474:"As Stowe evolved from an English baroque garden into a pioneering landscape park, the gardens became an attraction for many of the nobility, including political leaders. Wars and rebellions were reputedly discussed among the garden's many temples; the artwork of the time reflected this by portraying caricatures of the better-known politicians of history taking their ease in similar settings. Stowe began to evolve into a series of natural views to be appreciated from a perambulation rather than from a well-chosen central point. In their final form the Gardens were the largest and most elaborate example of what became known in Europe as the English garden. Many of the temples and monuments in the garden celebrate the political ideas of the Whig party and include quotes by many of the writers who are part of Augustan literature, also philosophers and ideas belonging to the Age of Enlightenment."
1997:). Unless a scholar has remarked on the assemblage and made some deep point about their significance, there's little or no justification for such a mass of primary material. Currently the explanation given in the text is "The choice of who was considered a 'British Worthy' was very much influenced by the Whig politics of the family, the chosen individuals falling into two groups, eight known for their actions and eight known for their thoughts and ideas." I'm not sure that single sentence justifies including any of the images, let alone all of them. The implication is rather that the actual art (style of sculpture, quality, accuracy of representation, etc) is tangential to the single thought that Whig politics were important, i.e. that the images are not needed in the encyclopedia.
2612:
618:
919:
134:
2729:
1829:
approximately 9,000 grade I listings in
England and Wales" is remarkably close to worthless: 27 out of 9000 would be 0.3%, so I suppose some buildings have 2 or more listings for different aspects, but this doesn't seem encyclopedic in any way. In "Arts", we're told there are engravings, wash drawings, china, and watercolours, just the bare facts. At least these are cited, but the feeling is as if we had nothing but primary facts here, with no interpretation by scholars and critics. Even the "Poetry" section is entirely without comment (beyond the poems themselves).
1900:
over three hundred years." The last of these is a bare fact, and at least broadly supported by the "Early tourism" section, though the "over three hundred years" does rather skip over the question of whether such tourism was continuous, or whether there was a burst of it in the 18th century, revived in the 20th? The other claims seem to be lacking support at the moment, or at least, it's not very conspicuous. The article would, in any event, be much strengthened by some reliably-cited discussion of these claims to fame, which are obviously important to the article.
212:
2449:
311:
290:
1748:, rather interesting, article suggests that the inscription for Elizabeth I, the only woman, is telling as to why she was included, and the message that the temple was intended to send; "Who confounded the Projects, and destroyed the Power, that threatened to oppress the Liberties of Europe... and, by a wise, a moderate, and a popular Government, gave Wealth, Security, and Respect to England." Might be worth a swap?
202:
420:
395:
181:
21:
2229:, is entitled "The significance of the 'superb mansion at Stowe'" and begins; "Stowe House is the centrepiece of a landscape garden of international repute". Similarly, the Pevsner begins, "But more important even than the mansion was the 18th century garden and park." There's also the key point about the sheer number of blue-chip designers who undertook work there; Bridgeman, Vanbrugh, Kent, Gibbs, Brown etc. If
690:
150:
2847:
321:
2149:
2136:
2123:
2110:
2004:
1987:
1973:
1956:
1892:
1822:
1782:
1719:
1705:
1692:
1679:
1666:
1653:
1636:
1623:
1253:
1241:
1199:
1178:
1157:
1134:
1113:
1090:
1072:
1052:
75:
1790:
and not offer a bit more detail? It would help if some of "th' ambitious Hill" and other such 18th century allusions could be keyed directly to the
Gardens: a sketch map would be a blessing too. The Plan in "Early tourism" is unfortunately so fuzzy as to be unusable, but its basic outlines could be traced and overlaid with numbers or text labels for navigation.
1534:
2444:
I think it looks great! And I love the galleries. I've folded the extra
Sources into the bibliography. I think you're nearly there, and if there's anything else I can do to help, just shout. One thought - I think the lead image in the infobox is....boring. It's not a great image, in a number of ways,
2384:
this is fantastic! Thank you very much indeed for the new sources and the work combining the existing material. It reads very well. I wasn't aware of the 2022 DTE issues, but think it is very good to include it in the article - thanks for bringing it in. Would you like me to start combining it in, or
1789:
Not sure if the very long extracts of poetry really work in an article. Much better would be a few short extracts from each poem, together with scholarly comments</; at the moment we have almost no secondary commentary and a large mass of primary material, which seems the wrong way around. Do refs
832:- most of the editing has been re-structuring and adding referencing to the content on the page. I have never been involved with FA, and only once with GA, so if either of you have a suggestion on which might be a good route to take, I would be very keen to hear it. Thanks for your guidance and help
1899:
That takes us back to the lead, which boldly asserts "arguably the most significant example of the
English landscape garden style." and " notable for the scale, the design, the size and the number of monuments set across the designed landscape", and "the fact they have been a tourist attraction for
1979:
Why do we need images of all 4 statues in the Temple of
Ancient Virtue, with both Latin and English? It's not clear that they add anything of significance to the article. If a scholar has written that they epitomize the Temple family's attitude etc etc then there might be a reason. If not, they're
1711:
Not sure about the function of the paragraph of "interior inscriptions above the doors" in "Temple of
Ancient Virtue", again with a generous helping in two languages. The citation to Clarke may prove that these are genuine, but no indication of what Clarke or others think about the inscriptions is
2096:
As I already suggested, the best thing is to scroll to find the section or subsection, and then to look at the table of contents to find the chapter number and title. Other approaches are to use ordinary Google search with an exact phrase which you know is on the right page; to use the
Knowledge
1906:
Overlinks - there are quite a few revealed by the tool, e.g. Grade I listed, Bridgeman, Buckingham, Apollo, Stowe, Scheemakers (several times), James Gibbs (several times), Britannia, Rysbrack, Whig politics, exedra, Coade stone, doric, entablature, William Kent (several times), Vincenzo Valdre,
2310:
I've added the extra works I've used in an "Additional sources" section. I'm not quite sure how to handle these as some current sources are cited in the "Bibliography" section, and sfn-linked to the
References, while others are cited in full in the "References" section. Personally, I prefer the
2314:
I've put a paragraph in on the recent controversy over the DTE block. It doesn't belong in the "Critical significance" section but would, I think, sit well as the conclusion to the "21st century" History sub-section. Personally, I think it raises an interesting point around the school/historic
1828:
There is a very short "Cultural significance" section, which apart from the quoted poetry comes to less than 350 words in an article of over 140,000 bytes. This is inadequate, as it's this section that justifies having an article at all. As for the claims, "These account for nearly 0.5% of the
640:
Source: "By 1734 the niche at the back of the Temple of
British Worthies housed a long inscription to a pious Italian, Signor Fido, who had come to England and in his old age had retired to house of a clergyman in the country (perhaps Rev. Conway Rand of Stowe). This faithful friend, agreeable
743:
Hmmm. While there's no rule specifically against that, I would probably IAR decline any article that was GA nommed immediately after its split. But if the split weighs in at, say, C-class, and is then improved to GA with original work, that's totally fine. Alternatively, the article can be 5x
2318:
Assuming you want to incorporate some/all of the section, we'll need to work out how to splice it in, but it shouldn't be too difficult. Aside for the
Additional sources issue noted above, I think I've followed your referencing style. Then we'll obviously need to see whether it addresses
1672:"it was altered and adapted as the gardens were progressively naturalised." Perhaps this is running ahead here: readers will not know what "naturalised" means, and it doesn't really need to be mentioned at this point anyway. Could just say "later remodelled" or something of that sort.
779:), the split version (2nd edit) is rated as C (48.6%) by the rating tool and the latest version (68th edit) as B or above (96.8%), so a lot of work has been done to the article. Do you agree it would be eligible for DYK if promoted to GA, obviously subject to the normal review?
2186:
Well, I think we could all go on polishing and formatting this for quite a while, but I'm confident that the article now covers "the main points" and I hope everyone will agree it is more balanced, justifying the confident claims in the lead rather better. It's a Good Article.
2728:, just to add for context the Stowe Gardens page was initially a split from the Stowe House page. I moved the content from there in good faith. In terms of the copyvio, the VIPA page seems to me to be mirroring the content when it was on the Stowe House page originally?
1907:
Thomas Pitt, ha-ha, belvederes, Borra, Wotton House, Beech, Kinloss, Blore, Trent park, Homer, Socrates, Epaminondas, Walpole, Wedgwood, Alexander Pope (that one may be acceptable in the context, or you could use a "further" link to him at the head of the section).
2736:
is the page in March 2015. If you compare the two, the content on the Stowe House page, under the subheading Stowe Landscape Gardens seems to be what the VIPA page is based on. I'd be really pleased if another pair of eyes could take a look at it to confirm
2708:. I think someone needs to have a look and determine if this is a mirror or copy pasted. The image is clear and has the correct license and FOP exists in the image location. The hook is cited and interesting. Hold for now until CC is determined.
1946:
Much improved. A bit of a mess remains after the section "Features close to Oxford Avenue" where there's still a column of images straying into the next section(s); again, these would much better be organised as a gallery like the ones
2010:
Same for the Saxon deities really. They don't seem remarkable as sculpture (again, maybe scholars have said otherwise), but are chiefly of interest for the Whig theory again. One image (the one in the V&A, probably) would seem to
2306:
I've tried to fold in your existing "Architecture and design" / "Arts" / "Planting" / "Poetry" sub-sections without altering the text too much. But I may not have achieved this! Also, I have a weakness for quotes which you may not
2818:
if the article's not a copyright violation, we're good on that front; I'm kind of wondering whether there are any restrictions on DYK paid editing post-Gibraltar controversy, but I can't find anything, so I think it's good to go.
2053:
Good use has been made of the main sources like Clarke and Bevington. The same can't be said of the more minor sources where quite a few refs are to entire books without page numbers (or possibly chapter/section names):
2225:, although there are plenty of others. While the Morris focuses primarily on the house, the gardens get good coverage, and it's probably the most up-to-date study of Stowe around. As an example, the first chapter, by
2765:(which I should have originally put in the nomination), is that working on the Stowe Gardens page and submitting a DYK nomination was part of a paid pilot scheme for the National Trust. There's more detail on this
2645:
1725:
The same goes for the long inscription about the dog in "The Temple of British Worthies". This comes across as rich man's whimsy and sentimentality, so unless there is some scholarly comment about it, it's
1300:
have more information on them than the NHLE ones - the NT update theirs, and the info does not necessarily move across. It wouldn't (probably) take too long to supply the NHLE one as a supplementary source?
952:
1418:- do you mean when it looks like this: "... to gain admittance to the property." - if so the 144 is the page number of the book. If I've misunderstood, please could you give me a little more detail?
1399:
Throughout the article, along with the standard reference superscripts, you have inserted another fixed series, what are these supposed to mean, there doesn't seem to be any key or map to refer to?
272:
2933:
722:, I had looked for terms like "article splitting" in the rules, not the more generic wording. Never mind. If it became promoted to GA, would/could it be eligible? Many thanks for taking the time
262:
2253:
yes I'd be very grateful for the help on that topic! Please go ahead. I'll work on some of the more technical things above, and make sure I use an 'in use' template when I am actively editing.
2958:
2417:
thank so much for the work you put in. Please would you be able to check that the additional sources are incorporated? I got tangled with the styles and don't think I have been able to do it.
880:- the article is now GA, and I tried to re-submit a DYK, but I got a message that the Template was in use - would you be able to guide me as to what to do? This is the nomination template:
2705:
470:
This is the text from a section on enlightenment politics and the garden. it was originally copy/pasted from the Stowe House page, however, it needs referencing and probably expansion:
2938:
238:
2611:
617:
2685:
2634:
Source: "Standing out among this set of 'British Worthies' is also the solitary female among them, Queen Elizabeth I. Above her bust read an inscription emphasizing her merits ..."
941:
Source: "Standing out among this set of 'British Worthies' is also the solitary female among them, Queen Elizabeth I. Above her bust read an inscription emphasizing her merits ..."
798:: Yes, I think any reasonable interpretation of the edit history would hold that a lot of good-faith work was put into this article to have it qualify for GAÂ :) for the record, my
2928:
918:
2303:
You may feel there is too much overlap between the existing "Enlightenment politics" section and the suggested "Sermon in stone" sub-section. They could perhaps be combined;
2090:
225:
186:
1572:
2595:
2082:
Page numbers or equivalent are required. Google Books search does in fact give page nos in snippets. Or you can give named and numbered chapters and named subsections.
126:
2948:
367:
902:
601:
1562:
32:
2893:
652:
520:
To be more explicit, this page was created from an article split of content at Stowe House. It is part of a short paid pilot commissioned by the National Trust.
1539:
1712:
given, nor their significance, if any. One can't help wondering if they were purely to give an antique air, in which case the paragraph isn't really justified.
478:
Since the time for the National Trust pilot is coming to a close, I've moved the text here, in hope that a fellow editior might want to tackle it. Best wishes
2918:
2923:
377:
2943:
696:, this is an interesting article, but unfortunately it does not qualify as a new article, because its text was spun off from a pre-existing article (see
1914:
Please could you point me to the overlink tool? I don't currently use it and it seems that with such a long article it would be useful to address this.
1935:
There is a lot of sandwiching, where a pair of images to left and right squeeze the text into a narrow column if the window is made relatively narrow.
2506:
Not sure this sort of summarizing is a good idea as we have a list already. You have however missed the image placement item which is not completed.
1432:
That was what I was referring to, page numbers should be inside the ref tags. See the cite templates in the edit area for the way to do it. Regards
426:
400:
122:
2657:
on 28 Jan for when I first asked for advice on what to do since the original DYK template was occupied. I created this nomination in response to
2445:
and some playing fields are front and centre. Stowe has fewer Good images than one might expect, but there's got to be something more exciting.
1939:
is a good example, but there are plenty of others. We'll do better to arrange groups of images in small galleries at intervals through the text.
2828:
859:
811:
753:
46:
343:
133:
998:
1238:
Images - too many? I love illustrations, and this article cries out for them, but there are an awful lot. This creates the second issue:
1611:
1544:
2913:
2953:
1567:
38:
1852:
I'm so sorry, I didn't realise that was the convention - I was just doing it to keep track. Shall I unstrike them once I'm through?
1264:
NT refs. An alternative, which I prefer, is the NHLE template. But it’s just a preference and the NT records may include more info.
799:
334:
295:
2085:
I agree it does if the google books search returns a snippet view, but not all publishers release the works with pages numbers
1318:
I think I worked out how to remove the white space - template:clear was in use below each paragraph, and I pruned a few images
161:
2789:
I can AGF on the mirror. I was stalled out looking at the "paid pilot scheme" called out above. I will also leave a ping for
664:
page, according to a previous talk page discussion. The source is not available online, but I can email my pdf to a reviewer.
2658:
2554:
2213:
Re. CC's, very valid, point on Cultural significance, I think there are sources that could usefully be mined to demonstrate
1659:
Punning reference: the motto is clearly punning, but can one speak of physical installations as such? Maybe reword a little.
560:
2399:
Very glad that there's something you can use. Entirely easy as to how/who does the combine - whichever works best for you.
1518:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2766:
2527:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
521:
1290:
White space - yes! I have tried and not managed to work out how to fix it - do you know a person/project we could ask?
1698:
Lancelot 'Capability' Brown - not sure why the "Lancelot" and the scare quotes here at 2nd mention, nor the overlink.
2635:
1745:
942:
2824:
1250:
Masses of white space - this isn’t my area of expertise, and if it’s not yours either, we may need to seek advice.
855:
807:
749:
581:
2270:- Don’t worry about “In use”. You edit the article and I’ll look to work something up in a sandbox. All the best.
1921:
into your common.js page, i.e. User:Lajmmoore/common.js - obvs I'm not responsible for anything you do over there.
1287:
Images - I just moved these all over when I split the page from Stowe House - I have no strong feelings about them
1736:
I've shortened this quotation, subject to looking for more secondary literature - I may yet remove it all though.
2315:
landscape challenge, and also around the relationship between the school and the Trust. But obviously your call.
1836:
This is much improved. Thanks to both of you. BTW normally the reviewer strikes items once they're satisfied...
1586:
1966:" are much too large (area = width x height) compared to the standard image. As well as sandwiching, see above.
1918:
2217:
architectural/landscape historians etc. think the gardens at Stowe are so important. Two obvious examples are
167:
2348:
Looks like good progress at first glance. There are orange links to dab pages for Claremont and eye-catcher.
2511:
2353:
2192:
2176:
2086:
1873:
1841:
1605:
1502:
850:! GA would be your first stop – just keep the GA criteria in the back of your head when making this better!
1994:
431:
405:
2575:
1643:
1590:
1473:
1437:
1404:
660:: The page was created as part of a paid pilot for the National Trust, and its content was split from the
211:
53:
20:
2853:
2820:
2792:
2142:"Museum, Victoria and Albert". Shome short of mishtake, shurely, Mr and Mrs Museum? (Maybe link it, too)
1642:
Domesday Book. Not clear why this should be mentioned here; it might be relevant to the village article
1450:
for pointing this out - I hadn't realised there was a template, so I'm just replacing them according to
877:
851:
829:
803:
772:
745:
577:
342:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
237:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
90:
2116:, an encyclopedia, should name the applicable entry, presumably with the word "Stowe" in it somewhere.
2171:
This is a well-made article that only needs some rather minor attention, and it will be a worthy GA.
1731:
697:
42:
2774:
2742:
2673:
2494:
2448:
2422:
2390:
2258:
1857:
1767:
1459:
1423:
1385:
1377:
1351:
1337:
1323:
1309:
1223:
982:
966:
837:
727:
676:
528:
506:
483:
2507:
2349:
2320:
2291:
2188:
2172:
1869:
1837:
1601:
1498:
784:
709:
1727:
1293:
Quotations - again, I moved the content over when the page was split. I agree they are too long.
497:
Just a note on the direct move to article space, rather than using AfC. This is based on advice
74:
628:... that the tomb of a greyhound called Signor Fido lies behind the Temple of British Worthies
2863:
2802:
2713:
2571:
1469:
1447:
1433:
1415:
1400:
802:
shows that FA is currently the strongest rating, but the average rating is somewhat above GA.
2034:. Perhaps a brief quote illustrating the views of Callophilus and Polyphthon would be useful.
498:
217:
701:
2681:
994:
1917:
Not my job, but you need to put the line importScript('User:Evad37/duplinks-alt.js'); //
2770:
2738:
2699:
2689:
2669:
2490:
2460:
2418:
2404:
2386:
2371:
2334:
2287:
2275:
2267:
2254:
2238:
2230:
1853:
1763:
1753:
1455:
1419:
1381:
1347:
1333:
1319:
1305:
1269:
1219:
1002:
978:
974:
962:
847:
833:
776:
738:
723:
693:
672:
524:
502:
479:
326:
2907:
2762:
2628:
2226:
2155:- what is Getty Research Institute to do with this 18th century text. Please delete.
1936:
935:
873:
863:
825:
815:
795:
780:
757:
719:
705:
643:
Bevington, Michael (1994). Stowe: The Garden and the Park. Capability Books. pp.93-94
634:
110:
2539:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
1018:
Points to consider when working to move the page to GA status, please add to them:
545:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.
2859:
2813:
2798:
2725:
2709:
310:
289:
230:
689:
201:
180:
95:
2636:
https://artuk.org/discover/curations/patriots-in-the-landscape/template/storyline
943:
https://artuk.org/discover/curations/patriots-in-the-landscape/template/storyline
1451:
661:
115:
2846:
2545:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
1963:
1191:
Content on the importance of green space - not just buildings needed in article
551:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
419:
394:
2692:
this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
316:
207:
2456:
2414:
2400:
2381:
2367:
2330:
2271:
2250:
2234:
2218:
2093:- if you have a way to access them I would very much appreciate hearing it!
1993:
Same for the 16 statues and inscriptions in the Temple of British Worthies (
1749:
1646:
but the connection with the gardens is not apparent. Suggest we just cut it.
1281:
1265:
1213:
970:
641:
companion and loving husband was, according to the last line, a grey-hound."
234:
85:
2222:
1593:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
1194:
Added paragraph - would appreciate feedback if it feels in the right place
1376:
Editor Rodw gave some helpful comments to support work toward GA status.
1173:
Added paragraphs, based on content above, but with additional referencing
1005:
a successfully closed nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.
2455:
You've done a superb job on this, and I fully expect it to hit GA soon.
229:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
339:
2867:
2832:
2806:
2778:
2746:
2732:
suggests that the page was first archived by Google in May 2015 &
2717:
2677:
2579:
2515:
2498:
2464:
2426:
2408:
2394:
2375:
2357:
2338:
2279:
2262:
2242:
2196:
2180:
1877:
1861:
1845:
1771:
1762:
Thanks very much for this infomation - you're right it is a good swap
1757:
1615:
1506:
1477:
1463:
1441:
1427:
1408:
1389:
1355:
1341:
1327:
1313:
1273:
1227:
986:
867:
841:
819:
788:
761:
731:
713:
680:
585:
532:
510:
487:
2622:... that the only woman to feature in the Temple of British Worthies
2557:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
2233:
would like, I'd be pleased to work with them to beef up the section.
929:... that the only woman to feature in the Temple of British Worthies
563:), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.
104:... that the only woman to feature in the Temple of British Worthies
2447:
2157:(They sponsored the digitisation, so clarified that in reference.)
1235:
I think it’s a very good summary. A few other things to consider:
1170:
More content of politics and Stowe is already identified as a gap
953:
Template:Did you know nominations/Virginia Quay Settlers Monument
744:
expanded with original work, but I doubt that's in the question.
1261:
Quotations - as with images, these are extensive, too extensive?
700:). DYK has a lot of small print, so I would recommend rereading
1809:
Not to worry for GA. Someone will probably make one eventually.
2097:(XXG) Library Request; to visit a library; or to buy the book.
143:
69:
15:
2311:
former and I've set them up to allow for that, but your call;
1804:
I don't think I have the skills to produce a map I'm afraid.
132:
2300:
It's a draft, for you to accept/reject/alter as you choose;
2129:
does not seem to be fully described with respect to Stowe.
2069:, (via google books, which has no page numbers online),
2063:, (via google books, which has no page numbers online),
2057:, (via google books, which has no page numbers online),
1346:
Additions to complete the preparation work for GA review
993:: As of October 2022, all changes made to promoted hooks
2290:- I've had a stab at a "Cultural significance" section,
1868:
Not to worry now, just leave it, I can see what's what.
2733:
2600:
2591:
907:
898:
606:
597:
59:
2686:
Template talk:Did you know nominations/Stowe Gardens 2
997:
by a bot. The log for this nomination can be found at
247:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening
125:. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
2329:
Give me a shout when you've had a chance to review.
1937:
Stowe Gardens#Statues surrounding the Grecian Valley
999:
Template talk:Did you know nominations/Stowe Gardens
338:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
2934:
High-importance Horticulture and gardening articles
2959:Articles that have been nominated for Did you know
2704:Improved to good article status. 98.4% match for
127:Template:Did you know nominations/Stowe Gardens 2
2219:Stowe House: Saving an Architectural Masterpiece
1685:"Capability Brown, all made" - remove the comma.
429:, a project which is currently considered to be
45:. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
2939:WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening articles
1380:I'll work through them to improve the article.
250:Template:WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening
2480:Add further secondary commentary on poetry (?)
653:Template:Did you know nominations/Reina Scully
8:
2929:GA-Class Horticulture and gardening articles
2654:
2559:No further edits should be made to this page
565:No further edits should be made to this page
2680:. Post-promotion hook changes for this nom
441:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Buckinghamshire
123:Knowledge (XXG):Recent additions/2023/March
1522:
389:
284:
175:
98:). The text of the entry was as follows:
2761:& a further note, at the request of
1284:, so thinking about each point in turn:
1020:
2949:Mid-importance England-related articles
2892:was invoked but never defined (see the
2878:
1553:
1525:
391:
286:
177:
2366:CC - many thanks. Have removed these.
226:WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening
2924:Knowledge (XXG) Did you know articles
1210:What do you think to this as a start
121:A record of the entry may be seen at
7:
2797:to make sure we are good for green.
1514:The following discussion is closed.
444:Template:WikiProject Buckinghamshire
425:This article is within the scope of
332:This article is within the scope of
223:This article is within the scope of
149:
147:
2884:
2668:Improved to Good Article status by
961:Improved to Good Article status by
352:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject England
253:Horticulture and gardening articles
166:It is of interest to the following
2919:Art and architecture good articles
2616:Temple of British Worthies (front)
622:Temple of British Worthies (front)
522:There is further information here.
33:Art and architecture good articles
14:
2944:GA-Class England-related articles
2555:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Did you know
1801:more secondary material on poetry
561:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Did you know
41:. If you can improve it further,
2845:
2610:
2523:The discussion above is closed.
2147:
2134:
2121:
2108:
2002:
1985:
1971:
1954:
1890:
1820:
1780:
1717:
1703:
1690:
1677:
1664:
1651:
1634:
1621:
1251:
1239:
1197:
1176:
1155:
1132:
1111:
1088:
1070:
1050:
917:
688:
616:
418:
393:
319:
309:
288:
210:
200:
179:
148:
73:
19:
2850:Thank you much for the opinion
2646:Virginia Quay Settlers Monument
2542:Please do not modify this page.
2477:Add quote for Callophilus, etc.
2473:Four remaining tasks are left:
1014:Working towards a GA nomination
548:Please do not modify this page.
466:Section: Enlightenment politics
372:This article has been rated as
267:This article has been rated as
84:appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s
29:has been listed as one of the
1:
2914:Knowledge (XXG) good articles
2868:01:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
2833:01:18, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
2807:15:19, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
2779:16:44, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
2747:09:25, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
2718:20:43, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
2580:14:47, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
1478:20:46, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
1464:20:37, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
1442:18:47, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
1428:18:41, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
1409:18:23, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
1390:18:43, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
1356:20:09, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
346:and see a list of open tasks.
241:and see a list of open tasks.
2678:14:29, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
2516:19:47, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
2499:19:45, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
2465:21:24, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
2427:19:29, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
2409:18:24, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
2395:18:03, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
2376:13:58, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
2358:13:45, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
2339:13:37, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
2280:21:54, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
2263:14:47, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
2243:13:29, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
2197:10:55, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
2181:16:30, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
1878:21:45, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
1862:19:26, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
1846:19:17, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
1772:19:23, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
1758:08:44, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
1616:15:10, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
1507:10:56, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
1342:16:34, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
1328:21:40, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
1314:17:01, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
1274:12:45, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
987:13:22, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
355:Template:WikiProject England
2547:this nomination's talk page
1228:10:49, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
868:17:23, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
842:10:05, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
820:07:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
789:07:43, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
762:19:23, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
732:18:23, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
714:14:49, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
681:14:35, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
586:21:55, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
553:this nomination's talk page
533:09:24, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
516:Paid pilot - National Trust
511:09:22, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
488:08:54, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
427:WikiProject Buckinghamshire
2975:
2858:! I moved the green tick.
923:Temple of British Worthies
378:project's importance scale
273:project's importance scale
244:Horticulture and Gardening
187:Horticulture and Gardening
2954:WikiProject England pages
2532:Did you know nomination 2
2089:is an example, so too is
1798:Long extracts are removed
1188:Plant schemes & Stowe
413:
371:
304:
266:
195:
174:
94:column on 10 March 2023 (
2525:Please do not modify it.
2486:3 x page numbers to find
1919:User:Evad37/duplinks-alt
1516:Please do not modify it.
1332:added ticks for clarity
499:here from editor Johnbod
447:Buckinghamshire articles
358:England-related articles
2551:the article's talk page
2223:Buckinghamshire Pevsner
557:the article's talk page
538:Did you know nomination
2724:Thanks for the review
2453:
1744:A thought about Fido.
1644:Stowe, Buckinghamshire
1591:Talk:Stowe Gardens/GA1
1082:Addresses main aspects
156:This article is rated
137:
2676:). Self-nominated at
2451:
2208:Cultural significance
800:specialized ORES tool
679:). Self-nominated at
493:Move to article space
160:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
136:
57:: January 28, 2023. (
39:good article criteria
2888:The named reference
2706:copyright violations
1964:The Boycott Pavilion
1167:Politics & Stowe
2385:would you like to?
1468:Glad to be of help
1395:Superscript numbers
1296:NT refs - so these
1023:
335:WikiProject England
2483:Sort out overlinks
2454:
1962:Some images like "
1517:
1372:Comments from Rodw
1021:
824:Thanks very much @
162:content assessment
138:
2693:
2638:
2030:but not the 1748
1581:
1580:
1515:
1208:
1207:
1006:
945:
684:
645:
463:
462:
459:
458:
455:
454:
388:
387:
384:
383:
283:
282:
279:
278:
142:
141:
68:
67:
64:
2966:
2899:
2898:
2897:
2891:
2883:
2857:
2854:Theleekycauldron
2849:
2821:theleekycauldron
2817:
2796:
2793:Theleekycauldron
2703:
2667:
2633:
2632:is Elizabeth I?
2614:
2566:The result was:
2544:
2294:. A few things:
2221:and the revised
2154:
2151:
2150:
2141:
2138:
2137:
2128:
2125:
2124:
2115:
2112:
2111:
2009:
2006:
2005:
1992:
1989:
1988:
1980:basically undue.
1978:
1975:
1974:
1961:
1958:
1957:
1897:
1894:
1893:
1827:
1824:
1823:
1787:
1784:
1783:
1724:
1721:
1720:
1710:
1707:
1706:
1697:
1694:
1693:
1684:
1681:
1680:
1671:
1668:
1667:
1658:
1655:
1654:
1641:
1638:
1637:
1628:
1625:
1624:
1535:Copyvio detector
1523:
1280:Thanks so much @
1258:
1255:
1254:
1246:
1243:
1242:
1217:
1204:
1201:
1200:
1183:
1180:
1179:
1162:
1159:
1158:
1139:
1136:
1135:
1118:
1115:
1114:
1095:
1092:
1091:
1077:
1074:
1073:
1057:
1054:
1053:
1024:
977:). Nominated by
960:
940:
939:is Elizabeth I?
921:
878:Theleekycauldron
852:theleekycauldron
830:Theleekycauldron
804:theleekycauldron
773:Theleekycauldron
746:theleekycauldron
742:
692:
670:
639:
620:
578:Theleekycauldron
572:The result was:
550:
449:
448:
445:
442:
439:
422:
415:
414:
409:
397:
390:
360:
359:
356:
353:
350:
329:
324:
323:
322:
313:
306:
305:
300:
292:
285:
255:
254:
251:
248:
245:
220:
218:Gardening portal
215:
214:
204:
197:
196:
191:
183:
176:
159:
153:
152:
151:
144:
77:
70:
62:
60:Reviewed version
51:
23:
16:
2974:
2973:
2969:
2968:
2967:
2965:
2964:
2963:
2904:
2903:
2902:
2889:
2887:
2885:
2880:
2876:
2851:
2811:
2790:
2697:
2619:
2618:
2617:
2607:
2605:
2601:Article history
2540:
2534:
2529:
2528:
2471:
2469:Remaining tasks
2205:
2203:Comment by KJP1
2169:
2152:
2148:
2139:
2135:
2126:
2122:
2113:
2109:
2026:cites the 1749
2018:
2007:
2003:
1990:
1986:
1976:
1972:
1959:
1955:
1932:
1895:
1891:
1825:
1821:
1785:
1781:
1722:
1718:
1708:
1704:
1695:
1691:
1682:
1678:
1669:
1665:
1656:
1652:
1639:
1635:
1631:
1626:
1622:
1585:This review is
1577:
1549:
1520:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1492:
1397:
1374:
1256:
1252:
1244:
1240:
1211:
1202:
1198:
1181:
1177:
1160:
1156:
1137:
1133:
1116:
1112:
1093:
1089:
1075:
1071:
1055:
1051:
1016:
926:
925:
924:
914:
912:
908:Article history
846:Happy to help,
770:
736:
625:
624:
623:
613:
611:
607:Article history
546:
540:
518:
495:
468:
446:
443:
440:
438:Buckinghamshire
437:
436:
403:
401:Buckinghamshire
357:
354:
351:
348:
347:
325:
320:
318:
298:
269:High-importance
252:
249:
246:
243:
242:
216:
209:
190:High‑importance
189:
157:
58:
12:
11:
5:
2972:
2970:
2962:
2961:
2956:
2951:
2946:
2941:
2936:
2931:
2926:
2921:
2916:
2906:
2905:
2901:
2900:
2877:
2875:
2874:
2873:
2872:
2871:
2870:
2838:
2837:
2836:
2835:
2786:
2785:
2784:
2783:
2782:
2781:
2754:
2753:
2752:
2751:
2750:
2749:
2682:will be logged
2665:
2664:
2663:
2662:
2648:
2615:
2609:
2608:
2604:
2603:
2598:
2588:
2586:
2582:
2564:
2563:
2535:
2533:
2530:
2522:
2521:
2520:
2519:
2518:
2488:
2487:
2484:
2481:
2478:
2470:
2467:
2442:
2441:
2440:
2439:
2438:
2437:
2436:
2435:
2434:
2433:
2432:
2431:
2430:
2429:
2361:
2360:
2327:
2326:
2325:
2324:
2316:
2312:
2308:
2304:
2301:
2285:
2284:
2283:
2282:
2246:
2245:
2231:User:Lajmmoore
2204:
2201:
2200:
2199:
2168:
2165:
2160:
2159:
2144:
2143:
2131:
2130:
2118:
2117:
2105:
2104:
2103:
2102:
2101:
2100:
2099:
2098:
2077:
2076:
2045:
2044:
2043:
2042:
2036:
2035:
2017:
2014:
2013:
2012:
1999:
1998:
1982:
1981:
1968:
1967:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1948:
1941:
1940:
1931:
1928:
1927:
1926:
1925:
1924:
1923:
1922:
1909:
1908:
1903:
1902:
1887:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1882:
1881:
1880:
1849:
1848:
1831:
1830:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1802:
1799:
1793:
1792:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1774:
1760:
1739:
1738:
1714:
1713:
1700:
1699:
1687:
1686:
1674:
1673:
1661:
1660:
1648:
1647:
1630:
1619:
1596:
1595:
1579:
1578:
1576:
1575:
1570:
1565:
1559:
1556:
1555:
1551:
1550:
1548:
1547:
1545:External links
1542:
1537:
1531:
1528:
1527:
1521:
1512:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1491:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1454:. Many thanks
1396:
1393:
1378:They are here.
1373:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1294:
1291:
1288:
1277:
1276:
1262:
1259:
1248:
1206:
1205:
1195:
1192:
1189:
1185:
1184:
1174:
1171:
1168:
1164:
1163:
1153:
1148:
1145:
1141:
1140:
1130:
1127:
1124:
1120:
1119:
1109:
1106:
1103:
1099:
1098:
1096:
1086:
1083:
1079:
1078:
1068:
1066:
1063:
1059:
1058:
1048:
1045:
1042:
1038:
1037:
1034:
1031:
1028:
1022:Stowe Gardens
1015:
1012:
1011:
1010:
995:will be logged
958:
957:
956:
955:
922:
916:
915:
911:
910:
905:
895:
893:
890:
889:
888:
887:
886:
885:
884:
883:
881:
769:
768:
767:
766:
765:
764:
668:
667:
666:
665:
655:
621:
615:
614:
610:
609:
604:
594:
592:
588:
570:
569:
541:
539:
536:
517:
514:
494:
491:
476:
475:
467:
464:
461:
460:
457:
456:
453:
452:
450:
423:
411:
410:
398:
386:
385:
382:
381:
374:Mid-importance
370:
364:
363:
361:
344:the discussion
331:
330:
327:England portal
314:
302:
301:
299:Mid‑importance
293:
281:
280:
277:
276:
265:
259:
258:
256:
239:the discussion
222:
221:
205:
193:
192:
184:
172:
171:
165:
154:
140:
139:
130:
120:
119:
78:
66:
65:
50:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2971:
2960:
2957:
2955:
2952:
2950:
2947:
2945:
2942:
2940:
2937:
2935:
2932:
2930:
2927:
2925:
2922:
2920:
2917:
2915:
2912:
2911:
2909:
2895:
2882:
2879:
2869:
2865:
2861:
2855:
2848:
2844:
2843:
2842:
2841:
2840:
2839:
2834:
2830:
2826:
2822:
2815:
2810:
2809:
2808:
2804:
2800:
2794:
2788:
2787:
2780:
2776:
2772:
2768:
2764:
2760:
2759:
2758:
2757:
2756:
2755:
2748:
2744:
2740:
2735:
2731:
2727:
2723:
2722:
2721:
2720:
2719:
2715:
2711:
2707:
2701:
2696:
2695:
2694:
2691:
2687:
2683:
2679:
2675:
2671:
2660:
2656:
2653:: Please see
2652:
2649:
2647:
2643:
2640:
2639:
2637:
2631:
2630:
2629:Stowe Gardens
2625:
2621:
2620:
2613:
2602:
2599:
2597:
2593:
2590:
2589:
2585:
2583:
2581:
2577:
2573:
2569:
2562:
2560:
2556:
2552:
2548:
2543:
2537:
2536:
2531:
2526:
2517:
2513:
2509:
2508:Chiswick Chap
2505:
2504:
2503:
2502:
2501:
2500:
2496:
2492:
2485:
2482:
2479:
2476:
2475:
2474:
2468:
2466:
2462:
2458:
2450:
2446:
2428:
2424:
2420:
2416:
2412:
2411:
2410:
2406:
2402:
2398:
2397:
2396:
2392:
2388:
2383:
2379:
2378:
2377:
2373:
2369:
2365:
2364:
2363:
2362:
2359:
2355:
2351:
2350:Chiswick Chap
2347:
2346:
2345:
2344:
2343:
2342:
2341:
2340:
2336:
2332:
2322:
2321:Chiswick Chap
2317:
2313:
2309:
2305:
2302:
2299:
2298:
2297:
2296:
2295:
2293:
2289:
2281:
2277:
2273:
2269:
2266:
2265:
2264:
2260:
2256:
2252:
2248:
2247:
2244:
2240:
2236:
2232:
2228:
2227:Jeremy Musson
2224:
2220:
2216:
2212:
2211:
2210:
2209:
2202:
2198:
2194:
2190:
2189:Chiswick Chap
2185:
2184:
2183:
2182:
2178:
2174:
2173:Chiswick Chap
2166:
2164:
2163:
2158:
2146:
2145:
2133:
2132:
2120:
2119:
2107:
2106:
2095:
2094:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2083:
2081:
2080:
2079:
2078:
2074:
2071:
2068:
2065:
2062:
2059:
2056:
2052:
2051:
2047:
2046:
2040:
2039:
2038:
2037:
2033:
2029:
2025:
2024:
2020:
2019:
2015:
2001:
2000:
1996:
1995:WP:NOTCATALOG
1984:
1983:
1970:
1969:
1965:
1953:
1952:
1945:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1938:
1934:
1933:
1929:
1920:
1916:
1915:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1910:
1905:
1904:
1901:
1889:
1888:
1879:
1875:
1871:
1870:Chiswick Chap
1867:
1866:
1865:
1864:
1863:
1859:
1855:
1851:
1850:
1847:
1843:
1839:
1838:Chiswick Chap
1835:
1834:
1833:
1832:
1819:
1818:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1803:
1800:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1794:
1791:
1779:
1778:
1773:
1769:
1765:
1761:
1759:
1755:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1740:
1737:
1733:
1729:
1716:
1715:
1702:
1701:
1689:
1688:
1676:
1675:
1663:
1662:
1650:
1649:
1645:
1633:
1632:
1620:
1618:
1617:
1613:
1610:
1607:
1603:
1602:Chiswick Chap
1600:
1594:
1592:
1588:
1583:
1582:
1574:
1571:
1569:
1566:
1564:
1561:
1560:
1558:
1557:
1552:
1546:
1543:
1541:
1538:
1536:
1533:
1532:
1530:
1529:
1524:
1519:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1499:Chiswick Chap
1489:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1453:
1449:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1439:
1435:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1394:
1392:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1371:
1357:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1304:
1299:
1295:
1292:
1289:
1286:
1285:
1283:
1279:
1278:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1260:
1249:
1237:
1236:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1215:
1196:
1193:
1190:
1187:
1186:
1175:
1172:
1169:
1166:
1165:
1154:
1152:
1149:
1147:GA criteria 6
1146:
1143:
1142:
1131:
1128:
1126:GA criteria 5
1125:
1122:
1121:
1110:
1107:
1105:GA criteria 4
1104:
1101:
1100:
1097:
1087:
1085:GA criteria 3
1084:
1081:
1080:
1069:
1067:
1065:GA criteria 2
1064:
1061:
1060:
1049:
1046:
1044:GA criteria 1
1043:
1041:Well written?
1040:
1039:
1035:
1032:
1029:
1026:
1025:
1019:
1013:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1004:
1000:
996:
992:
988:
984:
980:
976:
972:
968:
964:
954:
950:
947:
946:
944:
938:
937:
936:Stowe Gardens
932:
928:
927:
920:
909:
906:
904:
900:
897:
896:
892:
882:
879:
875:
871:
870:
869:
865:
861:
857:
853:
849:
845:
844:
843:
839:
835:
831:
827:
823:
822:
821:
817:
813:
809:
805:
801:
797:
793:
792:
791:
790:
786:
782:
778:
774:
763:
759:
755:
751:
747:
740:
735:
734:
733:
729:
725:
721:
717:
716:
715:
711:
707:
703:
699:
695:
691:
687:
686:
685:
682:
678:
674:
663:
659:
656:
654:
650:
647:
646:
644:
637:
636:
635:Stowe Gardens
631:
627:
626:
619:
608:
605:
603:
599:
596:
595:
591:
589:
587:
583:
579:
575:
568:
566:
562:
558:
554:
549:
543:
542:
537:
535:
534:
530:
526:
523:
515:
513:
512:
508:
504:
500:
492:
490:
489:
485:
481:
473:
472:
471:
465:
451:
434:
433:
428:
424:
421:
417:
416:
412:
407:
402:
399:
396:
392:
379:
375:
369:
366:
365:
362:
345:
341:
337:
336:
328:
317:
315:
312:
308:
307:
303:
297:
294:
291:
287:
274:
270:
264:
261:
260:
257:
240:
236:
232:
228:
227:
219:
213:
208:
206:
203:
199:
198:
194:
188:
185:
182:
178:
173:
169:
163:
155:
146:
145:
135:
131:
128:
124:
117:
113:
112:
111:Stowe Gardens
107:
103:
100:
99:
97:
93:
92:
87:
83:
82:Stowe Gardens
79:
76:
72:
71:
61:
56:
55:
48:
44:
40:
36:
35:
34:
28:
27:Stowe Gardens
25:
22:
18:
17:
2886:Cite error:
2881:
2831:) (she/her)
2666:
2655:this comment
2650:
2641:
2627:
2623:
2584:
2572:Cielquiparle
2567:
2565:
2558:
2550:
2546:
2541:
2538:
2524:
2489:
2472:
2443:
2328:
2286:
2214:
2207:
2206:
2170:
2162:
2161:
2156:
2073:
2070:
2067:
2064:
2061:
2058:
2055:
2049:
2048:
2041:Quote to add
2031:
2027:
2022:
2021:
1898:
1788:
1735:
1608:
1598:
1597:
1584:
1573:Instructions
1513:
1470:Murgatroyd49
1448:Murgatroyd49
1434:Murgatroyd49
1416:Murgatroyd49
1401:Murgatroyd49
1398:
1375:
1297:
1209:
1150:
1017:
1001:, so please
990:
959:
948:
934:
930:
891:
771:
669:
657:
648:
642:
633:
629:
590:
573:
571:
564:
556:
552:
547:
544:
519:
496:
477:
469:
430:
373:
333:
268:
231:Horticulture
224:
168:WikiProjects
109:
105:
102:Did you know
101:
91:Did you know
89:
81:
80:A fact from
52:
43:please do so
31:
30:
26:
2688:; consider
1587:transcluded
1452:Template:Rp
1151:too many???
1144:Illustrated
671:Created by
662:Stowe House
116:Elizabeth I
96:check views
2908:Categories
2659:this reply
2624:(pictured)
2016:References
1732:WP:PRIMARY
1540:Authorship
1526:GA toolbox
1062:Verifiable
1036:Complete?
931:(pictured)
698:WP:DYKCRIT
630:(pictured)
106:(pictured)
37:under the
2894:help page
2771:Lajmmoore
2739:Lajmmoore
2734:this link
2730:This link
2700:Lajmmoore
2670:Lajmmoore
2491:Lajmmoore
2452:possible?
2419:Lajmmoore
2387:Lajmmoore
2323:'s issue.
2288:Lajmmoore
2268:Lajmmoore
2255:Lajmmoore
1854:Lajmmoore
1764:Lajmmoore
1734:at that.
1599:Reviewer:
1563:Templates
1554:Reviewing
1490:GA Review
1456:Lajmmoore
1420:Lajmmoore
1382:Lajmmoore
1348:Lajmmoore
1334:Lajmmoore
1320:Lajmmoore
1306:Lajmmoore
1220:Lajmmoore
979:Lajmmoore
963:Lajmmoore
848:Lajmmoore
834:Lajmmoore
777:Lajmmoore
739:Lajmmoore
724:Lajmmoore
694:Lajmmoore
673:Lajmmoore
525:Lajmmoore
503:Lajmmoore
480:Lajmmoore
235:Gardening
86:Main Page
2829:contribs
2763:TSventon
2690:watching
2642:Reviewed
2568:promoted
2028:Dialogue
2011:suffice.
1728:WP:UNDUE
1629:Comments
1612:contribs
1568:Criteria
1497:Passed.
1446:Thanks @
949:Reviewed
874:TSventon
860:contribs
826:TSventon
812:contribs
796:TSventon
781:TSventon
754:contribs
720:TSventon
706:TSventon
649:Reviewed
574:rejected
432:inactive
406:inactive
158:GA-class
47:reassess
2860:Bruxton
2814:Bruxton
2799:Bruxton
2726:Bruxton
2710:Bruxton
2651:Comment
2592:Comment
2413:Hello @
2380:Hello @
2249:Hello @
2167:Summary
1414:Hello @
1123:Stable?
1102:Neutral
1033:Sources
899:Comment
876:& @
872:Hello @
862:) (she/
814:) (she/
756:) (she/
718:Thanks
658:Comment
598:Comment
376:on the
349:England
340:England
296:England
271:on the
88:in the
2661:today.
2307:share;
1947:above.
1930:Images
969:) and
702:WP:DYK
164:scale.
54:Review
2032:Views
1589:from
1030:Notes
1027:Topic
1003:watch
985:) at
828:and @
2864:talk
2825:talk
2803:talk
2775:talk
2767:here
2743:talk
2714:talk
2674:talk
2596:view
2576:talk
2512:talk
2495:talk
2461:talk
2457:KJP1
2423:talk
2415:KJP1
2405:talk
2401:KJP1
2391:talk
2382:KJP1
2372:talk
2368:KJP1
2354:talk
2335:talk
2331:KJP1
2292:here
2276:talk
2272:KJP1
2259:talk
2251:KJP1
2239:talk
2235:KJP1
2193:talk
2177:talk
1874:talk
1858:talk
1842:talk
1768:talk
1754:talk
1750:KJP1
1746:This
1730:and
1606:talk
1503:talk
1474:talk
1460:talk
1438:talk
1424:talk
1405:talk
1386:talk
1352:talk
1338:talk
1324:talk
1310:talk
1282:KJP1
1270:talk
1266:KJP1
1224:talk
1214:KJP1
991:Note
983:talk
975:talk
971:KJP1
967:talk
903:view
864:they
856:talk
838:talk
816:they
808:talk
785:talk
775:(cc
758:they
750:talk
728:talk
710:talk
677:talk
602:view
582:talk
529:talk
507:talk
484:talk
263:High
233:and
2684:at
2626:at
2594:or
2570:by
2553:or
2215:why
2091:189
2087:101
933:at
901:or
632:at
600:or
576:by
559:or
368:Mid
114:is
108:at
49:it.
2910::
2896:).
2890::4
2866:)
2827:•
2805:)
2777:)
2769:.
2745:)
2716:)
2644::
2587:(
2578:)
2549:,
2514:)
2497:)
2463:)
2425:)
2407:)
2393:)
2374:)
2356:)
2337:)
2278:)
2261:)
2241:)
2195:)
2179:)
2072:,
2066:,
2060:,
1876:)
1860:)
1844:)
1770:)
1756:)
1614:)
1505:)
1476:)
1462:)
1440:)
1426:)
1407:)
1388:)
1354:)
1340:)
1326:)
1312:)
1298:do
1272:)
1226:)
1218:?
989:.
951::
894:(
866:)
858:•
840:)
818:)
810:•
787:)
760:)
752:•
730:)
712:)
704:.
651::
638:?
593:(
584:)
555:,
531:)
509:)
501:.
486:)
63:).
2862:(
2856::
2852:@
2823:(
2816::
2812:@
2801:(
2795::
2791:@
2773:(
2741:(
2712:(
2702::
2698:@
2672:(
2606:)
2574:(
2561:.
2510:(
2493:(
2459:(
2421:(
2403:(
2389:(
2370:(
2352:(
2333:(
2319:@
2274:(
2257:(
2237:(
2191:(
2175:(
2153:Y
2140:Y
2127:Y
2114:Y
2075:.
2050:?
2023:?
2008:Y
1991:Y
1977:Y
1960:Y
1896:Y
1872:(
1856:(
1840:(
1826:Y
1786:Y
1766:(
1752:(
1723:Y
1709:Y
1696:Y
1683:Y
1670:Y
1657:Y
1640:Y
1627:Y
1609:·
1604:(
1501:(
1472:(
1458:(
1436:(
1422:(
1403:(
1384:(
1350:(
1336:(
1322:(
1308:(
1268:(
1257:Y
1247:}
1245:Y
1222:(
1216::
1212:@
1203:Y
1182:Y
1161:Y
1138:Y
1129:-
1117:Y
1108:-
1094:Y
1076:Y
1056:Y
1047:-
981:(
973:(
965:(
913:)
854:(
836:(
806:(
794:@
783:(
748:(
741::
737:@
726:(
708:(
683:.
675:(
612:)
580:(
567:.
527:(
505:(
482:(
435:.
408:)
404:(
380:.
275:.
170::
129:.
118:?
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
