21:
31:
92:
The example in this article does not make sense - none of those are identity relations. Furthermore, in mathematics, identity is expressed as a triple equals sign, rendered as
110:
64:
Hmm, I don't think so. ie if a variable a == b, that doesn't mean that the variables a and b are actually the same variable...
54:
27:
112:. In fact, I'm not convinced this even warrants its own article, and am tagging it for deletion as such. --
39:
20:
95:
73:
58:
116:
81:
65:
113:
15:
80:
I guess I shouldn't use the equals sign. I'll change that.
98:
104:
8:
97:
72:Ohh, that makes sense. Thanks. :) --
7:
14:
19:
55:Transitive property of equality
30:on 2007 March 7. The result of
26:This article was nominated for
1:
132:
117:10:27, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
84:18:15 14 Jun 2003 (UTC)
68:18:12 14 Jun 2003 (UTC)
61:18:09 14 Jun 2003 (UTC)
53:Is this the same as the
105:{\displaystyle \equiv }
76:18:14 14 Jun 2003 (UTC)
106:
107:
40:Identity (philosophy)
96:
102:
46:
45:
123:
111:
109:
108:
103:
23:
16:
131:
130:
126:
125:
124:
122:
121:
120:
94:
93:
90:
51:
12:
11:
5:
129:
127:
101:
89:
86:
78:
77:
50:
47:
44:
43:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
128:
119:
118:
115:
99:
88:Some Comments
87:
85:
83:
75:
71:
70:
69:
67:
62:
60:
56:
48:
41:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
91:
79:
63:
52:
35:
74:Notheruser
59:Notheruser
49:Untitled
36:redirect
28:deletion
82:Evercat
66:Evercat
114:Haemo
57:? --
34:was
38:to
100:≡
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
