610:
fluency in the fields referred to in this article. At the top of the list of what I'm thinking about is linear algebra, followed by transforms (e.g LaPlace) followed by a few electrical/electronic technical principles and other technical principles closely related to that. IMHO, for that appropriate reader, the ideal article would "teach" the topic, or lead them to an understanding of it. IMHO while this article provides a lot of information and concepts about the topic, it doesn't do that. IMHO, for articles in
Knowledge on abstract and difficult to "teach" topics, this is the Knowledge norm, and so not a reason to fail the article. So, my question to you is: do you prefer that I pass the the article now,, or would you wish to enter into an interactive / joint effOrt and somewhat "critiquing" process to get it closer to or to what IMHO I described? So, if you'd rather not do that, or disagree with what I described, I will pass the article now. If we enter into that process, and you later decide that process, or you decide that you disagree with me, then I will pas the article then. Either way is 100% fine for this article which IMHO meets Knowledge Good Article standards as it is today. Sincerely,
638:. I am for making articles easily understandable, but it is problematic to try and explain everything that a reader may want explaining. The problem is where does one stop? To understand Laplace transforms, for instance, one must first have an understanding of calculus. To understand calculus one must first have an understanding of basic algebra. To understand algebra, one must first have an understanding of the operations of arithmetic, and to understand that, one must first master the principles of counting. To say nothing of Fourier analysis, complex numbers, phasors, and graphing a function, all of which would usually be taught as a preliminary before tackling Laplace transforms. To
336:
326:
305:
203:
182:
279:
643:
the credit that they know what they are doing when they typed that topic into the search box and give them the information on that topic. We cannot reasonably put all the preliminary material in every article that mentions
Laplace transfoms, but we can give links to appropriate pages if the reader need to understand an unfamiliar term. In much the same way, a textbook might refer back to a previous chapter on a topic already covered.
213:
21:
151:
134:
75:
425:
609:
Question: I have finished enough of a review of this article to determine that, as is, I would pass it as a Good
Article. As I mentioned, I'm always thinking with particular concern / empathy for an appropriate reader. In this case I think that that would be a person with some knowledge about but not
659:
Cool. I probably should have only used the word "inform" without "teach"; the latter covers lots of possibilities....IMO depending on the details some of which fall under "inform / explain" and some of which fall under what
Knowledge isn't. I'm going to pass the article (may take a couple days to
642:
a subject, one starts with the fundamentals and then builds upon them with ever more advanced topics. Knowledge articles, of necessity, cannot work like that. We cannot force readers to read the subject matter in a prescribed order. The correct approach, in my opinion, is to first give the reader
629:
I'm happy to take part in improving the article and making it more accessible. However, if your comments are extensive, and not directly covered by the GA criteria, then it would probably be best to do this as a separate exercise outside the GA process. I have to take issue with your claim that an
532:) 02:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC) I try to be "middle of the road" regarding being tough or easy. One area where I'm a bit tougher than average is empathy for a typical reader, but I think that that helps the article. :-) Sincerely,
551:
Hello North8000, thank you for reviewing. That is a sensible question to ask, it is very annoying when people nominate an article but don't, or can't, take part in the review. Rest assured you will get prompt responses from me.
519:
Hello, I started a GA review of this article. One question I always like to ask early is: is there an editor who could / would be involved in the GA review process on behalf of the article? Sincerely,
392:
126:
430:
32:
927:
463:
435:
453:
947:
287:
115:
962:
382:
942:
932:
269:
259:
122:
957:
358:
952:
46:
937:
864:
Congratulations, this passes as a
Knowledge Good Article. I have "duplicated" this here for when the review is no longer transcluded.
888:
481:
349:
310:
53:
922:
502:
458:
38:
892:
226:
187:
162:
904:
106:
649:
558:
787:
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
477:
218:
20:
631:
168:
90:
335:
900:
873:
850:
826:
801:
776:
751:
726:
701:
669:
619:
595:
577:
541:
529:
496:
357:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
644:
553:
341:
325:
304:
74:
42:
660:
handle the details) and perhaps some discussions after that might be of interest. Sincerely,
278:
235:
202:
181:
568:
Cool! I got a fast start on the easy stuff, I'll be a bit slower on the next stages.
492:
111:
916:
908:
877:
854:
830:
805:
780:
762:
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each
755:
730:
705:
673:
654:
623:
599:
581:
563:
545:
506:
95:
630:"ideal article would 'teach' the topic". That is in direct contradiction of the
354:
331:
208:
85:
692:
Passes this criteria. IMO meets the
Knowledge norm for a GA of this type.
636:"The purpose of Knowledge is to present facts, not to teach subject matter"
484:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
817:
Has 4 images. One is public domain and three have suitable licensing.
897:
there has been no substantive alterations to the article since rating
231:
860:
Congratulations, this article passes as a
Knowledge Good Article
144:
69:
15:
277:
132:
841:
Congratulations, this passes as a
Knowledge Good Article.
127:
Template:Did you know nominations/Transfer function matrix
837:
Congratulations, this passes as a
Knowledge Good Article
896:
59:
125:. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
353:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
114:was on development of gas turbine engines for the
45:. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
8:
230:, which collaborates on articles related to
116:National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics
413:
299:
176:
98:). The text of the entry was as follows:
928:Engineering and technology good articles
123:Knowledge:Recent additions/2017/February
33:Engineering and technology good articles
444:
416:
301:
178:
121:A record of the entry may be seen at
7:
586:Still working, I haven't gone away.
347:This article is within the scope of
286:This article is within the field of
224:This article is within the scope of
150:
148:
812:Illustrated, if possible, by images
167:It is of interest to the following
948:Systems articles in control theory
887:I've updated the ratings for both
14:
963:Low-priority mathematics articles
712:Factually accurate and verifiable
482:Talk:Transfer function matrix/GA1
367:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics
133:
41:. If you can improve it further,
370:Template:WikiProject Mathematics
334:
324:
303:
211:
201:
180:
149:
73:
19:
943:Mid-importance Systems articles
933:Knowledge Did you know articles
387:This article has been rated as
264:This article has been rated as
29:has been listed as one of the
1:
958:GA-Class mathematics articles
831:00:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
806:02:42, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
781:01:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
756:21:26, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
674:17:10, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
655:15:18, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
624:01:40, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
600:13:03, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
582:18:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
564:15:00, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
546:02:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
507:00:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
361:and see a list of open tasks.
244:Knowledge:WikiProject Systems
953:WikiProject Systems articles
883:GA rating updated on banners
247:Template:WikiProject Systems
104:... that the first use of a
94:column on 13 February 2017 (
682:GA criteria final checklist
979:
270:project's importance scale
938:GA-Class Systems articles
878:23:51, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
855:23:50, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
731:23:48, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
706:23:46, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
386:
319:
285:
263:
196:
175:
909:14:02, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
393:project's priority scale
107:transfer function matrix
84:appeared on Knowledge's
82:Transfer function matrix
27:Transfer function matrix
923:Knowledge good articles
889:WikiProject Mathematics
350:WikiProject Mathematics
792:Passes this criteria.
767:Passes this criteria.
717:Passes this criteria.
282:
219:Systems science portal
157:This article is rated
138:
742:Passes this criteria
737:Broad in its coverage
281:
136:
39:good article criteria
373:mathematics articles
893:WikiProject Systems
227:WikiProject Systems
895:to "GA-class", as
342:Mathematics portal
283:
163:content assessment
139:
57:: March 2, 2017. (
472:
471:
407:
406:
403:
402:
399:
398:
298:
297:
294:
293:
143:
142:
68:
67:
64:
970:
870:
847:
823:
798:
773:
748:
723:
698:
666:
637:
616:
592:
574:
538:
526:
426:Copyvio detector
414:
375:
374:
371:
368:
365:
344:
339:
338:
328:
321:
320:
315:
307:
300:
252:
251:
250:Systems articles
248:
245:
242:
221:
216:
215:
214:
205:
198:
197:
192:
184:
177:
160:
154:
153:
152:
145:
135:
77:
70:
62:
60:Reviewed version
51:
23:
16:
978:
977:
973:
972:
971:
969:
968:
967:
913:
912:
901:Sasuke Sarutobi
885:
866:
862:
843:
839:
819:
814:
794:
789:
769:
764:
744:
739:
719:
714:
694:
689:
684:
662:
635:
612:
588:
570:
534:
522:
517:
476:This review is
468:
440:
412:
372:
369:
366:
363:
362:
340:
333:
313:
249:
246:
243:
240:
239:
236:systems science
217:
212:
210:
190:
161:on Knowledge's
158:
112:control systems
58:
12:
11:
5:
976:
974:
966:
965:
960:
955:
950:
945:
940:
935:
930:
925:
915:
914:
884:
881:
861:
858:
838:
835:
834:
833:
813:
810:
809:
808:
788:
785:
784:
783:
763:
760:
759:
758:
738:
735:
734:
733:
713:
710:
709:
708:
688:
685:
683:
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
632:WP:NOTTEXTBOOK
607:
606:
605:
604:
603:
602:
516:
513:
511:
487:
486:
470:
469:
467:
466:
461:
456:
450:
447:
446:
442:
441:
439:
438:
436:External links
433:
428:
422:
419:
418:
411:
408:
405:
404:
401:
400:
397:
396:
385:
379:
378:
376:
359:the discussion
346:
345:
329:
317:
316:
308:
296:
295:
292:
291:
288:Control theory
284:
274:
273:
266:Mid-importance
262:
256:
255:
253:
223:
222:
206:
194:
193:
191:Mid‑importance
185:
173:
172:
166:
155:
141:
140:
130:
120:
119:
78:
66:
65:
50:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
975:
964:
961:
959:
956:
954:
951:
949:
946:
944:
941:
939:
936:
934:
931:
929:
926:
924:
921:
920:
918:
911:
910:
906:
902:
898:
894:
890:
882:
880:
879:
875:
871:
869:
859:
857:
856:
852:
848:
846:
836:
832:
828:
824:
822:
816:
815:
811:
807:
803:
799:
797:
791:
790:
786:
782:
778:
774:
772:
766:
765:
761:
757:
753:
749:
747:
741:
740:
736:
732:
728:
724:
722:
716:
715:
711:
707:
703:
699:
697:
691:
690:
686:
681:
675:
671:
667:
665:
658:
657:
656:
653:
652:
648:
647:
641:
633:
628:
627:
626:
625:
621:
617:
615:
601:
597:
593:
591:
585:
584:
583:
579:
575:
573:
567:
566:
565:
562:
561:
557:
556:
550:
549:
548:
547:
543:
539:
537:
531:
527:
525:
514:
512:
509:
508:
504:
501:
498:
494:
491:
485:
483:
479:
474:
473:
465:
462:
460:
457:
455:
452:
451:
449:
448:
443:
437:
434:
432:
429:
427:
424:
423:
421:
420:
415:
409:
394:
390:
384:
381:
380:
377:
360:
356:
352:
351:
343:
337:
332:
330:
327:
323:
322:
318:
312:
309:
306:
302:
289:
280:
276:
275:
271:
267:
261:
258:
257:
254:
237:
233:
229:
228:
220:
209:
207:
204:
200:
199:
195:
189:
186:
183:
179:
174:
170:
164:
156:
147:
146:
131:
128:
124:
117:
113:
109:
108:
103:
100:
99:
97:
93:
92:
87:
83:
79:
76:
72:
71:
61:
56:
55:
48:
44:
40:
36:
35:
34:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
905:push to talk
886:
867:
865:
863:
844:
842:
840:
820:
818:
795:
793:
770:
768:
745:
743:
720:
718:
695:
693:
687:Well-written
663:
661:
650:
645:
639:
613:
611:
608:
589:
587:
571:
569:
559:
554:
535:
533:
523:
521:
518:
515:Introduction
510:
499:
489:
488:
475:
464:Instructions
389:Low-priority
388:
348:
314:Low‑priority
265:
225:
169:WikiProjects
105:
102:Did you know
101:
91:Did you know
89:
81:
80:A fact from
52:
43:please do so
31:
30:
26:
478:transcluded
364:Mathematics
355:mathematics
311:Mathematics
96:check views
917:Categories
431:Authorship
417:GA toolbox
37:under the
868:North8000
845:North8000
821:North8000
796:North8000
771:North8000
746:North8000
721:North8000
696:North8000
664:North8000
614:North8000
590:North8000
572:North8000
536:North8000
524:North8000
493:North8000
490:Reviewer:
454:Templates
445:Reviewing
410:GA Review
137:Knowledge
86:Main Page
646:Spinning
634:policy:
555:Spinning
503:contribs
459:Criteria
159:GA-class
47:reassess
391:on the
268:on the
241:Systems
232:systems
188:Systems
88:in the
165:scale.
54:Review
651:Spark
640:teach
560:Spark
480:from
899:. —
891:and
874:talk
851:talk
827:talk
802:talk
777:talk
752:talk
727:talk
702:talk
670:talk
620:talk
596:talk
578:talk
542:talk
530:talk
497:talk
234:and
383:Low
260:Mid
110:in
49:it.
919::
907:)
876:)
853:)
829:)
804:)
779:)
754:)
729:)
704:)
672:)
622:)
598:)
580:)
544:)
505:)
63:).
903:(
872:(
849:(
825:(
800:(
775:(
750:(
725:(
700:(
668:(
618:(
594:(
576:(
540:(
528:(
500:·
495:(
395:.
290:.
272:.
238:.
171::
129:.
118:?
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
