243:
222:
429:
341:
191:
320:
544:
351:
671:--it's just a matter of what level of granularity you choose to look at). But just saying "it is a notable topic" does not make it notable. I gave multiple reasons above why I do not think the article meets Knowledge's notability guidelines. Do you have a substantive explanation for why you think the article, or substantive responses to my points? Or are you just going to say "it
489:
461:
1303:) is more confusing than enlightning. He tracks the word "Sack" from the Latin Word "saccus" to the Greek Word "sákkos" to the Assyric Word "šakku". When he links to the word "penis", he says himself that the link is "strange" (german "seltsam"). But to be honest i don't see a valid link between "seggele" and "penis" in his analysis. --
981:
1274:. It is (on one side) hard scientific evidence combined with "metaphoric term" - like the guy who calculated the speed of Santa Claus in a quasi scientific paper. It is a scientific joke ment to amuse but not ment to be taken literally. The same fith the fly/mosquito/scrotum/penis. It - does - not - matter.
1416:
A naive reader stumbling on this article struggles to quickly comprehend the lede. Is this about some fictional trivia? In what senses is this article about something real? Improving the lede would not be easy -- to quickly cue browsers that this is a serious article about something real, but that is
579:
Etymology, paragraph 3: Discussion of how the word is a rare example of a certain kind of swearing. This kind of contributes to notability, although really what is suggests is this would be more appropriate as a single point in an article about German profanity (no such article exists yet, although
643:
It is a notable topic and it cannot be merged with German profanity, as it is a dialect (swabian) expression. It would not be understood in
Hamburg, but as said in some partsof asia under swabian control ;) I understood you doubt the sourcing of notability. Please not that there is a multitude of
996:
This article is truely written in the style of an encyclopedia and does not fit into a dictionary at all. The closest
English term is "gnat's cock" or a "gnat's dick". Although it is possible to measure the diameter of this organ of a gnat, nobody would assume that this term is used as a precise
666:
Serten: I accept that there may be issues with merging this with other German expressions (although whether or not a
Swabian expression should go in an article about German is a matter for debate; Swabian and standard German are not mutually intelligible, but they are still part of
883:
a measurement unit, it's just a figure of speech. The article leads me to believe that no one actually measures things with this unit (i.e., no one says "this is four muggeseggeles long). Figures of speech belong in a dictionary, not
Knowledge, unless they can be shown to be
575:
Etymology, paragraph 2: Average length of fly penises. Actually not even really germane to this article (which is about an expression, not about actual fly penises), although if it is germane then it's just more of the definition, not something contributing to
564:, how is this entry notable? Notability for an entry on a word or expression depends on establishing the real-world significance of that expression, not just describing its etymology. If I go through this article paragraph by paragraph, here's what we have:
1300:
1107:
1612:"the standard German Säckel, meaning little sack". "Säckel" is not the standard german word for a little sack, this would be "Säckchen". "Säckel" is used in southern german dialects. I'm from Berlin and I have never heard the word "Säckel" here. ;)
568:
Lede: A dictionary definition, and an unsourced claim about how iconic and popular the expression is. The latter might be evidence of notability if it were backed up in any way, but it is neither sourced nor elaborated upon in the rest of the
580:
similar articles for other languages do; it would be straightforward to make a stub) rather than as a stand-alone article. On a side note, the point about Alan Dundes is totally lost on most readers, because it does not bother to say
1247:
As said, one should try to read and understand Gauger - which is quit clear about the etymology. It clearly states that muggeseggele is the equivalent of a penis. Please undo your revert and ignor POV / OR. Btw
Geezers translation
895:
Regarding Dundes: this has no bearing on the notability issue, I was just making a suggestion about how to improve poor writing. I am glad you have improved this, but as I said above it's a "side note" and does not solve the main
678:
Also, I did not ask for more elaboration about who
Lindner is--in fact, I said in my message above that that paragraph was already too wordy. The fact that a famous person mentioned this word does not immediately make it notable.
1512:
899:
Regarding the quote about people who recognize this phrase: the fact that the quote comes from a famous person does not make the word inherently notable. Again, please review the guidelines on notability. As I mentioned above,
851:
Result - The article is noteable, a merger is neither useful nor founded. The peculiarities of the topic) and the status as a popular icon is being described and sourced. PLease erase the merge request on short notice.
997:
dimension such as a millimetre. However, some
Suebians believe, that a previously vague unit equals now the average length of 0.22 millimetres. If one follows your request for deletion, you would need to delete also
1502:
153:
617:
For what it's worth, the writing of the article also has some issues; there are some very wordy places where wordiness was clearly used to pad the character count to get it past the 1500 characters needed for
867:
Your additions are an improvement, but I still do not believe my concerns have been addressed. Regarding your first point, etymology is not inherently notable just because it's etymology; please review
1513:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130927133628/http://content.stuttgarter-nachrichten.de/stn/page/1968288_0_9223_schoenstes-schwaebisches-wort-grosser-vorsprung-fuer-schwabens-kleinste-einheit.html
820:
The quote is from the CEO of the world market leader of textile needles and Süddeutsche is a German bavarian newspaper. To get quoted there shows the iconic status and that is highly noteable.
1226:
seggl (NOT Muggeseggele) and (2) Qualitätstechnik (quality technology) - get it? gnat's dick = quality technology. This is BRUHAHA-humor - or "overinterpretation". M. is used for length,
1516:
1252:
is a quite suitable one, since that indicates and signifies a scottish background - similar as
Muggeseggele is an indicator of adeherence or origin to a regional (Swabian) background.
795:. There are four sources for notability in the lede. I elaborated on the content of those sources a wee bit just to show that Muggeseggele is a notable example and has iconic value.
587:
Etymology, paragraph 4: mention that people in some place know what this word is. Not really a strong argument for notability. For comparison: in
English, we have people who have
1506:
933:
This is about a figure of speech measurement unit, right. However it can be actually measured and has been, to the amusement and interest of various sources. Lets compare it to
1503:
https://archive.is/20130624035735/http://content.stuttgarter-zeitung.de/stz/page/1864143_0_6028_--schwaebisch-fuer-reigschmeckte-was-ist-denn-bitte-schoen-ein-muggaseggel-.html
147:
1698:
1673:
302:
292:
1554:
1550:
1536:
536:
1357:
before they used microscopes, and they just didn't know that a fly has no scrotum. If they wanted to refer explcitely to the scrotum they could have called it
1678:
1668:
960:
471:
1385:
644:
sources given for that. I elaborated a little more on
Lindner. Its an serious entrepreneur, speaker of VDMA and him being quoted with the expression in
79:
1517:
http://content.stuttgarter-nachrichten.de/stn/page/1968288_0_9223_schoenstes-schwaebisches-wort-grosser-vorsprung-fuer-schwabens-kleinste-einheit.html
1703:
1688:
407:
397:
532:
1507:
http://content.stuttgarter-zeitung.de/stz/page/1864143_0_6028_--schwaebisch-fuer-reigschmeckte-was-ist-denn-bitte-schoen-ein-muggaseggel-.html
907:
Finally, as a participant in this discussion, you are in no position to unilaterally decide the "result" of the discussion. I will file for a
1693:
1683:
1632:
1522:
85:
1418:
263:
250:
227:
44:
1613:
373:
1234:"a weeeee bit", it sounds funny, it alludes to sex, its etymology is shady and its entomology doubtful - nothing less, nothing more.
1532:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
683:, who is more famous, made a more famous statement about the word "is" once, but we don't have an article about that word either.
606:
to an article on German profanity, but none exists right now. The best alternative might be to create a stub out of the pages in
901:
588:
99:
30:
818:
Etymology, paragraph 4: mention that people in some place know what this word is. Not really a strong argument for notability.
104:
20:
168:
1005:. Could it be that the slightly embarrasing function of this body part is the real reason for requesting its deletion? --
364:
325:
268:
74:
135:
1597:
913:
765:
735:
685:
624:
202:
65:
1438:
to "help cue reader to humorous context" handle that nicely. Currently the lede begins (I've bolded your additions):
1647:
831:
There's no strings upon this article of mine, it was always Muggeseggele from the start - would u suggest to merge
572:
Etymology, paragraph 1: Just etymology. Doesn't contribute to notability; all words and expressions have etymology.
968:
607:
467:
1553:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1422:
1137:
242:
221:
190:
129:
1218:
is a joke (in the sense of the word) which is not - voluntarily or unvoluntarily - understood by the author (
1617:
1588:
1494:
1374:
1042:
1010:
720:
109:
1523:
https://web.archive.org/web/20150603160604/http://www.kindernetz.de/barz/infos/lexikon/-/id=64520/1navg22/
1490:
1401:
1308:
1191:
1169:
1127:
1082:
934:
879:
Regarding your second point: based on my understanding of the article as it is written, a muggeseggele is
645:
125:
1641:
1572:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1560:
668:
504:
435:
208:
1493:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
826:
is a redirect, I would assume it as being noteable for itself, since its being used in German as well.
964:
902:
the word "potato" has been used by two famous performers to describe a difference in English dialects
460:
175:
1200:
Gauger is the vailid source here and clearly states its about the penis. Please undoi your revert.
592:
161:
55:
1526:
428:
372:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1370:
1038:
1006:
716:
712:
708:
70:
1557:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
811:
This is about a measurement unit. Insofar actual measurements by serious scientists ARE noteable
488:
1573:
904:, but that does not make the word "potato" notable (as opposed to the objects called potatoes).
1397:
1304:
1187:
1165:
1123:
1078:
51:
1288:
1467:
1257:
1205:
1096:
1025:
942:
922:
857:
841:
774:
744:
694:
653:
633:
1580:
1227:
141:
1539:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1353:
and this is rather confusing indeed. It might well be, that the Suabians used the word
1266:
I explained in detail (elswhere) that what was named and measured and what is shown in
760:
356:
255:
1579:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1662:
873:
619:
561:
259:
1144:) but later is more specific calling it a "Mückensäckchen". And a "säckchen" is the
1636:
1486:
956:
908:
832:
823:
680:
524:
24:
602:
In short, I am not really convinced that this is a notable topic. I would suggest
1119:
1066:
827:
1546:
1463:
1296:
1253:
1201:
1092:
1021:
1002:
938:
885:
869:
853:
837:
649:
509:
1545:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1393:
1145:
733:
the article shouldn't be merged, instead of just saying so as if it's a fact?
346:
340:
319:
262:. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at
707:
The article should not be merged with German profanity. It might be moved to
1292:
1141:
499:
1267:
1219:
1186:
like the humans have, that is the "ironic/funny" part of the expression. --
1070:
1111:
611:
1230:, it is used for Volume and M. is used for time. A hell of a unit... It
447:
1183:
1161:
1074:
1055:
369:
1179:
1037:
this stand-alone article is best kept separate from anything else. --
759:
Everyone: note that another place this content could be merged to is
519:
1654:
1621:
1602:
1471:
1426:
1405:
1378:
1325:
1312:
1282:
1261:
1242:
1209:
1195:
1173:
1131:
1100:
1086:
1046:
1029:
1014:
972:
946:
926:
861:
845:
778:
748:
724:
698:
657:
637:
254:, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to
1115:
1059:
989:
1149:
1527:
http://www.kindernetz.de/barz/infos/lexikon/-/id=64520/1navg22/
1435:
the changes you made on the same day as your comment just above
1157:
1153:
998:
985:
980:
483:
455:
423:
184:
15:
1639:, See former article's history for a list of contributors.
1384:
There was already a Discussion in the German Knowledge about
1106:
First: I am german and i live in that area. Not even in the
542:
715:, if someone does a bit of research on these two lemmas. --
1497:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
439:
1122:
is a "cubic" measurement, not a "length" measurement. --
1434:
598:
Paragraph on English equivalent: just dictionary stuff
589:
used "potato" as an example of something sociocultural
535:. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
434:
This article was edited to contain a total or partial
160:
1453:
Alemannic German idiom used in Swabia to designate a
1214:
This whole thing with penis/scrotum/fly/mosquito and
1417:
basically a long-established local cultural joke...-
368:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1549:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
937:- its a parody, but ist has been technically done.
528:
is an idiomatic expression for a very short length?
992:, later replaced by the cloth-ell or 'double ell'.
835:into Elvis Presley just to have one article less?
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1369:show that the meaning is not literal at all. --
1535:This message was posted before February 2018.
537:Template:Did you know nominations/Muggeseggele
1396:and means "less than the width of a hair". --
443:
174:
8:
1291:in the german wikipedia. Basically he was a
888:by means of substantial coverage (not just
188:
648:alone renders notability out of question.
314:
216:
1485:I have just modified 3 external links on
1182:know that the fly does not really have a
512:). The text of the entry was as follows:
979:
610:and include this. Of course, merging to
316:
218:
1699:Pages translated from German Knowledge
1674:Low-importance Animal anatomy articles
1462:I'd say you've provided cue enough. --
533:Knowledge:Recent additions/2013/August
1633:List of humorous units of measurement
531:A record of the entry may be seen at
7:
1140:which says first "Geschlechtsteil" (
470:on 1 July 2013 (UTC). The result of
362:This article is within the scope of
277:Knowledge:WikiProject Animal anatomy
1679:WikiProject Animal anatomy articles
1669:Start-Class Animal anatomy articles
1317:Thanks for looking at the details!
280:Template:WikiProject Animal anatomy
207:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
804:Thats the title. The etymology is
14:
1489:. Please take a moment to review
1152:, which is translated to english
1073:, which translated to english is
1020:Can we erase the merger request?
543:
266:. This project is an offshoot of
1631:Text and references copied from
870:Knowledge's policy on notability
525:the length of a housefly's penis
487:
459:
427:
349:
339:
318:
241:
220:
189:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1704:Knowledge Did you know articles
1689:Low-importance Germany articles
1091:Nope. Wrong track, see gauger.
892:) in multiple reliable sources.
814:Dundes and so on was clarified.
591:, but we don't have an article
466:This article was nominated for
402:This article has been rated as
297:This article has been rated as
1299:. What he writes in his book (
1:
1655:15:56, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
562:Knowledge is not a dictionary
450:to see a list of its authors.
382:Knowledge:WikiProject Germany
376:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
1694:WikiProject Germany articles
1684:Start-Class Germany articles
1603:14:34, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
1427:19:39, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
1228:M. is used for salt (weight)
912:
764:
734:
684:
623:
584:claim is being contradicted.
448:history of the original page
385:Template:WikiProject Germany
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1720:
1566:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1482:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1406:15:16, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
508:column on 31 August 2013 (
408:project's importance scale
303:project's importance scale
264:WikiProject Animal anatomy
251:WikiProject Animal anatomy
1622:17:55, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
1472:18:34, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
1388:. There it was said that
1379:13:29, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
1326:12:04, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
1313:11:18, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
1287:There is a article about
1283:08:22, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
1262:19:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
1243:14:41, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
1210:19:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
1196:06:55, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
1174:06:40, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
1132:06:32, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
1101:06:19, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
1087:06:18, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
1047:21:34, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
1030:17:31, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
927:13:21, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
862:09:28, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
846:07:04, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
779:18:17, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
749:18:15, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
725:17:48, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
699:18:15, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
658:17:27, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
638:13:07, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
614:could be another option.
608:Category:German profanity
401:
334:
296:
236:
215:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1110:i can find that it is a
1015:17:59, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
973:13:46, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
947:05:50, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
498:appeared on Knowledge's
248:This article is part of
1478:External links modified
1178:And yes, the people in
1138:schwaebische dictionary
1065:See the german article
791:This is an example for
283:Animal anatomy articles
1412:lede needs improvement
1367:um Mückenpimmelsbreite
1164:, not the penis !!! --
993:
935:IP over Avian Carriers
729:Would you care to say
548:
197:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
1289:de:Hans-Martin Gauger
983:
560:Keeping in mind that
546:
100:Neutral point of view
1547:regular verification
1457:very small length...
1349:what Prussians call
1069:. It CLEARLY states
955:I removed this from
808:and insofar noteable
105:No original research
1537:After February 2018
1390:Mückenpimmelsbreite
1345:The Bavarians call
874:regarding etymology
646:Süddeutsche Zeitung
365:WikiProject Germany
269:WikiProject Animals
1591:InternetArchiveBot
1542:InternetArchiveBot
994:
549:
203:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
1567:
1322:
1279:
1239:
988:was originally a
959:and posted it at
836:
793:Swabian profanity
553:
552:
482:
481:
454:
453:
422:
421:
418:
417:
414:
413:
313:
312:
309:
308:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1711:
1653:
1643:7&6=thirteen
1608:Standard German?
1601:
1592:
1565:
1564:
1543:
1437:
1324:
1320:
1281:
1277:
1270:is not the same
1241:
1237:
917:
830:
769:
739:
689:
628:
545:
491:
484:
463:
456:
444:German Knowledge
431:
424:
390:
389:
388:Germany articles
386:
383:
380:
359:
354:
353:
352:
343:
336:
335:
330:
322:
315:
285:
284:
281:
278:
275:
245:
238:
237:
232:
224:
217:
200:
194:
193:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1719:
1718:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1659:
1658:
1640:
1629:
1610:
1595:
1590:
1558:
1551:have permission
1541:
1495:this simple FaQ
1480:
1433:
1414:
1318:
1275:
1268:the "data sheet
1235:
1120:de:Muggeseggele
1067:de:Muggeseggele
1063:
965:ReformedArsenal
915:
828:de:Couch-Potato
767:
737:
687:
626:
558:
387:
384:
381:
378:
377:
355:
350:
348:
328:
282:
279:
276:
273:
272:
230:
201:on Knowledge's
198:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1717:
1715:
1707:
1706:
1701:
1696:
1691:
1686:
1681:
1676:
1671:
1661:
1660:
1628:
1625:
1609:
1606:
1585:
1584:
1577:
1530:
1529:
1521:Added archive
1519:
1511:Added archive
1509:
1501:Added archive
1479:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1419:71.174.175.150
1413:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1245:
1118:. And anyway:
1062:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
978:
977:
976:
975:
950:
949:
930:
929:
905:
897:
893:
877:
849:
848:
821:
815:
812:
809:
801:
800:
799:
798:
797:
796:
784:
783:
782:
781:
761:Swabian German
754:
753:
752:
751:
704:
703:
702:
701:
676:
661:
660:
600:
599:
596:
585:
577:
573:
570:
557:
554:
551:
550:
540:
530:
529:
492:
480:
479:
472:the discussion
464:
452:
451:
446:. Consult the
432:
420:
419:
416:
415:
412:
411:
404:Low-importance
400:
394:
393:
391:
374:the discussion
361:
360:
357:Germany portal
344:
332:
331:
329:Low‑importance
323:
311:
310:
307:
306:
299:Low-importance
295:
289:
288:
286:
274:Animal anatomy
256:animal anatomy
246:
234:
233:
231:Low‑importance
228:Animal anatomy
225:
213:
212:
206:
195:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1716:
1705:
1702:
1700:
1697:
1695:
1692:
1690:
1687:
1685:
1682:
1680:
1677:
1675:
1672:
1670:
1667:
1666:
1664:
1657:
1656:
1651:
1650:
1645:
1644:
1638:
1634:
1626:
1624:
1623:
1619:
1615:
1607:
1605:
1604:
1599:
1594:
1593:
1582:
1578:
1575:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1562:
1556:
1552:
1548:
1544:
1538:
1533:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1483:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1439:
1436:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1411:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1371:NearEMPTiness
1368:
1365:. Words like
1364:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1327:
1323:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1310:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1280:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1251:
1246:
1244:
1240:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1222:says (1) Mugg
1221:
1217:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1146:en:Diminutive
1143:
1139:
1136:See also the
1135:
1134:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1089:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1061:
1057:
1054:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1039:NearEMPTiness
1036:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1007:NearEMPTiness
1004:
1000:
991:
987:
982:
974:
970:
966:
962:
958:
954:
953:
952:
951:
948:
944:
940:
936:
932:
931:
928:
924:
920:
919:
910:
909:third opinion
906:
903:
898:
894:
891:
887:
882:
878:
875:
871:
866:
865:
864:
863:
859:
855:
847:
843:
839:
834:
829:
825:
822:
819:
816:
813:
810:
807:
803:
802:
794:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
785:
780:
776:
772:
771:
762:
758:
757:
756:
755:
750:
746:
742:
741:
732:
728:
727:
726:
722:
718:
717:NearEMPTiness
714:
710:
706:
705:
700:
696:
692:
691:
682:
677:
674:
670:
665:
664:
663:
662:
659:
655:
651:
647:
642:
641:
640:
639:
635:
631:
630:
621:
615:
613:
609:
605:
597:
594:
593:Potato (word)
590:
586:
583:
578:
574:
571:
567:
566:
565:
563:
555:
541:
538:
534:
527:
526:
521:
517:
514:
513:
511:
507:
506:
501:
497:
493:
490:
486:
485:
477:
473:
469:
465:
462:
458:
457:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
430:
426:
425:
409:
405:
399:
396:
395:
392:
375:
371:
367:
366:
358:
347:
345:
342:
338:
337:
333:
327:
324:
321:
317:
304:
300:
294:
291:
290:
287:
271:
270:
265:
261:
260:human anatomy
257:
253:
252:
247:
244:
240:
239:
235:
229:
226:
223:
219:
214:
210:
204:
196:
192:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1648:
1642:
1637:Muggeseggele
1630:
1614:62.199.49.10
1611:
1589:
1586:
1561:source check
1540:
1534:
1531:
1487:Muggeseggele
1484:
1481:
1454:
1450:
1447:Muckenseckel
1446:
1443:Muggeseggele
1442:
1415:
1398:Agatha Bauer
1394:Plattdeutsch
1389:
1366:
1362:
1359:Muggabeitele
1358:
1354:
1350:
1346:
1344:
1319:
1305:Agatha Bauer
1276:
1271:
1249:
1236:
1231:
1223:
1215:
1188:Agatha Bauer
1166:Agatha Bauer
1142:en:Sex organ
1124:Agatha Bauer
1090:
1079:Agatha Bauer
1071:de:Hodensack
1064:
1034:
995:
889:
880:
850:
833:Wooden Heart
824:Couch Potato
817:
805:
792:
730:
681:Bill Clinton
672:
616:
603:
601:
581:
559:
523:
518:... that in
516:Did you know
515:
505:Did you know
503:
496:Muggeseggele
495:
494:A fact from
476:no consensus
475:
440:Muggeseggele
403:
363:
298:
267:
249:
209:WikiProjects
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
25:Muggeseggele
19:This is the
1627:Attribution
1455:nonspecific
1363:Bocksbeutel
1361:similar to
1355:Muggaseggle
1297:Linguistics
1003:Foot (unit)
713:gnat's dick
709:gnat's cock
669:High German
576:notability.
556:Notability?
510:check views
436:translation
258:apart from
199:Start-class
148:free images
31:not a forum
1663:Categories
1598:Report bug
1184:en:Scrotum
1162:en:Scrotum
1156:. So this
1075:en:Scrotum
1581:this tool
1574:this tool
1293:Professor
1250:a wee bit
1220:this Link
1108:reference
675:notable"?
547:Knowledge
500:Main Page
442:from the
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1587:Cheers.—
1451:humorous
1112:aedeagus
896:problem.
612:aedeagus
569:article.
468:deletion
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1491:my edit
1150:de:Sack
1056:scrotum
890:mention
886:notable
806:special
604:merging
502:in the
406:on the
379:Germany
370:Germany
326:Germany
301:on the
154:WP refs
142:scholar
1464:Thnidu
1321:GEEZER
1278:GEEZER
1254:Serten
1238:GEEZER
1202:Serten
1180:Swabia
1158:en:bag
1154:en:bag
1093:Serten
1022:Serten
939:Serten
854:Serten
838:Serten
650:Serten
520:Swabia
205:scale.
126:Google
1449:is a
1301:p. 36
1272:thing
1232:means
1160:is a
1116:penis
1114:or a
1060:penis
990:cubit
957:WP:3O
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1618:talk
1468:talk
1432:And
1423:talk
1402:talk
1386:that
1375:talk
1347:foot
1309:talk
1295:in
1258:talk
1216:unit
1206:talk
1192:talk
1170:talk
1128:talk
1097:talk
1083:talk
1077:. --
1043:talk
1026:talk
1011:talk
1001:and
984:The
969:talk
943:talk
923:talk
918:anaɢ
872:and
858:talk
842:talk
775:talk
770:anaɢ
745:talk
740:anaɢ
721:talk
695:talk
690:anaɢ
654:talk
634:talk
629:anaɢ
582:what
474:was
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1635:to
1555:RfC
1525:to
1515:to
1505:to
1445:or
1392:is
1351:leg
1148:of
1058:or
1035:Yes
999:ell
986:ell
961:AfD
881:not
731:why
711:or
620:DYK
438:of
398:Low
293:Low
176:TWL
1665::
1620:)
1568:.
1563:}}
1559:{{
1470:)
1441:A
1425:)
1404:)
1377:)
1311:)
1260:)
1208:)
1194:)
1172:)
1130:)
1099:)
1085:)
1045:)
1028:)
1013:)
971:)
963:.
945:)
925:)
911:.
860:)
844:)
777:)
763:.
747:)
723:)
697:)
673:is
656:)
636:)
622:.
522:,
156:)
54:;
1652:)
1649:☎
1646:(
1616:(
1600:)
1596:(
1583:.
1576:.
1466:(
1421:(
1400:(
1373:(
1307:(
1256:(
1224:a
1204:(
1190:(
1168:(
1126:(
1095:(
1081:(
1041:(
1024:(
1009:(
967:(
941:(
921:(
916:ʨ
914:r
876:.
856:(
840:(
773:(
768:ʨ
766:r
743:(
738:ʨ
736:r
719:(
693:(
688:ʨ
686:r
652:(
632:(
627:ʨ
625:r
595:.
539:.
478:.
410:.
305:.
211::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.