Talk:The Tale of Genji - Knowledge (XXG)

3822:

recognized Asian literature ten ideal books, is also the world literature An indispensable treasure in the treasures. This book to the Japanese peace dynasty heyday as the background, through the protagonist of the life experience and love story, describes the social corruption and immoral life at the time between the upper aristocracy and the struggle between the struggle is a line throughout the book, and the source of the Of the love of marriage, it reveals the polygamous women under the tragic fate. In the aristocratic society, male and female marriage is often a means of struggle with the political, women have become a tool for political transactions and aristocratic men in the hands of plaything.: -->

1643:

place in the popular mindset that is different from that enjoyed by other works of literature (almost every person I talk to about it feels like they should read Genji, and no other classic has had so many anime, manga, and modern novel versions of it.) Note that the original note did not say "Genji is the greatest work of Japanese literature". It said "widely considered to be the greatest work". Feel free to reword that if you wish, but acknolwedging Genji's place in the Japanese literature canon is not just classed as "POV". If you think that, then you might want to go edit out the similar statements that are found in the articles on Bach, Beethoven, Shakespeare, Einstein, and others.

3758:"The tale of Genji" writing in the 1001-1008 years, "monogatari" is a Japanese literary genre, it was the world's first novel, is a thirty million Japanese family immortal national literature. To the Heian Dynasty's heyday as the background, through the protagonist of Genji's life experience and love story, describing the political corruption of the society at that time and promiscuous life. The upper nobility mutual strife and struggle for power is a main theme throughout the book, but Genji love and marriage, it reveals the tragic fate of women under polygamy. In the aristocratic society, Women becomes political transaction tools and noble man's plaything<:ref: --> 2497:

That's an improvement, but I still don't buy it. Suppose Genji raped the Empress. Don't you think the Tenno would have done something? How about if someone raped one of Genji's wives, would Genji not have taken some action? I think action would have been taken, which is why noblemen didn't rape the Empress or the wives of Genji. They feared, at the very least, social sanctions. I'm sure rape happened in Heiankyo, but similar things have been known to happen in modern times at the Kennedy compound and in the hotel suites of NBA stars. That doesn't mean the society accepts it, or that all NBA stars think they can do it and get away with it.

2959: 665: 644: 770: 749: 2918: 838: 3790:, and is the world's first novel and a classic of Japanese literature . Set against the backdrop of the height of the Heian Dynasty, the novel uses the story of Genji's life and loves to describe the political corruption and promiscuity of the time. The novel's main theme is the strife and struggles for power among the upper nobility, but through the stories of Genji's love and marriages, it also reveals the tragic fate for women under polygamy, as women in this aristocratic society become playthings for the noble men and tools for political transactions. : --> 2566:, which is not allowed on Knowledge (XXG). Arnold’s supposition (quoted) is just plain wrong, because that's not what the customs of the period required of women. Knowledge (XXG) has conventions for dealing with these problems; I suggest the two of you observe them if you’re going to deal with this. You will have to do some research and find either a refutation of Arnold’s claim (good luck) and balance it with that refutation, or remove her claim because (1) it taken out of context here, since the full context in which she made the statement was not about 207: 225: 574: 553: 2390:

could initiate divorce and take their property with them when they left. The shift towards the downtrodden image people entertain today did not start until much later in Japanese history, and it started with the warrior class and in some aspects did not necessarily extend to the merchant and farming classes until as recently as the 19th century when warrior-class values were imposed directly on the whole population, in the process of post-Edo nation-building, as the “essence” of Japaneseness.

31: 2413:

not a noble and Genji had no reason to treat her as the equal to her. On the contrary, if I recall correctly, he said to Utsusemi "I am the person any of whose desires are permissible". The similar can be said to Murasaki-no-ue. While she is in a loyal lineage, her social status is very weak and not different from the other lower women with whom Genji had love affairs. It should be summarized "lower-ranked people's weakness" rather than "women's weakness", I suppose. --

4095:). Mills writes: "It has been suggested that he perhaps omitted Chapter 38, Suzumushi, 'The Bell Cricket', because it is concerned largely with religious matters, but the most likely explanation is that he wished to avoid breaking the continuity between the end of Chapter 37 and the beginning of 39, both of which deal with Yugiri." So there we have two possible explanations, though I'm not sure in how much detail these should be added to this article. 1573:

Knowledge (XXG) pages, to be novels (or at least as much a novel as The Tale of Genji), and from around the 3rd century AD and 1st cenutry AD, respectively. There's no question that the Tale of Genji has been "called the world's first novel, the first modern novel, the first psychological novel or the first novel still to be considered a classic," but, again, it seems to me that it should make some mention of, essentially, confirmed earlier novels.

95: 64: 675: 3157:

found, it should be included. About the movie link, if there were a dozen links, I would say cull it, but this is one link. There should be mention if it was the first, best, or best known movie on the subject, but just the two points that it is (1) a movie depicting a topic, and (2) the only one linked in the External Links section, makes it an appropriate & relevant addition. I am in favor of restoring all active links.

276: 2845:

tenth-century Japan are taught to be completely docile and submissive to the male figures in their lives. The only resistance they exert is of the passive kind, i.e. with admonitions, feigning illness, and concealing themselves as much as possible from men. In contrast, the women of sixteenth-century France are much more assertive in defending themselves from physical abuses and ill treatment from men.

455: 434: 2792:

pages from major characters, but that proved very cumbersome. For one thing, I didn’t have enough material to justify the creation of new wiki entries. Therefore, I got back to the main character list and continued from there, hoping I’ll figure out something by the time I reach chapter 54 (I’m entering characters chronologically using Tyler's edition). How would a separate page entitled

465: 22: 105: 3029:

those who read me" and since it is not properly formatted as a quote, it is hard to tell where the quote is supposed to end. Additionally, there is no citation provided for me to check whether it is a quote or not so I can format it correctly. I am tempted to remove it until a inline citation can be provided as well as an indication of how far the quote is to extend.

1434:

point. I think this article should make an explicit attempt to dislodge it from the heads of others. How about we have the head of the article say something like, "Though Genji is sometimes called the first novel, this claim is not generally accepted (see "Literary context" for more)." and then a link to the part of the entry where the first novel claim is debunked.--

869: 2466:

ranking, but still a man, had raped Murasaki and the Empress. Now, according to Arnold's statement, both Murasaki and the Empress would have submitted to this. And the guard wouldn't have had any fear of punishment. Does anyone believe this? This statement is bilge, and should be removed. I'll do it myself unless someone has a convincing reason not to.

1653:

obvious, especially to people who are not familiar with Japanese literature. Old does not necessarily mean good, and sometimes a work is considered a "classic" merely because it's the only thing that survives from a certain time period. But one of the remarkable things about the Genji is how even 1000 years later it's still held in such high opinion.

2508:

acceptable. "anything is allowed" is only applied when they were going to the lesser people. Not to the higher, or even to the equal. Same can be said to the relation between Onna-sannomiya and Kashiwagi: then Genji was ranked as quasi-ex-Emperor-in-the-cloister, so he had no reason to allow the lesser ranked officer to have an affair with his wife.

947: 4044:

not? Was it only for that higher court world or class, and for males to be able to do? Even still would this be seen as transgressive or abusive at the time, or not? At any point during history when did that start to be the case in Japan or in the wider world, that people notice this sort of thing as wrong widely, or has it never been so?

3338:

their ideas." You might get help, you might not. As a courtesy, you can post at the discussion that you have "invited members of interested projects". For one particular obstinate member, you can post a message on an admin's talk page. He or she might have insight on the editor's behavior, or know the best course of action. Good luck.

1256:"falsehood" it deserve a mention-- if only to debunk it. For example, in an article about human ribs, it would make sense to say, "Males and females have the same number of ribs, although a common wives tale purports otherwise and assigns the difference to God's taking a rib from Adam in the Biblical story of creation." 1987:

Tyler version uses very few names in the main text; however, each chapter has a character list that mentions their titles (e.g. His Excellency), their functions (e.g. gentlewoman to Fujitsubo), and their traditional nickname (e.g. Aoi). Some of the extensive footnotes also clarify the characters' names. --

4043:

Is there any citable source, academic or otherwise that comments on the pedophilic themes in the story? The part where Genji takes a 10 year old because he's interested in her and grooms her to be his sexual partner is pretty blatant. Was that normative for the society at the time this was written or

2796:

sound like (with a link from the main Tale of Genji page)? I’d be happy to hear other suggestions (and no, cutting down the number of characters is not a solution, since I’ve noticed that most students tend to remember key names, but have troubles once they get to minor figures, so there's where they

2791:

characters and would very much benefit from some suggestions/ advice. The problem I am having is with their sheer number. Since they are so many and since each needs a comprehensive entry, the character list will end up being quite overwhelming. I have tried making short descriptions and creating new

2389:

In fact, women’s social position in the Heian period and even thereafter, into Japan’s medieval period, was not as weak as Arnold seems to think. Though it differed by region and class, in general women owned, inherited, and could pass on property separately from their husbands, for example, and they

2088:

I'm getting to think that the each chapter will eventually have to have its own page, because I was planning to have an introductory section about the chapter title, then the chapter summary, then a character list, and maybe something about the relationship with other chapters. For example, Asagao is

1986:

I bought the Seidensticker version too, so that I could compare and clarify points of confusion. In brief, the Seidensticker version seems more straightforward, while the Tyler version is more indirect. Depending on the passage, the Tyler version might be more nuanced or simply just more verbose. The

1908:

I have access to a few interesting sets of illustrations as well, but like you not a lot of free time at the moment. Might it be good enough to use a digital camera? That would save time; I'll give it a try. I didn't mean for you to go it alone though. It was more a suggestion to the community behind

1630:

Because it is an opinion, hence POV. It's also a very debatable opinion, which I think is wrong, even though Genji is a personal favourite. The best selling translation of a Japanese novel is Yoshikawa's samurai epic "Musashi". The most visible writer is Natsume Soseki because his face is on the 1000

3337:

If you are in a discussion/debate on one page that might be of interest to fellow project members, you can post a request on the project Talk page, as for example, "There is a debate on concerning stitch patterns of early Edo-period kimono (or something), and interested editors are invited to share

2580:

Shirokuma1, no ... at least now. I think I read something like I stated in books (not in papers perhaps, but it could be). Regretfully I cannot cite the source exactly. So it looks like original research, and it isn't welcome nowadays, isn't it? I admit Arnold simplified the issue too much, so it is

2286:

I have to agree with Mizi. More references are certainly needed for the article, but the current number of citation placeholders is quite excessive. The point can be made without going that far - the article looks kind of ridiculous at the moment, and it doesn't deserve that. That's not a productive

2043:

I know exactly what you mean, I was looking the other day for my old class-notes, of course I can't find them which means I would have to go again chapter through chapter. saiyaku. But your sandbox looks good, I would tweak a bit more with style etc. but I can help you with that one if you want. I'm

1934:

Someone questioned in the history whether Ivan Morris' book was influental on Japanese scholarship. No, it was influental on the Western understanding of the time period -- it was essentially the first book that provided a real look at that time period of Japan's history and culture, and it remained

1786:

OK, OK, I admit it. I hate the word "greatest" and the person who wrote the Knowledge (XXG) definition of NPOV doesn't hate it. But still, I'm right ;) (Maybe. I think. I'm sure. I think. Perhaps. Somewhat. Definitely maybe. Obviously, if you think about it. A long time. Probably. Certainly. Almost.

1766:

Seriously, how many (informed) people are there who don't believe that Genji is one of the greatest works of Japanese literature? I do think it's a good idea to qualify it with some specific quotes, for instance Yasunari Kawabata's statement in his Nobel Prize speech that "Genji in particular is the

1090:

Currently the article implies Japanese scholars dispute the term "first", but I think the main objection that Japan scholars have is with calling Genji a "novel." The novel is a Western (and quite modern) concept. It implies certain conventions and notions that just don't apply to Genji. The classic

1056:

There is a theory that suggests the "standard names" we have now for the characters were in use even during Murasaki's life. This is due to a comment in her diary that refers to Murasaki the character. However, this is not conclusive because the character is actually called "Murasaki no Ue" or "Waka

3120:

These 6 (relatively low-quality) images are all photographs of 2-D prints that are in the public domain. I am not sure about the WP copyright policy on recent (potentially copyrighted) photographs of 2-D images that themselves are public-domain, but fair-use/public-domain images definitely exist or

3075:

I removed another one that appeared to be broken, but it may be that it's just blocked on my computer or in my region or something (although I live in Japan, and my office computer is used for preparing English lessons for museum tour guides, so...). Judging by the description, however, it was only

2867:

Genji didn't just "go around doing whatever he wanted to women" as there were consequences to his actions and expectations in regards to his behavior. And it's not necessarily one of the most striking charactertics of the book - the actual stories of his affairs don't take up even half of the text.

2551:

Anyway your formulation, noblemen were "allowed to do anything toward lesser people in dignity" is better than Arnold's unqualified statement that "the customs of the time expected women to be submissive to men, even to the point of rape." How about deleting Arnold's statement and replacing it with

2547:

Aphaia, the last point you make, about Genji not feeling guilt over his affair with his stepmother (not mother-in-law) seems extraneous to this discussion, because it was a consensual affair, as i recall, and not rape. And Genji knew it was something to be concealed--shame vs. guilt I suppose. Like

2476:

Shirokuma1, I don't know Arnold and wonder who did such a generalization. In the court and noble's houses, noble men had no fear that they would be punished for rape, it was included their "noblehood". There is another Japanese researcher, whose name I don't recall for now, who pointed out rapes in

2412:

Honestly, at least for Utsusemi and Murasaki-no-ue, he raped them and so described. According to the text, both women felt uncomfortable, insulted and thought their will was ignored. But I don't think it cannot be summarized or generalized as "women's weakness". In the cultural context, Utsusemi is

1642:

However, something of that nature needs to be said even if qualified as an opinion. Currently there's nothing in the article to suggest Genji's stature in Japan -- it certainly is *one* of the pieces of literature that's commonly mentioned as Japan's greatest work of literature. It occupies a major

1568:

I definitely think there is a place for the rebuttal at the top of the article -- a number of relatively authoritative (or at least authoritative-seeming) reference works refer to Genji as the first novel, therefore we cannot simply state baldly and without qualification that Genji is not the first

3382:

It is sui generis. It is fiction, but it is not a novel. Historical fiction. A blend of genres. But the whole thing depends on how one defines a 'novel', and by any historical standards, it is a terrible anachronism (and an oversimplification) to use the term 'novel' to categorize or describe this

2436:

as they are used on Knowledge (XXG): The issue here should not be how things really were in Heian Japan, but what scholars of the era/document writing in secondary sources think, and how to present all of their thinking fairly—that means including opposing views without prejudice or bias to one or

1850:

Given that this convention does not in fact exist, and Arthur Waley's translation also "tries to be faithful to the original text" in its own way, I am removing the word "free" as it gives the misleading impression that Waley was less serious or scholarly than the next two translators. (There were

1548:. I think failing to mention anything will only further the ignorance, and even cause people to question Knowledge (XXG)'s accuracy (gyaku kōka?). Remember that an encyclopedia is basically a place to learn more about something you have heard about, often for the purpose of getting facts straight. 1421:

Okay, Vincent, you're outnumbered 2 to 1 so far. If nobody agrees with you within the next day or two, I'm going to add a more clear note stating that "while many people think Genji is the world's first novel, it really isn't" or something to that effect. If we don't explicitly debunk this, people

1244:

To call it the first novel is a POV opinion that depends on a fuzzy definition of what a novel is, and on a subjective evaluation of whether or not the Genji fits that definition. This doesn't belong in Knowledge (XXG). If it's to be written up at all, it could be placed under the heading "Reading

1188:

Exactly. When I put in the reference to it being the "first novel," I tried to make it clear that this was a disputed claim, though maybe I didn't put in enough weasel words. The point is that people who take Japanese literature classes "learn" that it is, so the article should at the least have a

3156:

make a chart, it seems relevant and acceptable to leave the link in the article. Even the "peripherally relevant" clothing website seems appropriate; if I was reading the article for the first time, I would be quite interested in how they dressed (which I was). If an active link or website can be

3028:

I am referring to the first two sentences in that section regarding Jorge Luis Borges. Is the rest of the sentence and the next one after the colon supposed to be a quote? Because as I was reading it, I was confused as it wasn't formatted as a quote since it says "I dare to recommend this book to

2894:

I came to this article as a reader of Genji looking for (references to scholarly) discussion of the role of women in the book. For instance, do scholars feel that the book is "accurate" in this regard (for nobles at that time)? I myself was stricken by how Genji (and implicitly the author) values

2375:

strength—given the context of (again) 11th century Japanese aristocracy, it was probably something else, like physical attractiveness. The whole point of the Hikaru Genji’s name was that he was supposed to have been extremely attractive and desirable, not only for his physical characteristics but

1961:

I think this is an excellent idea. My plan was always to either start a Wikiproject on the Tale of Genji, however that work would take years and I don't know if there are enough who would be willing to do it. I read the Seidensticker version, so I am curious how the Tyler version differs. I would

1572:

Perhaps I'm beating a dead horse here, but I can't help but think that, in a discussion of the world's oldest novels, that the Satyricon (attributed to Gaius Petronius) and the Chaereas and Callirhoë (attributed to Chariton) should be mentioned as they are confirmed at least by Britannica and the

1433:

Off topic, but for the record, my Japanese literature professor was Japanese. However, the first time I learned about Genji was in my Japanese Art class, taught by a white man-- in Japan. I can't honestly recall where I first heard Genji called the first novel, but it got stuck in my head at some

3821:

update: I checked the website cited, which is in Japanese. After having Chrome translate the page, I saw this: <<"Tale of Genji" in the book between 1001 - 1008 years, is the world's first long realistic novel, for the 30 million Japanese family immortal national literature, is the world's

2721:

page. I put quite some work in that entry and, to be honest, it frustrates me. The content of that entry was completely verifiable, it had several references (I was planning on adding more), so I do not see what objections could have been brought against it. If anyone has an explanation, I would

2507:

You missed the point.I didn't think you would miss the point, so for readers like you, my words should be refined "allowed to do anything toward the lesser people in dignity". As for the cases you mentiond, the Empress (Fujitsubo) was 1) in the higher rank and 2) his mother-in-law, so it was not

2496:

Aphaia, the idea stated clearly in Arnold's quote is that Heian era men could do whatever they wanted with women without fear. This gives a really distorted view of Heian Japan to any reader of this article. You have amended Arnold's nonsensical statement by saying it applies only to "noblemen."

2465:

was written, by a woman, as an entertainment rather than a sociological description, let's put this statement to the test. We know from her diary that Murasaki Shikibu was a lady in waiting on the Empress. And we know that both Murasaki and the Empress were women. Now suppose a palace guard, low

1745:

Providing an overview of the common interpretations of a creative work, preferably with citations or references to notable individuals holding that interpretation, is appropriate. For instance, that Shakespeare is one of the greatest authors of the English language is a bit of knowledge that one

1652:

How about "It is widely considered to be one of the greatest works of Japanese literature"? I think you would be hard pressed to find someone who held the honest and reasoned opinion that Genji is not *one of* the greatest works. I think that something like this needs to be said because it's not

1039:

Also the chapters are known by traditional names, but it's uncertain that these were the names Murasaki used, or even that she used any chapter names at all. I could be wrong about this last point, but it is well known that the characters in the Genji are not named. They have names of course but

3362:

Since Genji monogatari was written mainly in kana, surely the title was in kana as well. Should the original title really be displayed in kanji? Japanese Knowledge (XXG) does have the entry under modern Japanese spelling, i.e. in kanji 『源氏物語』but also adds（げんじものがたり）i.e. ge-n-ji-mo-no-go-ta-ri in

1172:

in the article. Any student of Japanese literature has heard, at some point in their life, that Genji is the world's first novel. Whether you agree with that assertion or not, it's a very common claim and it needs to be either stated or debunked so that people understand why Genji is important.

1028:

Mursaki wrote in kana because she was a woman writing for women, and Chinese characters was a masculine pursuit. While women could study them and write them, and Murasaki's calligraphy and writing were known to be particularly good, it was deemed feminine to be discreet. Murasaki criticized her

1685:

The Genji is still widely read in Japan and is one of the best known works of the period. Nearly all Japanese school children study the original, at least in part, and modern adaptations and reworkings are regularly published in a variety of media including film. The Genji first became popular

1075:

The division into 56 chapters rather than 54 is strange; I don't believe I've ever seen it divided that way before. The author of the page for some reason divided Yuugiri into two chapters, and Kumogakure was given a number (usually even when it appears in a text of the tale the chapter is not

2570:

but another subject; and (2) no other research can be found to substantiate her claim. This will require you to really hit the books and do your homework; if you’re not willing to or cannot do that (I’m willing but don’t have the time), then perhaps you shouldn’t fiddle with it. Best regards,

1511:

may not be the "first" anything, but like Shakespeare, Murasaki Shikibu borrowed and adapted what had been written before her time, but ended up writing something that transended them, and not only survived, but thrived for a millenium. Serious students of Japanese Literature might have other

2844:

If one compares male attitudes towards women in The Tale of Genji and The Heptameron, one will see little difference regarding their views of female inferiority and subjectivity to males. The primary difference exists in how the females themselves comprehend their roles in society. Women in

3000:, we should be citing one or the other as the author. (There is a case to be made for the translator-as-author if the article is referring specifically to an aspect of or note in his translation, but if so "Lady Murasaki" should probably be in the book title, not listed as a "co-author".) 2144:, some stuff obviously still missing. Maybe for each chapter there can be a "Genji" template at the bottom or on the side, sort of like a "ring" system where one can click and jump to each chapter. We could use some nice Heian-jidai graphic or image in small size to add to that template. 2359:

The two paragraphs about Hikaru Genji’s exploits with women, describing how he “raped” them and discussing how women in medieval Japan were helpless against male dominance prevents several problems, aside from the absence of anything to balance its judgmental and POV nature of applying

2199:

I've added the Novels WikiProject template to this talk page in an attempt to draw interest in expanding this article. At the same time, I don't believe that the format proposed by that WikiProject quite fits the Tale of Genji, because the work doesn't revolve around a simple A-:

2868:

Also, this article isn't about women's place in society at that time. You could add a section on historical context, but that seems like more of an undertaking than what would be appropriate for an article about Genji. If you do, however, create a section on the role of women, I

2762:

changed it to a redirect for his specified reason. If you disagree, then please take it up with him. No Knowledge (XXG) work is ever really gone so please relax. You may click on any of this past versions in the history and revert to that previous version upon coming to a

1631:

yen bill. More people today write quick personal essays following Sei Shonagon's style, while few write romantic large scale psychological novels. Japanese lit is a rich field and it's a disservice to stick a simplistic superlative label on any one work on any one author.

1746:

should learn from an encyclopedia. Notice, determining how some artist or work has been received publicly or critically might require research; but that reception, unlike the idiosyncratic opinion of the Knowledge (XXG) article writer, is an opinion that really matters.

2401:

Even assuming that these statements do tell us something about the article’s subject, they should be presented in a separate section—one on the significance and implications of the work—rather than in a section describing or summarizing the narrative. Best regards,

2895:

women for (among other things) their intellectual and artistic accomplishments, but still does not feel he has to keep his word to them ("I promise I'll behave myself", followed by what may be rape, in chapter 6, for instance). So I'd welcome a section like this.

2680:

Why does this article have no mention to medieval readership in Japan? (In japan alone, since there was no translation into any language). Sources say it had a enthusiastic readership both in girls and high literate people (I forgot the name, but a some critic -

2444:, and it appears that an earlier editor inserted her views to push a POV that is basically irrelevant to the article (if the article were on women’s issues in ancient Japan, I’d have nothing to object to), taking them out of their original context. Best regards, 1044:

society deemed it impolite to actually use them. This practice survives today: the emperor is never ever referred to by name (Akihito) nor will he ever. After he passes away, he will be known as the Heisei emperor, as Hirohito is known as the Showa emperor.

2513:

Also as self-conscious of Genji, I would point out Genji was not described to feel guilty for his relation to the Empress & mother-in-law. It could suggest Murasaki shikibu portrated her hero not feeling guilty. It accords his statement to Utsusemi in

1569:

novel. But we shouldn't say that it *is* the first novel either since not everyone agrees with that. I think the best way is to simply state the facts -- that while it is sometimes referred to as the first novel, not everyone agrees with that description.

1014:

Good point. The original book was in kana with an occasional chinese character, kanjis came later. What is the source of the kanjis? I think they should be last, not first. They are interesting, but most people can't read them. Asereje 02:38, 18 Jul 2004

1033:

on showing off her ability to write Chinese, calling her Chinese poems "garish" or something like that. Jealousy, one wonders. The The earliest known manuscripts for the Genji date from 400 years after Murasaki's death, and would most likely use Chinese

2485:

is based on their socially acceped wisdom "nobles are allowed to do anything - even rapes"; as long as we limit the topic for our protagonists, I think Mary Arnord rightly points out that element. It doesn't mean it is the message of this work, though.

1943:

Hi, I'm currently reading The Tale of Genji, and it occurred to me that a separate chapter summary page would be a good idea. I'd do it myself, but I've never read the book before, and I'm only up to chapter 8 right now in the Royall Tyler translation.

1023:

No surviving manuscript of the Tale of Genji is written in "all kana", and I think this is more of a legend than actual fact, especially since one of the few things we know about Murasaki Shikibu is that she knew Chinese characters well. (-Chris Kern)

3056:, two-page, copyrighted table (with permission of the creator, of course). I will post the link here, so that we can use it to create our own (not just copy the image) and include it in the article. We can cite the web-page as the source. The link is 1947:

What are your thoughts on this? Would it be better to make separate pages for each chapter, or make one long page with sections? I personally think that separate pages would be better, from the standpoint of trying to limit the size of each article.

1918:

That would be fantastic! I'm new to wikipedia (only a few weeks old but I'm starting to get well into it). I dont have a prob with scanning the 52 images from the Burke Album but like I said a) it could take me a few weeks and b) not sure about the

2367:

Further, since the norm in that period of Japan’s history among the aristocracy (at least) was for relationships to be initiated and carried on in this way, and relationships were often not monogamous, there is little reason assume that this was a

2326:

The webpage is reliable but the oldest surviving copy is only mentioned as an aside in a news blurb about a newer manuscript. I have looked on the internet for a better source but I can't seem to find anything at all. I'd appreciate some help. -

2943:

How were the earliest copies reproduced? The article has an image of a manuscript , but were all copies originally made by scribes or did the Japanese have some form or early printing available? When were the first printed copies made in Japan?

2851:

I don't get much of this from the WP article. Didn't Genji go around doing whatever he wanted to women, and isn't that the most striking characteristic of the book? Why are we spending so much time saying it's a classic and doesn't have a plot?

2250:

It's a good thought but you may have gone overboard on the citation placeholders. I don't think inline citations on that magnitude are necessary for a good article. There are several different types of referencing that Knowledge (XXG) accepts.

1240:

first published heaven knows when, probably in a 19th century memoir of Japan, and has been parrotted ever since, the same way biology textbooks always mention Lamarck when they introduce Darwin even though it's a now anachronistic and useless

2423:

This page—and much less so the article—is not the place to be editorializing about what may or may not have been, but rather a place for discussing and reaching consensus on how the article should be written. For that to happen, understanding

2396:

These weaknesses need to be balanced or removed. They could even be seen as off-topic for the article, given that they seem more designed to present the Japanese in an unfavorable light with respect to women rather than tell us anything about

1108:

I'm sure more knowledgeable people have more nuanced things to say about this, but while I think it's okay to CALL it a novel for lack of a better word, I believe it is important to caution the reader the problems with this. -- Dec 7, 04 Alex

1373:

Murasaki was neither the first or the last writer of the Heian period, nor was the Genji the earliest example of a "monogatari". Rather, the Genji stands above other tales of the time much as Shakespeare's plays stand above other Elizabethan

3279:

who has been adding promotional links to unreliable/non-learned websites on various articles on Japanese poetry and painting, and when I tried to explain to said user politely that ELs should be kept to a minimum, and the standard was that

1281:: "There is a legend that male humans have one rib fewer than female humans. This is false, and originates from the Bible's description of the creation of Eve (from the rib of Adam." Go, theoretical examples that turn out to be true. :) )-- 3430:

I read a great novel a few years ago, can't remember by whom. Called the Tale of Murasaki, and set around the life of the author of Genji. Just popping it here in case an editor would like to source and include it. I don't have time now.

1543:

only know about because it is widely called the first novel. From the first time I heard that claim I thought it sounded suspicious, but it has definitely become "common knowledge". I wasn't aware that there was any scholarly controversy

2970:

The earliest versions were made by calligraphers employed by the royal court. Tons of research needed here and I'm not quite sure when the first printed copies were made or even whether they still exist. There are very early scrolls -

1899:

Well, there are several works containing illustrations based on The Tale of Genji, I just happen to have the print of one from the 17th century known as the Burke Album. I could scan all the images (which is going to take some time).

1890:

I like your added illustrations. I changed the caption format though. For additional illustration it would be nice to link to a wikisource page of all the illustrations we can muster. I think this is worth the time and server space.

1668:

we're reading the Genji 1000 years after it was written. Although, I would get rit of both "It is considered" and "the greatest". The latter is POV and the former is only pseudo-NPOV. I'd go more for something like this under "Genji

3405:

It's clearly cited that this has been considered a novel by many sources. It is a simplification to use the term 'novel' for anything, but that's a good thing; simplification into large groups is how humans understand the world. As

2341:

As for the structure, is there any good reason not to mention the two series theory proposed by 武田宗俊 (Munetoshi Takeda?), based on statistical analysis? His theory is very known in Japan and widely accepted by the academics in this

1767:

highest pinnacle of Japanese literature. Even down to our day there has not been a piece of fiction to compare with it.", or Fujiwara no Shunzei's statement that study of it was indispensable for anyone who wanted to compose poetry.

1019:

Kanji came first, then kana developed from them. The script in use at the time of Genji's writing was sort of an amalgam -- multiple kanji simplifications were used for each kana (some of which are nearly identical to modern kana).

4070:. " as the middle-aged pervert Genji buys a young girl (the character known as Murasaki) and then raises her to be his perfect sexual companion: a situation Lady Murasaki treats as brutally and insightfully as Nabokov himself;" 2268:

Maybe so, but each of those points was something that I read, and wanted to know more about. They're all things that a person could be curious about. Even if we just cited the major translations, then that'd be something. -

1877:

Hello everyone, I have added some illustrations from the Burke albuns. Please let me know if you think some more illustrations can be added or not, or maybe we can try to look for other styles (earlier period and closer to

2995:

Does anyone know why the references for this article mention "Shikibu, Murasaki" and Waley as the authors? Let alone that the article probably should use one of the more up-to-date/scholarly/accurate translations of the

2458:"Mary Arnold points out that, '...The customs of the time expected women to be submissive to men, even to the point of rape. Men had no fear that they would be punished for rape, as evidenced in Genji's attitude.'" 2693:

had fallen into the Hell due to her writing. I think it should be mention as a part of Genji reception, but the current structure seems to lack interest to this aspect. Is there any consensus about this topic?

2056:... very confusing to those who might not be familiar, so we should work on that as well. I don't have much time for this project here unfortunately, but I'll keep an eye open and try to come back to it later. 2609:

Prince Niou ("Prince Niou Genji" is an impossibility; "Genji" specifically indicates a person who was removed from the imperial succession and made a commoner, which does not apply to Niou.) "Kaoru Genji" -:

2385:

It is debatable whether Genji’s actions typify the impunity of men committing rape at that time, because it is unlikely that his actions were contemporarily perceived of as rape, even if they were by today’s

3259:

section of this article. A link to a single IMDb page just seems inappropriate for an article on a 1,000-old-book. I can understand your argument that it is the first/best/best-known of the adaptations, but

2548:

in the "Yugao" chapter he wears a mask when visiting the girl--these noblemen maybe didn't feel guilt over what they were doing, but they recognized society would sanction them over inappropraite behavior.

4090:

Apropos the clarification request following "The translation omits the 38th chapter completely", I found at least one mention of it in a review (Mills, D. E. Modern Asian Studies 12, no. 4 (1978): 679–84.

626: 2623:

One of the frequent arguments made against the multiple authorship idea is that the Genji is a work of such genius that someone of equal or greater genius taking over after Murasaki is implausible.

1847:

I don't know the convention, but if this is the case, someone should wikify the word "free" to point to the definition of "Free Translation" on Knowledge (XXG) if it's there, or Wiktionary if not.

1266:

You yourself admit that a number of Japanese professors continue to parrot some old 19th century book about "Genji" being the first novel. So why not stop the parroting by letting people know that

2651:

It needs a source; I don't think the content should be completely expunged from the article because it *is* an argument made in favor of single authorship. But without a source it looks like POV.

2212:

While an infobox as proposed by the Novels WP would be useful, I don't want to be the one to add it and thereby disrupt the current look of the page through my inexperience with wiki software. --

1851:

certainly differences in the approaches to translation, and it would be good to tease them out using actual sources, but simply calling Waley's "free" is vague to the point of being misleading.)

2236:

Please don't be upset that I've tagged a lot of things in the article as needing a citation - I was really impressed by the article, but if we want to get it to Good Article, (which is the

3410:

makes it clear, the word "novel" is frequently extended to works far older than The Tale of Genji. The first "x" can always be argued to be an anachronism, but there must be a first "x".--

1626:

Why was my statement in the beginning edited out? The Tale of Genji *is* widely considered to be the greatest work of Japanese literature. Not universally, but it's a widely held opinion.

3231:

someone has re-created the chart, or uploaded and included photos of period dress, I think both links are relevant, appropriate, and lend additional necessary information to the article.

2343: 2301:

I've replaced the fact tags with a single not verified tag at the top of the page, and cited the differing manga translations of the Genji. Hope this is more to everyone's satisfaction. -

859: 1217:

3. It might not even be the most influential work of Japanese lit, e.g. few roman-fleuve are published today but thousands of Pillow-Book type essays are published each month in Japan.

1079:

Perhaps someone should also give the "official" translations of the chapter titles used by Waley, Seidensticker, and Tyler. (The translations appearing in the article are rather odd.)

3048:

I have removed two ELs from this page. One was an IMDb page for one of the many film/TV adaptations of this work, with no indication why it is relevant. The other was in violation of

1844:

Free is the right word in this case because a "free translation" is one that puts the emphasis on readability and understanding rather than literalness. ] 14:24, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

215: 74: 4183: 3313:

or some such, but it has been very difficult to convince the general Knowledge (XXG) community when my arguments by necessity are rooted in the study of Japanese literature...)

1977:

I'm really wishing right now that I had taken notes when I had first started to read The Tale of Genji. That would have made both reading and writing about it that much easier.

616: 4138: 4021: 925: 363: 4238: 3988: 4188: 915: 3919: 3915: 3901: 3696: 3692: 3678: 3532: 3528: 3514: 3309:(By the way, is there any way I can request comment specifically from WikiProject:Japan members on that user's behaviour? I understand that such would probably violate 2044:

also thinking about setting up a table to show how the character's names are different in the Japanese original, Seidensticker version, etc.... for example it's either

820: 592: 233: 78: 4248: 2155:

That's seven colons now. I imagine that you're talking about a chapter box much like the United States National Parks box that appears at the bottom of (for example)

3076:

peripherally relevant to this article to begin with. If it seems appropriate to anyone who can actually access the page, the link may be re-added to the articles on

3644: 731: 371: 4218: 4153: 810: 187: 891: 4178: 292: 4233: 2689:

in the Edo period. On the other hand, in counterpart of those enthusiasm, there was also accusation againt its "immorality" and "eroticism". It was even said

4243: 4198: 2140:

Take your time, no rush. I think as well each chapter will have to be separate, on top of that each character could have their own article, I once wrote the

721: 4128: 4123: 3109: 1552:

to discount common misconceptions, I think. Sometimes we get so consumed with being right that they forget why these articles are here in the first place. (

581: 558: 4228: 2975:

that had painted illustrations matched to the text. The image here is from the 13th century. I believe these were made of silk - but not entirely certain.

1795:

is factual and refers to a fact (we can measure the Genji's impact on Jpn lit) while "considered one of the greatest" is factual but refers to an opinion (

2240:

it deserves) then we do need inline citations. I'm not a Genji buff, so I'll have to rely on all of youse to help find appropriate citations. Thanks :) -

786: 4208: 409: 3482: 535: 284: 3052:

in that it did not provide a unique resource beyond what this article would provide if it was of FA-quality. It contained an online reproduction of a

2820: 882: 843: 1444:

re: "It might not even be the most influential work of Japanese lit": For just one measure of the influence, look at the number of film adaptations:

697: 197: 2717:

characters some time ago and everything seemed to go just fine, when, without any warning, the link to my Utsusemi entry was redirected to the main

3620: 322: 315: 35: 4213: 4148: 4143: 4133: 3492: 1539:

This issue seems to have been settled but I want to throw in my opinion as an amateur observer. I and all non-literature majors who have heard of

1532:

by calling it the "first novel", but since this misconception is so widespread, it is best to deal with it quickly and at the top of the article.

2382:

The Tale of Genji takes place in the 11th century or earlier; that is not “medieval Japan”—she’s off by two or three hundred years at the least.

1909:

this article that a wikisource entry with illustrations from this would be a good project. We could coordinate with japanese WP too I'm sure. --

4168: 525: 3210:(The chart and clothing are 2 things that could very easily be added to the article itself, and so they were among the first links I removed. 998:

Can someone fill in the three gradual stages part? There are only two listed and they only cover 54 chapters, while 56 are listed just below.

777: 754: 4193: 1951:

I would be glad to contribute towards this, but it'll just take time. I find that reading Genji takes more effort than the average novel. --

388: 342: 329: 4173: 3390: 2658: 2634: 688: 649: 500: 498:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the

3148:

I don't see why these were removed. With the exception of the third dead link (on clothing), they all seem relevant and appropriate. One

4223: 4158: 3768: 3432: 1587: 138: 130: 4051: 3253:. If it is notable, a separate article on the film itself should be created, with a link to said Knowledge (XXG) article added to the 2168:

Exactly, something along those lines. Well I think we should focus on the chapters first, then worry about templates and stuff later.

1858: 397: 4203: 3897:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

3638: 1259:

Do men and women have a different number of ribs? Hell no! Do a lot of people think they do? Sadly, yes. Is it worth mentioning,

3645:

https://web.archive.org/web/20081217181540/http://instruct1.cit.cornell.edu:80/courses/asian377/studentspring99/asian377e/genji/

4163: 4118: 2008:. I don't know whether to "go live" and just start the actual chapter summary page, or leave it in my sandbox for further work. 1577: 1528:

that they know about. It is a shame that somewhere down the line someone felt that they needed to embellish the reputation of

478: 439: 44: 3877: 890:

and related articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1214:

2. Japanese people don't even call it a novel (shosetsu) they call it a monogatari (a tale) and it isn't the first of those.

142: 134: 118: 69: 4014: 2958: 664: 643: 3981: 1120: 4029: 3996: 3962: 3739: 2581:

okay with me to have it gone per se, but I would be more than happy to see mention to feminism criticism standpoints.--

2364:

First, it is not even clear from the original Japanese text that Genji entered the woman’s room without her permission.

2917: 2738: 2322:

I'm a little bit concerned because I don't think my source for the historical copies section is entirely appropriate.

3648: 3483:

http://web.archive.org/web/20090802081528/http://sankei.jp.msn.com:80/culture/academic/081029/acd0810292235011-n1.htm

3127:

section of this article. I doubt they are really relevant, though, since the much more notable and accurate/relevant

1126: 2131:

As I said before, I'm trying to spend more time reading the book than thinking about the chapter summary project. --

2021:

One problem is that working on the chapter summaries takes away time from actually reading the book, and vice versa.

4067: 3887: 3249:

Wait, I missed your comment on the movie: the movie is one of a large number of film and television adaptations of

1836:

I added two sections on debates of authorship and completeness, and I also revised the Uji section of the summary.

769: 748: 206: 3918:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

3767:

It's virtually unreadable in its present form. I would try and clean it up but I can't make enough sense of it.

3695:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

3621:

https://web.archive.org/web/20090426003611/http://metropolis.co.jp:80/biginjapanarchive349/324/biginjapaninc.htm

3531:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

858: 837: 3837: 3805: 3493:

http://web.archive.org/web/20090108132727/http://mainichi.jp:80/select/wadai/news/20081030k0000m040085000c.html

3306:

also have far too many links. I then had little choice but to move over here and attempt to clean up the links.

3034: 2662: 1154: 347: 3394: 2638: 50: 4010:

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

3977:

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

3824:

So, the source isn't usable either, unless we get a good translator. Best to leave the passage off the page.

3772: 3436: 1316:

be mentioned at all, it should not be given the prominence it gets when placed in the introductory paragraph.

4055: 4025: 3992: 3953: 3869: 3730: 3600: 3486: 3320: 3215: 3201: 3136: 3097: 3065: 3014: 2980: 2360:

19–20th-century moral ideas to 11th century Japan (and attitude usually construed as cultural imperialism):

2206: 2005: 1862: 1591: 1555: 224: 4047: 3386: 2726: 2654: 2630: 2611:

Kaoru (As above -- Kaoru was never in the imperial line, so it would be impossible for him to be a Genji.)

1854: 1664:

Then put under the heading "Reading the Genji today", at the beginning perhaps. It would certainly explain

1583: 1095:

1) in Genji the protagonist dies in the middle of the book (that's if you agree Genji is the "protagonist")

1063:

Commenting on the above discussion made me read the article over again. It was in need of a major rewrite.

3865: 2713:

I am more than a little confused about what happened to my entry on "Utsusemi." I have started working on

2156: 2067:

The stuff in my sandbox is merely an attempt to get something down in text, nothing like a finished piece.

3614: 3275:

Also, I apologize for my harshness in deleting these links. I was recently directed to this article by a

1505:, "...it would not be possible to list all the other works of Japanese literature that it has inspired." 3937:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

3925: 3714:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

3702: 3570: 3550:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

3538: 3018: 1787:

Unless I'm wrong, which I doubt. Most of the time, anyway.) So how about in the intro paragraph, adding

1153:

Sorry, my mistake. We had a discussion of the Genji-is-1st-novel theory elsewhere, not here. Please see

785:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

782: 696:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

591:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

3868:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 3599:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2685:? - said any waka creator should read Genji or like that). And we must not miss mention and revival by 3608: 3057: 1208:

False claims do not need to be mentioned. To summarize the long argument in Talk:Japanese Literature:

1082:

Speaking of that, I guess there should be a section on the English translations as well. - Chris Kern

3669: 3624: 3496: 3415: 3368: 3364: 3343: 3236: 3162: 2594: 2553: 2498: 2467: 379: 4100: 4075: 3265: 2213: 2160: 2132: 2035: 1988: 1952: 1495: 1104:

4) in Genji poetry and prose are perfectly fused, and it was first read mainly for its poetry really

21: 3825: 3793: 3407: 3121:

could be produced. Therefore, if it were really necessary, we could incorporate them into, say, an

3030: 2828: 1611: 1525: 984: 587: 573: 552: 146: 1211:

1. Genji isn't the world's first novel the same way Shakespeare isn't the first English playright;

1112:

I reverted the deletion of the claim that many consider Genji to be the world's first novel. This

3632: 3316: 3211: 3197: 3132: 3093: 3061: 3010: 2976: 2929: 2881: 2314: 2288: 1138: 680: 355: 4104: 3922:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

3699:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

3535:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

3261: 3184:(on the Talk page) so that relevant material can be incorporated in the article, but ELs in the 3177: 2816: 2323: 2089:

introduced pretty early on, and then she isn't mentioned for a while, and then she pops back up.

1101:

3) it was also read mainly by arisocrats, whereas the Western novel emerged as a popular artform

4096: 4071: 3938: 3715: 3551: 1935:

so for a long time. It's still considered a classic work of English language Japanese history.

1312:

professors, often white people who haven't been to Japan and speak no Japanese. If a falsehood

1189:

link to some where that people can here why it is or isn't considered to be the first novel. --

3861: 3639:

http://www.lamarre-mediaken.com/Site/EAST_305_files/Midorikawa%20Translations%20of%20Genji.pdf

3592: 3464: 3454: 3303: 3254: 3123: 3084: 2857: 2772: 2759: 2379:

Mary Arnold’s statement about women in medieval Japan in problematic for three major reasons:

1041: 983:

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |

3310: 3269: 3173: 3049: 2748: 2433: 1725:

Your definition of NPOV doesn't agree with Knowledge (XXG)'s, to quote from the NPOV article:

3566: 2949: 2900: 2699: 2690: 2686: 2682: 1962:

like a chapter summary, don't have much time at the moment, but this would be a great idea.

1879: 1574: 1501:? None that I could find. But those are just modern examples. As Donald Keene put it in his 1007: 959: 887: 3945: 3722: 3558: 3276: 3176:(particularly point 1) for my justification for most of these removals. They also all fail 2764: 2563: 2532: 2429: 1578:

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/454501/Gaius-Petronius-Arbiter/5644/The-Satyricon

3878:

https://web.archive.org/web/20160216011506/http://webworld.unesco.org/genji/en/index.shtml

3472: 3411: 3339: 3232: 3196:

containing too much/detailed information to incorporate directly into the article itself.

3158: 2872:

recommend citing scholarly journals strictly dealing with The Tale of Genji and its time (

2846: 2805: 2734: 2572: 2536: 2445: 2403: 2169: 2145: 2057: 1963: 693: 674: 4066:

You might be interested in this article, it is a wordpress blog though from an academic:

2425: 1820:

Anyway, I'm taking this entry off my watchlist. I need a rest from it. Have fun. Cheers.

1595: 1563: 94: 63: 3904:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 3681:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 3517:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2824: 2328: 2302: 2270: 2256: 2241: 1924: 1910: 1901: 1892: 1883: 1607: 1520:), but for the average Literature student, or even just the average person in general, 874: 275: 3944:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

3911: 3786:

was written between 1001 and 1008. It is an example of the Japanese literary genre of

3721:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

3688: 3557:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

3524: 3227:

I understand your wikipedia rationale, I disagree with the subjective severity. Also,

1132: 4112: 4006:

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

3973:

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

2925: 2877: 972: 470: 2481:. Other major rape in the story made by Niounomiya, a grandson of Genji and prince. 2110:

I like your idea about a table (a concordance?) that shows the differences in names.

3115:

University of Alberta Art& Artifact Collection. Utagawa Kunisada II Collection.

3078: 2853: 2768: 2141: 1687: 1423: 1402:

I think I wrote that a couple of months of ago when I reworked the article. Cheers

1174: 1146: 1030: 150: 110: 3881: 3649:

http://instruct1.cit.cornell.edu/courses/asian377/studentspring99/asian377e/genji/

3172:

ELs should generally be kept to a minimum in Knowledge (XXG) articles. Please see

3292:

provide a unique resource, it should not be added in the first place, he made an

4068:

https://mairangibay.blogspot.com/2013/10/the-true-story-of-novel-3-japanese.html

3888:

https://web.archive.org/web/20160306112136/http://isekatagami.com/en.genjil.html

2945: 2896: 2695: 2582: 2519: 2487: 2414: 2346: 1560: 1435: 1282: 1271: 1190: 495: 1139:

Encarta doesn't pass judgment but does note that it "has been called" the first

1006:

If the book was written in kana, why are kanji used in the chapter headings? -

3910:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 3687:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 3523:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2801: 2730: 2252: 1821: 1707: 1632: 1403: 1246: 1158: 1064: 1046: 864: 670: 464: 460: 454: 433: 100: 3891: 2972: 1603: 1481: 1473: 1469: 1236:

That your Japanese lit teachers said it was so doesn't make it so. It is an

4079: 4059: 4033: 4000: 3967: 3844: 3812: 3776: 3760: 3744: 3578: 3440: 3419: 3398: 3372: 3347: 3324: 3240: 3219: 3205: 3166: 3140: 3101: 3069: 3038: 2984: 2953: 2933: 2904: 2885: 2861: 2832: 2809: 2776: 2703: 2666: 2642: 2597: 2585: 2575: 2556: 2539: 2522: 2501: 2490: 2470: 2448: 2417: 2406: 2349: 2331: 2317: 2305: 2291: 2273: 2259: 2244: 2216: 2174: 2163: 2150: 2135: 2062: 2038: 1991: 1968: 1955: 1866: 1615: 2371:

Genji’s “power” that motivated the women to acquiesce was not necessarily

1690:'s translation of the 1920's and has been translated several times since. 3487:

http://sankei.jp.msn.com/culture/academic/081029/acd0810292235011-n1.htm

3469:

after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add

2593:

Okay, Arnold's comment is gone, for reasons cited in the above posting.

2311: 1533: 1341:

I read the article again and you'll find that the first novel argument

967:

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

491: 487: 3615:

http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/national/culture/news/20080310-OYT1T00698.htm

1789:... and is one of the most important works within Japanese literature. 1602:

If this 11th century work is the world's first novel, then what about

4092: 3759:

Book.douban.com. (2017). The tale of Genji (Douban). Available at:

3152:

make a chart like the one depicted in a link, but until some editor

2432:

and work from there to familiarize yourselves with concepts such as

1461: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1116:

a widely-held belief and it shouldn't be expunged from the article.

2428:

is prerequisite; I’d like to suggest that the two of you check out

1476:. How many movies did I find with any connection to Sei Shōnagon's 3625:

http://metropolis.co.jp/biginjapanarchive349/324/biginjapaninc.htm

3609:

http://sankei.jp.msn.com/life/trend/080310/trd0803102145019-n1.htm

3497:

http://mainichi.jp/select/wadai/news/20081030k0000m040085000c.html

3477:

to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

3298: 2957: 2916: 2608:

I changed a few names on the name list: "Prince Niou Genji" -: -->

1487: 1465: 1457: 976: 483: 124: 3089: 2876:

16th century France) instead of using the source you cited here.

1133:

Web-japan.org, although admittedly not a neutral source, concurs

1121:

Publishers Weekly and Amazon both claim that Genji is the first

2205:

I'm slowly working on a chapter summary page, currently in my

1278: 941: 15: 2355:

Tag section for POV because of strongly judgmental statements

2324:

http://www.f.waseda.jp/mjewel/jlit/archives/archives2001.html

1345:

mentioned under the "Literary context" heading, at the end. :

1098:

2) it's extremely episodic; there isn't a clear narrative arc

3654:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the

3502:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the

3188:

section should generally be restricted to materials dealing

482:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to 274: 223: 205: 2004:

I've done some preliminary work on a chapter summary in my

1145:

So if it ain't true, it needs to be explained, at least. -

3872:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

3603:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

2440:

Arnold is not an expert on Japan, Japanese literature, or

2345:, so I suppose you have a good reference to in English. -- 3180:

for the reasons stated above. I have preserved the links

1575:

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/106512/Chariton

402: 3358:

Kanji/Chinese characters in original title. Or hiragana.

585:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 3596: 3458: 3453:

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on

2755: 268: 263: 258: 253: 158: 3363:

hiragana. At least we should also add the hiragana. --

3378:

It is a ridiculous anachronism to call this a "novel"

2159:. I don't yet know how to make anything like that. -- 2255:

I do agree that the references section is lacking. -

886:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 781:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 692:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 375:: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions. 145:. Current time in Japan: 23:26, September 19, 2024 ( 122:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 3914:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 3691:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 3527:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2627:Should probably be changed, for obvious reasons. 1556:Incandescent light bulb#History of the light bulb 137:, where you can join the project, participate in 2253:http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Citing_sources 1546:until I read the first paragraph of this article 3882:http://webworld.unesco.org/genji/en/index.shtml 1454:Genji monogatari (1966) aka "The Tale of Genji" 1446:Genji monogatari (1951) aka "The Tale of Genji" 601:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Library of Congress 4139:Knowledge (XXG) level-4 vital articles in Arts 4020:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 3987:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 3900:This message was posted before February 2018. 3677:This message was posted before February 2018. 3513:This message was posted before February 2018. 1470:Sennen no koi - Hikaru Genji monogatari (2002) 3284:the article were of featured-article quality 3024:Beginning Sentences in "Reception and legacy" 3007:is not her last name. We should change this. 2991:Murasaki Shikibu's name in the reference list 8: 3131:is already heavily featured in the article. 4184:Low-importance Library of Congress articles 900:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Women's History 4045: 3892:http://www.isekatagami.com/en.genjil.html/ 3384: 3272:all seem to be pretty clear on this issue. 2990: 1939:how about a separate chapter summary page? 1923:status. Also... how does wikisource work? 832: 743: 638: 547: 428: 241: 58: 3860:I have just modified 2 external links on 3591:I have just modified 4 external links on 2821:List of characters from The Tale of Genji 2426:Knowledge (XXG)’s objectives and policies 1462:Murasaki Shikibu: Genji monogatari (1987) 795:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Women writers 129:on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to 4189:WikiProject Library of Congress articles 3761:https://book.douban.com/subject/1006113/ 2722:truly appreciate some feedback. Thanks. 2461:Okay, aside from the obvious point that 1512:favorites (for example, Ihara Saikaku's 604:Template:WikiProject Library of Congress 4239:Mid-importance Women's History articles 834: 745: 706:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Middle Ages 640: 549: 504:to talk over new ideas and suggestions. 430: 159: 60: 19: 4129:Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in Arts 4124:Knowledge (XXG) level-4 vital articles 2787:I am currently working on the list of 2758:for Utsusemi. There you may find that 1606:, the seventh century Sanskrit novel? 4219:Top-importance Women writers articles 4154:Top-importance Japan-related articles 3666:to let others know (documentation at 1622:Greatest work of Japanese literature? 7: 4249:WikiProject Women's History articles 4179:B-Class Library of Congress articles 2287:strategy for improving the article. 903:Template:WikiProject Women's History 880:This article is within the scope of 775:This article is within the scope of 686:This article is within the scope of 579:This article is within the scope of 476:This article is within the scope of 116:This article is within the scope of 4244:All WikiProject Women-related pages 4199:Low-importance Middle Ages articles 2376:also for his empathy towards women. 49:It is of interest to the following 4229:WikiProject Women writers articles 4093:http://www.jstor.org/stable/312374 4085: 2313:might be handy for source-mining. 1157:for why it isn't the first novel. 798:Template:WikiProject Women writers 510:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Novels 14: 4209:All WikiProject Middle Ages pages 3864:. Please take a moment to review 3754:I removed the following section: 3595:. Please take a moment to review 3457:. Please take a moment to review 3192:with the subject of this article 2754:Secondly, I suggest checking the 1127:Britannica claims that it's first 232:This article is supported by the 214:This article is supported by the 172:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Japan 4234:B-Class Women's History articles 4039:Comment on the Pedophilic Themes 1168:This still needs to be at least 945: 867: 857: 836: 768: 747: 709:Template:WikiProject Middle Ages 673: 663: 642: 572: 551: 463: 453: 432: 103: 93: 62: 29: 20: 3613:Corrected formatting/usage for 3607:Corrected formatting/usage for 2518:which I quoted on the above. -- 920:This article has been rated as 815:This article has been rated as 726:This article has been rated as 621:This article has been rated as 582:WikiProject Library of Congress 530:This article has been rated as 192:This article has been rated as 4214:B-Class Women writers articles 4149:B-Class Japan-related articles 4144:B-Class vital articles in Arts 4134:B-Class level-4 vital articles 3745:09:22, 14 September 2016 (UTC) 3399:01:10, 21 September 2015 (UTC) 3110:Kunisada II- Illustrations of 2704:09:09, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 2598:12:01, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 2586:07:18, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 2576:13:28, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 2557:11:03, 13 September 2007 (UTC) 2540:11:56, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2523:11:01, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2502:11:28, 11 September 2007 (UTC) 2491:09:26, 10 September 2007 (UTC) 2471:05:08, 10 September 2007 (UTC) 2449:11:56, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 2034:Let me know what you think. -- 1497:. The number of manga for the 975:links to a specific web page: 1: 4169:Top-importance novel articles 4060:21:42, 4 September 2023 (UTC) 4034:14:13, 15 December 2020 (UTC) 3579:23:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC) 3348:07:29, 16 November 2012 (UTC) 3325:01:10, 16 November 2012 (UTC) 3256:Film and operatic adaptations 3241:20:27, 15 November 2012 (UTC) 3220:16:41, 15 November 2012 (UTC) 3206:16:39, 15 November 2012 (UTC) 3167:10:47, 15 November 2012 (UTC) 3141:04:55, 15 November 2012 (UTC) 3102:04:25, 15 November 2012 (UTC) 3070:11:14, 14 November 2012 (UTC) 2954:12:16, 28 February 2012 (UTC) 2939:Reproduction , some questions 2862:18:50, 24 February 2009 (UTC) 2833:20:53, 28 November 2008 (UTC) 2810:06:16, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 2667:15:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 2332:19:50, 17 November 2006 (UTC) 2318:07:06, 17 November 2006 (UTC) 2306:23:30, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 2292:17:10, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 2274:07:23, 15 November 2006 (UTC) 2260:19:54, 13 November 2006 (UTC) 1867:01:35, 24 February 2012 (UTC) 1057:Murasaki" in the tale itself. 894:and see a list of open tasks. 789:and see a list of open tasks. 700:and see a list of open tasks. 595:and see a list of open tasks. 245:WikiProject Japan to do list: 4194:B-Class Middle Ages articles 4001:11:48, 9 December 2020 (UTC) 3968:19:20, 6 December 2017 (UTC) 3441:00:02, 13 January 2016 (UTC) 3088:, for instance. The link is 3039:12:00, 10 October 2012 (UTC) 2934:07:52, 23 October 2010 (UTC) 2777:05:17, 31 October 2008 (UTC) 2643:16:37, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 2562:Here’s why not: It would be 2245:11:13, 8 November 2006 (UTC) 2195:Genji and Novels WikiProject 2052:(capitalised can change) or 1616:11:42, 3 February 2015 (UTC) 1596:05:31, 28 October 2011 (UTC) 1450:Shin Genji monogatari (1961) 1252:I disagree. Since this is a 607:Library of Congress articles 4174:WikiProject Novels articles 3019:05:59, 1 October 2012 (UTC) 2886:03:54, 2 January 2010 (UTC) 2418:10:43, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 1564:05:17, 7 October 2005 (UTC) 1085: 883:WikiProject Women's History 513:Template:WikiProject Novels 367:to articles that need them. 306:Featured content candidates 4265: 4224:WikiProject Women articles 4159:WikiProject Japan articles 4086:Waley's omission of ch. 38 3931:(last update: 5 June 2024) 3857:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 3845:20:06, 19 March 2017 (UTC) 3813:20:02, 19 March 2017 (UTC) 3777:04:58, 19 March 2017 (UTC) 3708:(last update: 5 June 2024) 3588:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 3544:(last update: 5 June 2024) 3475:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} 3450:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 3420:00:26, 20 March 2017 (UTC) 2767:about the topic. Regards, 2437:the other—in the article. 2350:10:41, 19 April 2007 (UTC) 2217:15:54, 21 March 2006 (UTC) 2175:20:20, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 2164:19:53, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 2151:15:19, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 2136:14:16, 22 March 2006 (UTC) 2063:18:34, 21 March 2006 (UTC) 2039:21:02, 14 March 2006 (UTC) 1992:19:07, 12 March 2006 (UTC) 1969:17:33, 12 March 2006 (UTC) 1956:21:38, 11 March 2006 (UTC) 1904:23:35, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC) 1886:20:24, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC) 1518:The Life of an Amorous Man 926:project's importance scale 821:project's importance scale 732:project's importance scale 536:project's importance scale 501:general Project discussion 301: 198:project's importance scale 175:Template:WikiProject Japan 4105:20:14, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 4080:20:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 3044:Removal of external links 2985:00:54, 2 March 2012 (UTC) 2407:07:41, 24 June 2007 (UTC) 1927:21:20, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC) 1793:One of the most important 1245:the Genji today". Cheers, 1149:14:13, Nov 1, 2004 (UTC) 1067:11:59, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC) 1010:03:04, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC) 919: 852: 814: 778:WikiProject Women writers 763: 725: 658: 620: 567: 529: 448: 240: 231: 213: 191: 88: 57: 4204:B-Class history articles 3373:08:50, 7 June 2014 (UTC) 2905:17:36, 30 May 2012 (UTC) 1913:00:43, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC) 1895:22:48, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC) 1550:There is no better place 1536:05:28, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1426:22:03, Nov 2, 2004 (UTC) 1422:are going to put it in. 1249:13:31, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1177:20:40, Nov 1, 2004 (UTC) 1155:Talk:Japanese literature 1049:10:32, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC) 906:Women's History articles 403:Japanese Knowledge (XXG) 343:Good article nominations 4015:Genji emaki azumaya.jpg 3853:External links modified 3584:External links modified 3446:External links modified 1824:16:20, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1710:07:52, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1635:11:23, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1482:Pillow Book, The (1996) 1438:05:14, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1406:17:40, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1274:16:17, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1193:05:04, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1161:14:21, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC) 1091:examples people raise: 689:WikiProject Middle Ages 216:Bibliography task force 4164:B-Class novel articles 4119:B-Class vital articles 3982:Genji emaki sekiya.jpg 3782:I'll try it: << 3277:single-purpose account 3129:Genji Monogatari Emaki 2966: 2921: 2625: 2552:your own formulation? 2157:Yosemite National Park 1261:if only to disprove it 801:Women writers articles 279: 228: 210: 178:Japan-related articles 3426:The Tale of Murasaki? 3296:-style argument that 2961: 2920: 2913:Genji chapter symbols 2747:First of all, please 2621: 2531:I hope you guys will 1514:Kōshuku Ichidai Otoku 278: 227: 209: 43:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 36:level-4 vital article 3912:regular verification 3689:regular verification 3525:regular verification 3510:to let others know. 3461:. If necessary, add 3003:And in either case, 2794:Genji Character List 2783:Genji character list 2202:C plot progression. 712:Middle Ages articles 401:an article from the 383:Japan-related stubs. 139:relevant discussions 3902:After February 2018 3679:After February 2018 3658:parameter below to 3515:After February 2018 3506:parameter below to 3408:Ancient Greek novel 2676:Medieval readership 1799:it's the greatest). 1686:outside Japan with 1526:Japanese literature 1490:have been based on 1086:World's first novel 973:Waka (poetry)#Tanka 598:Library of Congress 588:Library of Congress 559:Library of Congress 413:unassessed articles 143:lists of open tasks 133:, please visit the 4026:Community Tech bot 3993:Community Tech bot 3956:InternetArchiveBot 3907:InternetArchiveBot 3733:InternetArchiveBot 3684:InternetArchiveBot 3520:InternetArchiveBot 3294:other stuff exists 2967: 2922: 2399:The Tale of Genji. 1503:Seeds in the Heart 1474:Desejado, O (1988) 681:Middle Ages portal 479:WikiProject Novels 389:requested articles 380:Improve and expand 372:Pages for Deletion 356:Godzilla Minus One 280: 234:Culture task force 229: 211: 45:content assessment 4062: 4050:comment added by 3932: 3862:The Tale of Genji 3784:The Tale of Genji 3709: 3593:The Tale of Genji 3577: 3545: 3455:The Tale of Genji 3401: 3389:comment added by 3304:The Tale of Genji 3288:the link did not 3112:The Tale of Genji 3106:I removed the EL 3085:Japanese clothing 2924:Made an image... 2797:need most help). 2760:User:CultureDrone 2743: 2729:comment added by 2669: 2657:comment added by 2645: 2633:comment added by 2564:original research 1857:comment added by 1586:comment added by 1522:The Tale of Genji 1509:The Tale of Genji 1254:commonly parroted 991: 990: 962:in most browsers. 940: 939: 936: 935: 932: 931: 831: 830: 827: 826: 742: 741: 738: 737: 637: 636: 633: 632: 546: 545: 542: 541: 427: 426: 423: 422: 419: 418: 338: 337: 166: 127:-related articles 119:WikiProject Japan 4256: 3966: 3957: 3930: 3929: 3908: 3842: 3835: 3830: 3810: 3803: 3798: 3743: 3734: 3707: 3706: 3685: 3673: 3636: 3573: 3572:Talk to my owner 3568: 3543: 3542: 3521: 3476: 3468: 2742: 2723: 2691:Murasaki shikibu 2687:Motoori Norinaga 2683:Fujiwara Shunzei 2652: 2628: 2568:Genji Monogatari 2442:Genji Monogatari 2233: 2232: 2228: 2172: 2148: 2060: 2050:Onna San no Miya 1966: 1880:Murasaki Shikibu 1869: 1840:Free translation 1598: 1580:28 October 2011 1524:may be the only 1486:How many recent 985:Reporting errors 949: 948: 942: 908: 907: 904: 901: 898: 877: 872: 871: 870: 861: 854: 853: 848: 840: 833: 803: 802: 799: 796: 793: 772: 765: 764: 759: 751: 744: 714: 713: 710: 707: 704: 683: 678: 677: 667: 660: 659: 654: 646: 639: 627:importance scale 609: 608: 605: 602: 599: 576: 569: 568: 563: 555: 548: 518: 517: 514: 511: 508: 473: 468: 467: 457: 450: 449: 444: 436: 429: 364:requested images 300: 299: 242: 180: 179: 176: 173: 170: 163: 161: 154: 113: 108: 107: 106: 97: 90: 89: 84: 81: 66: 59: 42: 33: 32: 25: 24: 16: 4264: 4263: 4259: 4258: 4257: 4255: 4254: 4253: 4109: 4108: 4088: 4041: 4022:nomination page 4008: 3989:nomination page 3975: 3960: 3955: 3923: 3916:have permission 3906: 3870:this simple FaQ 3855: 3838: 3831: 3826: 3806: 3799: 3794: 3763:.<:/ref: --> 3752: 3737: 3732: 3700: 3693:have permission 3683: 3667: 3630: 3601:this simple FaQ 3586: 3576: 3571: 3536: 3529:have permission 3519: 3470: 3462: 3448: 3428: 3380: 3360: 3046: 3026: 2993: 2941: 2915: 2841: 2785: 2756:article history 2724: 2711: 2678: 2617: 2606: 2533:keep this civil 2456: 2357: 2339: 2234: 2230: 2226: 2224: 2223: 2197: 2170: 2146: 2058: 1964: 1941: 1875: 1852: 1842: 1624: 1581: 1277:(PS. I checked 1088: 1073: 1029:literary rival 1004: 996: 987: 965: 964: 963: 946: 905: 902: 899: 897:Women's History 896: 895: 888:Women's history 873: 868: 866: 846: 844:Women's History 800: 797: 794: 791: 790: 757: 711: 708: 705: 702: 701: 694:the Middle Ages 679: 672: 652: 606: 603: 600: 597: 596: 561: 515: 512: 509: 506: 505: 469: 462: 442: 273: 177: 174: 171: 168: 167: 157: 109: 104: 102: 82: 72: 40: 30: 12: 11: 5: 4262: 4260: 4252: 4251: 4246: 4241: 4236: 4231: 4226: 4221: 4216: 4211: 4206: 4201: 4196: 4191: 4186: 4181: 4176: 4171: 4166: 4161: 4156: 4151: 4146: 4141: 4136: 4131: 4126: 4121: 4111: 4110: 4087: 4084: 4083: 4082: 4040: 4037: 4018: 4017: 4007: 4004: 3985: 3984: 3974: 3971: 3950: 3949: 3942: 3895: 3894: 3886:Added archive 3884: 3876:Added archive 3854: 3851: 3850: 3849: 3848: 3847: 3816: 3815: 3765: 3764: 3751: 3748: 3727: 3726: 3719: 3652: 3651: 3643:Added archive 3641: 3627: 3619:Added archive 3617: 3611: 3585: 3582: 3569: 3563: 3562: 3555: 3500: 3499: 3491:Added archive 3489: 3481:Added archive 3447: 3444: 3427: 3424: 3423: 3422: 3391:70.115.149.185 3379: 3376: 3359: 3356: 3355: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3351: 3350: 3330: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3314: 3307: 3273: 3244: 3243: 3224: 3223: 3208: 3186:External links 3146: 3145: 3144: 3143: 3118: 3117: 3116: 3045: 3042: 3031:SassyLilNugget 3025: 3022: 2992: 2989: 2988: 2987: 2962:handscroll of 2940: 2937: 2914: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2889: 2888: 2849: 2848: 2840: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2784: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2752: 2751:your comments. 2710: 2707: 2677: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2659:140.254.69.123 2635:83.254.171.154 2616: 2613: 2605: 2602: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2535:... <g: --> 2526: 2525: 2510: 2509: 2494: 2493: 2455: 2452: 2421: 2420: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2377: 2369: 2365: 2356: 2353: 2338: 2335: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2263: 2262: 2222: 2220: 2196: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2054:Third Princess 2027: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1972: 1971: 1940: 1937: 1929: 1928: 1915: 1914: 1897: 1896: 1874: 1871: 1841: 1838: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1637: 1636: 1623: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1428: 1427: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1275: 1264: 1257: 1242: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1215: 1212: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1163: 1162: 1143: 1142: 1136: 1130: 1124: 1106: 1105: 1102: 1099: 1096: 1087: 1084: 1072: 1069: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1051: 1050: 1036: 1035: 1017: 1016: 1003: 1000: 995: 992: 989: 988: 982: 981: 980: 960:case-sensitive 954: 953: 952: 950: 938: 937: 934: 933: 930: 929: 922:Mid-importance 918: 912: 911: 909: 892:the discussion 879: 878: 875:History portal 862: 850: 849: 847:Mid‑importance 841: 829: 828: 825: 824: 817:Top-importance 813: 807: 806: 804: 787:the discussion 773: 761: 760: 758:Top‑importance 752: 740: 739: 736: 735: 728:Low-importance 724: 718: 717: 715: 698:the discussion 685: 684: 668: 656: 655: 653:Low‑importance 647: 635: 634: 631: 630: 623:Low-importance 619: 613: 612: 610: 593:the discussion 577: 565: 564: 562:Low‑importance 556: 544: 543: 540: 539: 532:Top-importance 528: 522: 521: 519: 516:novel articles 475: 474: 458: 446: 445: 443:Top‑importance 437: 425: 424: 421: 420: 417: 416: 415: 414: 406: 393: 384: 376: 368: 359: 336: 335: 327: 320: 311: 310: 309: 298: 297: 293:A-class review 289: 272: 271: 266: 261: 256: 250: 247: 246: 238: 237: 230: 220: 219: 212: 202: 201: 194:Top-importance 190: 184: 183: 181: 115: 114: 98: 86: 85: 83:Top‑importance 67: 55: 54: 48: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4261: 4250: 4247: 4245: 4242: 4240: 4237: 4235: 4232: 4230: 4227: 4225: 4222: 4220: 4217: 4215: 4212: 4210: 4207: 4205: 4202: 4200: 4197: 4195: 4192: 4190: 4187: 4185: 4182: 4180: 4177: 4175: 4172: 4170: 4167: 4165: 4162: 4160: 4157: 4155: 4152: 4150: 4147: 4145: 4142: 4140: 4137: 4135: 4132: 4130: 4127: 4125: 4122: 4120: 4117: 4116: 4114: 4107: 4106: 4102: 4098: 4094: 4081: 4077: 4073: 4069: 4065: 4064: 4063: 4061: 4057: 4053: 4049: 4038: 4036: 4035: 4031: 4027: 4023: 4016: 4013: 4012: 4011: 4005: 4003: 4002: 3998: 3994: 3990: 3983: 3980: 3979: 3978: 3972: 3970: 3969: 3964: 3959: 3958: 3947: 3943: 3940: 3936: 3935: 3934: 3927: 3921: 3917: 3913: 3909: 3903: 3898: 3893: 3889: 3885: 3883: 3879: 3875: 3874: 3873: 3871: 3867: 3863: 3858: 3852: 3846: 3843: 3841: 3836: 3834: 3829: 3820: 3819: 3818: 3817: 3814: 3811: 3809: 3804: 3802: 3797: 3789: 3785: 3781: 3780: 3779: 3778: 3774: 3770: 3769:86.24.169.184 3762: 3757: 3756: 3755: 3749: 3747: 3746: 3741: 3736: 3735: 3724: 3720: 3717: 3713: 3712: 3711: 3704: 3698: 3694: 3690: 3686: 3680: 3675: 3671: 3665: 3661: 3657: 3650: 3646: 3642: 3640: 3634: 3628: 3626: 3622: 3618: 3616: 3612: 3610: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3602: 3598: 3594: 3589: 3583: 3581: 3580: 3574: 3567: 3560: 3556: 3553: 3549: 3548: 3547: 3540: 3534: 3530: 3526: 3522: 3516: 3511: 3509: 3505: 3498: 3494: 3490: 3488: 3484: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3474: 3466: 3460: 3456: 3451: 3445: 3443: 3442: 3438: 3434: 3433:86.134.61.227 3425: 3421: 3417: 3413: 3409: 3404: 3403: 3402: 3400: 3396: 3392: 3388: 3377: 3375: 3374: 3370: 3366: 3357: 3349: 3345: 3341: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3331: 3326: 3322: 3318: 3317:elvenscout742 3315: 3312: 3308: 3305: 3301: 3300: 3295: 3291: 3287: 3283: 3278: 3274: 3271: 3267: 3263: 3258: 3257: 3252: 3248: 3247: 3246: 3245: 3242: 3238: 3234: 3230: 3226: 3225: 3221: 3217: 3213: 3212:elvenscout742 3209: 3207: 3203: 3199: 3198:elvenscout742 3195: 3191: 3187: 3183: 3179: 3175: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3164: 3160: 3155: 3151: 3142: 3138: 3134: 3133:elvenscout742 3130: 3126: 3125: 3124:Illustrations 3119: 3114: 3113: 3108: 3107: 3105: 3104: 3103: 3099: 3095: 3094:elvenscout742 3091: 3087: 3086: 3081: 3080: 3074: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3067: 3063: 3062:elvenscout742 3059: 3055: 3051: 3043: 3041: 3040: 3036: 3032: 3023: 3021: 3020: 3016: 3012: 3011:elvenscout742 3008: 3006: 3001: 2999: 2986: 2982: 2978: 2974: 2969: 2968: 2965: 2960: 2956: 2955: 2951: 2947: 2938: 2936: 2935: 2931: 2927: 2919: 2912: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2887: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2859: 2855: 2847: 2843: 2842: 2839:Role of women 2838: 2834: 2830: 2826: 2822: 2818: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2807: 2803: 2798: 2795: 2790: 2782: 2778: 2774: 2770: 2766: 2761: 2757: 2753: 2750: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2740: 2736: 2732: 2728: 2720: 2719:Tale of Genji 2716: 2708: 2706: 2705: 2701: 2697: 2692: 2688: 2684: 2675: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2656: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2624: 2620: 2614: 2612: 2603: 2601: 2599: 2596: 2587: 2584: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2574: 2569: 2565: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2555: 2549: 2541: 2538: 2534: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2524: 2521: 2517: 2512: 2511: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2500: 2492: 2489: 2484: 2480: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2469: 2464: 2459: 2453: 2451: 2450: 2447: 2443: 2438: 2435: 2431: 2427: 2419: 2416: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2405: 2400: 2388: 2384: 2381: 2380: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2366: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2354: 2352: 2351: 2348: 2344: 2336: 2334: 2333: 2330: 2325: 2320: 2319: 2316: 2315:Gorilla Jones 2312: 2308: 2307: 2304: 2293: 2290: 2289:Gorilla Jones 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2275: 2272: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2261: 2258: 2254: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2243: 2239: 2229: 2221: 2219: 2218: 2215: 2210: 2208: 2203: 2194: 2176: 2173: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2149: 2143: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2134: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2061: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2037: 2033: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2007: 2003: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1993: 1990: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1970: 1967: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1954: 1949: 1945: 1938: 1936: 1932: 1926: 1922: 1921:public domain 1917: 1916: 1912: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1903: 1894: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1885: 1881: 1873:Illustrations 1872: 1870: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1848: 1845: 1839: 1837: 1823: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1798: 1794: 1790: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1747: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1709: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1691: 1689: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1667: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1634: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1588:38.111.224.42 1585: 1579: 1576: 1570: 1566: 1565: 1562: 1558: 1557: 1551: 1547: 1542: 1537: 1535: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1510: 1506: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1494:? At least 5 1493: 1489: 1484: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1437: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1425: 1420: 1419: 1405: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1375: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1344: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1315: 1311: 1307:<sigh: --> 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1263:? Again, yes. 1262: 1258: 1255: 1251: 1250: 1248: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1216: 1213: 1210: 1209: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1192: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1176: 1171: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1148: 1140: 1137: 1134: 1131: 1128: 1125: 1122: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1115: 1110: 1103: 1100: 1097: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1083: 1080: 1077: 1070: 1068: 1066: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1048: 1043: 1038: 1037: 1032: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1021: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1009: 1001: 999: 993: 986: 978: 974: 970: 969: 968: 961: 957: 951: 944: 943: 927: 923: 917: 914: 913: 910: 893: 889: 885: 884: 876: 865: 863: 860: 856: 855: 851: 845: 842: 839: 835: 822: 818: 812: 809: 808: 805: 792:Women writers 788: 784: 783:women writers 780: 779: 774: 771: 767: 766: 762: 756: 755:Women writers 753: 750: 746: 733: 729: 723: 720: 719: 716: 699: 695: 691: 690: 682: 676: 671: 669: 666: 662: 661: 657: 651: 648: 645: 641: 628: 624: 618: 615: 614: 611: 594: 590: 589: 584: 583: 578: 575: 571: 570: 566: 560: 557: 554: 550: 537: 533: 527: 524: 523: 520: 503: 502: 497: 496:short stories 493: 489: 485: 481: 480: 472: 471:Novels portal 466: 461: 459: 456: 452: 451: 447: 441: 438: 435: 431: 412: 411: 407: 405:into English. 404: 400: 399: 394: 391: 390: 385: 382: 381: 377: 374: 373: 369: 366: 365: 360: 358: 357: 352: 350: 345: 344: 340: 339: 334: 332: 331: 325: 324: 318: 317: 312: 307: 304: 303: 302: 295: 294: 290: 287: 286: 282: 281: 277: 270: 267: 265: 262: 260: 257: 255: 252: 251: 249: 248: 244: 243: 239: 235: 226: 222: 221: 217: 208: 204: 203: 199: 195: 189: 186: 185: 182: 165: 162: 152: 148: 144: 140: 136: 132: 128: 126: 121: 120: 112: 101: 99: 96: 92: 91: 87: 80: 76: 71: 68: 65: 61: 56: 52: 46: 38: 37: 27: 23: 18: 17: 4089: 4052:104.4.197.57 4046:— Preceding 4042: 4019: 4009: 3986: 3976: 3954: 3951: 3926:source check 3905: 3899: 3896: 3859: 3856: 3839: 3832: 3828:Aristophanes 3827: 3807: 3800: 3796:Aristophanes 3795: 3792:How's that? 3787: 3783: 3766: 3753: 3750:Removed Text 3731: 3728: 3703:source check 3682: 3676: 3663: 3659: 3655: 3653: 3590: 3587: 3564: 3539:source check 3518: 3512: 3507: 3503: 3501: 3452: 3449: 3429: 3385:— Preceding 3381: 3361: 3297: 3293: 3289: 3285: 3281: 3255: 3250: 3228: 3193: 3190:specifically 3189: 3185: 3181: 3153: 3149: 3147: 3128: 3122: 3111: 3083: 3079:Heian period 3077: 3053: 3047: 3027: 3009: 3004: 3002: 2997: 2994: 2963: 2942: 2923: 2873: 2869: 2850: 2815:It could be 2799: 2793: 2788: 2786: 2718: 2714: 2712: 2679: 2626: 2622: 2618: 2607: 2592: 2573:Jim_Lockhart 2567: 2550: 2546: 2537:Jim_Lockhart 2515: 2495: 2482: 2478: 2462: 2460: 2457: 2446:Jim_Lockhart 2441: 2439: 2422: 2404:Jim_Lockhart 2398: 2395: 2372: 2358: 2340: 2321: 2309: 2300: 2237: 2235: 2211: 2204: 2198: 2142:Suetsumuhana 2053: 2049: 2045: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1933: 1930: 1920: 1898: 1876: 1859:210.80.252.2 1853:— Preceding 1849: 1846: 1843: 1835: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1744: 1688:Arthur Waley 1684: 1665: 1625: 1582:— Preceding 1571: 1567: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1540: 1538: 1529: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1508: 1507: 1502: 1498: 1491: 1485: 1478:Makura Sōshi 1477: 1443: 1372: 1342: 1313: 1309: 1267: 1260: 1253: 1237: 1169: 1144: 1113: 1111: 1107: 1089: 1081: 1078: 1074: 1071:56 Chapters? 1062: 1031:Sei Shonagon 1022: 1018: 1005: 997: 966: 958:Anchors are 955: 921: 881: 816: 776: 727: 687: 622: 586: 580: 531: 499: 477: 408: 396: 387: 386:Create some 378: 370: 362: 354: 349:Vinland Saga 348: 341: 328: 321: 314: 313: 305: 291: 283: 193: 155: 135:project page 123: 117: 111:Japan portal 75:Bibliography 51:WikiProjects 34: 3670:Sourcecheck 2977:Truthkeeper 2725:—Preceding 2653:—Preceding 2629:—Preceding 2386:definition. 1499:Pillow Book 1241:comparison. 1076:numbered). 1034:characters. 1008:Montréalais 1002:Kanji/Kana? 703:Middle Ages 650:Middle Ages 351:(TV series) 285:Peer review 131:participate 4113:Categories 3963:Report bug 3788:monogatari 3740:Report bug 3412:Prosfilaes 3365:Stighammar 3340:Boneyard90 3266:WP:ELMAYBE 3233:Boneyard90 3159:Boneyard90 2615:Authorship 2595:Shirokuma1 2554:Shirokuma1 2499:Shirokuma1 2468:Shirokuma1 2310:This page 2171:Gryffindor 2147:Gryffindor 2059:Gryffindor 1965:Gryffindor 1882:'s time). 492:novelettes 141:, and see 3946:this tool 3939:this tool 3723:this tool 3716:this tool 3633:dead link 3559:this tool 3552:this tool 2973:emakimono 2825:Malkinann 2765:consensus 2337:Structure 2303:Malkinann 2271:Malkinann 2242:Malkinann 2214:Tachikoma 2161:Tachikoma 2133:Tachikoma 2036:Tachikoma 1989:Tachikoma 1953:Tachikoma 1925:Askewmind 1911:Chinasaur 1902:Askewmind 1893:Chinasaur 1884:askewmind 1608:Hrishikes 1604:Kadambari 1554:See also 1308:Japanese 1170:mentioned 971:] Anchor 398:translate 39:is rated 4048:unsigned 3952:Cheers.— 3729:Cheers.— 3565:Cheers.— 3465:cbignore 3387:unsigned 3262:WP:ELYES 3178:WP:ELYES 2926:AnonMoos 2878:Rabbit36 2870:strongly 2854:Uncle Ed 2739:contribs 2727:unsigned 2709:Utsusemi 2655:unsigned 2631:unsigned 2516:Hahakigi 2373:physical 1855:unsigned 1706:Cheers, 1584:unsigned 1268:it isn't 1042:yokibito 488:novellas 323:Pictures 316:Articles 3866:my edit 3656:checked 3637:tag to 3597:my edit 3575::Online 3504:checked 3459:my edit 3383:work. 3311:WP:GANG 3270:WP:ELNO 3174:WP:ELNO 3050:WP:ELNO 3005:Shikibu 2819:into a 2769:Bendono 2434:WP:MPOV 2207:sandbox 2201:B-: --> 2006:sandbox 1822:Vincent 1708:Vincent 1669:today": 1633:Vincent 1480:? One. 1424:Sekicho 1404:Vincent 1247:Vincent 1238:opinion 1175:Sekicho 1159:Vincent 1147:Sekicho 1065:Vincent 1047:Vincent 994:Stages? 924:on the 819:on the 730:on the 625:on the 534:on the 333:: None 326:: None 319:: None 259:history 196:on the 160:Refresh 79:Culture 41:B-class 3840:(talk) 3808:(talk) 3664:failed 3629:Added 3473:nobots 3054:single 2946:Lumos3 2897:Homunq 2696:Aphaia 2619:This: 2583:Aphaia 2520:Aphaia 2488:Aphaia 2430:WP:ATT 2415:Aphaia 2347:Aphaia 2225:": --> 2046:Nyōsan 1797:I feel 1561:Ken6en 1374:drama. 1040:Heian 507:Novels 484:novels 440:Novels 410:Assess 296:: None 288:: None 47:scale. 3823:: --> 3791:: --> 3299:Haiku 3251:Genji 3229:until 2964:Genji 2817:split 2802:Oticu 2789:Genji 2731:Oticu 2715:Genji 2604:names 2483:Genji 2479:Genji 2463:Genji 2454:Bilge 2368:rape. 2342:field 2238:least 1541:Genji 1530:Genji 1492:Genji 1488:manga 1466:anime 1458:anime 1015:(UTC) 977:Tanka 395:Help 330:Lists 269:purge 264:watch 169:Japan 151:Reiwa 125:Japan 70:Japan 28:This 4101:talk 4097:Th55 4076:talk 4072:Th55 4056:talk 4030:talk 3997:talk 3773:talk 3660:true 3508:true 3437:talk 3416:talk 3395:talk 3369:talk 3344:talk 3321:talk 3302:and 3290:then 3268:and 3237:talk 3216:talk 3202:talk 3182:here 3163:talk 3154:does 3137:talk 3098:talk 3090:here 3066:talk 3058:here 3035:talk 3015:talk 2998:Tale 2981:talk 2950:talk 2930:talk 2901:talk 2882:talk 2858:talk 2829:talk 2823:? -- 2806:talk 2773:talk 2749:sign 2735:talk 2700:talk 2663:talk 2639:talk 2329:Mizi 2257:Mizi 2227:edit 1863:talk 1612:talk 1592:talk 1436:Carl 1314:must 1283:Carl 1272:Carl 1191:Carl 956:Tip: 494:and 361:Add 254:edit 4024:. — 3991:. — 3920:RfC 3890:to 3880:to 3697:RfC 3674:). 3662:or 3647:to 3623:to 3533:RfC 3495:to 3485:to 3286:and 3194:and 3150:can 3082:or 2874:not 2610:--> 2600:]] 2200:--> 2048:or 1931:-- 1666:why 1468:), 1460:), 1310:lit 1279:Rib 1270:?-- 916:Mid 811:Top 722:Low 617:Low 526:Top 188:Top 153:6) 147:JST 4115:: 4103:) 4078:) 4058:) 4032:) 3999:) 3933:. 3928:}} 3924:{{ 3833:68 3801:68 3775:) 3710:. 3705:}} 3701:{{ 3672:}} 3668:{{ 3635:}} 3631:{{ 3546:. 3541:}} 3537:{{ 3471:{{ 3467:}} 3463:{{ 3439:) 3418:) 3397:) 3371:) 3346:) 3323:) 3282:if 3264:, 3239:) 3218:) 3204:) 3165:) 3139:) 3100:) 3092:. 3068:) 3060:. 3037:) 3017:) 2983:) 2952:) 2932:) 2903:) 2884:) 2860:) 2852:-- 2831:) 2808:) 2800:-- 2775:) 2741:) 2737:• 2702:) 2694:-- 2665:) 2641:) 2486:-- 2209:. 1891:-- 1865:) 1791:? 1614:) 1594:) 1559:) 1534:gK 1472:, 1452:, 1448:, 1343:is 1114:is 490:, 486:, 353:, 346:: 308:– 149:, 77:/ 73:: 4099:( 4074:( 4054:( 4028:( 3995:( 3965:) 3961:( 3948:. 3941:. 3771:( 3742:) 3738:( 3725:. 3718:. 3561:. 3554:. 3435:( 3414:( 3393:( 3367:( 3342:( 3319:( 3235:( 3222:) 3214:( 3200:( 3161:( 3135:( 3096:( 3064:( 3033:( 3013:( 2979:( 2948:( 2928:( 2899:( 2880:( 2856:( 2827:( 2804:( 2771:( 2733:( 2698:( 2661:( 2637:( 2231:] 1861:( 1610:( 1590:( 1516:( 1464:( 1456:( 1141:. 1135:. 1129:. 1123:. 979:. 928:. 823:. 734:. 629:. 538:. 392:. 236:. 218:. 200:. 164:) 156:( 53::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index