --
4364:
4325:
In the release history section, add that it will be released as a
3105:
can make a big debut on that week's tally for most added records.
1113:
Yea seriously, I have it on my iPhone.. why does it say Jan 2010?
5805:
can not have it's own article just because "it's 10 minutes long"
930:
http://gagadaily.com/2010/01/telephone-music-video-filming-today/
3987:
http://www.ariacharts.com.au/pages/charts_display.asp?chart=1U50
2004:
It's not a physical release, but it is available for sale, yes?
1973:
How is this going in circles? What's the complicating factor?
1743:
Have re-ordered the lead to make it logiaclly ordered and meet
746:
4504:
611:
moved an unsigned comment per "Put new text under old text." —
25:
5690:
Has enough solo merit and attention for a separate article.--
1204:
The source provided is radio1.gr (considered unreliable) NOT
4355:
2222:
that the #3 option is invalid actually. I have seen OCC and
184:
Telephone has charted on several national music charts. See
3856:
When I edited the following sentence under "Composition":
2622:. I say we leave things for now and monitor the situation.
1233:
Lady Gaga's UK site have confirmed the release for March.
118:
6423:
2883:
as the remix EP cover without the Telephone Remixes name.
2483:
1005:
and then almost had Britney singing on it for this version
5254:: see no reason why this shouldn't have it's own page. --
95:
in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of
5355:
I've re-add (see below) the disagree comments that were
3900:
Thank goodness I found a MORE RELIABLE source than that
5356:
4421:
3241:
A more reliable source for radio add dates is FMQB.com
2761:
1872:
1151:
884:, so although we know it is her, we can not verify it.
5099:
You are assumming, guessing or watching the future???
4164:. Knowledge doesnot endorse such selling of products.
3794:
I changed this after lots of edit conflicts. Regards,
3584:
That's only if the song reaches number-one, else not.
2486:
site. Is that the offical german site? I have doubts.
6326:
Well, I actually do think it is going to be tributed.
6097:
current google news search on "telephone"+"Lady gaga"
5419:: The video is considered a short film and so is the
4594:
Apparently there's no consensus on the consensus? :)
2791:
Okay, noticed that iTunes France says it's a single.
1460:
artist Lady Gaga, taken from her second studio album
5266:
See no reason why this should have it's own page...
4457:, it's perfectly OK for you to insert the material.—
878:
Knowledge:RS#Self-published and questionable sources
4868:It has a lot of trivia or unnecessary information.
231:
http://ariacharts.com.au/pages/images/telephone.jpg
1154:the date is correctly listed as December 2, 2009.
138:Justin Timberlake - Billboard Artist Chart History
1373:the introductory paragraphs of an article should
1285:http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/music/singlesreviews/
2226:denoting the release as the chartng issue date.
4590:"the video was positively received by critics."
208:This song has been confirmed as a single (here
188:about Notability of Albums, singles and songs.
4057:What about the strong Product Placement theme?
3708:notable trivia and are clear-cut intentional.
1957:So ultimately we are going around in circles.
856:If you archive the individual Twitter post at
669:on Australian radio stations, they said that.
134:Until the End of Time (Justin Timberlake song)
4455:WP:BAN#Edits by and on behalf of banned users
4138:I'm sure there's more in addition to these. –
909:people just wait till the video is released?
8:
5635:not every person in this world is a gaga fan
2879:The main single cover has been confirmed by
2501:lady-gaga.de is the official german site --♫
2306:Wesley, Charting issue date is #3 and above
89:Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting
3262:. Anyone is welcome to create the article.—
2359:the latter situation may have occured with
2091:so number 1 would NOT be appropriate here.—
6435:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQ95z6ywcBY
5308:if I was to restore them myself. Regards,
5215:. We cannot speculate about these things.
2585:when the song is released for CD release.
1390:for examples of acceptable lead sections.
503:project talk and reach a consensus there.
3646:Its all unsourced and has been reverted.
4507:digital store has not been used. Why do
3494:) 18:50, 6 March 2010 (UTC) AriandaGAGA
2482:(unreliable? - see release date) or the
1135:http://www.fox.com.au/shows/hot30/vote--
6416:
6370:Telephone (music video) fully protected
4184:Queerty, Fox News and negative comments
3904:Billboard. Here you go, it's from BBC:
2614:That is what happened with songs like
708:no confirmation of what that will be.
327:of now it is only Lady Gaga's single.
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
3851:
7:
3553:Did you even read my comment above?
2776:do we have to say this is a single.
1133:its also being played here in aus :
664:This single has not been confirmed..
540:on the WikiProject Songs talk page.
536:Any further comments should be made
2701:of now that is the official cover.
114:Sweet Dreams (Beyoncé Knowles song)
4541:amoung the alternatives. Regards,
4404:WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Brexx
2772:(edit:noticed that it does). What
495:This discussion will be a case of
211:) and the page should be changed.
24:
6424:http://en.wikipedia.org/Lady_Gaga
3718:Where is the source for that?....
1208:. Therefore it has been removed.
771:hence that info cannot be added.
6060:Michael Jackson's Thriller video
5645:) 17:16, 16 March 2010 (UTC+1)
4371:
3785:
1456:is a song performed by American
1345:instead of making such remarks.
1007:but then it all went wrong...."
454:It already is on her discography
107:Reference named "billboard.com":
29:
4077:No. Its undue weightage given.
2478:to be incorrect. It comes from
1503:Knowledge:WikiProject Lady Gaga
3444:is older, it was written when
3213:Perhaps a wiki article titled
3185:an actual airplay debut date.
1341:Piano should be redirected to
406:Give It to Me (Timbaland song)
391:Déjà Vu (Beyoncé Knowles song)
365:) 23:07 14 December 2009 (UTC)
310:" as she is not billed there.
1:
3625:Clean up Music Video synopsis
3482:Billboard pop song chart ....
3412:Circus_(Britney_Spears_album)
3308:05:56, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
3251:04:46, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
3235:23:42, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
3209:23:16, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
3195:12:27, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
3176:05:47, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
3160:05:33, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
3146:05:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
3131:05:12, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
3115:04:59, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
3086:03:04, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
3063:17:28, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
3047:16:32, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
3029:16:28, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
3004:15:41, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
2985:14:16, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
2944:01:14, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
2930:10:34, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
2914:08:59, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
2895:04:36, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
2874:18:11, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
2851:05:25, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
2834:05:14, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
2817:03:09, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
2801:13:06, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
2786:12:54, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
2750:07:52, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
2734:16:32, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
2462:05:28, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
2447:04:50, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
2431:03:46, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
2396:02:31, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
2373:13:47, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
2320:13:23, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
2302:12:32, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
2286:13:23, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
2238:12:25, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
2193:12:21, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
2157:06:54, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
2117:03:29, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
2101:02:40, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
2079:15:15, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
2048:12:51, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
2034:12:43, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
2014:12:51, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
2000:12:16, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
1983:08:15, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
1969:03:39, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
1952:12:23, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
1933:01:57, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
1919:01:43, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
1901:01:25, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
1886:22:23, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
1863:15:27, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
1847:03:42, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
1830:03:41, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
1816:18:58, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
1797:23:33, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
1757:15:40, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
1739:15:30, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
1722:05:13, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
1705:02:57, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
1675:02:10, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
1647:01:21, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
1620:00:39, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
1598:00:37, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
1579:00:45, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
1564:00:35, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
1526:00:19, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
1434:00:09, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
1228:17:22, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
1174:00:18, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
1146:23:31, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
586:03:32, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
569:03:26, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
550:15:33, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
515:05:18, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
491:02:03, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
476:01:37, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
449:01:26, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
434:01:11, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
381:15:01, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
337:04:04, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
322:03:59, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
293:03:24, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
273:23:40, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
5707:See the edited version now.
5060:09:51, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
4329:in France on April 6, 2010.
3076:(apaboutsims) (cant login)--
2711:19:09, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
2696:06:14, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
2676:23:58, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
2661:23:54, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
2632:23:51, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
2610:23:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
2595:23:34, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
2580:23:17, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
2566:17:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
2542:06:17, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
2527:07:15, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
2511:09:33, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
2496:02:13, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
2476:File:Telephone_Lady_Gaga.png
2474:I believe the current image
1569:and has a lot to summarize.
1415:20:55, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
1400:00:55, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
1357:03:34, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
1337:11:50, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
1321:11:40, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
1296:03:39, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
1254:13:27, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
1188:03:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
1129:20:59, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
1107:04:05, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
1081:20:40, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
1053:04:01, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
1037:14:42, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
1019:09:55, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
990:02:06, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
958:20:27, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
942:13:23, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
921:04:50, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
900:04:40, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
871:03:55, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
845:02:53, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
805:01:17, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
783:03:27, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
759:17:17, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
740:00:23, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
718:01:14, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
658:21:43, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
637:14:43, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
249:11:10, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
221:11:46, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
198:19:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
178:19:16, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
153:15:50, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
4422:now confirmed via Checkuser
3340:No confirmation of either.
3095:There's a big problem with
2760:Given the suggestion that "
2087:. But this article page is
1542:and i think articles like "
747:http://twitter.com/BoomKack
703:11:32, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
685:11:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
621:23:20, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
6453:
6411:03:25, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
6394:03:48, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
6360:06:31, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
6341:19:16, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
6320:06:37, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
6304:06:23, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
6294:I could not agree more...
6290:23:49, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
6273:23:37, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
6254:16:50, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
6239:06:22, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
6204:07:11, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
6187:I agree with Ryulong that
6183:06:51, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
6158:06:38, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
6132:06:06, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
6113:05:56, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
6091:04:44, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
6072:01:26, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
6043:04:44, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
6013:23:01, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
5991:18:17, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
5970:04:44, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
5956:01:00, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
5942:16:02, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
5925:09:38, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
5906:03:31, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
5889:20:49, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
5868:20:30, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
5851:14:52, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
5829:06:51, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
5814:11:59, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
5789:05:36, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
5772:05:32, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
5745:05:16, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
5719:05:28, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
5700:05:04, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
5680:04:44, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
5621:06:51, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
5606:05:28, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
5585:04:44, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
5556:04:50, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
5537:04:44, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
5523:04:50, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
5508:02:25, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
5484:18:41, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
5463:06:51, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
5444:00:18, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
5412:21:57, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
5395:21:20, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
5366:04:36, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
5351:03:17, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
5337:02:05, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
5318:01:46, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
5294:01:31, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
5276:06:51, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
5259:00:10, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
5244:04:44, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
5225:14:29, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
5207:14:22, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
5190:01:28, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
5172:23:56, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
5148:06:51, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
5131:23:03, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
5109:06:51, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
5095:05:28, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
5045:06:51, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
5030:05:28, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
5011:17:28, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
4987:06:51, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
4973:05:28, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
4954:22:05, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
4934:05:28, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
4915:18:55, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
4898:18:46, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
4878:04:44, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
4864:18:32, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
4845:06:51, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
4828:16:05, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
4810:23:15, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
4790:14:36, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
4763:14:21, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
4741:12:27, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
4721:13:00, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
4702:07:09, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
4671:23:27, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
4655:22:36, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
4632:18:42, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
4607:18:48, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
4574:The video: loved or hated?
4564:03:01, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
4546:01:29, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
4525:08:32, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
4494:07:53, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
4467:20:17, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
4448:19:42, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
4434:20:44, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
4416:23:18, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
4397:04:05, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
4310:19:38, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
4296:07:24, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
4277:17:31, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
4251:08:53, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
4225:07:29, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
4176:04:56, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
4156:22:02, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
4108:16:42, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
4089:03:52, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
4072:16:49, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
4050:13:14, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
4025:21:36, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
4009:08:55, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
3972:03:28, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
3941:16:03, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
3921:00:20, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
3896:13:31, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
3875:13:21, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
3852:It's harp, not harpsichord
3846:03:54, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
3829:21:53, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
3804:12:52, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
3778:08:18, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
3748:01:47, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
3728:16:30, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
3698:15:18, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
3672:12:06, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
3658:04:40, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
3641:23:26, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
3619:15:20, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
3596:08:25, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
3579:06:38, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
3565:03:40, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
3548:20:09, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
3091:Flaw with airplay citation
3013:is not a reliable source,
1041:This one is a bad source.
158:This is an unreleased song
6103:notable than the song. --
4188:I added a reference to a
3534:03:56, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
3515:18:45, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
3436:14:06, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
3402:12:58, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
3366:04:08, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
3350:00:30, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
3333:19:19, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
3272:19:19, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
2720:hmv.com has a new cover:
1472:, Lazonate Franklin, and
1464:(2009). Written by Gaga,
1279:) 08:12, 25 January 2010
964:Additional Guest Vocalist
3258:should also redirect to
1779:Release date (Revisited)
1491:4 Minutes (Madonna song)
388:4 Minutes (Madonna song)
87:I check pages listed in
6376:Telephone (music video)
4677:Alphabeat cover of song
4351:) 03:43, 20 March 2010
3703:References in the Video
2484:http://www.lady-gaga.de
2089:Template:Infobox single
394:Bartender (T-Pain song)
80:Orphaned references in
5158:: Strongly agree with
4360:
4192:story that links to a
3448:was just a dream, and
3442:Beautiful, Dirty, Rich
2363:but not exactly sure.
6374:I've fully protected
6136:Everything about the
5357:removed by an IP user
4359:
4323:{{editsemiprotected}}
2960:{{editsemiprotected}}
2085:Template:Infobox song
42:of past discussions.
18:Talk:Telephone (song)
3880:The source cited is
3732:In the video, duh.
3021:Leonaistheoneforever
2977:Leonaistheoneforever
1905:That is my point at
1548:I Look to You (song)
412:Me Against the Music
409:Jump (Flo Rida song)
6378:due the persistent
4890:Vitorvicentevalente
4318:Edit Semi-protected
4300:yeah i'm at a loss
4262:painted on clothes?
3720:Charleysgrilledsubs
3414:was released after
2380:Champagne Supernova
1552:Fight For This Love
1544:Million Dollar Bill
1384:Fight for This Love
262:12345abcxyz20082009
93:orphaned references
4747:Disagree. Agreed
4361:
4196:interview between
3321:Trivia harrypotter
3312:Monday, 8 march!
3294:Video Release Date
2839:Thank you Wesley.
2384:Stairway to Heaven
1388:Angels Cry (Remix)
278:Beyonce chronology
5651:comment added by
5588:
5571:comment added by
5498:comment added by
5447:
5430:comment added by
5066:comment added by
5059:
5009:
4780:comment added by
4753:comment added by
4645:comment added by
4635:
4618:comment added by
4395:
4353:
4339:comment added by
4294:
4241:comment added by
4223:
4096:Product Placement
4053:
4036:comment added by
4012:
3995:comment added by
3962:comment added by
3951:Thelma and Louise
3768:comment added by
3738:comment added by
3639:
3518:
3501:comment added by
3473:
3459:comment added by
3424:original research
3410:Most likely not.
3392:comment added by
3336:
3319:comment added by
2872:
2564:
2525:
1806:please! Regards,
1306:Offered to Spears
1281:
1267:comment added by
1257:
1240:comment added by
1172:
1097:comment added by
1071:comment added by
993:
976:comment added by
821:The problem with
769:unreliable source
648:comment added by
627:See topic below.
623:
607:Please remove it!
474:
432:
367:
353:comment added by
168:comment added by
77:
76:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
6444:
6437:
6432:
6426:
6421:
6406:
6389:
6315:
6269:
6263:
6235:
6229:
6199:
6179:
6173:
6127:
6010:
6004:
5951:Crystal Clear x3
5901:
5886:
5883:
5809:Crystal Clear x3
5784:
5769:
5764:
5754:every single one
5740:
5714:
5660:
5601:
5587:
5565:
5551:Crystal Clear x3
5518:Crystal Clear x3
5510:
5446:
5424:
5361:Crystal Clear x3
5121:: per Candyo32.
5090:
5075:
5058:
5025:
5003:
4968:
4929:
4792:
4765:
4744:
4657:
4634:
4612:
4560:
4554:
4521:
4515:
4394:
4392:
4386:
4380:
4379:
4375:
4374:
4352:
4333:
4288:
4253:
4217:
4210:
4204:
4171:
4152:
4144:
4084:
4052:
4030:
4011:
3989:
3974:
3902:extreme reliable
3891:
3841:
3793:
3789:
3788:
3780:
3750:
3653:
3633:
3591:
3560:
3529:
3517:
3495:
3472:
3453:
3404:
3384:The Fame Monster
3361:
3335:
3313:
3260:Add date (Radio)
3171:
2962:
2961:
2925:
2890:
2866:
2846:
2812:
2691:
2563:
2561:
2554:
2547:
2519:
2426:
2233:
2154:
2149:
2112:
1995:
1964:
1875:
1842:
1717:
1462:The Fame Monster
1352:
1313:Piano non troppo
1280:
1261:
1256:
1242:Robinsimpson1992
1234:
1226:
1224:
1217:
1171:
1169:
1162:
1155:
1126:
1119:
1109:
1083:
1061:Music Video Plot
1048:
992:
970:
916:
897:
892:
842:
837:
778:
698:
682:
677:
660:
610:
510:
473:
471:
464:
457:
431:
429:
422:
415:
400:Can't Believe It
366:
347:
317:
269:
263:
180:
150:
129:
127:
126:
97:Telephone (song)
82:Telephone (song)
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
6452:
6451:
6447:
6446:
6445:
6443:
6442:
6441:
6440:
6433:
6429:
6422:
6418:
6401:
6385:
6372:
6352:Fortunato luigi
6333:200.121.135.217
6310:
6296:Fortunato luigi
6267:
6261:
6233:
6227:
6194:
6177:
6171:
6122:
6083:Fortunato luigi
6035:Fortunato luigi
6008:
6002:
5962:Fortunato luigi
5896:
5884:
5881:
5849:
5821:Fortunato luigi
5779:
5767:
5758:
5735:
5727:Strong disagree
5709:
5672:Fortunato luigi
5646:
5613:Fortunato luigi
5596:
5566:
5547:Strong disagree
5529:Fortunato luigi
5493:
5455:Fortunato luigi
5425:
5343:The Mach Turtle
5268:Fortunato luigi
5236:Fortunato luigi
5223:
5182:The Mach Turtle
5140:Fortunato luigi
5101:Fortunato luigi
5085:
5061:
5037:Fortunato luigi
5020:
4979:Fortunato luigi
4963:
4946:The Mach Turtle
4924:
4870:Fortunato luigi
4837:Fortunato luigi
4775:
4771:
4748:
4734:
4709:
4679:
4640:
4613:
4578:First we have:
4576:
4558:
4552:
4519:
4513:
4481:
4390:
4384:
4381:
4372:
4370:
4334:
4320:
4264:
4236:
4208:
4202:
4186:
4166:
4150:
4142:
4117:Advertising Age
4079:
4059:
4031:
3990:
3980:
3957:
3953:
3886:
3854:
3836:
3827:
3812:
3810:Too many quotes
3786:
3784:
3763:
3759:
3733:
3705:
3682:
3648:
3627:
3586:
3555:
3524:
3496:
3484:
3454:
3387:
3376:
3356:
3314:
3296:
3223:Radio add dates
3166:
3093:
3071:
2959:
2958:
2956:
2920:
2885:
2859:
2841:
2807:
2758:
2703:Grk1011/Stephen
2686:
2557:
2550:
2548:
2472:
2421:
2228:
2152:
2143:
2107:
2026:Grk1011/Stephen
1990:
1959:
1871:
1837:
1781:
1712:
1571:Grk1011/Stephen
1474:Beyoncé Knowles
1470:LaShawn Daniels
1407:Grk1011/Stephen
1367:
1347:
1308:
1262:
1235:
1220:
1211:
1209:
1202:
1165:
1158:
1156:
1122:
1115:
1092:
1089:
1066:
1063:
1043:
971:
966:
911:
895:
886:
840:
831:
773:
728:
693:
680:
671:
666:
643:
598:
557:
542:Grk1011/Stephen
505:
483:Grk1011/Stephen
467:
460:
458:
441:Grk1011/Stephen
425:
418:
416:
414:and much more.
373:Grk1011/Stephen
348:
329:Grk1011/Stephen
312:
285:Grk1011/Stephen
280:
267:
261:
256:
254:Featured artist
228:
213:121.221.166.195
206:
163:
160:
148:
124:
122:
121:. Billboard.com
117:
85:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
6450:
6448:
6439:
6438:
6427:
6415:
6414:
6413:
6371:
6368:
6367:
6366:
6365:
6364:
6363:
6362:
6330:
6329:
6328:
6327:
6324:
6323:
6322:
6276:
6275:
6246:200.121.150.55
6219:
6218:
6217:
6216:
6215:
6214:
6213:
6212:
6211:
6210:
6209:
6208:
6207:
6206:
6075:
6074:
6048:
6047:
6046:
6045:
6027:
6026:
6016:
6015:
5994:
5993:
5975:
5974:
5973:
5972:
5958:
5909:
5908:
5875:
5873:
5872:
5871:
5870:
5845:
5836:
5835:
5834:
5833:
5832:
5831:
5792:
5791:
5724:
5723:
5722:
5721:
5685:
5684:
5683:
5682:
5633:I'm sure that
5628:
5627:
5626:
5625:
5624:
5623:
5544:
5543:
5542:
5541:
5540:
5539:
5468:
5467:
5466:
5465:
5379:
5378:
5377:
5376:
5375:
5374:
5373:
5372:
5371:
5370:
5369:
5368:
5297:
5296:
5281:
5280:
5279:
5278:
5249:
5248:
5247:
5246:
5227:
5219:
5199:68.161.161.145
5192:
5153:
5152:
5151:
5150:
5116:
5115:
5114:
5113:
5112:
5111:
5052:
5051:
5050:
5049:
5048:
5047:
4994:
4993:
4992:
4991:
4990:
4989:
4939:
4938:
4937:
4936:
4883:
4882:
4881:
4880:
4856:68.161.161.145
4850:
4849:
4848:
4847:
4813:
4812:
4794:
4793:
4782:213.107.130.50
4770:
4767:
4739:comment added
4708:
4707:Video article?
4705:
4678:
4675:
4674:
4673:
4592:
4591:
4584:
4583:
4575:
4572:
4571:
4570:
4569:
4568:
4567:
4566:
4503:store and the
4480:
4477:
4476:
4475:
4474:
4473:
4472:
4471:
4470:
4469:
4319:
4316:
4315:
4314:
4313:
4312:
4263:
4260:
4259:
4258:
4257:
4256:
4255:
4254:
4185:
4182:
4181:
4180:
4179:
4178:
4136:
4135:
4134:
4129:
4124:
4119:
4092:
4091:
4058:
4055:
3979:
3978:Certifications
3976:
3952:
3949:
3948:
3947:
3946:
3945:
3944:
3943:
3853:
3850:
3849:
3848:
3823:
3811:
3808:
3807:
3806:
3770:124.180.87.232
3758:
3755:
3754:
3753:
3752:
3751:
3740:118.209.182.21
3714:
3711:
3704:
3701:
3681:
3678:
3677:
3676:
3675:
3674:
3664:117.24.194.186
3626:
3623:
3607:
3606:
3605:
3604:
3603:
3602:
3601:
3600:
3599:
3598:
3483:
3480:
3479:
3478:
3477:
3476:
3475:
3474:
3375:
3372:
3371:
3370:
3369:
3368:
3300:64.188.237.142
3295:
3292:
3291:
3290:
3289:
3288:
3287:
3286:
3285:
3284:
3283:
3282:
3281:
3280:
3279:
3278:
3277:
3276:
3275:
3274:
3215:Going for adds
3211:
3092:
3089:
3070:
3067:
3066:
3065:
3050:
3049:
3033:
3007:
3006:
2955:
2952:
2951:
2950:
2949:
2948:
2947:
2946:
2932:
2858:
2857:Remix EP cover
2855:
2854:
2853:
2822:
2821:
2820:
2819:
2757:
2754:
2753:
2752:
2718:
2717:
2716:
2715:
2714:
2713:
2649:
2648:
2647:
2646:
2645:
2644:
2643:
2642:
2641:
2640:
2639:
2638:
2637:
2636:
2635:
2634:
2620:Love Sex Magic
2471:
2468:
2467:
2466:
2465:
2464:
2417:
2416:
2415:
2414:
2413:
2412:
2411:
2410:
2409:
2408:
2407:
2406:
2405:
2404:
2403:
2402:
2401:
2400:
2399:
2398:
2339:
2338:
2337:
2336:
2335:
2334:
2333:
2332:
2331:
2330:
2329:
2328:
2327:
2326:
2325:
2324:
2323:
2322:
2290:
2289:
2288:
2253:
2252:
2251:
2250:
2249:
2248:
2247:
2246:
2245:
2244:
2243:
2242:
2241:
2240:
2206:
2205:
2204:
2203:
2202:
2201:
2200:
2199:
2198:
2197:
2196:
2195:
2170:
2169:
2168:
2167:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2163:
2162:
2161:
2160:
2159:
2128:
2127:
2126:
2125:
2124:
2123:
2122:
2121:
2120:
2119:
2067:
2066:
2065:
2062:
2059:
2056:
2055:Release to buy
2022:
2021:
2020:
2019:
2018:
2017:
2016:
1940:
1939:
1938:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1780:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1760:
1759:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1653:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1585:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1483:
1466:Rodney Jerkins
1450:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1418:
1417:
1366:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1307:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1260:Source please
1201:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1088:
1085:
1073:122.109.36.138
1062:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
997:Here you go:
996:
965:
962:
961:
960:
928:
926:
925:
924:
923:
903:
902:
854:
853:
852:
851:
850:
849:
848:
847:
812:
811:
810:
809:
808:
807:
788:
787:
786:
785:
767:Twitter is an
762:
761:
751:TheRevolution7
727:
724:
723:
722:
721:
720:
665:
662:
640:
639:
609:
597:
592:
591:
590:
589:
588:
556:
553:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
344:Live Your Life
304:Marilyn Manson
279:
276:
255:
252:
227:
224:
205:
202:
201:
200:
159:
156:
141:
140:
130:
84:
78:
75:
74:
69:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
6449:
6436:
6431:
6428:
6425:
6420:
6417:
6412:
6409:
6407:
6405:
6398:
6397:
6396:
6395:
6392:
6390:
6388:
6381:
6377:
6369:
6361:
6357:
6353:
6349:
6348:
6347:
6346:
6345:
6344:
6343:
6342:
6338:
6334:
6325:
6321:
6318:
6316:
6314:
6307:
6306:
6305:
6301:
6297:
6293:
6292:
6291:
6287:
6283:
6278:
6277:
6274:
6270:
6264:
6258:
6257:
6256:
6255:
6251:
6247:
6241:
6240:
6236:
6230:
6224:
6205:
6202:
6200:
6198:
6190:
6186:
6185:
6184:
6180:
6174:
6168:
6164:
6161:
6160:
6159:
6155:
6151:
6147:
6143:
6139:
6135:
6134:
6133:
6130:
6128:
6126:
6119:
6116:
6115:
6114:
6110:
6106:
6102:
6098:
6094:
6093:
6092:
6088:
6084:
6081:unnecessary.
6079:
6078:
6077:
6076:
6073:
6069:
6065:
6061:
6057:
6053:
6050:
6049:
6044:
6040:
6036:
6031:
6030:
6029:
6028:
6025:
6021:
6018:
6017:
6014:
6011:
6005:
5999:
5996:
5995:
5992:
5988:
5984:
5980:
5977:
5976:
5971:
5967:
5963:
5959:
5957:
5954:
5952:
5948:
5947:
5946:
5945:
5944:
5943:
5939:
5935:
5931:
5927:
5926:
5922:
5918:
5913:
5907:
5904:
5902:
5900:
5893:
5892:
5891:
5890:
5887:
5878:
5869:
5865:
5861:
5857:
5856:
5855:
5854:
5853:
5852:
5848:
5844:
5840:
5839:Strong oppose
5830:
5826:
5822:
5817:
5816:
5815:
5812:
5810:
5806:
5802:
5801:
5800:
5799:
5798:
5796:
5790:
5787:
5785:
5783:
5776:
5775:
5774:
5773:
5770:
5765:
5762:
5755:
5751:
5747:
5746:
5743:
5741:
5739:
5732:
5728:
5720:
5717:
5715:
5713:
5706:
5705:
5704:
5703:
5702:
5701:
5697:
5693:
5689:
5681:
5677:
5673:
5669:
5668:WP:OTHERSTUFF
5665:
5664:
5663:
5662:
5661:
5658:
5654:
5650:
5644:
5640:
5636:
5632:
5622:
5618:
5614:
5609:
5608:
5607:
5604:
5602:
5600:
5593:
5592:
5591:
5590:
5589:
5586:
5582:
5578:
5574:
5570:
5562:
5558:
5557:
5554:
5552:
5548:
5538:
5534:
5530:
5526:
5525:
5524:
5521:
5519:
5515:
5514:
5513:
5512:
5511:
5509:
5505:
5501:
5497:
5490:
5486:
5485:
5481:
5477:
5473:
5464:
5460:
5456:
5452:
5451:
5450:
5449:
5448:
5445:
5441:
5437:
5433:
5429:
5422:
5418:
5414:
5413:
5409:
5405:
5401:
5397:
5396:
5392:
5388:
5387:130.76.32.144
5383:
5367:
5364:
5362:
5358:
5354:
5353:
5352:
5348:
5344:
5340:
5339:
5338:
5334:
5330:
5325:
5321:
5320:
5319:
5315:
5311:
5307:
5303:
5302:
5301:
5300:
5299:
5298:
5295:
5291:
5287:
5283:
5282:
5277:
5273:
5269:
5265:
5264:
5263:
5262:
5261:
5260:
5257:
5253:
5245:
5241:
5237:
5233:
5228:
5226:
5222:
5218:
5214:
5210:
5209:
5208:
5204:
5200:
5196:
5193:
5191:
5187:
5183:
5179:
5176:
5175:
5174:
5173:
5169:
5165:
5161:
5157:
5149:
5145:
5141:
5137:
5136:
5135:
5134:
5133:
5132:
5128:
5124:
5123:EnDaLeCoMpLeX
5120:
5110:
5106:
5102:
5098:
5097:
5096:
5093:
5091:
5089:
5083:
5080:
5079:
5078:
5077:
5076:
5073:
5069:
5068:122.148.210.2
5065:
5056:
5046:
5042:
5038:
5033:
5032:
5031:
5028:
5026:
5024:
5017:
5016:
5015:
5014:
5013:
5012:
5007:
5002:
4998:
4988:
4984:
4980:
4976:
4975:
4974:
4971:
4969:
4967:
4960:
4959:
4958:
4957:
4956:
4955:
4951:
4947:
4943:
4935:
4932:
4930:
4928:
4921:
4920:
4919:
4918:
4917:
4916:
4912:
4908:
4904:
4900:
4899:
4895:
4891:
4887:
4879:
4875:
4871:
4867:
4866:
4865:
4861:
4857:
4852:
4851:
4846:
4842:
4838:
4834:
4833:
4832:
4831:
4830:
4829:
4825:
4821:
4817:
4811:
4807:
4803:
4799:
4798:Guardian link
4796:
4795:
4791:
4787:
4783:
4779:
4773:
4772:
4768:
4766:
4764:
4760:
4756:
4755:121.54.92.137
4752:
4745:
4742:
4738:
4732:
4728:
4723:
4722:
4718:
4714:
4706:
4704:
4703:
4699:
4695:
4691:
4687:
4683:
4676:
4672:
4668:
4664:
4663:208.38.59.163
4660:
4659:
4658:
4656:
4652:
4648:
4647:67.81.115.114
4644:
4636:
4633:
4629:
4625:
4621:
4617:
4609:
4608:
4604:
4600:
4595:
4589:
4588:
4587:
4581:
4580:
4579:
4573:
4565:
4561:
4555:
4549:
4548:
4547:
4544:
4540:
4536:
4532:
4528:
4527:
4526:
4522:
4516:
4510:
4506:
4502:
4498:
4497:
4496:
4495:
4491:
4487:
4478:
4468:
4464:
4460:
4456:
4451:
4450:
4449:
4445:
4441:
4437:
4436:
4435:
4431:
4427:
4423:
4420:Relationship
4419:
4418:
4417:
4413:
4409:
4405:
4401:
4400:
4399:
4398:
4393:
4388:
4387:
4378:
4368:
4366:
4358:
4354:
4350:
4346:
4342:
4338:
4332:
4328:
4324:
4317:
4311:
4307:
4303:
4299:
4298:
4297:
4292:
4287:
4286:
4281:
4280:
4279:
4278:
4274:
4270:
4261:
4252:
4248:
4244:
4243:72.91.144.123
4240:
4233:
4232:
4231:
4230:
4229:
4228:
4227:
4226:
4221:
4216:
4215:
4207:
4199:
4195:
4191:
4183:
4177:
4174:
4172:
4170:
4163:
4159:
4158:
4157:
4153:
4147:
4146:
4145:
4137:
4133:
4132:Rolling Stone
4130:
4128:
4125:
4123:
4120:
4118:
4115:
4114:
4112:
4111:
4110:
4109:
4105:
4101:
4097:
4090:
4087:
4085:
4083:
4076:
4075:
4074:
4073:
4069:
4065:
4056:
4054:
4051:
4047:
4043:
4039:
4035:
4027:
4026:
4022:
4018:
4013:
4010:
4006:
4002:
3998:
3994:
3988:
3983:
3977:
3975:
3973:
3969:
3965:
3961:
3950:
3942:
3938:
3934:
3930:
3929:
3924:
3923:
3922:
3918:
3914:
3911:
3908:which states
3907:
3903:
3899:
3898:
3897:
3894:
3892:
3890:
3883:
3879:
3878:
3877:
3876:
3872:
3868:
3862:
3861:
3857:
3847:
3844:
3842:
3840:
3833:
3832:
3831:
3830:
3826:
3822:
3818:
3809:
3805:
3801:
3797:
3792:
3783:
3782:
3781:
3779:
3775:
3771:
3767:
3756:
3749:
3745:
3741:
3737:
3731:
3730:
3729:
3725:
3721:
3717:
3716:
3715:
3712:
3709:
3702:
3700:
3699:
3695:
3691:
3690:190.29.145.39
3687:
3686:Rolling Stone
3679:
3673:
3669:
3665:
3661:
3660:
3659:
3656:
3654:
3652:
3645:
3644:
3643:
3642:
3637:
3632:
3624:
3622:
3620:
3616:
3612:
3597:
3594:
3592:
3590:
3583:
3582:
3580:
3576:
3572:
3568:
3567:
3566:
3563:
3561:
3559:
3552:
3551:
3549:
3545:
3541:
3537:
3536:
3535:
3532:
3530:
3528:
3521:
3520:
3519:
3516:
3512:
3508:
3504:
3500:
3493:
3489:
3481:
3470:
3466:
3462:
3458:
3451:
3447:
3443:
3440:I think that
3439:
3438:
3437:
3433:
3429:
3425:
3421:
3417:
3413:
3409:
3408:
3407:
3406:
3405:
3403:
3399:
3395:
3394:222.79.158.77
3391:
3385:
3381:
3373:
3367:
3364:
3362:
3360:
3353:
3352:
3351:
3347:
3343:
3339:
3338:
3337:
3334:
3330:
3326:
3322:
3318:
3310:
3309:
3305:
3301:
3293:
3273:
3269:
3265:
3261:
3257:
3256:Impacts radio
3254:
3253:
3252:
3248:
3244:
3240:
3239:
3238:
3237:
3236:
3232:
3228:
3224:
3220:
3216:
3212:
3210:
3206:
3202:
3198:
3197:
3196:
3192:
3188:
3184:
3179:
3178:
3177:
3174:
3172:
3170:
3163:
3162:
3161:
3157:
3153:
3149:
3148:
3147:
3143:
3139:
3134:
3133:
3132:
3128:
3124:
3119:
3118:
3117:
3116:
3112:
3108:
3103:
3098:
3090:
3088:
3087:
3083:
3079:
3078:61.68.180.221
3075:
3068:
3064:
3060:
3056:
3052:
3051:
3048:
3044:
3040:
3036:
3035:
3034:
3031:
3030:
3026:
3022:
3018:
3016:
3012:
3005:
3001:
2997:
2993:
2989:
2988:
2987:
2986:
2982:
2978:
2974:
2973:
2969:
2966:
2963:
2953:
2945:
2941:
2937:
2936:61.68.151.253
2933:
2931:
2928:
2926:
2924:
2917:
2916:
2915:
2911:
2907:
2906:61.68.138.189
2903:
2898:
2897:
2896:
2893:
2891:
2889:
2882:
2878:
2877:
2876:
2875:
2870:
2865:
2856:
2852:
2849:
2847:
2845:
2838:
2837:
2836:
2835:
2831:
2827:
2818:
2815:
2813:
2811:
2804:
2803:
2802:
2798:
2794:
2790:
2789:
2788:
2787:
2783:
2779:
2775:
2771:
2767:
2763:
2755:
2751:
2747:
2743:
2738:
2737:
2736:
2735:
2732:
2729:
2728:
2723:
2712:
2708:
2704:
2699:
2698:
2697:
2694:
2692:
2690:
2683:
2679:
2678:
2677:
2673:
2669:
2665:
2664:
2663:
2662:
2658:
2654:
2633:
2629:
2625:
2621:
2617:
2613:
2612:
2611:
2607:
2603:
2598:
2597:
2596:
2592:
2588:
2583:
2582:
2581:
2577:
2573:
2569:
2568:
2567:
2562:
2560:
2555:
2553:
2545:
2544:
2543:
2539:
2535:
2530:
2529:
2528:
2523:
2518:
2514:
2513:
2512:
2509:
2506:
2505:
2500:
2499:
2498:
2497:
2493:
2489:
2485:
2481:
2477:
2469:
2463:
2459:
2455:
2450:
2449:
2448:
2444:
2440:
2435:
2434:
2433:
2432:
2429:
2427:
2425:
2397:
2393:
2389:
2385:
2381:
2376:
2375:
2374:
2370:
2366:
2362:
2357:
2356:
2355:
2354:
2353:
2352:
2351:
2350:
2349:
2348:
2347:
2346:
2345:
2344:
2343:
2342:
2341:
2340:
2321:
2317:
2313:
2309:
2305:
2304:
2303:
2299:
2295:
2291:
2287:
2283:
2279:
2275:
2274:source please
2271:
2270:
2269:
2268:
2267:
2266:
2265:
2264:
2263:
2262:
2261:
2260:
2259:
2258:
2257:
2256:
2255:
2254:
2239:
2236:
2234:
2232:
2225:
2220:
2219:
2218:
2217:
2216:
2215:
2214:
2213:
2212:
2211:
2210:
2209:
2208:
2207:
2194:
2190:
2186:
2182:
2181:
2180:
2179:
2178:
2177:
2176:
2175:
2174:
2173:
2172:
2171:
2158:
2155:
2150:
2147:
2140:
2139:
2138:
2137:
2136:
2135:
2134:
2133:
2132:
2131:
2130:
2129:
2118:
2115:
2113:
2111:
2104:
2103:
2102:
2098:
2094:
2090:
2086:
2082:
2081:
2080:
2076:
2072:
2068:
2063:
2060:
2057:
2054:
2053:
2051:
2050:
2049:
2045:
2041:
2037:
2036:
2035:
2031:
2027:
2023:
2015:
2011:
2007:
2003:
2002:
2001:
1998:
1996:
1994:
1988:consistency.
1986:
1985:
1984:
1980:
1976:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1967:
1965:
1963:
1956:
1955:
1954:
1953:
1949:
1945:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1922:
1921:
1920:
1916:
1912:
1908:
1904:
1903:
1902:
1898:
1894:
1890:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1883:
1879:
1874:
1864:
1860:
1856:
1852:
1848:
1845:
1843:
1841:
1833:
1832:
1831:
1827:
1823:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1813:
1809:
1805:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1794:
1790:
1786:
1778:
1758:
1754:
1750:
1746:
1745:WP:Paragraphs
1742:
1741:
1740:
1736:
1732:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1720:
1718:
1716:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1702:
1698:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1676:
1672:
1668:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1657:
1648:
1644:
1640:
1635:
1634:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1621:
1617:
1613:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1599:
1595:
1591:
1586:
1580:
1576:
1572:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1541:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1511:
1507:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1495:Irreplaceable
1492:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1481:
1477:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1454:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1419:
1416:
1412:
1408:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1381:
1380:I Look to You
1376:
1372:
1369:According to
1364:
1358:
1355:
1353:
1351:
1344:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1334:
1330:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1318:
1314:
1305:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1286:
1283:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1259:
1258:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1225:
1223:
1218:
1216:
1215:
1207:
1199:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1170:
1168:
1163:
1161:
1153:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1138:61.68.173.132
1136:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1127:
1125:
1120:
1118:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1086:
1084:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1060:
1054:
1051:
1049:
1047:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1027:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1006:
1001:
1000:
994:
991:
987:
983:
979:
975:
963:
959:
955:
951:
947:
946:
945:
943:
939:
935:
931:
922:
919:
917:
915:
907:
906:
905:
904:
901:
898:
893:
890:
883:
879:
875:
874:
873:
872:
868:
864:
859:
846:
843:
838:
835:
828:
824:
820:
819:
818:
817:
816:
815:
814:
813:
806:
802:
798:
794:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
784:
781:
779:
777:
770:
766:
765:
764:
763:
760:
756:
752:
748:
744:
743:
742:
741:
737:
733:
725:
719:
715:
711:
706:
705:
704:
701:
699:
697:
689:
688:
687:
686:
683:
678:
675:
663:
661:
659:
655:
651:
650:87.119.163.21
647:
638:
634:
630:
626:
625:
624:
622:
618:
614:
608:
604:
603:
596:
593:
587:
583:
579:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
570:
566:
562:
554:
552:
551:
547:
543:
539:
516:
513:
511:
509:
502:
498:
494:
493:
492:
488:
484:
479:
478:
477:
472:
470:
465:
463:
455:
452:
451:
450:
446:
442:
437:
436:
435:
430:
428:
423:
421:
413:
410:
407:
404:
403:I'm on a Boat
401:
398:
395:
392:
389:
384:
383:
382:
378:
374:
369:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
345:
340:
339:
338:
334:
330:
325:
324:
323:
320:
318:
316:
309:
305:
301:
297:
296:
295:
294:
290:
286:
277:
275:
274:
270:
264:
253:
251:
250:
246:
242:
238:
233:
232:
225:
223:
222:
218:
214:
210:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
183:
182:
181:
179:
175:
171:
170:86.42.199.115
167:
157:
155:
154:
151:
146:
139:
135:
131:
120:
115:
111:
110:
109:
108:
104:
102:
98:
94:
90:
83:
79:
73:
70:
68:
65:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
6430:
6419:
6403:
6386:
6373:
6331:
6312:
6242:
6223:WP:RECENTISM
6220:
6196:
6166:
6142:WP:RECENTISM
6137:
6124:
6118:WP:RECENTISM
6100:
6055:
6051:
6019:
5997:
5978:
5929:
5928:
5911:
5910:
5898:
5876:
5874:
5838:
5837:
5804:
5794:
5793:
5781:
5760:
5753:
5749:
5748:
5737:
5730:
5726:
5725:
5711:
5692:Marcus Brute
5687:
5686:
5653:92.81.82.124
5634:
5630:
5629:
5598:
5560:
5559:
5546:
5545:
5500:68.191.68.20
5488:
5487:
5471:
5469:
5432:CarsonTaylor
5416:
5415:
5399:
5398:
5381:
5380:
5323:
5251:
5250:
5194:
5177:
5159:
5155:
5154:
5118:
5117:
5087:
5082:Will create?
5081:
5054:
5053:
5022:
4996:
4995:
4965:
4941:
4940:
4926:
4902:
4901:
4885:
4884:
4815:
4814:
4746:
4724:
4710:
4689:
4680:
4637:
4610:
4596:
4593:
4585:
4577:
4508:
4482:
4440:SeanBrockest
4383:
4376:
4369:
4362:
4321:
4302:SeanBrockest
4283:
4269:SeanBrockest
4265:
4212:
4187:
4168:
4140:
4139:
4122:The Guardian
4093:
4081:
4060:
4028:
4014:
3984:
3981:
3964:74.58.12.117
3954:
3927:
3926:
3909:
3901:
3888:
3881:
3863:
3859:
3858:
3855:
3838:
3816:
3813:
3790:
3760:
3713:
3710:
3706:
3683:
3680:Pulp Fiction
3650:
3628:
3621:AriandaGAGA
3608:
3588:
3581:AriandaGAGA
3557:
3550:AriandaGAGA
3526:
3485:
3377:
3358:
3311:
3297:
3222:
3218:
3214:
3182:
3168:
3101:
3094:
3072:
3032:
3019:
3008:
2975:
2970:
2967:
2964:
2957:
2922:
2887:
2860:
2843:
2823:
2809:
2769:
2759:
2726:
2719:
2688:
2650:
2558:
2551:
2503:
2473:
2423:
2418:
2378:example is "
2307:
2230:
2223:
2145:
2109:
1992:
1961:
1941:
1869:
1839:
1782:
1714:
1482:
1478:
1461:
1452:
1451:
1449:
1374:
1368:
1365:Lead Section
1349:
1309:
1221:
1213:
1212:
1203:
1166:
1159:
1123:
1116:
1090:
1087:Release Date
1064:
1045:
1011:86.96.227.90
1009:
1004:
1002:
995:
978:Burbscinates
967:
927:
913:
888:
855:
833:
775:
729:
695:
673:
667:
641:
606:
605:
601:
599:
594:
578:Apeaboutsims
558:
535:
507:
468:
461:
426:
419:
314:
281:
257:
234:
229:
226:Single Cover
207:
161:
142:
123:. Retrieved
106:
105:
100:
86:
60:
43:
37:
6282:Lil-unique1
6024:PatrickFury
5983:Lil-unique1
5803:An article
5647:—Preceding
5567:—Preceding
5494:—Preceding
5426:—Preceding
5062:—Preceding
4800:. Regards,
4776:—Preceding
4749:—Preceding
4735:—Preceding
4727:Dennnni1234
4641:—Preceding
4614:—Preceding
4341:Bottleofjag
4335:—Preceding
4237:—Preceding
4198:Megyn Kelly
4032:—Preceding
3991:—Preceding
3958:—Preceding
3764:—Preceding
3734:—Preceding
3611:AriandaGAGA
3571:AriandaGAGA
3540:AriandaGAGA
3503:AriandaGAGA
3497:—Preceding
3488:AriandaGAGA
3455:—Preceding
3388:—Preceding
3315:—Preceding
3187:WesleyDodds
3138:WesleyDodds
3107:WesleyDodds
2826:WesleyDodds
2770:doesn't say
2624:Lil-unique1
2616:Battlefield
2587:Lil-unique1
2470:Cover image
2439:WesleyDodds
2388:WesleyDodds
2294:WesleyDodds
2185:WesleyDodds
2064:plus others
2040:WesleyDodds
2006:WesleyDodds
1975:WesleyDodds
1944:WesleyDodds
1556:Lil-unique1
1453:"Telephone"
1426:Lil-unique1
1392:Lil-unique1
1269:Legolas2186
1263:—Preceding
1236:—Preceding
1206:BBC Radio 1
1099:99.240.3.85
1093:—Preceding
1067:—Preceding
972:—Preceding
861:accessing.—
732:86.3.254.48
726:Music Video
644:—Preceding
397:Hard (song)
355:Legolas2186
349:—Preceding
308:Video Phone
302:" features
164:—Preceding
36:This is an
6189:WP:CRYSTAL
6163:WP:CRYSTAL
6146:WP:CRYSTAL
6003:liquidluck
5310:SunCreator
5232:WP:CRYSTAL
5213:WP:CRYSTAL
5164:Theuhohreo
4802:SunCreator
4713:SunCreator
4694:Stevevance
4586:and then:
4543:SunCreator
4501:Amazon MP3
4206:refimprove
3928:never ever
3796:SunCreator
3428:SunCreator
3342:SunCreator
3219:Radio adds
3152:SunCreator
3123:SunCreator
3097:the source
3055:SunCreator
3015:Amazon.com
2996:SunCreator
2992:WP:CRYSTAL
2793:SunCreator
2778:SunCreator
2766:WP:CRYSTAL
2668:SunCreator
2488:SunCreator
2454:SunCreator
2365:SunCreator
2312:SunCreator
2278:SunCreator
2071:SunCreator
1925:SunCreator
1893:SunCreator
1855:SunCreator
1808:SunCreator
1749:SunCreator
1731:SunCreator
1697:SunCreator
1639:SunCreator
1612:SunCreator
1590:SunCreator
1514:Just Dance
1329:SunCreator
1288:SunCreator
1222:let's talk
1200:UK Release
1180:SunCreator
1029:SunCreator
797:SunCreator
710:SunCreator
629:SunCreator
595:No source!
561:Morgan3136
456:, though.
190:SunCreator
125:2009-11-30
5847:hideliho!
5639:STEF1995S
5421:Paparazzi
5404:Nbeau1989
5221:hideliho!
5018:Hell no.
4682:Alphabeat
4620:Calvin999
4539:TuneTribe
4327:CD Single
4100:Popersman
4064:Popersman
4029:Thanks.
3882:Billboard
3825:hideliho!
3757:Gaga/GaGa
3069:CD Single
2768:. iTunes
2682:Paparazzi
2361:this song
1375:summarize
145:AnomieBOT
72:Archive 3
67:Archive 2
61:Archive 1
6380:edit war
6150:Oakshade
6105:Oakshade
6064:Oakshade
5998:Disagree
5979:Disagree
5912:Disagree
5750:Disagree
5649:unsigned
5581:contribs
5569:unsigned
5496:unsigned
5472:disagree
5440:contribs
5428:unsigned
5423:video.
5400:Disagree
5382:Disagree
5256:tb240904
5064:unsigned
4907:Candyo32
4886:Disagree
4778:unsigned
4751:unsigned
4643:unsigned
4628:contribs
4616:unsigned
4479:"iTunes"
4349:contribs
4337:unsigned
4285:mattbuck
4239:unsigned
4214:mattbuck
4194:Fox News
4162:wP:UNDUE
4046:contribs
4038:Jms melb
4034:unsigned
4005:contribs
3997:Jms melb
3993:unsigned
3985:Source:
3960:unsigned
3766:unsigned
3736:unsigned
3511:contribs
3499:unsigned
3469:contribs
3457:unsigned
3446:The Fame
3420:The Fame
3416:The Fame
3390:unsigned
3386:right?
3380:The Fame
3329:contribs
3317:unsigned
3243:Candyo32
3039:Celestra
3011:Facebook
2740:cover.--
2651:AGREED.—
1667:Candyo32
1518:Candyo32
1510:LoveGame
1508:'s like
1277:contribs
1265:unsigned
1250:contribs
1238:unsigned
1095:unsigned
1069:unsigned
986:contribs
974:unsigned
882:verified
691:single.
646:unsigned
501:wP:SONGS
363:contribs
351:unsigned
300:LoveGame
241:It's Flo
186:WP:NSONG
166:unsigned
6404:Legolas
6313:Legolas
6262:Ryūlóng
6228:Ryūlóng
6197:Legolas
6172:Ryūlóng
6125:Legolas
5899:Legolas
5877:Comment
5860:Jayy008
5782:Legolas
5738:Legolas
5712:Legolas
5599:Legolas
5573:Shelisa
5476:Jayy008
5470:Strong
5329:Jayy008
5286:Jayy008
5195:Comment
5178:Comment
5160:Sdoo493
5088:Legolas
5023:Legolas
5001:Sdoo493
4966:Legolas
4927:Legolas
4737:undated
4690:covered
4686:YouTube
4553:Ryūlóng
4514:Ryūlóng
4190:Queerty
4169:Legolas
4082:Legolas
4017:Jayy008
3889:Legolas
3839:Legolas
3817:severly
3651:Legolas
3631:Sdoo493
3589:Legolas
3558:Legolas
3527:Legolas
3359:Legolas
3264:Iknow23
3227:Iknow23
3201:Iknow23
3169:Legolas
2923:Legolas
2888:Legolas
2864:Sdoo493
2844:Legolas
2810:Legolas
2689:Legolas
2653:Iknow23
2602:Iknow23
2572:Iknow23
2534:Iknow23
2532:image.—
2517:Sdoo493
2480:discogs
2424:Legolas
2231:Legolas
2110:Legolas
2093:Iknow23
1993:Legolas
1962:Legolas
1911:Iknow23
1878:Iknow23
1840:Legolas
1822:Iknow23
1789:Iknow23
1715:Legolas
1550:" and "
1546:" and "
1540:WP:lead
1371:WP:Lead
1350:Legolas
1343:WP:LEAD
1046:Legolas
950:Iknow23
914:Legolas
863:Iknow23
858:Webcite
827:YouTube
823:Twitter
776:Legolas
696:Legolas
613:Iknow23
508:Legolas
315:Legolas
39:archive
6056:longer
5934:Ggoere
5306:WP:COI
4820:SveroH
4769:Legacy
4599:Plumpy
4535:Amazon
4486:IainUK
4331:SOURCE
3933:Ggoere
3450:Circus
3374:oldest
3183:is not
2972:SOURCE
2756:Single
2600:say).—
1150:As of
934:Jassiq
497:WP:WAX
204:Single
6052:Agree
6020:Agree
5930:Agree
5917:Spyco
5885:hotch
5795:Agree
5761:яαdcя
5688:Agree
5631:Agree
5561:Agree
5489:Agree
5417:Agree
5324:can't
5252:Agree
5156:Agree
5119:Agree
5055:Agree
4997:Agree
4942:Agree
4903:Agree
4816:Agree
4531:Tesco
4385:Chzz
4365:tilde
4143:Chase
3461:YZJay
3217:with
2774:WP:RS
2742:Aaa16
2731:manu!
2508:manu!
2146:яαdcя
1804:WP:RS
889:яαdcя
834:яαdcя
674:яαdcя
555:promo
132:From
112:From
16:<
6356:talk
6337:talk
6300:talk
6286:talk
6250:talk
6154:talk
6138:song
6109:talk
6101:more
6087:talk
6068:talk
6039:talk
6009:talk
5987:talk
5966:talk
5938:talk
5921:talk
5864:talk
5843:Nymf
5825:talk
5768:chat
5731:want
5696:talk
5676:talk
5666:See
5657:talk
5643:talk
5617:talk
5577:talk
5533:talk
5504:talk
5480:talk
5459:talk
5436:talk
5408:talk
5391:talk
5347:talk
5333:talk
5314:talk
5290:talk
5272:talk
5240:talk
5217:Nymf
5211:See
5203:talk
5186:talk
5168:talk
5144:talk
5127:talk
5105:talk
5072:talk
5041:talk
5006:talk
4983:talk
4950:talk
4911:talk
4894:talk
4874:talk
4860:talk
4841:talk
4824:talk
4806:talk
4786:talk
4759:talk
4733:)
4731:talk
4717:talk
4698:talk
4667:talk
4651:talk
4624:talk
4603:talk
4537:and
4490:talk
4463:talk
4444:talk
4430:talk
4412:talk
4377:Done
4345:talk
4306:talk
4291:Talk
4273:talk
4247:talk
4220:Talk
4151:talk
4104:talk
4068:talk
4042:talk
4021:talk
4001:talk
3968:talk
3937:talk
3917:talk
3871:talk
3821:Nymf
3800:talk
3791:Done
3774:talk
3744:talk
3724:talk
3694:talk
3688:. --
3668:talk
3636:talk
3615:talk
3575:talk
3544:talk
3507:talk
3492:talk
3465:talk
3432:talk
3398:talk
3382:and
3346:talk
3325:talk
3304:talk
3268:talk
3247:talk
3231:talk
3221:and
3205:talk
3191:talk
3156:talk
3142:talk
3127:talk
3111:talk
3082:talk
3059:talk
3043:talk
3025:talk
3009:But
3000:talk
2981:talk
2940:talk
2910:talk
2869:talk
2830:talk
2797:talk
2782:talk
2746:talk
2707:talk
2672:talk
2657:talk
2628:talk
2618:and
2606:talk
2591:talk
2576:talk
2552:Acro
2538:talk
2522:talk
2492:talk
2458:talk
2443:talk
2392:talk
2369:talk
2316:talk
2298:talk
2282:talk
2189:talk
2153:chat
2097:talk
2075:talk
2044:talk
2030:talk
2010:talk
1979:talk
1948:talk
1929:talk
1915:talk
1897:talk
1882:talk
1859:talk
1826:talk
1812:talk
1793:talk
1753:talk
1735:talk
1701:talk
1671:talk
1643:talk
1616:talk
1594:talk
1575:talk
1560:talk
1522:talk
1493:and
1430:talk
1411:talk
1396:talk
1333:talk
1317:talk
1292:talk
1273:talk
1246:talk
1184:talk
1160:Acro
1142:talk
1103:talk
1077:talk
1033:talk
1026:here
1024:And
1015:talk
982:talk
954:talk
938:talk
896:chat
876:Per
867:talk
841:chat
801:talk
755:talk
736:talk
714:talk
681:chat
654:talk
633:talk
617:talk
582:talk
565:talk
546:talk
538:here
487:talk
462:Acro
445:talk
420:Acro
377:talk
359:talk
333:talk
289:talk
268:talk
245:talk
217:talk
194:talk
174:talk
101:this
6167:may
6140:is
5759:• в
4509:you
4505:HMV
4459:Kww
4426:Kww
4408:Kww
4127:NME
3102:not
2881:MTV
2724:--♫
2224:RPM
2144:• в
1458:pop
1124:UDI
887:• в
832:• в
672:• в
6402:--
6358:)
6339:)
6311:--
6302:)
6288:)
6271:)
6268:ç«śéľ™
6252:)
6244:--
6237:)
6234:ç«śéľ™
6195:--
6181:)
6178:ç«śéľ™
6156:)
6123:--
6111:)
6089:)
6070:)
6041:)
5989:)
5968:)
5940:)
5923:)
5897:--
5882:Tb
5866:)
5827:)
5780:--
5736:--
5710:--
5698:)
5678:)
5659:)
5619:)
5597:--
5583:)
5579:•
5535:)
5506:)
5482:)
5461:)
5442:)
5438:•
5410:)
5393:)
5359:.
5349:)
5335:)
5322:I
5316:)
5292:)
5274:)
5242:)
5234:.
5205:)
5188:)
5170:)
5146:)
5129:)
5107:)
5086:--
5074:)
5043:)
5021:--
4985:)
4964:--
4952:)
4925:--
4913:)
4896:)
4876:)
4862:)
4843:)
4826:)
4818:--
4808:)
4788:)
4761:)
4719:)
4700:)
4669:)
4653:)
4630:)
4626:•
4605:)
4597:--
4562:)
4559:ç«śéľ™
4533:,
4523:)
4520:ç«śéľ™
4492:)
4465:)
4446:)
4432:)
4424:.—
4414:)
4391:â–ş
4347:•
4308:)
4275:)
4249:)
4209:}}
4203:{{
4167:--
4154:)
4106:)
4080:--
4070:)
4048:)
4044:•
4023:)
4007:)
4003:•
3970:)
3939:)
3919:)
3913:JY
3887:--
3873:)
3867:JY
3837:--
3819:.
3802:)
3776:)
3746:)
3726:)
3696:)
3670:)
3649:--
3617:)
3587:--
3577:)
3556:--
3546:)
3525:--
3513:)
3509:•
3471:)
3467:•
3434:)
3426:.
3400:)
3357:--
3348:)
3331:)
3327:•
3306:)
3270:)
3249:)
3233:)
3207:)
3193:)
3167:--
3158:)
3144:)
3129:)
3113:)
3084:)
3061:)
3045:)
3027:)
3002:)
2994:?
2983:)
2942:)
2921:--
2912:)
2904:--
2886:--
2862:--
2842:--
2832:)
2808:--
2799:)
2784:)
2748:)
2709:)
2687:--
2674:)
2659:)
2630:)
2608:)
2593:)
2578:)
2559:X
2540:)
2494:)
2460:)
2445:)
2422:--
2394:)
2371:)
2318:)
2300:)
2284:)
2276:.
2229:--
2191:)
2108:--
2099:)
2077:)
2046:)
2032:)
2012:)
1991:--
1981:)
1960:--
1950:)
1931:)
1917:)
1899:)
1884:)
1861:)
1838:--
1828:)
1814:)
1795:)
1755:)
1747:.
1737:)
1713:--
1703:)
1673:)
1645:)
1618:)
1596:)
1577:)
1562:)
1524:)
1512:,
1506:GA
1499:FA
1497:,
1468:,
1432:)
1413:)
1398:)
1386:,
1382:,
1348:--
1335:)
1319:)
1294:)
1275:•
1252:)
1248:•
1214:Dt
1186:)
1167:X
1144:)
1117:A8
1105:)
1079:)
1044:--
1035:)
1017:)
988:)
984:•
956:)
944:)
940:)
912:--
869:)
803:)
774:--
757:)
749:--
738:)
716:)
694:--
656:)
635:)
619:)
584:)
567:)
548:)
506:--
489:)
469:X
447:)
427:X
379:)
361:•
335:)
313:--
291:)
271:)
247:)
239:--
219:)
196:)
176:)
136::
116::
6387:Îľ
6354:(
6335:(
6298:(
6284:(
6265:(
6248:(
6231:(
6175:(
6152:(
6107:(
6085:(
6066:(
6037:(
6006:âś˝
5985:(
5964:(
5936:(
5919:(
5862:(
5823:(
5763:o
5694:(
5674:(
5655:(
5641:(
5615:(
5575:(
5531:(
5502:(
5478:(
5457:(
5434:(
5406:(
5389:(
5345:(
5331:(
5312:(
5288:(
5270:(
5238:(
5201:(
5184:(
5166:(
5142:(
5125:(
5103:(
5070:(
5039:(
5008:)
5004:(
4981:(
4948:(
4909:(
4892:(
4872:(
4858:(
4839:(
4822:(
4804:(
4784:(
4757:(
4743:.
4729:(
4715:(
4696:(
4665:(
4649:(
4622:(
4601:(
4556:(
4517:(
4488:(
4461:(
4442:(
4428:(
4410:(
4343:(
4304:(
4293:)
4289:(
4271:(
4245:(
4222:)
4218:(
4148:(
4102:(
4066:(
4040:(
4019:(
3999:(
3966:(
3935:(
3915:(
3869:(
3798:(
3772:(
3742:(
3722:(
3692:(
3666:(
3638:)
3634:(
3613:(
3573:(
3542:(
3505:(
3490:(
3463:(
3430:(
3396:(
3344:(
3323:(
3302:(
3266:(
3245:(
3229:(
3203:(
3189:(
3154:(
3140:(
3125:(
3109:(
3080:(
3057:(
3041:(
3023:(
2998:(
2979:(
2938:(
2908:(
2871:)
2867:(
2828:(
2795:(
2780:(
2744:(
2727:S
2705:(
2670:(
2655:(
2626:(
2604:(
2589:(
2574:(
2536:(
2524:)
2520:(
2504:S
2490:(
2456:(
2441:(
2390:(
2367:(
2314:(
2296:(
2280:(
2187:(
2148:o
2095:(
2073:(
2042:(
2028:(
2008:(
1977:(
1946:(
1927:(
1913:(
1895:(
1880:(
1876:—
1857:(
1824:(
1810:(
1791:(
1751:(
1733:(
1699:(
1669:(
1641:(
1614:(
1592:(
1573:(
1558:(
1520:(
1428:(
1409:(
1394:(
1331:(
1315:(
1290:(
1271:(
1244:(
1182:(
1140:(
1101:(
1075:(
1031:(
1013:(
980:(
952:(
936:(
891:o
865:(
836:o
799:(
753:(
734:(
712:(
676:o
652:(
631:(
615:(
580:(
563:(
544:(
485:(
443:(
375:(
357:(
342:"
331:(
287:(
265:(
243:(
215:(
192:(
172:(
149:⚡
128:.
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
