131:
includes deliberate attempts to nab and charge anyone. Or so I understand. If you want to pin it down legally, I know at least two lawyer admins who would render an better informed opinion. I'm merely a greying engineer with wide tastes in historical reading! Say the word, and I'll see what they say.
130:
Can't say I follow your 'accused' point, post edit-conflict. Officials acting in good faith can be coloquially 'wrong' but not acting wrongfully— such are 'honest errors' as we all make in day to day life. 'Wrongful accusation' would require some sort of malfeasance or incompetance which of course
81:
Sorry, I read too quickly entering the section edit. Alleged is fine if the facts are in question per the quote. Still, if there is no question on the others, you should be differentiating. OTOH, if these are the same names the press is calling the hi-jackers, and regardless of whether there is a
90:
be in the template at all... the articles should be the arbitor of the point regardless of which label is chosen. 'Alleged' is likely to draw fire from families of victims, whereas I haven't heard anything about
192:
Personally I like "Alleged 9/11 Hijackers" and "Wrongly
Accused", but if you want to ask the lawyer-users for their opinions, that's fine too. btw, wrongly/wrongfully, is one of those better than the other?
21:
Please provide support for the notion that these are "alleged" hijackers -- all of the mainstream media reports describes these people as the hijackers. There's nothing "alleged" about it.
54:
Erroneously
Accused would be less pov. 'Wrongly accused' in US speech generally connotes a deliberate slanderous or libelous attack actionable by lawsuit against the accuser.
31:
There is no trial, and the "mainstream" media has often reported that between 1-7 of the hijacker names are still alive, that identities could have easily been stolen, even
59:
On the above point, in US practice, all accused are alleged until they are convicted unless dead... which should apply in this case to quite a few.
113:
Hrm, I'd rather a word a little more straight-forward than "Erroneously", and "Wrongly
Accused" to me brings forward memories of the likes of
35:
and others have said (pp) "There is no way we can be certain that these were not stolen identities", so it's "alleged" until somebody
117:, convicted through mismanagement or incompetence, but not malice. Is the problem lie perhaps with the "accused", not the "wrongly"?
207:
I removed "reported" from the title. Is there some reason why "reported" was there? Why not just "9/11 Hijackers"?--
22:
171:
137:
101:
67:
208:
194:
154:
118:
114:
40:
230:
226:
222:
167:
133:
97:
63:
233:
211:
197:
176:
142:
121:
106:
72:
43:
25:
225:
suspects", however this link does not appear when implemented (i.e. on the page
161:
falsehood... a wrongful act. My objection stands on it's merit, which is to say
32:
93:
families and persons having their identity stolen have made complaints
165:
has a specific meaning in Law, differentiated from coloquial speech.
95:. Balanced so, I'd go with whatever minimizes space the best.
8:
82:question as to their true identities,
7:
229:). I do not know how to fix this.
217:20th hijacker, link non-functional
14:
234:20:04, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
1:
221:The group title is coded as "
249:
212:02:37, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
198:03:34, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
177:03:25, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
143:03:18, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
122:03:10, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
107:03:18, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
73:03:01, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
44:23:43, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
26:22:28, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
88:and need not necessarily
86:belongs in the article,
157:example involves
23:Morton devonshire
240:
174:
140:
104:
70:
61:Best regards //
248:
247:
243:
242:
241:
239:
238:
237:
219:
172:
138:
102:
68:
51:
49:Wrongly accused
19:
12:
11:
5:
246:
244:
218:
215:
205:
204:
203:
202:
201:
200:
184:
182:
181:
180:
179:
155:David Milgaard
148:
147:
146:
145:
125:
124:
115:David Milgaard
110:
109:
79:
50:
47:
30:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
245:
236:
235:
232:
228:
227:20th hijacker
224:
223:20th hijacker
216:
214:
213:
210:
199:
196:
191:
190:
189:
188:
187:
186:
185:
178:
175:
170:
169:
164:
160:
156:
152:
151:
150:
149:
144:
141:
136:
135:
129:
128:
127:
126:
123:
120:
116:
112:
111:
108:
105:
100:
99:
94:
89:
85:
80:
77:
76:
75:
74:
71:
66:
65:
60:
56:
55:
48:
46:
45:
42:
38:
34:
28:
27:
24:
16:
220:
209:Jersey Devil
206:
183:
166:
162:
158:
132:
96:
92:
87:
83:
62:
58:
57:
53:
52:
36:
29:
20:
39:otherwise.
33:Porter Goss
159:deliberate
195:Sherurcij
119:Sherurcij
41:Sherurcij
231:LukeSurl
163:wrongful
78:revised
17:Alleged
37:proves
153:Your
84:THAT
173:nkB
168:Fra
139:nkB
134:Fra
103:nkB
98:Fra
69:nkB
64:Fra
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.