911:. There was another nomination there too; it's article talk page displays the same "!" message. So, as we can all see, the template "!" message is harmless. It doesn't distract Legobot. I believe the warning it gives is appropriate, as it give editors a chance to change their mind before really keeping that category. And in your case, I recommend instead the "Media and drama" subtopic: the first sub-subtopic is people in the media such as "Actors, directors, models, performers, and celebrities"; I hope you'll agree she belongs there. Let me know if this helps; or if you have further thoughts. Good luck on the GAN.
1084:
46:
560:
1031:
606:
483:
678:}}; this template doesn't automatically do that itself. The line you're talking about is used as a reminder line about how to fix the nomination if it isn't completed properly. Next, the "change this line" example is improperly escaped, making it hard to see what you're requesting. Also, you changed the number of tildes in the "nominator=" section; this is correct to synchronize with {{
21:
1179:
710:
907:, thanks for raising this as a possible issue. You're right; the template displays a "!" in a triangle followed by an error message, warning that the subtopic parameter is not being called or it is being called with a blank parameter. Fortunately, we see that Legobot was able to pick up the nomination and place it into the
1062:). However, inputting "Sports" into the "subtopic" field still causes the template to generate "is currently a Sports and recreation good article nominee". This should be updated so "Sports" and "Recreation" generate "is currently a Sports good article nominee" and "is currently a Recreation good article nominee". Thanks,
771:, I'm so sorry no one ever answered you, I only just now noticed this. Yes, I see what you mean about this wording. A couple of things, the second one will surprise you, but the first is a question: What exactly do you suggest the new wording actually be? All I can think of is "approximately seven days", as the
1149:
It's a pity that "sports and recreation" and "sport and recreation" still have to be valid keywords despite now being ambiguous, but I've no doubt they'll continue to be used for a while so I don't think it's practical to try to retire them. I would assume you can take these same keywords and fix up
775:
do suggest a guideline of about seven days (even if, as you said, that can certainly be changed by the reviewer on a case-by-case basis, but seven is the suggested default). Now, I took a look at the template and found an undocumented feature: The reviewer (or anyone) can change the number of days
434:
Watching the talk page doesn't help much with noticing the review if bot edits are hidden in a watchlist, as the only non-bot changes are the status edits by reviewer, so that once you didn't check the talk page edit by unknown editor with no edit summary you get a chance to notice that nomination
406:
The idea is: as long as the start of review is easy to miss and the changes to review subpage are not shown in talk page, I wanted to add "watch the review" link to this template. This would allow all the interested editors to start watching the review even before it has actually started, so that
786:
template that appears on the talk page by adding a "time" parameter to the template. For example, like this: "{{GA nominee ... |time=approximately seven days}}" or this: "{{GA nominee ... |time=8.75 milliseconds}}". Any phrase may be entered and the default is obviously "seven days". What do you
835:
Like I said, I found it by taking a look at the template. Your edit to the documentation looks good; I improved it a bit by moving it to the end of the list of parameters, moving it away from the list of possible values of the status= parameter, and included the default value. Best,
1205:
We've had a couple of instances where a nominator who is unfamiliar with GA clicks on "start review", thinking that's how the process works. If the user creating the review page is the same as the user in the 'nominator' parameter, can we display an error message to the user?
685:
That said, given that a) this template isn't actually protected (thus I can fulfil the request without template-editor or admin rights), b) the line in question won't show in almost any use of the template, c) the change you're trying to suggest is correct and useful (based on
884:
GA nom I left the parameter blank‍—‌per the instructions (for miscellaneous noms). However, this throws what appears to be an error. I tried removing the subtopic parameter completely and the same error is thrown. Please advise. Ping me back!
650:
That would automatically create the proper signature and time stamp. I am a template editor and normally I would do this myself, but I am afraid the syntax may be off a little. I would be afraid I'd screw up such an important template.
820:
etc. Anyway, I would say we should probably put along with "approx seven days" something like "or any reasonable time specified by the reviewer". Also, add about the |time field and instruct them to use it.
1137:
I can't be certain how the template works; I maintain
ChristieBot, which maintains the GAN page, but I haven't dealt with the subtopic page directly. Within ChristieBot I broke up the keywords like so:
1007:
is transcluded on a talk page, there's a link with the text "reply" which returns a client error when I click on it, asking me to reply in source mode. I think this should be removed altogether. ~ 🦝
261:
does not exist because it is an error category: its purpose is to highlight malformed nominations, hence it is better to keep it as a redlink. Ideally the category should be empty.
1094:. I'm not fully aware of the nuances of the template so I'm not comfortable doing it myself, but as a starting point from what I can see it could look something like this:
1059:
787:
think? Now that we know about this, maybe the documentation should be edited instead of the template? Maybe you would like to do the honors? The documentation is here:
346:
I assume that the parameter exists just so that you can leave a note to the next guy that edits the template. I don't know what kind of note you'd leave, though.
750:
139:
shows the same thing in its second example - the template's "status" field is blank, yet the template displayed says the status is "on review"? Thanks,
576:
is not required for edits to unprotected pages, or pending changes protected pages. Try using the template sandbox to test the new code and ask at
931:
Do you think that there should be a parameter for nominator2 if 2 people are working on it? This is most commonly used in FAs, but for example in
1226:
1163:
257:
primarily applies to article space. Editing templates which could be used in multiple articles should be done with more care. In this case
181:
Is there any reason we still have the GAN error category transcluded in the template? It doesn't exist anymore and is only on two pages (
1222:
1159:
135:, that added the GA nominee template to a talk page, made the template box show that the article is being reviewed (when it isn't)? The
63:
295:
241:
208:
403:
I nearly implemented the "watch the review" link in the template when I understood that this feature is potentially controversial.
954:
I have removed the introduction of italics on the nominator sig; they are not needed, and the sig should be left intact. Thanks.
577:
979:
422:
Won't make the slightest difference. Anyone not watching the article's talk page is unlikely to be interested in the review.
27:
662:
940:
727:
701:
407:
once the subpage is created, the more significant amount of watchlist traffic would attract the attention. Comments? —
182:
453:
Don't see any harm. I occasionally watch a review before it is created so it would be a small help to me at least.
426:
331:
The documentation lists a "note" parameter, but this parameter does nothing. Is this intentional? Just curious. --
31:
1060:
Knowledge talk:Good article nominations/Archive 28#Proposal to Split Sports and
Recreation into Seven Sub-Topics
72:
753:, we very well know that putting it on hold could be for any time period, shouldn't this wording be altered? -
1218:
1155:
1069:
1037:
788:
612:
571:
489:
136:
859:
826:
758:
364:
310:
289:
263:
235:
202:
109:
969:
I don't particularly care either way, but that part isn't a sig tag, it contains one, but it isn't one.
959:
892:
583:
544:
423:
1091:
674:
You have a few things confused here. First off, the datestamp is already automatically created, by {{
518:
1012:
1004:
916:
881:
841:
796:
780:
358:
186:
1214:
1151:
1120:
1064:
975:
564:
536:
440:
412:
336:
258:
78:
1128:
1110:
855:
822:
817:
768:
754:
658:
464:
283:
229:
196:
542:
template), so that its talk page's templates refer to it in the same way. Thanks in advance.
1189:
987:
955:
904:
888:
724:
698:
92:
After the subpage is created, the template should by default contain a link to the subpage.
74:
45:
382:
166:
158:
144:
1008:
983:
912:
837:
792:
772:
348:
254:
97:
524:? I envisage that it would be used when the article's title has been altered somehow (
971:
908:
813:
436:
408:
378:
332:
1124:
1106:
687:
679:
675:
653:
454:
20:
1213:. Could this be done by this template when the review page is created, instead?
1186:
936:
721:
717:
695:
691:
76:
1230:
1194:
1167:
1132:
1114:
1076:
1016:
992:
963:
944:
932:
920:
897:
863:
845:
830:
800:
762:
668:
590:
552:
467:
444:
429:
416:
390:
372:
340:
314:
303:
267:
249:
216:
170:
162:
148:
140:
113:
101:
1209:
Also, ChristieBot now adds nominator information to the review page -- e.g.
805:
Took a while to remember and get a hold of what you said. Hmm. I've updated
93:
682:}}, but you should have explained why you're changing it in the nomination.
1141:
Sports: "sports and recreation", "sports", "sport and recreation", "sport"
640:{{tlp|GA nominee|2=''insert date here''{{!}}nominator={{{nominator|~~~~}}}
1123:
since it appears they might be able to help with this (if not, sorry!).
514:
parameter please be added to this template, the same way it has been to
743:"...Recommendations have been left on the review page, and editors
1144:
Recreation: "recreation", "everydaylife", "everyday life", "games"
222:
On second thought, I decided to be bold and made the change. ~
131:
It's possible I'm missing something obvious here, but how come
1025:
600:
477:
79:
39:
15:
816:
right? There might be other linked and lesser templates like
809:. I'm also curious as to how you found out this secret field.
647:{{tlp|GA nominee|2=~~~~~{{!}}nominator={{{nominator|~~~}}}
1150:
the subtopic page, but as I said above I can't be sure.
880:
Hi. I do not see a subtopic for
Biographies, so for the
1210:
806:
154:
132:
125:
30:
discussions and keep related topics together, several
377:
GA bot uses it; leave a note and it will be left on
1058:"Sports and recreation" was recently split up (see
812:If we've to change anything, it probably has to be
1090:This request will actually need to be handled at
876:subtopic throws error in spite of instructions
741:When the status is on hold, it currently says
435:has failed without you noticing it at all. —
8:
1100:|parks|amusements|toys|recreation=Recreation
633:I would like to suggest a minor code tweak:
751:Knowledge talk:Good article nominations/FAQ
690:}}), I'm going to go make this change. --
474:Request for a |display_title= parameter
935:both me and Samtar are working on it.
950:Italics not appropriate to add to sig
850:Oh, see what you mean. I found that "
161:, so no need for a response here. :)
7:
272:Apologies. I was, you might say,
14:
1177:
1082:
1029:
708:
604:
558:
481:
44:
19:
578:Knowledge:WikiProject Templates
308::-) (Puns are always welcome.)
1:
1017:22:15, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
864:19:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
846:15:58, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
831:10:39, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
801:03:14, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
171:04:43, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
149:02:17, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
993:19:30, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
964:19:05, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
945:10:34, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
854:" part in the template now.
763:15:01, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
669:07:14, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
1052:to reactivate your request.
1040:has been answered. Set the
747:to address these issues..."
627:to reactivate your request.
615:has been answered. Set the
591:19:36, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
553:19:18, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
504:to reactivate your request.
492:has been answered. Set the
1246:
391:09:22, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
373:17:18, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
341:14:00, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
921:23:17, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
898:21:43, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
580:if you get stuck. Best —
468:08:41, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
445:16:25, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
430:05:49, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
417:05:42, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
315:05:51, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
304:04:11, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
268:20:14, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
250:01:30, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
217:01:19, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
34:talk pages redirect here.
1231:14:31, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
1201:Two enhancement requests
1195:02:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
1168:23:24, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
1133:19:40, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
1115:00:47, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
1077:17:30, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
720:12:22, 31 October 2014 (
694:12:19, 31 October 2014 (
114:17:48, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
102:12:12, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
789:Template:GA nominee/doc
183:Talk:1971–72_NBA_season
137:template documentation
852:{{{time|seven days}}}
1098:|sport|sports=Sports
1092:Template:GA/Subtopic
1005:Template:GA nominee
882:Talk:Caitlyn Jenner
437:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
409:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
187:Talk:Freddy Krueger
909:miscellaneous list
776:displaying in the
259:Category:GAN error
1072:
1056:
1055:
999:Remove reply link
818:Template:GANotice
737:"On hold" wording
666:
636:Change this line:
631:
630:
508:
507:
302:
248:
215:
155:Question answered
124:(Cross post from
107:Good idea: done.
85:
84:
38:
37:
1237:
1185:
1181:
1180:
1101:
1086:
1085:
1075:
1070:
1067:
1047:
1043:
1033:
1032:
1026:
991:
896:
785:
779:
712:
711:
667:
656:
622:
618:
608:
607:
601:
597:Suggested change
586:
585:Mr. Stradivarius
575:
562:
561:
547:
541:
535:
523:
517:
513:
499:
495:
485:
484:
478:
462:
371:
370:
367:
361:
354:
298:
292:
286:
280:
279:
244:
238:
232:
226:
225:
211:
205:
199:
193:
192:
80:
48:
40:
23:
16:
1245:
1244:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1203:
1192:
1191:it has begun...
1178:
1176:
1097:
1083:
1066:« Gonzo fan2007
1065:
1063:
1045:
1041:
1030:
1024:
1003:Currently when
1001:
970:
952:
943:
929:
886:
878:
783:
777:
773:GA Instructions
745:have seven days
739:
709:
652:
648:
641:
620:
616:
605:
599:
584:
569:
559:
545:
539:
533:
521:
515:
512:|display_title=
511:
497:
493:
482:
476:
456:
401:
365:
359:
356:
349:
347:
329:
327:note parameter?
296:
290:
284:
277:
242:
236:
230:
223:
209:
203:
197:
190:
179:
159:User:Apterygial
157:on GAN talk by
122:
120:Template issue?
90:
88:Feature request
81:
75:
53:
32:GAN subtemplate
12:
11:
5:
1243:
1241:
1202:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1190:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1142:
1103:
1102:
1099:
1095:
1054:
1053:
1034:
1023:
1020:
1000:
997:
996:
995:
951:
948:
939:
928:
925:
924:
923:
877:
874:
873:
872:
871:
870:
869:
868:
867:
866:
810:
738:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
683:
646:
644:
639:
637:
629:
628:
609:
598:
595:
594:
593:
572:edit protected
506:
505:
486:
475:
472:
471:
470:
450:
449:
448:
447:
400:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
328:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
178:
175:
174:
173:
121:
118:
117:
116:
89:
86:
83:
82:
77:
73:
71:
68:
67:
59:
58:
55:
54:
49:
43:
36:
35:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1242:
1233:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1215:Mike Christie
1212:
1207:
1200:
1196:
1193:
1188:
1184:
1175:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1153:
1152:Mike Christie
1148:
1143:
1140:
1139:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1121:Mike Christie
1118:
1117:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1105:
1104:
1096:
1093:
1089:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1073:
1068:
1061:
1051:
1048:parameter to
1039:
1035:
1028:
1027:
1021:
1019:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1006:
998:
994:
989:
985:
981:
977:
973:
968:
967:
966:
965:
961:
957:
949:
947:
946:
942:
938:
934:
926:
922:
918:
914:
910:
906:
902:
901:
900:
899:
894:
890:
883:
875:
865:
861:
857:
853:
849:
848:
847:
843:
839:
834:
833:
832:
828:
824:
819:
815:
811:
808:
804:
803:
802:
798:
794:
790:
782:
774:
770:
767:
766:
765:
764:
760:
756:
752:
748:
746:
736:
729:
726:
723:
719:
715:
706:
705:
703:
700:
697:
693:
689:
684:
681:
677:
673:
672:
671:
670:
664:
660:
655:
645:
638:
634:
626:
623:parameter to
614:
610:
603:
602:
596:
592:
589:
588:
587:
579:
573:
568:
566:
557:
556:
555:
554:
551:
549:
548:
546:It Is Me Here
538:
531:
527:
520:
503:
500:parameter to
491:
487:
480:
479:
473:
469:
466:
463:
461:
460:
452:
451:
446:
442:
438:
433:
432:
431:
428:
425:
421:
420:
419:
418:
414:
410:
404:
398:
392:
389:
386:
385:
380:
376:
375:
374:
368:
362:
355:
353:
345:
344:
343:
342:
338:
334:
326:
316:
313:
312:
307:
306:
305:
301:
299:
293:
287:
275:
271:
270:
269:
266:
265:
260:
256:
253:
252:
251:
247:
245:
239:
233:
221:
220:
219:
218:
214:
212:
206:
200:
188:
184:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
153:
152:
151:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
129:
127:
126:GAN talk page
119:
115:
112:
111:
106:
105:
104:
103:
99:
95:
87:
70:
69:
66:
65:
64:GAN/preload 1
61:
60:
57:
56:
52:
47:
42:
41:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1208:
1204:
1182:
1087:
1057:
1049:
1038:edit request
1022:Edit Request
1002:
953:
930:
879:
856:Ugog Nizdast
851:
823:Ugog Nizdast
769:Ugog Nizdast
755:Ugog Nizdast
744:
742:
740:
713:
649:
642:
635:
632:
624:
613:edit request
582:
581:
563:
550:
543:
529:
525:
509:
501:
490:edit request
458:
457:
405:
402:
387:
383:
351:
330:
311:Geometry guy
309:
281:
273:
264:Geometry guy
262:
227:
194:
180:
130:
123:
110:Geometry guy
108:
91:
62:
50:
956:BlueMoonset
905:Checkingfax
889:Checkingfax
519:talk header
1187:* Pppery *
1042:|answered=
1011:(he/him •
933:Watch Dogs
927:nominator2
781:GA nominee
617:|answered=
494:|answered=
399:Watch link
274:seeing red
28:centralise
1009:Shushugah
913:Prhartcom
838:Prhartcom
793:Prhartcom
688:subst:GAN
680:subst:GAN
676:subst:GAN
663:I did it!
659:blah blah
537:lowercase
532:. with a
177:GAN Error
133:this edit
1223:contribs
1160:contribs
1119:Pinging
972:Headbomb
941:Contribs
791:. Best,
643:To this:
565:Not done
510:Could a
427:Fatuorum
333:Fru1tbat
297:contribs
243:contribs
210:contribs
51:Archives
26:To help
1227:library
1164:library
1125:Tollens
1107:Tollens
937:Dat Guy
807:the doc
749:. From
424:Malleus
366:scripts
255:WP:BOLD
1071:(talk)
814:WP:GAI
718:ais523
692:ais523
654:Jeremy
465:(talk)
379:WP:GAN
1088:Note:
1046:|ans=
1036:This
621:|ans=
611:This
498:|ans=
488:This
350:Gary
278:Amory
224:Amory
191:Amory
189:). ~
163:Somno
141:Somno
1219:talk
1211:here
1183:Done
1156:talk
1129:talk
1111:talk
1013:talk
960:talk
917:talk
893:Talk
891:}}Â {
887:{{u|
860:talk
842:talk
827:talk
797:talk
759:talk
716:. --
714:Done
707:And
459:corn
441:talk
413:talk
384:hare
360:talk
352:King
337:talk
291:talk
285:user
276:. ~
237:talk
231:user
204:talk
198:user
185:and
167:talk
145:talk
98:talk
94:Bwrs
1225:-
1162:-
1044:or
903:Hi
619:or
496:or
455:AIR
1229:)
1221:-
1166:)
1158:-
1131:)
1113:)
1074:@
1050:no
1015:)
986:·
982:·
978:·
962:)
919:)
862:)
844:)
829:)
799:)
784:}}
778:{{
761:)
704:)
686:{{
661:•
651:--
625:no
574:}}
570:{{
540:}}
534:{{
522:}}
516:{{
502:no
443:)
415:)
381:.
363:·
339:)
294:•
288:•
240:•
234:•
207:•
201:•
169:)
147:)
128:)
100:)
1217:(
1154:(
1127:(
1109:(
990:}
988:b
984:p
980:c
976:t
974:{
958:(
915:(
895:}
858:(
840:(
825:(
795:(
757:(
730:)
728:C
725:T
722:U
702:C
699:T
696:U
665:)
657:(
567::
530:g
528:.
526:e
439:(
411:(
388:j
369:)
357:(
335:(
300:)
282:(
246:)
228:(
213:)
195:(
165:(
143:(
96:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
