1326:"She has been sharply criticised for the pedestrian quality of her prose, and as vigorously defended. In her defence, for example, Clare Hanson argued in 1990 that the inert language of The Good Terrorist should be read in the same way that we read Joyce’s ‘tired style’ at the end of Ulysses: Lessing’s book ‘is a grey and textureless novel because it is “about”, or speaks, a grey and textureless language: it is, surely, quite missing the point to see the drabness as the symptom of authorial laziness.’Unfortunately this position becomes harder to maintain as Lessing’s oeuvre increases and the leaden quality of the prose persists, regardless of its subject. The two Lessings – the tough and the pious – are at work respectively in The Fifth Child and its sequel, Ben, in the World. The Fifth Child is a potent and suggestive piece of writing, a recasting of the ancient story of the Fall as urban fable. In its own way it is as much a novel about domestic terrorism as The Good Terrorist and, like that novel, starts with the classic paradigm of the family as a microcosm of society. It is the Swinging Sixties."
415:
394:
21:
577:
244:
54:
1101:
1076:
1042:
990:
967:
945:
923:
891:
862:
841:
782:
760:
296:
275:
175:
75:
306:
504:
483:
630:
1337:, there is freedom to group the comments for and against, to note the types of criticism, and to observe that the book divides the critics on the matter. And perhaps Lowry is exactly suitable as a cited source which comments on the divide, and could be used to organise the other quotations and opinions.
1332:
Ask if you need to see more. Perhaps it would be wise to have a scan through other likely places for different opinions of the book. The question of whether the book is "leaden" or has "strong descriptive prose" seems to demand a paragraph, maybe even a section: something must be going on if half the
1204:
behave in exactly the same way
Richard E. Rubenstein describes what happens when "ambitious idealists" are alienated from the upper and lower classes." (.. said .. behave .. describes .. are alienated .. ) Perhaps this could be simplified, split, or otherwise modified? The "same" seems redundant, at
1239:
On the themes, the first paragraph makes a good case for "House" as a significant theme. What are the other themes? Perhaps it would be wise to create a named subsection for each major theme, and to state each theme and the evidence for it explicitly. For example, is terrorism itself actually a
1344:
I'm not totally convinced of the split between the 'Themes and analysis' (by critics) section and the 'Reception' (by critics). Sure, bland comments like "fascinating book" and "extremely well written" (see Lowry, above, or your quotes from
Donoghue for a different opinion) are definitely not
1391:
Would it be possible for you to put this nom on hold for a couple of weeks? I like the suggestions you've made and I want to address them, but I am quite busy at the moment and it's going to take me a little while to work through this. Thanks.
1287:
I've added a new "Genre" section, using some of the text from the "Themes and analysis" section, plus new material. What remains to do is split the "Themes and analysis" section, which I hope to have finished before the end of the week.
1345:"analysis" (to any measurable depth), but why for example are Kuehn's comments not analysis? Perhaps we should have a simple "Themes" section followed by something on critical opinion? (Again, this may affect the lead also.)
1582:
1533:
1432:
I think I've addressed all the issues you raised – thanks for waiting. Just one question: the awards and prizes the book won appear in a sentence at the end of the
Reception section. I originally had it in a table
160:
141:
35:
1572:
1529:
1340:
Now to "mixed": it's an easy cliché. But it right in this case? Perhaps we exactly don't have mixing and blurring, but division into two opposing camps, love and loathe? (This may affect the lead also.)
1567:
1157:
I've added "The" in front of the first occurrence of "Novelist X Y", the other two ("American novelist" and "British novelist") I've left as is – I'm not sure if you feel that they also "jar". —
882:, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
879:
60:
179:
122:
769:
635:
807:
668:
1248:
465:
1247:
Is Greene the only person who thinks the book a satire on terrorists? If it's not "political", can it be satirical? Kuehn seems to think it is exactly not a satire...
1136:
On style, perhaps "said she got her inspiration for the book from..." could be better phrased: Something like "said she was inspired to write by..." might do, perhaps.
658:
1607:
455:
1059:
554:
1333:
critics find the writing exceptionally flat, the rest exceptionally lively (with nobody thinking the prose is average). Without suggesting you indulge in any
1184:
Straying in the opposite direction, "unbeknownst" comes across as twee or journalistic rather than encyclopedic: "unknown" would be sufficient in the context.
1617:
811:
803:
431:
1627:
544:
1297:
I've split the "Themes and analysis" section into "Themes" and "Critical opinion". I'm not sure whether it should be "Critical opinion" or "Analysis". —
1220:
Works cited: I've taken the liberty of putting this list back to a single column, which seems to improve readability of the alphabetic list of sources.
376:
795:
1602:
196:
1632:
1255:
I've added a new paragraph in the Themes and analysis section on "satire", which includes some of Kuehn's commentary from the
Reception section. —
640:
1562:
1152:
I'm not sure if the construction "Novelist X Y wrote that..." isn't an
Americanism; for me, "The novelist X Y wrote that..." is far less jarring.
520:
1592:
366:
422:
399:
1577:
1089:
1622:
1597:
341:
339:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the
1612:
1482:
Am I the only one who finds that recent addition of an hyphen fussy, untidy, and unnecessary despite whatever the WP rule book may say.
707:
799:
1520:
This is a
British novel by a British author and it was first published in Great Britain, it should use British English spelling like
977:
663:
511:
488:
590:
900:
1587:
1051:
319:
280:
255:
30:
1063:
871:
875:
791:
686:
103:
53:
1055:
954:
826:
414:
393:
1003:
932:
682:
599:
243:
20:
1382:
I've done a bit more, but addressing your "Themes" and "Reception" issues are going to take a little longer. —
261:
40:
1454:
1409:
1269:
1171:
722:
701:
519:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
430:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
427:
189:
1240:
theme, or is it the contradiction between anarchism and bourgeoisie, or just the fact that we all have
1166:
They're all much the same, I was giving an example in the hope you'd check for and fix similar items.
1316:
I wonder if this selection of reviews really spans the field? Perhaps it would be useful to look at
1278:
Thanks; I'm still working on these sections – hope to have it finished before the end of the week. —
44:
174:
74:
1028:
1024:
1487:
1450:
1405:
1265:
1167:
1085:
718:
697:
605:
212:
1032:
849:. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
850:
737:
601:
576:
1334:
981:: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
1320:
on the book in the London Review of Books (Vol. 23 No. 6 · 22 March 2001 pages 29-30):
1556:
1544:
1506:
1483:
1464:
1438:
1419:
1393:
1383:
1374:
1365:
1350:
1298:
1289:
1279:
1256:
1241:
1225:
1211:
1190:
1158:
1142:
311:
206:
1317:
1437:, but it was changed to what it is now – I prefer the table. What do you think? —
1349:
I've (hopefully) addressed this. BTW thanks for the Lowry source, which I used. —
775:
Clear: ok; concise: ok; copyright: ok in spot checks; spelling: ok; grammar: ok
336:
603:
305:
301:
295:
274:
1547:
1537:
1509:
1491:
1467:
1458:
1441:
1422:
1413:
1396:
1386:
1377:
1368:
1353:
1301:
1292:
1282:
1273:
1259:
1228:
1214:
1193:
1175:
1161:
1145:
726:
711:
516:
183:
953:. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
689:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
1002:: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
332:
328:
1364:
Thanks for picking up this one – I look forward to your comments. —
503:
482:
1449:
Happy to promote it. Well done, and thanks for all the hard work.
324:
1583:
Knowledge (XXG) Did you know articles that are featured articles
606:
570:
237:
323:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
1501:: I don't have a problem with it, in fact I feel "13 hour"
1463:
Thank you, and for your helpful suggestions and patience. —
1573:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
1249:
Mr G. seems to think there are at least a few other books
1116:
Excellent work. This was an enjoyable article to review.
817:
Lead: ok; layout: ok; weasel: ok; fiction: ok; lists: ok
205:
Did you know ... that a critic said that the heroine of
59:
This article appeared on
Knowledge (XXG)'s Main Page as
1498:
1434:
153:
134:
115:
96:
1189:
I've reworded – please check if you think that's ok. —
1568:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
515:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
426:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
217:is neither a good person nor a good revolutionary?
1373:I've made a start, but I'll return later today. —
1069:licenses ok, lead image is of course fair usage.
770:understandable to an appropriately broad audience
8:
43:. Even so, if you can update or improve it,
39:as one of the best articles produced by the
33:; it (or a previous version of it) has been
618:
477:
388:
269:
68:
15:
1200:"Scanlan said that Lessing's comrades in
440:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Women writers
730:
241:
1210:I've reworded – I hope that's better. —
649:
621:
479:
390:
345:to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
271:
938:Clearly now of the required standard.
1608:Mid-importance Women writers articles
1242:both good and bad voices in our heads
529:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Squatting
7:
772:; spelling and grammar are correct.
509:This article is within the scope of
420:This article is within the scope of
317:This article is within the scope of
768:. the prose is clear, concise, and
260:It is of interest to the following
1618:WikiProject Women writers articles
443:Template:WikiProject Women writers
351:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Novels
14:
1628:Low-importance squatting articles
1563:Knowledge (XXG) featured articles
1251:that discuss the topic. Discuss.
1141:I've reworded as you suggested. —
1099:
1074:
1040:
988:
965:
943:
921:
889:
860:
839:
780:
758:
575:
502:
481:
413:
392:
304:
294:
273:
242:
173:
73:
52:
19:
1603:FA-Class Women writers articles
549:This article has been rated as
460:This article has been rated as
371:This article has been rated as
1633:WikiProject Squatting articles
1497:I take it you're referring to
1404:Of course, delighted to help.
880:could reasonably be challenged
532:Template:WikiProject Squatting
182:appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1:
1593:Mid-importance novel articles
1060:valid non-free use rationales
523:and see a list of open tasks.
434:and see a list of open tasks.
1578:Old requests for peer review
1548:15:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
1538:14:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
1100:
1075:
1041:
989:
966:
944:
922:
890:
861:
840:
781:
759:
1623:FA-Class squatting articles
1598:WikiProject Novels articles
687:Talk:The Good Terrorist/GA1
354:Template:WikiProject Novels
203:The text of the entry was:
1649:
1613:WikiProject Women articles
1543:Fixed – thanks for that. —
1510:04:53, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
1492:00:57, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
1468:08:51, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
1459:08:13, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
1442:06:46, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
1423:11:50, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
1414:07:10, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
1397:06:46, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
1387:14:52, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
1378:06:36, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
1354:06:46, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
1318:Elizabeth Lowry's comments
1302:06:46, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
1293:11:16, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
1283:04:47, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
1274:16:26, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
1260:14:52, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
1229:06:34, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
1215:06:34, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
1194:06:34, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
1176:06:49, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
1162:06:34, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
1146:06:34, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
960:Even coverage throughout.
851:the layout style guideline
555:project's importance scale
466:project's importance scale
377:project's importance scale
342:general Project discussion
161:Featured article candidate
142:Featured article candidate
1369:14:03, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
1264:That seems to work well.
1012:
909:
821:
746:
736:
727:13:36, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
712:13:36, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
548:
497:
459:
423:WikiProject Women writers
408:
370:
289:
268:
224:
170:
71:
67:
41:Knowledge (XXG) community
1127:An interesting article.
733:
61:Today's featured article
1588:FA-Class novel articles
1088:to the topic, and have
790:. it complies with the
446:Women writers articles
250:This article is rated
180:fact from this article
914:Broad in its coverage
512:WikiProject Squatting
254:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1006:or content dispute.
901:no original research
832:no original research
104:Good article nominee
63:on February 8, 2017.
931:. it addresses the
878:. All content that
717:I'll take this on.
1202:The Good Terrorist
1111:Overall assessment
1056:copyright statuses
1019:, if possible, by
812:list incorporation
535:squatting articles
320:WikiProject Novels
256:content assessment
213:The Good Terrorist
79:Article milestones
27:The Good Terrorist
1120:
1119:
1090:suitable captions
1062:are provided for
677:
676:
612:
611:
569:
568:
565:
564:
561:
560:
476:
475:
472:
471:
387:
386:
383:
382:
236:
235:
232:
231:
135:February 28, 2016
1640:
1530:Αμπσίνθια Στέϊση
1103:
1102:
1078:
1077:
1064:non-free content
1044:
1043:
992:
991:
969:
968:
947:
946:
925:
924:
893:
892:
872:reliable sources
864:
863:
843:
842:
784:
783:
762:
761:
731:
631:Copyvio detector
619:
607:
579:
571:
537:
536:
533:
530:
527:
506:
499:
498:
493:
485:
478:
448:
447:
444:
441:
438:
417:
410:
409:
404:
396:
389:
359:
358:
355:
352:
349:
314:
309:
308:
298:
291:
290:
285:
277:
270:
253:
247:
246:
238:
227:Featured article
225:Current status:
177:
156:
137:
118:
116:February 3, 2016
99:
78:
77:
69:
56:
31:featured article
23:
16:
1648:
1647:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1639:
1638:
1637:
1553:
1552:
1518:
1516:British English
1505:be "13-hour". —
1480:
1362:
1314:
1237:
1133:
1125:
794:guidelines for
792:Manual of Style
742:Review Comment
681:This review is
673:
645:
617:
608:
602:
584:
534:
531:
528:
525:
524:
491:
445:
442:
439:
436:
435:
402:
356:
353:
350:
347:
346:
310:
303:
283:
251:
220:
219:
201:
152:
133:
114:
95:
72:
12:
11:
5:
1646:
1644:
1636:
1635:
1630:
1625:
1620:
1615:
1610:
1605:
1600:
1595:
1590:
1585:
1580:
1575:
1570:
1565:
1555:
1554:
1551:
1550:
1517:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1479:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1361:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1313:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1295:
1285:
1236:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1224:That's fine. —
1218:
1217:
1197:
1196:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1149:
1148:
1132:
1129:
1124:
1121:
1118:
1117:
1114:
1104:
1096:
1095:
1093:
1079:
1071:
1070:
1067:
1045:
1037:
1036:
1010:
1009:
1007:
993:
985:
984:
982:
970:
962:
961:
958:
948:
940:
939:
936:
935:of the topic.
926:
918:
917:
907:
906:
904:
899:. it contains
894:
886:
885:
883:
865:
857:
856:
854:
844:
836:
835:
819:
818:
815:
804:words to watch
785:
777:
776:
773:
763:
755:
754:
744:
743:
740:
735:
716:
692:
691:
675:
674:
672:
671:
666:
661:
655:
652:
651:
647:
646:
644:
643:
641:External links
638:
633:
627:
624:
623:
616:
613:
610:
609:
604:
600:
598:
595:
594:
586:
585:
580:
574:
567:
566:
563:
562:
559:
558:
551:Low-importance
547:
541:
540:
538:
521:the discussion
507:
495:
494:
492:Low‑importance
486:
474:
473:
470:
469:
462:Mid-importance
458:
452:
451:
449:
432:the discussion
418:
406:
405:
403:Mid‑importance
397:
385:
384:
381:
380:
373:Mid-importance
369:
363:
362:
360:
357:novel articles
316:
315:
299:
287:
286:
284:Mid‑importance
278:
266:
265:
259:
248:
234:
233:
230:
229:
222:
221:
202:
197:March 28, 2015
172:
171:
168:
167:
164:
157:
149:
148:
145:
138:
130:
129:
126:
119:
111:
110:
107:
100:
97:March 19, 2015
92:
91:
88:
85:
81:
80:
65:
64:
57:
49:
48:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1645:
1634:
1631:
1629:
1626:
1624:
1621:
1619:
1616:
1614:
1611:
1609:
1606:
1604:
1601:
1599:
1596:
1594:
1591:
1589:
1586:
1584:
1581:
1579:
1576:
1574:
1571:
1569:
1566:
1564:
1561:
1560:
1558:
1549:
1546:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1526:characterized
1523:
1522:characterised
1515:
1511:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1489:
1485:
1477:
1469:
1466:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1456:
1452:
1451:Chiswick Chap
1448:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1440:
1436:
1424:
1421:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1406:Chiswick Chap
1403:
1402:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1395:
1389:
1388:
1385:
1380:
1379:
1376:
1371:
1370:
1367:
1359:
1355:
1352:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1336:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1319:
1311:
1303:
1300:
1296:
1294:
1291:
1286:
1284:
1281:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1266:Chiswick Chap
1263:
1262:
1261:
1258:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1250:
1245:
1243:
1234:
1230:
1227:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1216:
1213:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1203:
1195:
1192:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1168:Chiswick Chap
1165:
1164:
1163:
1160:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1147:
1144:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1130:
1128:
1122:
1115:
1112:
1108:
1105:
1098:
1097:
1094:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1080:
1073:
1072:
1068:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1046:
1039:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1015:
1011:
1008:
1005:
1001:
997:
994:
987:
986:
983:
980:
979:
974:
971:
964:
963:
959:
956:
955:summary style
952:
949:
942:
941:
937:
934:
930:
927:
920:
919:
915:
912:
908:
905:
902:
898:
895:
888:
887:
884:
881:
877:
873:
869:
866:
859:
858:
855:
852:
848:
845:
838:
837:
833:
829:
828:
824:
820:
816:
813:
809:
805:
801:
797:
796:lead sections
793:
789:
786:
779:
778:
774:
771:
767:
764:
757:
756:
752:
749:
745:
741:
739:
732:
729:
728:
724:
720:
719:Chiswick Chap
714:
713:
709:
706:
703:
699:
698:Chiswick Chap
696:
690:
688:
684:
679:
678:
670:
667:
665:
662:
660:
657:
656:
654:
653:
648:
642:
639:
637:
634:
632:
629:
628:
626:
625:
620:
614:
597:
596:
593:
592:
588:
587:
583:
578:
573:
572:
556:
552:
546:
543:
542:
539:
522:
518:
514:
513:
508:
505:
501:
500:
496:
490:
487:
484:
480:
467:
463:
457:
454:
453:
450:
437:Women writers
433:
429:
428:women writers
425:
424:
419:
416:
412:
411:
407:
401:
400:Women writers
398:
395:
391:
378:
374:
368:
365:
364:
361:
344:
343:
338:
337:short stories
334:
330:
326:
322:
321:
313:
312:Novels portal
307:
302:
300:
297:
293:
292:
288:
282:
279:
276:
272:
267:
263:
257:
249:
245:
240:
239:
228:
223:
218:
215:
214:
210:
208:
207:Doris Lessing
199:
198:
193:
191:
190:Did you know?
185:
181:
176:
169:
165:
163:
162:
158:
155:
151:
150:
146:
144:
143:
139:
136:
132:
131:
127:
125:
124:
120:
117:
113:
112:
108:
106:
105:
101:
98:
94:
93:
89:
86:
83:
82:
76:
70:
66:
62:
58:
55:
51:
50:
46:
42:
38:
37:
32:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1525:
1521:
1519:
1502:
1481:
1431:
1390:
1381:
1372:
1363:
1343:
1339:
1331:
1315:
1246:
1238:
1219:
1201:
1199:
1198:
1183:
1182:
1151:
1150:
1135:
1134:
1126:
1110:
1106:
1084:. media are
1081:
1050:. media are
1047:
1020:
1016:
1013:
999:
995:
976:
972:
950:
933:main aspects
928:
913:
910:
896:
876:cited inline
867:
846:
831:
825:
822:
787:
765:
751:Well-written
750:
747:
715:
704:
694:
693:
680:
669:Instructions
589:
581:
550:
510:
461:
421:
372:
340:
318:
262:WikiProjects
226:
216:
211:
204:
195:
187:
159:
154:June 5, 2016
147:Not promoted
140:
121:
102:
45:please do so
34:
26:
1524:instead of
1244:, or what?
1054:with their
1017:Illustrated
683:transcluded
123:Peer review
1557:Categories
1360:Discussion
827:Verifiable
636:Authorship
622:GA toolbox
333:novelettes
194:column on
36:identified
1499:this edit
1418:Thanks. —
1312:Reception
738:Attribute
695:Reviewer:
659:Templates
650:Reviewing
615:GA Review
526:Squatting
517:squatting
489:Squatting
209:'s novel
184:Main Page
1545:Bruce1ee
1507:Bruce1ee
1484:Rwood128
1465:Bruce1ee
1439:Bruce1ee
1420:Bruce1ee
1394:Bruce1ee
1384:Bruce1ee
1375:Bruce1ee
1366:Bruce1ee
1351:Bruce1ee
1299:Bruce1ee
1290:Bruce1ee
1280:Bruce1ee
1257:Bruce1ee
1226:Bruce1ee
1212:Bruce1ee
1191:Bruce1ee
1159:Bruce1ee
1143:Bruce1ee
1123:Comments
1086:relevant
1023:such as
1004:edit war
708:contribs
664:Criteria
582:Archives
329:novellas
252:FA-class
166:Promoted
128:Reviewed
1478:Hyphens
978:Neutral
808:fiction
553:on the
464:on the
375:on the
186:in the
87:Process
1503:should
1235:Themes
1205:least.
1058:, and
1052:tagged
1025:images
1000:Stable
810:, and
800:layout
348:Novels
325:novels
281:Novels
258:scale.
109:Listed
90:Result
1335:WP:OR
1131:Style
1033:audio
1031:, or
1029:video
1021:media
830:with
734:Rate
685:from
29:is a
1534:talk
1488:talk
1455:talk
1435:here
1410:talk
1270:talk
1172:talk
874:are
723:talk
702:talk
335:and
84:Date
957:).
545:Low
456:Mid
367:Mid
1559::
1536:)
1528:.
1490:)
1457:)
1412:)
1272:)
1174:)
1113:.
1109:.
1092:.
1082:6b
1066:.
1048:6a
1035::
1027:,
1014:6.
998:.
975:.
951:3b
929:3a
916::
911:3.
903:.
897:2c
870:.
868:2b
853:.
847:2a
834::
823:2.
814:.
806:,
802:,
798:,
788:1b
766:1a
753::
748:1.
725:)
710:)
331:,
327:,
178:A
1532:(
1486:(
1453:(
1408:(
1392:—
1288:—
1268:(
1170:(
1107:7
996:5
973:4
721:(
705:·
700:(
591:1
557:.
468:.
379:.
264::
200:.
192:"
188:"
47:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
-logo-v2.svg.png){kind=logo}
