542:
didn't search for "Mabbett" and see no reason to - the notability is the publication, not the authors or coauthors, though for that reason, I see no harm in minor details that provide evidence of their qualifications to enhance the credibility of this publication. As for your search, 5.320 is not really that bad, either. Searching just "The
Amazing Pudding" in quotes gave me about 11, 400 hits. I am not sure what your "grammar" concern is, precisely. All I am saying is that one tag is plenty and the other two are overkill and not really accurate. Article appears adequately notable, certainly more so than some I've tried and failed to dump. I have no real comment about the minutae of the article content, though clearly it would benefit from some expansion. Like I said earlier, it feels like there is a personal agenda going on here.
573:). You have removed the templates, so the onus is on you to address the signaled problems. I assume that you identified multiple reliable sources establishing notability among the thousands of Ghits that you found, so it would be great if those could be added to the article. As for relevance: the article is about the magazine. Biographical information about people that were involved with it doesn't belong here but in bios on these people (if they are notable). Thanks. --
254:
226:
21:
314:
100:
240:
149:
131:
71:
562:
and retract your remarks about "snarky personal attacks" and "a personal agenda"? Mabbett is an editor in good standing and I certainly have no personal agenda with respect to him (or anyone else for that matter), nor do I have any intention to be "snarky" towards anybody. I also know John
Vandenberg
501:
Relevance is if these individuals have notability as writers on PF due to other published works. Doing a search on the publication gave me about 38,000 google hits, so it appears notable. As I see it, the only relevant tag is the COI one, which is appropriate, the other two are just snarky personal
631:
Personally, if there is a need for a dab page and both articles linked from there, I have no problem with that. I also have no issues with folks improving and expanding this article. So long as no one brings up personalities, either to ridiculously narrow a google search or otherwise to suggest or
664:
Your assumptions of our motives are off; Randykitty and I work on periodicals. I've been doing it since 2007. Randykitty is much newer, but their first edits were about periodicals and they have done a shitload of great work in this topical area in a short period of time. Articles about obscure
617:
more weight should be put on the first performance of this work under the title 'Amazing
Pudding' than a fanzine from much latter. There may be a way to mention the fanzine in the same paragraph, but I couldnt find a way to do it without reducing readability unnecessarily. From what I have seen,
541:
and got 37,000-38,000 hits, The
Amazing Pudding without quotes was not reliable (29 million or something, but many irrelevant hits) The Amazing Pudding Pink Floyd (no quotes) got 128,000, so I took a logical search suggested by Google to narrow it. I suppose it's all in how one crunches it; I
520:
What search terms did you use? "The
Amazing Pudding" "Mabbett" only returns 5,320 results for me. However you have not addressed my question, which is a matter of grammar foremost - the 'when' introduces a temporal relationship, however the relevance of that temporal relationship isnt clear.
684:
gave me 37,900 but whatever. My point was that the tag-bombing was not needed and I smelled an agenda to argue this was not a notable periodical and so I simply did a basic search to show otherwise. Either way, it seems you acknowledge basic notability, and that's really all I was actually
589:
I tagged it because it has a lot of snippets of trivia that dont appear to be related to the topic at hand. If they are all removed, the article would likely be deleted. I would prefer to see if these issues can be resolved by normal editing rather than during a deletion discussion.
487:, not here. Further, why is it "tag bombing" that needs explaining to tag an article for notability if all that said article has are 10 references to publications by the editors of the magazine themselves and one in-passing mention on a fan-club website of uncertain reliability? --
632:
hint that the presence of a certain person is grounds for tag-bombing based on notability, then I'm fine. Much better to just edit the article and make it better than to waste bandwidth here discussing problems. I'm glad to see some edits to improve the article.
482:
article that
Mabbett and MacDonald wrote books on PF? Why is "Trueman also published the Syd Barrett magazine, Opel, before founding Delerium Records" relevant for this article? If Trueman is notable, this should be in a biographical article about
658:, Since you are banging on about search keywords, please look at your link above again. You had used quotes, but then somehow they were lost. They keywords the 'amazing pudding fanzine' without quotes has 398,000 results; when quotes
662:, there are only 5,500 results. Which is roughly the same as the search terms I used - my search used Mabbett in my search terms because any indepth coverage of this fanzine would mention the mainstay editor.
563:
long enough to know that this will be the same for him. In contrast, removing valid maintenance tags without addressing the problem is considered disruptive editing (which is why we have templates like
538:
81:
708:
206:
304:
718:
189:
195:
733:
294:
539:
https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=%22The+Amazing+Pudding%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8#q=the+amazing+pudding+fanzine&rls=en
738:
728:
386:
352:
322:
270:
723:
362:
165:
375:
Expand all articles to at least Start class. Some song stubs can't be expanded and should be redirected to the relevant album article. Use the "
713:
463:
Why is there a 'when' in "Mabbett wrote the official programme notes, when Pink Floyd were inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame."
55:
261:
231:
156:
136:
39:
681:
31:
111:
618:
the title
Amazing Pudding should be a redirect to the suite, and the fanzine renamed to 'The Amazing Pudding (magazine)'.
77:
436:
435:
This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not
35:
610:
117:
99:
49:
376:
269:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
164:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
659:
667:
620:
592:
578:
523:
492:
468:
70:
682:
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22The+Amazing+Pudding%22%20fanzine#q=The+Amazing+Pudding+fanzine
45:
567:
407:
559:
574:
488:
356:
686:
653:
633:
555:
543:
515:
503:
702:
416:
Personally invite quality editors working on Pink Floyd articles to join the project.
365:
around to 300 pixels (all "fair use" images), other than album covers (already done).
253:
225:
313:
691:
671:
638:
624:
596:
582:
548:
527:
508:
496:
472:
266:
30:
to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
148:
130:
613:. The "toby62" source does mention both in the same piece of prose, but
161:
382:
Expand all of the Floyd's studio album articles to at least GA status.
239:
426:
If you complete one of these tasks, please remove it from the list.
355:
to all images and sound samples (all except images already labeled
93:
65:
15:
601:
In the interests of transparency, I'll note here that I have
342:
312:
28:
contributor may be personally or professionally connected
466:
What is the relevance of the last part of the sentence.
606:
602:
537:
Well, I believe that I took Google's advice and used
265:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
160:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
665:periodicals are what we do do month in, month out.
194:This article has not yet received a rating on the
379:" article as an example when editing a song stub.
8:
97:
58:) This user has contributed to the article.
330:
220:
125:
709:Articles edited by connected contributors
211:for tips on how to improve this article.
222:
127:
279:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Pink Floyd
174:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Magazines
7:
719:Unknown-importance magazine articles
259:This article is within the scope of
207:WikiProject Magazines' writing guide
154:This article is within the scope of
116:It is of interest to the following
734:Low-importance Pink Floyd articles
478:Similarly, why is it relevant for
14:
252:
238:
224:
147:
129:
98:
69:
19:
739:WikiProject Pink Floyd articles
729:Start-Class Pink Floyd articles
299:This article has been rated as
282:Template:WikiProject Pink Floyd
80:on 7 April 2018. The result of
76:This article was nominated for
724:WikiProject Magazines articles
413:to all appropriate Talk pages.
177:Template:WikiProject Magazines
26:The following Knowledge (XXG)
1:
714:Start-Class magazine articles
273:and see a list of open tasks.
168:and see a list of open tasks.
755:
692:07:44, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
680:To me it's a minor point,
672:07:37, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
639:01:22, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
625:14:48, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
597:12:05, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
583:11:20, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
549:03:46, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
528:23:46, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
509:21:41, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
497:09:19, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
473:03:21, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
305:project's importance scale
196:project's importance scale
611:Atom Heart Mother (suite)
329:
320:
298:
247:
202:
193:
142:
124:
502:attacks on the editor.
459:Relevance and notability
321:This article was a past
401:WikiProject Pink Floyd
377:Interstellar Overdrive
317:
262:WikiProject Pink Floyd
106:This article is rated
323:project collaboration
316:
157:WikiProject Magazines
110:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
40:neutral point of view
389:for monthly collabs.
363:Re-size large images
32:conflict of interest
558:: Would you kindly
285:Pink Floyd articles
685:fretting about.
353:fair use rationale
318:
112:content assessment
560:assume good faith
456:
455:
452:
451:
448:
447:
444:
443:
440:
422:
421:
219:
218:
215:
214:
180:magazine articles
92:
91:
64:
63:
746:
689:
670:
657:
636:
623:
609:a backlink from
595:
572:
566:
546:
526:
519:
506:
471:
434:
412:
406:
394:Project building
343:
331:
287:
286:
283:
280:
277:
256:
249:
248:
243:
242:
241:
236:
228:
221:
182:
181:
178:
175:
172:
151:
144:
143:
133:
126:
109:
103:
102:
94:
73:
66:
23:
22:
16:
754:
753:
749:
748:
747:
745:
744:
743:
699:
698:
687:
668:John Vandenberg
666:
651:
634:
621:John Vandenberg
619:
593:John Vandenberg
591:
570:
564:
544:
524:John Vandenberg
522:
513:
504:
469:John Vandenberg
467:
461:
432:
431:
430:
429:
410:
404:
284:
281:
278:
275:
274:
237:
234:
179:
176:
173:
170:
169:
107:
20:
12:
11:
5:
752:
750:
742:
741:
736:
731:
726:
721:
716:
711:
701:
700:
697:
696:
695:
694:
675:
674:
663:
648:
647:
646:
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:
586:
585:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
460:
457:
454:
453:
450:
449:
446:
445:
442:
441:
433:
423:
420:
419:
418:
417:
414:
391:
390:
383:
380:
367:
366:
360:
341:
340:
339:
336:
335:
327:
326:
319:
309:
308:
301:Low-importance
297:
291:
290:
288:
271:the discussion
257:
245:
244:
235:Low‑importance
229:
217:
216:
213:
212:
200:
199:
192:
186:
185:
183:
166:the discussion
152:
140:
139:
134:
122:
121:
115:
104:
90:
89:
82:the discussion
74:
62:
61:
60:
59:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
751:
740:
737:
735:
732:
730:
727:
725:
722:
720:
717:
715:
712:
710:
707:
706:
704:
693:
690:
683:
679:
678:
677:
676:
673:
669:
661:
655:
650:
649:
640:
637:
630:
629:
628:
627:
626:
622:
616:
612:
608:
604:
600:
599:
598:
594:
588:
587:
584:
580:
576:
569:
561:
557:
553:
552:
551:
550:
547:
540:
529:
525:
517:
512:
511:
510:
507:
500:
499:
498:
494:
490:
486:
481:
477:
476:
475:
474:
470:
464:
458:
438:
428:
427:
415:
409:
402:
398:
397:
396:
395:
388:
384:
381:
378:
374:
373:
372:
371:
364:
361:
358:
354:
350:
349:
348:
345:
344:
338:
337:
333:
332:
328:
324:
315:
311:
310:
306:
302:
296:
293:
292:
289:
272:
268:
264:
263:
258:
255:
251:
250:
246:
233:
230:
227:
223:
210:
209:
208:
201:
197:
191:
188:
187:
184:
167:
163:
159:
158:
153:
150:
146:
145:
141:
138:
135:
132:
128:
123:
119:
113:
105:
101:
96:
95:
87:
83:
79:
75:
72:
68:
67:
57:
54:
51:
47:
46:Pigsonthewing
44:
43:
41:
37:
36:autobiography
33:
29:
25:
18:
17:
614:
536:
484:
479:
465:
462:
425:
424:
400:
393:
392:
369:
368:
346:
300:
260:
205:
204:
155:
118:WikiProjects
85:
52:
27:
334:To-do list:
108:Start-class
703:Categories
575:Randykitty
489:Randykitty
437:create one
276:Pink Floyd
267:Pink Floyd
232:Pink Floyd
688:Montanabw
654:Montanabw
635:Montanabw
556:Montanabw
545:Montanabw
516:Montanabw
505:Montanabw
171:Magazines
162:magazines
137:Magazines
660:are used
607:replaced
568:uw-tdel1
370:Articles
357:free use
347:Fair use
78:deletion
56:contribs
603:removed
408:WPFloyd
403:banner
303:on the
114:scale.
38:, and
615:a lot
605:and
579:talk
493:talk
480:this
399:Add
387:COTM
385:See
351:Add
203:See
86:keep
84:was
50:talk
485:him
295:Low
190:???
42:.
705::
581:)
571:}}
565:{{
495:)
411:}}
405:{{
359:).
34:,
656::
652:@
577:(
554:@
518::
514:@
491:(
439:?
325:.
307:.
198:.
120::
88:.
53:·
48:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
