1012:"While Whitehead believers insist that he was first to fly, no one claims that his work had any effect on early aviation or the development of aeronautic science. Even if someone someday produces a photo of No. 21 in flight on August 14, 1901, it will be nothing more than a footnote, a curious anomaly in the history of aviation." and "Dr. Peter L. Jakab, chairman of the Aeronautics Division at the Smithsonian's National Air and Space Museum (NASM), said in 2005 that the agreement would not stop the Smithsonian from recognizing anyone as inventor of the airplane if indisputable evidence is found: "We would present as accurate a presentation of the history of the invention of the airplane as possible, regardless of the consequences this might incur involving the agreement. Having said that, however, at this time, as in 1948, there is no compelling evidence that Whitehead or anyone else flew before the Wright brothers."" Please find us an eighth grade textbook (which is about the level of detail for this timeline) that is widely accepted and credits Whitehead. That is the sort of level of acceptance necessary here. Rmhermen (talk) 14:12, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
743:"Orville described the final flight of the day: "The first few hundred feet were up and down, as before, but by the time three hundred feet had been covered, the machine was under much better control. The course for the next four or five hundred feet had but little undulation. However, when out about eight hundred feet the machine began pitching again, and, in one of its darts downward, struck the ground. The distance over the ground was measured to be 852 feet (260 m); the time of the flight was 59 seconds. The frame supporting the front rudder was badly broken, but the main part of the machine was not injured at all. We estimated that the machine could be put in condition for flight again in about a day or two." They flew only about ten feet above the ground as a safety precaution, so they had little room to maneuver, and all four flights in the gusty winds ended in a bumpy and unintended "landing".
947:"widely accepted" is not an acceptable basis for articles in wikipedia. "God exists" is widely accepted, in USA and other countries. "Allah exists" is widely accepted in many other countries. But we cannot use what is "widely accepted" in certain parts of the world as basis for Knowledge articles. We must use evidence as the basis for these articles, not popular american myths or beliefs. And your words "comments on the talk page are not required" are difficult to understand. The discussion page for each article is there for discussions about the article. Any big change of the article should be discussed on the discussion page. If you change the article without reasoning for the change on the discussion page you are not following the rules of Knowledge. (Roger Johansson)
747:
vertical vanes (called "blinkers") between the elevators, and gave the wings a very slight dihedral. They disconnected the rudder from the wing-warping control, and as in all future aircraft, placed it on a separate control handle. When flights resumed the results were immediate. The serious pitch instability that hampered Flyers I and II was significantly reduced. Repeated minor crashes were eliminated. Flights with the redesigned Flyer III started lasting over 10 minutes, then 20, then 30. Flyer III became a practical aircraft, flying consistently under full control and bringing its pilot back to the starting point safely and landing without damage. On 5 October 1905, Wilbur flew 24 miles (38.9 km) in 39 minutes 23 seconds.""
1837:, Argentina, flew his "Aeroplano apparatus" glider for a short distance and made no lasting contribution to aeronautics. A native English-speaker might choose to regard it as historically trivial, but it was only the second flight ever in Argentina, so I am sure that to an Argentine aircraft historian it is highly notable. The English Knowledge has come in for some criticism over its lack of respect for non-English material or viewpoints and there are positive efforts to correct that. We appear happy to ascribe notability to such "seconds" in the USA, UK, France and the like, so should we not do so for Argentina as well? — Cheers,
879:
construction fault of the airplane which was the case with all Wright brothers flights before september 1905. They had big problems with keeping the flights horizontal, the plane was going up and down, up and down until it ended in an "unintended landing" and damage to the airplane. A frontal height rudder was simply a bad idea, until modern times when fast computers can adjust small wings at the front of an airplane and they are used on fighter planes. A human cannot control a frontal height rudder fast enough to acheive a stable flight. (Roger
Johansson)
833:"Stanley Yale Beach was the aeronautical editor of Scientific American. A resident of Stratford, he helped finance Whitehead for some time. Beach also designed a Whitehead-built biplane that suffered from a major flaw: its wings were flat, with no curvature, or 'camber.' It never flew despite Whitehead's effort to alleviate Beach's error by installing a cambered monoplane wing behind the flat surfaces. A few excerpts from Beach's reports in Scientific American in 1906 and 1908 contradict Orville's version of Beach's beliefs about Whitehead.
1806:
as important. As for
Phillips, including a vague description of a first attempt at what turned out to be a dead-end in aviation history (the multiplane) seems unnecessarily trivial. His first actual hop in 1907 is certainly notable and that would seem sufficient coverage of his involvement, readers can refer to his article for more details. And yes, the Year in aviation articles are full of excessive trivia (and I'm sure the years after 1915, which I don't watch, are even worse), but that is no reason to add even more.
31:
1393:
plane, instead of approaching him openly. That the
Smithsonian never, during his lifetime or after his death contacted Whitehead or his family. That the Wright brothers denied ever having visited Whitehead in spite of two witnesses who described two visits. That the Smithsonian denied the existence of the contract forbidding them from mentioning Whitehead or any other motorized aviator before the Wright brothers until they were forced to show it.
870:'the largest collection of aeronautical photos in the world'). It was Hammer's exclusive wall, with one exception: six Whitehead photos, including four static views of Whitehead's 1901 monoplane, one of his 1903 engines and the all-important sixth picture-the 'blurred photograph of a large bird-like machine constructed by Whitehead in 1901…of a motor-driven aeroplane in flight,' as described by Beach in Scientific American.'" (Roger Johansson)
983:"Members of the CAHA and the 9315th Squadron went door-to-door in Bridgeport, Fairfield, Stratford, and Milford to track down Whitehead's long-ago neighbors and helpers. They also traced some who had moved to other parts of Connecticut and the United States. Of an estimated 30 persons interviewed for affidavits or on tape, 20 said they had seen flights, eight indicated they had heard of the flights, and two felt that Whitehead did not fly." "
1670:"Whitehead's efforts to solve the problems of flight took their toll on the family budget. Louise Whitehead had to work to help meet expenses. But the couple was able to buy land on Tunis Hill, where, with the help of their son Charles, Whitehead built two homes, in 1903 and in 1912. The two houses still stand. He also planted a large orchard from which he sold fruit, and kept a cow and chickens to help with the family's food supply."
860:'The significance of the foregoing can be appreciated by the fact that Beach's 1939 statement denouncing Whitehead (almost totally at odds with his earlier writings) was quoted by Orville Wright (as shown earlier). Far more important, however, was the Smithsonian's use of the Beach statement as a standard and oft-quoted source for answering queries about aviation's beginnings-because it said that Gustave Whitehead did not fly.'
1728:"O'Dwyer, curious about Howell, spent hours in the Bridgeport Library studying virtually everything Howell wrote. 'Howell was always a very serious writer,' O'Dwyer said. 'He always used sketches rather than photographs with his features on inventions. He was highly regarded by his peers on other local newspapers. He used the florid style of the day, but was not one to exaggerate. Howell later became the Herald's editor.'"
232:
388:
377:
366:
355:
344:
164:
146:
316:
453:
22:
856:
Beach's flat-winged biplane. Angered, Beach broke with
Whitehead and sent a mechanic to Whitehead's shop in Fairfield to disassemble the plane and take it to Beach's barn in Stratford. In later years (in O'Dwyer's words), 'Beach became a politician, rarely missing an opportunity to mingle with the Wright tide that had turned against Whitehead, notably after Whitehead's death in 1927.
250:
82:
64:
260:
1153:
Connecticut, plus senatorial clout and the
Freedom of Information Act, were required to extract a copy of the contract from the Smithsonian. The agreement was dated November 23, 1948. One of two signers for the Wright estate was Harold S. Miller and, "for the United States of America," A. Wetmore, secretary of the Smithsonian Institution." " (Roger Johansson)
842:
would show photographs of their machines in flight to at least partially substantiate their claims.' That barb, according to O'Dwyer, was clearly aimed at the
Wrights, who had been invited to show photographic evidence of their December 17, 1903, flight but refused even to attend the exhibit. 'That famous photo,' O'Dwyer added, 'did not surface until 1908.'
1178:"The Smithsonian denied ever having heard of Whitehead but later it was discovered that the Smithsonian's own publication about early aviator pioneers had many references to both the name Whitehead and Weisskopf. The Smithsonian further reported that Mr. Whitehead's wife and family knew nothing of the August 1901 flights, according to Dr. Jakab.
980:""O'Dwyer, searching through old Bridgeport city directories in the 1970s, found that Andrew Cellie, a Swiss or German immigrant also known as Zulli and Suelli, had moved to the Pittsburgh area in 1902. Meanwhile, Cellie's former neighbors in Fairfield assured O'Dwyer that Cellie had "always claimed he was present when Whitehead flew in 1901.""
1028:"Orville suffered a serious nose-dive crash in the Flyer on July 14, 1905. When rebuilding the airplane, the Wrights made important design changes. .... When testing of Flyer III resumed in September, improvement was immediate. The pitch instability that had hampered Flyers I and II was brought under control. Crashes, some severe, stopped."
757:
the pilot". So september 1905 is the right date for the construction of a fully controllable motorized airplane by the Wright brothers. Note also that the
Whitehead crash in 1899 was not caused by the plane construction, it was caused by a newly erected 3-storey house which Whitehead had not anticipated to be there. (Roger Johansson)
1681:"In a 1940 interview with reporter Michael D'Andrea of the Bridgeport Sunday Post, Louise Whitehead said her husband was always busy with motors and planes when he wasn't working in coal yards or factories to earn money for his aeronautical efforts. "I hated to see him put so much time and money into that work," she said.
1145:""Despite rumors of an agreement between the Smithsonian and the Wright estate, an actual contract remained elusive. O'Dwyer noted that during a 1969 conversation with Paul Garber, then the NASM's curator of early aircraft, Garber denied that any such agreement existed, adding that he "could never agree to such a thing."
1408:
start and landing stretch, and it was stable in the air. The construction itself lends a lot of credibility to the story of
Whitehead's early flights. Somebody said that the construction has a lot in common with modern light and small airplanes. Reproductions of it has been flown and they have been stable in the air.
1805:
As the WP:YEARS project includes sub-articles such as Years in aviation it makes sense to apply that criteria. I don't see that a glider flight (one of probably hundreds by this date) in 1904 by someone who made no mark on the history of aviation (and does not even have his own article) would qualify
1715:
and see how The "aviation historian" Carroll F Gray was the first person in 109 years who questioned that the journalist Dick Howell had written the article about
Whitehead published August 18 1901, and if Howell had made the drawing in the article. (to what purpose he questioned that is a mystery to
1496:
And the only one who bothers to argue for his position is me. Rmhermen and you only refer to what is "widely accepted" or something like that. Do you want wikipedia to represent old widespread but faulty ideas or the closest we can come to the truth based on the evidence we know of? (Roger
Johansson)
1440:
Someone said that the main contribution the Wright brothers did to the development of airplanes in USA was to delay the development with all their litigations and patent fights, and the result of this was that allied pilots, including american pilots, during world war 1 had to use european airplanes
1414:
Whitehead had tried to build 50 airplanes before his nr 21 in 1901, while the Wright brothers built their first glider in 1901, I think, and their first motorized airplane in 1903. So Whitehead had a lot more experience and lay many years ahead of the Wright brothers in his development as an aviation
1407:
The construction of nr 21 and 22: We can see that the plane has a very large wing area well placed around its center, which was the reason why it always landed on its wheels, it worked a little like a parachute. That is also the reason why it lifted off at relatively low speed and needed a very short
531:
list. They can easily become a group of orphan pages unless they link logically into the written text of a whole lot of other articles. The current titles do not lend themselves to easy inclusion in an article's text. At present these pages are difficult to navigate and do not link to each other.
1436:
The Wright brothers airplanes. They looked like no other airplanes before or after them. The choice of a frontal height rudder was a bad idea, nearly impossible to control for a human pilot, that's why they had big pitch problems until a radical re-design in sept 1905. You can hardly call their 260m
1209:
Whitehead's wife did not like his activity in aviation and she had to work outside the home and had to take care of the children, the household and the garden, so she had no time or interest in being present when Whitehead built and flew airplanes. Most wives a hundred years ago, and many today too,
1181:
In a 1940 interview with reporter Michael D'Andrea of the Bridgeport Sunday Post, Louise Whitehead said her husband was always busy with motors and planes when he wasn't working in coal yards or factories to earn money for his aeronautical efforts. "I hated to see him put so much time and money into
1107:
If you insist on the majority view you must use the word God in every sentence in every article in Knowledge, because the majority believes that God controls every thing that happens. Popular american myths can not rule the content of Knowledge, we must base our articles on available evidence.(Roger
1035:
I don't have time to find that quote now, but those words show that their airplanes before september-october 1905 suffered from big problems, and all flights before that date were uncontrolled, resulted in "unintended landings", crashes, and usually damage to the airplane. So it is incorrect to call
841:
The last quote is from a long article by Beach on the first annual exhibit held by the newly formed Aero Club of America at the 69th Regiment Armory in New York City. The report appeared in Scientific American, January 27, 1906. In that issue Beach also wrote, 'It would seem that aeroplane inventors
756:
note that wright flyer 1 and 2 had serious problems with controlling the plane and practically all landings were "unintended" or pure crashes, until sept 1905, when they finally managed to build a plane which, in their own words "would land where we wanted it to land, and without risking the life of
746:
The Wrights continued flying at Huffman Prairie near Dayton in 1904-05. After a severe crash on 14 July 1905, they rebuilt the Flyer and made important design changes. They almost doubled the size of the elevator and rudder and moved them about twice the distance from the wings. They added two fixed
1684:
Mrs. Whitehead said her husband's first words upon returning home from Fairfield on August 14, 1901, were an excited, "Mama, we went up!"" Peter L Jakab did obviously not mention this interview when he said that it was strange that Whitehead had not even mentioned to his wife that he had managed to
1632:
Hello, I'm interested to see how the timeline covering the Pre-WWI period of aviation is being developed. I have a deep and long-term interest in that period of aviation. I also am compelled to correct Roger J.'s characterization of my flyingmachines.org web site as "anti-Whitehead" - it is not and
1577:
I think your version, supported by me, should be left as it is, because we two know a lot more about Whitehead and the mass of evidence supporting it is a lot better than any version written by people who do not have that knowledge. Anybody else who wants to get involved in the Whitehead issue must
1534:
I hope you realize that this issue must be resolved by technically educated people who have read all information in the article about Whitehead and all documents it refers to. If you ask the first hundred randomly selected people you meet on a street in USA you will get the kind of answers Jay Leno
1478:
Thanks very much. Though I have not heard from other editors, I think that I now understand the situation and can offer an opinion. This is a timeline, and thus must give a broad overview of the history of aviation. Like it or not, the consensus of historians is that the Wright Brothers carried out
1392:
The actions of people associated with the Smithsonian have also been very strange, like denying that they had ever heard of Whitehead when they had actually published a book about early aviators where he was mentioned hundreds of times. That Langley secretly sent a spy to take a look at Whitehead's
1148:
Then came, as O'Dwyer expressed it, "a whole new ball game." On June 29, 1975, at an annual dinner meeting of international museum directors at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton, Ohio, CAHA officers overheard a loud argument between Louis Casey, then a NASM curator, and Harold S. Miller, an
869:
William J. Hammer, Thomas A. Edison's chief electrical engineer, was also a renowned aeronautical photographer and a founding member of the Aero Club of America. 'Hammer,' O'Dwyer said, 'reserved an entire wall to show some of his own photographs from a collection (cited by Alexander Graham Bell as
786:
You reverted my well grounded edits of Timeline_of_aviation without a word on the discussion page, and obviously without knowledge of the facts documented in many wikipedia articles about early airplanes. Please engage in a discussion on the discussion page of this article before making any changes
739:
I changed the size vertically to avoid text overlapping. I inserted dates for Whitehead flights, see the wikipedia article about Gustave Whitehead and many other wikipedia articles like first flight, Aviation_history, Early_flight, etc.. including the text in this article under the years 1899, 1901
1755:
What are the notability criteria for these timeline pages? I have seen many historical trivia and dubious claims in these pages, yet I am being reverted for adding an attempted flight which is notable enough to be given space on the designer's page and which was the first powered hop by any of his
1688:
Maybe Mr. Jakab should feel the need to apologize for making that statement when he now knows that Whitehead told his wife about it in the evening of August 14 1901. But remember that Mrs. Whitehead was very uninterested in his work in aviation, in fact she hated to see him invest so much time and
1677:
I hope this explains why I consider your statement "Perhaps the last word in the matter should be left to Gustave Whitehead's wife, Louise Tuba Whitehead, who never recalled seeing her husband fly in his flying machines." one of the most irrational and outrageously confused statements ever made in
1557:
Just to clarify: I am not on R.Johansson's side as he claimed earlier in this discussion. I chose not to get into an edit war with him over inclusion of the Whitehead items, but I have no problem if those items are excluded from the timeline. Also, I do not agree with anything Roger said about the
931:
I quote: ":Not so. I did comment on the article summary - comments on the talk page are not required - and I am well aware of the various claims of a large number of pre-Wright flight claimants. None of them require inclusion in this timeline as none of them - including your candidate - are widely
1400:
Dr. Peter L. Jakab said that his wife had never heard of Whitehead flying, when he should be well aware of her words in an interview: "In a 1940 interview with reporter Michael D'Andrea of the Bridgeport Sunday Post, Louise Whitehead said her husband was always busy with motors and planes when he
1396:
Quote: "O'Dwyer renewed his efforts to obtain a copy of the agreement, which he had long suspected might be a key to NASM's reticence about Whitehead. Letters and visits between O'Dwyer and Senator Lowell Weicker, Jr., of Connecticut, plus senatorial clout and the Freedom of Information Act, were
1384:
The argumentation against Whitehead's achievements reach from devious to outright silly. For example: ""Perhaps the last word in the matter should be left to Gustave Whitehead's wife, Louise Tuba Whitehead, who never recalled seeing her husband fly in his flying machines."" And the text under the
878:
Read also all text on web page: www dot deepsky.com/~firstflight/Pages/article8 dot html It includes witnesses of the 1899 flight in Pittsburgh which ended in a crash when Whitehead failed to fly over a 3-storey house and crashed into the edge of its roof. Note that this crash was not caused by a
837:
Beach's reports referred to powered flights in 1901 by Whitehead in the issues of January 27, November 24 and December 15, 1906, and January 25, 1908. Included were these phrases: 'Whitehead in 1901 and Wright brothers in 1903 have already flown for short distances with motor-powered aeroplanes,'
809:
Not so. I did comment on the article summary - comments on the talk page are not required - and I am well aware of the various claims of a large number of pre-Wright flight claimants. None of them require inclusion in this timeline as none of them - including your candidate - are widely accepted.
1573:
I know you are not on my side, after all the fights we have had over the Gustave Whitehead article, but I chose to accept your version of this timeline even though I don't agree on all details of it. So when it comes to this timeline I have chosen to accept your version, which means that on that
855:
Why did Beach, an enthusiastic supporter of Whitehead who liberally credited Whitehead's powered flight successes of 1901, later become a Wright devotee? O'Dwyer offered some intriguing answers, all reflected by his research files, which state that in 1910 Whitehead refused to work any longer on
1152:
Learning of the public mention of a contract from CAHA veteran Harvey Lippincott, O'Dwyer renewed his efforts to obtain a copy of the agreement, which he had long suspected might be a key to NASM's reticence about Whitehead. Letters and visits between O'Dwyer and Senator Lowell Weicker, Jr., of
1380:
From the documentation we can see that there are at least 25 witnesses to at least four flights by Whitehead during the summer 1901, reaching from 200 to over 2000 meter (1½ miles) in length. The flight witnessed by the journalist from Bridgeport Herald, and other witnesses, was 800 meter. The
1249:
Isn't there a Knowledge guideline against character assassination such as indulged in by Roger J., when he calls Dr. Peter Jakab a "a proven liar and manipulator of history" ? What sanction is there (is there any ?) for an editor behaving like this, casting personal insults and making libelous
850:
Almost a year later, in his report on the second annual exhibit of the Aero Club of America (Scientific American, December 15, 1906), Beach wrote: 'The body framework of Gustave Whitehead's latest bat-like aeroplane was shown mounted on pneumatic tired, ball-bearing wire wheels….Whitehead also
1673:
As Gustave Whitehead used all his time to his aviation experiments Mrs. Whitehead had to take care of the home, their children, work outside the home to support the family economy, take care of the plucking and selling fruit, take care of the cow and the chickens, so how could she witness any
1388:
They argued about the delay of the publishing with a few days, saying "why would a newspaper not publish such a fantastic news item immediately if it was true?" missing, deliberately or not, that the Bridgeport Herald was a weekly newspaper, being distributed every Sunday, and not every day.
986:
That is 21 witnesses in addition to the journalist for Bridgeport Herald and others witnesses who signed sworn affidavits in the 1930's. That is in total around 25 witnesses to Whitehead's flights in 1901. That means we have enough evidence that Whitehead flew a motorized aircraft which was
519:, all of which should be expanded with the information that might appear on these pages. That way all the facts are on one (or a few) page(s) not a hundred pages. As I understand these list pages, they should refer to already written articles, not articles waiting to be written. I know
1080:
I think I have understood it correctly. You could specify more in detail exactly what you think I have misunderstood. But after all, what is important is to try to find the truth, as far as it can be substantiated by evidence, and publish it in an impartial manner. (Roger Johansson)
1735:
I am sorry that this talk page has been invaded by discussions which should have been confined to the Whitehead talk page, but as "the aviation historian" Carroll F Gray has chosen to move this discussion to this talk page I have no alternative but to refute his wild ideas here too.
697:
Is there a way to fix the "year in X" coding so that both can be accomplished? Forcing these changes effectively makes building and maintaining historical timelines useless if only the year can be piped. Somehow, "2006 in sports" isn't very interesting when all the dates are "2006".
1325:
I can accept DonFB's version, a third person arbitrating between you and me, Rmhermen, can you? (sorry for misspelling your signature in the version history, but it is not easy to remember strange signatures when people are not using their real names like I always do) (Roger
1149:
executor of the Wright estate. During the argument, Miller used the word "contract" three times. Casey had mentioned that the wording of the label on the Wright Flyer was to undergo a change. Miller heatedly insisted it could not be changed "by contract." Miller won.
1385:
drawing of nr 21 in the air on an anti-Whitehead web site which says "Imaginative drawing... "suggesting that it never really happened, when the text should have been Sketch by Dick Howell, of Whitehead's airplane in the air, from Bridgeport Herald August 14, 1901.
1611:
You owe Peter L. Jakab a public apology, stated here on this page, as well as asking for forgiveness from the people you've attacked in such a highly partisan manner. If neutrality is supposed to be a guiding principle here, you might try to be guided by it.
1031:
I could quote a lot more evidence if needed, like the words of the Wright brothers in october 1905 to the effect of: We have finally managed to build an airplane which we can land where we want to land it, and without risking the life of the pilot.
1892:
to prevent these articles from eventually drowning in trivial introduction and retirement dates that are meaningless to aviation as a whole; such dates are better placed on the page about the individual airline or military organization.
838:'Whitehead's former bat-like machine with which he made a number of flights in 1901,' 'A single blurred photograph of a large bird-like machine constructed by Whitehead in 1901 was the only photo of a motor-driven aeroplane in flight.'
1887:
operator should be listed. (Vintage aircraft operated by museums, historical societies, and suchlike are excepted; I'm talking about revenue passenger or cargo service, or active military squadron service.) I feel this is warranted by
1284:
I don't know anything about the history of aviation (beyond what I've read here); I'm just an editor who is interested in Knowledge's timeline software, so I'll try to keep an eye on this page, in that capacity. Hope that helps. --
1731:
If the article written by Howell and published August 18 1901 had been different in style or the the drawing had been different from the other drawings he used to accompany his articles Major O'Dwyer should have noticed it.
864:
O'Dwyer also focused his recent reflections on the missing photograph of Whitehead's Airplane No. 21 in apparent flight in 1901-the blurred picture referred to by Stanley Beach in Scientific American, January 27, 1906.
1479:
the first powered flight. Thus my opinion is that Whitehead should not be in the timeline. To state or imply that he came before the Wright Brothers is a fringe point of view and is contrary to Knowledge policy.
1185:
Mrs. Whitehead said her husband's first words upon returning home from Fairfield on August 14, 1901, were an excited, "Mama, we went up!" Mrs. Whitehead, however, said she never saw any of her husband's flights.
1437:
flight in 1903 controlled. It went up and down in the air until the flight ended in a crash into the sand and a broken front rudder. Their flights were not safe or controlled flights until sept-oct 1905.
1756:
designs - he was a major figure in the historical development of the aerofoil and went on to conduct the first powered, controlled flight in the UK. Should I be being reverted, and if so, why? — Cheers,
1608:
A suggestion for Roger J., courtesy and respect will win more consideration of what you are saying than will libelously writing that Peter L. Jakab is a "proven liar" and a "manipulator of history."
1574:
single issue we are in agreement. After all, I know that you know a lot more than most people about Whitehead because you have been active in the editing of the article about him for a long time.
532:
Also, most of the facts are fairly trivial - especially by the 1980's - I would be inclined to merge these pages and move the information to something more appropriate. Alternative thoughts? --
846:
Beach's January 27, 1906, report also noted that'such secrecy was in sharp contrast to the 'free manner' with which glider pioneer Lilienthal 'gave the results of his experiments to the world."
1281:
Regarding sanctions, it is possible to request admin intervention if the editor continues to make personal attacks, but I believe he has been warned elsewhere, and is not likely to continue.
1578:
invest at least 8 hours a day for 10-14 days to read through all the material in the Whitehead article, its discussion page and all the external material it refers to. (Roger Johansson)
2008:
987:
controllable and always landed softly and undamaged on both land and water. More than 4 years before the Wright brothers achieved comparable results in october 1905. (Roger Johansson)
1879:
I would like to build consensus for a new guideline regarding the introduction or retirement of an individual aircraft type: typically, a Year in Aviation page should only discuss the
1381:
journalist was always truthful and his drawings were always very good, this was checked by O'Dwyer. That journalist, Dick Howell, later became chief editor for the newspaper.
1988:
1142:
Other people working for the Smithsonian have also been discredited as liars, and they have done all they could to keep the contract secret, until they were forced to show it.
1196:""Perhaps the last word in the matter should be left to Gustave Whitehead's wife, Louise Tuba Whitehead, who never recalled seeing her husband fly in his flying machines.""
720:
I'm not sure of the usefulness of this entry - there will always be a largest/fastest/longest/smallest etc aircraft, but should they be in a timeline? Just a thought. --
1674:
flights? She also hated her husband's great investment of time and money in the aviation experiments, so her motivation in witnessing any flights was obviously nil.
523:
made an attempt with the years 1980-1987, but they are really timelines that would be better pulled into one article. The current pages all stem from one article (
1210:
have other things to do than following their husbands and witness their work. So this way of trying to discredit Whitehead's achievements is astonishingly silly.
1993:
1401:
wasn't working in coal yards or factories to earn money for his aeronautical efforts. "I hated to see him put so much time and money into that work," she said.
329:
315:
905:
Replaced the citations and references needed tag with an explanation. Fixed the links in the diagram so they really work when clicked upon. (Roger Johansson)
1978:
1926:
Agreed, especially since some military aircraft programs have included ambiguous "pre-production" or "trials" versions that never actually entered service.
1770:
Oh, and all those minor claims, varying from the historically trivial but verifiable to the highly dubious, they pepper all sorts of other lists too. Where
2038:
2003:
1983:
1519:
Actually third opinions are for situations in which two editors are involved. I suggest a content RfC to get a broader array of opinions on this issue.
122:
1134:
Your reference to Dr. Peter L. Jakab, chairman of the Aeronautics Division at the Smithsonian's National Air and Space Museum (NASM), is a big mistake.
851:
exhibited the 2-cylinder steam engine which revolved the road wheels of his former bat machine, with which he made a number of short flights in 1901.'
2018:
1973:
208:
1716:
me but feel free to ask him about it). To refute his idea that somebody else had written that article and had made the drawing I can refer to this:
35:
2033:
214:
128:
2028:
504:
1585:
1542:
1504:
1448:
1422:
1404:
Mrs. Whitehead said her husband's first words upon returning home from Fairfield on August 14, 1901, were an excited, "Mama, we went up!""
1333:
1265:
1233:
1217:
1160:
1115:
1088:
1052:
994:
954:
912:
886:
794:
764:
2023:
590:
1998:
1968:
1362:
2013:
1303:
Thank you very much. Let's hope that sort of comment and personal attack disappear so it won't need to be pushed to a higher level.
290:
830:
Read this and the pages after and before it at www dot historynet.com/gustave-whitehead-and-the-first-flight-controversy dot htm/8
464:
184:
98:
483:
I would advise against the phrase "Partial list of events that had an impact in aviation" that is used on some of these pages.
272:
237:
1793:
is vague, though I have attempted to establish more specific guidelines. At present it only states that the events section
1268:, and they stated that all personal attacks may be deleted. I've replaced the specific instances above, with the template
1202:
1189:
1137:
633:
1883:
airline or military air arm to introduce an aircraft type into active service, and similarly, only its retirement by the
568:
44:
1493:
This doesn't solve the issue. Now we are two against two, you and Rmhermen on one side and me and DonFB on the other.
180:
176:
171:
151:
89:
69:
1723:
1665:
1415:
engineer. So it is natural that he succeeded before them, and built a stable and safe airplane 4 years before them.
674:
piped year links should not be used when the date is a full date, including the day and the month, because it stops
277:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
654:
is removing the "XXXX in aviation" links. Has there been any decision to do so or is it doing something unwanted?
1638:
1617:
1310:
1255:
1199:
The above quote is a silly attempt to discredit Whitehead, taken from www dot flyingmachines.org/gwhtd dot html.
1889:
1589:
1546:
1508:
1452:
1426:
1337:
1237:
1221:
1164:
1119:
1092:
1048:
998:
958:
916:
890:
798:
768:
278:
594:
1917:
1524:
1484:
1356:
516:
1044:
1949:
1931:
1898:
1860:
1852:
1842:
1824:
1816:
1779:
1761:
1741:
1702:
1694:
1369:. To assist with the process, editors are requested to summarize the dispute in a short sentence below.
703:
580:
512:
50:
675:
1634:
1613:
1581:
1538:
1500:
1444:
1418:
1329:
1306:
1251:
1229:
1213:
1156:
1111:
1084:
1040:
990:
950:
908:
882:
790:
760:
669:
586:
740:
and 1902. I changed and added information about the Wright brothers planes, supported by this text:
1834:
469:
97:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1689:
money into it, so he probably did not go into detail about the events of that day with his wife.
1290:
1070:
937:
815:
610:
520:
1944:
I think Carguychris suggestion seems reasonable to base entries related to a type not operator.
1411:
So there is no technical reason to doubt the over 25 witnesses who say they saw Whitehead fly.
1913:
1712:
1520:
1480:
1352:
1175:
974:
725:
627:
533:
1945:
1927:
1894:
1856:
1838:
1820:
1775:
1757:
1737:
1698:
1690:
1022:
699:
684:
545:
541:
508:
1790:
1563:
1366:
668:
Please note that the bot only removes piped links to "years in aviation" from full dates.
560:
284:
265:
751:
651:
488:
1962:
1286:
1066:
933:
811:
572:
1272:
1062:
721:
620:
619:
Those are labled at the right side -- "space race", "wwii", etc. Could be better.
1724:
http://www.historynet.com/gustave-whitehead-and-the-first-flight-controversy.htm/5
1666:
http://www.historynet.com/gustave-whitehead-and-the-first-flight-controversy.htm/9
249:
231:
1912:
dates are too open to interpretation and the deliveries would be more precise.--
680:
1953:
1935:
1921:
1902:
1864:
1846:
1828:
1810:
1783:
1765:
1745:
1706:
1642:
1621:
1593:
1567:
1550:
1528:
1512:
1488:
1456:
1430:
1341:
1314:
1294:
1259:
1241:
1168:
1123:
1096:
1074:
1002:
962:
941:
920:
894:
819:
802:
772:
729:
707:
688:
662:
640:
613:
598:
452:
1559:
659:
557:
255:
459:
163:
145:
1654:
1875:
Service introductions and retirements on individual Year in Aviation pages
540:
It would be good to know if there are firm plans to put content on, e.g.
524:
500:
496:
609:
What is the significance of the four yellow sections of the timeline? --
1833:
To take a current example on the "trivia" side: in 1904 in Argentina,
81:
63:
1789:
I know of no specific criteria for Year in aviation articles. Even
1397:
required to extract a copy of the contract from the Smithsonian."
94:
556:, which are heavily-accessed year pages, but contain no content.
553:
549:
447:
15:
314:
183:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
1266:
Knowledge:Editor_assistance/Requests#Timeline_of_aviation
655:
401:
1711:
You can also study the discussion page of the article
1685:
fly, and this was also used to discredit Whitehead.
752:
http://www.aviationexplorer.com/aviation_history.html
487:
is not exactly considered desirable in aviation .. --
458:
A fact from this article was featured on Knowledge's
1855:. Any contributions would be appreciated. — Cheers,
93:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
326:
1441:because there were no american planes available.
1250:statements about a person ? I would like to know.
327:This article has not yet been checked against the
213:This article has not yet received a rating on the
127:This article has not yet received a rating on the
1851:The discussion on Guido Dinelli is continuing at
1036:their 1903 flights controlled. (Roger Johansson)
1819:because they are more relevant there. — Cheers,
1009:More to the point quotes from Whitehead article:
567:Why were large numbers of comments dropped when
2009:List-Class Years articles of Unknown-importance
678:working. For example, do not write ] ] or ], ].
1817:Talk:1904 in aviation#Phillips 1904 multiplane
1815:I copied your comments on Phillips across to
427:assessing the article against each criterion.
8:
1989:Knowledge level-5 vital articles in History
175:, an attempt to structure and organize all
1065:but you don't seem to have understood it.
579:Your timeline is incomplete. It must have
495:Wouldn't this page be better set out as a
423:| b5<!--Supporting materials    --: -->
419:| b4<!--Grammar and style       --: -->
415:| b3<!--Structure               --: -->
411:| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy   --: -->
407:| b1<!--Referencing and citation--: -->
323:
226:
140:
58:
21:
19:
1655:http://www.flyingmachines.org/gwhtd.html
404:the following code to the template call:
271:This article is within the scope of the
179:. If you wish to help, please visit the
1649:The "aviation historian" Carroll F Gray
228:
142:
60:
289:. To use this banner, please see the
505:Timeline of transportation technology
7:
1994:List-Class vital articles in History
169:This article is within the scope of
87:This article is within the scope of
1979:Knowledge vital articles in History
1853:Talk:1904 in aviation#Guido Dinelli
548:and the others. They now link from
400:To fill out this checklist, please
49:It is of interest to the following
2039:Selected anniversaries (June 2004)
1697:) 12:37, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
14:
2004:Unknown-importance Years articles
1984:List-Class level-5 vital articles
1660:Mrs. Whitehead, a very busy woman
1535:usually gets. (Roger Johansson)
2019:Unknown-importance List articles
1974:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
787:to it again. (Roger Johansson)
451:
386:
375:
364:
353:
342:
258:
248:
230:
162:
144:
80:
62:
29:
20:
507:? Besides there is already a
1746:13:06, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
1707:12:37, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
1653:You can study his web page at
1601:Viewpoint by (Carroll F. Gray)
1373:Viewpoint by (Roger Johansson)
527:) and as a single link in the
299:Knowledge:WikiProject Aviation
1:
2034:WikiProject Aviation articles
1847:16:49, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
1829:20:57, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
1811:10:50, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
1784:10:34, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
1766:10:22, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
1643:09:52, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
1633:neither is it pro-Whitehead.
1622:04:18, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
1471:Third opinion by Figureofnine
1315:04:24, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
1295:20:12, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
1260:10:04, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
1224:) 17:13, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
302:Template:WikiProject Aviation
101:and see a list of open tasks.
2029:List-Class aviation articles
1865:09:06, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
1774:we draw the line? — Cheers,
1628:Auditing, for the time being
708:01:06, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
689:17:35, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
663:14:34, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
569:Timeline of aviation history
1594:13:25, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
1568:07:54, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
1551:22:05, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
1529:21:22, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
1513:21:11, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
1489:19:14, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
1457:17:18, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
1431:18:57, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
1342:05:11, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
1242:16:50, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
1169:15:42, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
1124:15:07, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
1097:14:55, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
1075:14:18, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
1003:13:28, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
963:13:31, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
716:Largest commercial airliner
641:23:30, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
614:03:24, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
571:was merged into this page?
193:Knowledge:WikiProject Lists
107:Knowledge:WikiProject Years
2055:
2024:WikiProject Lists articles
1954:07:47, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
1936:13:51, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
1922:06:12, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
1903:18:32, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
1678:the history of mankind.
942:17:16, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
921:03:47, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
895:00:29, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
820:17:16, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
803:21:32, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
575:03:38, Apr 30, 2004 (UTC)
347:Referencing and citation:
215:project's importance scale
196:Template:WikiProject Lists
129:project's importance scale
110:Template:WikiProject Years
1999:List-Class Years articles
1969:List-Class vital articles
773:02:32, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
676:readers' date preferences
563:14:57, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)
243:
212:
157:
126:
75:
57:
2014:List-Class List articles
1463:Viewpoint by (name here)
730:07:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
536:10:56 19 Jul 2003 (UTC)
491:09:54 19 Jul 2003 (UTC)
1203:Personal attack removed
1190:Personal attack removed
1138:Personal attack removed
927:Widely accepted, in USA
672:specifically says that
599:01:18, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
358:Coverage and accuracy:
177:list pages on Knowledge
1802:
1264:I asked what to do at
1182:that work," she said.
583:flight in Paris 1906.
517:Milestones in Aviation
391:Supporting materials:
319:
1794:
1719:O'Dwyer about Howell
1017:Wright flyer problems
581:Alberto Santos-Dumont
513:Incidents in Aviation
511:article, as well as
318:
36:level-5 vital article
1800:events that occurred
670:Knowledge:Piped link
503:? Or merge it with
274:Aviation WikiProject
1365:) wants to offer a
1321:Building a consesus
1226:(Roger Johansson)
969:Whitehead witnesses
380:Grammar and style:
333:for B-class status:
1908:Also, the current
1130:Dr. Peter L. Jakab
1061:You may have read
779:Reverting my edits
647:Bot removing links
320:
45:content assessment
1890:WP:INDISCRIMINATE
1713:Gustave Whitehead
1584:comment added by
1558:Wright brothers.
1541:comment added by
1503:comment added by
1447:comment added by
1421:comment added by
1332:comment added by
1232:comment added by
1216:comment added by
1206:
1193:
1176:Gustave Whitehead
1159:comment added by
1141:
1114:comment added by
1087:comment added by
1057:
1043:comment added by
993:comment added by
975:Gustave_Whitehead
953:comment added by
911:comment added by
885:comment added by
793:comment added by
763:comment added by
706:
639:
589:comment added by
479:Early discussions
476:
475:
446:
445:
442:
441:
438:
437:
434:
433:
424:= <yes/no: -->
420:= <yes/no: -->
416:= <yes/no: -->
412:= <yes/no: -->
408:= <yes/no: -->
305:aviation articles
291:full instructions
225:
224:
221:
220:
172:WikiProject Lists
139:
138:
135:
134:
90:WikiProject Years
2046:
1809:
1596:
1553:
1515:
1459:
1433:
1344:
1277:
1271:
1244:
1225:
1200:
1187:
1171:
1135:
1126:
1099:
1056:
1037:
1023:Wright_Flyer_III
1005:
965:
923:
897:
805:
775:
735:Relevant changes
702:
623:
601:
546:1993 in aviation
542:1991 in aviation
509:Aviation history
455:
448:
428:
394:
390:
389:
383:
379:
378:
372:
368:
367:
361:
357:
356:
350:
346:
345:
324:
307:
306:
303:
300:
297:
268:
263:
262:
261:
252:
245:
244:
234:
227:
201:
200:
197:
194:
191:
166:
159:
158:
148:
141:
115:
114:
111:
108:
105:
84:
77:
76:
66:
59:
42:
33:
32:
25:
24:
23:
16:
2054:
2053:
2049:
2048:
2047:
2045:
2044:
2043:
1959:
1958:
1877:
1808:DerbyCountyinNZ
1807:
1753:
1662:
1651:
1635:Carroll F. Gray
1630:
1614:Carroll F. Gray
1579:
1536:
1498:
1442:
1416:
1350:
1327:
1323:
1307:Carroll F. Gray
1275:
1269:
1252:Carroll F. Gray
1227:
1211:
1154:
1132:
1109:
1105:
1082:
1038:
1019:
988:
971:
948:
929:
906:
903:
880:
876:
828:
788:
781:
758:
737:
718:
649:
607:
584:
481:
399:
392:
387:
381:
376:
370:
365:
359:
354:
348:
343:
304:
301:
298:
295:
294:
266:Aviation portal
264:
259:
257:
198:
195:
192:
189:
188:
112:
109:
106:
103:
102:
43:on Knowledge's
40:
30:
12:
11:
5:
2052:
2050:
2042:
2041:
2036:
2031:
2026:
2021:
2016:
2011:
2006:
2001:
1996:
1991:
1986:
1981:
1976:
1971:
1961:
1960:
1957:
1956:
1941:
1940:
1939:
1938:
1876:
1873:
1872:
1871:
1870:
1869:
1868:
1867:
1831:
1803:
1752:
1749:
1661:
1658:
1650:
1647:
1646:
1629:
1626:
1625:
1606:
1605:
1602:
1598:
1586:87.249.177.148
1571:
1570:
1543:87.249.177.148
1532:
1531:
1505:87.249.177.148
1476:
1475:
1472:
1468:
1467:
1464:
1449:87.249.177.148
1423:87.249.177.148
1378:
1377:
1374:
1349:
1346:
1334:87.249.177.148
1322:
1319:
1318:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1282:
1279:
1246:
1234:87.249.177.148
1218:87.249.177.148
1161:87.249.177.148
1131:
1128:
1116:87.249.177.148
1104:
1101:
1089:87.249.177.148
1078:
1077:
1045:87.249.177.148
1018:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1010:
995:87.249.177.148
970:
967:
955:87.249.177.148
928:
925:
913:87.249.177.148
902:
899:
887:87.249.177.148
875:
872:
868:
863:
859:
854:
849:
845:
836:
827:
824:
823:
822:
795:87.249.177.148
783:To Rmhermen:
780:
777:
765:87.249.177.148
736:
733:
717:
714:
713:
712:
711:
710:
692:
691:
648:
645:
644:
643:
606:
603:
577:
565:
538:
493:
480:
477:
474:
473:
456:
444:
443:
440:
439:
436:
435:
432:
431:
429:
426:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
397:
396:
395:
384:
373:
362:
351:
337:
336:
334:
321:
311:
310:
308:
270:
269:
253:
241:
240:
235:
223:
222:
219:
218:
211:
205:
204:
202:
167:
155:
154:
149:
137:
136:
133:
132:
125:
119:
118:
116:
113:Years articles
99:the discussion
85:
73:
72:
67:
55:
54:
48:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2051:
2040:
2037:
2035:
2032:
2030:
2027:
2025:
2022:
2020:
2017:
2015:
2012:
2010:
2007:
2005:
2002:
2000:
1997:
1995:
1992:
1990:
1987:
1985:
1982:
1980:
1977:
1975:
1972:
1970:
1967:
1966:
1964:
1955:
1951:
1947:
1943:
1942:
1937:
1933:
1929:
1925:
1924:
1923:
1919:
1915:
1911:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1904:
1900:
1896:
1891:
1886:
1882:
1874:
1866:
1862:
1858:
1854:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1844:
1840:
1836:
1835:Guido Dinelli
1832:
1830:
1826:
1822:
1818:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1804:
1801:
1799:
1792:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1781:
1777:
1773:
1768:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1750:
1748:
1747:
1743:
1739:
1733:
1729:
1726:
1725:
1720:
1717:
1714:
1709:
1708:
1704:
1700:
1696:
1692:
1686:
1682:
1679:
1675:
1671:
1668:
1667:
1659:
1657:
1656:
1648:
1645:
1644:
1640:
1636:
1627:
1624:
1623:
1619:
1615:
1609:
1603:
1600:
1599:
1597:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1575:
1569:
1565:
1561:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1552:
1548:
1544:
1540:
1530:
1526:
1522:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1514:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1494:
1491:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1473:
1470:
1469:
1465:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1458:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1438:
1434:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1412:
1409:
1405:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1375:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1368:
1367:third opinion
1364:
1361:
1358:
1354:
1348:Third opinion
1347:
1345:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1331:
1320:
1317:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1283:
1280:
1274:
1267:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1248:
1247:
1245:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1207:
1204:
1197:
1194:
1191:
1183:
1179:
1177:
1172:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1150:
1146:
1143:
1139:
1129:
1127:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1103:Majority view
1102:
1100:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1033:
1029:
1026:
1024:
1016:
1011:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1004:
1000:
996:
992:
984:
981:
978:
976:
968:
966:
964:
960:
956:
952:
945:
943:
939:
935:
926:
924:
922:
918:
914:
910:
901:Several fixes
900:
898:
896:
892:
888:
884:
873:
871:
866:
861:
857:
852:
847:
843:
839:
834:
831:
825:
821:
817:
813:
808:
807:
806:
804:
800:
796:
792:
784:
778:
776:
774:
770:
766:
762:
754:
753:
748:
744:
741:
734:
732:
731:
727:
723:
715:
709:
705:
701:
696:
695:
694:
693:
690:
686:
682:
679:
677:
671:
667:
666:
665:
664:
661:
657:
653:
646:
642:
638:
635:
634:contributions
632:
629:
626:
622:
618:
617:
616:
615:
612:
604:
602:
600:
596:
592:
591:201.13.72.131
588:
582:
576:
574:
570:
564:
562:
559:
555:
551:
547:
543:
537:
535:
530:
526:
522:
521:AntonioMartin
518:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
492:
490:
486:
478:
471:
470:June 29, 2004
467:
466:
461:
457:
454:
450:
449:
430:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
405:
403:
398:
385:
374:
363:
352:
341:
340:
339:
338:
335:
332:
331:
325:
322:
317:
313:
312:
309:
292:
288:
287:
282:
281:
276:
275:
267:
256:
254:
251:
247:
246:
242:
239:
236:
233:
229:
216:
210:
207:
206:
203:
199:List articles
186:
182:
178:
174:
173:
168:
165:
161:
160:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
130:
124:
121:
120:
117:
100:
96:
92:
91:
86:
83:
79:
78:
74:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
37:
27:
18:
17:
1914:Marc Lacoste
1909:
1884:
1880:
1878:
1797:
1795:
1771:
1769:
1754:
1734:
1730:
1727:
1721:
1718:
1710:
1687:
1683:
1680:
1676:
1672:
1669:
1663:
1652:
1631:
1610:
1607:
1576:
1572:
1533:
1521:Figureofnine
1495:
1492:
1481:Figureofnine
1477:
1439:
1435:
1413:
1410:
1406:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1359:
1353:Figureofnine
1351:
1324:
1305:
1302:
1208:
1198:
1195:
1184:
1180:
1173:
1151:
1147:
1144:
1133:
1108:Johansson)
1106:
1079:
1034:
1030:
1027:
1021:Quotes from
1020:
985:
982:
979:
972:
946:
930:
904:
877:
867:
862:
858:
853:
848:
844:
840:
835:
832:
829:
785:
782:
755:
749:
745:
742:
738:
719:
673:
650:
636:
630:
624:
608:
578:
566:
539:
534:kiwiinapanic
528:
494:
484:
482:
463:
328:
285:
279:
273:
181:project page
170:
88:
51:WikiProjects
34:
1946:MilborneOne
1928:Carguychris
1895:Carguychris
1857:Steelpillow
1839:Steelpillow
1821:Steelpillow
1776:Steelpillow
1758:Steelpillow
1738:Roger491127
1699:Roger491127
1691:Roger491127
1580:—Preceding
1537:—Preceding
1499:—Preceding
1443:—Preceding
1417:—Preceding
1328:—Preceding
1228:—Preceding
1212:—Preceding
1174:Quote from
1155:—Preceding
1110:—Preceding
1083:—Preceding
1039:—Preceding
989:—Preceding
973:Quote from
949:—Preceding
907:—Preceding
881:—Preceding
874:More quotes
789:—Preceding
759:—Preceding
700:Askari Mark
585:—Preceding
529:"See Also:"
468:section on
465:On this day
393:not checked
382:not checked
371:not checked
369:Structure:
360:not checked
349:not checked
286:task forces
1963:Categories
1910:production
1881:very first
1796:lists any
1751:Notability
1326:Johansson)
932:accepted.
558:Pete/Pcb21
280:open tasks
185:discussion
41:List-class
1885:very last
1798:important
652:Jogersbot
489:Eloquence
460:Main Page
39:is rated
1791:WP:YEARS
1582:unsigned
1539:unsigned
1501:unsigned
1445:unsigned
1419:unsigned
1363:contribs
1330:unsigned
1287:Quiddity
1230:unsigned
1214:unsigned
1157:unsigned
1112:unsigned
1085:unsigned
1067:Rmhermen
1053:contribs
1041:unsigned
991:unsigned
951:unsigned
934:Rmhermen
909:unsigned
883:unsigned
812:Rmhermen
791:unsigned
761:unsigned
587:unsigned
573:Rmhermen
525:Aviation
501:Aviation
497:Timeline
330:criteria
296:Aviation
238:Aviation
722:TraceyR
621:Tlogmer
605:Yellow?
462:in the
1664:From:
826:Quotes
704:(Talk)
681:Jogers
611:Keeves
561:(talk)
485:Impact
47:scale.
1722:from
1560:DonFB
1063:WP:OR
750:from
660:MoRsE
190:Lists
152:Lists
104:Years
95:Years
70:Years
28:This
1950:talk
1932:talk
1918:talk
1899:talk
1861:Talk
1843:Talk
1825:Talk
1780:Talk
1762:Talk
1742:talk
1703:talk
1695:talk
1639:talk
1618:talk
1604:....
1590:talk
1564:talk
1547:talk
1525:talk
1509:talk
1485:talk
1474:....
1466:....
1453:talk
1427:talk
1376:....
1357:talk
1338:talk
1311:talk
1291:talk
1256:talk
1238:talk
1222:talk
1165:talk
1120:talk
1093:talk
1071:talk
1049:talk
999:talk
959:talk
938:talk
917:talk
891:talk
816:talk
799:talk
769:talk
726:talk
685:talk
656:diff
628:talk
595:talk
554:1993
552:and
550:1991
544:and
515:and
283:and
1273:RPA
499:of
402:add
209:???
123:???
1965::
1952:)
1934:)
1920:)
1901:)
1863:)
1845:)
1827:)
1782:)
1772:do
1764:)
1744:)
1705:)
1641:)
1620:)
1592:)
1566:)
1549:)
1527:)
1511:)
1487:)
1455:)
1429:)
1340:)
1313:)
1293:)
1276:}}
1270:{{
1258:)
1240:)
1167:)
1122:)
1095:)
1073:)
1055:)
1051:•
1025::
1001:)
977::
961:)
944:"
940:)
919:)
893:)
818:)
801:)
771:)
728:)
687:)
658:--
597:)
1948:(
1930:(
1916:(
1897:(
1859:(
1841:(
1823:(
1778:(
1760:(
1740:(
1701:(
1693:(
1637:(
1616:(
1588:(
1562:(
1545:(
1523:(
1507:(
1483:(
1451:(
1425:(
1360:·
1355:(
1336:(
1309:(
1289:(
1278:.
1254:(
1236:(
1220:(
1205:)
1201:(
1192:)
1188:(
1163:(
1140:)
1136:(
1118:(
1091:(
1069:(
1047:(
997:(
957:(
936:(
915:(
889:(
814:(
797:(
767:(
724:(
683:(
637:)
631:/
625:(
593:(
472:.
293:.
217:.
187:.
131:.
53::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
