151:"is is done first by proving that the infringement falls within one of the three categories, which are liberally interpreted by the courts" - referenced to Bently & Sherman (2009) p.203 and "This can be contrasted with the United States doctrine of fair use, which provides a general defence rather than rigid and specific categories of acceptable behaviour" from Bently & Sherman (2009) p.202.
164:
167:
OK, after some consideration I buy it. Would suggest that the first-indicated sentence be referenced w/the ref in the sentence that follows it, as you never know when they will be separated by a subsequent editor (in which case it would no longer be clear that the ref applies to the sentence prior
139:
Length of article is fine, and hook is correct length. The sentence that matches the hook in the lede is unreferenced (which is fine), but I had difficulty finding the parallel text matching the hook w/the ref in the body - perhaps nom can help by pointing me to the section? The article is quite
216:
109:
36:
90:
17:
40:
73:
43:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
199:
57:
173:
145:
188:
156:
123:
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
195:
53:
169:
141:
184:
152:
119:
210:
163:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
95:
194:
I've removed italics from the hook as nothing requires it.
78:
168:
to the one to which it was appended). Good to go.--
94:
is interpreted liberally, it is still narrower than
8:
126:). Self nom at 06:18, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
217:Passed DYK nominations from August 2011
7:
91:Fair dealing in United Kingdom law
65:Fair dealing in United Kingdom law
24:
41:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Did you know
18:Template:Did you know nominations
162:
159:) 07:18, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
148:) 06:00, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
1:
202:) 13:10, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
191:) 09:17, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
176:) 08:25, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
60:) 00:27, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
96:the United States equivalent
233:
32:Please do not modify it.
37:the article's talk page
88:... that although
127:
224:
166:
117:
48:The result was:
34:
232:
231:
227:
226:
225:
223:
222:
221:
207:
206:
205:
85:
83:
79:Article history
67:
61:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
230:
228:
220:
219:
209:
208:
204:
203:
192:
181:
180:
179:
178:
177:
136:
135:
134:
133:
115:
114:
113:
112:
110:Paul H. Bruske
100:
99:
82:
81:
76:
74:Back to T:TDYK
70:
68:
66:
63:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
229:
218:
215:
214:
212:
201:
197:
193:
190:
186:
182:
175:
171:
165:
161:
160:
158:
154:
150:
149:
147:
143:
138:
137:
132:
131:
130:
129:
128:
125:
121:
111:
107:
104:
103:
102:
101:
97:
93:
92:
87:
86:
80:
77:
75:
72:
71:
64:
62:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
140:well done.--
118:Created by
116:
105:
89:
49:
47:
31:
28:
196:Crisco 1492
54:Crisco 1492
183:Now done.
170:Epeefleche
142:Epeefleche
185:Ironholds
153:Ironholds
120:Ironholds
211:Category
106:Reviewed
50:promoted
16:<
200:talk
189:talk
174:talk
157:talk
146:talk
124:talk
58:talk
52:by
39:or
213::
108::
69:(
198:(
187:(
172:(
155:(
144:(
122:(
98:?
84:)
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
