Talk:Transphobia/Archive 3 - Knowledge (XXG)

692:

view that not even all religious people believe in. The second is unconscious fear - the lines between the traditional understanding of what a man or a woman is become blurred in the eyes of the observer, which can present a whole host of issues. The third is that it's considered decietful and/or delusional - that transsexual men or women are just going around pretending to be what they appear to be, and unsuspecting men and women are being decieved by them. Finally, the fourth is that it's wrong to pander to a delusion and allow transsexual people to believe that they are who they are - which a long history of medicine, and indeed, a history of various cultures around the world proves wrong. So far, nobody has come up with a rational argument supporting the premise that transsexualism is immoral besides a variation on one of these four points, and each of thes four points can be demonstrated to be wrong (or in the case of religion - feel free to believe what one likes, but it doesn't mean it applies to the rest that don't believe in it). As such, and considering what the non-treatment of gender dysphoria means, it's impossible to have a discussion of the premise that treatment of gender dysphoria and allowing people to live how they see fit (which is pretty harmless to the rest of the world in the case of transsexualism) is immoral without the context of transphobia, because any of the four main fundamental bases of the argument can be demonstrated to carry with them a degree of transphobia, let alone the consequences of non-treatment. Speaking out against "transsexual transition" or "transsexual surgery" is speaking out against transsexualism and the condition itself (A condition proved to exist). Except in incredibly rare circumstances, it's not possible to speak out against it without a degree of transphobia. People are free to hold their opinions if they like, but the only way no not be covered under the reach of the term "transphobia" is to refrain from advocationg on the basis of them... or as the old saying goes "live and let live".

431:

Having posted a personal as an experiment, I stated that I was trans, and included a photo of a non-trans friend. Some responses I got back were from people that are obviously transphobic (with or without varying degrees of homophobia.) One response was "you're hot, too bad I'm not gay." Another told me "the picture is attractive, but I feel oddly uneased by looking at it knowing that you're trans." Any feeling of "unease" that the person was feeling was exclusively their own fabrication. There was nothing in the picture to evoke a trans response, except context. These people found the picture to be attractive, but refused to consider dating solely for the reason that they were told that she was trans. There is no justifiable "they're simply unattracted to transwomen", but rather only an unjustifiable "they are repulsed by the idea of transwomen." Now, to be honest, I'm dating (on/off) a guy who does not find me attractive because I'm trans, however, we've been together on and off for awhile, as he struggles with his emotional attraction to me competing against his physical interests. It's not being unattracted to a trans person that makes the unwillingness to date be transphobia, it's the absolute refusal to even consider the idea that makes it transphobic. --

901:

her any more notable, or any more information about her that is relevant in this context. Please keep in mind this is a discussion not a vote... per nom "votes" dont really count. You need to make a case. So Benjiboi's point is valid, but I think he sort of shoots it in the foot.. when he says that its a rally cry for the community. It indicates that further information contributed to the article would be about the effect the single event had as it relates to the discrimintation against transexuals, NOT Tyra Hunter. I looked at all the references supplied in the article and really there is not much more to the Tyra Hunter angle that what is written. Can you see what I am trying to get at...? I will caveat this with.. this is not my field. I am looking at this from the angle as to whether this person warrants an biographical article...IE an article about their life....? I mean no disrespect to Ms Hunter or her family regarding her importance.

261:

etc against any particular group. The situation arrises that a systemic bias can present a situation where trans (for therapy, etc) need perform exceptional steps in order to be permitted to attend medical appointments, or perhaps even not permitted at all, e.g. allowances for going to a medical appointment may be permitted for physical issues only, as GID is still a mental disorder, it fails to pass the muster to get permission. There are also situations where a law, entirely unintentionally, impacts severly upon a protected group. An English-only policy is a systemic bias against people who are unable to learn a new language no matter how hard they try, and the courts agreed that it would be, but that such a systemic bias was allowable only under the case that English-only was absolutely necessary to perform their job. Such a company that has a legitimate English-only policy would have a systemic bias against most foreign nationals. --

967:

section on this page. Once more information is available it can be recreated as an article in its on right. My belief is that if this article was put to the wider wiki community as an AFD debate, the article would get deleted...FOR entirely the wrong reason. There are enough stupid people out there that would join the discussion with the wrong motivation. That should not be allowed to happen. I believe that the merge and redirect leaves the article open to expansion at a later date if that happens but at the same time prevents needless repetition of the current information available. As a side effect I think the addition of information improves the transphobia arguement as it shows exactly how serious certain states are on this issue. ie the degree of compensation achieved. As a side note the articles sources are decidely not

1723:

feel that many of the things it describes by definition are justifiable for one reason or another, that does not change the fact that the term exists, nor does it change its meaning. The reason there is no "opposition to the use of the term transphobia" section is because it would be obsurd to have such a section in an encyclopedia article in the same way that it would be obsurd to have an opposition to the term ageism/racism/homophobia/etc section in an encyclopedia. Such a section could only say that some people are opposed to the use of the term because they believe transsexual people are wrong/immoral/unnatural/abominations/etc ... which would fall foul of

560:

distinct entity from transphobia, nor is transphobia usually based on it in particular. As such, a statement to the effect of "A number of people feel that it is immoral to perform sexual reassignment surgeries" does not warrant inclusion in this particular article. Even if it did, the increasing reams of supporting evidence against that view would also have to presented, as well as the reasons for the argument against it, which would require an entire section that would thus be completely out of place in this article - Knowledge (XXG) after all is not the place for debate or discussion of such issues. That's what the rest of the world to do.

1860:"While many gays and lesbians feel that transgender is simply a name for a part of their own community (i.e. the LGBT community), others actively reject the idea that transgender people are part of their community, seeing them as entirely separate and distinct. Some feel that bisexuality and transgenderism are detrimental to the social and political acceptance of gays and lesbians. This phenomenon has been called internalized homophobia, meaning an irrational fear and dislike of other homosexuals. 410:

transwomen), and then when she/he makes sure out of respect for you that you know of his/her previous sex you annul the whole relationship and completely disown the person, well, that could be considered a tad on the transphobic side (as opposed to remaining good friends with that person even though you felt unable to have a sexual relationship with him or her, which wouldn't be transphobic). Reason being, both before and after telling of that painful past, he's/she's still the same person.

224:

attraction, and when I told him that I was a transsexual, he said, "what's that?" We ended up dating for about a month, and then he broke up with me because I "deserve better" than him. The guy was entirely non-transphobic and was very much of the opinion that I was absolutely a girl, and no doubts, and if other people don't see that, then they're, in his words, "stupid". Before he knew me, he may have unintentionally made an action that impacted a transsexual, but because he didn't even

1868:

lesbian and gay community against transsexual individuals and bisexual individuals combinded into one idea? Shouldn't the latter be on biphobia's page? What is the core neutrality issue here, though, is that it implies that a misunderstanding between what constitutes gender and sexuality is inherently transphobic -- deeply transphobic, even. To top it off, there's no citation for that second paragraph, and it comes off as an attack, and not an encyclopedia article.

31: 499:

way about transsexual people, even if there were an actual inverted penis involved in the sense that a desire to have sex with such a person is abnormal as you imply. After all, Gay people are perfectly normal. Abnormal is feeling the need to pose utterly ill-informed comments on an online encyclopedia in order to do nothing but share your prejudice. Besides, Dating != always equal sex, and Knowledge (XXG) is not a discussion forum!

1694:) 23:19, 31 January 2011 (UTC)I agree with the original poster. This article is biased: it says anyone who disagrees with the validity of transsexuality is transphobic. This opinion however IS BIGOTED, because disagreement is different than hate. Finally just because a group is oppressed it doesn't mean it's above criticism (what about pedophiles? -not comparing the two) 1169:

changing room with men is being "demeaned" and should be supported. Either there is merit to gender segregated facilities or not (which is beyond the scope of this article) but the article is saying that only transpersons can reasonably desire gender segregated facilities; non-transpersons are being discriminatory. Clearly this has not been thought through.

1125:'s book "Some Issues of Human Sexuality". Some Anglicans do not agree with 'Some Issues', either in part of in total, some do. Many Evangelicals would concur with the EA report "Transsexualism", but some do disagree (Accepting Evangelicals, for example). It is hard to see who Parakleo speak for apart from the organiser himself. I hope this helps. 1140:

non-religious setting becomes transphobia. In a non-religious setting, such a view belongs only to the religious person, and cannot be said to be in any way definitive (or civil, decent, or polite). As such, religious views of trans people are irrelevant to the subject of transphobia, except where those religious views are used as an excuse for it.

1173:*personally* prefer rather than the facilities that non-transexuals are obligated to use by virtue of their primary sexual characteristics. If women can be morally obligated to put up with the presence of transwomen- that is, men in drag- in their facilities, why cannot the men in drag be morally obligated to put up with using the mens' facilities? 763: 1541:

transphobic some feminists have been ...no... is it just America... no. See uk and Julie Burchill controversy. The issue with this article is that it will be one-sided in that prejudice hate should always be written from the victims point of view, and discriminators are always offended more by being called prejudice than seems credible.

2250:. I believe this page is only one of very many instances of this. WP contains entries for very many slang/neologisms of trans issues in favor to what the professional RS's contain. Although I have no problem with pop terms themselves, their coverage is being used on WP to replace rather than supplement the professional RS's. 553:

anorexia nervosa). Those who would advocate against the procedure on grounds of immorality are thus advocating for these peoples deaths, as there is no alternative treatment for the procedure. The procedure itself incidentally, carries a 97% success rate, higher than most other medical treatments available for most conditions.

1054:??? I guess she at least got to live after the whole bus thing... I guess we need transphobes to do a better job at silently wiping out trans people before they become notable even for being dead, still in the mean time maybe we can settle for erasing them from wikipedia, even if they can't entirely be erased from history.-- 2610:

Lastly I've added an original research tag because the extent of the uncited or falsely cited material makes it apparent that the authors are taking their material from verifiable, encyclopedic sources. Overall I haven't done much compared to the problems this article has, but I hope to clarify what

2343:

Per Knowzilla, Wikiwind and Roscelese. The proposed new name is a misnomer, as transphobia is not the same a discrimination of transgenders. If I parse the latin/greek correctly, it is the fear for transgenders, and that does not necessarily lead to discrimination, but also could lead to avoidance or

1802:

have to do with transphobia such that is should be in the see also links? Trans people are not mainstream gay, and in fact, are not nessecarily gay at all. It's not really a related topic. Homophobia, being a similar form of discrimination with similar mechanics in many ways would be a valid see also

1887:

Well, it would certainly provide some balance to note that some trans people, whether reacting to perceived exclusion or not, view themselves as outside the LGBTQ... community and feel no connection to or common cause with gay, lesbian, or bisexual people. Moreover, both of these sides can be noted

1867:

This says that there is a separation between gender and sexuality. Fine; that's perfectly reasonable. It links the issues of bisexuality and transgenderism, though. As sexuality and gender are seperate issues, why are they linked like this? And from this, why is an exclusionary attitude from the

1358:

to a scientific point of view somehow relates to that "What Knowledge (XXG) is not" policy. (By the way, your use of "WP:NOTAFORUM" is incorrect because you are using it as an acronym, which it is not. To be grammatically correct, you should say "Knowledge (XXG) is not a forum.") Of course, it is to

618:

I have to agree. Anytime a medical condition is viewed as immoral it creates a situation for bias, discrimination, and "phobia". Take for example lepers. They were (and in some parts of the world still are) considered to have gotten leprosy by immoral behaviors. This caused the lepers in the bible

552:

They would however, discriminate against them - if not by deed then by word, as Sex Reassignment Surgery is considered a clinically nessecary procedure for those that qualify for it, and the fatality rate for failure to treat the condition runs in the region of 20% (equitable with conditions such as

348:

Discrimination happens in every group and transphobia can even be found wihin the trans communities. Instead of nuancing it towards each L-G-B and T I think it would serve the readers best to explain that it does exist and here is a discussion of it. For every instance we state that such and such is

332:

I know that this sort of transphobia certainly happens, however, I'm wondering if it might differ sufficiently from gay and lesbian transphobia in order to be appropriately placed in its own section? Thoughts of others? I really only know of a few differences, so I don't know if they're significant

260:

I don't believe you're addressing me, as if you were it would appear that there was a massive miscommunication. Assuming you were adressing me: No, that's not what I'm trying to say. It's called a "systemic bias", which need not be caused by transphobia, or any intentional measure of fear, bigotry,

2584:

Well, it's a whole book, but it appears to make no reference to transsexualism except to say in the introduction "Homosexuals are ... distinguished from 'bisexual,' 'transgendered,' and 'transsexual' persons." Therefore without reading the entire book I presume it would not call this "internalized

1863:

This presumes that transgender people are, in fact, "homosexuals", a descriptor which is often hotly debated, but with little real meaning due to the nature of the differences between gender and sexuality – for example, if a transwoman is attracted only to other women, then she is either lesbian by

1447:

I see you still haven't learned how to properly use acronyms. There is no need to capitalize every letter of the word "uncivil." And intersex is just some new-age word that means exactly the same thing as hermaphrodite, which is similar to transsexualism because they both involve confusion of one's

883:

Then you had best make it do so....and keep in mind that as you have pointed out the issue that the article centres around is the death of Tyra Hunter ....NOT Tyra Hunter the person...the problem really is that the article is a biography which is not notable. I see why the event itself is notable,

668:

That's not my experience of the human population of the west. Nor the experience of most people. It's certainly the not the case for the vast majority of those that have researched and know anything about the condition... and it's curiously enough one of the only medical conditions where people who

559:

Transphobia is the name for a form of discrimination. It does not nessecarily confer violence, hate, or fear (though often includes one of the three)... one should also define a "significant proportion" of the population however, by means other than original research. Never the less, SRS is quite a

2295:

move. Silly proposal founded on the false premise that the term is "little used" and a "neologism," when, as Knowzilla points out, it has long since entered common discourse. And silliness of the rationale aside, the move would also just be incorrect, since transphobia is transphobia even when not

1722:

The article is what it is, because it's describing what transphobia is by the definition of the term. Naturally, it does not explain what transphobia is now because that would be unencyclopaedic. Transphobia is a genuine term with a genuine meaning - while you might not like what it means, and may

1168:

There are notable inconsistencies in the position which are not discussed. For instance, it is presumed by the article that a woman who objects to sharing a changing room with transwomen is suffering a phobia (which in this usage implies an irrational hatred). A transwoman who objects to sharing a

1164:

There really needs to be some balance in this article. It simply describes the transexual campaign position, without any real discussion, and includes many assumptions; for instance that transexuality as defined by transcampaigners is a real condition, rather than for instance a mental delusion (a

900:

to flesh out what I am saying... there is no doubt the events surrounding this woman's death are notable. However not in context to her life, but more so in context to the effects that Transphobia has on the life of Transexuals. I cannot see any more information about Tyra Hunter that would make

498:

just as well transsexual women don't have inverted penises then really, isn't it? Merely donor skin that forms an actual vaginal passage, situated amongst an actual labia, in an actual vulva. There's no actual penis involved - that's removed in the surgery. And no... it's not "Normal" to feel that

169:

It's not always transphobia that can cause discrimination against a transgender employee. There are a number of systemic biases that can cause issues where even though applied to all employees, creates an unfair burden for transgendered individuals. For instance, establishing strict working hours,

142:

I vote no on this one... this page is pretty slow anyway, and it really takes no real effort at all to move the page to the next archive number, update the archive box, and copy any active discussions back to the talk page (or even link to them if needs be). It's not even nessecary (and some might

1499:. This is a now a notice that your tone borders on being insulting and aggressive, and there can be consequences for that. As you are a new editor, I recommend you take some time to learn about the guidelines and policies used by this encyclopedia, such as the ones I have already pointed out. - 966:

someone may write a biography. or a movie etc in which case Ms Hunter may reach notability. (which I still debate because I maintain her notability is defined by "TRANSPHOBIA") If this is the case I still believe the information in the page should be merged and the page redirected to the related

691:

Further, there are four primary reasons behind a view of treatment of gender dysphoria being immoral. One is "God made man and woman... nothing else", which apart from being contradicted by the existance of intersex conditions, is a religious view, and not all people are religious. Indeed, it's a

374:

Does being unwilling to be romantically involved with someone who is transgendered amount to transphobia? I read an editorial in the San Francisco Cronicle that seemed to insinuate as much. Not that the threat of being classified as transphobic is going to make me change my position (that I would

1759:

This article has problems with POV but its major concern is that every second claim made seems to be original research. It reads like an essay rather than an article and, as has been mentioned above, it often assumes that things are objectively trasphobic when this often boils down to a case of

1742:

This article is very biased, the only way to deal with this issue is to report "x considers y to be an example of transphobia" rather than "x is transphobia". This is a very complicated issue, but the whole article rests on the trans-activists' definition and understanding of transgender issues,

430:

I think it would be important to clarify this. The people who refuse to date a transgendered person can be put into two groups. Those who are transphobic, and those who are not. Those who are transphobic are disgusted exclusively by the idea that a person is trans, rather than anything else.

117:

MiszaBot only archives a section when the last edit has reached the specified age. If it was set to say 60 or 90 days, that means that no discussion has been added to that section for that many days. Is it still current then, or has it already died due to lack of interest? It's alway possible to

919:

I understand what you're saying. From waht I've seen we do generally treat these as biographies as I believe it allows for additions of information that come out later, like when books, documentaries, movies and fictionalized accounts come out. Often those same researchers will publish material

132:

I'm uneasy about it as there are reasons someone might post something that would help an article but then it's never followed up on or the idea is too advanced for where the article is at the moment as they are organic. Likewise pure drivel or resolved items clutter the page and i welcome their

2565:

The second source (removed) is merely a list of deceased people without enough information to attribute motives (most are crimes, having nothing to do with medicine); the first source speaks only of a particular instance . There is no mention of "gatekeepers" and I find this comment warrants

1172:

This article reads as a polemic on behalf of transactivism, not as an encyclopaedic description of transphobia, which must to be meaningful discuss whether transpobia is itself a meaningful concept and why, in gender segregated facilities, the transexual should use the facilities *they* would

1165:

man who claims to be a horse is surely delusional- if he claims to be a woman, this is presumed to be objectively true. If he claims to be a mare, is only the horse part a delusion, but the gender part real? And so on). Whether or not men can be women "inside" is surely a controversial issue.

1139:

Equally important is that a religious view belongs to a religion or a person of that religion... there is no proof or additional respect for it in secular terms - only in religious terms. As such, the outward application to trans people of a religious view that stands aganst trans people in a

409:

That said, if you were to fall deeply in love with a transsexual (as opposed to a transvestite or an otherwise transgender person - just for simplicity of analogy more than anything), and had been involved in a relationship with him or her for some time without sex(there are both transmen and

223:

actions, unconscious or otherwise. Calling someone "transphobic" before they are even aware of transsexuality, or their concerns, is placing blame for being ignorant (as in not knowing, not as the insult). And may entirely end up being not the case. I talked with a guy a lot, and we had an

2597:

also become unclear in a similar way under this philosophy, and many feel that the only real recourse is to accept that the mind and feeling of a person is the only thing that gives that person identity, and so a person that has a female identity and mind is indeed a woman, as agreed by much

1540:

Knowledge (XXG)'s reputation on this subject and its so called great editors is so poor on this subject that I can't believe that it has the gall to have a section on this subject. Not sure this subject will ever be right because the subjects are full of non-sense. Do we need a lesson on how

2450:, others above have established that it is a common name for the topic. I too would have tended to think "transphobia" was a neologism, until looking around google. The term is conveniently similar to homophobia in structure and avoids gender≠sex problem of the descriptive title proposed. 2576:, meaning an irrational fear and dislike of other homosexuals. This presumes that transgender people are, in fact, "homosexuals", a descriptor which is often hotly debated, but with little real meaning due to the nature of the differences between gender and sexuality – for example, if a 527:

but would not commit violence against the transgendered/transsexual population, neither would be afraid of or hate them. How are these people to be classified? I don't fully understand the article, but I hope these people are not grouped in with transphobics who would commit violence.

218:

My point was trying to state that discrimination against trans people is not necessarily transphobia. Laws have side-effects, and some of those side-effects may discriminate against transgender people without having any intention to do so. Transphobia to me is specifically narrow to

2269: 283:

OK, see what you mean now. I think a similar thing could be stated for almost all the discrimination related phobia articles that sometimes perceived intentions could actually be systematic bias. I would support some wording to be placed in the article if it hasn't already.

2525:

I have removed a large amount of material from this article because it is contentious and either unsourced or falsely sourced (the referenced material does not make the claim the article makes). I will list the removed content below, in the case that it is challenged.

653:

So will it be the case that those who believe that transsexual transition is immoral and unethical, though they probably make up the majority of the population in the US and most other countries, will not have a place for discussion without the context of transphobia?

822:

article needs a lot of work but like many high profile deaths it has transcended the one event and became a rallying cry for action and change - in this case, transgender communities. I think you'll find there is more than enough to turn that into a good article.

619:

to be treated like literal crap, despite the vast odds that they would not spread leprosy. Leprosy is caused an extremely weak bacterium... very few people with healthy immune systems are susceptible to getting leprosy. In the same way GID seems to be even

1856:

I'm more of a lurker than an editor, most of the time, but I've read this section several times, and keep coming away from it with the impression that it's, perhaps, not a neutral discussion of the issues at hand. Specifically, these sections jump out:

672:

In any case, the place for such a discussion, should anybody wish to hold it, is with the science, the scientists, the medics that have studied it, and transsexual people themselves. The place to discuss it is not Knowledge (XXG). Knowledge (XXG) is

531:

At "sex reassignment therapy" I removed some part of the "controversy" section because of the use of weasel words, but only that section I could find that mentioned people who thought sex reassignment therapy was immoral, but were not transphobic.

305:

Cool, I'll try and look through the article and ensure that it's not ascribing any unintentional, unintended, or even most earnestly regretful actions that impact only transsexuals. I will admit, it's hard to come up with a good example. :(

623:

rare than susceptibility to leprosy, yet it is still viewed as "immoral". At least some islam cultures have recognized a difference between someone who has no choice, and someone who does. (Such that, not all transgendered people are

1021:. There is now also a drop in centre named after Tyra. Rather than merge into the main Transphobia article it would make more sense to extend the Tyra Hunter article to include information of the drop in centre named after her 133:

archiving to help communication. I think on project pages and user talk auto-archiving can be quite useful but I remain uneased as to their application on article talk. Having stated that if everyone else wants it then oh well.

246:

Trying to re-digest this. I think you're stating that some transphobia actually is either purposely or unintentionally discrimination against disabled people who may need time off for medical reasons, etc. Is that on target?

1871:

I don't know how to re-write it, which is why I tagged it; plus I figured that it would be reverted, without consensus. This is not an attack on transgender issues; I just think that this comes across as awfully one-sided.

390:

No, being unattracted to transpeople doesn't make one transphobic, any more than being unattracted to women makes one misogynistic. However, your comments on this page make it clear that you are transphobic anyway.

733:{{cite web |last=Weiss|first=Jillian Todd|title=GL vs. BT: The Archaeology of Biphobia and Transphobia Within the U.S. Gay and Lesbian Community|url=http://phobos.ramapo.edu/~jweiss/glvsbt.htm|accessdate=2006-07-07}} 2151:- term is increasingly used by government officials, UN officials, civil rights organizations, etc. It is a fairly well established term which increasingly used nowadays, and cannot be considered a neologism. --~ 2545:

The citation does not corroborate the content. I've left the statement in as it's rather universally believed, but I've added a refimprove tag because none of the claims in the opening paragraph are sourced.

971:. The case is covered from the gender public advocates office and a statement by the president of the GLAA. It may be wise to add any articles of news coverage that can be found to improve the neutrality. 2206:

The term "transphobia" passes the Google test: lots of sources that establish that "transphobia" is a commonly used term to describe discrimination and bigotry towards transsexuals and transgender people.

479:

I don't see anything transphobic about a hetrosexual male being repulsed by an inverted penis etc. Just like normal people are repulsed by the thought of performing sexual acts with infants and animals.

1584:

That Soapbox policy you link to perfectly describes this article, particularity the first point—"Advocacy, propaganda, or recruitment"—for transgendered people. This article also violates the so-called

1760:

mind-reading and subjectivity (the article is justified doing this in cases of court judgements, but otherwise it should refer to it as a who's-saying-what). To show the problem spots of the article

349:

in the gay male or lesbian communities can be countered with well here it is over here as well. We know it exists we should simply talk about it dispassionately enough to express the ideas needed.

1783:

Good work comparing the prose to the sources. I suggest you tag the article with the deficiencies you have identified, and if noone comments in a day or so delete offending material per policy.–

2698:

See Fone, B.R.S. (2000). Homophobia. New York: Metropolitan Books; Sears, J.T., and Williams, W.L. (1997). Overcoming Heterosexism and Homophobia. New York: Columbia University Press

1117:

I think you need to be careful in ascertaining what is a religious view and what is homophobia. Places that have expressed religious views in the UK are the Parakleo Ministry, the UK

108:

I would. bot archiving wipes away all talk items whether resolved or not. I would suggest simply archiving old talk threads to keep this page tidy for those using it but not on auto.

1282:. Of course, it will never be rewritten or deleted because Knowledge (XXG) is mostly written by ultra-liberals (as evidenced by Marja Erwin's hysterical "don't criticize us, we're 585: 726:, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :) 2483:

is the common term in English and in the 16 other Knowledge (XXG) articles in other languages using cognates. The proposed move only describes a subset of transphobia. The

556:

If of course they hold such a belief and keep it to themselves letting it affect neither ther deeds or their words, then naturally this article has nothing to do with them.

196:

The scope of transphobia encompasses far more than employment-related issues: for example, bigotry and prejudice, healthcare issues, and violent crime, just to name a few.

2606:

describe the act; they make no statement on intent or philosophy. The former statement seems to be derived from the reference that follows this one (Jillian Todd Weiss).

2169:

the majority of sources in this article do not even mention "transphobia." There is no history of the term, no etymology of the term. This article as written is about

2427:

Would you care to address the fact that it's the term used by both news sources and scholarly sources, as well as what I pointed out above about it being inaccurate?

928:

of references that have yet to be added but that's a part of regular editing. Articles always need iproving and that one needs a lot of work - but that's what we do.

2026:, mostly children. This is without a doubt the MOST HEINOUS and REPREHENSIBLE exchange I have ever had with anyone on Knowledge (XXG). My God some of these children 588:

the shooter was said to be acting on the ideas and words of those opposed to democratic and LGBT issues/ideas. Sadly, this kind of justified violence seems common.

2231:. Lionel's reasoning is flawed: you don't have to have an etymology of a term to use that term as the common name for something (this isn't Wiktionary!). — 228:

about transsexuals, it would be difficult to say that that action would have been "transphobic". Against "the trans agenda" is not always transphobia. --

1764:

to highlight what content should be sourced, revised, or removed (as I say there, not to dispute the content itself but rather its encyclopedic nature).

98:, with age of last change set to 30 days (ie archive a section 30 days after it is last added to). Any objections? Would 60 or 90 days be preferrred? -- 1406:. Intersex, not hermaphrodite - which has nothing to do with this topic, BTW. Any real 'scientist' in a relevant area would know this, of course. - 1864:

nature of being a woman, or is otherwise a heterosexual man. However, the latter statement could only be made by someone who is deeply transphobic."

94:

Noting that there are now quite a few old sections in this talk page that are no longer being actively discussed, I propose to enable archiving by

2371: 1710: 1074: 2637: 1895: 1226: 584:

against LGBT and black people, their words and ideas often translate to violence by those who act upon the ideas expressed. In the recent

2620: 2487:

is a good model, with violence, discrimination, and transphobic mental health practices as the three main subcategories of transphobia.

1773: 1360: 1055: 633: 1673: 1174: 1586: 1464: 1379: 1302: 1037: 2318:

It's also less than inclusive in that "transsexual" =/= "transgender." So, pretty much a silly and unhelpful proposal all round.

1359:

be expected that you try to so dismiss legitimate arguments, seeing as you are a member of a hermaphroditic organization called "

2436: 2327: 2305: 1945:- but the term is now increasingly used by government officials, UN officials, etc. I doubt that it is a neologism anymore. --~ 2580:

is attracted only to other women, then she is either lesbian by nature of being a woman, or is otherwise a heterosexual man.

170:

which would cause the transgender employee to be held accountable for hours that that employee needs to receive treatment. --

2598:

legislation in Europe enabling transsexual people to have the sex recorded on their birth certificates amended accordingly.

1219:

Holy Christ. Transphobia isn't even a word and there's a whole article on it. What's wrong with this whole Wiki concept?

2553:

who are transphobic will refuse to administer necessary treatment; in at least one case that included the refusal to treat

1204:

Are you just saying that because transsexuals are the one of the last minorities that it's socially acceptable to pick on?

1557: 2224: 2127: 2030:. Have you no human decency??? No compassion for what these parents are going through at the loss of their children??? – 1963:, User:Lionelt has chosen to restore his/hers. The following commentary may be provocative, uncivil, and in violation of 2514:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

2099:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

535:

This point of view seems to make up a significant portion of the population and as such would seem to be encylopedic.

1925:

Is a term a neologism when it used by governments, United Nations officials, civil rights organizations, etc? And if

364: 81: 76: 64: 59: 38: 2216: 1209: 1888:

without imputing homo- or transphobia as the explanation (which would be desirable from a NPOV point of view).

1899: 1706: 1691: 1279: 458: 396: 179: 1230: 1777: 1754: 1714: 1561: 1059: 2616: 2572: 2356:

Though Transphobia comes up in Google searches, few, if any, of the results are reputable academic sources.

1769: 1677: 976: 906: 889: 805: 637: 143:

argue even counterproductive) to archive a talk page that isn't that large anyway (such as this one isn't).

123: 2549:

Often it can be difficult for gender patients to receive proper health care and treatment, because medical

1915:

The term seems to be a neologism. We should rename the article to "Discrimination against transsexuals." –

1891: 1798:

Can I please just ask here.... and no, I don't refer to the association of LGB and T.... what exactly does

1698: 1545: 1452: 1367: 1290: 1222: 1025: 2255: 1702: 1687: 1448:

sex (although hermaphrodism is purely biological, whereas transsexualism is a psychological perversion).

1178: 1495:

I was notifying you of the pages which give the policy on these things. Just as I am now: This is not a

1318: 2416: 2361: 2223:. The Guardian has 166 articles using the term transphobia/transphobic. I'd suggest instead we redirect 1877: 1842: 1750: 1594: 1460: 1375: 1298: 1246: 1193: 1033: 870: 436: 338: 311: 266: 233: 175: 2208: 1590: 1456: 1371: 1294: 1242: 1189: 2492: 2395: 2379: 2345: 2236: 1205: 1118: 1804: 1799: 1403: 1278:

I completely agree with 82.71.30.178. This article is basically an editorial advocating people with

959: 797: 2463: 2451: 2432: 2323: 2301: 2192: 2186:

and one about discrimination against transsexuals/transgender people, because both are notable. --~

2157: 2063: 1975: 1951: 454: 392: 2215:

called transphobia by a huge number of sources including governments and so on. For instance, the

963: 376: 2612: 2467: 2280: 2220: 2113: 1827: 1812: 1765: 1732: 1644: 1512: 1419: 1334: 1265: 1145: 1130: 1093: 990: 989:

A quick google search shows 40+ books mention her - there are tons of sources that can be added.

972: 929: 902: 885: 853: 824: 801: 771: 746: 697: 682: 659: 589: 565: 540: 504: 415: 350: 285: 248: 186: 148: 134: 119: 109: 99: 2054: 1964: 1960: 2211:

specifies that "a good title should convey what the subject is actually called in English". It

185:

I'm not sure what your point is? What needs to change in the article and how? In your opinion.

2603: 2251: 2130:– Transphobia is a little used term and qualifies as a neologism. The page should be moved to 1553: 1122: 380: 203: 1724: 1496: 968: 958:

Okay.. so I hate to harp on a point. BUT is the consensus here that Ms Hunter is notable for

2412: 2357: 2135: 1873: 1838: 1746: 1029: 866: 432: 334: 307: 262: 229: 171: 47: 17: 674: 2534: 2488: 2391: 2232: 95: 2505: 2090: 2428: 2319: 2297: 2187: 2152: 2058: 1970: 1946: 580:

I would also add that similar to other employs of rhetoric against minorities, such as

880: 2538: 2275: 2109: 1823: 1808: 1728: 1632: 1500: 1407: 1322: 1261: 1141: 1126: 1082: 921: 849: 742: 693: 678: 655: 561: 536: 500: 411: 144: 2174: 2139: 2046: 2031: 2014: 1998: 1989: 1931: 1916: 1784: 1549: 198: 2708: 2679: 1092:

If they are sourced extremely well and presented NPOV I think it may be helpful.

2624: 2554: 2496: 2471: 2462:

proposed title would be less emotive and more informative, more encyclopedic. -

2454: 2440: 2420: 2399: 2382: 2365: 2348: 2331: 2309: 2286: 2259: 2240: 2228: 2194: 2177: 2159: 2142: 2123: 2117: 2065: 2049: 2034: 2017: 2001: 1992: 1977: 1953: 1919: 1903: 1881: 1846: 1831: 1816: 1787: 1736: 1681: 1651: 1598: 1519: 1468: 1426: 1383: 1341: 1306: 1269: 1250: 1234: 1213: 1197: 1182: 1149: 1134: 1108: 1086: 1063: 1041: 1005: 980: 945: 910: 893: 874: 857: 840: 819: 809: 800:

because the notable event is the discrimination that took place not the person.

793: 786: 750: 701: 686: 663: 641: 605: 581: 569: 544: 508: 462: 440: 419: 400: 384: 353: 342: 333:

to break out, or simply enough to add a paragraph covering them more exactly. --

315: 288: 270: 251: 237: 209: 189: 152: 137: 127: 112: 102: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1077:, which indicates that some religions have at least some transphobic elements. 2577: 2550: 2530: 1941: 1852:

Neutrality Issue with "Transphobia in the lesbian, gay and bisexual community"

1355: 1051: 962:? BUT the theory applied in the creation of the page is the one day in the 1743:

which are not shared by a majority of scientists, never mind the public.

1631:

Then take it to the noticeboard, and get feedback from neutral editors. -

2558: 2484: 2296:

acted upon in the form of discrimination, just like any other prejudice.

2022:

I am well aware of the tragedy in Oslo. I just had to make sure you were

1078: 669:

know absolutely nothing about it feel qualified to speak on the subject.

375:

never even consider dating a transgender, pre or post-op). Just curious

2659: 1188:

This is insulting other members, and insulting an oppressed community.

1354:

Interesting how you think trying to get the article re-written from a

2182:

Then perhaps there should be two separate articles; one for the term

2387: 1762:

I've marked up the current form of the article in the sandbox here

796:

article be merged here it fails WP:notability for a biography per

1997:"Go blow up something in Norway?" What kind of joke is that? – 25: 2221:

has specific guidelines for homophobic and transphobic crimes

884:

but not why Tyra Hunter is ... notability is not inherited.

453:

I concur, both your explanations are more clear/accurate. --

1672:"Noticeboard"? I looked for that, but can't find anything. 2709:"UK Gender recognition act, Explanatory notes paragraph 4" 1822:

Nevermind. Page was AfD'd anyway so I've reoved the link.

1959:

Notice: Several comments following this were removed per

2089:

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a

523:

Those who believe sex reassignment therapy is immoral...

2173:, not about the evolution of the term "transphobia." – 2041: 2008: 1984: 1939:

is not as widely used or as established a term such as

1935:, which are never used in any official capacity? Yes, 1761: 723: 2711:. UK Office of public Sector Information. 8 July 2004 2561:, for ovarian cancer, of which he subsequently died. 2504:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a

586:

2008 Knoxville Unitarian Universalist church shooting

2638:"Crime reduction – Police crack down on hate crimes" 1727:, and probably the civility policy too as a result. 90:

Propose to start MiszaBot archiving. Any objections?

2040:Note: deleted response by Knowzilla can be found 2007:Note: deleted response by Knowzilla can be found 2370:I suggest you look in google scholar next time. 632:"Literal crap"? Don't you mean "litteral crap"? 2344:just being uneasy when around transgenders. -- 1983:Note: Deleted "joke" by Knowzilla can be found 1073:The article hould maybe include excerpts from 118:bring the same subject up some time later. -- 8: 2024:making a joke out of the murder of 69 people 1536:Knowledge (XXG)'s reputation of this subject 164: 1929:if a neologism, then what about terms like 1535: 1356:pro-gender identity disorder point of view 1837:(This got formatted strangely; disregard) 718:Bot report : Found duplicate references ! 165:Discrimination doesn't need "Transphobia" 2138:for discussion prior to move request. – 2629: 770:Consensus doesn't support this merger. 2411:, transphobia is not the common term. 1069:Religious views of transgendred people 328:Transphobia in the bisexual community? 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1075:religious views on transgender people 7: 2521:False Citations and Removed Material 2104:The result of the move request was: 879:Thats cool if you think it can make 2225:Discrimination against transsexuals 2132:Discrimination against transsexuals 2128:Discrimination against transsexuals 1361:Organisation Intersex International 2529:Many trans people also experience 24: 1121:, and there is discussion in the 2570:This phenomenon has been called 2533:from people who associate their 761: 29: 2625:08:34, 20 September 2011 (UTC) 103:01:59, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 1: 1737:05:33, 17 February 2011 (UTC) 1241:Not a word? WTF do you mean? 1214:00:48, 8 September 2010 (UTC) 1183:23:23, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 1050:Isn't this also the case for 981:05:29, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 946:23:40, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 911:14:52, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 894:14:40, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 875:03:50, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 858:13:58, 4 September 2008 (UTC) 841:12:03, 4 September 2008 (UTC) 810:08:01, 4 September 2008 (UTC) 354:03:35, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 343:21:12, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 316:22:08, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 289:21:18, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 271:19:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 252:08:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 238:20:04, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 210:07:04, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 190:06:49, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 180:20:37, 10 December 2007 (UTC) 153:20:25, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 138:08:40, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 128:07:16, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 113:06:51, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 2604:legislation notes cited here 2028:haven't even been buried yet 1715:23:17, 31 January 2011 (UTC) 1562:17:24, 10 January 2014 (UTC) 1042:20:14, 13 October 2008 (UTC) 1006:20:29, 15 October 2008 (UTC) 920:previously unavailable. See 2660:"FTM Informational Network" 2497:14:24, 13 August 2011 (UTC) 2472:13:38, 13 August 2011 (UTC) 2455:00:37, 13 August 2011 (UTC) 2441:15:49, 12 August 2011 (UTC) 2421:14:04, 12 August 2011 (UTC) 2400:09:42, 10 August 2011 (UTC) 2134:. Please see above section 2118:09:04, 15 August 2011 (UTC) 1788:08:42, 21 August 2011 (UTC) 1778:05:12, 21 August 2011 (UTC) 1064:19:01, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 787:03:33, 3 January 2009 (UTC) 702:16:03, 12 August 2008 (UTC) 687:15:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC) 664:04:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC) 2738: 2383:18:40, 9 August 2011 (UTC) 2366:17:55, 9 August 2011 (UTC) 2349:17:21, 8 August 2011 (UTC) 2332:19:48, 9 August 2011 (UTC) 2310:16:27, 8 August 2011 (UTC) 2287:14:34, 8 August 2011 (UTC) 2260:14:21, 8 August 2011 (UTC) 2241:14:01, 8 August 2011 (UTC) 2195:10:39, 8 August 2011 (UTC) 2178:10:30, 8 August 2011 (UTC) 2160:09:11, 8 August 2011 (UTC) 2143:08:59, 8 August 2011 (UTC) 2136:talk:Transphobia#Neologism 2066:10:32, 8 August 2011 (UTC) 2050:10:19, 8 August 2011 (UTC) 2035:08:49, 8 August 2011 (UTC) 2018:10:19, 8 August 2011 (UTC) 2002:00:20, 8 August 2011 (UTC) 1993:10:19, 8 August 2011 (UTC) 1978:10:32, 8 August 2011 (UTC) 1954:14:12, 7 August 2011 (UTC) 1920:03:43, 2 August 2011 (UTC) 1755:17:45, 8 August 2011 (UTC) 1652:00:48, 7 August 2010 (UTC) 1599:00:38, 7 August 2010 (UTC) 1520:07:43, 6 August 2010 (UTC) 1469:03:05, 6 August 2010 (UTC) 1427:22:25, 5 August 2010 (UTC) 1384:21:21, 5 August 2010 (UTC) 1342:21:01, 5 August 2010 (UTC) 1307:20:50, 5 August 2010 (UTC) 1270:23:22, 31 March 2010 (UTC) 1251:23:07, 31 March 2010 (UTC) 1235:03:22, 30 March 2010 (UTC) 1198:23:07, 31 March 2010 (UTC) 1109:02:42, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1087:10:31, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 924:, for instance. There are 759: 751:12:14, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 724:the last revision I edited 385:23:58, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 2217:Crown Prosecution Service 1904:04:35, 10 July 2011 (UTC) 1882:06:35, 11 June 2011 (UTC) 1847:06:35, 11 June 2011 (UTC) 1832:02:37, 14 June 2010 (UTC) 1817:02:35, 14 June 2010 (UTC) 1150:12:19, 14 June 2009 (UTC) 1135:14:47, 13 June 2009 (UTC) 792:I am suggesting that the 606:17:51, 31 July 2008 (UTC) 570:15:54, 31 July 2008 (UTC) 545:05:37, 31 July 2008 (UTC) 509:12:34, 13 June 2009 (UTC) 2589:The nature of the terms 2511:Please do not modify it. 2096:Please do not modify it. 1682:19:14, 18 May 2014 (UTC) 1280:gender identity disorder 642:18:58, 18 May 2014 (UTC) 463:12:43, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 441:21:55, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 420:03:12, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 2573:internalized homophobia 401:00:12, 9 May 2008 (UTC) 2680:"Remembering Our Dead" 2390:has 37 articles too. — 2219:in the United Kingdom 2640:. Metropolitan Police 1587:Neutral point of view 1160:Bit One-Sided, Iznit? 1127:Mish (just an editor) 365:Google Scholar search 42:of past discussions. 2106:no consensus to move 1119:Evangelical Alliance 677:a discussion forum. 2611:must be addressed. 2380:Kim van der Linde 2346:Kim van der Linde 1894:comment added by 1718: 1701:comment added by 1565: 1548:comment added by 1472: 1455:comment added by 1387: 1370:comment added by 1310: 1293:comment added by 1225:comment added by 1123:Church of England 1045: 1028:comment added by 937: 832: 597: 87: 86: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2729: 2722: 2720: 2718: 2716: 2705: 2699: 2696: 2690: 2689: 2687: 2686: 2676: 2670: 2669: 2667: 2666: 2656: 2650: 2649: 2647: 2645: 2634: 2513: 2378:, but a lot. -- 2285: 2283: 2278: 2270:Widely used term 2190: 2155: 2098: 2061: 1973: 1949: 1906: 1717: 1695: 1647: 1639: 1636: 1564: 1542: 1515: 1507: 1504: 1471: 1449: 1422: 1414: 1411: 1386: 1364: 1337: 1329: 1326: 1309: 1287: 1284:oppressed people 1237: 1105: 1099: 1044: 1022: 1002: 996: 942: 935: 930: 837: 830: 825: 789: 783: 777: 765: 764: 602: 595: 590: 206: 201: 73: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 18:Talk:Transphobia 2737: 2736: 2732: 2731: 2730: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2714: 2712: 2707: 2706: 2702: 2697: 2693: 2684: 2682: 2678: 2677: 2673: 2664: 2662: 2658: 2657: 2653: 2643: 2641: 2636: 2635: 2631: 2535:gender identity 2523: 2518: 2509: 2281: 2277:В и к и в и н д 2276: 2274: 2188: 2153: 2094: 2084: 2059: 1971: 1947: 1913: 1889: 1854: 1796: 1794:Mainstream Gay? 1703:Serena Montaldo 1696: 1688:Serena Montaldo 1645: 1637: 1634: 1543: 1538: 1513: 1505: 1502: 1450: 1420: 1412: 1409: 1365: 1335: 1327: 1324: 1288: 1220: 1206:JessicaSideways 1162: 1103: 1097: 1071: 1023: 1000: 994: 940: 933: 865:as per above -- 835: 828: 790: 781: 775: 769: 767: 762: 758: 756:Merger Proposal 730:"GLBTphobia" : 720: 600: 593: 525: 372: 362: 360:Possible Source 330: 204: 199: 167: 96:User:MiszaBot I 92: 69: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2735: 2733: 2724: 2723: 2700: 2691: 2671: 2651: 2628: 2608: 2607: 2587: 2586: 2568: 2567: 2547: 2546: 2522: 2519: 2517: 2516: 2506:requested move 2500: 2499: 2485:French article 2474: 2457: 2452:Metal lunchbox 2444: 2443: 2424: 2423: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2351: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2313: 2312: 2290: 2263: 2262: 2252:— James Cantor 2244: 2243: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2171:discrimination 2163: 2162: 2121: 2102: 2101: 2091:requested move 2085: 2083: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 1980: 1956: 1912: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1896:98.246.173.144 1853: 1850: 1835: 1834: 1805:mainstream gay 1800:mainstream gay 1795: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1740: 1739: 1685: 1684: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1568: 1537: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1402:Remind you of 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1312: 1311: 1286:" outburst). 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1254: 1253: 1227:68.189.164.199 1217: 1216: 1201: 1200: 1161: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1112: 1111: 1070: 1067: 1049: 1047: 1046: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 984: 983: 951: 950: 949: 948: 914: 913: 897: 896: 877: 860: 843: 760: 757: 754: 740: 739: 738: 737: 734: 719: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 707: 706: 705: 704: 670: 630: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 611: 610: 609: 608: 575: 574: 573: 572: 557: 554: 524: 521: 520: 519: 518: 517: 516: 515: 514: 513: 512: 511: 487: 486: 485: 484: 483: 482: 481: 480: 470: 469: 468: 467: 466: 465: 446: 445: 444: 443: 425: 424: 423: 422: 404: 403: 371: 368: 361: 358: 357: 356: 329: 326: 325: 324: 323: 322: 321: 320: 319: 318: 296: 295: 294: 293: 292: 291: 276: 275: 274: 273: 255: 254: 243: 242: 241: 240: 213: 212: 193: 192: 166: 163: 162: 161: 160: 159: 158: 157: 156: 155: 91: 88: 85: 84: 79: 74: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2734: 2710: 2704: 2701: 2695: 2692: 2681: 2675: 2672: 2661: 2655: 2652: 2639: 2633: 2630: 2627: 2626: 2622: 2618: 2614: 2613:Theinactivist 2605: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2596: 2592: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2579: 2575: 2574: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2560: 2556: 2552: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2540: 2539:homosexuality 2536: 2532: 2527: 2520: 2515: 2512: 2507: 2502: 2501: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2478: 2475: 2473: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2458: 2456: 2453: 2449: 2446: 2445: 2442: 2438: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2425: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2410: 2407: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2372:1680 articles 2369: 2368: 2367: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2352: 2350: 2347: 2342: 2339: 2338: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2321: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2311: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2294: 2291: 2289: 2288: 2284: 2279: 2271: 2268: 2265: 2264: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2249: 2246: 2245: 2242: 2238: 2234: 2230: 2226: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2210: 2205: 2202: 2201: 2196: 2193: 2191: 2185: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2165: 2164: 2161: 2158: 2156: 2150: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2125: 2120: 2119: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2100: 2097: 2092: 2087: 2086: 2082:Proposed move 2081: 2067: 2064: 2062: 2056: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2048: 2044: 2043: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2033: 2029: 2025: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2016: 2012: 2010: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2000: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1991: 1987: 1986: 1981: 1979: 1976: 1974: 1968: 1966: 1962: 1957: 1955: 1952: 1950: 1944: 1943: 1938: 1934: 1933: 1928: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1918: 1910: 1905: 1901: 1897: 1893: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1879: 1875: 1869: 1865: 1861: 1858: 1851: 1849: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1801: 1793: 1789: 1786: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1766:Theinactivist 1763: 1757: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1693: 1689: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1670: 1653: 1649: 1648: 1641: 1640: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1566: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1521: 1517: 1516: 1509: 1508: 1498: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1428: 1424: 1423: 1416: 1415: 1405: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1362: 1357: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1343: 1339: 1338: 1331: 1330: 1320: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1276: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1202: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1170: 1166: 1159: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1110: 1107: 1106: 1100: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1068: 1066: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1056:81.86.105.166 1053: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1020: 1019:Strong oppose 1017: 1016: 1007: 1004: 1003: 997: 988: 987: 986: 985: 982: 978: 974: 973:benjicharlton 970: 965: 961: 957: 956: 955: 954: 953: 952: 947: 944: 943: 936: 927: 923: 922:Brandon Teena 918: 917: 916: 915: 912: 908: 904: 903:benjicharlton 899: 898: 895: 891: 887: 886:benjicharlton 882: 878: 876: 872: 868: 864: 863:Strong oppose 861: 859: 855: 851: 847: 846:Strong oppose 844: 842: 839: 838: 831: 821: 817: 816:Strong oppose 814: 813: 812: 811: 807: 803: 802:benjicharlton 799: 795: 788: 785: 784: 778: 755: 753: 752: 748: 744: 735: 732: 731: 729: 728: 727: 725: 717: 703: 699: 695: 690: 689: 688: 684: 680: 676: 671: 667: 666: 665: 661: 657: 652: 651: 650: 649: 648: 647: 646: 645: 644: 643: 639: 635: 634:208.54.85.170 622: 617: 616: 615: 614: 613: 612: 607: 604: 603: 596: 587: 583: 579: 578: 577: 576: 571: 567: 563: 558: 555: 551: 550: 549: 548: 547: 546: 542: 538: 533: 529: 522: 510: 506: 502: 497: 496: 495: 494: 493: 492: 491: 490: 489: 488: 478: 477: 476: 475: 474: 473: 472: 471: 464: 460: 456: 452: 451: 450: 449: 448: 447: 442: 438: 434: 429: 428: 427: 426: 421: 417: 413: 408: 407: 406: 405: 402: 398: 394: 389: 388: 387: 386: 382: 378: 369: 367: 366: 359: 355: 352: 347: 346: 345: 344: 340: 336: 327: 317: 313: 309: 304: 303: 302: 301: 300: 299: 298: 297: 290: 287: 282: 281: 280: 279: 278: 277: 272: 268: 264: 259: 258: 257: 256: 253: 250: 245: 244: 239: 235: 231: 227: 222: 217: 216: 215: 214: 211: 208: 207: 202: 195: 194: 191: 188: 184: 183: 182: 181: 177: 173: 154: 150: 146: 141: 140: 139: 136: 131: 130: 129: 125: 121: 120:AliceJMarkham 116: 115: 114: 111: 107: 106: 105: 104: 101: 100:AliceJMarkham 97: 89: 83: 80: 78: 75: 72: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2713:. Retrieved 2703: 2694: 2683:. Retrieved 2674: 2663:. Retrieved 2654: 2642:. Retrieved 2632: 2609: 2594: 2590: 2588: 2585:homophobia." 2571: 2569: 2548: 2528: 2524: 2510: 2503: 2480: 2476: 2459: 2447: 2408: 2375: 2353: 2340: 2292: 2273: 2266: 2247: 2212: 2203: 2183: 2170: 2166: 2148: 2131: 2122: 2105: 2103: 2095: 2088: 2039: 2027: 2023: 2006: 1982: 1958: 1940: 1936: 1932:heterophobia 1930: 1926: 1914: 1890:— Preceding 1870: 1866: 1862: 1859: 1855: 1836: 1797: 1758: 1745: 1741: 1697:— Preceding 1686: 1674:172.56.26.49 1643: 1633: 1589:" policy. — 1567: 1544:— Preceding 1539: 1511: 1501: 1418: 1408: 1333: 1323: 1319:WP:NOTAFORUM 1283: 1218: 1175:82.71.30.178 1171: 1167: 1163: 1101: 1095: 1072: 1048: 1018: 998: 992: 938: 931: 925: 862: 845: 833: 826: 815: 791: 779: 773: 741: 721: 631: 620: 598: 591: 534: 530: 526: 373: 363: 331: 225: 220: 197: 168: 93: 70: 43: 37: 2715:8 September 2555:Robert Eads 2551:gatekeepers 2481:Transphobia 2413:NYyankees51 2376:few, if any 2358:Dgiovagnoli 2229:Transphobia 2209:WP:CRITERIA 2184:transphobia 2124:Transphobia 1937:transphobia 1927:transphobia 1874:Dgiovagnoli 1839:Dgiovagnoli 1747:Boynamedsue 1591:Guidepoint2 1457:Guidepoint2 1451:—Preceding 1372:Guidepoint2 1366:—Preceding 1295:Guidepoint2 1289:—Preceding 1243:Marja Erwin 1221:—Preceding 1190:Marja Erwin 1030:Theban Moon 1024:—Preceding 867:Puellanivis 820:Tyra Hunter 794:Tyra Hunter 582:Jesse Helms 433:Puellanivis 335:Puellanivis 308:Puellanivis 263:Puellanivis 230:Puellanivis 221:intentional 172:Puellanivis 36:This is an 2685:2009-11-24 2665:2009-11-24 2578:transwoman 2531:homophobia 2489:Jokestress 2392:Tom Morris 2233:Tom Morris 1942:homophobia 1803:link, but 1497:WP:SOAPbox 1404:WP:UNCIVIL 1052:Rosa Parks 848:per above 798:WP:ONEVENT 736:GLBTphobia 2429:Roscelese 2320:Roscelese 2298:Roscelese 2189:Knowzilla 2154:Knowzilla 2060:Knowzilla 1972:Knowzilla 1948:Knowzilla 1911:Neologism 960:one event 82:Archive 5 77:Archive 4 71:Archive 3 65:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 2621:contribs 2566:removal. 2559:transman 2464:Haymaker 2437:contribs 2328:contribs 2306:contribs 2110:Favonian 2055:WP:FORUM 1965:WP:FORUM 1961:WP:FORUM 1892:unsigned 1824:Crimsone 1809:Crimsone 1774:contribs 1729:Crimsone 1711:contribs 1699:unsigned 1558:contribs 1546:unsigned 1465:contribs 1453:unsigned 1380:contribs 1368:unsigned 1303:contribs 1291:unsigned 1223:unsigned 1142:Crimsone 1038:contribs 1026:unsigned 850:Crimsone 766:Resolved 743:DumZiBoT 694:Crimsone 679:Crimsone 656:Cornince 624:immoral) 562:Crimsone 537:Cornince 501:Crimsone 412:Crimsone 351:Benjiboi 286:Benjiboi 249:Benjiboi 187:Benjiboi 145:Crimsone 135:Benjiboi 110:Benjiboi 2460:Support 2409:Support 2374:is not 2354:Support 2282:T a L k 2248:Comment 2167:Support 1725:WP:SOAP 1550:J Beake 969:neutral 377:Gtbob12 200:krimpet 39:archive 2644:6 June 2477:Oppose 2448:Oppose 2341:Oppose 2293:Oppose 2267:Oppose 2204:Oppose 2175:Lionel 2149:Oppose 2140:Lionel 2047:Lionel 2032:Lionel 2015:Lionel 1999:Lionel 1990:Lionel 1917:Lionel 1785:Lionel 1317:Yawn. 964:future 818:. The 455:Alynna 393:Alynna 370:Dating 2595:woman 2537:with 2388:JSTOR 2057:? --~ 926:a lot 16:< 2717:2006 2646:2009 2617:talk 2602:The 2593:and 2557:, a 2493:talk 2468:talk 2433:talk 2417:talk 2396:talk 2362:talk 2324:talk 2302:talk 2256:talk 2237:talk 2114:talk 2042:here 2009:here 1985:here 1900:talk 1878:talk 1843:talk 1828:talk 1813:talk 1770:talk 1751:talk 1733:talk 1707:talk 1692:talk 1678:talk 1646:Talk 1638:Mich 1635:Mish 1595:talk 1554:talk 1514:Talk 1506:Mich 1503:Mish 1461:talk 1421:Talk 1413:Mich 1410:Mish 1376:talk 1363:." 1336:Talk 1328:Mich 1325:Mish 1299:talk 1266:talk 1262:Mish 1247:talk 1231:talk 1210:talk 1194:talk 1179:talk 1146:talk 1131:talk 1096:Banj 1083:talk 1060:talk 1034:talk 993:Banj 977:talk 932:Banj 907:talk 890:talk 881:WP:N 871:talk 854:talk 827:Banj 806:talk 774:Banj 747:talk 698:talk 683:talk 660:talk 638:talk 621:more 592:Banj 566:talk 541:talk 505:talk 459:talk 437:talk 416:talk 397:talk 381:talk 339:talk 312:talk 267:talk 234:talk 226:know 176:talk 149:talk 124:talk 2591:man 2508:. 2272:.-- 2227:to 1969:--~ 1094:-- 1079:ADM 991:-- 772:-- 722:In 675:not 2623:) 2619:• 2541:. 2495:) 2479:. 2470:) 2439:) 2435:⋅ 2419:) 2398:) 2364:) 2330:) 2326:⋅ 2308:) 2304:⋅ 2258:) 2239:) 2213:is 2126:→ 2116:) 2108:. 2093:. 2045:– 2013:– 1988:– 1902:) 1880:) 1845:) 1830:) 1815:) 1807:? 1776:) 1772:• 1753:) 1735:) 1713:) 1709:• 1680:) 1650:- 1642:- 1597:) 1560:) 1556:• 1518:- 1510:- 1467:) 1463:• 1425:- 1417:- 1382:) 1378:• 1340:- 1332:- 1321:- 1305:) 1301:• 1268:) 1260:] 1249:) 1233:) 1212:) 1196:) 1181:) 1148:) 1133:) 1104:oi 1085:) 1062:) 1040:) 1036:• 1001:oi 979:) 941:oi 909:) 892:) 873:) 856:) 836:oi 808:) 782:oi 768:– 749:) 700:) 685:) 662:) 640:) 601:oi 568:) 543:) 507:) 461:) 439:) 418:) 399:) 391:-- 383:) 341:) 314:) 306:-- 269:) 236:) 178:) 151:) 126:) 2721:. 2719:. 2688:. 2668:. 2648:. 2615:( 2491:( 2466:( 2431:( 2415:( 2394:( 2360:( 2322:( 2300:( 2254:( 2235:( 2112:( 2011:. 1967:. 1898:( 1876:( 1841:( 1826:( 1811:( 1768:( 1749:( 1731:( 1705:( 1690:( 1676:( 1593:( 1585:" 1552:( 1459:( 1374:( 1297:( 1264:( 1245:( 1229:( 1208:( 1192:( 1177:( 1144:( 1129:( 1102:b 1098:e 1081:( 1058:( 1032:( 999:b 995:e 975:( 939:b 934:e 905:( 888:( 869:( 852:( 834:b 829:e 804:( 780:b 776:e 745:( 696:( 681:( 658:( 636:( 599:b 594:e 564:( 539:( 503:( 457:( 435:( 414:( 395:( 379:( 337:( 310:( 265:( 232:( 205:⟲ 174:( 147:( 122:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index