1024:""and said that, unable to dispute this, climate deniers, "(or sceptics as they are disingenuously described in this book) "" Not only does the "author", and I use that word very liberally, change the actual wording from the the ACTUAL book, but then takes a shit on it because of it's choice of words. Great. So classy wikipedia. I can't edit the article to just delete the ( ) part and change deniers to SCEPTICS, which they are actually describes as in the book!, but someone should. Just another liberal leftist shill page. Got it.
390:
372:
717:
699:
819:
619:
601:
727:
925:
217:
196:
130:
840:
629:
483:
21:
326:
301:
71:
120:
102:
227:
1256:@ Peter, rather than "opponents of mainstream science" I've now noted that McKitrick's "primers" were a starting point for Montford. Indeed, p. 14 says that McKitrick "read the manuscript and provided perceptive reviews". If you want, you can make the case for the other fringe views you suggest, but remember
1158:
False balance, and the weight section was overloaded with an uninformed opinion from a blog, which I've removed as noted below. There are already sources in the article noting that this book promotes climate change denial, and due weight should be given to that in the lead. The skewing of the article
1089:
The first plot is historical, showing the context at the time the book was written, together with the IPCC 1990 figure the book misrepresents and its 1965 source. The second plot compares MBH99 with the 30-year global average of the 2013 reconstruction by the PAGES 2k
Consortium, which is pretty much
1260:
requires clarity about which parts of the text describe the minority view, sufficient detail of the majority view, and "controversies regarding aspects of the minority view should be clearly identified and explained." I'm surprised by your enthusiasm for blog sources, perhaps you'd like to include a
1134:
Firstly if you want to call it a "climate change denial blog" then you need sources that describe it as a "climate change denial blog": Knowledge is about verifiability, not truth. And you can't combine sources that describe it as a "global warming sceptic blog" with sources (implicit or explicit)
1143:
says "harmonize coverage in the lead with material in the body of the article". Currently the body contains a "Reception" section which contains roughly equal amounts of praise (the first paragraph) and criticism (the second paragrpah), and the lead should reflect this balance if it refers to the
1039:
It's the wording of Nick Hewitt, who's quoted from his review which says; "Unable to dispute the science, and reality, of climate change, climate deniers (or sceptics as they are disingenuously described in this book) have made sustained attempts to discredit climate scientists and the way they
1300:
the cite for your quote of Ward. The article topic is Mr
Montford's book about the hockey stick rather than about whether climate changes, so your unsourced claims about fringes and minorities don't apply. For positive reviews we have more reliable sources and more qualified people.
501:
1218:
that Matt Ridley reviewed "while conceding that he had financial interests in coal mining" which isn't about the book. I suggest that this editing has caused the article's reviews section and lead sentence to become unbalanced.
1205:
a mention of Amazon saying the cite was "another blog" (in this case a
Guardian blog), left in a negative review without noting that it's a dead link, left in Bob Ward's review in the Guardian while Andrew Montford's reply
1265:
interview with an eminent scientist who described
Montford's book as "an excellent primer"; that at least has mainstream context. As for Ridley's pieces, his self-description as having coal interests relates to his
1180:
that the book "was praised by opponents of mainstream science" without specifying that the two people still mentioned have doctorates related to economics and zoology, or identifying which unmentioned praisers
1409:
430:
570:
36:
532:
436:
1090:
up to date. PAGES 2k have published some more papers this year, going into more detail on the same dataset, but don't add anything affecting the comparison figure. . .
1434:
1394:
1273:
795:
273:
1112:, please see the source: "He is the author of Bishop Hill, one of the main websites for global warming sceptics in the UK". Also, praised and criticized introduces
1414:
1404:
519:
1389:
546:
515:
1271:
1190:
1424:
937:
801:
675:
1444:
902:
892:
557:
406:
1063:
This book was written about 10 years ago. Could someone update the plots in this article, as far as the data they are based on is still being measured?
1429:
1449:
1439:
971:
966:
961:
954:
949:
944:
681:
283:
1186:
1135:
that say "global warming scepticism is climate change denial" to conclude that it is a "climate change denial blog": that's a textbook example of
771:
397:
377:
1419:
868:
1341:"a well documented and well written book on the subject of the 'hockey wars.' It is required reading for anyone wanting to understand the
1384:
150:
1399:
1379:
651:
249:
1201:) deserve such description. Dave souza removed Ms Curry's review saying the cite was a "blog" (in this case a climatologist's blog),
1194:
744:
704:
508:
1267:
847:
824:
154:
1329:
The review section starts with fringe view proponents, starting with a blog source promoting attacks on mainstream scientists:
753:
1078:
332:
306:
1207:
642:
606:
240:
201:
739:
526:
495:
82:
55:
28:
1004:
144:
107:
1149:
867:
related articles on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
767:
51:
1262:
983:
1306:
1224:
70:
1214:
that the book "promotes climate change denial" while citing only the negative reviewers. Dave souza earlier
1357:
On that basis, I've removed this part. The author has demonstrated her lack of expertise on this topic. . .
1276:
1245:
1182:
1122:
757:
43:
54:
may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the
1333:
Several reviewers have praised the book for its content, writing style and accessibility. Climatologist
1233:
While the last sentence remains the same, the first one now helps to balance the lead, I think. Before
1145:
1074:
1029:
88:
1025:
389:
371:
1362:
1284:
1168:
1095:
1066:
1049:
761:
337:
311:
158:
1239:(before the edits I linked above), the lead didn't mention the actual purpose of the book at all. —
760:
articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly
1302:
1220:
1070:
749:
47:
650:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
405:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
248:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
989:
732:
716:
698:
1240:
1117:
1346:
1257:
985:
924:
839:
818:
726:
1358:
1280:
1164:
1160:
1113:
1091:
1045:
162:
1198:
618:
600:
1350:
634:
539:
482:
232:
32:
1365:
1310:
1287:
1251:
1228:
1171:
1153:
1128:
1082:
1052:
1033:
1373:
1136:
987:
860:
856:
1040:
work." Why are you trying to deny the choice of words of the mainstream publication
129:
20:
1334:
628:
402:
216:
195:
135:
1342:
1140:
325:
300:
864:
722:
624:
222:
125:
1296:
your "opponents of mainstream science" addition and I see that you have now
119:
101:
1163:
weight to tiny minority views in a way which misleads the reader. . . .
852:
647:
561:
245:
564:
to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject
Internet culture}}
149:. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can
1116:. Who has praised it? Not mainstream climate change scientists. —
1345:
climate skeptics and particularly the climate auditors," such as
990:
918:
64:
15:
1159:
to uncritical in-universe fringe views is a textbook case of
42:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the
31:
procedure applies to this page. This page is related to
1297:
1293:
1235:
1215:
1211:
1202:
1177:
1108:
471:
466:
461:
456:
851:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
646:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
571:
Category:Internet culture articles needing attention
401:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
244:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
800:This article has not yet received a rating on the
680:This article has not yet received a rating on the
435:This article has not yet received a rating on the
533:Category:Internet culture articles needing images
335:, a project which is currently considered to be
161:. To improve this article, please refer to the
1279:giving "equal validity" to fringe views. . .
1139:and we don't do that sort of thing. Secondly
998:This page has archives. Sections older than
8:
1410:Unknown-importance Internet culture articles
502:View all requested internet culture articles
558:Category:Internet self-classification codes
68:
1064:
813:
693:
595:
490:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
444:
366:
295:
190:
157:. To use this banner, please refer to the
96:
155:discuss matters related to book articles
1435:Unknown-importance Environment articles
1395:Low-importance England-related articles
815:
748:to improve Knowledge's coverage of the
695:
597:
368:
297:
192:
163:relevant guideline for the type of work
98:
1008:when more than 4 sections are present.
415:Knowledge:WikiProject Internet culture
1415:WikiProject Internet culture articles
1405:Start-Class Internet culture articles
418:Template:WikiProject Internet culture
7:
1390:Start-Class England-related articles
845:This article is within the scope of
640:This article is within the scope of
395:This article is within the scope of
331:This article is within the scope of
238:This article is within the scope of
141:This article is within the scope of
1425:Unknown-importance science articles
448:WikiProject Internet culture To-do:
87:It is of interest to the following
1445:Low-importance Skepticism articles
1275:. That context is needed to avoid
14:
1325:Blog source with BLP implications
1002:may be automatically archived by
780:Knowledge:WikiProject Environment
1430:Start-Class Environment articles
923:
877:Knowledge:WikiProject Skepticism
838:
817:
783:Template:WikiProject Environment
725:
715:
697:
627:
617:
599:
481:
388:
370:
324:
299:
225:
215:
194:
128:
118:
100:
69:
19:
1450:WikiProject Skepticism articles
1440:Start-Class Skepticism articles
897:This article has been rated as
880:Template:WikiProject Skepticism
278:This article has been rated as
770:and leave any messages at the
347:Knowledge:WikiProject Blogging
1:
871:and see a list of open tasks.
660:Knowledge:WikiProject Science
654:and see a list of open tasks.
409:and see a list of open tasks.
350:Template:WikiProject Blogging
258:Knowledge:WikiProject England
252:and see a list of open tasks.
56:contentious topics procedures
1420:Start-Class science articles
1083:17:39, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
663:Template:WikiProject Science
398:WikiProject Internet culture
261:Template:WikiProject England
1208:in a later Guardian article
1053:09:54, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
1034:18:05, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
171:Knowledge:WikiProject Books
1466:
1385:WikiProject Books articles
1292:Dave souza, thank you for
903:project's importance scale
802:project's importance scale
768:Knowledge:Contributing FAQ
682:project's importance scale
437:project's importance scale
284:project's importance scale
174:Template:WikiProject Books
1400:WikiProject England pages
1380:Start-Class Book articles
1339:The Hockey Stick Illusion
1144:book's reception at all.
896:
833:
799:
710:
679:
612:
443:
434:
421:Internet culture articles
383:
319:
277:
210:
113:
95:
58:before editing this page.
1366:15:27, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
1311:16:31, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
1288:11:19, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
1252:18:54, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
1229:20:58, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
1172:15:43, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
1154:11:14, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
1129:09:48, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
1020:How is this NEUTRAL pov?
264:England-related articles
52:normal editorial process
745:WikiProject Environment
742:article is part of the
39:as a contentious topic.
1210:is absent. Dave souza
1102:Recent changes to lead
1005:Lowercase sigmabot III
848:WikiProject Skepticism
752:. The aim is to write
545:All stubs are located
77:This article is rated
48:standards of behaviour
514:Pick an article from
786:Environment articles
333:WikiProject Blogging
44:purpose of Knowledge
1199:Judith Curry's blog
883:Skepticism articles
740:environment-related
643:WikiProject Science
241:WikiProject England
733:Environment portal
83:content assessment
29:contentious topics
1263:journalist's blog
1085:
1069:comment added by
1059:plot current data
1012:
1011:
977:
976:
917:
916:
913:
912:
909:
908:
812:
811:
808:
807:
772:project talk page
692:
691:
688:
687:
594:
593:
590:
589:
586:
585:
582:
581:
560:(!?); Try to get
365:
364:
361:
360:
353:Blogging articles
294:
293:
290:
289:
189:
188:
185:
184:
145:WikiProject Books
63:
62:
35:, which has been
1457:
1248:
1243:
1238:
1146:Jonathan A Jones
1125:
1120:
1111:
1007:
991:
941:
940:
927:
919:
885:
884:
881:
878:
875:
842:
835:
834:
829:
821:
814:
788:
787:
784:
781:
778:
735:
730:
729:
719:
712:
711:
701:
694:
668:
667:
666:science articles
664:
661:
658:
637:
632:
631:
621:
614:
613:
603:
596:
496:Article requests
485:
478:
477:
445:
423:
422:
419:
416:
413:
412:Internet culture
403:internet culture
392:
385:
384:
378:Internet culture
374:
367:
355:
354:
351:
348:
345:
328:
321:
320:
315:
303:
296:
266:
265:
262:
259:
256:
235:
230:
229:
228:
219:
212:
211:
206:
198:
191:
179:
178:
175:
172:
169:
151:join the project
138:
133:
132:
122:
115:
114:
104:
97:
80:
74:
73:
65:
23:
16:
1465:
1464:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1370:
1369:
1327:
1277:WP:FALSEBALANCE
1246:
1241:
1236:my recent edits
1234:
1176:Dave souza has
1123:
1118:
1107:
1106:In relation to
1104:
1061:
1042:Chemistry World
1022:
1003:
992:
986:
932:
882:
879:
876:
873:
872:
827:
785:
782:
779:
776:
775:
758:well-referenced
731:
724:
665:
662:
659:
656:
655:
633:
626:
578:
476:
420:
417:
414:
411:
410:
352:
349:
346:
343:
342:
309:
263:
260:
257:
254:
253:
231:
226:
224:
204:
176:
173:
170:
167:
166:
134:
127:
81:on Knowledge's
78:
46:, any expected
12:
11:
5:
1463:
1461:
1453:
1452:
1447:
1442:
1437:
1432:
1427:
1422:
1417:
1412:
1407:
1402:
1397:
1392:
1387:
1382:
1372:
1371:
1355:
1354:
1351:Ross McKitrick
1347:Steve McIntyre
1326:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1303:Peter Gulutzan
1254:
1221:Peter Gulutzan
1187:Financial Post
1103:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1060:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1021:
1018:
1016:
1010:
1009:
997:
994:
993:
988:
984:
982:
979:
978:
975:
974:
969:
964:
958:
957:
952:
947:
934:
933:
928:
922:
915:
914:
911:
910:
907:
906:
899:Low-importance
895:
889:
888:
886:
869:the discussion
843:
831:
830:
828:Low‑importance
822:
810:
809:
806:
805:
798:
792:
791:
789:
765:
737:
736:
720:
708:
707:
702:
690:
689:
686:
685:
678:
672:
671:
669:
652:the discussion
639:
638:
635:Science portal
622:
610:
609:
604:
592:
591:
588:
587:
584:
583:
580:
579:
577:
576:
575:
574:
565:
549:
535:
522:
504:
489:
487:
486:
475:
474:
469:
464:
459:
453:
450:
449:
441:
440:
433:
427:
426:
424:
407:the discussion
393:
381:
380:
375:
363:
362:
359:
358:
356:
329:
317:
316:
304:
292:
291:
288:
287:
280:Low-importance
276:
270:
269:
267:
250:the discussion
237:
236:
233:England portal
220:
208:
207:
205:Low‑importance
199:
187:
186:
183:
182:
180:
140:
139:
123:
111:
110:
105:
93:
92:
86:
75:
61:
60:
33:climate change
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1462:
1451:
1448:
1446:
1443:
1441:
1438:
1436:
1433:
1431:
1428:
1426:
1423:
1421:
1418:
1416:
1413:
1411:
1408:
1406:
1403:
1401:
1398:
1396:
1393:
1391:
1388:
1386:
1383:
1381:
1378:
1377:
1375:
1368:
1367:
1364:
1360:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1324:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1299:
1295:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1272:
1269:
1264:
1259:
1255:
1253:
1249:
1244:
1237:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1226:
1222:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1191:The Telegraph
1188:
1184:
1179:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1142:
1138:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1126:
1121:
1115:
1114:false balance
1110:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1058:
1054:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1019:
1017:
1014:
1006:
1001:
996:
995:
981:
980:
973:
970:
968:
965:
963:
960:
959:
956:
953:
951:
948:
946:
943:
942:
939:
936:
935:
931:
926:
921:
920:
904:
900:
894:
891:
890:
887:
870:
866:
862:
861:pseudohistory
858:
857:pseudoscience
854:
850:
849:
844:
841:
837:
836:
832:
826:
823:
820:
816:
803:
797:
794:
793:
790:
773:
769:
763:
759:
755:
751:
747:
746:
741:
734:
728:
723:
721:
718:
714:
713:
709:
706:
703:
700:
696:
683:
677:
674:
673:
670:
653:
649:
645:
644:
636:
630:
625:
623:
620:
616:
615:
611:
608:
605:
602:
598:
573:
572:
567:
566:
563:
559:
556:
554:
550:
548:
544:
542:
541:
536:
534:
531:
529:
528:
523:
521:
517:
513:
511:
510:
505:
503:
500:
498:
497:
492:
491:
488:
484:
480:
479:
473:
470:
468:
465:
463:
460:
458:
455:
454:
452:
451:
447:
446:
442:
438:
432:
429:
428:
425:
408:
404:
400:
399:
394:
391:
387:
386:
382:
379:
376:
373:
369:
357:
340:
339:
334:
330:
327:
323:
322:
318:
313:
308:
305:
302:
298:
285:
281:
275:
272:
271:
268:
251:
247:
243:
242:
234:
223:
221:
218:
214:
213:
209:
203:
200:
197:
193:
181:
177:Book articles
164:
160:
159:documentation
156:
152:
148:
147:
146:
137:
131:
126:
124:
121:
117:
116:
112:
109:
106:
103:
99:
94:
90:
84:
76:
72:
67:
66:
59:
57:
53:
49:
45:
40:
38:
34:
30:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1356:
1338:
1335:Judith Curry
1328:
1195:Geoscientist
1105:
1065:— Preceding
1062:
1041:
1023:
1015:
1013:
999:
929:
898:
846:
743:
641:
568:
552:
551:
538:
537:
525:
524:
507:
506:
494:
493:
396:
336:
279:
239:
143:
142:
136:Books portal
89:WikiProjects
41:
26:
1343:blogosphere
1141:MOS:LEADREL
1109:these edits
1026:Sukkit Aard
777:Environment
762:categorized
750:environment
705:Environment
79:Start-class
1374:Categories
1359:dave souza
1281:dave souza
1261:reputable
1165:dave souza
1092:dave souza
1046:dave souza
874:Skepticism
865:skepticism
825:Skepticism
37:designated
1270:lobbying.
1258:WP:WEIGHT
972:Archive 6
967:Archive 5
962:Archive 4
955:Archive 3
950:Archive 2
945:Archive 1
569:See also
50:, or any
1294:removing
1183:Quadrant
1161:WP:UNDUE
1079:contribs
1071:Gaehlerm
1067:unsigned
930:Archives
344:Blogging
338:inactive
312:inactive
307:Blogging
1337:called
1247:Neonate
1203:removed
1124:Neonate
1044:? . .
1000:91 days
901:on the
853:science
754:neutral
657:Science
648:Science
607:Science
562:YouTube
462:history
282:on the
255:England
246:England
202:England
1137:WP:SYN
509:Expand
85:scale.
1298:fixed
1242:Paleo
1216:added
1212:added
1178:added
1119:Paleo
938:Index
766:Read
738:This
553:Other
540:Stubs
527:Photo
472:purge
467:watch
168:Books
108:Books
1363:talk
1349:and
1307:talk
1285:talk
1268:GWPF
1225:talk
1169:talk
1150:talk
1096:talk
1075:talk
1050:talk
1030:talk
863:and
756:and
547:here
520:here
516:here
457:edit
153:and
27:The
893:Low
796:???
676:???
518:or
431:???
274:Low
1376::
1361:,
1309:)
1283:,
1250:–
1227:)
1197:,
1193:,
1189:,
1185:,
1167:,
1152:)
1127:–
1094:,
1081:)
1077:•
1048:,
1032:)
859:,
855:,
1353:.
1305:(
1223:(
1181:(
1148:(
1073:(
1028:(
905:.
804:.
774:.
764:.
684:.
555::
543::
530::
512::
499::
439:.
341:.
314:)
310:(
286:.
165:.
91::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
