Talk:Unique Identification Authority of India/Archive 1

3007:

cannot remain absent. Jharkhand govt Aadhaar biometric attendance is the best example. 2. Cheats cannot hold more than one tax PAN to evade taxes and commit other frauds. 3. Middlemen & officials cannot continue with corruption in social welfare pensions, scholarships, public health, NREGA, subsidy on PDS ration, kerosene, LPG etc. 4. Ineligible, duplicate and ghost beneficiaries cannot steal from public welfare programs. 5. Corrupts cannot buy & sell benami land & building. 6. Corrupts cannot operate benami companies for money-laundering. 7. Corrupts cannot operate benami bank accounts for black-money & money-laundering. 8. Criminals, illegal immigrants & terrorists cannot hide anymore, will get detected and tracked easily. 9. Criminals cannot hide as records are getting accessible to police from anywhere. 10. Blood-sucking moneylenders (interest rate 20% to 30% pm) will lose to Aadhaar-enabled bank-lending. 11. Poor farmers will not commit suicide after falling in debt-trap of moneylenders and Ponzi schemes. 12. One cannot get another driving license and arms license once it gets impounded. 13. Black-marketers cannot hoard and resell public resources at premium. 14. Proxy people cannot write exams and cast bogus vote. 15. Ineligible people cannot misuse certificates of low income, domicile, education degrees and caste. 16. People cannot get multiple voter cards and ration cards from multiple places.

3734:

topic relevant to every one in six of the world’s human population, the Indian citizens. It could primarily be inferred that the page was blocked, due to few so called editors who are either against or in favor of the scheme called Aadhaar. It is pretty clear that most of the editors involved in this are not for the principles and mottos of Knowledge, and the administrators haven’t responded to the previous query which could be answered, just by following the ‘vandalism war’ happened with that page itself. As I believe, Knowledge is as democratic as the part of the world, where Aadhaar is being implemented, everything will have multiple perceptions, opinions and outlook and thereby Knowledge could have a proper mechanism to deal with that. For a common man, or editors of Knowledge, it is easy to create a page in any name related to that scheme and furnish the details and link it to the presently diverted page UIDAI. But that is not the right way of implementing the democracy, which Knowledge stands for. Of course there will be oppositions in democracies and they can delete that page too. But, due to the activities of one editor, who seems so childish, called RavishyamBangalore and those who oppose him, Knowledge should not have locked a page which is as simple as a scheme of government. Please give a thought and respond.

1730:

the 24 hour deadline for him to reply since I thought he might have been unaware of the problems faced by the arguments given by Notabede and might have come here thinking Notabede was right. But the irony is that I myself was not able to come here for 2 days. At last I found you whose arguments seem to be legit. I would be highly grateful to you if you help me in removing the copyright violations if any. One of the primary reasons why I wanted to restore the article as I explained to Notabede was that there was a lot of data in the article and corrections and other improvements can be made once it's restored. Since there are many links that you have listed above, would you be kind enough to tell what exactly do you want me to go through them before I really go through them? Once the article is restored, we can immediately start the development work. -

330:... each specific recognition technology (iris, face, voice, fingerprint, hand, etc.) will have specific factors that must be within a state of statistical control. This list of factors is not well understood, although ample work in this area is continuing. For example, recent analysis of iris and face recognition test results shows us that to report false match and false non-match performance metrics for such systems without reporting on the percentage of data subjects wearing contact lenses, the period of time between collection of the compared image sets, the commercial systems used in the collection process, pupil dilation, and lighting direction is to report “nothing at all”. Our reported measurements cannot be expected to be repeatable or reproducible without knowledge and control of these factors. 1819:- I restored the content twice with proper explanation I believe. It was Notabede who wasn't answering my questions properly and pushing his own views instead (like Aadhaar is a mere no., it doesn't deserve an article etc.). If he had did it properly earlier then I would have stopped it after the 1st attempt itself or we would have now been working constructively. You are saying that I am edit warring here. Wasn't it Notabede who was edit warring here actually? First with RB and then me. The article was protected upon his request to protect his version. I did report him to ANI and my request to ban him were termed frivolous. But what I wanted initially was admin attention of what he was doing and I got what I wanted. These comments by Unfitlouie were termed frivolous by me - 3751: 3089:

plow ahead with your malformed writing. Please slow down, and say here if there is anything in particular that I or others have done that you disagree with. Your vague statement that "Some of your changes made the intended meaning of my sentences opposite" is not helpful. It was not my intention to reverse any meaning, so if I have done so you need to point that out. In the mean time, stop with the undoing of all help, and let's try to understand what you think is wrong.

3667:

revised enrollment target, and additional fund allocation, since its establishment. On the other hand Aadhaar has many success and failures, and makes news in Indian media almost every day since new government took charge. So, Aadhaar deserves an additional page, and has enough content too. Blocking that(or redirecting) till September 2015 seems to be unfair and denying information to public who turn to Knowledge to get a view on many things is highly unethical too.

1992:. The entire content of this unencyclopedic article is disputed (as POV pushing) as it consists of unsourced / wrongly sourced / mischievously worded text which contradicts the sources cited and is POV pushing to suit the author's agenda and reads like a bulletin for the Aadhar agency from where most of this article is sourced. If this article has to be restored, it must be done from scratch, with consensus and to strictly comply with Knowledge policies. 320:... technology testing on artificial or simulated databases tells us only about the performance of a software package on that data. There is nothing in a technology test that can validate the simulated data as a proxy for the “real world”, beyond a comparison to the real world data actually available. In other words, technology testing on simulated data cannot logically serve as a proxy for software performance over large, unseen, operational datasets. 2141: 31: 1473:

originally blocked for making legal threats. The article was being developed by multiple editors before the contents were removed by Notabede saying that it was a stable redirect for 2 years and it should remain the same. There is no reason why an article shouldn't be expanded in future. How do you explain that? The entire content removal by Notabede were due to frivolous reasons and hence should be restored immediately. -

248:

that. But in advance of that research bearing fruit, what the paper says is that no trial results can provide a valid reason to invest in biometrics. In that case the investment in biometrics is unbusinesslike, irresponsible, unscientific and illogical. Instead of being a reasoned investment, it has more the character of an impulse purchase. Governments are not paid to make impulse purchases using taxpayers’ money.

258:"For purpose of NIST PATRIOT Act certification this test certifies the accuracy of the participating systems on the datasets used in the test. This evaluation does not certify that any of the systems tested meet the requirements of any specific government application. This would require that factors not included in this test such as image quality, dataset size, cost, and required response time be included." 1184: 3785: 3702: 3574: 2280: 1149:. We are voting here on the decision whether the contents should be inserted back for modification. It was Todsst1's suggestion that the discussion be continued here. I thought vote would be better since we are simply fighting. We both are right according to ourselves so I thought let third parties decide. If you want the matter to be pursued at WP:DR. It's purely your wish. - 1792:. Notabede's analysis/reverts there was quite accurate, and the nominator (whom Notabede was blocked for edit warring on that article with) did not even turn up to defend that equally non-neutral, promotional and poorly sourced article. I propose to the blocking Admin (if he's watching this talk page) that Notabeede be unblocked to carry on this dialog with Jayadevp13. 3488:

to absence of address on the PAN card, driving license and passport cannot be verified at the point of general service etc. The perusal and analysis of the identities from the viewpoint of people, process, tools and technology while authentication show its strength and weaknesses as general purposes identity, hence its acceptability as general purposes identity.

2976: 139: 716:

not lending ear to my views? Do you even know the meaning of original research or what? You say the article is full of original research but a total of 161 references have been cited as sources. You say that Aadhar is just a 12-digit no. and hence doesn't need a separate article. Then why don't you just go and nominate all the articles of

1979:

restore / work on this highly controversial article, the ignoring of the repeated warnings by administrators to Ravishyam_Banglore on his talk page while he was blocked to pay careful attention to NPOV, especially when he was unblocked, the evidence of off-wiki communications between Ravishyam_Bangalore and Jayadeva13 for this article

1753:. My short answer is that the content should not be restored at one go, ie. if it has to be restored at all. My long answer is that in addition to dubious sourcing, the reverted article is also heavily derived from primary sources such as the Aadhar's websites. So even after we remove the dubious sources, and 3924:

version of the article, but likely over 90% of that is utterly not suitable for an encyclopedia article and should go (e.g. sections 2, 4, 5, 7 to 20 can practically be completely removed (some info be merged into the remainder, but some sections are wholesale inappropriate), mostly per the different

3666:

Indeed, page on Aadhaar has not been deleted but is being redirected to Unique Identification Authority of India. Kindly note that these two are functionally different entities. One is the authority issuing UID and another one is the implication of that UID. UIDAI has not had much change other than

2225:

This ENTIRE article is badly sourced, is sourced from Aadhar Agency website, or Aadhar agency publicity materials and is clearly POV pushing on your part. You were unblocked after being warned about the NPOV policy. This article may be restored if it is notable and deserves an article of its own, but

2139:

You have twice reverted my edits without discussion taking place, and are therefore edit warring. Simply adding a tag to the article does not permit disputed text to stay on the page. You have restored unsourced text or copyright violations pointed out by other editors on this talk page. The numerals

726:

for deletion just for being mere numbers? How do you think that I cannot edit the article in a neutral way? Again and again you are saying that RB was blocked for POV pushing. But I am saying that I don't care about it. The data used in his article is good and I want to use it as a base for improving

254:

The paper by Messrs Wayman, Possolo and Mansfield states that it is impossible to measure the performance of biometric systems. It follows that it is impossible to say if their accuracy is improving. The authors give as an example of the problem the certificates issued by NIST connection with the USA

243:

NIST say: “The paper does not say that biometrics are not useful in real world settings”. True, if we all accept that we know what is meant here by “useful”. That is one of many things that the paper does not say. What it does say is that technology tests and scenario tests tell you nothing about how

74:

The discussion regarding the paper "Fundamental issues in biometric performance testing" is a misreading of the cited paper, and states conclusions that do not appear in that paper. One of the authors (Wayman) is a consultant to UIDAI. The statement as written is baseless, and appears to be written

3487:

The identities given in the following table were devised for its specific use as explained below. In the absence of any general purpose identity like Aadhaar, people started using these identities for general purpose despite various deficiencies, e.g. PAN card is not accepted as proof of address due

1978:

With recent IP edits to this article geolocating to Uttar Pradesh (where blocked user Jayadevp13 edits from), the continued lack of relevant discussion between editors to achieve consensus, the ignoring of lengthy prior discussion and administrator instructions that agreement of editors is needed to

1629:

for any change to be made. This article is replete with copyright contraventions which primitive tools like earwig's Copy vio detector cannot spot. It needs considerable expertise to use such tools. I am perfectly willing to assist for copy vio detection on this article when an environment for civil

1531:, ie. Aadhaar, over Original Research, non-neutral content and Self Published primary text from the UID website. All the controversial text of the blocked 3rd editor is removed from the article which now appears to be concise, reasonably well sourced and thankfully free from his bizarre edit warring. 952:

I don't know how it's a personal attack but I agree that you have full right to remove it if you think so. The content was originally hosted in Knowledge and I believe it's fully valid to copy it to somewhere else. I just copied it to my talk page since it's automatically archived and if it's needed

314:

Is there any hope of inductively extending the results of our technical test more broadly to any other algorithms or databases? A Type B systematic uncertainty evaluation after consideration of changes in the unit of empirical significance and statistical controls over its tangible elements might be

3396:

As stated, Aadhaar has thousands of applications - existing and future in the form of hardware, software and processes. Aadhaar being a general ID, is is compared and linked with other ID articles like PAN, voter id, ration card etc. so that the spirit of wikipedia is maintained. We do see a banner

1472:

please explain me how is it POV pushing? I am telling you the truth I really fail to understand how it's POV pushing when both sides of the topic have been covered (positive impact as well as the problems faced). I would be highly grateful if you please explain it to me properly. The 3rd editor was

715:

You yourself tell on your talk page that the content will not be added back without discussing to reach a consensus and you are not ready to read the points that I have written so painstakingly? You again and again say that RB used to due POV pushing but let me ask you, aren't you doing the same by

239:

NIST say: “The paper discusses how to understand measurement uncertainties so that law enforcement agencies and other users of biometrics can accurately determine the limitations of their systems”. False, for the same reason. The paper identifies 15 or so influencing factors which contribute to the

103:

The paper does not say that biometrics are not useful in real world settings. It advocates moving beyond yes-and-no answers in the biometrics area to do a better job of carefully understanding and documenting the variables that affect the accuracy of these technologies as they are used in practice.

1729:

chose not to let me connect to internet yesterday. You don't know but I am trying to be as civil as I can. I am not joking! This thing has really given me a headache. First Notabede came and then Unfitlouie to stall the development of the article with frivolous reasons as I explained above. I kept

624:

I do not agree that work of the above user should be used as starting point for this article. I also need to be convinced that this article is substantially different/notable from UIDAI to which all "Aadhaar" pages are presently redirected as per independent consensus of many past editors spanning

244:

well biometrics will perform in the field and that operational tests measure nothing. It is quite possible to agree with this statement of NIST’s and yet still believe that Aadhaar, on its own terms, is bound to fail, it cannot identify people uniquely and it cannot verify their identity reliably.

231:

NIST say: “This research paper described above with a NIST coauthor is about how to apply uncertainty measurements to the testing of biometric technologies”. True. And what the paper says is that the uncertainty cannot be measured, there is no point guessing, the biometrics emperor has no clothes.

199:

There are many issue with Aadhaar card , which reported by Leading News paper, Faced personnely , why not allow to update the same. This is public page, so when mentioned this xyz dream project etc , mention detail how is this xyz. Not eveyone in this world know who this xyz or abc. Please don't

3088:

Undoing here did have some collateral damage this time, since I undid your latest additions and changes as well. They are too complicated for me to try to understand and reproduce, but you can't just bulk undo the work of all your collaborators who are trying to help with grammar and styling and

693:

The version of Aadhar text you insist on using is littered with POV pushing, Original Research, Promotional text directly copy-vio'ed from UIDAI's website and also some blatant lies. That user is blocked for POV pushing and edit warring in UIDAI and Aadhar related articles. In any case, Aadhar is

3733:

The post in talk page on Aadhaar has no response as of now. What should an ordinary individual who had voluntarily contributed to Knowledge have to assume in this scenario? Knowledge, which stands for democratization of knowledge, had blocked a page, Aadhaar, which is one of the widely discussed

665:

of the article. It is in no way a copy of UIDAI since it is much more longer and has more info too. The difference between UIDAI and Aadhar is too obvious. Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) is a government agency in New Delhi that serves as the issuing authority for Aadhaar unique

247:

NIST say: “It advocates moving beyond yes-and-no answers in the biometrics area to do a better job of carefully understanding and documenting the variables that affect the accuracy of these technologies as they are used in practice”. True. More research is needed and I, for one, heartily support

3006:

Who is afraid of Aadhaar & why? As of Sep-2014, over 67 crore people (56% of population) have been assigned Aadhaar and 85 crore (70%) enrolled. As the public databases are getting interlinked one by one thru Aadhaar number in various states, we see the following effects: 1. Govt employees

3332:

for improving me. I must pay attention other rules beyond content creation. I have been a reader of Knowledge for the past 15 years. However, I began my contribution since Aug 2013 with contents. I may need more guidance from you veterans in future for creative and collaborative good articles.

493:

were deleted in October-2013 on the ground that my contents belonged to 'Aadhaar' program, whereas 'UIDAI' page should contain Organization related content only. I agreed to this logic, hence developed the 'Aadhaar' page from scratch. The traces of development is present on the wiki-server for

99:

This article does not follow Knowledge editorial policy. It describes a research paper in a non-neutral, inaccurate way. The March 2010 research paper linked within the Knowledge article is about how to apply uncertainty measurements to the testing of biometric technologies. Such testing has

1768:. Notice on the talk page of the blocked editor Notabede constitutes no notice at all. Your past action to report Notabede was also found "frivolous". I also can't quite see here how Unfitlouie's comments are frivolous or were to "stall" this article. Is there anything about the phrase 819:"Here's a suggestion: Get a discussion on the talk page. If numerous editors are in agreement that a change should be made, one outlier will not corrupt consensus. Once that is achieved, the article should be edited - even if it is protected. Toddst1 (talk) 12:05, 3 December 2013 (UTC)" 1836:- I am not interested in it's good article status. Why should Notabede be unblocked? Just because his reasons for removing the content were right (not sure about that too)? He was involved in an edit war there too and his unblock request was also rejected. He could have gone to 235:

NIST say: “Such testing has substantially improved the accuracy of biometric technologies over the years”. False. This is the opposite of what the paper says, which is that it is impossible to measure the accuracy of biometric technologies, they are out of statistical control.

1557:. RB came here after that and started developing the article properly and reliably. See, you didn't answer my questions. Simply because an editor was at edit war somewhere else, it is no reason why all his contributons should be removed. You yourself had been edit warring at 1654: 1144:

I initially thought that RB had full rights to defend what he did. But only later did I remember that he can edit only his own talk page & not any one else. If according to you I am disruptive then I too can call you disruptive according to some definitions of it at

656:

by the bot ClueBot NG. The first one was because the article was too short at that time & might have seemed copy of UIDAI. The 2nd was reverted by the bot as vandalism, which is of course wrong. I don't know if someone had reported about it at that time. It was then

291:

I see that someone logged on from 65.216.138.253 yesterday at 14:13 and edited this page but didn't answer the question – is there any evidence to support the claim that Mr Wayman is a consultant to UIDAI? It might help if we could have an answer from this IP address.

183:

quotes extensively from the paper by Messrs Wayman, Possolo and Mansfield attempting thereby at each stage to support its argument. Would the contributor at 65.216.138.253 please list the statements he/she finds "baseless" and I shall be happy then to respond further.

107:

Moreover, the comment in the Knowledge article referencing Antonio Possolo of the National Institute of Standards and Technology violates the Knowledge policy on Biographies of living persons. It attributes statements to Dr. Possolo and/or NIST that are not sourced.

129:

I have not done the request at this time, because, you didn't tell us *what* needs changing. I understand your arguments, but... consider that we are looking at each case; please say "X needs to change to Y", or "ZZZ needs to be removed" - please do that, and ask

100:

substantially improved the accuracy of biometric technologies over the years. The paper discusses how to understand measurement uncertainties so that law enforcement agencies and other users of biometrics can accurately determine the limitations of their systems.

2166:@Unfitlouie: Please be constructive and help to improve the article. Making the article blank by redirection is destruction. I have done some improvements, and will do further in few weeks. Call for vote / consensus / administrator but do not be destructive. 2014:

I have removed the primary citations which were mostly additional. Added a few secondary citations. A few primary citations could not be removed because they have fundamental information; not available as secondary source e.g. Aadhaar Number System document.

1844:. Why did he edit war. If he is unblocked then RB should be unblocked too so that he can continue the discussion with Notabede. I came here afterwards just like you did. What beats me is the efforts you are putting in to defend Notabede's actions. - 3816:

Please change divert to UIDAI, so that it is developed as an independent page. Please remove the locked status till 2015 September to a reasonably shorter period. Please allow eminent editors of Knowledge to edit that page and avoid controversies.

2143:

which shows a high correlation of edits between you and another contributor with the same numerals who made the identical changes as you. So assuming your good faith, please edit cautiously and factor Knowledge's policies including on meatpuppetry.

310:, please advise what I should do. I understand Gail Porter's conflict of interest problem. But I can't just guess what amendments are sought. Here are some of the facts stated as facts in my paper, quoted from the Wayman/Possolo/Mansfield paper: 1111:(to 'Jayadevp13' for disruptive editing and personal attacks). What exactly are we "voting" on here ? The "highly POV" content inserted in am essentially uninterrupted series of rapid-fire edits by a user who was indefinitely blocked for it ? 1468:. How can you call it original research when 161 references were provided? What duplicate entry is he talking about? I asked these questions on his talk page but he didn't give a reply. The spelling is the same as in the references. Could 3073:

Actually, those sentences don't belong to you. If my interpretation of your grammar was wrong, you should correct it. I will restore the extensive work that I did in trying to turn your writing into good English and Knowledge style.

1327:

page, and for the additional reason that there is no rationale for this article in the first place considering that Aadhaar is merely a random 12 digit number issued by the subject of the redirect (whose only function is to issue that

796:

This is a content dispute on a highly POV topic. The basics of WP:DR have not been pursued (yet). The request to ban the OP's target is frivolous. No administrator action appropriate at this time. Toddst1 (talk) 12:05, 3 December 2013

3605:

Deleting the page on Aadhaar, a highly discussed topic in India, is a ridiculous act to do and is dead against the moto of Knowledge. Please don’t keep it locked and Knowledge can take help form eligible editors to modify the page.

2069:

I have reverted all your edits and restored the redirect. Please see the discussion which took place while you were blocked. If you are unable to edit Knowledge in terms of core policies you are very likely to be blocked permanently.

694:

merely a 12 digit number issued by UIDAI, and as such does not merit a separate article of its own. The entire thrust of the article developed by "R_B" was fallacious and deceptive to create a fork of the then existing UIDAI article.

3912:- topics like 'Eligibility criteria', 'registration process', 'architecture', 'implications', 'security concerns', 'government directives' are inappropriate. Also the 'Future prospects' is inappropriate, because we are also not 1915:, when faced with 2 extreme versions of this article, I would select the one which does least harm to Knowledge - ie. the REDIRECT. Good articles at Knowledge are built slowly through consensus of multiple contributing editors. 350:

We can conclude that the three types of tests are measuring incommensurate quantities and therefore should not be at all surprised when the values for the same technologies vary widely and unpredictably over the three types of

1887:. Recently a fairly longish (25,000 bytes) version of this article (Ravishyam_Bangalore seemed prone to salting duplicate copies of his articles all across Knowledge under different titles) was also similarly redirected there 3025:

Some of your edits have been reverted. The reasons were explained to you on my talk page in the last few days. You could not answer to my queries satisfactorily. You did not agree to build consensus before making changes.

1764:, frankly it beats me how you can justify your repeated reversions to reinsert such slanted content without consensus, especially when this article has been recently protected against edit warring. You have also repeatedly 3509:

Aadhaar is large and stable article with over 300 citations, thus well source. Vested interest people must refrain from blanking it by redirection. Next such attempt will be reported to Administrator for punitive action.

452:

Since it started with a blank page (only REDIRECT TO UIDAI page was existing there) and it is not even one week old page, therefore please give some time to develop it. Until then calling as an Advt will be prejudice.

3029:

Your major single change of +790 bytes is still there which needs to broken into smaller changes and some changes need not be done. Therefore I request you to do it by your self building consensus with me and others.

640:

I have left a reply on your talk page also. If you came here first then I recommend that you read it first and then continue here. I also added a note below the name of the section for new members coming to join the

3381:, read like advocacy for the Aadhaar system, rather than neutral reporting on it. Does anyone have a good idea how to get the attention of some more neutral and knowledgeable editors to come in and try to fix it? 200:

make wiki like goverment control News channels. If issue is there accept it , then only thing will improve. is this goverment page and only sweet quote word should display here , if yes, then let us know clearly?

1941:"? I didn't understand. The content on hand is this Aadhaar article then why are you telling me about MGNREA and other articles created by RB? Edit warring on talk page? Please explain. I said OK to your saying " 1757:

the information sourced from UID websites, we are then left with a very selective set of newspaper references chosen by an editor who is indefinitely blocked for contravening Knowledge's core NPOV policy on this

1459:

of the article. Do you see only links from UIDAI? No. Even though primary sources have been used, secondary & tertiary sources have also been used. See the reasons in the edit summary given by Notabede the

2183:

You still don't understand Knowledge's policies. Please understand that you don't get to select which editors can edit this article. And also you simply cannot revert my edit of 10 December 2013 1 month later

340:... Our inability to apply concepts of statistical control to any or all of these factors will increase the level of uncertainty in our results and translate to loss of both repeatability and reproducibility. 1393:

and is primarily sourced from that authority's website instead of from reliable secondary sources. Equally, it appears that the 3rd editor who wrote this "highly POV" article was also indefinitely blocked.

3125:

Also, please say why you keep changing spellings to the American English form. Would not British/Indian spellings be more appropriate in an article about a topic with a strong national tie to India, per

1821:

The other editor you had the dispute with appears as blocked for arguing with an admin over number of reverts he was "entitled" to on another article Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act

261:

If the best that NIST can do is to say that the test results are the test results but there is no way of knowing how the "participating systems" will perform in the field, that seems to prove the point.

3317:, I have been referring to restore (Reverted to revision 601484804 by Ravishyam Bangalore (talk): Revert until after he acknowledges talk page discussion and abides by it.) of my edit pointed by diff: 1125:

Notabedes action to restore to a clear point which held the field for 2+ years after a series of highly POV edits by an indefinitely blocked user cannot be voted on here (but ought to be done on some

1937:

Yes! They are a set of questions that I pose to every person who disagrees with me. If even one could take his/her time to answer then this discussion might not have continued this long. I focus on "

3055:

1. Some of your changes got undone due to collateral damage. I will try to correct it. 2. Some of your changes made the intended meaning of my sentences opposite. We can discuss and bring changes.

222: 1597:

24 hours (by 03:10 12 December 2013 UTC) I will revert your edit too since it's baseless and without proper & detailed explanation. Only if you do not reply. Otherwise ignore this message. -

2226:

not with your POV text as the base. There is nothing wrong with the redirect, it leads the reader to an unbiased article about Aadhaar's issuing agency as User:Ruby_Murray also did to you here

480:

from scratch. It was a blank redirect page to UIDAI. The development was done in bits & pieces from 27-Oct-2013 to 18-Nov-2013 (about 3 weeks). I have spent considerable time and effort.

730: 335:... the test repeatability and reproducibility observed in technology tests are lost in scenario testing due to the loss of statistical control over a wide range of influence quantities. 1813:

That's OK with me too. We can use google/bing to search for additional links which can be used as references. We will start with the introduction and then continue downwards one by one.

1789: 1386: 1948:

Please don't call me arrogant for saying this but I literally do not have time & energy to argue with anyone here. I am really busy in my real life. You can even see that in

486:

Today I noticed by work of 3 weeks vandalized - made blank page redirect to which has almost no constructive content (against the spirit of encyclopedia to permeate knowledge).

3444: 1191: 1569:. It may or may not be for a good reason. So should all your edits should also be removed? Please give a properly reply to my earlier questions before saying anything else. - 240:

uncertainty of biometrics, there may be more factors, research is continuing, but, for the moment, measurement of the achievements or limitations of biometrics is impossible.

670:). Why I want the article to be back in sandbox is because it has a lot of relevant data and from there those points which are non-neutral can be removed to fine tune it. - 1672: 1426:. I see now the editor was temporarily blocked for 48 hours for edit warring and then indefinitely for arguing/warring with the blocking admin. Still; the change made by 882:

I think that simply because an article was redirect for 2 years is no valid reason for it not being developed in future. For example, there is already a redirect article

345:... Test data from scenario evaluations should not be used as input to mathematical models of operational environments that require high levels of certainty for validity. 982: 783: 315:

of value, provided that the specifics of the changes could be given, but we should not sanctify such a “guesstimate” in an emperor’s cloak of imagined analytic rigor.

3524:

Who is upset with Aadhaar - the social security number of India? The corrupts, fraudsters, illegal money lenders and launderers in India as they fear to be traced.

3328:

I agree to your suggestion and guidelines on use of lower case as per wiki policies. Now I feels it looks good to see the pages. My sincere thanks to you, Ohc and

1879:

and focuses on the conduct and past actions of other editors instead of the content at hand. I have observed that over a considerable period of time 5 editors have

1644:

Before addressing the copyright vio aspects, do you propose that the article version being thrust by you extensively references and promotes sources such as these

524:

and I are the same person, posting under two different accounts? And if you're trying to send me a message, then why haven't you bothered to post at my talk page?

325:

We lack metrics for assessing the expected variability of these quantities between tests and models for converting that variability to uncertainty in measurands .

1945:" and not the one that you are thinking. The thing that makes you different from Notabede is your acceptance that an article for this topic can indeed be created. 4053:

I have done an internet search to get details of the scam. Details of that, other than the sting operation by cobrapost.com is not available. Knowledge page on

3107:

again, please be aware that headings in wikipedia use sentence case, not title case. And we also don't randomly capitalize words for emphasis or whatever; see

47: 17: 1875:@Jayadevp: I am not here either to argue with you or to answer a laundry list of pointed questions posed to everybody who disagrees with you. Your behavior is 1455:

See Todst1's reply. He wasn't blocked for arguing to an admin. You said that the challenge was .... But did you verify them? See the references section in

760:@Notabede: Rather than reverting against consensus and requesting protection to your version, you should either try to reach consensus or drop the stick. 277:

I can see no evidence for the claim made by the user at 65.216.138.253 that "One of the authors (Wayman) is a consultant to UIDAI". Can you provide some?

3854:

The existing redirect page is about the organization which issues Aadhaar. It will not be fine to add about the information about Aadhaar on this page.

648:. On what basis are independent consensus of many past editors? In the past there have been only 2 complete blanking (except that of yours). Links are - 4029:

I still feel that there are details in there that are beyond Knowledge - but then, an article does not have to be perfect from the beginning either. --

3466:

The paragraph you added starting with "The identities given in the following table are meant for its specific use." doesn't make a lot of sense to me.

2206:@user:unfitlouie: Please talk of problems para-wise. We will resolve one by one. Please build consensus. Blanking info thru Redisrection is disruptive. 483:

You Ruby Murray (Soham Banerjee) also helped me a lot in making the sentences neutral, editing, formatting etc. which I acknowledged by thanking you.

1385:

The other editor you had the dispute with appears as blocked for arguing with an admin over number of reverts he was "entitled" to on another article

1651: 3624: 1988:

that Ravishyam_Bangalore is a known POV pusher and SPA for this article who is compromising the integrity of Knowledge by his repeated POV pushing,

1884: 1528: 1390: 720: 2307:

The following table displays the progress of assigned AN (state-wise). The up-to-date information is available on the official website of UIDAI.

1986: 698:

you have also used some language on my talk page which shows that you cannot edit in a neutral way when it comes to this article. Take care.

82: 1983: 1666: 207: 1687: 2254:

In order to improve the article further, I request people to contribute some pictures / images of Aadhaar letter and related items.

1200: 1356:

This is just a sort of extension to the the previous section. I wanted to tell that I found no copyright violations in the latest (

4009: 3920:

according to those standards, and get consensus here to overwrite this article (history merge). If you wish, you can start from

3644: 1949: 1230: 566:

I've just protected this page for one week. Please discuss the matter here instead of continually reverting each other about it.

1073:. Please invite others too if I have missed someone (those editors who came here just for gen fixes have not been mentioned). - 844:

I propose that everyone give their decision (in support, oppose or neutral) regarding reinstatement of the content removed by

3970: 913: 765: 617: 1725:

At first I would like to say sorry for my very late reply. I was suffering from a severe headache day before yesterday and

667: 602:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

3916:. If you think that you can write an article that is following our inclusion (and exclusion) standards then please write 3529: 3515: 3495: 3456: 3430: 3406: 3363: 3341: 3288: 3240: 3217: 3193: 3063: 3038: 2261: 2213: 2173: 2059: 2026: 1347:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

508: 442: 1657: 930:

user talk page (also containing personal attacks on me) was deleted by me, 'Jayadevp' has no business resurrecting it on

4057:

mentions a scam related to land allocation but found having no relation with Aadhaar. That details regarding the agency,

3682: 4079: 4033: 4018: 3974: 3933: 3902: 3848: 3826: 3769: 3743: 3686: 3653: 3615: 3558: 3533: 3519: 3499: 3475: 3460: 3434: 3410: 3390: 3367: 3345: 3307: 3292: 3268: 3244: 3221: 3197: 3170: 3139: 3120: 3098: 3083: 3067: 3042: 2995: 2970: 2265: 2238: 2217: 2200: 2177: 2153: 2119: 2097: 2079: 2063: 2030: 2001: 1967: 1924: 1859: 1801: 1745: 1701: 1639: 1612: 1584: 1540: 1515: 1488: 1443: 1418: 1402: 1379: 1337: 1315: 1164: 1139: 1103: 1088: 1028: 1008: 968: 947: 901: 877: 860:. A clear point version which had held the field for over 2 years. The same was done as per several policies including 836: 812: 769: 750: 707: 685: 634: 575: 553: 535: 512: 463: 446: 429: 393: 301: 286: 271: 215: 193: 163: 122: 90: 1660: 1216: 1663: 1648: 3757:

it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. --

2088:

I have restored the contents. Why should we make this large article a redirect. We can removed disputed contents.--

1500:

Please keep a look at this article until the problem is fully solved. Admin help and opinions might be required. -

38: 1189:

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is

406:

The contents on Aadhaar were removed from the UIDAI page by some people on the logic that Aadhaar related info is

1823:

and not the ones you told of course. Should I be blocked for asking genuine questions to clarify my doubts like

1778:

which is unclear or ambiguous ? If anybody is behaving in a disruptive way and deserves to be blocked it is you.

3525: 3511: 3491: 3452: 3426: 3402: 3359: 3337: 3284: 3236: 3213: 3189: 3059: 3034: 2257: 2209: 2169: 2055: 2022: 1039: 504: 457: 438: 421: 118: 86: 3353:

After Ohc did some restore today, I completed the rest manually. I took considerable time to restore manually.

1675: 1645: 953:

in future then it can be found easily by using the search box in my archive box. I didn't mean any offence. -

3832:

Changes to be article should be discussed on this page and backed by consensus. To request unprotecting, try

727:

it. it would be impossible to do that without keeping it at a place where other editors can also contribute.

211: 3791: 3708: 3580: 2966: 2286: 2110:

Please see the previous discussion. The entire content (especially see analysis of Turntinpro) is disputed.

1051: 521: 4013: 3648: 2991: 1558: 1262: 1055: 3985: 3951: 3917: 1678: 592:

has been now indefinitely blocked from editing Knowledge. A new discussion will be started if he returns.

114: 3988:. I think we should compulsorily mention about the charges of scam. But first I would like to know what 3322: 3266: 3168: 2962: 1920: 1797: 1697: 1635: 571: 530: 109: 96: 1566: 4005: 3958: 3670: 3640: 2234: 2196: 2149: 2115: 2093: 2075: 1997: 1960: 1852: 1738: 1605: 1577: 1536: 1508: 1481: 1439: 1398: 1372: 1308: 1246: 1220: 1157: 1081: 1021: 961: 894: 883: 829: 743: 678: 417: 389: 385: 381: 377: 373: 369: 365: 361: 357: 353: 297: 293: 282: 278: 267: 263: 203: 189: 185: 78: 1681: 3909: 3765: 1389:. The challenge to the long version of this article is that it is "highly POV" promotional for the 1205: 4071: 4061:

issuing Aadhaar could be included in this page too. Please update with the available information.

3966: 3947: 3894: 3818: 3735: 3674: 3607: 3471: 3386: 3303: 3233:

Requested you to undo my edit revert. I am awaiting as I have to update. Please do the needful.

3185:

Requested you to undo my edit revert. I am awaiting as I have to update. Please do the needful.

3135: 3116: 3094: 3079: 1590: 1333: 1252: 1183: 1135: 1099: 1004: 943: 873: 808: 703: 630: 613: 549: 3022:

Aadhaar is a semi-protected article as it faced lot of vandalism and Sock-puppetry in the past.

2044: 2036: 1466:

Duplicate article with a wrong spelling created by editor for POV pushing. and Original Research

3861:

the specific change needed is to remove the redirect and to develop it as an independent page.

3209:

Request you to undo my edit revert. I am awaiting as I have to update. Please do the needful.

3913: 3544: 2987: 1897:(Talk page edits are also warring) by disregarding and distorting the suggestion of Toddsl1 - 1690: 1562: 1413: 1063: 1038:

I particularly invite these people who were part of the article modification and discussion:

4075: 3898: 3822: 3739: 3678: 3611: 3378: 3257: 3159: 3149: 3127: 3016: 2986:

This has apparently been added by another user, who never marked the request as "answered".

2040: 1932: 1916: 1808: 1793: 1720: 1693: 1631: 1059: 1043: 861: 567: 525: 4043: 3993: 3628: 3449:

Opinion on adding some more important parameters in the above table, if any, are welcome.

3325:

did restore one table but not the other parts and table. My request is for these restore.

2230: 2192: 2145: 2136: 2111: 2089: 2071: 1993: 1953: 1876: 1845: 1731: 1618: 1598: 1570: 1548: 1532: 1501: 1474: 1450: 1435: 1427: 1394: 1365: 1301: 1150: 1123:

editor who keeps making personal attacks. This is without prejudice to my contention that

1074: 1070: 1014: 954: 887: 822: 736: 671: 2018:

People are invited to improve and develop this article further in a constructive manner.

4092: 2191:

and especially after you were indefinitely blocked for precisely this sort of behavior.

3843: 3833: 3758: 3230:, I had responded to you yesterday. I agreed to your most edits. Anything unanswered? 1902: 156: 3423:

Some sample pictures of Aadhaar letter / card is required to make the article better.

3298:

I am here. I didn't understand the odd requests above. What is it you want undone?

3182:, I had responded to you yesterday. I agreed to your most edits. Anything unanswered? 125:

Gail Porter Director of Public Affairs National Institute of Standards and Technology

4067: 4039: 4030: 3989: 3962: 3940: 3930: 3926: 3550: 3540: 3481: 3467: 3382: 3319:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Aadhaar&diff=601564827&oldid=601553460

3314: 3299: 3275: 3227: 3203: 3179: 3131: 3112: 3090: 3075: 3049: 1837: 1775: 1769: 1765: 1329: 1131: 1095: 1066: 1000: 939: 935: 869: 845: 804: 779: 761: 699: 626: 589: 545: 1361: 495: 490: 477: 1841: 1785: 1622: 1589:

Moreover, I had already said to Toddst1 about my reverting of Notabede's last edit

1554: 1495: 1408: 1280: 1268: 1236: 1146: 1126: 775: 544:

I explained something similar to this user. As well as warned him on his talk page.

1982:, and the overwhelming amount of evidence on Knowledge and also in public domain 1215:

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to

304:———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— 646:

redirected as per independent consensus of many past editors spanning many years

410:

there, and the UIDAI page should contain only the UIDAI Departmental info only.

398:——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— 274:——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— 196:——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3484:: Let me try improving it below. Please feel free to tell if still not clear: 3329: 2189:

Reverted. No changes be made without Consensus. Else we call in Administrator.

1669: 1047: 1013:

As I replied earlier, what Toddst1 said at the end is what I want to quote. -

179: 3858: 3839: 149: 3397:

on Voter ID article put by someone requesting linking with other articles.

3108: 413:

Hence the removed contents have been moved here on this page - Aadhaar.

1980: 1939:

conduct and past actions of other editors instead of the content at hand

3795: 3712: 3584: 1893:

It is abundantly clear that you are an outlier here and are repeatedly

1684: 1952:. I had last edited on 15 Dec. 2013 and came back only yesterday. - 778:

that the discussion should be further continued here rather than at

3254:

your data update. I don't see anything else that needs changing. --

1905:. Did I concur this article would be restored for "improving" it ? 4058: 4054: 2048: 2140:

attached to the end of your username, caused me to run this test

1726: 1621:

in your interactions with other editors and do not threaten to

817:

I am talking about the decision made by Toddst1 which reads as

661:

by Ravishyam Bangalore on 28 October 2013 and then you removed

3779: 3696: 3568: 2274: 1178: 1115:

my refusal to be drawn into an unproductive discussion with a

25: 729:

Your attitude is highly unco-operative and I am reporting it

1209:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, 1527:

In October 2013 the 3rd editor also edit warred with me on

2051:

and others, please help improve and develop this article.

794:. Don't use weasel words. The decision text is as follows 1901:

before restoring Ravishyam_Bangalore's content. You also

3921: 3318: 3251: 3153: 3145: 3104: 2227: 2185: 1888: 1461: 1456: 1357: 1300:- As per the reasons I gave at all the three places. - 662: 658: 653: 649: 1790:

Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act

1407:

The editor wasn't blocked for arguing with an admin.

1387:

Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act

914:

New link to initial discussion on Notabede's talk page

518:

This is the same message you posted 10 minutes ago at

3623:

It has not been deleted. Page currently redirects to

995:

on which was that 'Jayadevp' action to report me was

799:. In other words the finding is against you and your 1943:

the content should not be restored at one go . . . .

3939:I have cleaned-up the version of page suggested by 581:

WP:BRD for content blocked User:Ravishyam_Bangalore

1094:Inviting an indefinitely blocked user to comment? 520:], and at your own talk page. Are you saying that 4042:and am submitting for revisions. As mentioned by 3908:And that is where the problem lies here. We are 496:http://indiandefaulter.co.in/aadhaar-card-detail/ 4038:I have made some corrections to the version by 1625:. The present status for this article requires 1593:. See for yourself. If you do not reply within 886:, but it will surely be developed in future. - 2271:Semi-protected edit request on 29 January 2014 1766:imputed motives to other editors on talk pages 644:First I would like to reply to your statement 3148:on RB's talk page that RB doesn't agree with 1229:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected 1199:among Knowledge contributors. Knowledge has 221:The comments made by NIST have been answered 18:Talk:Unique Identification Authority of India 8: 1909:was with respect to your delay in replying. 255:PATRIOT Act. These certificates state that: 4070:, please suggest the necessary corrections 3776:Protected edit request on 29 September 2014 3693:Protected edit request on 26 September 2014 3662:Protected edit request on 18 September 2014 3565:Protected edit request on 17 September 2014 1829:"Why do you think it is original research?" 1360:) of the article. Checked with the help of 3668: 2309: 1203:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and 934:talk page. This is another example of the 1391:Unique Identification Authority of India 666:identification numbers (UIDs) and cards ( 3625:Unique Identification Authority of India 1885:Unique Identification Authority of India 1529:Unique Identification Authority of India 1223:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. 4095:. Portal.uidai.gov.in. 17 November 2010 4084: 774:This is with regard to the decision by 611:- Discussion originally continued from 3543:the article and your edits are highly 2311:Table of assigned Aadhaar Number (AN) 1974:Restoring this article to the redirect 1430:to restore controversial text without 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 7: 3152:, but has so far chosen not to heed 864:while seeking page protection. That 598:The following discussion is closed. 2187:with a rude edit summary like this 308:To the Knowledge moderators/editors 3950:please use the cleaned-up version 3445:Template:India document comparison 24: 4093:"Aadhaar - Unique Identification" 3929:), the rest needs a rewrite). -- 3864:To point out, few topics like 1462:first time he removed the content 868:is the 2+ year redirect to UIDAI. 3984:I have no problem in supporting 3783: 3749: 3700: 3572: 2974: 2278: 1883:the redirect of this article to 1825:"How exactly is it POV pushing?" 1343:The discussion above is closed. 1182: 909:Links that might be useful are: 137: 75:as a faulty basis for opinion. 29: 1762:Now concerning your own conduct 1434:as directed by you is improper. 721:National identification numbers 3849:14:09, 30 September 2014 (UTC) 3827:11:34, 29 September 2014 (UTC) 3770:16:35, 26 September 2014 (UTC) 3744:15:01, 26 September 2014 (UTC) 3687:05:20, 18 September 2014 (UTC) 3654:05:34, 17 September 2014 (UTC) 3616:05:29, 17 September 2014 (UTC) 3377:This article and others, like 1: 1968:05:33, 26 December 2013 (UTC) 1925:15:55, 15 December 2013 (UTC) 1899:agreement of numerous editors 1860:10:54, 15 December 2013 (UTC) 1802:08:04, 14 December 2013 (UTC) 1771:agreement of numerous editors 1746:06:13, 14 December 2013 (UTC) 1702:04:19, 12 December 2013 (UTC) 1640:01:31, 12 December 2013 (UTC) 1627:agreement of numerous editors 1613:03:10, 11 December 2013 (UTC) 1585:02:20, 11 December 2013 (UTC) 1541:02:11, 11 December 2013 (UTC) 1516:01:55, 11 December 2013 (UTC) 1489:01:55, 11 December 2013 (UTC) 1444:01:48, 11 December 2013 (UTC) 1432:agreement of numerous editors 1419:21:47, 10 December 2013 (UTC) 1403:19:33, 10 December 2013 (UTC) 1380:11:41, 10 December 2013 (UTC) 1323:for all the reasons given on 1219:on the part of others and to 733:so that they can take a look. 576:19:15, 25 November 2013 (UTC) 554:10:28, 19 November 2013 (UTC) 536:10:16, 19 November 2013 (UTC) 513:09:27, 19 November 2013 (UTC) 4080:04:46, 18 October 2014 (UTC) 4034:12:20, 15 October 2014 (UTC) 4019:11:48, 15 October 2014 (UTC) 3975:10:27, 15 October 2014 (UTC) 3934:08:48, 13 October 2014 (UTC) 3903:08:21, 13 October 2014 (UTC) 3321:. I hope it is pin-pointed. 2996:17:14, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 2971:10:15, 29 January 2014 (UTC) 2266:10:10, 17 January 2014 (UTC) 2239:07:28, 12 January 2014 (UTC) 2218:07:17, 12 January 2014 (UTC) 2201:06:46, 11 January 2014 (UTC) 2178:06:29, 11 January 2014 (UTC) 2154:06:46, 11 January 2014 (UTC) 2120:06:07, 11 January 2014 (UTC) 2098:05:58, 11 January 2014 (UTC) 2080:05:01, 11 January 2014 (UTC) 2064:04:30, 10 January 2014 (UTC) 2031:04:12, 10 January 2014 (UTC) 2002:06:54, 12 January 2014 (UTC) 1338:03:36, 4 December 2013 (UTC) 1316:12:36, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 1165:06:57, 4 December 2013 (UTC) 1140:03:36, 4 December 2013 (UTC) 1104:03:36, 4 December 2013 (UTC) 1089:12:36, 3 December 2013 (UTC) 1029:06:57, 4 December 2013 (UTC) 1009:03:36, 4 December 2013 (UTC) 969:06:57, 4 December 2013 (UTC) 948:03:36, 4 December 2013 (UTC) 902:06:57, 4 December 2013 (UTC) 878:03:36, 4 December 2013 (UTC) 837:06:57, 4 December 2013 (UTC) 813:03:36, 4 December 2013 (UTC) 770:16:09, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 751:14:42, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 708:09:53, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 686:08:28, 2 December 2013 (UTC) 659:started to be expanded again 635:05:23, 1 December 2013 (UTC) 464:17:27, 31 October 2013 (UTC) 447:15:41, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 430:08:27, 30 October 2013 (UTC) 3810:to reactivate your request. 3798:has been answered. Set the 3727:to reactivate your request. 3715:has been answered. Set the 3599:to reactivate your request. 3587:has been answered. Set the 2845:Andaman and Nicobar Islands 2301:to reactivate your request. 2289:has been answered. Set the 1990:I am restoring the redirect 384:) 01:12, 28 May 2011 (UTC) 376:) 01:10, 28 May 2011 (UTC) 368:) 16:52, 27 May 2011 (UTC) 360:) 16:50, 27 May 2011 (UTC) 4121: 3836:in a week or so. — Martin 3627:, seems more appropriate. 3368:11:37, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 3346:08:36, 31 March 2014 (UTC) 3308:19:54, 30 March 2014 (UTC) 3293:19:28, 30 March 2014 (UTC) 3269:12:15, 30 March 2014 (UTC) 3245:07:22, 30 March 2014 (UTC) 3222:18:39, 29 March 2014 (UTC) 3198:05:10, 29 March 2014 (UTC) 3171:07:43, 27 March 2014 (UTC) 3140:07:35, 27 March 2014 (UTC) 3121:07:32, 27 March 2014 (UTC) 3099:07:27, 27 March 2014 (UTC) 3084:07:21, 27 March 2014 (UTC) 3068:06:40, 27 March 2014 (UTC) 3043:06:35, 27 March 2014 (UTC) 588:The mainly involved user, 164:19:27, 4 August 2011 (UTC) 3943:with few recent updates. 3500:13:08, 8 April 2014 (UTC) 3476:03:52, 8 April 2014 (UTC) 3461:03:35, 8 April 2014 (UTC) 3435:03:13, 1 April 2014 (UTC) 3411:14:35, 2 April 2014 (UTC) 3391:04:44, 2 April 2014 (UTC) 3559:17:10, 5 June 2014 (UTC) 3534:12:34, 5 June 2014 (UTC) 3520:12:23, 5 June 2014 (UTC) 1784:, I've just completed a 1776:Always Assume Good Faith 1464:. They are as follows - 1345:Please do not modify it. 1040:User:Ravishyam Bangalore 600:Please do not modify it. 476:I developed the article 394:01:13, 28 May 2011 (UTC) 302:08:50, 2 June 2011 (UTC) 287:16:21, 27 May 2011 (UTC) 272:15:57, 27 May 2011 (UTC) 216:08:26, 31 May 2013 (UTC) 194:15:38, 27 May 2011 (UTC) 123:13:50, 26 May 2011 (UTC) 91:21:15, 25 May 2011 (UTC) 3927:'What Knowledge is not' 3156:to discuss it there. -- 2319:State / Union Territory 1352:No copyright violations 1261:; accounts blocked for 1231:single-purpose accounts 1201:policies and guidelines 1052:User:Royalrajasthan2013 766:See where I screwed up. 713:Too Long Didn't Read??? 3925:exclusion criteria in 2828:Dadra and Nagar Haveli 1788:review on the article 1559:Supreme Court of India 1056:User:Derek R Bullamore 522:User:Sohambanerjee1998 172:Opinion stated as fact 70:Opinion stated as fact 3886:Government directives 3323:User talk:Ohconfucius 489:My contribution from 180:Throwing the towel in 42:of past discussions. 3954:for further edits. 3910:not writing a manual 3874:Registration process 3871:Eligibility criteria 3146:extensive discussion 1817:Regarding my conduct 1630:discussion prevails. 983:Discussion at WP:ANI 979:The above discussion 884:2032 Summer Olympics 652:by Bwilkins and the 3952:User:Ipoll7/Aadhaar 3918:User:Ipoll7/Aadhaar 3526:Ravishyam Bangalore 3512:Ravishyam Bangalore 3492:Ravishyam Bangalore 3453:Ravishyam Bangalore 3427:Ravishyam Bangalore 3403:Ravishyam Bangalore 3360:Ravishyam Bangalore 3338:Ravishyam Bangalore 3285:Ravishyam Bangalore 3237:Ravishyam Bangalore 3214:Ravishyam Bangalore 3190:Ravishyam Bangalore 3103:Before you attempt 3060:Ravishyam Bangalore 3035:Ravishyam Bangalore 2312: 2258:Ravishyam Bangalore 2247:Aadhaar 17-Jan-2014 2210:Ravishyam Bangalore 2170:Ravishyam Bangalore 2056:Ravishyam Bangalore 2023:Ravishyam Bangalore 1903:need to listen more 1213:by counting votes. 1192:not a majority vote 938:he is making on me. 858:last stable version 856:the article to the 505:Ravishyam Bangalore 458:Ravishyam Bangalore 439:Ravishyam Bangalore 422:Ravishyam Bangalore 3440:New table template 3144:It seems from the 3011:Aadhaar March-2014 2310: 1890:by a 6th editor. 601: 4017: 3978: 3961:comment added by 3883:Security concerns 3847: 3814: 3813: 3731: 3730: 3689: 3673:comment added by 3652: 3603: 3602: 3505:Aadhaar June-2014 3265: 3167: 2960: 2959: 2913:Arunachal Pradesh 2726:Jammu and Kashmir 2322:Population (2011) 2305: 2304: 2251:Hello Wikiusers, 1834:Regarding MGNREGA 1417: 1294: 1293: 1290: 1217:assume good faith 1064:User:Randhirreddy 790:There is no such 599: 433: 420:comment added by 402:Aadhaar Oct-2013 206:comment added by 162: 81:comment added by 67: 66: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 4112: 4105: 4104: 4102: 4100: 4089: 4050: 4047: 4003: 4000: 3997: 3977: 3955: 3889:Future prospects 3837: 3805: 3801: 3787: 3786: 3780: 3761: 3753: 3752: 3722: 3718: 3704: 3703: 3697: 3638: 3635: 3632: 3594: 3590: 3576: 3575: 3569: 3557: 3555: 3419:Aadhaar Apr-2014 3379:Voter ID (India) 3264: 3261: 3255: 3166: 3163: 3157: 3017:User:Ohconfucius 3002:Aadhaar Sep-2014 2982: 2978: 2977: 2607:Himachal Pradesh 2328:% of population 2313: 2296: 2292: 2282: 2281: 2275: 2007:Aadhaar Jan-2014 1965: 1958: 1950:my contributions 1936: 1857: 1850: 1812: 1743: 1736: 1724: 1610: 1603: 1582: 1575: 1555:Aadhaar Oct-2013 1553:See the section 1552: 1513: 1506: 1499: 1486: 1479: 1454: 1411: 1377: 1370: 1362:Copyvio Detector 1313: 1306: 1288: 1276: 1260: 1244: 1225: 1195:, but instead a 1186: 1179: 1162: 1155: 1086: 1079: 1060:User:Ruby Murray 1044:User:Mark Arsten 1026: 1019: 966: 959: 936:personal attacks 899: 892: 834: 827: 748: 741: 725: 719: 683: 676: 533: 528: 473:Hi Ruby Murray, 437:Now signing it. 432: 414: 218: 161: 159: 153: 147: 145: 141: 140: 110:{{Request edit}} 97:{{Request edit}} 93: 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4120: 4119: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4111: 4110: 4109: 4108: 4098: 4096: 4091: 4090: 4086: 4048: 4045: 3998: 3995: 3956: 3893:are desirable. 3803: 3799: 3784: 3778: 3759: 3750: 3720: 3716: 3701: 3695: 3664: 3633: 3630: 3592: 3588: 3573: 3567: 3551: 3548: 3507: 3442: 3421: 3375: 3259: 3256: 3234: 3210: 3186: 3161: 3158: 3013: 3004: 2975: 2973: 2294: 2290: 2279: 2273: 2249: 2137:User:Wikiuser13 2009: 1976: 1961: 1954: 1930: 1907:That's quite OK 1853: 1846: 1806: 1739: 1732: 1718: 1606: 1599: 1578: 1571: 1546: 1509: 1502: 1493: 1482: 1475: 1448: 1373: 1366: 1354: 1349: 1348: 1309: 1302: 1278: 1266: 1250: 1234: 1221:sign your posts 1177: 1158: 1151: 1082: 1075: 1071:User:Epicgenius 1022: 1015: 962: 955: 895: 888: 830: 823: 768: 744: 737: 723: 717: 679: 672: 604: 595: 594: 593: 583: 564: 531: 526: 471: 415: 404: 201: 175: 157: 151: 148: 138: 136: 76: 72: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4118: 4116: 4107: 4106: 4083: 4065: 4064: 4063: 4062: 4036: 4024: 4023: 4022: 4021: 3937: 3936: 3914:a crystal ball 3891: 3890: 3887: 3884: 3881: 3878: 3875: 3872: 3869: 3868:Basic features 3857:As a reply to 3852: 3851: 3812: 3811: 3788: 3777: 3774: 3773: 3772: 3729: 3728: 3705: 3694: 3691: 3663: 3660: 3659: 3658: 3657: 3656: 3601: 3600: 3577: 3566: 3563: 3562: 3561: 3506: 3503: 3479: 3478: 3441: 3438: 3420: 3417: 3415: 3399: 3398: 3374: 3371: 3357: 3356: 3355: 3354: 3311: 3310: 3272: 3271: 3232: 3208: 3184: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3123: 3101: 3086: 3047: 3012: 3009: 3003: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2958: 2957: 2954: 2951: 2948: 2945: 2941: 2940: 2937: 2934: 2931: 2928: 2924: 2923: 2920: 2917: 2914: 2911: 2907: 2906: 2903: 2900: 2897: 2894: 2890: 2889: 2886: 2883: 2880: 2877: 2873: 2872: 2869: 2866: 2863: 2860: 2856: 2855: 2852: 2849: 2846: 2843: 2839: 2838: 2835: 2832: 2829: 2826: 2822: 2821: 2818: 2815: 2812: 2809: 2805: 2804: 2801: 2798: 2795: 2792: 2788: 2787: 2784: 2781: 2778: 2775: 2771: 2770: 2767: 2764: 2761: 2758: 2754: 2753: 2750: 2747: 2744: 2741: 2737: 2736: 2733: 2730: 2727: 2724: 2720: 2719: 2716: 2713: 2710: 2707: 2703: 2702: 2699: 2696: 2693: 2690: 2686: 2685: 2682: 2679: 2676: 2673: 2669: 2668: 2665: 2662: 2659: 2656: 2652: 2651: 2648: 2645: 2642: 2639: 2635: 2634: 2631: 2628: 2625: 2622: 2618: 2617: 2614: 2611: 2608: 2605: 2601: 2600: 2597: 2594: 2591: 2588: 2584: 2583: 2580: 2577: 2574: 2571: 2567: 2566: 2563: 2560: 2557: 2554: 2550: 2549: 2546: 2543: 2540: 2537: 2533: 2532: 2529: 2526: 2523: 2520: 2516: 2515: 2512: 2509: 2506: 2503: 2499: 2498: 2495: 2492: 2489: 2486: 2482: 2481: 2478: 2475: 2472: 2469: 2465: 2464: 2461: 2458: 2455: 2452: 2448: 2447: 2444: 2441: 2438: 2435: 2431: 2430: 2427: 2424: 2421: 2418: 2414: 2413: 2410: 2407: 2404: 2403:Madhya Pradesh 2401: 2397: 2396: 2393: 2390: 2387: 2384: 2380: 2379: 2376: 2373: 2370: 2369:Andhra Pradesh 2367: 2363: 2362: 2359: 2356: 2353: 2350: 2346: 2345: 2342: 2339: 2336: 2333: 2330: 2329: 2326: 2323: 2320: 2317: 2303: 2302: 2283: 2272: 2269: 2248: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2204: 2203: 2165: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2083: 2082: 2008: 2005: 1975: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1946: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1831: 1814: 1779: 1759: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1587: 1525: 1524: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1491: 1353: 1350: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1318: 1292: 1291: 1187: 1176: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1031: 986: 985: 980: 976: 975: 974: 973: 972: 971: 926:discussion on 917: 916: 907: 906: 905: 904: 842: 841: 840: 839: 764: 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 642: 605: 596: 587: 586: 585: 584: 582: 579: 563: 560: 559: 558: 557: 556: 539: 538: 470: 467: 454: 451: 436: 403: 400: 174: 168: 167: 166: 132: 131: 115:Gailjporter333 83:65.216.138.253 71: 68: 65: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4117: 4094: 4088: 4085: 4082: 4081: 4077: 4073: 4069: 4068:Dirk Beetstra 4060: 4056: 4052: 4051: 4041: 4037: 4035: 4032: 4031:Dirk Beetstra 4028: 4027: 4026: 4025: 4020: 4015: 4011: 4010:Contributions 4007: 4002: 4001: 3991: 3987: 3983: 3982: 3981: 3980: 3979: 3976: 3972: 3968: 3964: 3960: 3953: 3949: 3944: 3942: 3941:Dirk Beetstra 3935: 3932: 3931:Dirk Beetstra 3928: 3923: 3919: 3915: 3911: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3904: 3900: 3896: 3888: 3885: 3882: 3879: 3876: 3873: 3870: 3867: 3866: 3865: 3862: 3860: 3855: 3850: 3845: 3841: 3835: 3831: 3830: 3829: 3828: 3824: 3820: 3809: 3806:parameter to 3797: 3793: 3789: 3782: 3781: 3775: 3771: 3767: 3763: 3756: 3748: 3747: 3746: 3745: 3741: 3737: 3726: 3723:parameter to 3714: 3710: 3706: 3699: 3698: 3692: 3690: 3688: 3684: 3680: 3676: 3672: 3661: 3655: 3650: 3646: 3645:Contributions 3642: 3637: 3636: 3626: 3622: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3618: 3617: 3613: 3609: 3598: 3595:parameter to 3586: 3582: 3578: 3571: 3570: 3564: 3560: 3556: 3554: 3546: 3542: 3538: 3537: 3536: 3535: 3531: 3527: 3522: 3521: 3517: 3513: 3504: 3502: 3501: 3497: 3493: 3489: 3485: 3483: 3477: 3473: 3469: 3465: 3464: 3463: 3462: 3458: 3454: 3450: 3447: 3446: 3439: 3437: 3436: 3432: 3428: 3424: 3418: 3416: 3413: 3412: 3408: 3404: 3395: 3394: 3393: 3392: 3388: 3384: 3380: 3372: 3370: 3369: 3365: 3361: 3352: 3351: 3350: 3349: 3348: 3347: 3343: 3339: 3334: 3331: 3326: 3324: 3320: 3316: 3315:User:Dicklyon 3309: 3305: 3301: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3294: 3290: 3286: 3282: 3279: 3277: 3276:User:Dicklyon 3270: 3267: 3263: 3262: 3253: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3246: 3242: 3238: 3231: 3229: 3228:User:Dicklyon 3224: 3223: 3219: 3215: 3207: 3205: 3204:User:Dicklyon 3200: 3199: 3195: 3191: 3183: 3181: 3180:User:Dicklyon 3172: 3169: 3165: 3164: 3155: 3151: 3147: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3137: 3133: 3129: 3124: 3122: 3118: 3114: 3110: 3106: 3102: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3087: 3085: 3081: 3077: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3065: 3061: 3056: 3053: 3051: 3050:User:Dicklyon 3045: 3044: 3040: 3036: 3031: 3027: 3023: 3020: 3018: 3010: 3008: 3001: 2997: 2993: 2989: 2985: 2984: 2983: 2981: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2963:Ankurt.kanpur 2955: 2952: 2949: 2946: 2943: 2942: 2938: 2935: 2932: 2929: 2926: 2925: 2921: 2918: 2915: 2912: 2909: 2908: 2904: 2901: 2898: 2895: 2892: 2891: 2887: 2884: 2881: 2878: 2875: 2874: 2870: 2867: 2864: 2862:Daman and Diu 2861: 2858: 2857: 2853: 2850: 2847: 2844: 2841: 2840: 2836: 2833: 2830: 2827: 2824: 2823: 2819: 2816: 2813: 2810: 2807: 2806: 2802: 2799: 2796: 2793: 2790: 2789: 2785: 2782: 2779: 2776: 2773: 2772: 2768: 2765: 2762: 2759: 2756: 2755: 2751: 2748: 2745: 2742: 2739: 2738: 2734: 2731: 2728: 2725: 2722: 2721: 2717: 2714: 2711: 2708: 2705: 2704: 2700: 2697: 2694: 2691: 2688: 2687: 2683: 2680: 2677: 2674: 2671: 2670: 2666: 2663: 2660: 2657: 2654: 2653: 2649: 2646: 2643: 2640: 2637: 2636: 2632: 2629: 2626: 2623: 2620: 2619: 2615: 2612: 2609: 2606: 2603: 2602: 2598: 2595: 2592: 2589: 2586: 2585: 2581: 2578: 2575: 2572: 2569: 2568: 2564: 2561: 2558: 2555: 2552: 2551: 2547: 2544: 2541: 2539:Uttar Pradesh 2538: 2535: 2534: 2530: 2527: 2524: 2521: 2518: 2517: 2513: 2510: 2507: 2504: 2501: 2500: 2496: 2493: 2490: 2487: 2484: 2483: 2479: 2476: 2473: 2470: 2467: 2466: 2462: 2459: 2456: 2453: 2450: 2449: 2445: 2442: 2439: 2436: 2433: 2432: 2428: 2425: 2422: 2419: 2416: 2415: 2411: 2408: 2405: 2402: 2399: 2398: 2394: 2391: 2388: 2385: 2382: 2381: 2377: 2374: 2371: 2368: 2365: 2364: 2360: 2357: 2354: 2351: 2348: 2347: 2343: 2340: 2338:1,210,593,422 2337: 2334: 2332: 2331: 2327: 2324: 2321: 2318: 2315: 2314: 2308: 2300: 2297:parameter to 2288: 2284: 2277: 2276: 2270: 2268: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2255: 2252: 2246: 2240: 2236: 2232: 2228: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2202: 2198: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2142: 2138: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2052: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2033: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2019: 2016: 2012: 2006: 2004: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1987: 1984: 1981: 1973: 1969: 1966: 1964: 1959: 1957: 1951: 1947: 1944: 1940: 1934: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1891: 1889: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1861: 1858: 1856: 1851: 1849: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1832: 1830: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1815: 1810: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1787: 1783: 1780: 1777: 1773: 1772: 1767: 1763: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1751:That quite OK 1749: 1748: 1747: 1744: 1742: 1737: 1735: 1728: 1722: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1688: 1685: 1682: 1679: 1676: 1673: 1670: 1667: 1664: 1661: 1658: 1655: 1652: 1649: 1646: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1611: 1609: 1604: 1602: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1586: 1583: 1581: 1576: 1574: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1550: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1517: 1514: 1512: 1507: 1505: 1497: 1492: 1490: 1487: 1485: 1480: 1478: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1458: 1452: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1415: 1410: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1378: 1376: 1371: 1369: 1363: 1359: 1351: 1346: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1326: 1322: 1319: 1317: 1314: 1312: 1307: 1305: 1299: 1296: 1295: 1286: 1282: 1274: 1270: 1264: 1258: 1254: 1248: 1242: 1238: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1222: 1218: 1212: 1208: 1207: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1193: 1188: 1185: 1181: 1180: 1174: 1166: 1163: 1161: 1156: 1154: 1148: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1130: 1129:notice board. 1128: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1087: 1085: 1080: 1078: 1072: 1068: 1067:User:2Awwsome 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1030: 1027: 1025: 1020: 1018: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1006: 1002: 998: 994: 990: 989: 988: 987: 984: 981: 978: 977: 970: 967: 965: 960: 958: 951: 950: 949: 945: 941: 937: 933: 929: 925: 921: 920: 919: 918: 915: 912: 911: 910: 903: 900: 898: 893: 891: 885: 881: 880: 879: 875: 871: 867: 863: 859: 855: 851: 850: 849: 847: 838: 835: 833: 828: 826: 820: 816: 815: 814: 810: 806: 802: 798: 793: 789: 788: 787: 785: 781: 777: 772: 771: 767: 763: 752: 749: 747: 742: 740: 734: 732: 722: 714: 711: 710: 709: 705: 701: 697: 692: 689: 688: 687: 684: 682: 677: 675: 669: 664: 660: 655: 651: 647: 643: 639: 638: 637: 636: 632: 628: 622: 621: 619: 616: 615: 610: 603: 591: 580: 578: 577: 573: 569: 561: 555: 551: 547: 543: 542: 541: 540: 537: 534: 529: 523: 519: 517: 516: 515: 514: 510: 506: 501: 500:Please help. 498: 497: 492: 487: 484: 481: 479: 474: 468: 466: 465: 461: 459: 455: 449: 448: 444: 440: 434: 431: 427: 425: 423: 419: 411: 409: 401: 399: 396: 395: 391: 387: 383: 379: 375: 371: 367: 363: 359: 355: 352: 347: 346: 342: 341: 337: 336: 332: 331: 327: 326: 322: 321: 317: 316: 311: 309: 305: 303: 299: 295: 289: 288: 284: 280: 275: 273: 269: 265: 259: 256: 252: 249: 245: 241: 237: 233: 229: 226: 224: 219: 217: 213: 209: 208:106.79.68.150 205: 197: 195: 191: 187: 182: 181: 173: 169: 165: 160: 155: 154: 144: 134: 133: 128: 127: 126: 124: 120: 116: 112: 111: 105: 101: 98: 94: 92: 88: 84: 80: 69: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4097:. Retrieved 4087: 4066: 4044: 3994: 3992:has to say. 3957:— Preceding 3945: 3938: 3892: 3880:Implications 3877:Architecture 3863: 3856: 3853: 3815: 3807: 3792:edit request 3754: 3732: 3724: 3709:edit request 3669:— Preceding 3665: 3629: 3604: 3596: 3581:edit request 3552: 3523: 3508: 3490: 3486: 3480: 3451: 3448: 3443: 3425: 3422: 3414: 3400: 3376: 3358: 3335: 3327: 3312: 3283: 3280: 3273: 3258: 3235: 3225: 3211: 3201: 3187: 3177: 3160: 3057: 3054: 3046: 3032: 3028: 3024: 3021: 3014: 3005: 2988:Joefromrandb 2979: 2961: 2658:Chhattisgarh 2306: 2298: 2287:edit request 2256: 2253: 2250: 2208: 2205: 2188: 2168: 2164: 2053: 2034: 2020: 2017: 2013: 2010: 1989: 1977: 1962: 1955: 1942: 1938: 1913:To summarise 1912: 1911: 1906: 1898: 1895:Edit Warring 1894: 1892: 1880: 1874: 1854: 1847: 1833: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1786:Good Article 1781: 1770: 1761: 1754: 1750: 1740: 1733: 1626: 1607: 1600: 1594: 1579: 1572: 1567:Uncletomwood 1563:Wb10versinfo 1526: 1510: 1503: 1483: 1476: 1469: 1465: 1457:this version 1431: 1423: 1374: 1367: 1358:this version 1355: 1344: 1324: 1320: 1310: 1303: 1297: 1284: 1272: 1263:sockpuppetry 1256: 1245:; suspected 1240: 1226: 1214: 1210: 1204: 1196: 1190: 1159: 1152: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1083: 1076: 1037: 1023: 1016: 996: 992: 963: 956: 931: 927: 923: 908: 896: 889: 865: 857: 853: 843: 831: 824: 818: 800: 795: 791: 773: 759: 745: 738: 728: 712: 695: 690: 680: 673: 663:this version 645: 623: 612: 608: 607: 606: 597: 565: 502: 499: 488: 485: 482: 475: 472: 456: 450: 435: 416:— Preceding 412: 408:not suitable 407: 405: 397: 349: 348: 344: 343: 339: 338: 334: 333: 329: 328: 324: 323: 319: 318: 313: 312: 307: 306: 290: 276: 260: 257: 253: 250: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 227: 225:as follows: 220: 202:— Preceding 198: 178: 176: 171: 170:Response to 150: 142: 113: 106: 102: 95: 77:— Preceding 73: 60: 43: 37: 3545:promotional 3281:R u there? 2896:Lakshadweep 2675:Uttarakhand 2627:103,804,637 2542:199,581,477 2454:West Bengal 2355:112,372,972 2352:Maharashtra 2341:574,413,712 2325:Assigned AN 1933:Turnitinpro 1917:Turnitinpro 1809:Turnitinpro 1794:Turnitinpro 1721:Turnitinpro 1694:Turnitinpro 1632:Turnitinpro 866:clear point 641:discussion. 625:many years. 568:Mark Arsten 491:UIDAI pages 386:Brother Big 378:Brother Big 370:Brother Big 362:Brother Big 354:Brother Big 294:Brother Big 279:Brother Big 264:Brother Big 186:Brother Big 36:This is an 4099:29 January 3986:this draft 3800:|answered= 3717:|answered= 3589:|answered= 3539:You don't 3330:user:Tony1 3250:I already 3154:my request 2882:31,169,272 2760:Chandigarh 2729:12,548,926 2709:Puducherry 2678:10,116,752 2661:25,540,196 2596:16,491,029 2593:16,753,235 2579:17,358,365 2576:41,947,358 2562:17,566,854 2559:25,753,081 2545:22,713,350 2528:23,252,502 2525:27,704,236 2511:24,806,151 2508:60,383,628 2494:25,432,956 2491:32,966,238 2477:29,877,230 2474:33,387,677 2460:33,316,837 2457:91,347,736 2443:37,492,936 2440:68,621,012 2426:40,630,181 2423:61,130,704 2409:41,352,957 2406:72,597,565 2392:42,895,015 2389:72,138,958 2386:Tamil Nadu 2375:78,415,935 2372:84,665,533 2358:82,259,625 2291:|answered= 2231:Unfitlouie 2193:Unfitlouie 2146:Unfitlouie 2112:Unfitlouie 2090:Wikiuser13 2072:Unfitlouie 2045:Wikiuser13 2037:Jayadevp13 1994:Unfitlouie 1549:Unfitlouie 1533:Unfitlouie 1451:Unfitlouie 1436:Unfitlouie 1428:Jayadevp13 1395:Unfitlouie 1197:discussion 1048:User:EVula 654:second one 562:Protection 177:The paper 3859:User:MSGJ 3755:Not done: 3553:LeoFrank 3401:Regards, 3336:Regards, 3212:Regards, 3188:Regards, 3150:WP:ENGVAR 3128:WP:ENGVAR 3105:this edit 3058:Regards, 3033:Regards, 2950:1,091,014 2933:2,964,007 2930:Meghalaya 2916:1,382,611 2780:1,980,602 2763:1,054,686 2746:2,721,756 2732:1,077,829 2715:1,129,031 2712:1,244,464 2698:1,327,125 2695:1,457,723 2681:2,138,852 2664:2,339,186 2647:3,111,570 2644:3,671,032 2630:5,862,905 2613:6,334,821 2610:6,856,509 2488:Jharkhand 2437:Rajasthan 2420:Karnataka 2054:Regards, 2021:Regards, 1881:preferred 1253:canvassed 1247:canvassed 1206:consensus 1117:frivolous 997:frivolous 924:frivolous 862:WP:PREFER 801:frivolous 650:First one 503:Regards, 494:records. 478:"Aadhaar" 223:elsewhere 146:for now. 61:Archive 1 4040:Marlisco 3990:LeoFrank 3971:contribs 3963:Marlisco 3959:unsigned 3683:contribs 3671:unsigned 3482:Dicklyon 3468:Dicklyon 3383:Dicklyon 3373:Advocacy 3300:Dicklyon 3252:put back 3132:Dicklyon 3113:Dicklyon 3109:MOS:CAPS 3091:Dicklyon 3076:Dicklyon 2777:Nagaland 2011:Hello, 1956:Jayadevp 1848:Jayadevp 1734:Jayadevp 1623:edit war 1601:Jayadevp 1595:36 hours 1573:Jayadevp 1504:Jayadevp 1477:Jayadevp 1368:Jayadevp 1330:Notabede 1328:number). 1304:Jayadevp 1285:username 1279:{{subst: 1273:username 1267:{{subst: 1257:username 1251:{{subst: 1241:username 1235:{{subst: 1153:Jayadevp 1132:Notabede 1096:Notabede 1077:Jayadevp 1017:Jayadevp 1001:Notabede 993:decision 957:Jayadevp 940:Notabede 922:As this 890:Jayadevp 870:Notabede 854:restored 846:Notabede 825:Jayadevp 805:Notabede 803:actions. 792:decision 782:section 762:2Awwsome 739:Jayadevp 700:Notabede 674:Jayadevp 668:See here 627:Notabede 618:new link 590:Notabede 546:Notabede 418:unsigned 251:UNQUOTE 204:unsigned 143:Not done 135:Marking 79:unsigned 3834:WP:RFPP 3796:Aadhaar 3713:Aadhaar 3585:Aadhaar 2947:Mizoram 2905:75.70% 2871:65.25% 2868:158,489 2865:242,911 2854:42.71% 2851:162,265 2848:379,944 2837:52.01% 2834:178,319 2831:342,853 2820:89.50% 2817:543,880 2814:607,688 2800:654,836 2786:41.03% 2783:812,730 2769:86.21% 2766:909,285 2752:34.21% 2749:931,038 2743:Manipur 2718:90.72% 2701:91.04% 2684:21.14% 2650:84.76% 2641:Tripura 2616:92.39% 2599:98.43% 2582:41.38% 2565:68.21% 2556:Haryana 2548:11.38% 2531:83.93% 2514:41.08% 2505:Gujarat 2497:77.15% 2480:89.48% 2463:36.47% 2446:54.64% 2429:66.46% 2412:56.96% 2395:59.46% 2378:92.62% 2361:73.20% 2344:47.44% 1877:uncivil 1496:Toddst1 1409:Toddst1 1298:Support 1249:users: 1121:uncivil 1109:Warning 776:Toddst1 469:Aadhaar 39:archive 4072:Ipoll7 4046:Occult 3996:Occult 3948:Ipoll7 3895:Ipoll7 3819:Ipoll7 3762:rose64 3736:Ipoll7 3675:Ipoll7 3631:Occult 3608:Ipoll7 3541:WP:OWN 3313:Hello 3274:Hello 3226:Hello 3202:Hello 3178:Hello 3048:Hello 3015:Hello 2956:0.94% 2953:10,208 2939:0.36% 2936:10,811 2922:0.87% 2919:12,015 2902:48,771 2899:64,429 2888:0.18% 2885:55,316 2811:Sikkim 2794:Others 2735:8.59% 2667:9.16% 2633:5.65% 2573:Odisha 2522:Punjab 2471:Kerala 2316:Serial 2041:Bhutes 2035:Hello 1838:WP:ANI 1758:topic. 1321:Oppose 784:Aadhar 780:WP:ANI 532:Murray 351:tests. 228:QUOTE 130:again. 4059:UIDAI 4055:UIDAI 3804:|ans= 3790:This 3721:|ans= 3707:This 3593:|ans= 3579:This 2879:Assam 2624:Bihar 2590:Delhi 2335:INDIA 2295:|ans= 2285:This 2049:Soham 1842:WP:CP 1619:CIVIL 1561:with 1424:Sorry 1227:Note: 1147:WP:DE 1127:WP:DR 797:(UTC) 152:Chzz 16:< 4101:2014 4076:talk 4049:Zone 4006:Talk 3999:Zone 3967:talk 3922:this 3899:talk 3844:talk 3840:MSGJ 3823:talk 3766:talk 3740:talk 3679:talk 3641:Talk 3634:Zone 3612:talk 3530:talk 3516:talk 3496:talk 3472:talk 3457:talk 3431:talk 3407:talk 3387:talk 3364:talk 3342:talk 3304:talk 3289:talk 3260:Ohc 3241:talk 3218:talk 3194:talk 3162:Ohc 3136:talk 3117:talk 3095:talk 3080:talk 3064:talk 3039:talk 2992:talk 2980:Done 2967:talk 2262:talk 2235:talk 2214:talk 2197:talk 2174:talk 2150:talk 2116:talk 2094:talk 2076:talk 2060:talk 2027:talk 1998:talk 1921:talk 1827:and 1798:talk 1727:BSNL 1698:talk 1692:, ? 1636:talk 1591:here 1565:and 1537:talk 1440:talk 1414:talk 1399:talk 1364:. - 1334:talk 1325:this 1175:Vote 1136:talk 1119:and 1100:talk 1069:and 1005:talk 991:The 944:talk 874:talk 809:talk 731:here 704:talk 691:TLDR 631:talk 614:here 609:Note 572:talk 550:talk 527:Ruby 509:talk 443:talk 426:] • 390:talk 382:talk 374:talk 366:talk 358:talk 298:talk 283:talk 268:talk 212:talk 190:talk 119:talk 87:talk 4014:Log 3802:or 3794:to 3760:Red 3719:or 3711:to 3649:Log 3591:or 3583:to 3278:, 3130:? 3111:. 2803:NA 2692:Goa 2293:or 1840:or 1782:FYI 1774:or 1755:ALL 1617:Be 1470:you 1281:csp 1277:or 1269:csm 1237:spa 1211:not 932:his 848:. 786:. 696:NB: 462:]) 428:]) 4078:) 4012:• 4008:• 3973:) 3969:• 3901:) 3842:· 3825:) 3808:no 3768:) 3742:) 3725:no 3685:) 3681:• 3647:• 3643:• 3614:) 3597:no 3547:. 3532:) 3518:) 3498:) 3474:) 3459:) 3433:) 3409:) 3389:) 3366:) 3344:) 3306:) 3291:) 3243:) 3220:) 3206:, 3196:) 3138:) 3119:) 3097:) 3082:) 3066:) 3052:, 3041:) 3019:, 2994:) 2969:) 2944:36 2927:35 2910:34 2893:33 2876:32 2859:31 2842:30 2825:29 2808:28 2791:27 2774:26 2757:25 2740:24 2723:23 2706:22 2689:21 2672:20 2655:19 2638:18 2621:17 2604:16 2587:15 2570:14 2553:13 2536:12 2519:11 2502:10 2299:no 2264:) 2237:) 2229:. 2216:) 2199:) 2176:) 2152:) 2118:) 2096:) 2078:) 2062:) 2047:, 2043:, 2039:, 2029:) 2000:) 1985:, 1963:13 1923:) 1855:13 1800:) 1741:13 1700:) 1689:, 1686:, 1683:, 1680:, 1677:, 1674:, 1671:, 1668:, 1665:, 1662:, 1659:, 1656:, 1653:, 1650:, 1647:, 1638:) 1608:13 1580:13 1539:) 1511:13 1484:13 1442:) 1401:) 1375:13 1336:) 1311:13 1287:}} 1275:}} 1265:: 1259:}} 1243:}} 1233:: 1160:13 1138:) 1113:Or 1102:) 1084:13 1062:, 1058:, 1054:, 1050:, 1046:, 1042:, 1024:13 1007:) 964:13 946:) 928:my 897:13 876:) 852:I 832:13 821:- 811:) 746:13 735:- 724:}} 718:{{ 706:) 681:13 633:) 574:) 552:) 511:) 445:) 392:) 300:) 285:) 270:) 214:) 192:) 158:► 121:) 89:) 4103:. 4074:( 4016:) 4004:( 3965:( 3946:@ 3897:( 3846:) 3838:( 3821:( 3764:( 3738:( 3677:( 3651:) 3639:( 3610:( 3549:— 3528:( 3514:( 3494:( 3470:( 3455:( 3429:( 3405:( 3385:( 3362:( 3340:( 3302:( 3287:( 3239:( 3216:( 3192:( 3134:( 3115:( 3093:( 3078:( 3062:( 3037:( 2990:( 2965:( 2797:0 2485:9 2468:8 2451:7 2434:6 2417:5 2400:4 2383:3 2366:2 2349:1 2260:( 2233:( 2212:( 2195:( 2172:( 2148:( 2114:( 2092:( 2074:( 2058:( 2025:( 1996:( 1935:: 1931:@ 1919:( 1811:: 1807:@ 1796:( 1723:: 1719:@ 1696:( 1634:( 1551:: 1547:@ 1535:( 1498:: 1494:@ 1453:: 1449:@ 1438:( 1416:) 1412:( 1397:( 1332:( 1289:. 1283:| 1271:| 1255:| 1239:| 1134:( 1098:( 1003:( 999:. 942:( 872:( 807:( 702:( 629:( 620:. 570:( 548:( 507:( 460:( 441:( 424:( 388:( 380:( 372:( 364:( 356:( 296:( 281:( 266:( 210:( 188:( 117:( 85:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index