42:
285:
No! The lead is not introducing anything "new"; instead the terms mentioned are explained - the scholars in terms of people named in the body of the article in the "Analysis" section, whose research papers are listed in the "References". There is thus no "vagueness" at all: the lead is summarizing
335:
I've looked over your additions and I do find them problematic, in multiple ways. It would be appreciated if you'd undo all of them, and work conventionally by making suggestions here on this review page, so that I can reply to them individually, only changing the article if need be. Many thanks.
266:
Um, as I said above, the "introduction", known as the lead, is purely a summary of the cited text in the main part, the body, of the article. The lead is not directly cited as a rule because it uses the cited material below. See below for why it's not a good move for you to edit the
466:
I've added a summary of Jain's argument to the article. She actually doesn't use the phrase "cultural appropriation" (nor is either half of it in the index) but she's clearly discussing the same topic. Hope that's better for you!
316:
helpful. We should take your materials as suggestions - they would be far better placed here, or in your sandbox than in the article - as we will have a difficulty if we disagree, moving towards an edit-war rather than consensus.
307:
As I've explained on your talk page, that is rather unwise, as it crosses the line of separation between the roles of reviewer - responsible for evaluating and commenting - and of nominator - responsible for editing. Please see
282:" is under lens. It is not clear who are these practitioners in India and what are the western yoga practices. If it has a verifiable source then we can look into it, else we can consider other options.
47:
126:
274:
First paragraph throws light on Yoga while second paragraph outlines the cultural appropriation. The third paragraph need to be scrutinized. The vagueness in repeated use of the term
122:
107:
52:
99:
309:
80:
449:
Obviously; my first set of comments will arrive in about 96 hours. Btw, I am not impressed that Andrea R. Jain's monograph (OUP; 2014) is not among the citations.
70:
369:
239:
This is normal for articles on
Knowledge. The lead summarizes cited text in the body of the article, and as such does not repeat citations.
115:
17:
313:
157:
92:
75:
213:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
359:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
502:
472:
440:
423:
395:
341:
322:
253:
180:
454:
409:
377:
197:
166:
418:
Done that just now. If you want to add a further note on their talk page, that might be a good thing.
263:
Hi, I have tried to improve the article by expanding the introduction for the benefit of the reader.
506:
476:
458:
444:
427:
413:
399:
381:
345:
326:
302:
298:
257:
201:
184:
170:
151:
404:
Anand2202's edits are blatant POV-pushing and need to be reverted. Then, we can start the GAR ...
498:
468:
436:
419:
391:
337:
318:
249:
176:
494:
463:
450:
432:
405:
373:
193:
162:
497:: glad to see you're out of the woods now. Would be pleased if we could get this GAN done!
294:
245:
147:
224:
This article mentions the direction of a continent as place of origin. This is vague.
293:
In the mean time, I would be adding some more content to the article.
225:
280:
practitioners in India have adopted western yoga practices
372:; in that case, I will take over the responsibilities.
228:, a good article, clearly mentions the Indian origins.
134:
103:
310:Knowledge:Good article nominations/Instructions
286:precise, verifiable facts found in the article.
370:It appears that Anand2202 has recused himself
8:
435:- are you planning to do this GAN review?
30:
61:
33:
236:Lead of the article has no citations.
219:Preliminary Observations by Anand2202
7:
209:The following discussion is closed.
18:Talk:Yoga and cultural appropriation
312:; you may also find the guideline
24:
314:Knowledge:Reviewing good articles
355:The discussion above is closed.
175:Many thanks for taking this on.
1:
160:) 03:47, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
477:09:57, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
459:23:18, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
445:19:10, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
428:11:50, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
414:11:49, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
400:11:48, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
382:11:46, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
346:09:12, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
327:09:02, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
303:05:59, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
258:12:46, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
202:11:46, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
171:11:46, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
185:08:29, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
527:
507:12:32, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
357:Please do not modify it.
278:and in the sentence by "
211:Please do not modify it.
390:Thank you very much!
192:Review by Anand2202.
512:Preliminary issues
212:
210:
89:
88:
518:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
526:
525:
521:
520:
519:
517:
516:
515:
514:
366:
361:
360:
221:
215:
206:
205:
204:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
524:
522:
513:
510:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
480:
479:
385:
384:
365:
362:
354:
353:
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
330:
329:
290:
289:
288:
287:
271:
270:
269:
268:
243:
242:
241:
240:
234:
233:
232:
220:
217:
216:
207:
191:
190:
189:
188:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
523:
511:
509:
508:
504:
500:
499:Chiswick Chap
496:
478:
474:
470:
469:Chiswick Chap
465:
462:
461:
460:
456:
452:
448:
447:
446:
442:
438:
437:Chiswick Chap
434:
431:
430:
429:
425:
421:
420:Chiswick Chap
417:
416:
415:
411:
407:
403:
402:
401:
397:
393:
392:Chiswick Chap
389:
388:
387:
386:
383:
379:
375:
371:
368:
367:
363:
358:
347:
343:
339:
338:Chiswick Chap
334:
333:
332:
331:
328:
324:
320:
319:Chiswick Chap
315:
311:
306:
305:
304:
300:
296:
292:
291:
284:
283:
281:
277:
273:
272:
265:
264:
262:
261:
260:
259:
255:
251:
250:Chiswick Chap
247:
238:
237:
235:
230:
229:
227:
223:
222:
218:
214:
203:
199:
195:
187:
186:
182:
178:
177:Chiswick Chap
173:
172:
168:
164:
161:
159:
156:
153:
149:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
495:TrangaBellam
493:
464:TrangaBellam
451:TrangaBellam
433:TrangaBellam
406:TrangaBellam
374:TrangaBellam
364:Review by TB
356:
279:
275:
244:
208:
194:TrangaBellam
174:
163:TrangaBellam
154:
146:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
104:visual edit
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
295:Anand2202
246:Anand2202
148:Anand2202
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
276:scholars
267:article.
158:contribs
76:Criteria
127:history
108:history
94:Article
231:Done.
136:Watch
16:<
503:talk
473:talk
455:talk
441:talk
424:talk
410:talk
396:talk
378:talk
342:talk
323:talk
299:talk
254:talk
226:Yoga
198:talk
181:talk
167:talk
152:talk
123:edit
100:edit
505:)
475:)
457:)
443:)
426:)
412:)
398:)
380:)
344:)
325:)
301:)
256:)
248:?
200:)
183:)
169:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
501:(
471:(
453:(
439:(
422:(
408:(
394:(
376:(
340:(
321:(
297:(
252:(
196:(
179:(
165:(
155:·
150:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.