607:
itself has no consequence in terms of the status of individuals charged with an offence. In Scots law, "not proven" is a category of acquittal, just as in Italy, so the defendant for whom the "not proven" sentence is reached is technically not guilty of the offence s/he is charged with. The purpose of the "not proven" sentence is precisely to differentiate cases in which denfendants were *proven* innocent (covered by the other category of acquittal, "not guilty") from cases in which there was not enough evidence to reach a safe conviction *or* to safely discharge the defendant.
920:- The Section entitled "Bribing a judge on Lodo Mondadori: statute of limitations", incorrectly states that "A Prima facie case was issued, but the magistrate decided to drop the charges." In English and Scottish law, a "magistrate" is a lay member of the judiciary, i.e. a member of the public who sits in judgement of certain minor cases instead of Crown Courts, so it looks like here 'magistrate' is a mistranslation of 'magistrato', and therefore should read "judge".
176:
158:
186:
74:
53:
22:
84:
814:
best way to prove it. The section you have introduced at the top of the article is clearly an infringement of NPOV. I invite you to register an account, become accountable for your contributions, and if you so wish try to argue your point with legal sources you consider authoritative instead of shouting or making inappropriate references to the
Italian Constitution. --
273:
252:
538:
The above unsigned note by 217.201.135.245 (as well as the ensuing edits by the same anonymous user that I reverted) is in blatant contradiction with the first paragraph of the article (that 217.201.135.245 also attempted to remove and was reverted by another user). It is one of the tenets of
Italian
838:
This is clearly not an unappropriate reference to the
Italian Constitution. The reference I added became necessary because the continous reverting of the passages in the precesses' summary where it was clearly stated that the trials ended without an enforceable judgement of guiltiness against Silvio
606:
First: the parallel with Scots law *is* appropriate. The fact that
Scottish and British constitutions are "unwritten" simply means that the status of constitutional legislation and ordinary legisilation is not as clearly differentiated as in the case of a written constitution, but this difference in
813:
is the sole correct interpretation of the statute of limitations under
Italian law, not matter how long you keep editing this page. Repeating your point on and on, regardless of what other users say (your recent edits have been reverted by at least 5 registered users for the same reason) is not the
421:
In fact you are right, but as you might know these pages are often edited, and taken care of, by
Berlusconi's dedicated staff. No wonder. You might have also noted that this paragraph about his many trials and convictions has been split off from the main berlusconi bibliography, kind of hiding it.
517:
The statutory limitation does not mean not guilty; at the very least it says nothing about guilt, and in fact it may indicate that he is guilty if the statute of limitations is applied after conceding benefits for previous good conduct (i.e. it would be the first verdict of guilt), because such
657:
Let me attempt another translation: "Where the closure of a trial results from the satisfaction of terms for a statute of limitations incurred as a result of the application of extenuating circumstances, the sentence must recognize the defendant's culpability, and results in prejudice for the
610:
Second: since I am a translator, please note there are (relatively minor) errors in the translation provied for Art. 27(2), the
Italian Senate's official translation for which reads "A defendant shall be considered not guilty until a final sentence has been passed."
637:"Qualora l'applicazione della causa estintiva della prescrizione del reato sia conseguenza della concessione di attenuanti, la sentenza si caratterizza per un previo riconoscimento di colpevolezza dell'imputato ed è fonte per costui di pregiudizio"
401:
is the right juridical expression to characterize some of the verdict described here. Many of the sentences we are talking about don't say "not guilty", they instead say something like "he actually committed the crime
934:- "Illegally financed political party on All Iberian 1" should read "Illegal financing of a political party"; "First Court" should read "Court of First Instance"; and "Appeal Court" should read "Court of Appeal".
475:
As clearly expressed by the comments above, the
Italian judiciary is a madness!!! You are acquitted, but you are not "not guilty": for an English-speaking person this is an absolute devious nonsensical byzantine
723:
It isn't correct, sorry but there is some legal difference...if you want you can write "not condamned" but "not guilty" isn't correct because "not guilty" is only in presence of a complete acquittal sentence
319:
702:
Therefore Silvio
Berlusconi has a clear record up to now because the defendant (i.e. Silvio Berlusconi) is not considered guilty before the issuing of a final and unappealable sentence of guiltiness.
677:
The Court of
Cassation is STILL hyerarchically under the legislation of the Italian Constitution. AND THE ITALIAN CONSTITUTION CLEARLY INCORPORATE THE PRINCIPLE OF NOT GUILTINESS IN THE ITALIAN RIGHT:
284:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
996:
658:
latter." In simpler English: "If extenuating circumstances result in trials being stopped because statute of limitations are incurred, then the sentence must recognize the defendant's guilt".
1160:
640:
I try to translate but is hard:"If the extinsion of the trial for statue of limitation is due to extenuating circumstances, the sentence recognize guilty and is reason for legal prejudice"
285:
898:
Aiuto! I cannot find a way to do this in the Reference editing box myself. Part of the original Italian headline is: "All Iberian, Berlusconi assolto. "Falso in bilancio non è più reato"
438:
guilty if the statute of limitations is applied after conceding benefits for previous good conduct (i.e. it would be the first verdict of guilt), because such benefits can be granted only
1000:
280:
257:
970:
853:
Is it right that Silvio Berlusconi is not considered guilty because, according to the Italian Constitution, no enforceable judgement of guiltines was issued against him?
1058:
1054:
1040:
895:
Apart from a gross spelling error or typo , the translation of the Italian headline needs to be reworded slightly. Possibly: "False accounting no longer an offence" .
1016:
1155:
309:
997:
https://archive.is/20120920/http://www.ilsalvagente.it/Sezione.jsp?titolo=Berlusconi+incensurato?+S%EC,+ma+con+7+prescrizioni+e+2+amnistie&idSezione=4784
1001:
http://www.ilsalvagente.it/Sezione.jsp?titolo=Berlusconi%20incensurato%3F%20S%EC%2C%20ma%20con%207%20prescrizioni%20e%202%20amnistie&idSezione=4784
140:
1140:
228:
422:
There are many oustanding NPOV issues related to Berlusconi entry, but .. it keeps staying as it is .. biased and misleading. <AT SALUDI: -->
1150:
986:
234:
1125:
130:
1130:
1006:
945:
Somehow all the listed trials are under "Completed trials"- can someone who knows the detail fix this, please? Also apply any updates....
1026:
709:
454:
106:
522:
490:
378:
348:
1145:
1036:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
844:
Without this reference is almost impossible to understand the juridical situation of Silvio Berlusconi... So where's unappropriate?
1017:
https://web.archive.org/web/20131029195059/http://www.unita.it/italia/consulta-si-a-ricorso-di-di-pietro-contro-berlusconi-1.506963
863:
Let the users gather all the information and form an opinion for themselves without censoring useful and referenced sources!!!
1120:
33:
879:
97:
58:
1020:
535:
Answer : none. Technically speaking he was not found guilty: Berlusconi did not obtain benefits for previous good conduct.
1135:
1101:
1106:
929:
907:
883:
823:
733:
717:
667:
652:
624:
556:
530:
498:
462:
415:
386:
356:
199:
163:
990:
367:
The Italian version of this page includes other relevant information, e.g. drug trafficking, corruption and more. See
518:
benefits can be granted only after guilt is ascertained. ref sentence #5069 of the Corte di Cassazione, May 21, 1996
571:
Your argument are unconsistent. Scotland does not have a written constitution, instead the Italian Rupublic does:
950:
612:
1057:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1010:
987:
https://archive.is/20120920/http://www.lastampa.it/redazione/cmsSezioni/politica/200911articoli/49287girata.asp
729:
648:
925:
663:
620:
39:
458:
1092:
978:
713:
696:
the defendant is not considered guilty before the issuing of a final and unappealable sentence of guiltiness
382:
203:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
867:
705:
590:
the defendant is not considered guily before the issuing of a final and unappealable sentence of guiltiness
374:
344:
974:
526:
494:
434:
mean he is not guilty; at the very least it says nothing about guilt, and in fact it may indicate that he
352:
921:
810:
725:
659:
644:
616:
1076:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1064:
1007:
https://archive.is/20120920/http://www.javno.com/en-world/berlusconi-counts-cost-of-legal-battles_159057
105:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
977:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
615:). An alternative translation is "The defendant is considered not guilty prior to a final sentence ".
1027:
https://web.archive.org/web/20051018160637/http://www.ricercagiuridica.com/penale/visual.asp?num=2129
947:
903:
21:
443:
411:
368:
875:
1061:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1077:
783:
It is interesting to underline that the Italian Constitution incorporates the principle of the
1030:
819:
552:
1084:
899:
858:
So where is the lie? Where is the lack of encyclopaediac value of the information added?
1021:
http://www.unita.it/italia/consulta-si-a-ricorso-di-di-pietro-contro-berlusconi-1.506963
1043:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
407:
1083:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1050:
1114:
871:
673:
The Italian Court of Cassation is still subject to the Italian constitution up to now
521:
It would be great if someone could find out in which cases he is technically guilty.
991:
http://www.lastampa.it/redazione/cmsSezioni/politica/200911articoli/49287girata.asp
842:
I do not understand why the reference to the Italian Constitution is unappropriate.
89:
763:
Now I stressed that part where the Italian Constitution stated that the defendant
175:
157:
596:
Therefore Silvio Berlusconi has a clear record up to now and you introduction is
815:
548:
185:
1049:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
613:
http://www.senato.it/documenti/repository/istituzione/costituzione_inglese.pdf
547:
for a similar notion in Scots law and please stop this ludicrous vandalism. --
544:
513:
I have added the following as an introduction, based on the discussion above-
191:
181:
79:
369:
http://it.wikipedia.org/Procedimenti_giudiziari_a_carico_di_Silvio_Berlusconi
1011:
http://www.javno.com/en-world/berlusconi-counts-cost-of-legal-battles_159057
918:- The Section heading "Completed processes" should read "Completed trials";
398:
73:
52:
860:
Deleting information is not a good policy and you are doing precisely so!
777:
It is not so difficult to understand... That principle of law is called "
406:
no punishment is deserved because the statuste of limitation expired".--
447:
746:
L'imputato non è considerato colpevole sino alla condanna definitiva
687:
L'imputato non è considerato colpevole sino alla condanna definitiva
603:
The White Duke and DarTar are right. Also, let me make two points:
581:
L'imputato non è considerato colpevole sino alla condanna definitiva
272:
251:
102:
848:
Is it right that Silvio Berlusconi has a clear record up to now?
450:
204:
15:
1031:
http://www.ricercagiuridica.com/penale/visual.asp?num=2129
981:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
294:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography
643:
STATUE OF LIMITATION ISN'T A SENTENCE OF NOT GUILTY--
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1053:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
634:The italian Court of Cassation say more than once:
543:imply a verdict of "not guilt". See the article on
971:Trials and allegations involving Silvio Berlusconi
789:but it does not incorporates the principle of the
233:This article has not yet received a rating on the
1161:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
430:This is incorrect. The statutory limitation does
297:Template:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography
832:The reference to the constitution IS appropriate
489:In how many cases was he techically guilty then?
442:guilt is ascertained. See sentence #5069 of the
341:his perjury conviction is continually removed.
803:according to the Italian Constitution and law.
757:a final and unappealable sentence of guiltiness
1039:This message was posted before February 2018.
8:
743:Italian Constitution, Articolo 27, Comma 2:
795:Therefore Silvio Berlusconi is considered
246:
152:
47:
969:I have just modified 5 external links on
281:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography
809:I am afraid that the latest comment by
248:
154:
49:
19:
772:an enforceable judgement of guiltiness
1156:Low-importance Crime-related articles
509:Explanation of statute of limitations
7:
278:This article is within the scope of
197:This article is within the scope of
95:This article is within the scope of
539:Law that statutory limitation does
207:and the subjects encompassed by it.
38:It is of interest to the following
567:Italy as Scotland? Absolutely not!
14:
973:. Please take a moment to review
115:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Italy
740:Not guilty means... Not guilty!
271:
250:
184:
174:
156:
82:
72:
51:
20:
1141:Unknown-importance law articles
314:This article has been rated as
213:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Law
135:This article has been rated as
1151:C-Class Crime-related articles
956:21:22, 19 November 2011Â (UTC).
1:
1126:Mid-importance Italy articles
785:presumption of not guiltiness
779:presumption of not guiltiness
531:04:29, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
499:04:21, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
357:02:27, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
288:and see a list of open tasks.
109:and see a list of open tasks.
463:07:31, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
291:Crime and Criminal Biography
258:Crime and Criminal Biography
1131:All WikiProject Italy pages
1107:10:50, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
930:08:20, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
836:Are you serious or what?!?!
668:08:11, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
625:07:54, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
1177:
1070:(last update: 5 June 2024)
966:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
630:Italian Court of Cassation
423:07:04, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
416:14:03, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
320:project's importance scale
235:project's importance scale
141:project's importance scale
118:Template:WikiProject Italy
908:13:16, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
884:23:27, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
824:22:45, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
734:13:38, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
718:13:00, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
653:05:34, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
387:05:33, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
313:
266:
232:
169:
134:
67:
46:
1146:WikiProject Law articles
791:presumption of innocence
684:, Articolo 27, Comma 2:
578:, Articolo 27, Comma 2:
557:15:09, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
216:Template:WikiProject Law
962:External links modified
1121:C-Class Italy articles
770:before the issuing of
755:before the issuing of
300:Crime-related articles
28:This article is rated
767:not considered guilty
753:not considered guilty
397:I'm not sure whether
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1136:C-Class law articles
1051:regular verification
682:Italian Constitution
576:Italian Constitution
1041:After February 2018
444:Corte di Cassazione
371:-- R. 1 June 2009
1095:InternetArchiveBot
1046:InternetArchiveBot
34:content assessment
1071:
957:
887:
870:comment added by
751:the defendant is
708:comment added by
377:comment added by
359:
347:comment added by
334:
333:
330:
329:
326:
325:
245:
244:
241:
240:
151:
150:
147:
146:
98:WikiProject Italy
1168:
1105:
1096:
1069:
1068:
1047:
955:
886:
864:
720:
389:
363:More information
342:
302:
301:
298:
295:
292:
275:
268:
267:
262:
254:
247:
221:
220:
217:
214:
211:
194:
189:
188:
178:
171:
170:
160:
153:
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
85:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1176:
1175:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1111:
1110:
1099:
1094:
1062:
1055:have permission
1045:
979:this simple FaQ
964:
943:
915:
913:Mistranslations
893:
865:
834:
703:
675:
632:
600:unappropriate.
569:
511:
395:
372:
365:
339:
299:
296:
293:
290:
289:
260:
218:
215:
212:
209:
208:
200:WikiProject Law
190:
183:
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
83:
81:
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
1174:
1172:
1164:
1163:
1158:
1153:
1148:
1143:
1138:
1133:
1128:
1123:
1113:
1112:
1089:
1088:
1081:
1034:
1033:
1025:Added archive
1023:
1015:Added archive
1013:
1005:Added archive
1003:
995:Added archive
993:
985:Added archive
963:
960:
958:
942:
939:
937:
933:
922:Klimt.eastwood
919:
917:
914:
911:
892:
889:
859:
855:
843:
837:
833:
830:
829:
828:
827:
826:
811:The White Duke
794:
788:
782:
769:
764:
739:
726:The White Duke
691:
690:
674:
671:
660:Klimt.eastwood
645:The White Duke
631:
628:
617:Klimt.eastwood
585:
584:
568:
565:
564:
563:
562:
561:
560:
559:
519:
510:
507:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
468:
467:
466:
465:
425:
424:
394:
391:
364:
361:
338:
335:
332:
331:
328:
327:
324:
323:
316:Low-importance
312:
306:
305:
303:
286:the discussion
276:
264:
263:
261:Low‑importance
255:
243:
242:
239:
238:
231:
225:
224:
222:
196:
195:
179:
167:
166:
161:
149:
148:
145:
144:
137:Mid-importance
133:
127:
126:
124:
121:Italy articles
107:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
62:Mid‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1173:
1162:
1159:
1157:
1154:
1152:
1149:
1147:
1144:
1142:
1139:
1137:
1134:
1132:
1129:
1127:
1124:
1122:
1119:
1118:
1116:
1109:
1108:
1103:
1098:
1097:
1086:
1082:
1079:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1066:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1042:
1037:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1002:
998:
994:
992:
988:
984:
983:
982:
980:
976:
972:
967:
961:
959:
953:
952:
949:
940:
938:
935:
931:
927:
923:
912:
910:
909:
905:
901:
896:
890:
888:
885:
881:
877:
873:
869:
861:
856:
854:
850:
849:
845:
840:
831:
825:
821:
817:
812:
808:
807:
806:
805:
804:
802:
798:
792:
786:
780:
775:
773:
768:
761:
759:
758:
754:
749:TRANSLATION:
748:
747:
741:
736:
735:
731:
727:
721:
719:
715:
711:
710:151.16.70.136
707:
700:
698:
697:
693:TRANSLATION:
689:
688:
683:
680:
679:
678:
672:
670:
669:
665:
661:
655:
654:
650:
646:
641:
638:
635:
629:
627:
626:
622:
618:
614:
608:
604:
601:
599:
594:
592:
591:
587:TRANSLATION:
583:
582:
577:
574:
573:
572:
566:
558:
554:
550:
546:
542:
537:
536:
534:
533:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
515:
514:
508:
500:
496:
492:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
464:
460:
456:
455:78.53.201.220
452:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
428:
427:
426:
420:
419:
418:
417:
413:
409:
405:
400:
392:
390:
388:
384:
380:
376:
370:
362:
360:
358:
354:
350:
346:
336:
321:
317:
311:
308:
307:
304:
287:
283:
282:
277:
274:
270:
269:
265:
259:
256:
253:
249:
236:
230:
227:
226:
223:
206:
202:
201:
193:
187:
182:
180:
177:
173:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
155:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1093:
1090:
1065:source check
1044:
1038:
1035:
968:
965:
946:
944:
936:
916:
897:
894:
862:
857:
852:
851:
847:
846:
841:
839:Berlusconi.
835:
800:
796:
790:
784:
778:
776:
771:
766:
762:
756:
752:
750:
745:
744:
742:
737:
722:
701:
695:
694:
692:
686:
685:
681:
676:
656:
642:
639:
636:
633:
609:
605:
602:
597:
595:
589:
588:
586:
580:
579:
575:
570:
540:
523:93.96.148.42
512:
491:93.96.148.42
439:
435:
431:
403:
396:
379:62.101.81.13
366:
349:93.96.148.42
340:
315:
279:
219:law articles
198:
136:
96:
90:Italy portal
40:WikiProjects
891:Reference 2
866:—Preceding
738:But wtf...
704:—Preceding
373:—Preceding
343:—Preceding
205:legal field
1115:Categories
1102:Report bug
951:Farmbrough
900:Ombudswiki
799:, but not
797:not guilty
545:Not proven
192:Law portal
1085:this tool
1078:this tool
408:Pokipsy76
399:Acquittal
393:Acquittal
1091:Cheers.—
941:Sections
880:contribs
872:Insilvis
868:unsigned
801:innocent
706:unsigned
598:at least
375:unsigned
345:unsigned
975:my edit
337:Perjury
318:on the
139:on the
30:C-class
816:DarTar
549:DarTar
476:system
448:May 21
36:scale.
440:after
112:Italy
103:Italy
59:Italy
948:Rich
926:talk
904:talk
876:talk
820:talk
730:talk
714:talk
664:talk
649:talk
621:talk
553:talk
527:talk
495:talk
459:talk
451:1996
412:talk
383:talk
353:talk
1059:RfC
1029:to
1019:to
1009:to
999:to
989:to
765:is
541:not
432:not
404:but
310:Low
229:???
210:Law
164:Law
131:Mid
1117::
1072:.
1067:}}
1063:{{
954:,
932:;
928:)
906:)
882:)
878:•
822:)
787:,
781:".
774:.
760:.
732:)
724:--
716:)
699:.
666:)
651:)
623:)
593:.
555:)
529:)
497:)
461:)
453:.
446:,
436:is
414:)
385:)
355:)
1104:)
1100:(
1087:.
1080:.
924:(
902:(
874:(
818:(
793:.
728:(
712:(
662:(
647:(
619:(
611:(
551:(
525:(
493:(
457:(
410:(
381:(
351:(
322:.
237:.
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
