323:
various occasions"; "She the only woman of her period to be given recognition publicly. Not only she was made a senior member of the omrah — the highest nobility, but also she was frequently consulted by the rulers of the state" vs "Chanda was the only woman of the period to be given recognition and made a senior member of the omrah, the highest nobility, and she was frequently consulted by the ruler on matters of state"; "Mah Laqa was a devout Muslim, she was influenced and exposed to understanding of Hindu epics and philosophy" vs "Chanda was a devout Muslim, but was influenced and exposed to an understanding of the great Hindu epics and philosophy".
98:
218:, and "the first woman poet of India to author a full collection of Urdu ghazals and whose anthology was ever published" in the article with "the first woman to author a full collection of Urdu ghazals" in the same source (though it isn't the one cited, it's needed to support the Urdu ghazals, even as the source cited covers the later publication info). Other sources should be checked for similar close paraphrasing.
210:
355:
173:
269:
Hello
Nikkimaria, thank you very much for taking time in checking the article for paraphrasing. As far as I know, I have removed any more hints of closeness from the above-referenced source. If you can help in identifying any more instances, then I'll appreciate that. Thank you once again! I wish you
213:
Review looks basically okay as far as it went, though the "funds" portion of the hook was not cited immediate after the relevant sentence in the article as it should have been; I fixed this issue by adding the needed citation. Unfortunately, there don't appear to have been checks for copyvio or close
322:
Nope, no scripts - there are some that exist, but they generally don't work on books, and in any case I prefer checking by hand. Here's what I still see as an issue: "she was not only awarded with jagirs and estates on various occasions" vs "she was awarded several honours with jagirs or estates on
306:
Hi
Nikkimaria, thank you for the reply. It may sound annoying, but I'm unable to identify sentences that seem to be problematic. Do you use a script or tool to check such things? If so, please let me know of it. I'll install it and check the areas myself. If you don't use a script, I request you to
237:
Dear BlueMoonset, thank you for taking a look at the nomination and the article with great depth. I have tried to address the copyvio concerns in the article. It was definitely not my intention, but it seemed to have just happened for a few phrases here and there. Hopefully the article will appear
253:
Hi
Mspraveen, BlueMoonset has asked me to have a look at this. Unfortunately I'm still seeing some closeness between the article and its source: for example, we have "Her adopted father saw to her education personally and that allowed her to have the best teachers available" vs "Her adopted
214:
paraphrasing. There are some issues in this regard. Compare, for instance, "clearing the area of debris and restored the buildings and their exquisite decorations" in the article with "cleared the area of debris and is restoring the buildings and their exquisite decorations" in
338:
Thanks a lot, Nikkimaria! I appreciate you picking out the sentences for me. I have rewritten them to the best of my abilities. Can you check once again (hopefully a last time for both of us :))?
184:
3. Cites sources with inline citations and all images are from commons. A bit flattering toward the subject, but that is based on the references cited and far from a breach of neutrality.
97:
176:
1. The article's prose portion has been expanded from 462 characters to 3,008 (not including a long quote; with it, it would become over 3,500) on 19 September, therefore eligible.
388:
147:
129:
285:
Hi
Mspraveen. I've checked the other sources and they're now fine, it's just footnote 2 that's still at issue here. Could you do a bit more rewriting of that material?
254:
father...saw to her education personally and she had the best teachers available". Some other phrases from that source also need rewording.
36:
215:
17:
44:
81:
223:
198:
65:
363:
328:
290:
259:
343:
312:
275:
243:
193:(I am a new reviewer, so all editors may add a second opinion. However, article seems fine to me).
161:
115:
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
40:
219:
194:
133:
61:
359:
324:
286:
255:
339:
308:
271:
239:
157:
382:
118:
209:
107:
307:
identify the sentences that seem to be a problem. I'll appreciate your guidance.
238:
fine in its current form now. Please raise any other concerns that one may have.
354:
172:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
125:
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
121:
190:
5. Editor who expanded the article has reviewed other DYK's.
187:
4. Hook is well cited and conforms to format guidelines.
86:
164:). Self nom at 04:57, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
128:, was renovated in 2011 using funds from the
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
389:Passed DYK nominations from September 2012
181:2. Article is therefore sufficiently long.
130:Consulate General of the United States
358:Yep, looks like it's now good to go.
7:
24:
18:Template:Did you know nominations
353:
278:) 09:36, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
262:) 18:23, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
246:) 16:06, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
226:) 21:47, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
208:
201:) 05:51, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
171:
96:
105:... that the two centuries-old
32:Please do not modify this page.
1:
366:) 17:30, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
346:) 15:42, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
331:) 12:35, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
315:) 10:22, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
293:) 15:08, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
68:) 22:43, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
405:
41:the article's talk page
156:Created/expanded by
108:tomb of Mah Laqa Bai
165:
396:
357:
270:a nice weekend.
212:
175:
155:
100:
60:by —
56:The result was:
34:
404:
403:
399:
398:
397:
395:
394:
393:
379:
378:
377:
148:Jacob, the Liar
102:
93:
91:
87:Article history
75:
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
402:
400:
392:
391:
381:
380:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
348:
347:
333:
332:
317:
316:
303:
302:
301:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
280:
279:
264:
263:
248:
247:
230:
229:
228:
227:
203:
202:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
178:
177:
153:
152:
151:
150:
138:
137:
94:
90:
89:
84:
82:Back to T:TDYK
78:
76:
74:
71:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
401:
390:
387:
386:
384:
365:
361:
356:
352:
351:
350:
349:
345:
341:
337:
336:
335:
334:
330:
326:
321:
320:
319:
318:
314:
310:
305:
304:
292:
288:
284:
283:
282:
281:
277:
273:
268:
267:
266:
265:
261:
257:
252:
251:
250:
249:
245:
241:
236:
235:
234:
233:
232:
231:
225:
221:
217:
211:
207:
206:
205:
204:
200:
196:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
174:
170:
169:
168:
167:
166:
163:
159:
149:
145:
142:
141:
140:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
120:
117:
113:
110:
109:
104:
103:
101:
99:
88:
85:
83:
80:
79:
72:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
154:
143:
111:
106:
95:
73:Mah Laqa Bai
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
220:BlueMoonset
216:this source
195:Bahavd Gita
62:Crisco 1492
360:Nikkimaria
325:Nikkimaria
287:Nikkimaria
256:Nikkimaria
112:(pictured)
340:Mspraveen
309:Mspraveen
272:Mspraveen
240:Mspraveen
158:Mspraveen
134:Hyderabad
126:courtesan
116:Nizam era
383:Category
144:Reviewed
58:promoted
122:poetess
16:<
364:talk
344:talk
329:talk
313:talk
291:talk
276:talk
260:talk
244:talk
224:talk
199:talk
162:talk
124:and
119:Urdu
114:, a
66:talk
132:in
43:or
385::
146::
77:(
39:,
362:(
342:(
327:(
311:(
289:(
274:(
258:(
242:(
222:(
197:(
160:(
136:?
92:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
