160:
270:
376:
269:, just to add for context the Stowe Gardens page was initially a split from the Stowe House page. I moved the content from there in good faith. In terms of the copyvio, the VIPA page seems to me to be mirroring the content when it was on the Stowe House page originally?
277:
is the page in March 2015. If you compare the two, the content on the Stowe House page, under the subheading Stowe
Landscape Gardens seems to be what the VIPA page is based on. I'd be really pleased if another pair of eyes could take a look at it to confirm
252:. I think someone needs to have a look and determine if this is a mirror or copy pasted. The image is clear and has the correct license and FOP exists in the image location. The hook is cited and interesting. Hold for now until CC is determined.
350:
if the article's not a copyright violation, we're good on that front; I'm kind of wondering whether there are any restrictions on DYK paid editing post-Gibraltar controversy, but I can't find anything, so I think it's good to go.
303:(which I should have originally put in the nomination), is that working on the Stowe Gardens page and submitting a DYK nomination was part of a paid pilot scheme for the National Trust. There's more detail on this
193:
93:
249:
159:
229:
182:
Source: "Standing out among this set of 'British
Worthies' is also the solitary female among them, Queen Elizabeth I. Above her bust read an inscription emphasizing her merits ..."
36:
413:
88:
205:
on 28 Jan for when I first asked for advice on what to do since the original DYK template was occupied. I created this nomination in response to
360:
17:
324:
I can AGF on the mirror. I was stalled out looking at the "paid pilot scheme" called out above. I will also leave a ping for
206:
44:
304:
183:
356:
143:
83:
113:
65:
40:
382:
352:
327:
118:
312:
283:
221:
202:
392:
337:
257:
103:
61:
224:). Self-nominated at 14:29, 7 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom
225:
308:
279:
243:
233:
217:
407:
300:
176:
98:
29:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
388:
345:
333:
266:
253:
184:
https://artuk.org/discover/curations/patriots-in-the-landscape/template/storyline
375:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
236:
this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
123:
273:
suggests that the page was first archived by Google in May 2015 &
170:... that the only woman to feature in the Temple of British Worthies
47:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
274:
148:
230:
Template talk:Did you know nominations/Stowe
Gardens 2
108:
248:Improved to good article status. 98.4% match for
8:
49:No further edits should be made to this page
71:
414:Passed DYK nominations from February 2023
363:) (she/her) 01:18, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
299:& a further note, at the request of
74:
7:
332:to make sure we are good for green.
68:) 14:47, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
216:Improved to Good Article status by
164:Temple of British Worthies (front)
24:
45:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Did you know
18:Template:Did you know nominations
374:
340:) 15:19, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
260:) 20:43, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
158:
395:) 01:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
379:Thank you much for the opinion
315:) 16:44, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
286:) 09:25, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
194:Virginia Quay Settlers Monument
32:Please do not modify this page.
1:
37:this nomination's talk page
430:
387:! I moved the green tick.
119:Find sources (notability)
94:Earwig's Copyvio Detector
41:the article's talk page
265:Thanks for the review
109:A Simple Word Counter
89:Reviewer instructions
250:copyright violations
114:Reviewers' template
237:
186:
132:
131:
421:
386:
383:Theleekycauldron
378:
353:theleekycauldron
349:
331:
328:Theleekycauldron
247:
215:
181:
180:is Elizabeth I?
162:
72:
56:The result was:
34:
429:
428:
424:
423:
422:
420:
419:
418:
404:
403:
402:
380:
343:
325:
241:
167:
166:
165:
155:
153:
149:Article history
137:
128:
104:Character count
69:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
427:
425:
417:
416:
406:
405:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
367:
366:
365:
364:
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
226:will be logged
213:
212:
211:
210:
196:
163:
157:
156:
152:
151:
146:
144:Back to T:TDYK
140:
138:
136:
133:
130:
129:
127:
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
101:
96:
91:
86:
80:
77:
76:
54:
53:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
426:
415:
412:
411:
409:
394:
390:
384:
377:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
362:
358:
354:
347:
342:
341:
339:
335:
329:
323:
322:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
285:
281:
276:
272:
268:
264:
263:
262:
261:
259:
255:
251:
245:
240:
239:
238:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
208:
204:
201:: Please see
200:
197:
195:
191:
188:
187:
185:
179:
178:
177:Stowe Gardens
173:
169:
168:
161:
150:
147:
145:
142:
141:
135:Stowe Gardens
134:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
79:
78:
73:
70:
67:
63:
59:
52:
50:
46:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
214:
203:this comment
198:
189:
175:
171:
62:Cielquiparle
57:
55:
48:
31:
28:
232:; consider
124:Hook length
75:DYK toolbox
207:this reply
172:(pictured)
309:Lajmmoore
280:Lajmmoore
275:this link
271:This link
244:Lajmmoore
218:Lajmmoore
99:QPQ check
84:DYK check
408:Category
361:contribs
301:TSventon
234:watching
190:Reviewed
58:promoted
389:Bruxton
346:Bruxton
334:Bruxton
267:Bruxton
254:Bruxton
220: (
199:Comment
209:today.
16:<
393:talk
357:talk
338:talk
313:talk
305:here
284:talk
258:talk
222:talk
66:talk
228:at
174:at
60:by
43:or
410::
359:•
307:.
192::
139:(
39:,
391:(
385::
381:@
355:(
348::
344:@
336:(
330::
326:@
311:(
282:(
256:(
246::
242:@
154:)
64:(
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
