278:
298:
168:
214:
217:
The article is new enough and long enough and passes all the DYK criteria. It is not promotional and my quibble is with the hook. I see no reference in the article to O'Hara being known as "Old Cock of the Rock". How about:
171:
Nice article. No promotion or COI, not least because the place doesn't exist any more. Page size and length are both fine. Sourcing looks OK, the article is well written and illustrated as usual. This one's fine.
149:, Gibraltar-related articles are temporarily being reviewed by two individuals. In addition to the regular DYK criteria, at least one reviewer should also indicate whether they perceive any
146:
333:
123:
36:
261:
I think I will have to pick up the baton on this one as Anne seems to have left
Knowledge. I don't see any problem with ALT1 - let's use it.
17:
44:
310:
40:
286:
65:
153:
or promotional concerns about the article under review. IP addresses are not allowed to do the reviews.
306:
238:
223:
103:
266:
177:
29:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
192:
137:
108:
282:
61:
219:
262:
173:
277:
327:
150:
247:
188:
133:
297:
167:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
213:
243:
305:
is in article, cited and confirmed twice in two references. Good to go
242:
was built in the mistaken belief that it would enable the garrison at
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
251:
90:
81:
147:Knowledge talk:Did you know/GibraltarPediA Options
281:Hook needs an independent reviewer to confirm.
8:
140:). Self nom at 00:50, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
49:No further edits should be made to this page
334:Passed DYK nominations from October 2012
7:
24:
18:Template:Did you know nominations
296:
276:
212:
166:
289:) 22:55, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
269:) 21:56, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
226:) 10:04, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
107:was built at the urging of the
32:Please do not modify this page.
195:) 20:41, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
180:) 22:50, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
1:
313:) 11:07, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
68:) 06:00, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
187:Thank you for your review.
45:Knowledge talk:Did you know
37:this nomination's talk page
350:
72:
41:the article's talk page
145:Per the discussion at
132:Created/expanded by
151:conflict of interest
109:Old Cock of the Rock
141:
341:
300:
280:
216:
170:
131:
56:The result was:
34:
349:
348:
344:
343:
342:
340:
339:
338:
324:
323:
322:
307:Graeme Bartlett
97:
95:
91:Article history
75:
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
347:
345:
337:
336:
326:
325:
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
291:
290:
271:
270:
256:
255:
239:O'Hara's Tower
230:
229:
228:
227:
210:
201:
200:
199:
198:
197:
196:
182:
181:
164:
155:
154:
129:
128:
127:
126:
124:La Playa Trail
114:
113:
104:O'Hara's Tower
94:
93:
88:
78:
76:
74:
73:O'Hara's Tower
71:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
346:
335:
332:
331:
329:
312:
308:
304:
299:
295:
294:
293:
292:
288:
284:
279:
275:
274:
273:
272:
268:
264:
260:
259:
258:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
240:
235:
232:
231:
225:
221:
215:
211:
208:
205:
204:
203:
202:
194:
190:
186:
185:
184:
183:
179:
175:
169:
165:
162:
159:
158:
157:
156:
152:
148:
144:
143:
142:
139:
135:
125:
121:
118:
117:
116:
115:
112:
110:
106:
105:
99:
98:
92:
89:
87:
83:
80:
79:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
302:
237:
233:
206:
160:
130:
119:
102:
100:
85:
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
283:BlueMoonset
250:massing at
62:BlueMoonset
246:to spy on
220:Cwmhiraeth
263:Prioryman
244:Gibraltar
236:... that
174:Prioryman
101:... that
328:Category
207:Review 2
161:Review 1
120:Reviewed
58:promoted
134:ACP2011
82:Comment
301:Hook
252:Cadiz
248:ships
16:<
311:talk
303:ALT1
287:talk
267:talk
234:ALT1
224:talk
193:talk
189:Anne
178:talk
138:talk
86:view
66:talk
84:or
60:by
43:or
330::
122::
77:(
39:,
309:(
285:(
265:(
254:?
222:(
209::
191:(
176:(
163::
136:(
111:?
96:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
