147:
252:
477:
242:
221:
388:
137:
116:
945:
this reads as if it was intentional by the mints, but my interpretation of the body is that this it mostly a lucky break for numismatists. "The lower denomination coins", what denominations! Understandable the article focuses on the 1 Yuan, but if there is something more to be said for the others, I would expect to see it here. Broadly happy on the first light read to sign off on GACR 4, 5, and the aforementioned 6, will take a closer look later.
738:
334:
710:
702:
673:
653:
642:
613:
602:
85:
21:
835:
1218:
NGC 2015 for its cited sentence.One the GACR3, the only clear oddity is the lack of collecting, which is mentioned in the lead. NGC 2015 hints at a wide number of varieties. A potential other gap is when the coins left circulation, but the replacement coins are mentioned so the topic seems broached. Good if something more could be added, but not critical.
1217:
For spotchecks, Dean 2018 checks out, doesn't exactly have "begin" by itself out of context, but in context with the
December 1914 start date it seems reasonable. I could not find the other 3 mentioned on TWL. Nonetheless, Italian Numismatic Society 2024 checks out GARC2wise for the footnote, as does
944:
Will be looking at this. "Fatman dollar" seems a bit unfair! Some design motifs are apparent as persisting to this day, although 壹圓 is in the opposite order. Very kind of
Museums Victoria to release its images as it has. An initial question regarding "mainly serving as a substitute for mint marks",
741:
References were spot-checked for verification; no issues arose. I would suggest changing "emperor" to "president" though, because Yuan Shikai's tenure as the first president of the
Republic is more notable than his brief stint as a pretender to the throne, hence his common description by historians
1102:
Taels did continue to be a unit of trade silver by the late 19th century, but it was mainly a unit of weight; I'm not sure whether the
Beiyang government actually produced physical taels or just used the predefined weight to define other coinage; I rephrased to make sure its understood as a weight
1135:
About to get to this but re:spotchecking, I sadly can't help much with that, as the best books older sources on
Chinese numismatics have not been digitized. :( Kann (1953) is a rare volume I had to get on interlibrary loan, while Shih is a reprint I had to purchase on Amazon. Dean, Jin, and both
1006:
The first sentence of "Background and creation" could use some tweaking for wider comprehension. "the domestic production of silver dollars or yuan" does not make it immediately clear what "yuan" refers to. "dubbed Dragon dollars for their design" also feels an anachronism.
1179:
Might be worth duplicating the term mint mark from the lead in the body too, where "These were intended as a way to identify which mint produced a given coin" does help me. If there is more information on that practice/decision that would be nice, although not required for
1198:"China abruptly abandoned the silver standard in 1935, with large amounts of paper currency circulating in its place, the circulation of which halted regional production of the Yuan Shikai dollar." Something about this sentence isn't flowing for me.
1039:"By early 1914, the Ministry of Finance had reopened the central mint, but continued to use the dragon dollar design", not sure there should be a "but" here, and perhaps the wording could be further tweaked to state production restarted or similar.
1047:"A centrally-produced silver dollar issue entered production by the end of 1912", how so given the previous paragraph stated the central mint only reopened in 1914 and still produced dragon dollars?
1262:
1112:
Stopping for now, but noting I am having trouble spotchecking. Are you accessing these sources offline, or could you point to one or two that can be accessed through something like TWL?
1055:"ceased to recognize the Imperial silver dollars" requires an earlier introduction of "imperial", perhaps the first sentence of the section could be tweaked to say "imperial China"?
524:
761:
I was initially going to put
President, but I think the fact that a republic continued to put someone who declared himself emperor on their coinage is funny and interesting to me.
460:
380:
995:"dollar coins were produced by various mints across China from 1914 to 1928" should have some sort of qualifier given later exceptions, perhaps "regularly produced" or similar.
840:
873:
1195:"Although the Nationalist government halted production of the coin" in just the capital? Or elsewhere? What makes production "local", outside of Nationalist control?
863:
312:
1257:
193:
1031:
I made a slight tweak to "the republic's early currency", but something more is needed to make it clear that the
Beiyang Government is the republic in question.
376:
1277:
302:
1287:
1091:"The coin's weight varies by several grains" could this be rewritten in something more plural? The weight varied by mint, or within lines, or similar.
1282:
1063:
The first paragraph of Design and specifications also contradicts the 1912 sentence. It's also unclear if the commemorative silver dollar was issued.
278:
203:
1247:
845:
1252:
1183:
The "Fatman dollar" name should similarly be in the body. Come to think of it, no mention of collecting in the body outside of the gold coins?
32:
1272:
56:. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to
265:
226:
1267:
934:
912:
169:
868:
488:
53:
659:
476:
1202:
Production history overall well written. Footnotes are sourced aside from the obvious CALC one. Will try to spotcheck in a bit.
667:
96:
1242:
421:
160:
121:
168:
related articles on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1023:"The central mint in Tianjin", if we don't have an article on the central mint, probably worth linking just to Tianjin.
891:
785:
441:
58:
636:
63:
887:
696:
607:
596:
102:
1223:
1207:
1165:
1142:
1117:
983:
973:
950:
928:
906:
803:
794:
781:
767:
550:
535:
438:
43:
663:
1015:"the base unit" should probably be extended to "the base unit of currency" for wider comprehensibility.
349:
277:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
387:
84:
1079:"taken from the previous pattern issue", don't suppose there's anything that could be linked here?
493:
365:
1219:
1203:
1161:
1154:
1138:
1130:
1113:
979:
969:
962:
946:
924:
902:
799:
777:
763:
546:
531:
257:
39:
333:
241:
220:
136:
115:
647:
1192:
How do we know Fuzhou's coins were substandard if no identification techniques are known?
1236:
751:
571:
406:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
1083:
152:
52:
An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the
354:
270:
1108:
No comments on the Other denominations subsection at the moment, nice addition.
967:
Oops! Forgot about the other denominations entirely; added the info about them.
737:
412:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
1227:
1211:
1170:
1147:
1121:
988:
954:
938:
916:
808:
789:
772:
755:
575:
555:
444:
274:
247:
142:
344:
1099:
Was the Kuping tael also being produced by the
Beiyang government in 1914?
894:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
744:
564:
511:
507:
424:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
1001:
Wright says this was somewhat intentional, but I added some context.
165:
328:
78:
15:
780:
I don't believe the article verifies that he was an emperor.
629:
Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
386:
62:, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a
465:
456:
1071:"The final design" for the standard issue presumably?
525:
Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Oxford_(toy_company)
379:. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
1189:
Were the Fuzhou mint's 20c pieces Yuan Shikai pieces?
1136:
Wrights are accessible on TWL through JSTOR however.
742:
and in his article as the "first Chinese president".
682:
622:
582:
381:
Template:Did you know nominations/Yuan Shikai coinage
269:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
164:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
689:Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
1263:B-Class China-related articles of Low-importance
377:Knowledge (XXG):Recent additions/2024/September
8:
426:No further edits should be made to this page
823:
215:
110:
1186:The Anjing mint sentence needs attention.
357:). The text of the entry was as follows:
363:... that the Republic of China produced
854:
826:
287:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Numismatics
217:
112:
82:
31:is currently an Economics and business
589:Article is new enough and long enough
1288:Knowledge (XXG) Did you know articles
1258:Low-importance China-related articles
512:https://www.jstor.org/stable/42666643
508:https://www.jstor.org/stable/42667176
375:A record of the entry may be seen at
66:should be left to the first reviewer.
7:
542:. Nominator has 77 past nominations.
263:This article is within the scope of
158:This article is within the scope of
494:coins featuring emperor Yuan Shikai
366:coins featuring emperor Yuan Shikai
101:It is of interest to the following
1278:Low-importance numismatic articles
14:
1159:And I've implemented your fixes.
998:Same mintmark comment as before.
562:I will do a full review shortly.
422:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Did you know
178:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject China
1283:WikiProject Numismatics articles
736:
708:
700:
671:
651:
640:
611:
600:
475:
332:
290:Template:WikiProject Numismatics
250:
240:
219:
145:
135:
114:
83:
70:Short description: Chinese coins
19:
1248:Good article nominees on review
409:Please do not modify this page.
307:This article has been rated as
198:This article has been rated as
1253:B-Class China-related articles
1228:12:59, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
1212:10:16, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
445:18:48, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
343:appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s
48:at 23:29, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
1:
1171:17:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
1148:17:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
1122:05:02, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
989:20:06, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
955:05:31, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
939:05:31, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
809:20:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
790:11:55, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
500:for decades after his demise?
372:for decades after his demise?
353:column on 19 September 2024 (
281:and see a list of open tasks.
172:and see a list of open tasks.
1086:in its first appearance. - G
892:Talk:Yuan Shikai coinage/GA1
538:). Number of QPQs required:
1273:B-Class numismatic articles
917:23:29, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
773:05:12, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
756:04:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
719:
576:20:44, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
556:20:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
414:this nomination's talk page
1304:
1268:WikiProject China articles
313:project's importance scale
204:project's importance scale
181:Template:WikiProject China
306:
235:
197:
130:
109:
418:the article's talk page
399:Did you know nomination
266:WikiProject Numismatics
391:
184:China-related articles
91:This article is rated
1243:Good article nominees
1050:Oops, typo. 1914. - G
782:~~ AirshipJungleman29
390:
95:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
54:good article criteria
660:copyright violations
33:good article nominee
341:Yuan Shikai coinage
293:numismatic articles
29:Yuan Shikai coinage
795:AirshipJungleman29
668:close paraphrasing
481:Yuan Shikai dollar
439:AirshipJungleman29
392:
258:Numismatics portal
97:content assessment
1169:
1146:
1082:No, but I linked
987:
977:
882:
881:
807:
771:
730:
729:
718:
717:
681:
680:
637:Adequate sourcing
621:
620:
554:
489:Republic of China
396:
395:
327:
326:
323:
322:
319:
318:
214:
213:
210:
209:
161:WikiProject China
77:
76:
71:
49:
47:
1295:
1160:
1158:
1137:
1134:
978:
968:
966:
836:Copyvio detector
824:
798:
762:
749:
740:
720:
712:
711:
704:
703:
683:
675:
674:
655:
654:
644:
643:
623:
615:
614:
604:
603:
583:
569:
545:
479:
433:The result was:
411:
336:
329:
295:
294:
291:
288:
285:
260:
255:
254:
253:
244:
237:
236:
231:
223:
216:
186:
185:
182:
179:
176:
155:
150:
149:
148:
139:
132:
131:
126:
118:
111:
94:
88:
87:
79:
69:
38:
36:
23:
22:
16:
1303:
1302:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1233:
1232:
1152:
1128:
960:
886:This review is
878:
850:
822:
817:
754:
745:
709:
701:
672:
652:
641:
612:
601:
574:
565:
543:
517:
484:
483:
482:
472:
470:
466:Article history
407:
401:
292:
289:
286:
283:
282:
256:
251:
249:
229:
183:
180:
177:
174:
173:
151:
146:
144:
124:
92:
73:
59:the review page
20:
12:
11:
5:
1301:
1299:
1291:
1290:
1285:
1280:
1275:
1270:
1265:
1260:
1255:
1250:
1245:
1235:
1234:
1231:
1230:
1200:
1199:
1196:
1193:
1190:
1187:
1184:
1181:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1110:
1109:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1004:
1003:
1002:
996:
992:
991:
943:
897:
896:
880:
879:
877:
876:
871:
866:
860:
857:
856:
852:
851:
849:
848:
846:External links
843:
838:
832:
829:
828:
821:
818:
816:
815:
814:
813:
812:
811:
743:
728:
727:
716:
715:
714:
713:
705:
691:
690:
679:
678:
677:
676:
656:
645:
631:
630:
619:
618:
617:
616:
605:
591:
590:
581:
580:
578:
563:
529:
528:
527:
516:
515:
503:
502:
501:
480:
474:
473:
469:
468:
463:
453:
451:
447:
431:
430:
402:
400:
397:
394:
393:
384:
374:
373:
337:
325:
324:
321:
320:
317:
316:
309:Low-importance
305:
299:
298:
296:
279:the discussion
262:
261:
245:
233:
232:
230:Low‑importance
224:
212:
211:
208:
207:
200:Low-importance
196:
190:
189:
187:
170:the discussion
157:
156:
140:
128:
127:
125:Low‑importance
119:
107:
106:
100:
89:
75:
74:
26:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1300:
1289:
1286:
1284:
1281:
1279:
1276:
1274:
1271:
1269:
1266:
1264:
1261:
1259:
1256:
1254:
1251:
1249:
1246:
1244:
1241:
1240:
1238:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1197:
1194:
1191:
1188:
1185:
1182:
1178:
1177:
1172:
1167:
1163:
1162:Generalissima
1156:
1155:Chipmunkdavis
1151:
1150:
1149:
1144:
1140:
1139:Generalissima
1132:
1131:Chipmunkdavis
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1107:
1101:
1100:
1098:
1093:
1092:
1090:
1085:
1081:
1080:
1078:
1073:
1072:
1070:
1065:
1064:
1062:
1057:
1056:
1054:
1049:
1048:
1046:
1041:
1040:
1038:
1033:
1032:
1030:
1025:
1024:
1022:
1017:
1016:
1014:
1009:
1008:
1005:
1000:
999:
997:
994:
993:
990:
985:
981:
980:Generalissima
975:
971:
970:Generalissima
964:
963:Chipmunkdavis
959:
958:
957:
956:
952:
948:
941:
940:
936:
933:
930:
926:
925:Chipmunkdavis
923:
919:
918:
914:
911:
908:
904:
903:Generalissima
901:
895:
893:
889:
884:
883:
875:
872:
870:
867:
865:
862:
861:
859:
858:
853:
847:
844:
842:
839:
837:
834:
833:
831:
830:
825:
819:
810:
805:
801:
800:Generalissima
796:
793:
792:
791:
787:
783:
779:
778:Generalissima
776:
775:
774:
769:
765:
764:Generalissima
760:
759:
758:
757:
753:
750:
748:
739:
734:
725:
722:
721:
707:Interesting:
706:
698:
695:
694:
693:
692:
688:
685:
684:
669:
665:
661:
657:
649:
646:
638:
635:
634:
633:
632:
628:
625:
624:
609:
606:
598:
595:
594:
593:
592:
588:
585:
584:
579:
577:
573:
570:
568:
561:
560:
559:
557:
552:
548:
547:Generalissima
541:
537:
533:
532:Generalissima
526:
522:
519:
518:
513:
509:
505:
504:
499:
496:
495:
490:
487:... that the
486:
485:
478:
467:
464:
462:
458:
455:
454:
450:
448:
446:
443:
440:
436:
429:
427:
423:
419:
415:
410:
404:
403:
398:
389:
385:
382:
378:
371:
368:
367:
362:
359:
358:
356:
352:
351:
346:
342:
338:
335:
331:
330:
314:
310:
304:
301:
300:
297:
280:
276:
272:
268:
267:
259:
248:
246:
243:
239:
238:
234:
228:
225:
222:
218:
205:
201:
195:
192:
191:
188:
171:
167:
163:
162:
154:
143:
141:
138:
134:
133:
129:
123:
120:
117:
113:
108:
104:
98:
90:
86:
81:
80:
72:
67:
65:
61:
60:
55:
50:
45:
41:
40:Generalissima
37:Nominated by
34:
30:
25:
18:
17:
1201:
1111:
1084:pattern coin
942:
931:
921:
920:
909:
899:
898:
885:
874:Instructions
746:
732:
731:
723:
686:
626:
586:
566:
544:
539:
520:
497:
492:
449:
434:
432:
425:
417:
413:
408:
405:
369:
364:
361:Did you know
360:
350:Did you know
348:
340:
339:A fact from
308:
264:
199:
159:
153:China portal
103:WikiProjects
68:
64:good article
57:
51:
28:
27:
1168:) (it/she)
1145:) (it/she)
1103:anyhow. - G
986:) (it/she)
976:) (it/she)
888:transcluded
806:) (it/she)
770:) (it/she)
608:Long enough
553:) (it/she)
530:Created by
510:pp.313–314
355:check views
284:Numismatics
271:numismatics
227:Numismatics
46:) (it/she)
1237:Categories
1066:Fixed. - G
1010:Fixed. - G
900:Nominator:
841:Authorship
827:GA toolbox
664:plagiarism
597:New enough
498:(pictured)
370:(pictured)
275:currencies
1094:Done. - G
1058:Done. - G
1042:Done. - G
1034:Okay. - G
1026:Okay. - G
1018:Done. - G
922:Reviewer:
864:Templates
855:Reviewing
820:GA Review
491:produced
345:Main Page
1074:Yep. - G
935:contribs
913:contribs
869:Criteria
726:: Done.
658:Free of
587:General:
521:Reviewed
506:Source:
435:promoted
797:Fixed.
733:Overall
648:Neutral
627:Policy:
457:Comment
347:in the
311:on the
202:on the
93:B-class
1127:Okay!
666:, and
514:p. 149
99:scale.
890:from
697:Cited
687:Hook:
175:China
166:China
122:China
1224:talk
1208:talk
1166:talk
1143:talk
1118:talk
984:talk
974:talk
951:talk
929:talk
907:talk
804:talk
786:talk
768:talk
551:talk
536:talk
461:view
442:talk
273:and
44:talk
1220:CMD
1204:CMD
1180:GA.
1114:CMD
947:CMD
747:Yue
724:QPQ
567:Yue
459:or
437:by
420:or
303:Low
194:Low
1239::
1226:)
1210:)
1120:)
953:)
937:)
915:)
788:)
752:🌙
735::
699::
670::
662:,
650::
639::
610::
599::
572:🌙
558:.
523::
452:(
416:,
35:.
1222:(
1206:(
1164:(
1157::
1153:@
1141:(
1133::
1129:@
1116:(
982:(
972:(
965::
961:@
949:(
932:·
927:(
910:·
905:(
802:(
784:(
766:(
549:(
540:1
534:(
471:)
428:.
383:.
315:.
206:.
105::
42:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
