Talk:Tropical Storm Kai-tak

2330:"From December 15-18, the storm made landfall in the Visayas archipelago, including the island of Palawan, later leaving the Philippines. On December 15, the storm later weakened and intensified. On December 16. the storm weakened into a tropical depression, then returned back on December 20." - I've pointed out several times that the dates need to be sequential. The part on the 15th - "the storm later weakened and intensified" doesn't seem accurate, since every warning center had it weakening that day. Please rewrite this section, taking the time to mention the Samar landfall first on the 16th, then the storm moving through the Visayas, then the Palawan landfall on the 18th. Also, it should be clearer that it reintensified back to a tropical storm. The "returned back" is ambiguous. 295: 1044:"Power lines in 39 settlements toppled and some bridges fell to the ground." - these are two different ideas that could both be split up. First, power outages happen in a lot of storms, so that's good to have here, but was there a number of people affected by the power outages? How long until they were fixed? As for the bridges, that's some pretty decent infrastructure damage, so maybe specify which bridges, if you can find that. It could be useful to have the bridge collapses alongside any other damaged roads or infrastructure, like if any were washed out by landslides or floods. 2398:"On December 20, during the storm, analysis showed that the strongest part of the storm was over the South China Sea, with another part drifting over Palawan because of a general flow of the South China Sea." - I'm still not really sure what this even means. Does the "general flow" refer to the storm's path? If so, you need to mention to be clearer. The storm turned southwestward on the 17th. Also, it sounds like the center split into two, but that's not the case - every warning center had a landfall on Palawan. So, maybe remove this section, or rewrite it with the previous part. 2337:"On December 15, the storm later weakened and intensified. " - this isn't true, it didn't intensify that day, which I said before. Also, you still haven't said that Kai-tak reintensified into a tropical storm. You say "the storm", which seems more like a generic name for Kai-tak than a tropical storm, but considering you have the part where it weakened to a TD, you need to say it became a TS again. Also, as I've asked a few times, what happened to allow for its restrengthening? Did convection redevelop after shear dropped? This part of the met history is lacking. ♫ 267: 348: 327: 1160:

storm's path and how strong it was. Like, why did it move southwestward toward Malaysia? The JTWC prognostic reasoning has that - it was due to a subtropical ridge and the general flow of the South China Sea. That sort of information needs to be in the article so it can be considered "good". So try integrating more stuff like "The storm turned due to the ridge", rather than "NASA reported". We'll be able to tell the information was from NASA, or whoever, based on the references, so it's not needed in prose, just a head's up.

2179::* to keep everything aligned. I included "Reply..." under the first point. I prefer it that way, because I noticed that you replied to some of my comments above, but they were struck out, so I didn't even notice you replied. You can just say "Done" if you want to address a comment, but again, I prefer a comment under each point. I emphasize that because I don't think the article can be classified as "good" yet, although it's on the way, and your edits are improving the article. ♫ 148: 255: 1808:" On December 20, during the storm, analysis showed that the strongest part of the storm was hovering over the South China Sea, with another part hovering over Palawan because of a general flow of the South China Sea" - this is after December 23rd. The met history should be in chronological order. Also, "hover" is odd here, since the storm extends well into the atmosphere, so it's not really hovering. See the other part about the Palawan landfall. 358: 2360:. I can give you exact wording if you want. After saying Kai-tak weakened to a depression, you need to say it re-intensified into a tropical storm, that's the issue here. Just "storm" isn't enough, since sometimes that's used as a generic term for cyclone. Kai-tak also re-reached its peak intensity. But the wording here doesn't suggest that. Also, please add stuff from JTWC prognostic reasoning to indicate why it restrengthened. ♫ 1714:" The storm later weakened and intensified on the same day." - this means nothing when "the same day" has no context. The last time you specified the date was the 13th, so please add a few more date references here. What I'm looking for is some mention of Kai-tak becoming a tropical storm again, which will also require mentioning when it weakened to a tropical depression, and when it weakened back to a tropical depression. 21: 138: 107: 751: 719: 694: 666: 652: 622: 604: 590: 576: 536: 76: 3409: 769: 502: 3046: 793: 863: 436: 2662:), just checking how you're doing with those last few issues (JMA intensity in the article, when the storm reintensified into a TS, and the titles in the references). It's not that much holding back it being a good article, and I'm quite thankful for all you've done so far, I just hope my review hasn't been too much! It's right on the precipice. ♫ 2913: 2510: 2143: 2117: 2088: 2064: 2040: 1993: 1945: 1918: 1894: 1870: 1819: 1725: 1679: 1644: 1592: 1567: 1538: 2856:

shear weakened it back to a depression on Y date. Also, because of where you added ref 11, it implies the met history 2nd paragraph is all sourced to ref 11, but that only covers the bit about it re-intensifying. Also, check the rounding for the peak intensity, that isn't rounding properly (compared to the infobox). ♫

2855:

Do you need exact wording? You still haven't made it explicit that the depression restrengthened into a tropical storm. That's what I'm looking for. Something like "After a decrease in wind shear, the thunderstorms increased, and Kai-tak became a tropical storm again on X date. However, stronger wind

1610:

for the JMA peak intensity (listed as Tokyo here). Also, what you have is incorrect. Kai-tak didn't reach peak winds "three hours later" after the 21:00 UTC when JTWC started advisories. Again, using IBTRACs, Kai-tak peaked at 12:00 on the 14th. You should mention the date. Also there's nothing about

1335:

for another tropical cyclone that hit the Philippines, and the sort of information that should be in the meteorological history. Right now, you have stuff like "had a rainfall rate of 7.59 inches per hour..", which belongs in the impact section. And again, you don't have the conversion for the units.

3049:

Article is in good shape, recently promoted to GA. The hook checks, though the provided source on bulldozers was incorrect -- I have changed it. It might not be the most interesting, given that trucks and bulldozers are commonly used in disaster recovery operations -- could you perhaps suggest a few

2615:

Still some of the same problems, so here's an update: Double check the JMA peak intensity, how it's listed in the infobox and in the Met history, and make sure the units are rounded where appropriate, and in the right order. Also, still an issue with Kai-tak re-intensifying into a TS - please expand

2131:

You need to specify better about the note saying " Idea originally made by China and Hong Kong." Right now, that implies the Typhoon Committee was an idea made by China and Hong Kong. Given that Hong Kong is in China, I'm not sure the difference you're trying to make here, or what the note is trying

2077:"A local Mormon church in Tanauan, Leyte donated supplies to students from Sacme, a local farming village" - why is this significant enough to be mentioned? The rest of the aftermath is pretty broad, not going into much detail about the aftermath in any one area, so this one stood out as unnecessary. 2739:

No, as I've said several times, you need to add Kai-tak reintensified back into a tropical storm. You just say "storm", and then don't specify how strong it got, or what allowed it to re-strengthen. As to the references, no, that wasn't correct. I said that the title should be "Significant Tropical

2212:

There's still an unconverted instance of "400 kilometer ". Please add imperial units. But otherwise, just a few minor things left, which I replied to above. I really appreciate all of the work on the article. Apologies if I was a bit of a stickler, but it's making the article much better, and since

1346:

I think you might've converted some things wrong, like with "400 km2 (150 sq mi)". The original source says "400-kilometer diameter" and "500-km diameter", not square kilometers, which would imply area, not just distance. You converted this unit wrong, that's what I'm telling you. It should just be

2815:

I fixed the titles. You had a spacing issue caused by copying the text from the source (which went to another line like if you hit the enter button), so in the future you should manually write out the titles, making sure the capicalization is consistent with the rest of the article (INSTEAD OF ALL

1658:

Yea that works. I like using "meandered" or "drifted" in these cases, since JTWC had it making a loop, but JMA had it go east first, and then curve back to the west. You should also add the date for the Samar landfall, maybe something like "Over the next two days, Kai-tak meandered off the eastern

1159:

That relies on NASA to tell the narrative of the storm, when it should just describe the storm narrative. Kai-tak moved across the Philippines. Why did it move the way it did? How strong was it at what time? IBTRACS has the time and date for both landfalls. The storm history should describe the

2103:

On December 21, 2017, the PAGASA announced that the name Urduja had been retired from their naming lists after causing more than Php1 billion (US17 million) worth of damage, also never using it again as a typhoon name within the Philippine Area of Responsibility (PAR)." - could you improve the

1330:

You're overly broad in a few areas that need some more detail. For example - "Over the following days, the storm made landfall over the South China Sea before dying out on December 23." This could and should be expanded significantly. First, identify where the storm made landfall. Also, you're

1981:

Could you organize the Philippines so you have a paragraph covering general impacts in the country, such as the overall deaths, damage total, overall houses damaged, number of people left homeless, whatever other nationwide statistics you can find. Right now the impact section still feels

1633:"The next day, the storm started moving towards Eastern Samar, then moved towards the other direction. The next day, the storm made landfall towards the Samar Island." - this doesn't make sense. Moved toward Samar, then the other direction, then it made landfall toward the island? 1883:" Parts of the storm also were classified as "very cold" and supposedly also brang rainfall.[" - this should be cut. "Brang" isn't a word, the rainfall is already mentioned in the impacts, and I'm not sure what it means when part of a storm are classified as "Very cold". 1192:

I highly suggest you expand on the meteorological history, and add more from ReliefWeb, plus, a few local sources would be nice. I only started the review today, and you're already on the right track, so I don't think it should take more than seven days to do that,

2744:

listed wrong. These three issues have been the three issues holding back the article. Do you need me to be more explicit, or need help with addressing them? For example, you can use the advisories to point out the restrengthening/weakening in South China Sea.

1611:

the storm structure at its peak. The last reference to the storm structure was "Despite the system being poorly organized with loose banding". Or for that matter, what was it like at landfall? Did the storm always remain poorly organized with loose banding? ♫

1331:

missing a pretty significant part of Kai-tak's meteorological history, namely it reintensifying on December 20. Both JTWC and JMA have the storm reintensifying that day. What allowed the storm to reintensify then? And why did it get so weak as well? Check out

2251:"On December 14, at approximately 12:00 UTC, Kai-tak reached its peak intensity, with 46 miles per hour (74 km/h) winds monitored from Tokyo." - this should be rounded, and km/h should be first. Also, please be consistent, use JMA, not "monitored from Tokyo". 2281:. The infobox and the prose aren't consistent. I see the infobox has the peak listed at 38 knots - is there a reason it isn't listed as 40 knots per the BT, which would make it 75 km/h (and not 70)? Also, the metric units need to go first, not second. ♫ 2461:"Over the following days, the storm weakened and made landfall over the South China Sea." - you already mentioned the Palawan landfall, so I don't think this is right, that there were any more landfalls. It looks like the storm remained over water. 2488:

The references need to have titles, not just say "Archived copy". Ref 1 for example should have a title saying "Significant Tropical Weather Advisory for the Western and South Pacific Oceans Reissued". Please add titles for refs 1, 2, 5, and 6. ♫

1738:

Not quite. There's nothing about when Kai-tak weakened to a depression, and when it became a tropical storm again. The met history really glosses over this part of the storm, so please expand more here, maybe add how it was able to reintensify? ♫

1982:

disorganized, so having that second impact paragraph split up into two would be useful, and the second paragraph could cover the information by individual areas. Also, should the number of evacuees be in the preparation paragraph or impact?

1083:

Creating an edit fixing some of the problems, anyway, in all the sources I see, they only mention deaths in Biliran and Leyte, which would probably fail the no original research criteria, and what does the second point mean? Thanks,

1152:"On December 20, during the storm, NASA's Aqua satellite took a picture of the tropical storm. The analysis showed that the strongest part of the storm was hovering over the South China Sea, with another part hovering over Palawan." 2570:

So just to recap, there's still an issue with the JMA peak intensity (rounding/unit ordering/matching the infobox), the met history after the Philippines (namely it intensifying to a TS), and two issues with references. ♫

1030:

304: 121: 1580:

Did the storm structure change at all after its formation? There's nothing about Kai-tak reaching peak winds on the 14th. Be sure to mention the peak intensity. Did it start to become more organized then, I'm

3134:. Can you find anything in the article that would meet that -- for example, things which apply only to this particular storm, or might otherwise be surprising and motivate a reader to click on the article? 1355:- who said this? Could you rewrite it to avoid using those exact words, since I don't think those words are important enough to be an exact quote. You could also say "prepare" instead of that entire quote. 1907:"On December 18, NASA said that the storm was about 20 knots and had a rainfall rate of 192.786 millimetres (7.5900 in) per hour." - be consistent with the units. The infobox uses km/h and mph, not knots. 414: 2007:

Yea only the third paragraph should be second. The death totals and damage totals are the important pieces of information, so that should come after preparations, but before the breakdown by area. ♫

3508: 1855:"Heavy rainfall was also predicted from a 400 km (250 mi)." - I think you're missing a word here. Also, rather than predictions, could you add some actual rainfall totals for the Philippines? 1336:

For an article to be considered "good", it needs to have metric and imperial units. So in this case, inches should be converted to millimeters, which should go first, and the inches go second.

3273:

the rescue operation, though. I don't know the source very well but it smells a bit local/tabloidy to me -- have I read that wrong, or do we have a more authoritative source to corroborate?

2408:

Please add a proper source for the 266 deaths. I didn't say get rid of that, just to get a better source, since Tembin's passage soon after is a pretty important part of Kai-tak's story. ♫

1002:

Similar to converting units, be sure to have both Philippine pesos and USD, and be consistent how you're presenting them. One time it's "Php3.747 billion" and another time it says "pesos"

1856: 2965: 2816:

CAPS). Now it's just the issue of Kai-tak restrengthening into a tropical storm. Please use the links above to add information about how Kai-tak restrengthened into a tropical storm -

442: 3008: 868: 2178:

So that's my review. I would ask that you don't strike out my comments, and instead reply to each comment. You can insert a new line underneath my comments and put <nowiki: -->

465:, I checked the article with the GA criteria, and only saw some minor problems probably landing the article on hold. Here is my mini-review, so you can relax yourself for a bit. 2934:"After a decrease in wind shear, the thunderstorms increased, and Kai-tak became a tropical storm again on . However, stronger wind shear weakened it back to a depression on ." 2753:

for Kai-tak weakening again due to wind shear. Lastly, this part doesn't make sense now - "Over the following days, the storm weakened and affected over the South China Sea."

1147:, using prognostic reasoning from JTWC to describe the storm's path, structure, and more in general about its meteorological history. Here's an example of where it falls short. 3493: 3060: 2756:

I hate to be picky, but this is a retired storm, and some of the issues I pointed out I pointed out several times, so I'm sticking with it. Let me know if you have questions

404: 480: 3059:, but that is not strictly a requirement for GA, and the article would also benefit from some further copyediting. I can find no evidence of the supposed CC1.0 licence on 901: 524: 380: 184: 3463: 285: 1048:

What do you mean in your note that the Typhoon Committee was "Idea originally made by China and Hong Kong."? Or did you mean the name was originally submitted by them?

179: 3478: 309: 3224: 3468: 891: 209: 3488: 2824:. I've been pointing out for a long time that this passage of the article is still lacking, so I'm going to stay insistent that this portion needs expansion. ♫ 743: 371: 332: 1173:

Speaking of units, everything should probably be in UTC time by default, but if you want to mention local time, it might be useful to use a note. Check out

1012:

The impact should be organized by hierarchy of information. Both paragraphs mention storm deaths. But ideally that would be mentioned in the same paragraph.

3458: 3064: 2993: 1668:

The landfall on the 18th on Palawan island is missing. Right now it says "another part hovering over Palawan", which might count, but it should be clearer.

3126:

Again, I'm not sure we've passed the threshold of interest there -- most tropical storms do that, and it's not particularly interesting that they do. Per

873: 528: 520: 245: 199: 32: 3473: 3384: 1177:, which has a few instances of a note that indicates the local time. That is, if you need to indicate the exact time at all. Sometimes you don't need to. 2458:

It's not done though... you keep having a lot of the same issues as before, namely the peak intensity, and its restrengthening. Also, this seems wrong:

2258:

The rounding is inconsistent with the infobox. First, make sure metric units are first, and second, make sure the values are the same as the infobox. ♫

1184:

You say you couldn't find certain information, that's fine, but I wanted to check if you've searched for information from local sources? Also, have you

280: 117: 3308:

Great -- I've made a couple of my own tweaks for grammar, repetition and concision. We don't generally consider local news or tabloid journalism to be

3498: 1144: 1041:

Any other examples of the infrastructure or agriculture damage? You say that's the source of the damage without going into much detail in this regard.

582: 512: 3453: 235: 204: 189: 3443: 3186: 46: 3483: 3166:

Please provide a QPQ as soon as possible, as the nomination may be closed without warning if one is not given within a reasonable timeframe.

761: 470: 194: 3290:

Yep, definitely local. But the source is regional, and has a three-or-four person editorial team, changed the wording of the hook a bit.

2996: 2707: 962: 3438: 2740:

Weather Advisory for the Western and South Pacific Oceans Reissued". Right now it's just random coding. Also the JMA peak intensity is

757: 568: 516: 3448: 2767: 2659: 1322: 1204: 940: 896: 680: 476: 450:

to receive a broader perspective on how it may be improved. Please make any edits you see fit to improve the quality of this article.

38: 3503: 1168:

As for rounding units, I was pointing out that 81 mi isn't rounded. The 130 km is rounded, so the other unit should also be rounded.

1366:

Please add USD for "Php184 million" and " ₱1 billion". Also, please be consistent with how you identify Philippine currency totals.

1038:

You've accounted for a province breakdown for just 26 of the deaths - 23 in Biliran and 3 in Leyte. Where were the other 57 deaths?

596: 172: 161: 112: 919: 53: 87: 3067:, but both should be PD as the work of a US government employee. I can find no other copyvio, BLP or other serious concerns. 2401:

I also noticed, ref 39 does not cover the information about Tembin's deaths. Please get a proper source for the 266 deaths.

1188:, which has a list of 92 sources relating to the storm? Some of that might be able to help add information to the article. 3056: 818:

This is just a mini-review, not to be taken seriously, you can base off it if you like, but don't list the article yet.

294: 2157:

Oh, that's still confusing then if you say "Idea". You should say "replacement name provided by China" or something. ♫

1556:

between a subtropical ridge over the western Pacific and another over the Bay of Bengal, plus another one to its south)

508: 3182: 3132:

The hook should be likely to be perceived as unusual or intriguing by readers with no special knowledge or interest

554: 3417: 3353: 3329:

What do you mean? The journal itself made national news on other news sources or the journal made national news?

3314: 3275: 3246: 3136: 3074: 1552:

The met history is still very short. Why did the system barely move for three days between December 11 to 14th? (

1460:

Can't find the imperial equivalent of the "kilometer-diameter", is it okay to just have the original equivalent?

2890:

OK, so the wording I just gave, do you think you could handle that, and add the references for the following? ♫

915: 658: 644: 272: 447: 347: 326: 93: 1931: 2896: 2862: 2830: 2776: 2701: 2668: 2638: 2622: 2577: 2537: 2495: 2473: 2433: 2414: 2366: 2343: 2316: 2287: 2264: 2219: 2185: 2163: 2013: 1965: 1839: 1745: 1698: 1617: 1480: 1448: 1412: 1377: 1213: 1072: 956: 671:

Good! Everything is okay, the article does not go too deep in a rabbit hole, and follows the major aspects.

614: 610: 3396: 3334: 3295: 3256: 3231: 3215: 3167: 3109: 3095: 3033: 3019: 2982: 2925: 2881: 2845: 2806: 2792: 2761: 2715: 2687: 2653: 2606: 2552: 2522: 2449: 2381: 2234: 2203: 1791: 1766: 1513: 1495: 1465: 1433: 1397: 1316: 1271: 1250: 1229: 1198: 1174: 1124: 1103: 1089: 934: 837: 823: 803: 1780: 20: 379:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1298: 1288: 42: 1490:

I don't think the standard equivalents will be affective over different types, including diameters.

1293: 147: 3127: 733: 3220: 2907: 2891: 2873: 2857: 2825: 2771: 2697: 2663: 2633: 2617: 2596: 2572: 2532: 2490: 2468: 2428: 2409: 2361: 2338: 2311: 2282: 2259: 2214: 2180: 2158: 2008: 1960: 1834: 1758: 1740: 1693: 1612: 1475: 1443: 1425: 1407: 1389: 1372: 1261: 1240: 1208: 1114: 1067: 952: 363: 3102: 1607: 1140: 972:

I'll be reviewing this for good article status. Right off the bat, there are some decent issues

559: 171:

and related subjects on Knowledge (XXG). To participate, help improve this article or visit the

1181:

There's a few more unconverted damage totals. Would you mind adding a few more USD conversions?

3393: 3331: 3292: 3269:

I think the text of that one is good -- perhaps creates the false suggestion that the NPA was

3253: 3228: 3161: 3106: 3030: 3015: 2922: 2878: 2842: 2803: 2789: 2757: 2712: 2684: 2649: 2603: 2549: 2519: 2446: 2378: 2231: 2200: 1788: 1763: 1510: 1492: 1462: 1430: 1394: 1312: 1282: 1268: 1247: 1226: 1194: 1121: 1100: 1086: 1061:

All the aid information provided here (at least that I know of) is created by the Philippines.

930: 834: 820: 800: 997:

As I mentioned on your talk page, be sure to convert units like "4.1–14 meters over in Samar"

2682:), after it hopefully becomes a good article, I will work on this, thank you and good luck! 254: 3348: 3309: 1776: 807: 1332: 1023: 153: 3432: 3388: 2801:

Done with the last problem.. I think? If it's still wrong, can you be more explicit?

1761:

Kai tak did not weaken to a depression, but weakened 5-10 knots, is it broad enough?

992:

The "analysis" part doesn't need its own section, it's redundant with the met history

3351:

that supports this hook -- for instance, a piece of national or international news?

1185: 977:

The lead should be two paragraphs ideally. Try expanding it to include more impacts.

3423: 3400: 3359: 3338: 3320: 3299: 3281: 3260: 3235: 3190: 3142: 3113: 3080: 3037: 2980:... that the government used military trucks and bulldozers to rescue people from 2929: 2901: 2885: 2867: 2849: 2835: 2810: 2796: 2781: 2719: 2691: 2673: 2643: 2627: 2610: 2582: 2556: 2542: 2526: 2500: 2478: 2453: 2444:

Everything done except the paragraph one, what do you want on the two paragraphs?

2438: 2419: 2385: 2371: 2348: 2321: 2292: 2269: 2238: 2224: 2207: 2190: 2168: 2018: 1970: 1844: 1795: 1770: 1750: 1703: 1622: 1517: 1499: 1485: 1469: 1453: 1437: 1417: 1401: 1382: 1301: 1275: 1254: 1233: 1218: 1128: 1107: 1093: 1077: 966: 944: 841: 827: 1017:

Are there any observations, like rainfall totals or wind speeds, from the storm?

376: 137: 106: 3408: 987:

The meteorological history is incomplete. It only goes up to the JMA naming it.

3045: 1371:

The article is certainly on its way, but there are still a few issues left. ♫

353: 262: 143: 1098:

For also the third to the last point, I can't find any of that information.

922:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. 1057:

Did the Philippines provide any aid or other assistance in the aftermath?

375:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the 1527:

The first sentence should specify that the Visayas are in the Philippines

2213:

the storm was retired, there should be some extra care and attention. ♫

1599:

Saw that the storm structure was already mentioned, did the other thing.

435: 2616:

on that. And lastly, still issues with references not having titles. ♫

1139:

I suggest rewriting the end of the meteorological history using either

1026:

somewhere in the aftermath, since that storm was just a few days later.

167: 1775:

Kai-tak weakened to a depression on the 16th, per IBTRACS, as well as

3100: 2821: 2817: 2750: 2746: 1553: 1353:'Residents were already advised to "undertake appropriate measures" 1245:

Added 7 sources, the only thing to do is the Nasa problem checking.

1035:

Can't find anything else regarding the area in the convert template.

627:

Everything is good enough, but a large similarity to two sources.

2104:

grammar in the last part? "also never using it again" feels odd.

2679: 430: 69: 15: 1361:

I just wanted to check, did you get anything from ReliefWeb?

1291:

if you need to write or rewrite the meteorological history.

1659:

coast, before making landfall on the island on December 16."

293: 253: 2787:

Done with the titles, but it says that it has a line feed.

2632:

I fixed the infobox, so it read 40 kt, instead of 38 kt. ♫

1143:(which has the JMA and JTWC positions and intensities), or 3213:...that while soldiers carried out relief operations for 982:

Round units where appropriate - " about 130 km (81 mi) "

2970: 2961: 59: 3009:

Template:Did you know nominations/Manuel Osa Nsue Nsua

1066:

So the article is decent, it just needs a bit more. ♫

2467:. There was no landfall after Kai-tak hit Palawan. ♫ 1442:

My mistake, it looked kind of unusual for a title. ♫

2310:

A good place to split might be when it was named. ♫

1952:

To be clear, the report states Brunei, not Malaysia.

3061:

File:Kai-tak imerg 13-18 december 2017 animated.gif

2029:

What's the source for the "Sofronio Dacillo" quote?

774:

A bit suspicious on the captions for image 3 and 4.

541:

Everything is okay, just needs a bit of a copyedit.

3509:Articles that have been nominated for Did you know 1606:But it still needs to mention the peak intensity. 2376:Just asking, which source is the JTWC reasoning? 1934:are missing, such as flash floods and landslides. 1224:Done with the Nasa problem, just needs checking. 737:and other media, where possible and appropriate. 3055:I would like to see source data information for 389:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Tambayan Philippines 45:. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can 3312:-- did it make national or international news? 1341:Fix ref 23. Right now it has a URL in the ref. 1007:The preparations should be their own paragraph 3347:Do we have a source that would qualify under 2601:Everything is okay now, just needs checking. 742:(images are tagged and non-free content have 8: 1347:km, not km squared. That happens a few time. 3065:File:Analysis of Tropical Storm Kai-Tak.jpg 2531:Check refs 1, 2, 5, 6 for titles to fix. ♫ 3494:Mid-importance Philippine-related articles 3099:weakened and strengthened multiple times? 1474:You should convert kilometers to miles. ♫ 851: 321: 101: 2820:- and then why it weakened - you can use 392:Template:WikiProject Tambayan Philippines 3464:Mid-importance Tropical cyclone articles 2678:Sorry! Just a bit busy with another GA ( 1833:Again, what do you mean with "hover"? ♫ 3479:Mid-importance Pacific typhoon articles 2303:Could you split MH into two paragraphs? 882: 854: 323: 103: 3469:WikiProject Tropical cyclones articles 3131: 2150:I actually meant the replacement name. 1508:Fixed everything, just needs checking. 446:has been made for this article to be 7: 3489:GA-Class Philippine-related articles 3026:. Nominator has 18 past nominations. 2547:Fixed them, is it the proper title? 2427:So similar issues as with before. ♫ 369:This article is within the scope of 159:This article is within the scope of 75: 73: 3014:Improved to Good Article status by 1545:Changed to the Philippines instead. 220:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Weather 92:It is of interest to the following 3459:GA-Class Tropical cyclone articles 1783:. So be sure to get that, plus it 768: 501: 14: 3474:GA-Class Pacific typhoon articles 2198:Done with everything (I think?). 41:. If you can improve it further, 3499:WikiProject Philippines articles 3407: 3044: 2911: 2508: 2485:Also, check ref 5, it's broken. 2141: 2115: 2086: 2062: 2038: 1991: 1943: 1916: 1892: 1868: 1817: 1723: 1677: 1642: 1590: 1565: 1536: 1392:I got 3 sources from ReliefWeb. 791: 767: 749: 717: 692: 689:Fair representation without bias 664: 650: 620: 602: 588: 574: 534: 500: 434: 372:WikiProject Tambayan Philippines 356: 346: 325: 265: 146: 136: 105: 74: 19: 3454:Mid-importance Weather articles 3209:Ooh! Found an interesting one. 1859:which has some rainfall totals. 1022:It's probably worth mentioning 920:Talk:Tropical Storm Kai-tak/GA1 792: 409:This article has been rated as 240:This article has been rated as 3444:Natural sciences good articles 3424:06:12, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3401:04:20, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 3360:13:37, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 3339:11:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 3321:10:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 3300:09:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 3282:06:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 3261:04:45, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 3236:04:36, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 2749:with when it became a TS, and 1311:A few notes about your edits, 699:Probably suspicious, but okay. 497:(prose, spelling, and grammar) 477:here for what the criteria are 305:the Pacific typhoon work group 33:Natural sciences good articles 29:has been listed as one of the 1: 3439:Knowledge (XXG) good articles 724:Don't see any in the history. 383:and see a list of open tasks. 302:This article is supported by 281:WikiProject Tropical cyclones 278:This article is supported by 3484:WikiProject Weather articles 3057:File:Urduja 17 Animation.gif 3022:). Number of QPQs required: 1406:Sweet, I appreciate that. ♫ 750: 718: 693: 665: 651: 621: 603: 589: 575: 535: 223:Template:WikiProject Weather 3191:09:53, 29 August 2024 (UTC) 3143:08:45, 27 August 2024 (UTC) 3114:04:36, 27 August 2024 (UTC) 3081:16:16, 26 August 2024 (UTC) 3038:01:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC) 2930:23:15, 25 August 2024 (UTC) 2902:23:07, 25 August 2024 (UTC) 2886:23:04, 25 August 2024 (UTC) 2868:17:41, 25 August 2024 (UTC) 2850:08:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC) 2836:17:28, 23 August 2024 (UTC) 2811:01:58, 23 August 2024 (UTC) 2797:01:20, 23 August 2024 (UTC) 2782:16:20, 22 August 2024 (UTC) 2720:09:16, 22 August 2024 (UTC) 2692:03:53, 21 August 2024 (UTC) 2674:16:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 2644:03:14, 19 August 2024 (UTC) 2628:19:08, 17 August 2024 (UTC) 2611:06:37, 17 August 2024 (UTC) 2583:18:50, 15 August 2024 (UTC) 2557:04:33, 22 August 2024 (UTC) 2543:17:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC) 2527:12:52, 21 August 2024 (UTC) 2501:19:08, 17 August 2024 (UTC) 2479:19:08, 17 August 2024 (UTC) 2454:05:25, 15 August 2024 (UTC) 2439:18:44, 14 August 2024 (UTC) 2420:18:50, 15 August 2024 (UTC) 2386:12:50, 21 August 2024 (UTC) 2372:19:08, 17 August 2024 (UTC) 2349:18:50, 15 August 2024 (UTC) 2322:18:50, 15 August 2024 (UTC) 2293:19:08, 17 August 2024 (UTC) 2270:18:50, 15 August 2024 (UTC) 2239:05:31, 14 August 2024 (UTC) 2229:Everything looks good now. 2225:20:26, 13 August 2024 (UTC) 2208:08:44, 13 August 2024 (UTC) 2191:18:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC) 2169:20:26, 13 August 2024 (UTC) 2019:20:26, 13 August 2024 (UTC) 1971:20:26, 13 August 2024 (UTC) 1845:20:26, 13 August 2024 (UTC) 1796:05:30, 14 August 2024 (UTC) 1771:22:54, 13 August 2024 (UTC) 1751:20:26, 13 August 2024 (UTC) 1704:20:26, 13 August 2024 (UTC) 1623:20:26, 13 August 2024 (UTC) 1518:04:49, 12 August 2024 (UTC) 1500:08:44, 13 August 2024 (UTC) 1486:18:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC) 1470:04:43, 12 August 2024 (UTC) 1454:22:42, 11 August 2024 (UTC) 1438:22:40, 11 August 2024 (UTC) 1418:22:34, 11 August 2024 (UTC) 1402:22:33, 11 August 2024 (UTC) 1383:18:49, 11 August 2024 (UTC) 1302:03:07, 11 August 2024 (UTC) 1276:01:59, 11 August 2024 (UTC) 1255:00:59, 11 August 2024 (UTC) 1234:00:39, 11 August 2024 (UTC) 1219:00:14, 11 August 2024 (UTC) 1129:23:18, 10 August 2024 (UTC) 1108:22:46, 10 August 2024 (UTC) 1094:22:44, 10 August 2024 (UTC) 1078:15:29, 10 August 2024 (UTC) 967:15:29, 10 August 2024 (UTC) 945:04:08, 10 August 2024 (UTC) 842:06:33, 10 August 2024 (UTC) 828:04:18, 10 August 2024 (UTC) 808:04:18, 10 August 2024 (UTC) 395:Philippine-related articles 3525: 2818:you can use this reference 1692:There should be a date. ♫ 481:here for what they are not 246:project's importance scale 3449:GA-Class Weather articles 408: 341: 301: 261: 239: 131: 100: 3504:Requests for peer review 1186:looked through ReliefWeb 273:Tropical cyclones portal 165:, which collaborates on 2951:Did you know nomination 2840:I think it's done now? 2696:Is everything okay now 744:non-free use rationales 490:reasonably well written 3216:Tropical Storm Kai-tak 3096:Tropical Storm Kai-tak 3072:QPQ needs to be done. 1959:Thanks, my mistake. ♫ 1651:Needs checking though. 1554:weak steering currents 1175:Hurricane Cindy (2005) 798:Putting this on hold. 461:Hi! I'm the nominator 298: 258: 82:This article is rated 27:Tropical Storm Kai-tak 3089:Weird, but I'll try: 731:It is illustrated by 681:neutral point of view 636:broad in its coverage 581:(inline citations to 297: 257: 86:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 39:good article criteria 3419:UndercoverClassicist 3355:UndercoverClassicist 3316:UndercoverClassicist 3277:UndercoverClassicist 3247:UndercoverClassicist 3138:UndercoverClassicist 3076:UndercoverClassicist 2747:This ref should help 1857:I found this quickly 1145:the advisory archive 386:Tambayan Philippines 333:Tambayan Philippines 57:: August 25, 2024. ( 1932:Effects in Malaysia 1608:You can use IBTRACs 1428:Ref 23 seems okay. 456: 162:WikiProject Weather 714:No edit wars, etc. 550:factually accurate 364:Philippines portal 299: 259: 180:Articles Requested 88:content assessment 3221:New People's Army 2899: 2865: 2833: 2779: 2671: 2641: 2625: 2580: 2540: 2498: 2476: 2436: 2417: 2369: 2346: 2319: 2290: 2267: 2222: 2188: 2166: 2016: 1968: 1842: 1777:this map from JMA 1748: 1701: 1620: 1483: 1451: 1415: 1380: 1216: 1075: 910: 909: 762:suitable captions 569:reference section 560:source spot-check 454: 453: 429: 428: 425: 424: 421: 420: 320: 319: 316: 315: 185:Project Resources 68: 67: 64: 3516: 3411: 3399: 3337: 3298: 3259: 3250: 3234: 3223:attacked them? 3177: 3174: 3171: 3165: 3112: 3048: 3036: 2983:a tropical storm 2928: 2919: 2915: 2914: 2895: 2884: 2876:Honestly, yeah. 2861: 2848: 2829: 2809: 2795: 2775: 2718: 2690: 2667: 2637: 2621: 2609: 2600: 2576: 2555: 2536: 2525: 2516: 2512: 2511: 2494: 2472: 2452: 2432: 2413: 2384: 2365: 2342: 2315: 2286: 2263: 2237: 2218: 2206: 2184: 2162: 2149: 2145: 2144: 2123: 2119: 2118: 2094: 2090: 2089: 2070: 2066: 2065: 2046: 2042: 2041: 2012: 1999: 1995: 1994: 1964: 1951: 1947: 1946: 1924: 1920: 1919: 1900: 1896: 1895: 1876: 1872: 1871: 1838: 1825: 1821: 1820: 1794: 1769: 1744: 1731: 1727: 1726: 1697: 1685: 1681: 1680: 1650: 1646: 1645: 1616: 1598: 1594: 1593: 1573: 1569: 1568: 1544: 1540: 1539: 1516: 1498: 1479: 1468: 1447: 1436: 1411: 1400: 1376: 1300: 1296: 1286: 1274: 1265: 1253: 1244: 1232: 1212: 1127: 1118: 1106: 1092: 1071: 1052:Yes, the latter. 864:Copyvio detector 852: 840: 832:Fixed concerns. 826: 806: 795: 794: 771: 770: 753: 752: 721: 720: 696: 695: 668: 667: 654: 653: 624: 623: 606: 605: 592: 591: 583:reliable sources 578: 577: 558:, as shown by a 538: 537: 504: 503: 438: 431: 415:importance scale 397: 396: 393: 390: 387: 366: 361: 360: 359: 350: 343: 342: 337: 329: 322: 275: 270: 269: 268: 228: 227: 226:Weather articles 224: 221: 218: 156: 151: 150: 140: 133: 132: 127: 124: 109: 102: 85: 79: 78: 77: 70: 62: 60:Reviewed version 51: 23: 16: 3524: 3523: 3519: 3518: 3517: 3515: 3514: 3513: 3429: 3428: 3406:That'll do it: 3392: 3330: 3291: 3252: 3244: 3227: 3175: 3172: 3169: 3159: 3105: 3029: 3027: 3001: 2997:Military trucks 2977: 2975: 2971:Article history 2953: 2921: 2912: 2910: 2877: 2841: 2802: 2788: 2711: 2683: 2602: 2594: 2548: 2518: 2509: 2507: 2445: 2377: 2230: 2199: 2142: 2140: 2124:Needs checking. 2116: 2114: 2087: 2085: 2063: 2061: 2039: 2037: 2000:Needs checking. 1992: 1990: 1944: 1942: 1917: 1915: 1893: 1891: 1869: 1867: 1826:Needs checking. 1818: 1816: 1787: 1781:Digital typhoon 1762: 1724: 1722: 1678: 1676: 1643: 1641: 1591: 1589: 1566: 1564: 1537: 1535: 1509: 1491: 1461: 1429: 1393: 1294: 1292: 1280: 1267: 1259: 1246: 1238: 1225: 1120: 1112: 1099: 1085: 914:This review is 906: 878: 850: 833: 819: 799: 758:appropriate use 678:It follows the 459: 457:Reviewers' note 394: 391: 388: 385: 384: 362: 357: 355: 335: 271: 266: 264: 225: 222: 219: 216: 215: 214: 190:Become a Member 152: 145: 125: 122:Western Pacific 115: 83: 58: 12: 11: 5: 3522: 3520: 3512: 3511: 3506: 3501: 3496: 3491: 3486: 3481: 3476: 3471: 3466: 3461: 3456: 3451: 3446: 3441: 3431: 3430: 3427: 3426: 3381: 3380: 3379: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3371: 3370: 3369: 3368: 3367: 3366: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3342: 3341: 3324: 3323: 3303: 3302: 3285: 3284: 3264: 3263: 3239: 3238: 3200: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3146: 3145: 3119: 3118: 3117: 3116: 3084: 3083: 3069: 3068: 3052: 3051: 3013: 3012: 3011: 3000: 2999: 2989: 2988: 2987: 2974: 2973: 2968: 2958: 2956: 2952: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2932: 2822:this reference 2799: 2751:this reference 2737: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2731: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2694: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2403: 2402: 2399: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2352: 2351: 2332: 2331: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2305: 2304: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2273: 2272: 2253: 2252: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2152: 2151: 2134: 2133: 2132:to accomplish. 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2079: 2078: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2055: 2054: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2031: 2030: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2002: 2001: 1984: 1983: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1954: 1953: 1936: 1935: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1909: 1908: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1885: 1884: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1861: 1860: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1847: 1828: 1827: 1810: 1809: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1733: 1732: 1716: 1715: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1687: 1686: 1670: 1669: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1653: 1652: 1635: 1634: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1601: 1600: 1583: 1582: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1558: 1557: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1529: 1528: 1521: 1520: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1369: 1368: 1363: 1358: 1349: 1343: 1338: 1333:Typhoon Imbudo 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1295:HurricaneEdgar 1236: 1190: 1189: 1182: 1179: 1170: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1154: 1153: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1064: 1063: 1054: 1045: 1042: 1039: 1036: 1028: 1024:Typhoon Tembin 1019: 1014: 1009: 1004: 999: 994: 989: 984: 979: 971: 925: 924: 908: 907: 905: 904: 899: 894: 888: 885: 884: 880: 879: 877: 876: 874:External links 871: 866: 860: 857: 856: 849: 846: 845: 844: 830: 815: 814: 813: 812: 811: 810: 779: 778: 777: 776: 775: 729: 728: 727: 726: 725: 704: 703: 702: 701: 700: 676: 675: 674: 673: 672: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 546: 545: 544: 543: 542: 485: 484: 458: 455: 452: 451: 439: 427: 426: 423: 422: 419: 418: 411:Mid-importance 407: 401: 400: 398: 381:the discussion 368: 367: 351: 339: 338: 336:Mid‑importance 330: 318: 317: 314: 313: 310:Mid-importance 300: 290: 289: 286:Mid-importance 277: 276: 260: 250: 249: 242:Mid-importance 238: 232: 231: 229: 213: 212: 207: 202: 197: 192: 187: 182: 176: 158: 157: 154:Weather portal 141: 129: 128: 126:Mid‑importance 110: 98: 97: 91: 80: 66: 65: 50: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3521: 3510: 3507: 3505: 3502: 3500: 3497: 3495: 3492: 3490: 3487: 3485: 3482: 3480: 3477: 3475: 3472: 3470: 3467: 3465: 3462: 3460: 3457: 3455: 3452: 3450: 3447: 3445: 3442: 3440: 3437: 3436: 3434: 3425: 3422: 3421: 3420: 3414: 3413:approved ALT2 3410: 3405: 3404: 3403: 3402: 3398: 3395: 3390: 3389:Straits Times 3386: 3361: 3358: 3357: 3356: 3350: 3346: 3345: 3344: 3343: 3340: 3336: 3333: 3328: 3327: 3326: 3325: 3322: 3319: 3318: 3317: 3311: 3307: 3306: 3305: 3304: 3301: 3297: 3294: 3289: 3288: 3287: 3286: 3283: 3280: 3279: 3278: 3272: 3268: 3267: 3266: 3265: 3262: 3258: 3255: 3248: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3237: 3233: 3230: 3226: 3222: 3218: 3217: 3212: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3204: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3192: 3188: 3187:contributions 3184: 3180: 3179: 3163: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3154: 3153: 3152: 3151: 3144: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3133: 3129: 3125: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3120: 3115: 3111: 3108: 3103: 3101: 3098: 3097: 3092: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3082: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3071: 3070: 3066: 3062: 3058: 3054: 3053: 3047: 3043: 3042: 3041: 3039: 3035: 3032: 3025: 3021: 3017: 3010: 3006: 3003: 3002: 2998: 2995: 2991: 2990: 2985: 2984: 2979: 2978: 2972: 2969: 2967: 2963: 2960: 2959: 2955: 2950: 2933: 2931: 2927: 2924: 2918: 2909: 2908:Hurricanehink 2905: 2904: 2903: 2898: 2893: 2892:Hurricanehink 2889: 2888: 2887: 2883: 2880: 2875: 2874:Hurricanehink 2871: 2870: 2869: 2864: 2859: 2858:Hurricanehink 2854: 2853: 2851: 2847: 2844: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2832: 2827: 2826:Hurricanehink 2823: 2819: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2808: 2805: 2800: 2798: 2794: 2791: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2778: 2773: 2772:Hurricanehink 2769: 2766: 2763: 2759: 2754: 2752: 2748: 2743: 2721: 2717: 2714: 2709: 2706: 2703: 2699: 2698:Hurricanehink 2695: 2693: 2689: 2686: 2681: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2670: 2665: 2664:Hurricanehink 2661: 2658: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2640: 2635: 2634:Hurricanehink 2631: 2630: 2629: 2624: 2619: 2618:Hurricanehink 2614: 2613: 2612: 2608: 2605: 2598: 2597:Hurricanehink 2593: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2579: 2574: 2573:Hurricanehink 2558: 2554: 2551: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2539: 2534: 2533:Hurricanehink 2530: 2529: 2528: 2524: 2521: 2515: 2506: 2502: 2497: 2492: 2491:Hurricanehink 2487: 2486: 2484: 2480: 2475: 2470: 2469:Hurricanehink 2466: 2463: 2462: 2460: 2459: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2451: 2448: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2435: 2430: 2429:Hurricanehink 2421: 2416: 2411: 2410:Hurricanehink 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2400: 2397: 2396: 2387: 2383: 2380: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2368: 2363: 2362:Hurricanehink 2359: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2350: 2345: 2340: 2339:Hurricanehink 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2329: 2328: 2323: 2318: 2313: 2312:Hurricanehink 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2302: 2301: 2294: 2289: 2284: 2283:Hurricanehink 2280: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2271: 2266: 2261: 2260:Hurricanehink 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2250: 2249: 2240: 2236: 2233: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2221: 2216: 2215:Hurricanehink 2211: 2210: 2209: 2205: 2202: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2187: 2182: 2181:Hurricanehink 2170: 2165: 2160: 2159:Hurricanehink 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2148: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2130: 2129: 2122: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2093: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2076: 2075: 2069: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2053:What is MSWD? 2052: 2051: 2045: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2028: 2027: 2020: 2015: 2010: 2009:Hurricanehink 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 1998: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1980: 1979: 1972: 1967: 1962: 1961:Hurricanehink 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1950: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1933: 1930: 1929: 1923: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1906: 1905: 1899: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1882: 1881: 1875: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1853: 1846: 1841: 1836: 1835:Hurricanehink 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1824: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1807: 1806: 1797: 1793: 1790: 1785: 1784: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1768: 1765: 1760: 1759:Hurricanehink 1756: 1752: 1747: 1742: 1741:Hurricanehink 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1730: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1713: 1712: 1705: 1700: 1695: 1694:Hurricanehink 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1684: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1667: 1666: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1649: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1632: 1631: 1624: 1619: 1614: 1613:Hurricanehink 1609: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1597: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1579: 1578: 1572: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1550: 1543: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1519: 1515: 1512: 1507: 1501: 1497: 1494: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1482: 1477: 1476:Hurricanehink 1473: 1472: 1471: 1467: 1464: 1459: 1455: 1450: 1445: 1444:Hurricanehink 1441: 1440: 1439: 1435: 1432: 1427: 1426:Hurricanehink 1423: 1419: 1414: 1409: 1408:Hurricanehink 1405: 1404: 1403: 1399: 1396: 1391: 1390:Hurricanehink 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1379: 1374: 1373:Hurricanehink 1367: 1364: 1362: 1359: 1357: 1356: 1350: 1348: 1344: 1342: 1339: 1337: 1334: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1324: 1321: 1318: 1314: 1303: 1299: 1297: 1290: 1284: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1273: 1270: 1263: 1262:Hurricanehink 1258: 1257: 1256: 1252: 1249: 1242: 1241:Hurricanehink 1237: 1235: 1231: 1228: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1215: 1210: 1209:Hurricanehink 1206: 1203: 1200: 1196: 1187: 1183: 1180: 1178: 1176: 1171: 1169: 1166: 1165: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1146: 1142: 1130: 1126: 1123: 1116: 1115:Hurricanehink 1111: 1110: 1109: 1105: 1102: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1091: 1088: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1074: 1069: 1068:Hurricanehink 1062: 1060: 1055: 1053: 1051: 1046: 1043: 1040: 1037: 1034: 1029: 1027: 1025: 1020: 1018: 1015: 1013: 1010: 1008: 1005: 1003: 1000: 998: 995: 993: 990: 988: 985: 983: 980: 978: 975: 974: 973: 969: 968: 964: 961: 958: 954: 953:Hurricanehink 951: 947: 946: 942: 939: 936: 932: 929: 923: 921: 917: 912: 911: 903: 900: 898: 895: 893: 890: 889: 887: 886: 881: 875: 872: 870: 867: 865: 862: 861: 859: 858: 853: 847: 843: 839: 836: 831: 829: 825: 822: 817: 816: 809: 805: 802: 797: 796: 789: 786: 785: 783: 780: 773: 772: 765: 763: 759: 747: 745: 739: 738: 736: 735: 730: 723: 722: 715: 712: 711: 709: 705: 698: 697: 690: 687: 686: 684: 682: 677: 670: 669: 662: 660: 648: 646: 645:major aspects 640: 639: 637: 633: 626: 625: 618: 616: 612: 600: 598: 586: 584: 572: 570: 564: 563: 561: 557: 556: 551: 547: 540: 539: 532: 530: 526: 522: 518: 514: 510: 498: 494: 493: 491: 487: 486: 482: 478: 474: 472: 468: 467: 466: 464: 449: 448:peer reviewed 445: 444: 440: 437: 433: 432: 416: 412: 406: 403: 402: 399: 382: 378: 374: 373: 365: 354: 352: 349: 345: 344: 340: 334: 331: 328: 324: 311: 308:(assessed as 307: 306: 296: 292: 291: 287: 284:(assessed as 283: 282: 274: 263: 256: 252: 251: 247: 243: 237: 234: 233: 230: 211: 208: 206: 203: 201: 198: 196: 193: 191: 188: 186: 183: 181: 178: 177: 175:for details. 174: 170: 169: 164: 163: 155: 149: 144: 142: 139: 135: 134: 130: 123: 119: 114: 111: 108: 104: 99: 95: 89: 81: 72: 71: 61: 56: 55: 48: 44: 40: 36: 35: 34: 28: 25: 22: 18: 17: 3418: 3416: 3412: 3382: 3354: 3352: 3315: 3313: 3276: 3274: 3270: 3214: 3210: 3168: 3162:TheNuggeteer 3137: 3135: 3094: 3090: 3075: 3073: 3028: 3023: 3016:TheNuggeteer 3004: 2981: 2954: 2916: 2764: 2758:TheNuggeteer 2755: 2741: 2738: 2704: 2656: 2650:TheNuggeteer 2569: 2513: 2464: 2426: 2357: 2278: 2177: 2146: 2120: 2091: 2067: 2043: 1996: 1948: 1921: 1897: 1873: 1822: 1728: 1682: 1647: 1595: 1570: 1541: 1523:More notes. 1522: 1370: 1365: 1360: 1354: 1352: 1345: 1340: 1329: 1319: 1313:TheNuggeteer 1310: 1287:Here is the 1283:TheNuggeteer 1201: 1195:TheNuggeteer 1191: 1172: 1167: 1138: 1137: 1065: 1058: 1056: 1049: 1047: 1032: 1021: 1016: 1011: 1006: 1001: 996: 991: 986: 981: 976: 970: 959: 949: 948: 937: 931:TheNuggeteer 927: 926: 913: 902:Instructions 787: 781: 755: 741: 732: 713: 707: 688: 679: 656: 642: 635: 608: 594: 580: 566: 553: 549: 506: 496: 489: 469: 463:TheNuggeteer 462: 460: 441: 410: 370: 303: 279: 241: 195:Project Talk 173:project page 166: 160: 94:WikiProjects 52: 43:please do so 31: 30: 26: 916:transcluded 521:word choice 377:Philippines 3433:Categories 3385:an article 2994:Bulldozers 928:Nominator: 869:Authorship 855:GA toolbox 615:plagiarism 555:verifiable 200:Assessment 37:under the 3394:🍗TheNugg 3332:🍗TheNugg 3293:🍗TheNugg 3254:🍗TheNugg 3251:Pinging. 3229:🍗TheNugg 3128:WP:DYKINT 3107:🍗TheNugg 3093:... that 3031:🍗TheNugg 2923:🍗TheNugg 2920:I think? 2879:🍗TheNugg 2843:🍗TheNugg 2804:🍗TheNugg 2790:🍗TheNugg 2713:🍗TheNugg 2685:🍗TheNugg 2604:🍗TheNugg 2550:🍗TheNugg 2520:🍗TheNugg 2447:🍗TheNugg 2379:🍗TheNugg 2232:🍗TheNugg 2201:🍗TheNugg 1789:🍗TheNugg 1764:🍗TheNugg 1581:guessing? 1511:🍗TheNugg 1493:🍗TheNugg 1463:🍗TheNugg 1431:🍗TheNugg 1395:🍗TheNugg 1269:🍗TheNugg 1266:Pinging. 1248:🍗TheNugg 1227:🍗TheNugg 1122:🍗TheNugg 1119:Pinging. 1101:🍗TheNugg 1087:🍗TheNugg 950:Reviewer: 892:Templates 883:Reviewing 848:GA Review 835:🍗TheNugg 821:🍗TheNugg 801:🍗TheNugg 788:Pass/Fail 443:A request 3005:Reviewed 2992:Source: 2768:contribs 2708:contribs 2660:contribs 2465:Not done 2358:Not done 2279:Not done 1323:contribs 1205:contribs 963:contribs 941:contribs 897:Criteria 118:Tropical 84:GA-class 47:reassess 3397:eteer🍗 3387:by the 3335:eteer🍗 3296:eteer🍗 3257:eteer🍗 3232:eteer🍗 3110:eteer🍗 3034:eteer🍗 2962:Comment 2926:eteer🍗 2882:eteer🍗 2846:eteer🍗 2807:eteer🍗 2793:eteer🍗 2716:eteer🍗 2688:eteer🍗 2607:eteer🍗 2553:eteer🍗 2523:eteer🍗 2517:I hope 2450:eteer🍗 2382:eteer🍗 2235:eteer🍗 2204:eteer🍗 2139:Reply: 2113:Reply: 2084:Reply: 2060:Reply: 2036:Reply: 1989:Reply: 1941:Reply: 1914:Reply: 1890:Reply: 1866:Reply: 1815:Reply: 1792:eteer🍗 1767:eteer🍗 1721:Reply: 1675:Reply: 1640:Reply: 1588:Reply: 1563:Reply: 1534:Reply: 1514:eteer🍗 1496:eteer🍗 1466:eteer🍗 1434:eteer🍗 1398:eteer🍗 1272:eteer🍗 1251:eteer🍗 1230:eteer🍗 1141:IBTRACS 1125:eteer🍗 1104:eteer🍗 1090:eteer🍗 838:eteer🍗 824:eteer🍗 804:eteer🍗 782:Overall 659:focused 611:copyvio 525:fiction 413:on the 244:on the 217:Weather 205:A-Class 168:weather 113:Weather 3383:Found 3219:, the 3176:hinata 3170:Naruto 1786:Done. 734:images 708:stable 706:It is 683:policy 634:It is 548:It is 527:, and 517:layout 488:It is 479:, and 473:review 210:Alerts 90:scale. 54:Review 3349:WP:RS 3310:WP:RS 3271:doing 3211:ALT2: 3091:ALT1: 3050:ALTs? 2770:). ♫ 2742:still 1779:, or 1207:). ♫ 918:from 760:with 529:lists 475:(see 3225:SRC2 3183:talk 3173:love 3063:and 3020:talk 2966:view 2917:Done 2897:talk 2863:talk 2831:talk 2777:talk 2762:talk 2702:talk 2669:talk 2654:talk 2639:talk 2623:talk 2578:talk 2538:talk 2514:Done 2496:talk 2474:talk 2434:talk 2415:talk 2367:talk 2344:talk 2317:talk 2288:talk 2265:talk 2220:talk 2186:talk 2164:talk 2147:Done 2121:Done 2092:Done 2068:Done 2044:Done 2014:talk 1997:Done 1966:talk 1949:Done 1922:Done 1898:Done 1874:Done 1840:talk 1823:Done 1746:talk 1729:Done 1699:talk 1683:Done 1648:Done 1618:talk 1596:Done 1571:Done 1542:Done 1481:talk 1449:talk 1413:talk 1378:talk 1325:). 1317:talk 1289:link 1214:talk 1199:talk 1073:talk 1059:Nom: 1050:Nom: 1033:Nom: 957:talk 935:talk 613:and 552:and 513:lead 511:for 2964:or 2900:) 2866:) 2834:) 2780:) 2710:)? 2680:.tv 2672:) 2648:Hi 2642:) 2626:) 2581:) 2541:) 2499:) 2477:) 2437:) 2418:) 2370:) 2347:) 2320:) 2291:) 2268:) 2223:) 2189:) 2167:) 2017:) 1969:) 1843:) 1749:) 1702:) 1621:) 1484:) 1452:) 1416:) 1381:) 1217:) 1076:) 509:MoS 405:Mid 236:Mid 49:it. 3435:: 3415:. 3391:. 3189:) 3185:· 3130:: 3104:. 3040:. 3007:: 2957:( 2852:\ 965:) 943:) 790:: 784:: 766:: 754:b 748:: 740:a 716:: 710:. 691:: 685:. 663:: 655:b 649:: 641:a 638:. 619:: 607:d 601:: 597:OR 593:c 587:: 579:b 573:: 565:a 562:. 533:: 523:, 519:, 515:, 505:b 499:: 495:a 492:. 471:GA 312:). 288:). 120:/ 116:: 63:). 3249:: 3245:@ 3181:( 3178:5 3164:: 3160:@ 3024:1 3018:( 2986:? 2976:) 2906:@ 2894:( 2872:@ 2860:( 2828:( 2774:( 2765:· 2760:( 2705:· 2700:( 2666:( 2657:· 2652:( 2636:( 2620:( 2599:: 2595:@ 2575:( 2535:( 2493:( 2471:( 2431:( 2412:( 2364:( 2341:( 2314:( 2285:( 2262:( 2217:( 2183:( 2161:( 2011:( 1963:( 1837:( 1757:@ 1743:( 1696:( 1615:( 1478:( 1446:( 1424:@ 1410:( 1388:@ 1375:( 1351:' 1320:· 1315:( 1285:: 1281:@ 1264:: 1260:@ 1243:: 1239:@ 1211:( 1202:· 1197:( 1117:: 1113:@ 1070:( 960:· 955:( 938:· 933:( 764:) 756:( 746:) 661:) 657:( 647:) 643:( 617:) 609:( 599:) 595:( 585:) 571:) 567:( 531:) 507:( 483:) 417:. 248:. 96::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index