1045:
referencing when they use the term) does not reference "dances of Latin
America" but rather is the name of one of the two main categories of ballroom dance; ballroom is divided into "standard" ballroom (which is alternately known as "smooth" or "classic" ballroom and includes styles such as the waltz, quickstep, foxtrot, and tango) and "latin" ballroom (sometimes, but much less ubiquitously, also known as "rythmic" ballroom; this umbrella includes the cha-cha, samba, rumba, jive, ect.). Standard ballroom dance are generally danced with closer and more rigid frames and mostly developed earlier, in Europe. Latin ballroom styles evolved from the same tradition but the modern dances have radically different forms and are generally danced to more rhythmic music and they are now considered a completely different animal, though both categories are clearly forms of ballroom. The term "Latin" arose and stuck because these styles mostly did originate in Latin America, but they have since spread to become as global a form of dance as ever existed in the world; the name is to some extent a hold-over and there are of course other dances in Latin America which have nothing to do with ballroom. "African-American dance" is not a style or genre in any sense, we just happen to have an article that goes by that name which talks about the significance and history of dance in the African-American experience. So one is the established name of a genre, the other is an ad-hoc (though very much notable worthwhile) topic for an article.
654:
sources to establish definite boundaries between genres and asserting specific dates and relative importance is difficult for even a single genre, let alone judging the importance and level of distinctness of a specific style (emergent, established, or traditional) against all other forms of dance. Complicating the matter further is the fact that much of the limited academia on the subject is deeply affected by the influence of it being so close to the arts. Much of it is so pre-occupied with vague and abstract critical review (which is understandable to an extent, in that obviously we of all people can relate to how difficult it can be to capture dance in words) or else an equally nebulous application of sociological assessment of dance. My observation on the state of the field is that it would benefit from more actual dance
986:
certain entries on the list, but to some degree both terms apply to each of the entries in that section. On the other hand, I don't see any harm in sectioning off the articles for terminology regarding the number of participants; I considered that myself, in fact, but decided against it because it was only five entries, I couldn't come up with a terribly apt label, and it is a social distinction ultimately, so I was happy to leave those entries in that section. But I've no strong objection to that distinction, by any means. I am going to change some of the other elements back, according to the above reasoning and further distinctions which I'll make in my edit summaries. Let me know what you think about the final result.
401:, is focused on dance topics. Recently, the "dance music" entry was removed from See Also and replaced by an entire table row that lists "dance music" genres. Aside from having "dance" in their names, these have nothing to do with dance and therefore do not belong on this template. If this is appropriate then it would also make sense to create another row that lists, for example, all songs that have "dance" in their titles. I propose that: (1) the template be restored so that "dance music" is listed under See Also; and (2) all dance music genres be removed from this template. If it's important to list these genres on a template, they can be added to an appropriate music-oriented template.
816:
them make a particular claim. I think working through local consensus on these issues actually should be pretty easy for now, as there are relatively few of us working on dance articles and there seems to be some degree of agreement (or willingness to compromise on "good enough" solutions) when it comes to genre distinctions. Its later, when more (and possibly less flexible) editors get involved in this area that verifiability could prove a sticking point or a necesity to avoid genre warring.
930:"Social and cultural context" is still a little odd because when we're talking about circle dance vs solo dance etc, we're talking about forms that transcend culture and society...there are circle dances in a variety of cultures, for example, so this isn't really a culture-dependent context. If anything, it's the second group in the navbox that represent specific cultural styles and contexts. It seems to me that there are three groupings for dance, all of which are lazily called "genres":
22:
1055:
wish we had a more robust selection of similar articles to add with it, since it sticks out a bit like a sore thumb. But not only is the miscellaneous section probably the best place for it, but now that you've moved it out of the section it was in, I no longer feel we should be married to keeping "cultural" in the title of that section and we can reference it simply as "social context" since that label is cleaner for just the items left in there.
71:
53:
1444:
1324:
1242:
1286:
672:
should really be at work in an area where subjectivity can creep in. That's exactly why we need a more uniform approach. But sourcing...that's going to be the headache. However we approach this, I want to create a method for avoiding any kind of genre-warring amongst later editors if we succeed in making dance a more robust area of editorial contribution.
1026:
hip-hop, tap, and so on, as they are already represented in group 3. I thought of doing something like
African American (Breaking • Hip-hop • Jazz • Tap), but thought that might be a little cumbersome and hard for the reader to find what they were looking for. At any rate, if "African-American" is problematic, then "Latin" surely is as well.
1369:
1017:. There's one breakdown, "dances by culture", which would include Latin, African-American, Indian, Balkan, etc. and may be too large to include in the navbox. Then there's another breakdown, by social or cultural function, irrespective of specific culture, which I think is closer to how you're using it for our second navbox group.
981:, which you moved back to genre section has nothing to do with any particular style; that article discuses hip-hop, folk, jive, jazz, funk and countless other styles that are only related via cultural linkage. That is, the header is meant to suggest these are articles which treat dance according to its social
1044:
Well "Latin" and "African-American" are not really used in the same way here, as one is an adjective describing a context and the other is the established proper noun/name of a genre. Latin dance (at least the kind of Latin dance spoken of in our article and the type of dance that people are usually
985:
cultural context, not necessarily one or both. There's really no other category to place
African-American dance in the template but there, so the "cultural" pretty much has to stay ("context" alone is way to vague for that and other entries in that section) whereas "social" obviously is more apt for
653:
I'm basically of the same mind, with the additional caveat that not only is basing it on
Wikiproject assessment an issue to maintain on a technical level, it also runs the risk of going into OR territory. This is actually an issue we've been discussing at the page Violas linked to. Finding reliable
1141:
more robust, but I don't want to complicate that article too much now that it's finally looking in increasingly good shape. I'm not sure who is most responsible for that, but it seems like the joint result of efforts from a number of different editors over the last six months; not so long ago, that
1025:
culture. From my biased U.S. viewpoint, I see
African-American dance as an internationally significant family of dance forms that's worthy of inclusion in this navbox. But as those dances have been exported to other cultures, perhaps it makes more sense to break them into the major subdivisions like
1136:
article (as opposed to the awkward, barely encyclopedic list that this term redirects to at present) to make a similar series of distinctions like those made in the lead of that article, so that a thorough explanation of the difficulties in establishign boundaries between dances can be linked to.
1054:
That long-winded diatribe done though, let's try this: I'm going to move the
African-American article to the "See also" section of the template, since you're right that it is "odd-man-out" in the social distinctions section. I think it's too important a topic to omit in its entirety, though I do
815:
I think contextual consensus is probably the only method forward here. Any kind of "rule of thumb" we construct here is unlikely to provide a consistently non-controversial method for delineating boundaries and verifiability is more about what our sources say and how they say it than how many of
671:
for a similar discussion on categories, basing it upon a general sense of the sources, primary and secondary, on the topic. I'm not sure why I never implemented it, except to say I'm sure it was a combination of the tedium of the task and that no one else ever responded again and some consensus
1068:; I can't say as I entirely agree with all of the organizational priorities they applied in their hierarchies, but something had to be done with that mess and as I said I was going to do it nearly a year ago, without ever getting around to it, I'm not really in a position to nit-pick. :)
1142:
article was a mess (at least, relative to its importance) and had a fair bit of original research, weight, and organizational problems. it could still use some polish in the format, but the tone of the current prose is a vast improvement and it strikes me that
741:
538:
Suggestion 1: only include genres rated "high-importance" or "top-importance." (This would be hard to keep track of, especially because Dance has a massive assessment backlog, but would outsource this decision to individual talk pages.)
1190:, it would be nice if there were a top-level article describing set dancing in general. That would be worthy of inclusion, in my opinion. Squares, country dance, quadrilles, etc. are too much variety for this navbox, I'd think.
756:
746:
1020:
For the specific case of "African-American dance", it may be that it doesn't fit into any of these categories. It certainly doesn't fit into the second, as no other article in that group covers dance within the context of a
416:
I agree, its just that they have dance in the title, which is only because of the way in which popular music genre names are created (they tend to be portmanteaus of other genres). They don't really believe on a dance based
751:
736:
732:
We could impose semi-arbitrary cutoffs based on depth of coverage; maybe "If you provide links on this page to 5 published books entirely about the genre in question, you may add it to the list." A dossier for ballet could
254:
545:
Suggestion 3: include all the bluelinked genres we can think of, but organize them more accessibly. (Don't know how this would happen. Maybe each top-importance genre gets a dozen subgenres max?)
977:
Heya, Ibadibam. The logic behind "social and cultural context" was for that section to serve as a cache-all for disparate classifications which are not a matter of genre or style. For example,
948:
kind of reliable source for a theory of dance categorization that takes an intersectional approach (rather than lumping everything into a big list) and haven't found one yet. Will keep looking.
571:, although that list is a mess. I think limiting it to top-level links is smart, but basing it on WikiProject assessment is difficult to maintain. I suggest establishing a local consensus here.
1270:
1352:
936:
Cultural style: What is the "flavor" of the dance? What stylistic elements do the dancers incorporate into their movements? This would include Latin, African-American, Ballroom, etc.
535:. Also, there are several instances of both subgenres and their supergenres present: ballroom + salsa, tango, waltz; folk + circle, line, war; street + hip hop, steppin', krumping.
667:
This issue is important not just in regard to the content of particular articles, but also, obviously, the kind of organizational principle involved here. Note that I drew up a
658:, who would speak to general milestones at length and ideally do so in language plain enough that we could reference them more thoroughly for our encyclopedic purposes here.
1146:
would be an easily notable and very useful article (though verifiability will clearly be a work in progress there as it is here and elsewhere on active dance articles).
483:
The template has been restored to its former state per consensus. As suggested above, it might be logical to list dance music genres on a music-centric template such as
904:
Yeah, I think we need a different label for the first row aside from "types", which is way to vague. "Context" sounds too awkward though... "Social context" maybe?
455:
An entry under "See Also" is fine, but an entire row for "Music" at the same level as "Types", "Genres" and "Technique" does not seem justified to me; a seperate
1205:
No objection here; certainly it would pass GNG without issue. If anyone has any sources in this area, I would be happy to contribute some edits to the prose.
439:
The dance music genres are related & oriented with dance. Their genres have a different setting, like dance-pop is a dance music genre in a pop setting.
542:
Suggestion 2: only include genres which have bluelinked subgenres. (This might still leave us with too many links—see that list of vernacular dances)
1299:
covers it only as a music genre, not as a dance genre. If there is a dance genre with this name, the article should first be expanded to cover it.
360:
263:
370:
939:
Form: What are the technical aspects of the dance? What figures and steps do the dancers use? Circle dance, line dance, partner dance, etc.
1512:
668:
549:
91:
1472:
1274:
1356:
933:
Context: What is the purpose and context of the dance? This classification includes concert dance, war dance, erotic dance, etc.
33:
568:
78:
58:
862:
Agreed. As long as we're all content with mutual common sense, there's no need to worry about fussy criteria. Thanks for
773:
consider important, and the threshold could be adjusted if we find ourselves with too many or to few. On the other hand,
312:
1377:
250:
208:
1013:
I'm beginning to understand! I think we're getting tripped up semantically because of the multiple ways we can use
1450:
1330:
1248:
1064:
BTW, thanks for pointing out that the "dance styles" cat no longer exists. Seems someone has been hard at work in
142:
332:
164:
90:
topics on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1103:
39:
1106:
about this, acknowledging the ambiguities etc. and proposing a detailed organizational scheme. Worth a look.
1409:
630:
625:, all recently active Dance editors. Hi, all! Please allow me to take the opportunity to let you know about
515:
I feel there should be a criterion genres should have to meet for inclusion on this template. If we include
184:
1476:
978:
711:
487:
459:
352:
176:
470:
277:
398:
320:
316:
1420:
1111:
871:
790:
638:
557:
444:
289:
308:
1224:
1165:
1087:
1005:
923:
835:
691:
610:
356:
324:
156:
520:
348:
336:
1304:
1195:
1031:
953:
626:
576:
498:
406:
340:
328:
152:
622:
707:
606:
426:
273:
1492:
1385:
602:
516:
466:
128:
1416:
1107:
867:
786:
634:
598:
553:
440:
281:
246:
228:
168:
770:
1402:
1206:
1147:
1069:
1065:
987:
905:
817:
673:
590:
180:
172:
87:
1506:
1300:
1296:
1191:
1027:
949:
774:
706:
I tend to agree that we can't be asking Wiki editors to make judgments of that kind.
614:
594:
572:
494:
402:
344:
220:
762:
618:
524:
420:
216:
192:
1395:
769:
fails. This test could be a decent, if labor-intensive, indicator of which genres
527:, and even if we did it wouldn't be very fair to give them all equal billing with
1415:. Please notice that individual national dances are not listed on this template.
1487:
1381:
1143:
1133:
299:
285:
200:
196:
188:
766:
204:
70:
52:
302:- specifically verifying that each girl actually started out as a chorine
1497:
1480:
1424:
1405:, which is linked under the section 'Regional', and is on the template
1389:
1360:
1308:
1278:
1226:
1199:
1167:
1115:
1089:
1035:
1007:
957:
925:
875:
837:
794:
715:
693:
642:
580:
561:
532:
502:
474:
448:
432:
410:
224:
528:
160:
1486:
Please be clear exactly where you would like it added. Thank you. --
1269:
Could someone add
Flamenco and categorize Flamenco jazz under it?
1138:
83:
1438:
1318:
1236:
15:
1137:
Alternatively, we could make the "Types of dance" section of
1132:
Kind of makes you think that perhaps we should start with a
633:
which could be considered as a supplement to this template.
548:
Votes? Thoughts? Other suggestions? Should I post this at
781:
seems spot-on enough that I wonder if we could trust to
567:
Your third suggestion is already essentially covered by
1186:
863:
778:
523:
requires we include the fifty-odd other substyles in
765:
barely qualify, hip-hop and ballet pass easily, and
82:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1435:Semi-protected edit request on 20 October 2021
8:
1351:Could someone put Bhangra in this template?
629:, where Snow has lots of great plans, and
115:
47:
493:, but it's clearly inappropriate here.
49:
550:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Dance
371:Category:Dance articles needing images
1471:Could someone add Samba de Gafieira?
1271:2601:C7:C201:C640:5470:F380:A795:9D7F
669:general break-down of genre relations
76:This template is within the scope of
21:
19:
7:
1401:It would be included in the article
1394:How about the fact that it's listed
1353:2601:C7:C201:C640:6488:6115:1CFA:48D
761:With a cutoff of 5, postmodern and
313:Country Western Dance International
38:It is of interest to the following
1285:
525:Street dance#List of street dances
14:
397:This template, which falls under
100:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Dance
1442:
1367:
1322:
1284:
1240:
136:To improve to Featured standard:
69:
51:
20:
1380:to support your edit request.
631:an incubating Dance series box
569:List of dance style categories
1:
627:Talk:Concert dance#Remodeling
562:16:07, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
119:WikiProject Dance To-do list:
94:and see a list of open tasks.
1498:18:08, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
1481:21:14, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
503:03:00, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
475:12:22, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
449:01:41, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
433:17:49, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
411:17:02, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
1465:to reactivate your request.
1453:has been answered. Set the
1345:to reactivate your request.
1333:has been answered. Set the
1263:to reactivate your request.
1251:has been answered. Set the
1104:a quite thorough discussion
260:Substubs needing expansion:
251:List of dance personalities
209:Physically integrated dance
1529:
1513:WikiProject Dance articles
1425:14:27, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
1390:14:22, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
1361:14:19, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
1309:21:02, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
1279:20:40, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
1200:22:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
1168:03:06, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
1116:17:44, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
1090:02:28, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
1036:22:55, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
1008:22:33, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
958:17:51, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
926:21:27, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
876:13:13, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
838:10:04, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
103:Template:WikiProject Dance
1227:04:30, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
944:I've been trying to find
795:05:12, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
752:Ballet in Western Culture
716:23:23, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
694:07:50, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
643:03:57, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
581:19:50, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
333:Post-structuralist ballet
114:
64:
46:
165:Choreography on Broadway
1180:Shapes and participants
185:List of dance companies
979:African-American dance
239:To check for copyvios:
177:Indian classical dance
785:consensus after all.
465:template might be. —
368:Wanted Pics/Graphics:
278:Canada Dance Festival
353:World Dance Alliance
1376:. Please provide a
747:Cambridge companion
589:Good idea. Pinging
325:German folk dancing
297:Needing references:
157:20th century ballet
866:types vs. genres.
393:Dance music genres
153:18th century dance
34:content assessment
1496:
1469:
1468:
1349:
1348:
1267:
1266:
399:wikiproject dance
390:
389:
386:
385:
382:
381:
378:
377:
321:Dance and society
274:Amir Hossain Babu
141:To nominate as a
79:WikiProject Dance
1520:
1490:
1460:
1456:
1446:
1445:
1439:
1414:
1408:
1375:
1371:
1370:
1340:
1336:
1326:
1325:
1319:
1291:
1288:
1287:
1258:
1254:
1244:
1243:
1237:
1220:
1217:
1214:
1211:
1189:
1161:
1158:
1155:
1152:
1083:
1080:
1077:
1074:
1001:
998:
995:
992:
919:
916:
913:
910:
831:
828:
825:
822:
687:
684:
681:
678:
517:Chicago stepping
492:
486:
464:
458:
430:
423:
317:Dance and cinema
116:
108:
107:
104:
101:
98:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
25:
24:
23:
16:
1528:
1527:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1503:
1502:
1458:
1454:
1443:
1437:
1412:
1406:
1378:reliable source
1368:
1366:
1338:
1334:
1323:
1317:
1289:
1256:
1252:
1241:
1235:
1218:
1215:
1212:
1209:
1185:
1182:
1159:
1156:
1153:
1150:
1081:
1078:
1075:
1072:
999:
996:
993:
990:
917:
914:
911:
908:
829:
826:
823:
820:
757:A queer history
742:Apollo's Angels
685:
682:
679:
676:
519:, for example,
513:
490:
484:
462:
456:
421:
419:
395:
282:Dance etiquette
247:List of dancers
229:Lead and follow
169:Dance education
127:To nominate at
105:
102:
99:
96:
95:
12:
11:
5:
1526:
1524:
1516:
1515:
1505:
1504:
1501:
1500:
1467:
1466:
1447:
1436:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1410:Dance in India
1403:Dance in India
1347:
1346:
1327:
1316:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1295:: The article
1265:
1264:
1245:
1234:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1181:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1066:Category:Dance
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1039:
1038:
1018:
975:
974:
973:
972:
971:
970:
969:
968:
967:
966:
965:
964:
963:
962:
961:
960:
942:
941:
940:
937:
934:
889:
888:
887:
886:
885:
884:
883:
882:
881:
880:
879:
878:
849:
848:
847:
846:
845:
844:
843:
842:
841:
840:
804:
803:
802:
801:
800:
799:
798:
797:
759:
754:
749:
744:
739:
734:
723:
722:
721:
720:
719:
718:
699:
698:
697:
696:
662:
661:
660:
659:
648:
647:
646:
645:
611:Macdonald-ross
584:
583:
512:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
478:
477:
452:
451:
436:
435:
394:
391:
388:
387:
384:
383:
380:
379:
376:
375:
374:
373:
365:
309:Broadway dance
303:
294:
268:
257:
255:AfD discussion
241:
236:
231:
211:
181:Italian ballet
173:English ballet
147:
138:
133:
121:
120:
112:
111:
109:
106:Dance articles
92:the discussion
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1525:
1514:
1511:
1510:
1508:
1499:
1494:
1489:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1478:
1474:
1464:
1461:parameter to
1452:
1448:
1441:
1440:
1434:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1411:
1404:
1400:
1399:
1397:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1374:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1344:
1341:parameter to
1332:
1328:
1321:
1320:
1314:
1310:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1297:flamenco jazz
1294:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1262:
1259:parameter to
1250:
1246:
1239:
1238:
1232:
1228:
1225:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1188:
1179:
1169:
1166:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1145:
1140:
1135:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1091:
1088:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1067:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1024:
1019:
1016:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1006:
1004:
1003:
1002:
984:
980:
959:
955:
951:
947:
943:
938:
935:
932:
931:
929:
928:
927:
924:
922:
921:
920:
903:
902:
901:
900:
899:
898:
897:
896:
895:
894:
893:
892:
891:
890:
877:
873:
869:
865:
861:
860:
859:
858:
857:
856:
855:
854:
853:
852:
851:
850:
839:
836:
834:
833:
832:
814:
813:
812:
811:
810:
809:
808:
807:
806:
805:
796:
792:
788:
784:
780:
776:
775:User:Ibadibam
772:
768:
764:
760:
758:
755:
753:
750:
748:
745:
743:
740:
738:
735:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
724:
717:
713:
709:
705:
704:
703:
702:
701:
700:
695:
692:
690:
689:
688:
670:
666:
665:
664:
663:
657:
652:
651:
650:
649:
644:
640:
636:
632:
628:
624:
620:
616:
612:
608:
604:
600:
596:
592:
588:
587:
586:
585:
582:
578:
574:
570:
566:
565:
564:
563:
559:
555:
551:
546:
543:
540:
536:
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
510:
504:
500:
496:
489:
482:
481:
480:
479:
476:
472:
468:
461:
454:
453:
450:
446:
442:
438:
437:
434:
431:
428:
424:
415:
414:
413:
412:
408:
404:
400:
392:
372:
369:
366:
364:
363:
358:
357:Xavier Le Roy
354:
350:
346:
345:Shuffle dance
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
307:
304:
301:
298:
295:
293:
292:
287:
283:
279:
275:
272:
269:
267:
266:
261:
258:
256:
252:
248:
245:
242:
240:
237:
235:
232:
230:
226:
222:
221:Salsa (dance)
218:
215:
212:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
151:
148:
146:
144:
139:
137:
134:
132:
130:
125:
124:
123:
122:
118:
117:
113:
110:
93:
89:
88:Dance-related
85:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
1473:47.36.25.163
1470:
1462:
1451:edit request
1372:
1350:
1342:
1331:edit request
1292:
1268:
1260:
1249:edit request
1208:
1207:
1183:
1149:
1148:
1071:
1070:
1022:
1014:
989:
988:
982:
976:
945:
907:
906:
819:
818:
782:
763:Morris dance
708:Coretheapple
675:
674:
655:
607:Coretheapple
547:
544:
541:
537:
514:
511:Genre issues
467:Robert Greer
418:
396:
367:
361:
349:Swing boogie
337:Push (dance)
305:
296:
290:
270:
264:
259:
243:
238:
233:
217:Contra dance
213:
193:Opera ballet
149:
143:Good article
140:
135:
126:
77:
40:WikiProjects
29:
1293:Partly done
1144:Dance style
1134:Dance style
864:sorting out
603:Robertgreer
488:Dance music
460:Dance music
417:template.--
341:Salon dance
329:Latin swing
300:Chorus line
286:Flash dance
214:To cleanup:
201:Scotch reel
197:Sasha Waltz
1455:|answered=
1417:Randy Kryn
1335:|answered=
1253:|answered=
1184:Regarding
1108:FourViolas
868:FourViolas
787:FourViolas
656:historians
635:FourViolas
599:Poetzinger
554:FourViolas
441:Superastig
306:To create:
271:To destub:
234:To unbias:
189:Meg Stuart
150:To expand:
1187:this edit
767:Lindy hop
591:Snow Rise
521:WP:WEIGHT
265:/substubs
253: as per
244:To merge:
205:Set dance
1507:Category
1373:Not done
1301:Ibadibam
1233:Flamenco
1192:Ibadibam
1028:Ibadibam
1015:cultural
950:Ibadibam
737:Vaganova
615:Mirokado
595:Lambtron
573:Ibadibam
495:Lambtron
403:Lambtron
30:template
1315:Bhangra
1102:EB has
619:Ipigott
533:Hip hop
422:SabreBD
225:Dandiya
1488:Ferien
1382:MBihun
1023:single
983:and/or
783:ad hoc
621:, and
529:Ballet
161:Bolero
129:WP:FAC
36:scale.
1459:|ans=
1449:This
1339:|ans=
1329:This
1257:|ans=
1247:This
1139:Dance
771:WP:RS
623:Zdebe
97:Dance
84:Dance
59:Dance
28:This
1493:talk
1477:talk
1421:talk
1396:here
1386:talk
1357:talk
1305:talk
1275:talk
1196:talk
1112:talk
1032:talk
954:talk
946:some
872:talk
791:talk
712:talk
639:talk
577:talk
558:talk
499:talk
471:talk
445:talk
427:talk
407:talk
362:more
291:more
262:see
249:and
86:and
1457:or
1337:or
1255:or
779:fix
777:'s
733:be:
531:or
1509::
1479:)
1463:no
1423:)
1413:}}
1407:{{
1398:?
1388:)
1359:)
1343:no
1307:)
1277:)
1261:no
1198:)
1114:)
1034:)
956:)
874:)
793:)
714:)
641:)
617:,
613:,
609:,
605:,
601:,
597:,
593:,
579:)
560:)
552:?
501:)
491:}}
485:{{
473:)
463:}}
457:{{
447:)
409:)
359:-
355:-
351:-
347:-
343:-
339:-
335:-
331:-
327:-
323:-
319:-
315:-
311:-
288:-
284:-
280:-
276:-
227:-
223:-
219:-
207:-
203:-
199:-
195:-
191:-
187:-
183:-
179:-
175:-
171:-
167:-
163:-
159:-
155:-
1495:)
1491:(
1475:(
1419:(
1384:(
1355:(
1303:(
1290:Y
1273:(
1219:w
1216:o
1213:n
1210:S
1194:(
1160:w
1157:o
1154:n
1151:S
1110:(
1082:w
1079:o
1076:n
1073:S
1030:(
1000:w
997:o
994:n
991:S
952:(
918:w
915:o
912:n
909:S
870:(
830:w
827:o
824:n
821:S
789:(
710:(
686:w
683:o
680:n
677:S
637:(
575:(
556:(
497:(
469:(
443:(
429:)
425:(
405:(
145::
131::
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
