Knowledge

Template talk:Cite journal/Archive 2009 April

Source 📝

175:. Many citation styles do not denote page numbers this way in serialized content (where a page range is expected for most references), but do label the page range for book citations (where page numbers are often not required). -- 108:
Are there any plans to add the (newer) "PMCID" numbers to this template? Or, should we just use the "pmid" tag for now? NCBI is heading towards using PMCIDs only, I believe, so we should take this into account. (see:
33:
This template does no seem to support archiving for URLs (i.e. archiveurl and archivedate are not listed as parameters). Since it supports URLs, is there any reason why support for archiving should not be added?
88:
parameters such as (although it can be duplicated with other parameters), so still neither templates are ideal. Maybe there should be a standard set of all-inclusive parameters for all citation templates. --
344: 335: 343:
amends pages using a mixture of 'Cite xxx' and 'Citation' templates so that only one family of templates is used. I would welcome comments on this suggestion
198: 191: 273:
Ok, but is there a reason to leave the template the way it is? What is ps for? It's not documented here or at the base template
17: 50:
for magazine and journal references where an archive webpage exists, since I cannot include that information with
127:
Oops. Never mind. I see there already is a "pmc" tag. I was searching for "pmcid" and didn't notice the "pmc". --
364: 318: 292: 288: 277: 268: 241: 237: 210: 184: 172: 165: 136: 121: 95: 63: 40: 161: 82: 206: 358: 312: 262: 180: 151: 132: 117: 59: 340: 284: 233: 72: 158: 202: 91: 35: 157:
generates "p." or "pp." automatically for page numbers, whilst this template doesn't?
354: 348: 308: 302: 258: 252: 176: 128: 113: 55: 224:
section. It seems like an extra dot is added after the closing quotation mark.
251:- just leave it blank after the equals. That should remove the final period. 110: 220:
Well, not sure about this, but please take a look at the
46:
I support this suggestion. I have resorted to using
201:is now open. All users are invited to participate. 228:"So your quote can end up looking like this!". 68:Same here, but then I run into the problem of 8: 197:People may be interested to know that the 199:Poll on date autoformatting and linking 192:Poll on date autoformatting and linking 329:Automatic detection of citation format 248: 7: 147:Is there any particular reason why 143:Page/pages p. pp. etc - a question 24: 232:Doesn't look right to me anyway. 1: 380: 365:20:03, 13 April 2009 (UTC) 319:20:04, 13 April 2009 (UTC) 211:17:26, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 185:23:59, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 166:23:47, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 137:06:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 122:05:58, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 96:23:20, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 64:01:43, 18 March 2009 (UTC) 41:20:58, 17 March 2009 (UTC) 18:Template talk:Cite journal 293:20:10, 4 April 2009 (UTC) 269:17:32, 4 April 2009 (UTC) 242:08:03, 4 April 2009 (UTC) 171:This was brought up on 78:not supporting certain 173:Template talk:Citation 216:Extra dot after quote 29:Support for archiving 362: 316: 301:Now documented. 266: 371: 352: 306: 282: 276: 256: 250: 223: 156: 150: 87: 81: 77: 71: 53: 52:{{cite journal}} 49: 38: 379: 378: 374: 373: 372: 370: 369: 368: 331: 280: 274: 221: 218: 195: 154: 148: 145: 106: 85: 79: 75: 69: 51: 47: 36: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 377: 375: 330: 327: 324: 323: 322: 321: 296: 295: 271: 230: 229: 217: 214: 194: 189: 188: 187: 144: 141: 140: 139: 105: 102: 101: 100: 99: 98: 30: 27: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 376: 367: 366: 363: 360: 356: 350: 346: 342: 338: 337: 328: 326: 320: 317: 314: 310: 304: 300: 299: 298: 297: 294: 290: 286: 279: 278:Citation/core 272: 270: 267: 264: 260: 254: 246: 245: 244: 243: 239: 235: 227: 226: 225: 215: 213: 212: 208: 204: 200: 193: 190: 186: 182: 178: 174: 170: 169: 168: 167: 164: 163: 160: 153: 142: 138: 134: 130: 126: 125: 124: 123: 119: 115: 111: 103: 97: 94: 93: 84: 74: 67: 66: 65: 61: 57: 45: 44: 43: 42: 39: 28: 26: 19: 351: 341:Citation bot 334: 332: 325: 305: 285:Ham Pastrami 255: 234:Ham Pastrami 231: 219: 196: 162: 146: 107: 90: 83:cite journal 48:{{cite web}} 32: 25: 159:Bencherlite 347:. Thanks, 203:Lightmouse 152:cite book 92:OlEnglish 37:Skomorokh 355:Smith609 336:proposed 309:Smith609 259:Smith609 177:Karnesky 129:Thorwald 114:Thorwald 73:cite web 56:Easchiff 333:I have 349:Martin 303:Martin 253:Martin 222:quote= 339:that 112:). -- 104:PMCID 16:< 359:Talk 345:here 313:Talk 289:talk 263:Talk 249:|ps= 247:Use 238:talk 207:talk 181:talk 133:talk 118:talk 60:talk 357:– 311:– 291:) 283:. 281:}} 275:{{ 261:– 240:) 209:) 183:) 155:}} 149:{{ 135:) 120:) 86:}} 80:{{ 76:}} 70:{{ 62:) 54:. 361:) 353:( 315:) 307:( 287:( 265:) 257:( 236:( 205:( 179:( 131:( 116:( 58:(

Index

Template talk:Cite journal
Skomorokh
20:58, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Easchiff
talk
01:43, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
cite web
cite journal
OlEnglish
23:20, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Thorwald
talk
05:58, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Thorwald
talk
06:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
cite book
Bencherlite

23:47, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Template talk:Citation
Karnesky
talk
23:59, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Poll on date autoformatting and linking
Poll on date autoformatting and linking
Lightmouse
talk
17:26, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.