Knowledge

Template:Did you know nominations/Rondo in C minor (Bruckner)

Source 📝

271: 214: 302: 217:
There seem to be some disagreements among the three contributors to this article, and two of them, Montanabw and Meneerke bloem, are not acknowledged in the nomination. Not a good sign and the situation needs to be clarified. As for the article itself, article creation date and filing date is okay,
233:
Haydn and Mendelssohn are now linked. I think the hook is interesting, but if you have alternative suggestions I'd be happy to hear them. Since the other two editors did not add any original prose, their contributions do not count towards DYK; a disagreement is being discussed on the talk page but
249:
Well, I guess this is the best hook that represents new content to WP. But I disagree about co-nominators - it is better to be generous than stingy. Anyway, I'll wait until the Talk discussion reaches a conclusion before approving this.
93: 309:
D6/D7 is that the article should be reasonably settled. I see the infobox flickering in and out, and there seem to be some other arguments. Is there a way to say "let's put this one on hold until it settles down"?
218:
article length is okay, article sourcing and neutrality is okay. Hook length and sourcing are okay but hook content is kind of dull and would need to link Haydn and Mendelssohn.
274:
I am concerned that some of the phrasing may be too close to the sources, either in the choice of words or in the structure of the sentences. A thorough review would be in order.
336: 187: 306: 88: 36: 17: 40: 289:
Hello Aymatth2, I have reviewed all of the sources and have made some amendments that should hopefully improve the article.
164: 44: 143: 83: 255: 223: 113: 118: 294: 239: 201: 65: 315: 279: 251: 219: 103: 290: 235: 197: 61: 159: 330: 311: 275: 98: 29:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
173: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
270: 213: 305:
Looks like you fixed the bit that bothered me, but I think the sense of the
123: 47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. 301: 169: 148: 108: 204:). Self nominated at 04:36, 6 September 2014 (UTC) 8: 49:No further edits should be made to this page 337:Failed DYK nominations from September 2014 71: 74: 7: 24: 297:) 03:53, 17 September 2014 (UTC) 18:Template:Did you know nominations 318:) 14:00, 17 September 2014 (UTC) 300: 282:) 23:34, 16 September 2014 (UTC) 269: 212: 68:) 01:26, 19 September 2014 (UTC) 258:) 11:23, 9 September 2014 (UTC) 242:) 15:04, 6 September 2014 (UTC) 226:) 14:40, 6 September 2014 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify this page. 158:... that according to critics 1: 234:shouldn't preclude this nom. 135:Rondo in C minor (Bruckner) 45:Knowledge talk:Did you know 37:this nomination's talk page 353: 119:Find sources (notability) 94:Earwig's Copyvio Detector 307:Supplementary guidelines 41:the article's talk page 109:A Simple Word Counter 89:Reviewer instructions 114:Reviewers' template 205: 132: 131: 344: 304: 273: 216: 195: 188:Donald R. Dwight 165:Rondo in C minor 72: 56:The result was: 34: 352: 351: 347: 346: 345: 343: 342: 341: 327: 326: 325: 155: 153: 149:Article history 137: 128: 104:Character count 69: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 350: 348: 340: 339: 329: 328: 324: 323: 322: 321: 320: 319: 284: 283: 266: 265: 264: 263: 262: 261: 260: 259: 244: 243: 228: 227: 193: 192: 191: 190: 178: 177: 152: 151: 146: 144:Back to T:TDYK 140: 138: 136: 133: 130: 129: 127: 126: 121: 116: 111: 106: 101: 96: 91: 86: 80: 77: 76: 54: 53: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 349: 338: 335: 334: 332: 317: 313: 308: 303: 299: 298: 296: 292: 288: 287: 286: 285: 281: 277: 272: 268: 267: 257: 253: 252:Wasted Time R 248: 247: 246: 245: 241: 237: 232: 231: 230: 229: 225: 221: 220:Wasted Time R 215: 211: 210: 209: 208: 207: 203: 199: 189: 185: 182: 181: 180: 179: 175: 171: 167: 166: 161: 157: 156: 150: 147: 145: 142: 141: 134: 125: 122: 120: 117: 115: 112: 110: 107: 105: 102: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 85: 82: 81: 79: 78: 73: 70: 67: 63: 59: 52: 50: 46: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 194: 183: 168:sounds like 163: 57: 55: 48: 31: 28: 196:Created by 174:Mendelssohn 124:Hook length 75:DYK toolbox 291:Nikkimaria 236:Nikkimaria 198:Nikkimaria 62:Nikkimaria 99:QPQ check 84:DYK check 331:Category 312:Aymatth2 276:Aymatth2 184:Reviewed 160:Bruckner 58:rejected 170:Haydn 16:< 316:talk 295:talk 280:talk 256:talk 240:talk 224:talk 202:talk 66:talk 172:or 162:'s 60:by 43:or 333:: 206:. 186:: 139:( 39:, 314:( 293:( 278:( 254:( 238:( 222:( 200:( 176:? 154:) 64:( 51:.

Index

Template:Did you know nominations
this nomination's talk page
the article's talk page
Knowledge talk:Did you know
Nikkimaria
talk
DYK check
Reviewer instructions
Earwig's Copyvio Detector
QPQ check
Character count
A Simple Word Counter
Reviewers' template
Find sources (notability)
Hook length
Back to T:TDYK
Article history
Bruckner
Rondo in C minor
Haydn
Mendelssohn
Donald R. Dwight
Nikkimaria
talk

Wasted Time R
talk
Nikkimaria
talk
Wasted Time R

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.