99:
148:
130:
1038:
Yugoslavia because the
Kingdom of Yugoslavia was a un-Constitutional move of a dictator Alexander Karageorgevitch, he suspended the previous Constitution of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, installed martial law, reigned unlawfully, dissolved the Parliament, etc. But I do not claim that the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes should be included in the list. (2b) You deliberately construed the
158:
232:
214:
643:
had an elaborate "plan", you sir would most likely not be able to comprehend it, least of all predict it. Therefore you should probably assume all your "ideas" on my intentions are blatantly wrong. At least, I hope you will do me the courtesy of sparing me from having to read gibberish every time I see your post. Rest assured that the Admins you keep addressing
242:
1588:
Istria. But, they had sections in this page. Existence of
Ottoman Empire in Croatia was lasted three hundred years and sometime most of it was part of her. But, she hadn't any section in this page. Why ? As if there was an Anti-Turk sentiment on it. Please, you finish this sentiment and add an Ottoman Empire section in this page, please. Yours sincerely
699:
whether or not it was a member of the League of
Nations). The annexation and destruction of a state like Yugoslavia in such a manner is an illegal act per contemporary international law. Thereby rendering any and all "states" formed by sheer force on its illegally occupied sovereign territory - illegal (non-existent). These documents state:
820:(5) We do not know whether the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes (from 1929-1941 called the Kingdom of Yugoslavia) signed the Hague Conventions of 1907 (let alone ratified). But we do know that His Royal Highness the Prince of Montenegro signed the Conventions as well as His Majesty the King of Servia. Did that help the
1587:
I added 'existence of
Ottoman Empire in Croatia (1492-1791)' section in this pace. But, it was deleted unfairly. Existence of Republic of Venice in Croatia was limited in western Istria and Dalmatia. Before taking remnant of Hungarian Croatia in 1527, one of Habsburg Monarcy in was limited in eastern
399:
Was
Croatia "not in Yugoslavia" during WWII? This is only true if one considers the Independent State of Croatia a legal entity and successor to Yugoslavia. Who considers the NDH a legal Croatian state? Fascists and right-wing neo-nazi Ustaše supporters. Who gives a damn about what they think? Noone,
1379:
Historiography is not Law. States are not formed nor destroyed. They are a fact during their existance. One can describe some states using different atributes; the very fact of their existance cannot be illegal, if no international law on the creation of states existed during the WWII. Now we have a
421:
section heading that covers
Croatia from 1918 to 1991 is "Croatia within Yugoslavia". Get over it, and curb your nationalist censorship of historic facts. The only reason you want to remove that heading is because you don't like the fact that Croatia was a part of Yugoslavia, OR, maybe you're trying
698:
The ISC signed the Geneva conventions?? I did not know that LoL... what a joke that was, that's like Pol Pot joining the Red Cross. Anyway, the Geneva conventions do not interest me. Rather the Hague
Conventions of 1907 of which Yugoslavia was a signatory and Germany a founding state (regardless of
1565:
proves my point: not even if I had university publications explicitly supporting my view would you acknowledge that you are WRONG. What am I supposed to do on articles and templates where there is no way to support either way with sources? There's no chance of ending the discussion, unless I don't
1307:
Our most recent era — Modern Times — begins with the end of these revolutions in the 19th century, and includes the World Wars era (encompassing World War I and World War II) and the Cold War. The 'contemporary era' follows shortly afterward with the explosion of research and increase of knowledge
642:
If I just drop bombs you just repeat yourself and your ridiculous paranoid theories about my "schemes" over and over again. The comical part is that you must think yourself very "clever" whenever you uncover a "scheme" of mine that you imagine. Countless times all you talk about is my "plan". If I
906:
Italy were not States
Parties of the Hague Conventions (1907), as well as the Kingdom of Albania under the House of Savoy (Albania was still a separate Kingdom). The Kingdom of Montenegro (re-est. in 1941. was completely legal, even if was under protection of the Kingdom of Italy + had not had a
592:
You do not discuss but drop little "bombs" like the third point. You omitt discussion about the State of
Slovenes, Croats and Serbs in hopes that when someone comes along (an admin) that your statement, about the Kingdom of SHS being exactly the same as the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, would prevail.
1037:
topics are null and void. The Modern
History is a good enough term + most exact, not because I say so – but because (1) historians acknowledge the division on Modern and Contemporary (novija & najnovija). (2a) Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes is not exactly the same as the Kingdom of
612:
Let me make it clear, your accusations are null and void when it comes to my person. I am not mislead by any ideology. On the other hand some users claim that they are Croatian, but write Slav on their user page and do that knowing that some nations consider Croats as
975:
started to support the Partisan movement (then still organized by federal lines) the Soviet Union changed its standing regarding the modes of cooperation between the Partisan movement and the Royal Government in Exile. This was definitely approved at the
678:, but that template uses "modern history" for the entire period up to the present, which is naturally the meaning of the terms "modern history" and "recent history". If you want to use that method, that would be sensible. The current section title is not.
966:
decided that Yugoslavia would be re-created, re-constituted or what ever, and it was explicitly said that this re-constitution would happen after the WWII. This means that there were no Yugoslavia at that point. Also the Soviets did not acknowledge the
704:
The Contracting Powers recognize that hostilities between themselves must not commence without previous and explicit warning, in the form either of a reasoned declaration of war or of an ultimatum with conditional declaration of war. Hague III, Art.
1124:
an illegal act. This was recognized by every single Allied state. Both Yugoslavia and Germany were "signatory powers" of the 1907 Hague Conventions - Germany violated them (as she did many times before). This point is then closed as well?
1168:, you deliberately quote certain aspects of the Hague Conventions in a misleading way. Yugoslavia was re-constituted after the WWII with approval of all Allies. Up to 1943 the Allies had different views. States cannot be illegal;
722:
of its Section III is blatantly violated by the formation of another state on the territory of an occupied hostile state (Yugoslavia). Occupied territory of one state remains the territory of that state and no other until the war
1164:(3) Stop inserting your blatant POV into this discussion, it is not the topic. You insist on this discussion as a way of testing ground for your expedition in the article about Yugoslav partisans. Please stop. Did you read about
1231:(other than to avoid the term "Yugoslavia", of course...). This is beyond silly, you can forget about this introduction of your own arbitrary categories and ages deliberately designed to avoid the use of the word "Yugoslavia".
1175:(4) We should have an article about Croatia in the WWII — which would be placed in this template — instead of the Independent State of Croatia and the Federal State of Croatia. This would provide that we re-name the heading
482:(5) The heading he is proposing is not neutral and bias because the Croatian Parliament never ratified the inclusion of the Triune Kingdom of Croatia, Dalmatia and Slavonia in the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes.
681:
The Kingdom SHS was renamed into "Kingdom of Yugoslavia". These are not two states. What we have here is mindless nitpicking on your part, as usual. Knowledge (XXG) treats them as one state, see the articles on
1380:
different sittuation, and the international law on the creation of states and self-determination is still being written (namely in the case of the Republic of Kosovo — and we know how you feel about that issue)
694:
about the Kingdom SHS being seperate before you mangle this template by listing the same country twice. Hell, you get me any historian that properly states he considers them seperate and I will concede this
596:
In other history templates we do not have your approach of listing the federations to which one country was part of. Serbian history template lists the Principality of Serbia as part of its Modern History.
1172:
some acts (documents), some actions, some symbols. Why we do not have anything written about the National Liberation Army and Partisan Detachments of Croatia, the Croatian antifacist partisan movement.
923:(12) Conclusion: International Law was Swiss Cheese then and now. Permanent Members of the Security Council of the United Nations are not obliged to respect and fulfill (execute) the judgements of the
318:
in History of Croatia series, but the articles do not exist at the moment, so there's no sence in putting the red links to the Template. When the articles get written, then put them in the template. --
1355:(mentions only the most recent names such as the Kingdom of Serbia (but not the Principality of Serbia) and also mentions the Kingdom of Yugoslavia (but not the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes).
810:(4) I never mentioned the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes as something worthy of mentioning in this template. Stop suggesting otherwise. The Kingdom of Yugoslavia was a known dictatorship under
1100:, only quoted by the worst kind of right-wing ultranationalists. There was no Sabor at the time to ratify it! The Sabor was essentially a provincial parliament of the Austro-Hungarian Empire and
1161:(2) Technically, the Constitution of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes did not gain 2/3 of the members of parliament, the elections were rigged, the election law was not democratic, etc.
571:
to do so. What happens? You get bored and think the matter is over. This is not over, must I make this "interesting" for you? Discuss. Or do you only discuss when there's an edit-war? --
892:
385:
I'm not going to discuss this with you: the Kingdom SHS = Yugoslavia - its the same state, just renamed. Its Yugoslavia. I'd have to be a total idiot to even discuss this with you.
1242:" entry. You can forget about this kind of POV. Too many Croats died fighting the occupation of their homes for me to allow this kind of blatant avoidance of the simple fact that
1050:
up to the first Constitution of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes. (3) The talk about Hague Conventions of 1907 has nothing to do with this template, you forced it in. --
1093:
it really shows your desperation in avoiding the term "Yugoslav". Why do you believe, and what source can you use to verify your claim that the Modern period lasts up to 1991??
1019:
to lead a discussion with each post being one page long, can you get that?? Half that stuff you wrote up there doesn't even have anything to do with the question at hand... --
647:
about your "theories" anymore than my imagined "plans", and that you live in a fantasy world where people actually read what two conflicting persons think about each-other. --
1109:
Technically, the King had every right to disband the parliament because of the shootings that took place (Radić killed, etc..). You and I both know its a political move, but
609:
states formed during war are illegitimate (exact wording, paragraphs, years, pages — please). Also you should know that ISC signed the Geneva Conventions on January 20, 1943.
39:
880:
but for Austria it did apply. The United Nations is obligated under its Charter to protect former mandates of the League of Nations (failed to do so in the case of Danzig).
1117:
he had every right to assume the powers that he did (the sneaky bstrd). You do not insist on the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes? Can we at least get that behind us?
891:(de jure regenda) There are many different Hague Conventions, like the Hague Conventions on Civil Procedure (for instance ISC in its relation to Switzerland respected the
784:(2) Modern history for some nations includes only the 20th century, but for some nations it apparently includes the 19th century also, this prove that the heading is used
599:
They even omitt the fact that the Principality was for the major part of its existence under the Ottoman Empire (independent from 1878 to 1882, when it became a kingdom).
774:
542:
defend the "legitimacy" of the NDH is an ultranationalist Ustaše-supporter. Why? Because only they are so blinded by bias that they are capable of ignoring simple facts.
1597:
521:
This is not something I am going to debate. It is public knowledge. Croatia was within Yugoslavia immediately after WWII, not after Alexander I's dictatorship.
74:
1223:
definition I've never heard of before??? There are many definitions, some say "modern" refers to the period "1800 - present", others "18th century - 1973".
1534:
365:
Other parameters might be needed for further use of the infobox in more articles. The above parameters are used when stacking along with other infoboxes. -
473:, but because this person (Mr. DIREKTOR) apply modern laws, the United Nations to a historical state. This is pure Yugoslav revisionism and fabrication.
1373:
cannot be a part of this template. This new article if written properly and without revisionism should be in the template, and not some Yugoslav Front.
1456:
1626:
1611:
924:
670:
I repeat the crucial question again, as it has stupidly gone unanswered in your large posts full of rubbish descriptions of my imaginary "schemes":
80:
1631:
1616:
1185:(5) Stop the nonsense about what Modern History means in different Historiographies. Modern History can include everything up to this moment. The
1096:
Furthermore, your postulate that Croatian inclusion in Yugoslavia is somehow "illegal" because the Croatian parliament never "ratified" that is a
503:
Did you just invent a category? "Recent history = 1918-1991"? In your dreams. All you are doing is avoiding the term "Yugoslav" which you removed.
1621:
1340:
and its Fifth Republic (1958-present) in the 20th century. History is not Mathematics. This way we could list what you insist we not call the
426:
how to phrase the section without mentioning Yugoslavia, and you're cooking-up weird and inaccurate phrases. I am not backing down on this. --
1636:
1557:
All your arguments are excuses so that you can have your way in spite of all sense and reason. Discussion with you is absolutely and utterly
469:(2) Legitimacy. I am not going to debate with a person who is biased towards any form of Yugoslavia, not because Yugoslavia is something bad
1081:
recognize the division of history into "Modern" and "Contemporary" the way you imagined it (in 1991). Stop repeating that nonsense. There's
264:
180:
861:
with the German Reich, Kingdom of Italy and other, Yugoslavia apparently allowed presence of Axis troops and never formally left the Pact.
602:
You should also stop making original research claims of something "would have been declared illegitimate" if United Nations were arround.
1460:
1415:
460:
449:
441:
1500:
1390:. The two are connected but the displayment of countries in which Croatia "participated" is proposterous and definitely not objective.
707:" No such declaration of war preceded the invasion of Yugoslavia. Aggression and destruction of a sovereign state in such a manner is
479:(4) Mr. DIREKTOR is not familiar with the terms: novija povijest, najnovija povijest. Modern History, Latest (Contemporary) History.
1562:
606:
20:
1478:
No need to repeat you're not about to agree to anything I do - I got the message... Please don't edit any of my talkpage posts. --
1582:
1246:. This is not open for debate. The Yugoslav Front article directly refers to the fighting on Croatian soil during WWII, there is
986:
citizens of the Soviet Union and of Yugoslavia were to be handed over to their respective countries, regardless of their consent.
255:
219:
171:
135:
69:
828:? Montenegro was annexed on 13 November 1918, and the Conference of Ambassadors in Paris gave international recognition to the
388:
The NDH was a wartime creation formed by foreign powers on occupied Yugoslav territory. Yugoslavia as a state obviously never
110:
928:
60:
1583:
Why isn't any section about Ottoman Empire in History of Croatia page despite existence of her was lasted 3 hundred years ?
1386:
This is a template used for the gathering of the timeline and the topics on History of Croatia and not on the History of
1042:
because I noted and insist that the State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs was independent before December 1, 1918 and this
1033:
You do not know how to skim read?! Please stop patronising with talk of brevity or legibility. You know very well that
415:
includes "War of Independence" and "Republic of Croatia". This is another ridiculous debate I am about to go into. The
1362:
1348:
is also oriented towards displayment of Moldovan history and not the history of some federations Moldova was part of.
1345:
865:(8) The Hague Conventions do not contain any sort of data which describes how states are formed, it is not the modern
422:
to "add legitimacy" to the NDH? Typical censorship with the purpose to mislead. It is obvious to anyone that you have
340:
336:
24:
1349:
1329:
918:
Article 1 of the present Convention shall take effect in case of war between two or more of the Contracting Powers.
675:
948:(14) United States of America for instance signed but not ratified the Geneva Conventions on humanitarian law.
116:
960:
The Partisans of Yugoslavia should be supported by supplies and equipment and also by commando operations.
529:
1089:
1973, after which comes the Postmodern era. "Contemporary period" is such an incredible piece of made-up
315:
303:
50:
854:
821:
687:
512:
263:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
179:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1365:(not the current redirect). This template is about the History of Croatia and not about the History of
528:- as a wartime creation. Yugoslavia was also never dissolved as a state during WWI (I suggest you read
65:
1566:
start banging my head against the wall at how much energy I've wasted writing all this - and give-up.
311:
299:
1593:
1589:
672:
Why exactly does "recent history" or "modern history" not include events that took place after 1991?
1257:
1193:
but highligthed to show that Croatia gained independence which is of top importance in any History.
874:
1561:, since you do not budge no matter the evidence, no matter the meditation. The comical display at
955:
825:
370:
46:
359:
marginleft=0.1em - the width of the margin outside the left edge of the box (default: 1.0em).
1542:
1508:
1468:
1446:
1427:
1399:
1200:
1055:
997:
977:
866:
623:
489:
858:
690:. This is in accordance with all the sources listed to that effect in the article(s). You
593:
Croatia was not always in Yugoslavia and the Modern History is a good enough term to use.
343:", then traits of the infobox must be changed by passing parameters. New parameters are:
1577:
1546:
1512:
1486:
1472:
1455:
Mr. DIREKTOR is using this talk page as a sand playing ground. This is proposterous. He
1450:
1431:
1403:
1278:
1204:
1133:
1059:
1027:
1001:
750:
655:
627:
579:
555:
493:
434:
374:
322:
1526:
1370:
1313:
1235:
1216:
1082:
769:
has different meanings in different Historiographies. Please stop the nonsense that we
247:
163:
887:
the Hague Conventions relating to the law of war apply in terms only to wars in which
392:
capitulated (the army surrendered, not the state), and much of its territory was even
1605:
1571:
1480:
1272:
1127:
1104:
ceased to exist along with it. Ever heard of the State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs?
1021:
744:
649:
573:
549:
428:
1353:
contains federal entities only in those cases where Kosovo did not have its own unit
1146:
was not inserted by me, but I think it is perfectly suited for the period after the
1530:
1293:
1239:
366:
319:
908:
1011:
points of this discussion, each referring to the specific change in the article:
567:
I stop reverting your rubbish to avoid an edit-war, being aware that you are too
1538:
1504:
1464:
1442:
1423:
1395:
1196:
1051:
993:
777:
in the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes was never approved. This notion of
619:
508:
501:
Why exactly does "recent history" not include events that took place after 1991?
485:
147:
129:
683:
237:
153:
773:
write Croatia in Yugoslavia, you advocate this even if the inclusion of the
605:
I have asked you many times to list exactly where it is written that by the
444:. Then it was Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes. You deliberately put:
231:
213:
1308:
known as the Information Age in the latter 20th century and 21st century.
1270:. How does this reflect the flow of history? How is this "objective"? --
260:
176:
259:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of
730:(The reason I hadn't looked for the exact text earlier is because
1260:
above the Kingdom of Yugoslavia which was the entity Croatia was
1256:
Another point is placing the almost-irrelevant 1939 entity of
1120:
Very well, just so you know: the occupation of Yugoslavia was
350:
92:
15:
356:
boxwidth=220px - the width of the box table (default: 205px)
400:
certainly not the Croatian government, and neither will I.
1250:
to use the general article on World War II on a template
816:
I did not list the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes.
873:(9) Hague conventions also work only in some cases, For
1332:
has its First Republic (1792-1804) under the header of
1336:, Third Republic (1870-1940) under the same header of
1085:, and the "Postmodern" era. Modern history lats up to
889:
all belligerents are States Parties to the Conventions
792:
obviously describe the most recent period of history.
781:
is also one of the viewpoints widely held in Croatia.
524:
The NDH is illegitimate in accordance to the pre-war
1244:
Croatia was a part of Yugoslavia during World War II
175:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1529:cannot be part of this template. Did you read what
951:(15) You need to discern emotions from the subject.
1463:from the template to further his yugoslav POV. --
775:Triune Kingdom of Croatia, Slavonia, and Dalmatia
396:controlled by various Yugoslav guerrilla forces.
1441:. It is by the previously held conversation. --
1234:I am also not backing down on the usage of the "
1525:You have started edit-waring knowing that your
1305:
846:(in some parts also destruction) of Yugoslavia
109:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1569:Your efforts have destroyed this template. --
328:New parameters boxclass, boxwidth, marginleft
8:
718:through Hague IV, you will find that nearly
339:" to be stacked on to the related infobox "
1499:will not work. Did you read the latest at
1225:Why in the world should this template use
208:
124:
1437:can help with your vision that it is not
1007:Imbris, what is this? Concentrate on the
925:Permanent Court of International Justice
803:(recent, and most recent) in context of
411:than "Modern History". "Recent History"
824:from being occupied and annexed by the
738:change your position regardless of the
210:
126:
1414:For what purpose is this example? The
795:(3) Have you never heard of the terms
1361:There should be an article about the
916:Article 3 Paragraph 1 direct quote: "
615:Skjavi, Ribeli i razni drugi maladeti
253:This template is within the scope of
169:This template is within the scope of
98:
96:
7:
1495:You should realize that POV-pushing
893:Hague Conventions on Civil Procedure
742:amount of evidence in your face.) --
1461:State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs
1416:State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs
532:). Even in our modern Croatia, the
461:State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs
450:State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs
442:State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs
273:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject History
189:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Croatia
115:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
1501:Talk:Socialist Republic of Croatia
1344:under the header of 20th Century.
1150:. I have added a note besides the
14:
1563:Talk:Independent State of Croatia
1154:heading, that it could be called
711:by international law at the time.
353:class of table (default: infobox)
45:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
455:in order not to show that state
240:
230:
212:
156:
146:
128:
97:
40:Click here to start a new topic.
1627:Template-Class history articles
1612:Template-Class Croatia articles
1632:NA-importance history articles
1617:NA-importance Croatia articles
1578:09:11, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
1547:02:31, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
929:International Court of Justice
1:
1622:All WikiProject Croatia pages
1513:22:58, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
1487:22:46, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
1473:22:44, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
1451:22:29, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
1432:22:22, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
1219:" mean "1918 - 1991"? That's
1215:I ask you again: why should "
962:" — but more importantly the
943:of the the present Convention
476:(3) History has a time flow.
407:"Recent History" is actually
267:and see a list of open tasks.
183:and see a list of open tasks.
37:Put new text under old text.
1637:WikiProject History articles
375:00:32, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
323:15:31, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
276:Template:WikiProject History
192:Template:WikiProject Croatia
1363:Croatia during World War II
1346:Template:History of Moldova
814:Alexander Karageorgevitch.
341:Template:History_of_Hungary
337:Template:History_of_Croatia
310:Yeah, it'd be nice to have
1653:
1350:Template:History of Kosovo
1330:Template:History of France
676:Template:History of Serbia
1598:18:39, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
1497:Croatia within Yugoslavia
1436:No ammount of <hr: -->
1314:Modern history#Modern era
1013:write up a shorter answer
969:Royal Government in Exile
936:Hague IV (1907) Article 8
714:Furthermore, if you just
435:23:46, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
225:
141:
123:
75:Be welcoming to newcomers
1404:19:03, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
1279:22:50, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
1205:21:43, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
1134:09:23, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
1060:00:14, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
1028:21:31, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
1002:21:18, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
927:and its "successor" the
751:23:17, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
656:23:17, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
628:22:12, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
580:21:47, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
556:08:26, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
494:00:29, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
1156:The Republic of Croatia
984:decided illegaly that "
466:as it should be shown.
349:boxclass=infobox - the
1319:
971:. Then when the other
900:Saxe-Coburg and Gotha’
530:Creation of Yugoslavia
335:To allow the infobox "
70:avoid personal attacks
1266:a part of for nearly
855:Kingdom of Yugoslavia
822:Kingdom of Montenegro
688:Kingdom of Yugoslavia
513:Kingdom of Yugoslavia
499:What utter NONSENSE:
1238:" redirect for the "
1187:Contemporary History
1177:Contemporary Croatia
1152:Contemporary Croatia
1144:Contemporary Croatia
1418:was not within any
1323:Further Evidence on
1258:Banovina of Croatia
1181:Independent Croatia
978:Argonaut Conference
934:(13) There is also
875:Free City of Danzig
316:Migration of Croats
304:Migration of Croats
256:WikiProject History
172:WikiProject Croatia
111:content assessment
81:dispute resolution
42:
25:History of Croatia
1079:absolutely do not
895:, and vica versa)
842:is what made the
826:Kingdom of Serbia
812:illegitimate king
667:Now to business:
607:Hague conventions
538:person who would
526:Hague conventions
519:one and the same.
306:from the template
295:
294:
291:
290:
287:
286:
207:
206:
203:
202:
91:
90:
61:Assume good faith
38:
1644:
1576:
1574:
1485:
1483:
1317:
1277:
1275:
1132:
1130:
1083:"Modern" history
1026:
1024:
941:the denunciation
914:Hague III (1907)
867:Helsinki Accords
835:on 13 July 1922.
760:
749:
747:
654:
652:
578:
576:
554:
552:
433:
431:
380:"Recent History"
312:Origin of Croats
300:Origin of Croats
281:
280:
279:history articles
277:
274:
271:
250:
245:
244:
243:
234:
227:
226:
216:
209:
197:
196:
195:Croatia articles
193:
190:
187:
166:
161:
160:
159:
150:
143:
142:
132:
125:
102:
101:
100:
93:
16:
1652:
1651:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1602:
1601:
1585:
1572:
1570:
1481:
1479:
1412:
1318:
1312:
1273:
1271:
1227:your own little
1128:
1126:
1077:No, historians
1022:
1020:
878:(did not apply)
859:Tripartite Pact
758:
745:
743:
692:get me a source
650:
648:
574:
572:
550:
548:
429:
427:
382:
330:
308:
278:
275:
272:
269:
268:
246:
241:
239:
194:
191:
188:
185:
184:
162:
157:
155:
87:
86:
56:
12:
11:
5:
1650:
1648:
1640:
1639:
1634:
1629:
1624:
1619:
1614:
1604:
1603:
1584:
1581:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1527:Yugoslav Front
1518:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1490:
1489:
1439:Modern History
1411:
1408:
1407:
1406:
1392:
1391:
1381:
1374:
1371:Yugoslav Front
1356:
1342:Modern History
1320:
1310:
1296:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1254:
1252:about Croatia.
1236:Yugoslav Front
1232:
1217:Modern history
1208:
1207:
1194:
1191:Modern History
1183:
1173:
1162:
1159:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1122:from the start
1118:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1065:
1063:
1062:
1005:
1004:
990:
989:
952:
949:
946:
932:
921:
910:
896:
881:
871:
862:
851:
840:piece of paper
836:
818:
808:
793:
782:
767:Modern History
761:
756:
755:
754:
753:
728:
727:
726:
725:
724:
712:
696:
679:
662:
661:
660:
659:
658:
637:
636:
635:
634:
633:
632:
631:
630:
610:
603:
600:
597:
594:
585:
584:
583:
582:
561:
559:
558:
544:
543:
522:
504:
464:
463:
453:
452:
438:
437:
404:
403:
402:
401:
386:
381:
378:
363:
362:
361:
360:
357:
354:
329:
326:
307:
298:Why I removed
296:
293:
292:
289:
288:
285:
284:
282:
265:the discussion
252:
251:
248:History portal
235:
223:
222:
217:
205:
204:
201:
200:
198:
181:the discussion
168:
167:
164:Croatia portal
151:
139:
138:
133:
121:
120:
114:
103:
89:
88:
85:
84:
77:
72:
63:
57:
55:
54:
43:
34:
33:
30:
29:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1649:
1638:
1635:
1633:
1630:
1628:
1625:
1623:
1620:
1618:
1615:
1613:
1610:
1609:
1607:
1600:
1599:
1595:
1591:
1580:
1579:
1575:
1567:
1564:
1560:
1548:
1544:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1514:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1488:
1484:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1470:
1466:
1462:
1458:
1453:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1434:
1433:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1409:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1394:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1382:
1378:
1375:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1360:
1357:
1354:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1324:
1321:
1315:
1309:
1303:
1300:
1297:
1295:
1291:
1288:
1287:
1280:
1276:
1269:
1265:
1264:
1259:
1255:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1230:
1228:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1195:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1160:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1135:
1131:
1123:
1119:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1094:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1075:
1073:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1036:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1025:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1003:
999:
995:
992:
991:
987:
983:
979:
974:
970:
965:
961:
957:
953:
950:
947:
944:
942:
938:which allows
937:
933:
930:
926:
922:
919:
915:
911:
909:
905:
902:Bulgaria and
901:
897:
894:
890:
886:
882:
879:
876:
872:
870:
868:
863:
860:
856:
852:
849:
845:
841:
837:
834:
831:
827:
823:
819:
817:
813:
809:
806:
802:
798:
794:
791:
787:
783:
780:
776:
772:
768:
765:(1) The term
764:
763:
762:
752:
748:
741:
737:
733:
729:
721:
717:
713:
710:
706:
701:
700:
697:
693:
689:
685:
680:
677:
673:
669:
668:
666:
665:
664:
663:
657:
653:
646:
641:
640:
639:
638:
629:
625:
621:
618:
617:
616:
611:
608:
604:
601:
598:
595:
591:
590:
589:
588:
587:
586:
581:
577:
570:
566:
565:
564:
563:
562:
557:
553:
546:
545:
541:
537:
536:
531:
527:
523:
520:
516:
514:
510:
505:
502:
498:
497:
496:
495:
491:
487:
483:
480:
477:
474:
472:
467:
462:
458:
457:
456:
451:
447:
446:
445:
443:
436:
432:
425:
420:
419:
414:
410:
406:
405:
398:
397:
395:
391:
387:
384:
383:
379:
377:
376:
372:
368:
358:
355:
352:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
342:
338:
334:
327:
325:
324:
321:
317:
313:
305:
301:
297:
283:
266:
262:
258:
257:
249:
238:
236:
233:
229:
228:
224:
221:
218:
215:
211:
199:
182:
178:
174:
173:
165:
154:
152:
149:
145:
144:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
122:
118:
112:
108:
104:
95:
94:
82:
78:
76:
73:
71:
67:
64:
62:
59:
58:
52:
48:
47:Learn to edit
44:
41:
36:
35:
32:
31:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1586:
1568:
1558:
1556:
1531:User:GregorB
1496:
1454:
1438:
1435:
1419:
1413:
1387:
1383:
1376:
1366:
1358:
1352:
1341:
1338:19th century
1337:
1334:19th century
1333:
1325:
1322:
1306:
1301:
1299:Evidence for
1298:
1294:Modern Times
1289:
1267:
1262:
1261:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1240:World War II
1229:definition??
1226:
1224:
1220:
1190:
1186:
1180:
1176:
1169:
1165:
1155:
1151:
1148:independence
1147:
1143:
1121:
1114:
1110:
1101:
1097:
1090:
1086:
1078:
1071:
1064:
1047:
1044:independence
1043:
1039:
1034:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1006:
985:
981:
972:
968:
963:
959:
940:
939:
935:
917:
913:
903:
899:
888:
884:
877:
864:
847:
843:
839:
832:
829:
815:
811:
804:
800:
796:
790:Contemporary
789:
785:
779:not approved
778:
770:
766:
757:
740:overwhelming
739:
735:
731:
719:
715:
708:
703:
691:
671:
644:
614:
568:
560:
539:
534:
533:
525:
518:
517:The two are
506:
500:
484:
481:
478:
475:
470:
468:
465:
454:
439:
423:
417:
416:
412:
408:
393:
389:
364:
333:09-Dec-2008:
332:
331:
309:
254:
170:
117:WikiProjects
106:
19:This is the
1189:is part of
1111:technically
857:signed the
844:dissolution
788:. The term
674:You quoted
645:do not care
509:Kingdom SHS
459:|data10 =
1606:Categories
1590:Cemsentin1
1420:Yugoslavia
1388:Yugoslavia
1367:Yugoslavia
1292:It can be
1072:Skim read?
1046:continued
1035:your three
1017:impossible
684:Yugoslavia
448:|data9 =
440:(1) It is
1559:pointless
1248:no reason
1102:naturally
980:when the
801:najnovija
786:variously
759:/outdent/
734:you will
413:certainly
83:if needed
66:Be polite
27:template.
21:talk page
1573:DIREKTOR
1482:DIREKTOR
1274:DIREKTOR
1268:21 years
1263:directly
1158:instead.
1142:(1) The
1129:DIREKTOR
1091:nonsense
1048:de facto
1023:DIREKTOR
1015:. It is
853:(7) The
746:DIREKTOR
651:DIREKTOR
575:DIREKTOR
569:juvenile
551:DIREKTOR
430:DIREKTOR
394:de facto
107:template
51:get help
1457:deleted
1410:Example
1115:legally
1074:LoL...
848:illegal
830:illegal
805:History
709:illegal
511:is the
424:no idea
390:de jure
367:Wikid77
320:Dijxtra
270:History
261:History
220:History
186:Croatia
177:Croatia
136:Croatia
1539:Imbris
1533:wrote
1505:Imbris
1465:Imbris
1443:Imbris
1424:Imbris
1396:Imbris
1197:Imbris
1166:EUREKA
1052:Imbris
994:Imbris
982:Allies
973:Allies
964:EUREKA
956:EUREKA
907:king)
904:Savoy’
898:(10a)
838:(6) A
799:&
797:novija
732:I know
695:point.
620:Imbris
486:Imbris
471:per se
113:scale.
1537:? --
1503:. --
1422:. --
1316:— § 3
1087:circa
1009:three
954:(16)
912:(11)
883:(10)
723:ends.
409:worse
105:This
79:Seek
1594:talk
1543:talk
1535:here
1509:talk
1469:talk
1459:the
1447:talk
1428:talk
1400:talk
1377:(2b)
1359:(2a)
1221:your
1201:talk
1113:and
1098:joke
1056:talk
998:talk
885:Also
771:must
716:skim
686:and
624:talk
540:dare
535:only
507:The
490:talk
418:only
371:talk
314:and
302:and
68:and
1384:(3)
1326:(1)
1302:(1)
1290:(1)
1179:to
1170:but
958:— "
833:act
736:not
720:all
351:CSS
1608::
1596:)
1545:)
1511:)
1471:)
1449:)
1430:)
1402:)
1369:.
1328::
1311:—
1304::
1203:)
1125:--
1058:)
1040:2a
1000:)
705:1.
626:)
547:--
492:)
373:)
49:;
1592:(
1541:(
1507:(
1467:(
1445:(
1426:(
1398:(
1199:(
1054:(
996:(
988:"
945:.
931:.
920:"
869:.
850:?
807:?
702:"
622:(
515:.
488:(
369:(
119::
53:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
