Knowledge

Talk:Third-party and independent candidates for the 2016 United States presidential election/Archive 2

Source 📝

1296:) still lists as in progress or pending for write-in access; no citations were given for these inclusions. I have particular concern regarding the status of New Hampshire and Vermont. The aforementioned web page includes a map which shows these states as pending for write-in status yet the accompanying list shows them as already having write-in access. This is especially important right now because with the 7 electoral votes of these two states, Darrell Castle has exceeded access to 270 electoral votes, warranting a category change, but without them, the Constitution Party still has access to only 269 electoral votes, including the 4 electoral votes of Idaho where Scott Copeland is on the ballot as the nominee. So I don't know which we should go by- the map or the list. I posted as a question about this problem on the "United States presidential election, 2016" talk page but received no responses. 1642:
NOW but we should have the boxes ready. We will know if McMullin won Utah on the 9th. If he does he should be on top. If not, not. We should organize it this way. Electoral vote on top. Then over a million popular votes, then over a hundred thousand, then over ten thousand...several of the candidates listed near the top will go to the bottom of the list, as the write-ins will not be published in the media, so minor candidates who are only on the ballot in one or two states, will only have those totals published. How do I know this? That's what happened last time and the time before.
1741:. The idea is that when in-depth coverage would be too lengthy for a parent article, you put highlights in the main article and then go on at length in the more specialized article. That means that some of the data there might be trimmed. I should note that has nothing to do with the election being over though -- a page like this is meant to document history, and how the U.S. electoral system worked (or didn't) in the 2010s, and should remain useful in years to come. 31: 1699:, this pages seems to have marginal value. The only information that this page has that the main election page doesn't is the list of candidates with no ballot access and the failed nominees for the third parties. All the other information is redundant with the main elections page, and as most people are paying attention to that one and neglecting this one, this one seems to fall out of date rather easily. 1538: 1468:
Well, it has this year and it's running a fusion campaign in California. Also, the Independence, Working Families and Conservative parties of New York frequently run candidates of their own for statewide offices, as did the Liberal party back in the day, and the WFP is in several other states besides
1434:
If Bill and others think the fusion section should be further down the page, that's perfectly fine. I'm cool with that but the "satellite parties" in New York generally do much better than all the other third party candidates do nationwide and have for many decades. When independent candidates are on
952:
Should this not be a separate section again, since they nominated Copeland instead of the national ticket? If Copeland has agreed to be a stand-in or something, I can understand that (and, if so, a note should be added), but, from what I have seen, that is not the case. By the logic that is currently
517:
Good question, and good observation. Both the GP and LP candidates should be listed in order of delegate votes received at the parties' nominating conventions, since that was what determined the nomination for each party. This is particularity true of the LP, given that its primaries are non-binding,
282:
Although the division between parties with 270 electoral votes and those with less makes sense, I believe that the threshold of 50 is arbitrary and meaningless. I propose that instead, all parties with less than 270 electoral votes are listed in a single section and sorted by the number of electoral
628:
I am reverting your revert of my changes to American Delta Party and Reform party. Several of the states mentioned have been filed, but not yet confirmed by the SoS. It is not good to count chickens before they hatch. The SoS rejected Rocky's filing both in PA and WA, which will require injunctions
1641:
No. I just want the results of the general election listed for each candidate and that's the easiest way to do it. I'm thinking about what to do on the ninth when all this insanity is over. The order shoudn't be in number of states a candidate is on the ballot, but by vote totals. We cannot do that
394:
I agree that these should be merged, as they will represent a single "ticket" in the general election. The Reform primary candidates can be listed as a subsection of the combined ADP/RP heading. The same standard would apply to the Natural Law Party, Peace and Freedom Party and American Independent
423:
The AIP will nominate Donald Trump. Based on your logic, we should add AIP/Republican Party. That is wrong on many levels, particularly in the presumption it creates that somehow these parties have merged with each other. The Natural Law Party nomination is different since there is no indication
470:
I'm speaking conceptually, not literally. Consider a race car team. The members all have their own homes, families and careers, but for the purposes of the race, they function as a single team. Likewise, several parties that share a candidate, work as a team to get their message out and maximize
1829:
There are sections in some of the less-known candidates write-ups with things like "Electoral votes:9". I assume these are the hypothetically winnable electoral votes given ballot access but not supposing write-in can work. Since that's all very hypothetical I think it should be "hypothetical
814:
It is easy to see which candidates have access for more than half of electoral votes in any case. The 50% cut off is somewhat arbitrary, being relevant to some parties, but not much to others. My main reason for the change is so that it is easier to see where each party section begins. Now the
1430:
I noticed Bill Saturn decided to revert the work I did, calling them bad edits. Why? The NY Conservative, Working Families, Woman's Equality and Independence parties are genuine third parties who have nominated one of the two major candidates. If it's acceptable to have one fusion candidacy,
968:
This is noted in Copeland's entry under the Constitution Party candidates. I do not believe the Reform Party of New York has officially nominated Trump yet but if it does I plan add a note to his entry here under AIP. It will read, "Will appear on the ballot in New York as the Reform Party
59: 1830:
electoral votes" or something - otherwise people from non-US countries might imagine these minor candidates actually won a few electoral votes somehow. And the data should be fleshed out to include similar featuring of potential electoral vote totals for the major third party candidates.
784:
I propose that we eliminate the "Ballot access to 270 or more electoral votes" and " Ballot access to fewer than 270 electoral votes" headings, in order to distinguish the party sections better. I would leave the "No ballot access" section for whatever parties and candidates fit there.
1597:
Also, if McMullin wins Utah, he should be listed at under the heading "candidates who have won one or more electoral votes," and if Stein gets that Washington faithless elector, who's threatening to be that, then she should be up there too. 12:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC) Any objections?
501:
Why are these two parties formatted so differently? The GP list shows delegate counts for candidates, while the LP list shows how many primary votes candidates received, even though the delegate count at convention was not in any way tied to the handful of primaries that happened.
47: 17: 1391:
Several of the candidates listed in this article as having no ballot access have not filed as a write-in candidate anywhere, meanwhile several candidates who have filed as write-ins in more than 1 state are not listed. Should this be changed? If so, by what criteria?
1291:
I have had to do major edits on the ballot access info for the Constitution Party. A couple of write-in states were included with the normal ballot access states and several states were included as write-ins which the Constitution Party's own ballot access web page
1656:
I don't have a problem with the reformat, but you did it in a very sloppy manner, leaving open some tables, changing La Riva's name to "de Riva". You really should use the "show preview" button and fix your errors before hitting the "save changes"
912:
So. The Constitution PARTY is about to reach 270 Electoral Votes access. The problem is that is when you tally in Write-In votes. Their real access is like 180 or something, so the question is do we move them to the 270 category or not?
1517: 629:
to reverse these decisions. Rocky submitted 2,000 signatures in CA (of a required 178,000). He will sue, and will likely force some revision to the requirement, but probably not enough, nor soon enough to help him this election.
1067: 1056: 1045: 1034: 83: 1491:
With the election only two weeks away, I would like to suggest the following revisions. First, the listing of candidates change from state ballot access to popular votes and that these be presented this way:
209:
If I am not mistaken the AFP has decided to endorse Donald Trump for President. What should we do with the party in the article? Remove it completely or make a note that it ended up not running a candidate.
438:
The AIP has neglected to run or support an independent ticket. They have instead chosen fusion with the Republican ticket. So yes, they are now part of the GOP/AIP ticket. That is if the CA SoS allows such
1165:
per nom. BTW, I am the one who reverted the move previously. I did so because no explanation was given for the move, and I didn't see the rationale. Now, it has been explained and I do see the rationale.--
1444: 263: 932:, both the Constitution and the Justice parties are included in the over 270 category though you have to include write-in access for them to have access to more than 270 electoral votes. 380:
No they shouldn't. They are separate entities. Several other candidates sought the Reform Party nomination. No one other than De La Fuente sought the American Delta Party nomination.--
868:
The New York Conservative party, the Working Families Party (in New York), The New York Independence Party, the Woman's Equality Party and the American Independent Party in California.
1839: 1750: 1723: 1708: 1680: 1666: 1651: 1636: 1621: 1607: 1478: 1463: 1420: 1401: 1377: 1354: 1320: 1305: 1257: 1236: 1207: 1174: 1157: 1140: 1116: 1096: 1024: 978: 962: 941: 922: 899: 877: 860: 846: 824: 809: 794: 659: 641: 614: 583: 562: 527: 511: 480: 465: 451: 433: 418: 404: 389: 374: 350: 322: 307: 298:
I agree. This proposed change to the sorting order is more practical and user/reader-friendly than the current set-up, IMO. What's the significance of "50 electoral votes", anyway?--
292: 271: 236: 219: 199: 1364:
There is a Request for Comments regarding threshold for candidate inclusion in the infobox on the United States presidential election, 2016 page. Please add your perspective to
593:
Bradford Lyttle of the US Pacifist Party has ballot access in Colorado. Here is a link to the Colorado SOS website with his name among the certified presidential candidates.
650:
The pages on Knowledge need to match reality. As an encyclopedia it is not our role to predict the outcome of lawsuits. As ballot lines are confirmed, they should be added.
1365: 1311:
The CP map which you link to shows NH and VT as write-in. The states AL, IA, NH, NJ, PA, RI, and VT do not require candidate declaration or filing for write-in.
151: 147: 133: 227:
I suggest deletion. The section has information about former candidates, but this article is primarily about candidates, not a stub for former candidates.
711: 1696: 365:
Since Rocky De la Fuente is the nominee of both parties, I propose that these sections be combined together and the electoral votes be added up.
1411:
With McMullin getting within striking distance of actually WINNING Utah, I've decided to add that polling data I could find. I hope that's okay.
542:), New York is not yet included so why does it say that on the Knowledge page? I don't want to delete however without getting an explanation. 330:
How about the sort order be based on these criteria (in this order, in the case of ties): electoral votes, number of states, alphabetical?
929: 1769: 1002:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
891: 606: 267: 1198: 558: 1397: 1104: 837:
This article should be amended to note that there are also fusion candidates in States such as New York, that are not included.
738: 507: 318: 250: 684: 1350: 346: 904:---Still missing, someone must really hate them. Workers World Party trolls? Party of Socialism and Liberation? Hmmm.... 1627:
Not sure exactly what you're proposing. Do you want to remove all the candidates that ran for the party's nomination? --
1387:
The Green Papers has this list showing candidates who are on the ballot AND those who have filed as write-in candidates:
194: 1719: 1662: 1632: 1459: 1454:
is a legitimate third party that does not regularly endorse major party candidates like the others you listed above.--
974: 953:
being utilized, should we mention the Reform Party of New York nominating Donald Trump instead of Rocky De La Fuente?
805: 461: 429: 414: 385: 1799: 1551: 1451: 1228: 38: 1267: 993: 1393: 1293: 800:
Why? This shows which parties have enough ballot access to potentially win a majority of the electoral votes. --
503: 314: 150:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
918: 856: 215: 895: 1738: 1676: 1647: 1617: 1603: 1474: 1440: 1416: 873: 610: 579: 370: 185: 91: 632:
The Reform Party has ballot lines in FL, LA, and MS, So I moved these states from ADP to the Reform Party.
1715: 1658: 1628: 1455: 970: 801: 457: 425: 410: 381: 914: 852: 647:"The pages on wikipedia need to match and he is likely to win those lawsuits anyway." -from edit summary 211: 1388: 1277: 1222: 1195: 1003: 625: 597: 554: 366: 169:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
157: 99: 90:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 550: 1170: 1136: 1132: 1112: 1108: 958: 842: 602: 546: 523: 334: 303: 259: 124: 1253: 1804: 1704: 1672: 1643: 1613: 1599: 1470: 1436: 1412: 1373: 1347: 1316: 1153: 869: 820: 790: 655: 637: 575: 476: 447: 400: 342: 288: 232: 1714:
Once the election is over, most of the candidates now listed on the main page will be removed.--
930:
https://en.wikipedia.org/United_States_third-party_and_independent_presidential_candidates,_2012
154:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
170: 1332: 1301: 1020: 937: 758: 1189: 251:
http://ballot-access.org/2016/08/09/reform-party-nominates-rocky-de-la-fuente-for-president/
18:
Talk:Third-party and independent candidates for the 2016 United States presidential election
177: 1166: 1091: 954: 838: 767: 519: 299: 574:
He now has ballot status (in Colorado). This article will need to be updated accordingly.
539: 456:
I don't think that's true at all. Do you have a reference to back up that assertion? --
1795: 1522: 1249: 1128: 136:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 176:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1835: 1773: 1746: 1732: 1700: 1369: 1341: 1312: 1149: 816: 786: 712:"Washington Secretary of State Determines that Five Presidential Petitions are Valid" 651: 633: 472: 443: 396: 338: 284: 283:
votes. Right now, each subsection is almost (but not quite) sorted alphabetically.
228: 1297: 1016: 933: 143: 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1276:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
1245: 1216: 1183: 1084: 1080: 142:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1294:
http://www.constitutionparty.com/get-involved/election-central/ballot-access/
1542: 442:
When parties share a ticket, they are essentially merged for that election.
1435:
different party lines in different states, we should combine the sections.
1148:
per nom and Nyuszika7H. Really, someone reverted this move before? Why?
1131:
move has been previously reverted, so I thought it should go through a RM.
409:
That's an illegitimate argument and a made up standard with no precedent.--
1331:
There is currently a poll taking place regarding the infobox image at the
1831: 1742: 1671:
I have no problem at all with constructive criticism like you just gave.
1431:
California's American Independent line, listed, then why not the others?
1073:
United States third-party and independent presidential candidates, 1996
1068:
United States third party and independent presidential candidates, 1996
1062:
United States third-party and independent presidential candidates, 2008
1057:
United States third party and independent presidential candidates, 2008
1051:
United States third-party and independent presidential candidates, 2012
1046:
United States third party and independent presidential candidates, 2012
1040:
United States third-party and independent presidential candidates, 2016
1035:
United States third party and independent presidential candidates, 2016
84:
United States third party and independent presidential candidates, 2016
1516: 313:
I think a designation of "Single state access" would make more sense.
1389:
http://www.thegreenpapers.com/G16/President-BallotAccessByState.phtml
598:
http://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/elections/vote/generalCandidates.html
1336: 249:
Rocky De La Fuente is now the nominee of the Reform Party (Source:
100:
http://web.archive.org/web/20160315171155/http://www.dunham2016.com/
1360:
RfC on United States presidential election, 2016 infobox inclusion
1800:"Constitution Party Nominates Darrell Castle and Scott Bradley" 1335:
those involved in editing this article might be interested in
25: 1339:. The polling is set to conclude on September 20, 2016. -- 103: 109:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
94:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
739:"Reform Party Nominates Rocky De La Fuente for President" 685:"No one Challenges Any Pennsylvania Statewide Petitions" 1770:"US: Darrell Castle named Constitution Party candidate" 1072: 1061: 1050: 1039: 87: 1695:
Now that third parties are on the main elections page
540:
https://www.lp.org/2016-presidential-ballot-access-map
1266:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
256:Please update this article accordingly. Thank you. 1006:. No further edits should be made to this section. 146:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1531:Constitution Party vice presidential nominee, 2008 1280:. No further edits should be made to this section. 518:and all of the convention delegates are unbound.-- 497:Formatting of Libertarian & Green Party lists 1287:Darrell Castle Ballot Access and Category Change 621:American Delta Party / Reform Party ballot lines 1079:– Basic requirement of English typography, and 132:This message was posted before February 2018. 8: 815:smaller headings seem to all run together. 361:Combining American Delta and Reform Parties 1127:– This seems straightforward to me, but a 992:The following is a closed discussion of a 600: 257: 82:I have just modified one external link on 1697:United States presidential election, 2016 1494: 538:According to the ballot access website ( 395:Party, as they announce their nominees. 1761: 1103:This is a contested technical request ( 675: 264:2600:1003:B845:32DC:B081:535C:7B0B:DE51 1219:. Simple and plan. Who wants dessert? 756: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 121:to let others know (documentation at 7: 1011:The result of the move request was: 766:Text "Ballot Access News" ignored ( 245:Reform Party nominates De La Fuente 1691:Is this page even needed any more? 1425: 890:the section seems to be missing.-- 737:Winger, Richard (August 9, 2016). 710:Winger, Richard (August 5, 2016). 683:Winger, Richard (August 9, 2016). 534:Ballot Access for Libertarian Pary 24: 424:the nomination was challenged. -- 86:. Please take a moment to review 1612:Seeing none, I'll get cracking. 1572:highest single state percentage 1536: 1515: 29: 1186:and basic English orthography. 589:US Pacifist Party Ballot Access 1355:19:17, 10 September 2016 (UTC) 1333:Donald Trump article talk page 1321:11:21, 16 September 2016 (UTC) 1: 1840:00:16, 15 December 2016 (UTC) 1751:00:13, 15 December 2016 (UTC) 1306:15:33, 5 September 2016 (UTC) 1258:20:25, 2 September 2016 (UTC) 1237:19:45, 2 September 2016 (UTC) 1187: 1025:15:40, 3 September 2016 (UTC) 985:Requested move 27 August 2016 942:14:44, 5 September 2016 (UTC) 1724:07:45, 28 October 2016 (UTC) 1709:08:08, 29 October 2016 (UTC) 1681:18:44, 31 October 2016 (UTC) 1667:16:51, 31 October 2016 (UTC) 1652:13:05, 31 October 2016 (UTC) 1637:18:00, 30 October 2016 (UTC) 1622:17:57, 30 October 2016 (UTC) 1608:12:14, 27 October 2016 (UTC) 1479:17:55, 30 October 2016 (UTC) 1464:07:47, 28 October 2016 (UTC) 1445:11:37, 27 October 2016 (UTC) 1421:13:53, 16 October 2016 (UTC) 1402:14:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC) 1378:00:38, 11 October 2016 (UTC) 1327:Notification of run-off vote 878:11:42, 27 October 2016 (UTC) 1569:highest single state total 1383:No ballot access candidates 1208:20:57, 30 August 2016 (UTC) 1175:20:30, 30 August 2016 (UTC) 1158:16:53, 30 August 2016 (UTC) 1141:14:22, 27 August 2016 (UTC) 1117:14:22, 27 August 2016 (UTC) 1097:10:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC) 979:19:47, 22 August 2016 (UTC) 963:09:59, 22 August 2016 (UTC) 948:Constitution Party of Idaho 923:06:18, 21 August 2016 (UTC) 900:19:37, 20 August 2016 (UTC) 861:10:31, 15 August 2016 (UTC) 847:20:02, 14 August 2016 (UTC) 825:02:45, 14 August 2016 (UTC) 810:01:15, 14 August 2016 (UTC) 795:22:26, 13 August 2016 (UTC) 660:23:24, 13 August 2016 (UTC) 642:19:57, 13 August 2016 (UTC) 615:20:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC) 584:13:50, 12 August 2016 (UTC) 563:20:13, 11 August 2016 (UTC) 528:16:13, 17 August 2016 (UTC) 512:16:17, 10 August 2016 (UTC) 481:18:08, 14 August 2016 (UTC) 466:06:32, 14 August 2016 (UTC) 452:03:22, 14 August 2016 (UTC) 434:23:38, 13 August 2016 (UTC) 419:23:33, 13 August 2016 (UTC) 405:22:11, 13 August 2016 (UTC) 390:05:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC) 375:16:02, 10 August 2016 (UTC) 351:18:46, 10 August 2016 (UTC) 323:16:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC) 308:15:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC) 293:08:10, 10 August 2016 (UTC) 237:08:00, 10 August 2016 (UTC) 1855: 1510:Vice presidential nominee 1452:American Independent Party 272:20:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC) 220:18:02, 8 August 2016 (UTC) 163:(last update: 5 June 2024) 104:http://www.dunham2016.com/ 79:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1426:What's TRUMP doing there? 200:17:12, 21 July 2016 (UTC) 1577:wakka wakka flame party 1273:Please do not modify it. 999:Please do not modify it. 1487:November 9th suggestion 908:Write-In Access Counts? 886:Socialist Workers Party 75:External links modified 780:Bold structural change 205:American Freedom Party 1394:FreePressPublications 504:FreePressPublications 315:FreePressPublications 42:of past discussions. 1566:National percentage 745:. Ballot Access News 718:. Ballot Access News 691:. Ballot Access News 570:Evan McMullin update 144:regular verification 134:After February 2018 113:parameter below to 1825:"Electoral votes:" 1805:Ballot Access News 1798:(April 16, 2016). 188:InternetArchiveBot 139:InternetArchiveBot 1716:William S. Saturn 1659:William S. Saturn 1629:William S. Saturn 1595: 1594: 1532: 1456:William S. Saturn 1233: 1119: 971:William S. Saturn 802:William S. Saturn 743:ballot-access.org 716:ballot-access.org 689:ballot-access.org 617: 605:comment added by 566: 549:comment added by 458:William S. Saturn 426:William S. Saturn 411:William S. Saturn 382:William S. Saturn 354: 337:comment added by 274: 262:comment added by 164: 72: 71: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 1846: 1817: 1816: 1814: 1812: 1792: 1786: 1785: 1783: 1781: 1776:. April 16, 2016 1766: 1739:WP:Summary style 1736: 1552:Scott N. Bradley 1541: 1540: 1539: 1530: 1519: 1501:Prior positions 1495: 1353: 1344: 1275: 1234: 1231: 1227: 1225: 1224:CookieMonster755 1206: 1102: 1094: 1089: 1075: 1064: 1053: 1042: 1001: 772: 771: 764: 762: 754: 752: 750: 734: 728: 727: 725: 723: 707: 701: 700: 698: 696: 680: 565: 543: 353: 331: 198: 189: 162: 161: 140: 128: 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 1854: 1853: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1827: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1810: 1808: 1796:Winger, Richard 1794: 1793: 1789: 1779: 1777: 1768: 1767: 1763: 1730: 1693: 1563:National Total 1547:April 16, 2016 1537: 1535: 1489: 1428: 1409: 1407:Polling results 1385: 1362: 1346: 1340: 1329: 1289: 1284: 1271: 1229: 1223: 1221: 1204: 1092: 1085: 1071: 1060: 1049: 1038: 997: 987: 950: 910: 888: 835: 782: 777: 776: 775: 765: 755: 748: 746: 736: 735: 731: 721: 719: 709: 708: 704: 694: 692: 682: 681: 677: 623: 591: 572: 544: 536: 499: 363: 332: 280: 247: 207: 192: 187: 155: 148:have permission 138: 122: 92:this simple FaQ 77: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1852: 1850: 1826: 1823: 1819: 1818: 1787: 1760: 1759: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1727: 1726: 1692: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1669: 1593: 1592: 1589: 1587: 1584: 1581: 1578: 1574: 1573: 1570: 1567: 1564: 1561: 1560:Other parties 1557: 1556: 1548: 1545: 1533: 1529: 1526: 1523:Darrell Castle 1520: 1512: 1511: 1508: 1505: 1502: 1499: 1488: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1427: 1424: 1408: 1405: 1384: 1381: 1366:the discussion 1361: 1358: 1328: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1288: 1285: 1283: 1282: 1268:requested move 1262: 1261: 1260: 1239: 1210: 1202: 1177: 1160: 1143: 1121: 1120: 1077: 1076: 1065: 1054: 1043: 1030: 1028: 1009: 1008: 994:requested move 988: 986: 983: 982: 981: 949: 946: 945: 944: 915:Political Boss 909: 906: 887: 884: 883: 882: 881: 880: 853:Political Boss 834: 831: 830: 829: 828: 827: 781: 778: 774: 773: 729: 702: 674: 673: 669: 665: 664: 663: 662: 622: 619: 590: 587: 571: 568: 535: 532: 531: 530: 498: 495: 494: 493: 492: 491: 490: 489: 488: 487: 486: 485: 484: 483: 440: 421: 362: 359: 358: 357: 356: 355: 311: 310: 279: 276: 246: 243: 242: 241: 240: 239: 212:Political Boss 206: 203: 182: 181: 174: 107: 106: 98:Added archive 76: 73: 70: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1851: 1842: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1824: 1807: 1806: 1801: 1797: 1791: 1788: 1775: 1774:Aljazeera.com 1771: 1765: 1762: 1758: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1734: 1729: 1728: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1701:User:Dhalsim2 1698: 1690: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1673:Arglebargle79 1670: 1668: 1664: 1660: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1644:Arglebargle79 1640: 1639: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1614:Arglebargle79 1610: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1600:Arglebargle79 1590: 1585: 1582: 1579: 1576: 1575: 1571: 1568: 1565: 1562: 1559: 1558: 1554: 1553: 1549: 1546: 1544: 1534: 1527: 1525: 1524: 1518: 1514: 1513: 1509: 1506: 1503: 1500: 1497: 1496: 1493: 1486: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1471:Arglebargle79 1467: 1466: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1437:Arglebargle79 1432: 1423: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1413:Arglebargle79 1406: 1404: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1390: 1382: 1380: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1359: 1357: 1356: 1352: 1349: 1343: 1338: 1334: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1286: 1281: 1279: 1274: 1269: 1264: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1240: 1238: 1235: 1232: 1226: 1218: 1214: 1211: 1209: 1200: 1197: 1194: 1192: 1185: 1181: 1178: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1161: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1144: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1123: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1095: 1090: 1088: 1082: 1074: 1069: 1066: 1063: 1058: 1055: 1052: 1047: 1044: 1041: 1036: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1027: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1007: 1005: 1000: 995: 990: 989: 984: 980: 976: 972: 967: 966: 965: 964: 960: 956: 947: 943: 939: 935: 931: 927: 926: 925: 924: 920: 916: 907: 905: 902: 901: 897: 893: 892:82.113.98.251 885: 879: 875: 871: 870:Arglebargle79 867: 866: 865: 864: 863: 862: 858: 854: 849: 848: 844: 840: 832: 826: 822: 818: 813: 812: 811: 807: 803: 799: 798: 797: 796: 792: 788: 779: 769: 760: 744: 740: 733: 730: 717: 713: 706: 703: 690: 686: 679: 676: 672: 668: 661: 657: 653: 649: 648: 646: 645: 644: 643: 639: 635: 630: 627: 626:WaunaKeegan11 620: 618: 616: 612: 608: 607:198.209.8.227 604: 599: 594: 588: 586: 585: 581: 577: 576:SecretName101 569: 567: 564: 560: 556: 552: 548: 541: 533: 529: 525: 521: 516: 515: 514: 513: 509: 505: 496: 482: 478: 474: 469: 468: 467: 463: 459: 455: 454: 453: 449: 445: 441: 437: 436: 435: 431: 427: 422: 420: 416: 412: 408: 407: 406: 402: 398: 393: 392: 391: 387: 383: 379: 378: 377: 376: 372: 368: 367:WaunaKeegan11 360: 352: 348: 344: 340: 336: 329: 328: 327: 326: 325: 324: 320: 316: 309: 305: 301: 297: 296: 295: 294: 290: 286: 285:User:Dhalsim2 277: 275: 273: 269: 265: 261: 254: 252: 244: 238: 234: 230: 229:User:Dhalsim2 226: 225: 224: 223: 222: 221: 217: 213: 204: 202: 201: 196: 191: 190: 179: 175: 172: 168: 167: 166: 159: 153: 149: 145: 141: 135: 130: 126: 120: 116: 112: 105: 101: 97: 96: 95: 93: 89: 85: 80: 74: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 1828: 1809:. Retrieved 1803: 1790: 1778:. Retrieved 1764: 1756: 1694: 1611: 1596: 1550: 1521: 1490: 1433: 1429: 1410: 1386: 1363: 1330: 1290: 1272: 1265: 1241: 1220: 1212: 1190: 1179: 1162: 1145: 1124: 1086: 1078: 1029: 1012: 1010: 998: 991: 969:nominee." -- 951: 911: 903: 889: 851:Examples? -- 850: 836: 783: 747:. Retrieved 742: 732: 720:. Retrieved 715: 705: 693:. Retrieved 688: 678: 670: 667:-footnotes- 666: 631: 624: 601:— Preceding 595: 592: 573: 545:— Preceding 537: 500: 471:their vote. 364: 333:— Preceding 312: 281: 258:— Preceding 255: 248: 208: 186: 183: 158:source check 137: 131: 118: 114: 110: 108: 81: 78: 65: 43: 37: 1278:move review 1191:SMcCandlish 1004:move review 551:Espnfan8123 125:Sourcecheck 36:This is an 1757:References 1507:Nominated 1469:New York. 1246:MOS:HYPHEN 1217:MOS:HYPHEN 1184:MOS:HYPHEN 1167:NextUSprez 1133:nyuszika7h 1109:nyuszika7h 1081:MOS:HYPHEN 955:ALPolitico 839:Theoallen1 749:August 13, 722:August 13, 695:August 13, 671:References 520:NextUSprez 300:Newbreeder 278:Sort Order 195:Report bug 1811:April 18, 1780:April 18, 1657:button.-- 1543:Tennessee 1528:Attorney, 1250:JayJasper 1105:permalink 178:this tool 171:this tool 66:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 1733:Dhalsim2 1580:182,334 1555:of Utah 1370:Bcharles 1313:Bcharles 1150:Dicklyon 928:Over at 817:Bcharles 787:Bcharles 759:cite web 652:Bcharles 634:Bcharles 603:unsigned 559:contribs 547:unsigned 473:Bcharles 444:Bcharles 397:Bcharles 347:contribs 339:Dhalsim2 335:unsigned 260:unsigned 184:Cheers.— 1298:VladJ92 1242:Support 1213:Support 1180:Support 1163:Support 1146:Support 1125:Support 1093:(talk) 1017:Amakuru 934:VladJ92 439:fusion. 111:checked 88:my edit 39:archive 1588:Idaho 1586:11,111 1504:State 833:fusion 596:LINK: 119:failed 1583:0.3% 1498:Name 1230:𝚨-𝛀 1013:Moved 16:< 1836:talk 1813:2016 1782:2016 1747:talk 1737:See 1720:talk 1705:talk 1677:talk 1663:talk 1648:talk 1633:talk 1618:talk 1604:talk 1475:talk 1460:talk 1450:The 1441:talk 1417:talk 1398:talk 1374:talk 1337:here 1317:talk 1302:talk 1254:talk 1244:per 1215:per 1182:per 1171:talk 1154:talk 1137:talk 1129:bold 1113:talk 1087:Tony 1021:talk 975:talk 959:talk 938:talk 919:talk 896:talk 874:talk 857:talk 843:talk 821:talk 806:talk 791:talk 768:help 751:2016 724:2016 697:2016 656:talk 638:talk 611:talk 580:talk 555:talk 524:talk 508:talk 477:talk 462:talk 448:talk 430:talk 415:talk 401:talk 386:talk 371:talk 343:talk 319:talk 304:talk 289:talk 268:talk 233:talk 216:talk 115:true 1832:Wnt 1743:Wnt 1591:5% 1270:. 1248:.-- 1205:ⱷ≼ 1201:≽ⱷ҅ 1107:). 253:). 152:RfC 129:). 117:or 102:to 1838:) 1802:. 1772:. 1749:) 1722:) 1707:) 1679:) 1665:) 1650:) 1635:) 1620:) 1606:) 1477:) 1462:) 1443:) 1419:) 1400:) 1376:) 1368:. 1345:● 1342:WV 1319:) 1304:) 1256:) 1188:— 1173:) 1156:) 1139:) 1115:) 1083:– 1070:→ 1059:→ 1048:→ 1037:→ 1023:) 1015:— 996:. 977:) 961:) 940:) 921:) 898:) 876:) 859:) 845:) 823:) 808:) 793:) 763:: 761:}} 757:{{ 741:. 714:. 687:. 658:) 640:) 613:) 582:) 561:) 557:• 526:) 510:) 479:) 464:) 450:) 432:) 417:) 403:) 388:) 373:) 349:) 345:• 321:) 306:) 291:) 270:) 235:) 218:) 165:. 160:}} 156:{{ 127:}} 123:{{ 1834:( 1815:. 1784:. 1745:( 1735:: 1731:@ 1718:( 1703:( 1675:( 1661:( 1646:( 1631:( 1616:( 1602:( 1473:( 1458:( 1439:( 1415:( 1396:( 1372:( 1351:✓ 1348:✉ 1315:( 1300:( 1292:( 1252:( 1203:ᴥ 1199:¢ 1196:☏ 1193:☺ 1169:( 1152:( 1135:( 1111:( 1019:( 973:( 957:( 936:( 917:( 894:( 872:( 855:( 841:( 819:( 804:( 789:( 770:) 753:. 726:. 699:. 654:( 636:( 609:( 578:( 553:( 522:( 506:( 475:( 460:( 446:( 428:( 413:( 399:( 384:( 369:( 341:( 317:( 302:( 287:( 266:( 231:( 214:( 197:) 193:( 180:. 173:. 50:.

Index

Talk:Third-party and independent candidates for the 2016 United States presidential election
archive
current talk page
Archive 1
Archive 2
United States third party and independent presidential candidates, 2016
my edit
this simple FaQ
http://web.archive.org/web/20160315171155/http://www.dunham2016.com/
http://www.dunham2016.com/
Sourcecheck
After February 2018
regular verification
have permission
RfC
source check
this tool
this tool
InternetArchiveBot
Report bug
17:12, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Political Boss
talk
18:02, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
User:Dhalsim2
talk
08:00, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
http://ballot-access.org/2016/08/09/reform-party-nominates-rocky-de-la-fuente-for-president/
unsigned
2600:1003:B845:32DC:B081:535C:7B0B:DE51

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.