Knowledge

Template:Did you know nominations/Muggeseggele

Source 📝

480: 234: 158: 274: 609: 541: 508: 321: 483:
Need an independent reviewer to do a full review of the nomination—should probably take a look at the merger discussion on the article's talk page—including the ALT hook (have struck all hooks but the one that was originally in prep before the AfD began).
406:
I would llike to aopolgize for not being as familiar with DYK and discussion habits as I should be probably. I however have the impression, that if you provide sources in german, it is handled as if they would not exist here. Thats sometimes annoying.
511:
I've made some copyedits, as have some friendly souls, but the article is still far from well-written. It's a lot of small things (incorrect punctuation, for instance) as well as bigger things--infelicitous grammar, word choice.
527:
I wont do that myself, as I am the person responsible for the grammar mostly. But I asked Yngva to have a second look and she brushed it up. I hope get some further helping hands but it looks better in my eyes now. Cheers
256:
I added some text and erased the UD reference. The funny aspect of the first hook seems to be lost in translation. Muggaseggele is an idiom, no one expect to have an exact length being measured. Cheers
279:"that according to Swabian author Henning Petershagen, an entomologist of the Naturkundemuseum in Stuttgart, measured average lengths of 0.22 millimetres (0.0087 in) for a Muggeseggele (pictured)? 578:"Unit of measurement" implies that things are actually measured in Muggeseggeles, e.g. "this filament is only 20 Muggesegeles in length." Actually the word seems to be used like English idioms 91: 422:
I don't think the claims being made are sufficient to establish notability. For example, even though I could find thousands of dictionaries with the word "the", and probably thousands of
612:
Pass it on with ALT2; thanks Prioryman. (BTW, sorry this took so long--I didn't know another reviewer had come along. I came across the article by accident and made a few more tweaks.)
324:
Rjanag placed a "merge" template on the article. Accordingly, I'm pulling it from the prep area until the situation is more settled. Here's the hook wording that was in the prep area:
237:
The character amount is only 990 characters and it needs to be at least 1,500 characters. Urban Dictionary is not a reliable source. The hook doesn't make any sense.
632: 170: 86: 544:
The article is much better now, so I think it passes on the usual grounds of newness, length and sourcing, but really, the hook is boring. The concept of
426:, I still would not claim that the number of sources makes the word "the" notable. In short: whether your sources are written in German or English has 381:
that there isn't a discussion happening. DYK has rules expressing that nominations don't get passed while there is a discussion like this ongoing; you
36: 296:
Thanks, thats been quick. The deWP article was under threat of erasure and is now as well on DYK in german. The sources are the same.
17: 430:
on the points that I was making, I never suggested that it did, and you don't need to keep trying to change the subject like this.
432: 387: 192:... that according Swabian entrepreneuer Thomas Lindner, at the Indian premises of his company everybody knows what a 44: 141: 418:
I never acted as if the sources don't exist. As I have already articulated multiple times at the discussion page,
81: 157: 111: 489: 116: 553: 29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
101: 40: 617: 533: 517: 500: 485: 464: 441: 412: 396: 385:
keep trying to pretend there is not a discussion just because you don't agree with merging.
358: 347: 301: 262: 221: 549: 479: 377:
Serten: as I have explained multiple times, the fact that you don't agree with merging
286: 242: 423: 626: 96: 233: 594: 565: 495:
Well, this could be a lot of fun--but the article needs to be seriously Englished.
338: 194: 179: 166: 273: 613: 529: 513: 496: 460: 408: 354: 343: 297: 258: 217: 62: 608: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
540: 507: 320: 282: 238: 174: 121: 47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. 570: 459:
The afdelete discussion is over, can we close the afmerger as well?
177:
measured average lengths of 0.22 millimetres (0.0087 in) for a
548:
isn't explained at all. I'd suggest the following alternative.
277:
My issue with the hook was that there was no needed commas -
165:... that according to Swabian author Henning Petershagen an 342:
has been measured as 0.22 millimetres (0.0087 in)?--
146: 106: 598:
is an idiomatic expression for a very short length?
224:). Self nominated at 16:19, 25 June 2013 (UTC) 8: 49:No further edits should be made to this page 69: 420:regardless of how many sources there are 281:I assume good faith on the references. 72: 633:Passed DYK nominations from June 2013 353:Think a merger is out of discussion. 7: 424:articles and blogs talking about it 66:  11:08, 28 August 2013 (UTC) 24: 336:... that the average length of a 18:Template:Did you know nominations 607: 595:the length of a housefly's penis 566:the length of a housefly's penis 539: 506: 478: 319: 272: 232: 156: 32:Please do not modify this page. 556:) 22:30, 19 August 2013 (UTC) 536:) 19:31, 18 August 2013 (UTC) 1: 620:) 01:24, 28 August 2013 (UTC) 520:) 19:17, 18 August 2013 (UTC) 503:) 21:00, 13 August 2013 (UTC) 492:) 20:59, 12 August 2013 (UTC) 569:is a unit of measurement in 431: 386: 350:) 14:03, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 467:) 22:45, 22 July 2013 (UTC) 415:) 18:35, 1 July 2013 (UTC) 361:) 21:25, 29 June 2013 (UTC) 304:) 02:40, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 289:) 19:09, 26 June 2013 (UTC) 265:) 17:37, 26 June 2013 (UTC) 245:) 06:40, 26 June 2013 (UTC) 45:Knowledge talk:Did you know 37:this nomination's talk page 649: 444:) 02:48, 2 July 2013 (UTC) 399:) 15:44, 1 July 2013 (UTC) 374:The article is now at AFD. 117:Find sources (notability) 92:Earwig's Copyvio Detector 41:the article's talk page 107:A Simple Word Counter 87:Reviewer instructions 216:Created/expanded by 592:... that in Swabia 112:Reviewers' template 580:smidgen, mite, bit 225: 130: 129: 640: 611: 543: 510: 482: 436: 391: 323: 276: 236: 215: 171:Naturkundemuseum 160: 70: 56:The result was: 34: 648: 647: 643: 642: 641: 639: 638: 637: 623: 622: 621: 434: 389: 162: 153: 151: 147:Article history 135: 126: 102:Character count 67: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 646: 644: 636: 635: 625: 624: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 576: 575: 574: 522: 521: 504: 493: 475: 474: 473: 472: 471: 470: 469: 468: 450: 449: 448: 447: 446: 445: 401: 400: 375: 371: 370: 369: 368: 367: 366: 365: 364: 363: 362: 326: 325: 314: 313: 312: 311: 310: 309: 308: 307: 306: 305: 291: 290: 267: 266: 249: 248: 247: 246: 213: 212: 211: 210: 205: 204: 188: 187: 154: 150: 149: 144: 142:Back to T:TDYK 138: 136: 134: 131: 128: 127: 125: 124: 119: 114: 109: 104: 99: 94: 89: 84: 78: 75: 74: 54: 53: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 645: 634: 631: 630: 628: 619: 615: 610: 597: 596: 591: 588: 587: 585: 581: 577: 573: 572: 568: 567: 562: 558: 557: 555: 551: 547: 542: 538: 537: 535: 531: 526: 525: 524: 523: 519: 515: 509: 505: 502: 498: 494: 491: 487: 481: 477: 476: 466: 462: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 453: 452: 451: 443: 439: 438: 429: 425: 421: 417: 416: 414: 410: 405: 404: 403: 402: 398: 394: 393: 384: 380: 379:does not mean 376: 373: 372: 360: 356: 352: 351: 349: 345: 341: 340: 335: 332: 331: 330: 329: 328: 327: 322: 318: 317: 316: 315: 303: 299: 295: 294: 293: 292: 288: 284: 280: 275: 271: 270: 269: 268: 264: 260: 255: 254: 253: 252: 251: 250: 244: 240: 235: 231: 230: 229: 228: 227: 223: 219: 209: 208: 207: 206: 203: 201: 197: 196: 190: 189: 185: 182: 181: 176: 172: 168: 164: 163: 161: 159: 148: 145: 143: 140: 139: 132: 123: 120: 118: 115: 113: 110: 108: 105: 103: 100: 98: 95: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 79: 77: 76: 71: 68: 65: 64: 59: 52: 50: 46: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 593: 589: 583: 582:, or German 579: 564: 560: 559: 546:Muggeseggele 545: 427: 419: 382: 378: 339:muggeseggele 337: 333: 278: 214: 199: 195:Muggeseggele 193: 191: 183: 180:Muggeseggele 178: 167:entomologist 155: 133:Muggeseggele 61: 57: 55: 48: 31: 28: 486:BlueMoonset 122:Hook length 73:DYK toolbox 428:no bearing 200:(pictured) 184:(pictured) 563:... that 550:Prioryman 175:Stuttgart 97:QPQ check 82:DYK check 627:Category 584:Bisschen 58:promoted 440: ( 395: ( 169:of the 614:Drmies 571:Swabia 530:Serten 514:Drmies 497:Drmies 461:Serten 409:Serten 383:cannot 355:Serten 344:Orlady 298:Serten 259:Serten 218:Serten 63:Allen3 590:ALT2: 561:ALT1: 16:< 618:talk 554:talk 534:talk 518:talk 501:talk 490:talk 465:talk 442:talk 437:anaɢ 413:talk 397:talk 392:anaɢ 359:talk 348:talk 302:talk 287:talk 283:SL93 263:talk 243:talk 239:SL93 222:talk 334:ALT 198:is 173:in 60:by 43:or 629:: 586:. 226:. 137:( 39:, 616:( 552:( 532:( 516:( 499:( 488:( 463:( 435:ʨ 433:r 411:( 390:ʨ 388:r 357:( 346:( 300:( 285:( 261:( 241:( 220:( 202:? 186:? 152:) 51:.

Index

Template:Did you know nominations
this nomination's talk page
the article's talk page
Knowledge talk:Did you know
Allen3
DYK check
Reviewer instructions
Earwig's Copyvio Detector
QPQ check
Character count
A Simple Word Counter
Reviewers' template
Find sources (notability)
Hook length
Back to T:TDYK
Article history
Muggeseggele in action
entomologist
Naturkundemuseum
Stuttgart
Muggeseggele
Muggeseggele
Serten
talk

SL93
talk
Serten
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.