226:
21:
1020:. However, the EN article is already good enough so it is not clear that there would really be much value in expanding it, the AR article is under-sourced thus would probably not meet the quality requirements from EN Wiki, and the template has been here since 2008 so it is extremely unlikely that someone will work on this since it hasn't happened in the last 16 years. I think that, for articles such as this one, the template should be removed.
782:
637:
345:
327:
355:
1249:
project... sadly, you have to verify each one yourself (or through some bot or metric, accepting some errors). For example I use some templates to select articles for my students for various activities, and sigh, we have a lot of false positives (ex. the 'requested image' template, used on talk, is very often left in place in articles that have images - this needs some major cleanup, sigh).
904:
195:
415:
275:
257:
475:
Basically, if there is not an article name specified, I want there to be a Google translate link generated based on the title in the foreign language at wikidata. (Currently, if no title is specified, no machine translation link is added.) This behavior already exists elsewhere in the template, just trying to add it for the machine translation as well.
1196:. Finally, there is the issue of whether you want paid OKA editors to be spending time on this, rather than translating articles; I think the goal of removing unneeded templates is a good one, so this is mostly a question of prioritization of editor time, and in this case, OKA funds as well; not something that I can or should have any input on.
950:
1009:(e.g., contains one section that the EN article misses, despite the EN article being better overall), using this template does more harm than good in my opinion as it dilutes the signal (since almost all Knowledge (XXG) articles will have at least one other language for which the article is at least marginally better).
1184:
should prevail. So, while I agree with your proposal of how it *ought* to be used, I'm not sure where I stand on the question of whether that should be codified by additional language in the template, and will be interested in what other feedback you get about it. I can see pluses and minuses on both
1286:
Regarding use of translators time: I agree that it is better for them to focus on translating than fixing templates. However, I'm planning for OKA to be a very long-term project and to scale it even further, so I assume we will eventually run out of "Good content" to translate, so I want to explore
931:
When there are multiple languages, the template says "You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in...". This is wrong, because it refers to multiple articles. In the section of the template code for when more than one language is specified, please replace
1172:
has that level of visibility, and it doesn't argue that the article is deficient in any way, so has a lower bar for inclusion: there is not so much objection to "one editor thinks this article could be improved by expanding it with translations from the
Spanish article" as there is to "one editor
1248:
I mostly agree; the issue is that articles are expanded sometimes but the template is not removed. And yes, sometimes it is added when the differences are not major. But like with all other templates, there is no manpower to verify them. If you want to use this or anything other for any serious
474:
pinging you at your request. My earlier post: " Right now the link for corresponding article has a switch so that it calls
Wikidata information where the article is not specified. I would like the same behavior to happen for the creation of the machine translation link at translate.google.com."
1293:
2) Removing noise, so that these maintenance tags can actually be used by the broader community (as Piotr mentioned, it's currently hard to use these tags as a signal, which is unfortunate). There's also the general concern that the community has of paid editors not helping with the "clean up"
1054:
to be considered. The "guidance" offered in most templates is often nothing more than the opinion of the editor who wrote the documentation for the template, subject to the changes to the doc made by other editors, based on their opinions, so you could say that the guidance is based on
611:
1297:(on a related note: if you're aware of important simple maintenance tasks that require a lot of manpower and that are neglected in Knowledge (XXG), I'm also happy to look into it as a potential project for OKA, such as the "image requested" one mentioned by Piotr)
607:
1157:
template on top of an article purely because they disagree with the content, and sometimes when they have raised objections on the Talk page that have been roundly rejected, but that is not a legitimate use of those templates, and they may be removed per
1023:
Is there any general guidance as to when it is considered ok to delete this template? If we can align on clear criteria, I could task the translators in my non-profit to go through the full backlog and remove it when required.
1136:
As far as placing the bar high, I would agree with that as well, but it is still quite subjective, and difficult to codify. Some templates are scrutinized more than others; for example, some editors will place a
586:
701:
578:
1335:
1283:
Then I will start removing this template on a few pages such as the example I shared, adding a link to that discussion in the edit descriptions, and see if anyone objects to this approach.
518:
to a question I posed there, regarding a subtask that I believe would be necessary in order to implement your request. I'm still looking around for other methods that might work; perhaps
990:
I would like to use the "Expand" templates (in various languages) to help identify articles that could benefit from the help of a translator, in the context of our work at the non-profit
1126:
445:
435:
1192:
of the template; in those cases the template should be moved to the section in question, and if it is absent, just add the header by itself, and place the template under it with
1325:
1330:
186:
1340:
119:
1210:
One other solution for a similar situation: when you have an empty article section for which you wish to highlight articles in other languages, you could place a
727:
606:, which seems to be correct according to the /doc here, but this does not seem to make any difference. The template still displays "Slovenian" and looks for e.g.
154:
41:. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
293:
282:
262:
82:
991:
1345:
723:
1350:
680:
Yes, there are many. Click on "Wikidata item" on the
Template page and scroll down to see links to this template on other languages' Wikipedias. –
160:
1355:
1130:
182:
178:
377:
880:
Editors have different preferences for which articles belong where, and so it is very confusing to people trying to go through the categories.
749:
1221:
1129:
ended with a strong Keep); where there is some contention is about whether to place the template at the top, or bottom of articles (e.g.,
1162:; having a template that impugns the content of an article based on one person's opinion is generally seen as disruptive. I don't think
1017:
69:
368:
332:
997:
To make this template truly useful, I think it would be better if it was only used when the corresponding other-language article is
100:
994:. However, I find it challenging because a large share of articles tagged with this template do not really need to be expanded.
63:
46:
149:
38:
1294:
activities, so I'm hoping we can increasingly take a role in these maintenance tasks that volunteers don't typically like to do
237:
49:}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
842:
Yes, in theory, and
Slovenian has the same problem. I think it's better that that bridge be crossed when it happens, though.
140:
32:
1287:
other value-adding activities that translators can do on
Knowledge (XXG). Cleaning up these translation tags can help with:
617:
Do we need to revert the category moves, or can the template be modified to generate categories using "Slovene", please? –
51:
421:
77:
567:
829:
766:
621:
194:
173:
910:
205:
1166:
1099:
805:
712:
104:
26:
665:
Are there versions of this template for use in other Wikis, for articles that could be expanded from
English?
243:
286:, a collaborative effort to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to
1225:
1119:
596:
1109:
502:
480:
130:
42:
826:
819:
763:
735:
618:
376:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1092:
145:
1214:
1067:
885:
1060:
612:
Special:WhatLinksHere/Category:Biography articles needing translation from
Slovenian Knowledge (XXG)
582:
514:, this might need a feature that is not yet available in order to implement it. I got a response at
414:
685:
288:
1271:
1237:
1201:
552:
527:
210:
1177:
1159:
1051:
774:
1255:
1151:
937:
670:
579:
Knowledge (XXG):Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_September_25#Slovenian_Wikipedia_categories
571:
544:
511:
498:
476:
126:
1181:
1084:
1056:
1077:
970:
846:
791:
646:
207:
87:
1188:
Regarding your point about the foreign article just being better in one section, see param
79:
1302:
1133:, and also at the linked Tfd) but this has not resulted in any change in present behavior.
1040:
1013:
881:
608:
Special:WhatLinksHere/Category:Articles needing translation from
Slovenian Knowledge (XXG)
360:
1088:
745:
681:
540:
515:
1091:
for example, and the design and documentation of those templates have correspondingly
781:
636:
1319:
1267:
1233:
1229:
1197:
1180:. Often there is objection to adding more guidance in writing, where common sense or
1028:
548:
523:
492:
469:
56:
1306:
1275:
1261:
1241:
1205:
1044:
979:
941:
889:
851:
837:
796:
689:
674:
651:
629:
556:
531:
506:
484:
209:
80:
1251:
1141:
1032:
959:
933:
666:
85:
966:
843:
788:
757:
705:
643:
519:
354:
344:
326:
1298:
1290:
1) Identifying real cases where the articles would benefit from being expanded
1036:
350:
1125:) have a reasonably high level of visibility, and are not very contentious (
424:. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
292:. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the
373:
274:
256:
866:
A lot of articles fit into multiple topic categories. For example:
876:
Articles about natural disasters could fall into "hist" and "sci".
801:
Thank you, that resolves the immediate need. But if somebody uses
587:
Category:Articles needing translation from
Slovene Knowledge (XXG)
1001:
than the English article. When the corresponding article is only
932:"the corresponding article" with "the corresponding articles".
724:
Category:Articles needing translation from N’Ko Knowledge (XXG)
702:
Category:Articles needing translation from N'Ko Knowledge (XXG)
898:
409:
296:, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.
219:
211:
95:
15:
750:
meta:Table_of_Wikimedia_projects#Projects_per_language_codes
1063:. (That said, a few templates get a lot of attention, like
1059:, sometimes of a pretty low level, and often most based on
572:
https://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/English_list.php
1050:
Yes, I would support this in principle, but there is also
873:
Articles about elections could fall into "gov" and "hist".
870:
Articles about athletes could fall into "bio" and "sport".
722:
is still looking for the old category name with diacritic
566:
The language code sl is still given the name Slovenian at
84:
78:
67:. Functionality of the template can be checked using
895:
Template-protected edit request on 13 September 2024
372:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1012:I would suggest putting the bar high. For example,
825:, will it still be looking for the old category? –
1336:WikiProject Translation studies (general) articles
1173:thinks the content of this article is in dispute".
1035:FYI as I suspect you may have an opinion on this
302:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Translation studies
236:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
8:
581:ended a unanimous consensus to use the name
1326:Template-Class Translation studies articles
1222:Principle of legality in criminal law#Italy
516:Module talk:Wd#Titles from other wikipedias
1331:NA-importance Translation studies articles
1176:One possible problem with the proposal is
321:
251:
986:Guidance for when to remove this template
539:That one went stale, but I re-upped with
280:This template is within the scope of the
1341:WikiProject Translation studies articles
305:Template:WikiProject Translation studies
61:Any contributor may edit the template's
741:also exists but is not currently used.
614:rather than "Slovene Knowledge (XXG)".
323:
253:
39:heavily used or highly visible template
1193:
1189:
562:Slovene Knowledge (XXG), not Slovenian
1252:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
386:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Languages
366:This template is within the scope of
225:
223:
7:
585:. The categories have been moved to
242:It is of interest to the following
103:for discussing improvements to the
762:are you able to assist, please? –
661:Equivalent template in other Wikis
14:
125:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
1346:Template-Class language articles
1095:of consensus.) I would say that
948:
902:
780:
635:
420:This template was nominated for
413:
353:
343:
325:
273:
255:
224:
193:
120:Click here to start a new topic.
19:
1351:NA-importance language articles
589:& subcats, but are empty.
283:WikiProject Translation Studies
1356:WikiProject Languages articles
1307:15:47, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
1276:06:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
1262:05:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
1242:00:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
1206:20:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
1045:19:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
1007:better in very selective parts
980:14:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
942:13:16, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
568:Module:Language/data/ISO_639-2
557:04:50, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
507:23:00, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
485:13:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
389:Template:WikiProject Languages
1:
1280:Thanks both for the response!
1018:this corresponding AR article
890:20:42, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
690:20:24, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
675:21:14, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
380:and see a list of open tasks.
117:Put new text under old text.
1226:Armed Forces of Belarus#CSTO
852:16:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
838:15:57, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
797:15:39, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
775:12:46, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
652:04:18, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
630:08:29, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
308:Translation studies articles
925:to reactivate your request.
913:has been answered. Set the
1372:
532:05:45, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
1105:(and its child templates
862:Multiple topic categories
695:
338:
268:
250:
155:Be welcoming to newcomers
1220:template instead, as in
27:Template:Expand language
1083:, the structure of the
700:After a speedy move to
583:Slovene Knowledge (XXG)
47:edit template-protected
1016:has less details than
150:avoid personal attacks
55:to add usage notes or
444:, 5 August 2011, see
434:, 16 April 2021, see
369:WikiProject Languages
187:Auto-archiving period
1230:Steam railcar#Sweden
999:substantially better
45:, editors may use {{
522:will have an idea.
299:Translation studies
289:Translation Studies
263:Translation studies
748:are not listed at
463:improving template
238:content assessment
161:dispute resolution
122:
1089:Welcome templates
1003:marginally better
929:
928:
545:User:Calliopejen1
458:
457:
454:
453:
408:
407:
404:
403:
400:
399:
392:language articles
320:
319:
316:
315:
218:
217:
141:Assume good faith
118:
94:
93:
1363:
1258:
1219:
1213:
1195:
1191:
1171:
1165:
1156:
1150:
1146:
1140:
1124:
1118:
1114:
1108:
1104:
1098:
1082:
1076:
1072:
1066:
978:
963:
956:
952:
951:
920:
916:
906:
905:
899:
833:
824:
818:
814:
810:
804:
784:
770:
761:
740:
734:
721:
717:
711:
639:
625:
605:
601:
595:
496:
473:
426:
425:
417:
410:
394:
393:
390:
387:
384:
363:
358:
357:
347:
340:
339:
329:
322:
310:
309:
306:
303:
300:
277:
270:
269:
259:
252:
229:
228:
227:
220:
212:
198:
197:
188:
96:
88:
37:because it is a
23:
22:
16:
1371:
1370:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1316:
1315:
1260:
1256:
1217:
1211:
1169:
1167:Expand language
1163:
1154:
1148:
1144:
1138:
1122:
1116:
1112:
1106:
1102:
1100:Expand language
1096:
1080:
1074:
1070:
1064:
1014:this EN article
988:
964:
957:
949:
947:
918:
914:
903:
897:
864:
849:
848:it has begun...
831:
822:
816:
812:
808:
806:expand language
802:
794:
793:it has begun...
768:
755:
738:
732:
719:
718:with parameter
715:
713:expand language
709:
698:
663:
649:
648:it has begun...
623:
603:
599:
593:
592:I have updated
564:
541:this discussion
490:
467:
465:
391:
388:
385:
382:
381:
361:Language portal
359:
352:
307:
304:
301:
298:
297:
214:
213:
208:
185:
167:
166:
136:
105:Expand language
90:
89:
83:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1369:
1367:
1359:
1358:
1353:
1348:
1343:
1338:
1333:
1328:
1318:
1317:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1295:
1291:
1288:
1284:
1281:
1250:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1186:
1174:
1134:
1120:Expand Catalan
987:
984:
983:
982:
973:
927:
926:
907:
896:
893:
878:
877:
874:
871:
863:
860:
859:
858:
857:
856:
855:
854:
847:
815:) rather than
792:
704:, the article
697:
694:
693:
692:
662:
659:
657:
655:
654:
647:
597:Expand Slovene
563:
560:
537:
536:
535:
534:
464:
461:
456:
455:
452:
451:
450:
449:
439:
418:
406:
405:
402:
401:
398:
397:
395:
378:the discussion
365:
364:
348:
336:
335:
330:
318:
317:
314:
313:
311:
278:
266:
265:
260:
248:
247:
241:
230:
216:
215:
206:
204:
203:
200:
199:
169:
168:
165:
164:
157:
152:
143:
137:
135:
134:
123:
114:
113:
110:
109:
108:
92:
91:
86:
81:
76:
75:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1368:
1357:
1354:
1352:
1349:
1347:
1344:
1342:
1339:
1337:
1334:
1332:
1329:
1327:
1324:
1323:
1321:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1289:
1285:
1282:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1259:
1253:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1216:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1168:
1161:
1153:
1143:
1135:
1132:
1128:
1121:
1111:
1110:Expand German
1101:
1094:
1093:higher levels
1090:
1086:
1079:
1069:
1062:
1058:
1053:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1025:
1021:
1019:
1015:
1010:
1008:
1004:
1000:
995:
993:
985:
981:
976:
975:
968:
961:
955:
946:
945:
944:
943:
939:
935:
924:
921:parameter to
912:
908:
901:
900:
894:
892:
891:
887:
883:
875:
872:
869:
868:
867:
861:
853:
850:
845:
841:
840:
839:
836:
834:
828:
821:
813:|langcode=nqo
807:
800:
799:
798:
795:
790:
787:
783:
779:
778:
777:
776:
773:
771:
765:
759:
753:
751:
747:
746:N'Ko language
742:
737:
730:
728:
725:
720:|langcode=nqo
714:
707:
703:
696:N'Ko language
691:
687:
683:
679:
678:
677:
676:
672:
668:
660:
658:
653:
650:
645:
642:
638:
634:
633:
632:
631:
628:
626:
620:
615:
613:
609:
604:|name=Slovene
598:
590:
588:
584:
580:
575:
573:
569:
561:
559:
558:
554:
550:
546:
542:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
513:
510:
509:
508:
504:
500:
494:
489:
488:
487:
486:
482:
478:
471:
462:
460:
447:
443:
440:
437:
433:
430:
429:
428:
427:
423:
419:
416:
412:
411:
396:
379:
375:
371:
370:
362:
356:
351:
349:
346:
342:
341:
337:
334:
331:
328:
324:
312:
295:
291:
290:
285:
284:
279:
276:
272:
271:
267:
264:
261:
258:
254:
249:
245:
239:
235:
231:
222:
221:
202:
201:
196:
192:
184:
180:
177:
175:
171:
170:
162:
158:
156:
153:
151:
147:
144:
142:
139:
138:
132:
128:
127:Learn to edit
124:
121:
116:
115:
112:
111:
106:
102:
98:
97:
74:
72:
71:
66:
65:
58:
54:
53:
52:documentation
48:
44:
40:
36:
34:
28:
25:
18:
17:
1194:|section=yes
1085:User warning
1026:
1022:
1011:
1006:
1002:
998:
996:
989:
971:
953:
930:
922:
911:edit request
879:
865:
830:
811:again (with
785:
767:
754:
744:Code nqo or
743:
731:
699:
664:
656:
640:
622:
616:
591:
576:
565:
538:
512:Calliopejen1
499:Calliopejen1
477:Calliopejen1
466:
459:
441:
431:
367:
294:project page
287:
281:
244:WikiProjects
233:
190:
172:
99:This is the
68:
62:
60:
50:
35:from editing
31:permanently
30:
1266:Very true.
1215:Further ill
1068:Talk header
820:Expand N'Ko
736:Expand N'Ko
706:Madina-Oula
1320:Categories
1257:reply here
1061:WP:SILENCE
1005:, or only
915:|answered=
882:Numberguy6
844:* Pppery *
789:* Pppery *
644:* Pppery *
497:thoughts?
446:discussion
436:discussion
70:test cases
57:categories
1190:|section=
1182:consensus
1057:consensus
827:Fayenatic
764:Fayenatic
682:Jonesey95
619:Fayenatic
577:However,
543:. Adding
383:Languages
374:languages
333:Languages
163:if needed
146:Be polite
107:template.
101:talk page
43:consensus
33:protected
1268:Mathglot
1234:Mathglot
1198:Mathglot
1178:WP:CREEP
1160:WP:WTRMT
1152:Disputed
1127:this Tfd
1052:WP:CREEP
1029:Mathglot
549:Mathglot
524:Mathglot
493:Mathglot
470:Mathglot
422:deletion
234:template
191:365 days
174:Archives
131:get help
1078:Infobox
1033:Piotrus
960:TTWIDEE
934:TTWIDEE
667:Irtapil
64:sandbox
1185:sides.
967:Ahecht
758:Pppery
726:, see
708:using
520:Thayts
240:scale.
1299:7804j
1228:, or
1037:7804j
919:|ans=
909:This
835:ondon
786:Fixed
772:ondon
641:Fixed
627:ondon
602:with
232:This
159:Seek
1303:talk
1272:talk
1238:talk
1202:talk
1131:here
1041:talk
974:PAGE
972:TALK
954:Done
938:talk
886:talk
686:talk
671:talk
570:per
553:talk
528:talk
503:talk
481:talk
442:Keep
432:Keep
148:and
1147:or
1142:POV
1087:or
992:OKA
917:or
752:.
574:.
29:is
1322::
1305:)
1274:)
1240:)
1232:.
1224:,
1218:}}
1212:{{
1204:)
1170:}}
1164:{{
1155:}}
1149:{{
1145:}}
1139:{{
1123:}}
1117:{{
1115:,
1113:}}
1107:{{
1103:}}
1097:{{
1081:}}
1075:{{
1073:,
1071:}}
1065:{{
1043:)
965:--
940:)
923:no
888:)
823:}}
817:{{
809:}}
803:{{
739:}}
733:{{
729:.
716:}}
710:{{
688:)
673:)
610:/
600:}}
594:{{
555:)
547:.
530:)
505:)
483:)
189::
181:,
129:;
73:.
59:.
1301:(
1270:(
1254:|
1236:(
1200:(
1039:(
1031:@
1027:@
977:)
969:(
962::
958:@
936:(
884:(
832:L
769:L
760::
756:@
684:(
669:(
624:L
551:(
526:(
501:(
495::
491:@
479:(
472::
468:@
448:.
438:.
246::
183:2
179:1
176::
133:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
