98:
269:
167:
176:
179:
Can an alt hook be proposed? The hook is kind of boring and you can see if in the picture. Some of the information in the article also appears unconnected "Marc also worked with
Vincent van Gogh." This connects to the painting how?
170:
New enough. Long enough. Image has an acceptable main page copyright that I verified by viewing the links related to it on the info page. Article is neutral enough. No plagiarism concerns. Sources support article
402:
135:
357:
Knowledge (XXG) does allow commercial sources. If there is anything that says
Knowledge (XXG) cannot have commercial sources, I would be extremely surprised.
330:
is commercial—its primary purpose is to sell painting reproductions, so there is no reason to trust the information imparted as these are not experts.
291:
How, may I ask? Go over every single reference, and explain how each of them is either "unreliable, commercial or self-published." Also, where in
36:
317:
Delighted to do so. The entirety of an article should be based on reliable sources, not merely one nugget of information (the hook).
17:
44:
372:
Commercial sources' primary purpose is to sell products, so they would not have a system of editorial oversight in place.
97:
362:
307:
257:
149:
65:
81:
319:
Criterion 4: "Nominations should be rejected if an inspection reveals that they are not based on reliable sources"
318:
358:
303:
253:
145:
61:
40:
185:
331:
181:
292:
327:
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
377:
347:
281:
234:
218:
205:
108:
326:
is a self-published website, absent any indication of editorial oversight or peer review.
296:
396:
323:
373:
343:
277:
117:
268:
166:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
243:
214:
175:
121:
339:
335:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
295:
does it not allow these type of sources? It only mentions having a
342:
that the author of this site is an expert on the subject.
250:, which was used to buy 60 artworks between 1942 and 1948?
273:
86:
276:
are either unreliable, commercial, or self-published.
124:, features bright, rich colours, and curved lines?
136:Template:Did you know nominations/Bared to You
8:
152:). Self nom at 22:24, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
49:No further edits should be made to this page
403:Failed DYK nominations from October 2012
7:
246:, was purchased with money from the
24:
45:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Did you know
18:Template:Did you know nominations
267:
174:
165:
96:
248:Gilbert M. Walker Memorial Fund
223:Gilbert M. Walker Memorial Fund
32:Please do not modify this page.
380:) 16:32, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
365:) 16:24, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
350:) 17:58, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
310:) 17:20, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
284:) 17:10, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
260:) 09:13, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
188:) 23:36, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
68:) 20:24, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
1:
221:in 1942 with money from the
37:this nomination's talk page
419:
334:is a user-generated wiki.
272:Refs 1, 4, 5, 7, and 9 in
217:, was purchased by the
41:the article's talk page
195:Removed that sentence.
302:. I've removed some.
144:Created/expanded by
300:to support the hook
338:is self-published—
359:Thine Antique Pen
304:Thine Antique Pen
254:Thine Antique Pen
235:Large Blue Horses
219:Walker Art Center
206:Large Blue Horses
153:
146:Thine Antique Pen
109:Large Blue Horses
73:Large Blue Horses
62:Thine Antique Pen
410:
271:
213:, a painting by
178:
169:
143:
100:
56:The result was:
34:
418:
417:
413:
412:
411:
409:
408:
407:
393:
392:
391:
322:
297:reliable source
196:
102:
93:
91:
87:Article history
75:
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
416:
414:
406:
405:
395:
394:
390:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
367:
366:
352:
351:
312:
311:
286:
285:
264:
263:
262:
261:
251:
226:
197:
190:
189:
172:
162:
161:
160:
159:
141:
140:
139:
138:
126:
125:
94:
90:
89:
84:
82:Back to T:TDYK
78:
76:
74:
71:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
415:
404:
401:
400:
398:
379:
375:
371:
370:
369:
368:
364:
360:
356:
355:
354:
353:
349:
345:
341:
340:no indication
337:
333:
329:
325:
320:
316:
315:
314:
313:
309:
305:
301:
298:
294:
290:
289:
288:
287:
283:
279:
275:
274:this revision
270:
266:
265:
259:
255:
252:
249:
245:
241:
238:
237:
236:
230:
227:
224:
220:
216:
212:
209:
208:
207:
201:
198:
194:
193:
192:
191:
187:
183:
177:
173:
168:
164:
163:
158:
157:
156:
155:
154:
151:
147:
137:
133:
130:
129:
128:
127:
123:
119:
115:
112:
111:
110:
104:
103:
101:
99:
88:
85:
83:
80:
79:
72:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
299:
247:
239:
233:
232:
228:
222:
210:
204:
203:
199:
142:
131:
118:oil painting
113:
107:
106:
95:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
244:Franz Marc
240:(pictured)
215:Franz Marc
211:(pictured)
122:Franz Marc
114:(pictured)
293:WP:WIADYK
231:... that
202:... that
182:LauraHale
105:... that
397:Category
132:Reviewed
58:rejected
374:Goodvac
344:Goodvac
324:Ref 1/9
278:Goodvac
336:Ref 7
332:Ref 5
328:Ref 4
229:ALT2:
200:ALT1:
171:text.
116:, an
16:<
378:talk
363:talk
348:talk
308:talk
282:talk
258:talk
186:talk
150:talk
66:talk
242:by
120:by
60:by
43:or
399::
180:--
134::
77:(
39:,
376:(
361:(
346:(
321:.
306:(
280:(
256:(
225:?
184:(
148:(
92:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
