Knowledge

Template:Did you know nominations/Dami Mission

Source 📝

279:
two girls...told reporters they never believed in the Rapture anyway, although their parents were inside, crying in despair because they had not been lifted", or "Mainstream churches in South Korea denounced the prediction as blasphemy, and civil authorities labelled the Dami Mission as a dangerous cult" with "condemned as blasphemy by mainstream churches and by civil authorities as a dangerous cult", or "hit by a sudden surge in deserters and applications for early discharge, and subsequently announced they would begin screening all material brought into the barracks by soldiers" with "hit by a sudden surge in deserters and applications for early discharge, recently announced that it would begin screening all material being carried into the barracks by soldiers".
30: 224: 332: 352: 201: 294:
I've reworded the "Eight minutes later" sentence and the 'army deserters' sentence. I haven't reworded the 'mainstream churches' sentence as I don't see how I could reword that very much considering information on this particular subject is limited to one line in the reference (also considering that
278:
I think there's still quite a bit of closeness in phrasing and structure. Compare for example "Eight minutes later, two girls told reporters they had never believed in the rapture, and said that their parents were inside the building crying because they were still there" with "Eight minutes later,
251:
Fixed the date error - my bad. I don't know how that happened - I must of have misread it the first time and then just got it in my head and stuck with it. I've reworded the mass suicide sentence mentioned above. I've also reworded the "vision" mention and added a wikilink for clarity. If there is
227:
I can't believe I didn't catch this prior to promoting it a few minutes ago, but the date of the prediction is wrong: it was October 28, 1992, not October 22 as stated in the hook and article. And, once I checked a bit further, I found that there is still far too much close paraphrasing for my
204:
Newly created: Yes, it was created on 30 December 2012 and nominated on 4 January 2012, exactly five days. Article size: Good enough. Copyright/Close-paraphrasing: There aren't any obvious violations anymore. I gave the article some trimming because I enjoyed reading it. Hook: Well sourced and
295:
I think the sentence is a fair rewording myself, but that's just my opinion). I'm happy for anybody else to try rewording it or incorporating it elsewhere. If that sentence is the only thing holding this nomination back I will gladly delete it in order to get this nomination passed.
298:
This is my first serious attempt to nominate an article for DYK, so I don't have any experience in this. Accordingly I can't see anything wrong with the article, so please just be specific in telling me what needs improving and I will work on it myself immediately.
314:
I (a transient journey-gnome) have copyedited for grammar and readability, and hope that it now addresses the points above. Therefore I request that another editor review suitability for DYK. Regards.
355:
Thanks to Chienlit and Nikkimaria, this article is now good to go. No other close paraphrasing that I could see, references check out, hook is verified and cited, long enough, new enough. Go go go!
391: 335:
I've made some further edits to deal with remaining paraphrasing issues, so a new reviewer is needed to verify that all necessary improvements have been made.
228:
comfort. Compare, for example, the article's "based off a vision which came to a 16 year old boy" with "based on a vision that came to a 16-year-old boy" from
263:
I have since gone through the entire article and after making several changes I believe the article is now free from close paraphrasing and errors.
63: 232:, and the identical phrases "police took elaborate precautions to ensure that mass suicides would not occur" from both the article and 17: 91: 154: 51: 175:
church predicted the world would end on October 28, 1992, but used donations from his followers to purchase
241: 340: 284: 210: 206: 233: 320: 304: 268: 257: 189: 138: 59:. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived 116: 77: 237: 336: 280: 229: 176: 331: 385: 358: 316: 300: 264: 253: 185: 134: 111: 29: 223: 236:. A great deal of work remains to be done before this article is at DYK standards. 171: 42: 351: 200: 252:
anything else wrong with the article please let me know and I will fix it.
101:. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. 159: 192:). Self nominated at 06:05, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 8: 104:No further edits should be made to this page 179:that did not mature until after that date? 392:Passed DYK nominations from January 2013 37:The following is an archived discussion 7: 24: 205:interesting. This is good to go. 18:Template:Did you know nominations 350: 330: 222: 199: 28: 141:) 18:12, 5 February 2013 (UTC) 57:Please do not modify this page 1: 343:) 23:36, 8 January 2013 (UTC) 323:) 15:53, 8 January 2013 (UTC) 307:) 01:29, 6 January 2013 (UTC) 287:) 22:21, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 271:) 01:25, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 260:) 00:30, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 244:) 22:32, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 213:) 08:45, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 363:10:34, 5 February 2013 (UTC) 169:... that the founder of the 408: 184:Created/expanded by 112:talk page guidelines 193: 89:DYK WikiProject's 399: 354: 334: 226: 203: 183: 129:The result was: 124: 107: 73:, the nominated 48: 38: 32: 407: 406: 402: 401: 400: 398: 397: 396: 382: 381: 380: 166: 164: 160:Article history 148: 142: 108: 102: 46: 36: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 405: 403: 395: 394: 384: 383: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 368: 367: 366: 365: 364: 345: 344: 325: 324: 309: 308: 296: 289: 288: 273: 272: 261: 246: 245: 234:this newspaper 217: 216: 215: 214: 181: 180: 163: 162: 157: 155:Back to T:TDYK 151: 149: 147: 144: 127: 126: 52:DYK nomination 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 404: 393: 390: 389: 387: 362: 361: 360: 353: 349: 348: 347: 346: 342: 338: 333: 329: 328: 327: 326: 322: 318: 313: 312: 311: 310: 306: 302: 297: 293: 292: 291: 290: 286: 282: 277: 276: 275: 274: 270: 266: 262: 259: 255: 250: 249: 248: 247: 243: 239: 235: 231: 225: 221: 220: 219: 218: 212: 208: 202: 198: 197: 196: 195: 194: 191: 187: 178: 174: 173: 168: 167: 161: 158: 156: 153: 152: 145: 143: 140: 136: 132: 125: 122: 120: 114: 113: 105: 100: 99: 95: 90: 86: 85: 81: 76: 72: 71: 67: 62: 58: 54: 53: 45: 44: 39: 31: 27: 26: 19: 357: 356: 182: 172:Dami Mission 170: 146:Dami Mission 130: 128: 123:information. 118: 110: 103: 97: 93: 88: 83: 79: 74: 69: 65: 61:nomination's 60: 56: 50: 43:Dami Mission 41: 35: 34: 33:   238:BlueMoonset 230:this source 337:Nikkimaria 281:Nikkimaria 207:ComputerJA 87:, or the 75:article's 386:Category 359:Moswento 317:Chienlit 301:Freikorp 265:Freikorp 254:Freikorp 186:Freikorp 135:Miyagawa 131:promoted 109:See the 177:bonds 47:' 16:< 341:talk 321:talk 305:talk 285:talk 269:talk 258:talk 242:talk 211:talk 190:talk 139:talk 119:more 115:for 98:page 94:talk 84:page 80:talk 70:page 66:talk 133:by 40:of 388:: 150:( 96:) 82:) 68:) 55:. 49:s 339:( 319:( 303:( 283:( 267:( 256:( 240:( 209:( 188:( 165:) 137:( 121:) 117:( 106:. 92:( 78:( 64:(

Index

Template:Did you know nominations
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination
Dami Mission
DYK nomination
(talk) page
(talk) page
(talk) page
talk page guidelines
(more)
Miyagawa
talk
Back to T:TDYK
Article history
Dami Mission
bonds
Freikorp
talk

ComputerJA
talk

this source
this newspaper
BlueMoonset
talk
Freikorp
talk
Freikorp
talk
Nikkimaria

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.