Template talk:Infobox US university ranking

1425:

organization's heardquarters etc.) as well as a detailed section dealing with the ranking's methodology. It is noteworthy that their website includes a detailed technical paper entitled "a quantitative approach to world university rankings" that deals with the latter methodology. I believe it would be reasonable to add it to the university ranking list, especially given that it's one of the few rankings (if not the only one) that do not rely on conventional surveys (hence adopting a very different yet solid, interesting and unbiased approach). I think CWUR has reached a certain level of prominence in the past few years (strengthened by the fact that it is mentioned by the world's top universities) and deserves to be included in the original ranking list.

1267: 177: 159: 2657:, I think Knowledge ought to balance a general audience with subject matter experts. In this case, the general audience weighting would have us putting the ranking in the lead infobox, which thankfully we don't do (although a lot of universities have it in the lead prose, something we're trying to stamp out). And as you point out, the subject matter experts would have us leave it out entirely. I think including it in a reputation section part-way down an article, accompanied by views by reputable scholars in the prose, is a happy medium. 325: 2282:, which use subcategories like liberal arts colleges, to appear first, which is warranted as they're overwhelmingly the most popular. Second, the consensus among reliable sources in education is weighted heavily against rankings overall, but to the extent that they endorse any, they much prefer ones that group similar institutions together to ones that try to flatten wildly different institutions into a single unified ranking. We should follow their lead and list the more specific ones first. 992:, the world ranking template was created after the Infobox US University ranking. My recollection was that a deliberate choice was made to include the same general reference for the US ranking infobox due to the shear number of edits needed to update the information. The actual ranking numbers do still have to be manually entered in the infobox for each article. It would be nice if we had a script for this that could parse the information automatically. I am going to list this discussion in 307: 2086:. I wonder, is it just a pandemic-era pause, or is it that they're permanently out of the business? What was the evidence from their website that they don't seem to be doing it anymore? If the indicators are solid, yeah, time to remove it from the template; if not, it might be prudent to wait until the 2022 rankings come out just to be sure, as it'd be a pain to have to re-add them. Someone could also just try emailing them directly and ask (maybe don't say why). 128: 335: 245: 2959: 227: 1667: 1223: 776: 2175: 1921: 422: 2462:, it's not ranked as "#N Best Engineering School" but rather "#N in National Universities". Similar for HBCUs, which when you click are categorized as liberal arts colleges at the core level. We want to be including the core categories but we don't want to include all the other more minor lists, which are not nearly as prominent. 2510:

One other small thing I spot, though: the change from "Academic rankings" to "U.S. Academic rankings" doesn't seem desirable, as anyone at the point in the article where they'd see this should already know which country the institution is in, so it doesn't add any new info, and it also seems to imply

1424:

Would it be reasonable to add the CWUR ranking to the list of global university rankings ? CWUR is mentioned in various university websites (MIT, UC Berkeley, UT Austin, UIUC, etc.). The CWUR website contains relevant information regarding the organization itself (i.e. the origins of the project, the

1015:

It seems like this information should be either (a) added and updated by a bot on an annual basis or (b) added to WikiData (where it would also be added and updated on an annual basis). Either option would require gathering and (at least temporarily) storing a large chunk of this proprietary ranking

2934:

Yeah, that sounds right. I do worry that this will make some articles out-of-sync or incorrect if they have old, outdated rankings but that's a separate problem (that could be addressed by moving the rankings into Wikidata where they could all be updated across all articles at one time or by getting

806:

The ARWU has never created a US national rankings. Just as the QS does not create US national rankings. Why are one of these two global rankings being chosen to be placed in the national rankings section and not the other? Neither were designed as a national ranking and they should both not be in

2109:

Thanks. I don't have any insight into this but I've asked a colleague who might. I'll let you know if she has any information on this. In the meantime, I agree with Sdkb that it doesn't hurt anything to leave the 2019 rankings in articles/templates until we know for sure what's going on (as long as

2003:

Following up three years later to add my support to including the need for context in the infobox guidelines. We should provide context, it's an area many articles ignore UNIGUIDE and in many articles the infobox is the only place rankings are listed. It works without modifying the infobox template

1988:

I'm amenable to this suggestion. I think we should provide this kind of context to help readers understand what a ranking means e.g., if a ranking system creates its own stratification like USN&WR and then ranks institutions within those strata then we should include that, too. I don't know how

1473:

One (valuable) example would be a recent paper published by Robinson-Garcia et al. (2019) entitled "Mining university rankings: Publication output and citation impact as their basis", which provides a detailed analysis and evaluation of university rankings including US News, ARWU, THE and CWUR. The

1042:

let me know how I can be helpful. Again not saying that the references shouldn't be there, I just feel they belong on the data side. When you consider the access date... If the template is used on 100 pages and I update 2 of them with newer data, that means that the access dates are in accurate for

2743:

Yeah, this has been a problem for a while. The way it has worked, if I understand correctly, is that someone will go through all the articles and update the rankings, and then once they've done that, they'll update the reference with the new year. But sometimes they forget one or the other, other

2229:

because I felt that this being a US-centric template, it should link to the US-centric page. The 'National' heading used to link to the US rankings page, but has been removed. The order of the headings has been altered. I figured 'National' should be first because it is a more general overview of

1358:

What criteria should be applied to evaluate this request? I hope that it's not just "this ranking exists and a couple of Knowledge editors think it's okay." (Yes, I realize that we haven't firmly confronted this issue and it could raise uncomfortable questions about other rankings already in the

2604:

The U.S. News college rankings have continued to be widely denounced by many higher education experts. Detractors argue that they rely on self-reported, sometimes fraudulent data by the institutions, encourage gamesmanship by institutions looking to improve their rank, imply a false precision by

2355:

those colleges as more worthy than baccalaureate colleges?). US News World Report can be moved up if your only issue was with it not being first, but it's not. Are LibArt colleges most popular in your opinion? I always thought that national rankings were more popular. I'll give you the final say.

2354:

global is what I prefer; national first because it presents a college in the context of the US as a whole, and subcategories after since I feel like it might otherwise imply one of those subcategories is most important (e.g. is putting liberal art ranking first going to imply that Knowledge sees

1377:

That's hard to answer (as everything's so subjective when it comes to rankings), but I think two factors can be considered. First, QS is one of the most widely cited university rankings in the world along with ARWU and Times. Second, they are very clear about their criteria: Employability (27%),

1577:

to request the template be edited. If you're not familiar with template syntax then you might also need to ask for some help as administrators commonly ask or require that the edit request be very, very specific about exactly what should be added or removed from the template. I'm not personally

2394:

will display the U.S. News liberal arts college ranking because it's a liberal arts college, but not any U.S. News national ranking because it's not ranked as a national research university. It'll display the national Forbes ranking, though, since Forbes doesn't break down institutions into

2576:

This was covered in a previous discussion section. An editor recently wanted to remove this instance from Harvard. Perhaps it is time to remove it from the template entirely? Schools should not have the ability to add or remove it because this creates an environment potential of bickering.

2723:

The current auto-generated references are from 2020 and 2021; however for (at least the) USNWR rankings page is currently running current data (for the 2022-2023 school year). We shouldn't be saying the data is from 2021 if the data is actual from later... We need to fix this.

2744:

times they don't complete the run, and still other times the run will be delayed and editors at individual articles will do updates that desync the data. It's definitely not optimal, and I'd be interested in discussion about how to make the system work better. Cheers,

2771:

If there aren't any copyright issues - and I think there may be but I'm not a lawyer - then this information looks like a prime candidate for adding to Wikidata where we can update it all in once place and just have the template pull the data from there.

2613:

by ignoring a well-known piece of fact for ideals sake. But even so, putting rankings in individual universities are not that useful; it would be much better to see the U.S. News rankings in a dedicated Knowledge list and compare the schools together.

957:

based on the above, shouldn't the references be removed from the template and provided by the article calling the template. Just updating the references in the templates implies that all the template values match the new reference... See how

1819:

That's an excellent point. But I worry that changing the heading to "College and university rankings" will be confusing, too, especially for universities that have constituent colleges. How about simplifying this to "Academic rankings" ?

2221:. A major change was to consolidate the subtemplates into a single template. This should not only make changes to template easier, but will also make the potential for subtle vandalism easier to notice. The header link has changed to be 1378:

Research (26%), Diversity & Internationalization (25%), and Learning Experience (22%). I think this would be a good list to measure the American universities' international reputations, as QS weights it more heavily than others.

2321:

Oh, also, could you have the right justifying of the numerals retain its current behavior, as that's cleaner? I.e. for an institution that's ranked 4th in one source and 17th in another, the 4 should line up with the 7, not the 1.

1794:

Since this template is used for colleges, not just universities, I think we shouldn't be piping the heading to make it just "university rankings" rather than "college and university rankings". If others agree I'll make the change.

2920:, The WSJ is no longer collaborating with THE on rankings. What are your thoughts on updating the template to WSJ/College Pulse? THE/WSJ rankings are two years old and may be misleading when displayed next to the latest rankings. 2786:

I'd agree with that. The main issue is that there's currently no property specifically for the U.S. News rankings or any other, but there is a general ranking property we can use with a qualifier to specify which one. Cheers,

2605:

deriving an ordinal ranking from questionable data, contribute to the admissions frenzy by unduly highlighting prestige, and ignore individual fit by comparing institutions with widely diverging missions on the same scale.

745:

The ARWU is a global ranking. They have never created US rankings. This national ranking needs to be removed. Similarly, there are no QS national rankings. ARWU is properly presented in the global rankings section.

563:

That is all I asked for, thank you. Basically, I wanted to make sure there is enough to prove its notability so that we're not fighting with others down the road. Which section do you want it in: "U.S." or "Global"?

1099:

page for North America? Given that the other rankings identified in that article seem to have established notability, it seems appropriate to expand this template to include those rankings as optional parameters.

1115:

Can you please be more specific about which ranking systems you would like added? There are a lot of systems listed in that article that don't appear to be notable or at least don't currently have an article.

1553:

You're right about the authors. Thanks for pointing it out. So for the ranking itself : can I add it myself or should it be done by someone else ? - Not sure what would be the next step since I'm new to this.

1072:

I'm not technically knowledgeable to accomplish what ElKevbo has proposed. Plus there is the issue of can we store this here? Maybe we could ask a third party to store the information in a database for us?

3094: 2182:. Please let me know if there are any issues. The whole template at some point will need to be converted to an infobox, per the tag, to modernize the code. But I'll leave that for someone else to do. 807:

the national rankings, not simply choosing one of the two to put there. The proper place for both of these global rankings is in the global rankings section alone. ARWU_National should be removed.

39: 2395:

subcategories. So when I'm talking about putting e.g. liberal arts college rankings first, that's only for liberal arts colleges and won't have any effect on anything else. Does that make sense?

580:

Great, thank you for your help with this. It should be in U.S. - I have no preference for what the parameter should be called, but something along the lines of "THE_US" or "THES_WSJ". Sincerely

2847: 2680:

Agreed. CactiStaccingCrane, you're welcome to nominate this template for deletion; I'm not optimistic that the nomination would be successful but you certainly have the right to make it.

1736:

Why should this new ranking be added to this template? Has this already been discussed somewhere? Have experts - scholars, major publications, etc. - begun using this ranking system?

441: 2372:) because they were tagged as needing a conversion. Integrating this into the larger one seems not important. I want to merge the subtemplates because it's just wholly unnecessary. 365: 1694:{{Infobox US university ranking/Global | ARWU_W = {{{ARWU_W|}}} | QS_W = {{{QS_W|}}} | THES_W = {{{THES_W|}}} | USNWR_W = {{{USNWR_W|{{{USNWR_GU|}}}}}} | WURI_W = {{{WURI_W|}}} }} 2970: 2359: 2345:

I dunno how to make it justified lol, but yeah I noticed that it looks off. I think it's misleading to link to the non-US article on rankings, even though this whole template is

1482:, which analyzes the CWUR ranking - These are just two examples among several others. There are also independent analyses such as the one made by "Study International". Regards. 823: 98: 3034:

I've added a fix for this cite error. The error occurred when the ARWU_W parameter had a value but ARWU_NU parameter was empty. There is now a check for this situation. Thanks!

2222: 1874: 905: 2697:, and usually a lot more people find these rankings right at the website instead. I'd agree with Sdkb that we should detail about the school's reputation in prose instead. 1861: 382: 273: 3074: 2597: 2279: 2450:

Looks good! Oh, and I'm seeing why undergrad engineering programs wasn't previously merged and shouldn't be merged. U.S. News is the only ranking in that category. At

2366: 2246: 1478:(Oxford University Press) which has an impact factor of ~3. There is another peer reviewed study (also a technical paper) by Jado and Harrison (2014) published in the 615: 3084: 3079: 2242: 2038:, I wonder if Forbes rankings are still a thing? No new rankings since 2019. Is it time to remove them from this US university ranking infobox? Thoughts? Thanks, 3089: 1163: 523: 460:

Hey, I'm having some trouble with the parameter "THE_WSJ" on a US university ranking Infobox. Is anyone else having this issue? Thanks and please let me know!

535: 514:

universities in the United States. Assessing the notability of a ranking is going to be, for the most part, an ambiguous and subjective assessment to make.

3099: 372: 269: 74: 1782: 699: 2231: 377: 2511:

that we're not going to include global rankings, even though in many cases we do. So I'd just keep "Academic rankings". It does introduce a slight

1750:

Hm, appears to be some brand new ranking created by a (as far as I can tell) non-notable entity. I couldn't find any independent coverage of it. –

2278:

On the ordering, I think that it should go from most specific type/locale to least specific. There are two reasons for this. First, it will cause

2285:

On the undergraduate engineering subtemplate, would there be any reason not to include that? Also, are you planning to merge all the way up to

252: 232: 24: 1615:

Thanks for the reply. So Should I do this on this very page ? In other words, can I create a new discussion here with an edit request (using

826:. I think this should be discussed further as it has been in the template for many years and it is likely to be in use on articles. — Martin 80: 1318: 1136:

the Niche national colleges ranking should be added into the template, considering that it is widely used among both parents and students.

2633: 906:

https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2019/world-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats

432: 193: 518:, if I were to make a case for the THE US college ranking, it would be that the ranking is published by what is recognized as one of the 2352:

As for the order, I am willing to change the order of the headings, but I just want to say that I feel that the order of national -: -->

2289: 2138: 348: 312: 2966: 360: 2962: 1321:) Considering that both U.S. News National & Global Rankings are in the template, I think it would be fair to add this as well. 1170: 1143: 726: 703: 542:. If this doesn't suffice I suggest you give me a more specific criteria/check-list for establishing what a "notable" ranking is. 502:

It is difficult to "prove" that any ranking is "notable". For example, ARWU isn't cited widely (in the media, etc) as a "notable"

2835: 1616: 1574: 1286: 1060: 975: 761: 618:

page and it doesn't seem to be appearing there either. There's no emergency to fix it now, but just wanted to keep you updated.

2995: 2226: 2134:

I think the ranking numbers ought to be floated so that they're right-justified, rather than left-justified at the right edge.

1870: 1096: 959: 888:

The references given in the infobox US university ranking - concerning the global universities rankings - are pretty outdated:

695: 519: 184: 164: 2999: 20: 1585:

when you want to get an editor's attention; simply using their username or an @ doesn't provide them with a notification.)

356:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

1776: 536:

https://web.archive.org/web/20101003203348/http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/schools%2Balways%2Bmarks/3560240/story.html

69: 2702: 2644: 2619: 2610: 1634: 1497: 1443: 1314: 1166: 741:

ARWU does not create national rankings - ARWU national needs removal - ARWU is properly presented in the global rankings

531: 139: 3039: 3003: 2925: 2609:

Yes, I understand that college rankings are a staple of U.S. college admissions and I do understand that we shouldn't

60: 2881:, under national rankings for Times Higher Education / Wall Street Journal (THE | WSJ) should be updated from using: 2110:

they're prominently labeled as 2019 rankings; all of our rankings should be prominently labeled with their year...).

1712:

For clarity: WURI has been added to the docs (by the requester) and just needs to be added to the template itself. –

899: 2834:, which I think is more popular than both of these. Apparently, 50% high school seniors have a Niche account and a 1078: 1001: 937: 922: 93: 2863: 2486: 2271:

On the linking, I kinda liked having both links appear, but I think your interpretation, more along the lines of

475:

It doesn't appear to be a parameter for this template; it's just incorrectly listed in the documentation as one.

107: 2694: 2079: 1347: 1255: 1184:

For regional universities, I think it makes sense to specify what region USNWR categorizes it as in. E.g. for

3035: 2921: 2698: 2640: 2615: 1673: 1279: 1229: 782: 1964:

I wonder if it might be better to include the total number of ranked institutions as part of each ranking.

1043:

the other 98... IMHO, provide the refs from the page calling the template and provide a date as well. I.E.

948: 918: 3053: 3024: 2582: 2249:(ignore 'dem cite errors). I would appreciate feedback. I intend to merge the changes in a month. Thanks! 1702: 650: 609: 575: 1319:

https://www.topuniversities.com/where-to-study/north-america/united-states/ranked-top-100-us-universities

1251: 1339: 1147: 1074: 1033: 997: 952: 933: 730: 534:

pages. Here is a secondary source that states THE is one of the world's most prominent ranking sources:

176: 158: 145: 3057: 3043: 3028: 2984: 2944: 2929: 2906: 2867: 2805: 2781: 2762: 2737: 2706: 2689: 2675: 2648: 2623: 2586: 2547: 2533: 2502: 2480: 2445: 2427: 2413: 2381: 2340: 2316: 2258: 2200: 2166: 2119: 2104: 2046: 2013: 1998: 1982: 1945: 1913: 1899: 1881:

it probably should. Do you think it'd be good to add that link over the "National rankings" subheader?

1864:, but I'll leave that to others to handle, as I'm not 100% about the terminology usage outside the U.S. 1852: 1829: 1813: 1759: 1745: 1721: 1706: 1651: 1594: 1532: 1460: 1409: 1387: 1368: 1351: 1332: 1303: 1259: 1208: 1174: 1151: 1125: 1109: 1082: 1067: 1025: 1005: 941: 926: 873: 856: 838: 816: 765: 734: 664: 643: 627: 602: 589: 568: 551: 497: 484: 469: 2902: 2859: 2358:

I added the engineering subtemplate because it's there; I don't see any reason not to, and there was

2073: 2039: 1756: 1718: 1622: 1485: 1431: 1383: 1379: 1328: 1324: 1139: 1105: 1101: 911: 852: 812: 757: 749: 722: 340: 1516: 2980: 2892: 2884: 2654: 1343: 1274: 50: 192:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

111: 2730: 1626: 1489: 1435: 993: 660: 623: 585: 547: 539: 465: 112: 65: 2459: 526:

article already. THE World University Ranking is a gold standard among rankings as noted on the

324: 306: 2349:

US rankings. It would also imply that LibArt or baccalaureate rankings are not bound to the US.

3049: 3020: 2940: 2777: 2685: 2578: 2115: 1994: 1909: 1825: 1741: 1731: 1698: 1647: 1590: 1528: 1456: 1405: 1364: 1121: 1021: 480: 428: 46: 910:

USNWR Best Global Universities Rankings: shown is 2017, but the current one is that of 2018:

2839: 2543: 2498: 2493:

is a mouthful, so I removed it. Thanks for your feedback! Do you think it's ready to merge?

2458:, etc. However, when you actually click on one of the schools in the engineering list, e.g. 2441: 2423: 2377: 2272: 2254: 2215: 1878: 1630: 1493: 1439: 639:

Sorry, I was on my tablet and didn't really look into it. It should (I hope!) be fixed now.

257: 109: 2898: 2829: 2391: 2390:

won't display anything about liberal arts colleges since it's not a liberal arts college.

2387: 2145: 2009: 1049: 984: 964: 848: 808: 753: 2596:

I don't think that these ranking infoboxes are useful nor encyclopedic. We all knew that

2230:

ranking every college in the US. I would like to note that there is another subtemplate,

1752: 1714: 1016:

data in our own database; I don't know about any potential legal issues this may raise.

493:

to the documentation page. If it is notable enough (provide proof), then we can add it.

2976: 2033: 1298: 1185: 892:

ARWU Shanghai Ranking: shown is 2017, but current one is for a long time that of 2018:

868: 833: 2994:

The infobox seems to be causing some broken reference errors on downstream pages. See

2491:

Best Undergraduate Engineering Programs At schools whose highest degree is a doctorate

2268:! Thanks so much for making that conversion; I'm looking forward to seeing it go live! 1619:

followed by the specific changes to be made)? I am slightly confused about it. Thanks

3068: 2725: 1582: 1420:

Adding the Center for World University Rankings (CWUR) to the university ranking list

1201: 656: 634: 619: 581: 558: 543: 461: 353: 1989:

well this would fit within the appropriate template(s) but it's worth looking into.

614:

No rush, but it seems the parameter isn't being recognized as of yet. I checked the

2936: 2913: 2773: 2681: 2111: 2083: 2063: 1990: 1905: 1857: 1821: 1737: 1643: 1610: 1586: 1550: 1524: 1470: 1452: 1401: 1360: 1117: 1037: 1017: 476: 900:

https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2019

702:? Both rankings are easily retrievable form the websites below maintained by the 2362:

like 12 years ago suggesting the inclusion (of others). I wanted to do this (and

2539: 2494: 2451: 2437: 2419: 2373: 2265: 2250: 2629:

P.S. This argument also apply to other related rankings and infoboxes, such as

2027: 904:

THE World University Rankings: shown is 2016, but current one is that of 2019:

893: 2005: 330: 261: 1250:

A parameter for Times Higher Education Liberal Arts rankings should be added

1095:

Is it possible to add all university ranking categories as identified on the

2917: 2793: 2750: 2663: 2521: 2468: 2401: 2386:

An institution will only display the categories that are relevant to it. So

2328: 2304: 2188: 2154: 2092: 2055: 1970: 1933: 1887: 1840: 1801: 1451:

What expert commentary and analysis is available about this ranking system?

1400:

What expert commentary and analysis is available about this ranking system?

1294: 864: 829: 244: 226: 189: 352:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the 932:

Yes, the sources were several years out of date. I have updated them all.

522:. Do note that the THE US college rankings have a devoted section on the 2454:, they offer a ton of different lists, including best CS programs, best 2512: 2275:, is a valid approach. Both rankings articles need substantial cleanup. 1869:

One other thing I notice with this template is that, while it links to

1860:, I'm realizing that the same issue also exists for other templates in 824:

Template talk:Infobox US university ranking/Archive 1#ARWU_NU to ARWU_N

265: 1359:

template and others that are not. We have to start somewhere, right?)

898:

QS World University Rankings: shown is 2018, but current one is 2019:

421: 1340:

https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/usa-rankings/2020

1578:

familiar with template syntax so I'm afraid I can't be very helpful.

2842:

listed Niche as the 2nd most influential ranking lists just behind

1317:

has just released its US university rankings for the first time. (

912:

https://www.usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/rankings

803:

I request the template editors delete this line. "| ARWU_NU = "

510:

ranking. That being said, ARWU is a parameter in the template for

996:

and see if we can't generate some more discussion on what to do.

714: 2893:

https://www.wsj.com/rankings/college-rankings/best-colleges-2024

2885:

https://www.timeshighereducation.com/rankings/united-states/2022

2828:

is already on this list, I propose we also add the ranking from

2455: 527: 2211:

Hi y'all! I just finished converting this template to be using

1338:

Agreed, since QS actually ranks the top 300, not just the 100 (

2082:), but I had this page on my watchlist, and here's a ping for 1661: 1217: 770: 540:

https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2010/11/11/state-rankings

416: 121: 113: 15: 696:

College_and_university_rankings#SCImago_Institutions_Rankings

2695:

Knowledge is not an indiscriminate collection of information

1188:

is in the North region. Therefore, the header bar that says

709: 2935:

a bot to update articles when new rankings are released).

268:

on Knowledge. Please visit the project page to join the

3014: 490: 456:

Times Higher Education/WSJ Ranking Template Not Working

3095:

Template-Class United States articles of NA-importance

2600:

suck. To quote from the article (with sources there):

506:

ranking in any sense - it's widely acclaimed as a top

3013:

Not sure how to resolve, as the diff for latest ARWU

2223:

College and university rankings in the United States

2022:

Is Forbes still in the business of ranking colleges?

1875:

College and university rankings in the United States

256:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 188:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2148:. Would anyone be interested in making this tweak? 2144:does this, but the U.S. version does not; see e.g. 1658:

Template-protected edit request on 26 December 2020

1045:

These rankings are current as of <Some date: -->

489:It's not a known parameter, but was added by an IP 2969:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at 1873:over the main header, it doesn't link anywhere to 1862:Category:University and college rankings templates 1162:I think that the "National" header should link to 2432:Fixed the justification. All that was needed was 2078:The ping didn't go through (see the weirdness of 1514:Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 1480:Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 2965:and similar subpages of this template have been 2598:U.S. News's ranking of universities and colleges 1573:The template is protected so you'll need to use 2963:Template:Infobox US university ranking/Regional 1214:Add Times Higher Education Liberal Arts Ranking 2972:the entry on the Templates for discussion page 2897:Am I able to go ahead with this alternation? 1164:Rankings of universities in the United States 520:world's most important education publications 8: 3006:for a few examples, they're all looking for 1642:Yes, that's exactly what you'll need to do. 894:http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU2018.html 524:Ranking of universities in the United States 2996:Case_Western_Reserve_University#References 2515:risk, but I'd say that's the lesser evil. 1620: 1483: 1429: 1137: 747: 720: 301: 221: 153: 3000:Catholic_University_of_America#References 2873:Updating source for infobox field THE_WSJ 2418:Ahhhh yeah that makes sense. Changed it. 1960:Should we say "4th of 366" or just "4th"? 1783:Webometrics Ranking of World Universities 1726:That was premature and has been reverted. 960:Template:Infobox world university ranking 700:Webometrics_Ranking_of_World_Universities 694:Can you please add two more parameters: 138:does not require a rating on Knowledge's 3075:Template-Class Higher education articles 2367:Infobox South Korean university ranking 2146:Duke University#Rankings and reputation 303: 223: 155: 3004:Florida_Atlantic_University#References 2953:Unused subpages nominated for deletion 2490: 1834:Good thought; I'll switch it to that. 282:Knowledge:WikiProject Higher education 3085:Template-Class United States articles 3080:WikiProject Higher education articles 2489:), but for engineering, the title of 655:Working perfectly now. Thanks a lot. 346:This template is within the scope of 285:Template:WikiProject Higher education 250:This template is within the scope of 182:This template is within the scope of 127: 125: 7: 3090:NA-importance United States articles 1091:Adding University Ranking Categories 433:Template:Infobox university rankings 393:Knowledge:WikiProject United States 144:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 3100:WikiProject United States articles 917:Could this be corrected? Regards, 861:Request disabled for now — Martin 436: 427:This template was considered for 396:Template:WikiProject United States 14: 2846:. It was frequently discussed in 962:has parmas for the references. -- 704:Spanish National Research Council 3016:looks fine. Should I roll back? 2957: 2507:Yep, I'd say go ahead and merge. 2173: 1919: 1697:include the WURI ranking syntax 1665: 1617:Template:edit template-protected 1575:Template:edit template-protected 1265: 1221: 774: 420: 333: 323: 305: 243: 225: 175: 157: 126: 40:Click here to start a new topic. 2227:College and university rankings 1871:College and university rankings 1581:(And you might want to use the 1523:o and Harrison, incidentally.) 1097:College and University Rankings 202:Knowledge:WikiProject Infoboxes 2868:02:32, 20 September 2023 (UTC) 2587:17:35, 14 September 2022 (UTC) 2434:|body-style=text-align: right; 2241:You can find these changes at 1786:to this template? Thank you! 1152:03:34, 19 September 2019 (UTC) 715:http://www.webometrics.info/en 205:Template:WikiProject Infoboxes 1: 2945:20:59, 24 February 2024 (UTC) 2930:23:09, 10 February 2024 (UTC) 2763:18:19, 28 February 2023 (UTC) 2738:17:25, 28 February 2023 (UTC) 1777:SCImago Institutions Rankings 1760:11:54, 27 December 2020 (UTC) 1746:21:28, 26 December 2020 (UTC) 1722:20:52, 26 December 2020 (UTC) 1707:13:32, 26 December 2020 (UTC) 1342:), which is more meaningful. 1083:14:00, 10 December 2018 (UTC) 942:19:26, 19 November 2018 (UTC) 665:15:51, 23 November 2017 (UTC) 644:15:41, 23 November 2017 (UTC) 628:14:48, 23 November 2017 (UTC) 603:14:20, 23 November 2017 (UTC) 590:14:10, 23 November 2017 (UTC) 569:13:48, 23 November 2017 (UTC) 552:13:07, 23 November 2017 (UTC) 498:17:30, 22 November 2017 (UTC) 485:16:32, 22 November 2017 (UTC) 470:16:22, 22 November 2017 (UTC) 196:and see a list of open tasks. 37:Put new text under old text. 25:Infobox US university ranking 2907:23:10, 14 October 2023 (UTC) 2707:01:32, 15 October 2022 (UTC) 2690:23:50, 14 October 2022 (UTC) 2676:22:46, 14 October 2022 (UTC) 2649:16:27, 14 October 2022 (UTC) 2624:16:24, 14 October 2022 (UTC) 2014:17:11, 6 February 2024 (UTC) 1637:) 13:44, July 18, 2020 (UTC) 1500:) 16:55, June 18, 2020 (UTC) 1446:) 17:49, June 15, 2020 (UTC) 1315:QS World University Rankings 1175:04:27, 18 October 2019 (UTC) 1126:17:13, 6 December 2018 (UTC) 1110:13:21, 6 December 2018 (UTC) 1068:19:15, 3 December 2018 (UTC) 1026:16:54, 3 December 2018 (UTC) 1006:15:03, 3 December 2018 (UTC) 253:WikiProject Higher education 3058:23:09, 21 August 2024 (UTC) 3044:23:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC) 3029:22:09, 21 August 2024 (UTC) 2985:05:55, 7 January 2024 (UTC) 2634:Infobox university rankings 2452:the page for their rankings 1688:to reactivate your request. 1676:has been answered. Set the 1244:to reactivate your request. 1232:has been answered. Set the 927:09:20, 7 October 2018 (UTC) 822:Some related discussion at 797:to reactivate your request. 785:has been answered. Set the 45:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 3116: 2806:14:13, 12 March 2023 (UTC) 2782:22:13, 11 March 2023 (UTC) 2538:Thanks! It's been merged. 2290:Infobox university ranking 2139:Infobox university ranking 1310:Add QS US National Ranking 1209:19:24, 24 March 2020 (UTC) 2548:22:47, 16 July 2022 (UTC) 2534:22:32, 16 July 2022 (UTC) 2503:19:09, 16 July 2022 (UTC) 2481:18:11, 16 July 2022 (UTC) 2446:17:53, 16 July 2022 (UTC) 2428:04:17, 16 July 2022 (UTC) 2414:04:12, 16 July 2022 (UTC) 2382:04:00, 16 July 2022 (UTC) 2341:03:23, 16 July 2022 (UTC) 2317:03:04, 16 July 2022 (UTC) 2259:22:36, 15 July 2022 (UTC) 2232:/UndergraduateEngineering 2201:04:18, 30 June 2021 (UTC) 2167:02:25, 16 June 2021 (UTC) 1652:19:30, 18 July 2020 (UTC) 1595:19:49, 20 June 2020 (UTC) 1533:04:19, 19 June 2020 (UTC) 1461:22:16, 15 June 2020 (UTC) 1410:22:15, 15 June 2020 (UTC) 710:http://www.scimagoir.com/ 349:WikiProject United States 318: 288:Higher education articles 238: 170: 152: 75:Be welcoming to newcomers 2392:Amherst College#Rankings 2388:Yale University#Rankings 2234:, which isn't included. 2120:22:28, 29 May 2021 (UTC) 2105:19:59, 29 May 2021 (UTC) 2080:Help:Fixing failed pings 2047:16:53, 29 May 2021 (UTC) 1999:22:34, 29 May 2021 (UTC) 1983:06:14, 20 May 2021 (UTC) 1946:06:11, 14 May 2021 (UTC) 1914:05:25, 14 May 2021 (UTC) 1900:03:29, 14 May 2021 (UTC) 1853:22:41, 13 May 2021 (UTC) 1830:19:45, 13 May 2021 (UTC) 1814:19:10, 13 May 2021 (UTC) 1774:Can somebody please add 1388:06:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC) 1369:21:04, 20 May 2020 (UTC) 1352:20:47, 20 May 2020 (UTC) 1333:19:39, 20 May 2020 (UTC) 1304:19:43, 10 May 2020 (UTC) 1260:15:58, 10 May 2020 (UTC) 874:06:50, 6 July 2018 (UTC) 857:21:38, 4 July 2018 (UTC) 839:07:07, 4 July 2018 (UTC) 817:15:49, 3 July 2018 (UTC) 766:15:22, 3 July 2018 (UTC) 735:15:41, 27 May 2018 (UTC) 354:United States of America 272:, and see the project's 2245:, and view the changes 2130:Right-aligning rankings 1904:Yeah, that would work. 1474:paper was published in 1287:edit template-protected 1167:ParadiseDesertOasis8888 2990:Broken Reference Error 2967:nominated for deletion 2485:There are more lists ( 2280:the U.S. News rankings 1047:. Food for thought. -- 399:United States articles 70:avoid personal attacks 2611:WP:Right great wrongs 594:It's been added. Use 185:WikiProject Infoboxes 2572:ARWU is not national 1277:for this alteration 439:. The result of the 341:United States portal 3048:Thanks very much!! 2592:Remove the rankings 2030:on my talk page by 1476:Research Evaluation 1291:template. — Martin 1273:please establish a 1158:Add link to infobox 884:References outdated 367:Articles Requested! 2877:The infobox field 2699:CactiStaccingCrane 2641:CactiStaccingCrane 2616:CactiStaccingCrane 2207:Infobox conversion 1512:Fair enough. (The 276:for useful advice. 208:Infoboxes articles 140:content assessment 81:dispute resolution 42: 3036:Redraiderengineer 2922:Redraiderengineer 2803: 2791: 2760: 2748: 2673: 2661: 2653:When considering 2531: 2519: 2478: 2466: 2411: 2399: 2338: 2326: 2314: 2302: 2198: 2186: 2164: 2152: 2102: 2090: 1980: 1968: 1943: 1931: 1897: 1885: 1850: 1838: 1811: 1799: 1692: 1691: 1638: 1625:comment added by 1501: 1488:comment added by 1447: 1434:comment added by 1302: 1271:Not done for now: 1248: 1247: 1154: 1142:comment added by 1132:Add Niche Ranking 1062:What I been doing 977:What I been doing 872: 837: 801: 800: 768: 752:comment added by 737: 725:comment added by 651:Corkythehornetfan 610:Corkythehornetfan 576:Corkythehornetfan 453: 452: 415: 414: 411: 410: 407: 406: 300: 299: 296: 295: 274:article guideline 220: 219: 216: 215: 120: 119: 61:Assume good faith 38: 3107: 3009: 2961: 2960: 2840:Inside Higher Ed 2804: 2801: 2800: 2798: 2789: 2761: 2758: 2757: 2755: 2746: 2728: 2674: 2671: 2670: 2668: 2659: 2638: 2632: 2532: 2529: 2528: 2526: 2517: 2479: 2476: 2475: 2473: 2464: 2435: 2412: 2409: 2408: 2406: 2397: 2371: 2365: 2339: 2336: 2335: 2333: 2324: 2315: 2312: 2311: 2309: 2300: 2294: 2288: 2273:MOS:SPECIFICLINK 2247:in the testcases 2238:it be included? 2220: 2214: 2199: 2196: 2195: 2193: 2184: 2181: 2177: 2176: 2165: 2162: 2161: 2159: 2150: 2143: 2137: 2103: 2100: 2099: 2097: 2088: 2077: 2067: 2059: 2044: 2037: 1981: 1978: 1977: 1975: 1966: 1944: 1941: 1940: 1938: 1929: 1927: 1923: 1922: 1898: 1895: 1894: 1892: 1883: 1879:MOS:SPECIFICLINK 1851: 1848: 1847: 1845: 1836: 1812: 1809: 1808: 1806: 1797: 1735: 1683: 1679: 1669: 1668: 1662: 1614: 1292: 1290: 1269: 1268: 1239: 1235: 1225: 1224: 1218: 1205: 1192:would render as 1075:Randomeditor1000 1063: 1055: 1052: 1041: 1034:Randomeditor1000 998:Randomeditor1000 990: 987: 978: 970: 967: 956: 953:Randomeditor1000 949:Mr. D. E. Mophon 934:Randomeditor1000 919:Mr. D. E. Mophon 862: 827: 792: 788: 778: 777: 771: 654: 638: 613: 597: 579: 562: 438: 437:29 November 2014 424: 417: 401: 400: 397: 394: 391: 343: 338: 337: 336: 327: 320: 319: 309: 302: 290: 289: 286: 283: 280: 279:Higher education 258:higher education 247: 240: 239: 233:Higher education 229: 222: 210: 209: 206: 203: 200: 179: 172: 171: 161: 154: 131: 130: 129: 122: 114: 16: 3115: 3114: 3110: 3109: 3108: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3065: 3064: 3007: 2992: 2958: 2955: 2875: 2860:NguyenLeDongHai 2818: 2794: 2792: 2788: 2751: 2749: 2745: 2726: 2721: 2664: 2662: 2658: 2636: 2630: 2594: 2574: 2522: 2520: 2516: 2469: 2467: 2463: 2433: 2402: 2400: 2396: 2369: 2363: 2329: 2327: 2323: 2305: 2303: 2299: 2292: 2286: 2218: 2212: 2209: 2189: 2187: 2183: 2174: 2172: 2155: 2153: 2149: 2141: 2135: 2132: 2093: 2091: 2087: 2074:GreaterPonce665 2071: 2061: 2053: 2042:GreaterPonce665 2040: 2031: 2024: 1971: 1969: 1965: 1962: 1934: 1932: 1928: 1920: 1918: 1888: 1886: 1882: 1841: 1839: 1835: 1802: 1800: 1796: 1792: 1772: 1770:SCIMAGO ranking 1729: 1695: 1681: 1677: 1666: 1660: 1608: 1422: 1312: 1284: 1266: 1237: 1233: 1222: 1216: 1203: 1198:Regional: North 1182: 1160: 1134: 1093: 1065: 1061: 1053: 1050: 1031: 988: 985: 980: 976: 968: 965: 946: 886: 790: 786: 775: 743: 692: 690:SCIMAGO ranking 648: 632: 607: 595: 573: 556: 538:. Again, here: 458: 398: 395: 392: 389: 388: 387: 373:Become a Member 339: 334: 332: 287: 284: 281: 278: 277: 207: 204: 201: 198: 197: 116: 115: 110: 87: 86: 56: 12: 11: 5: 3113: 3111: 3103: 3102: 3097: 3092: 3087: 3082: 3077: 3067: 3066: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3060: 2991: 2988: 2954: 2951: 2950: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2874: 2871: 2848:college forums 2836:recent article 2817: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2766: 2765: 2720: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2607: 2606: 2593: 2590: 2573: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2508: 2356: 2350: 2296: 2283: 2276: 2269: 2208: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2131: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2023: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 1961: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1867: 1865: 1791: 1788: 1771: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1727: 1693: 1690: 1689: 1670: 1659: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1579: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1464: 1463: 1421: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1372: 1371: 1355: 1354: 1344:Contributor321 1311: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1252:Obiwankablowme 1246: 1245: 1226: 1215: 1212: 1194:Regional—North 1186:Hunter College 1181: 1180:Specify region 1178: 1159: 1156: 1133: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1092: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1059: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 974: 915: 914: 908: 902: 896: 885: 882: 881: 880: 879: 878: 877: 876: 842: 841: 799: 798: 779: 742: 739: 691: 688: 686: 684: 683: 682: 681: 680: 679: 678: 677: 676: 675: 674: 673: 672: 671: 670: 669: 668: 667: 457: 454: 451: 450: 425: 413: 412: 409: 408: 405: 404: 402: 386: 385: 380: 375: 370: 363: 361:Template Usage 357: 345: 344: 328: 316: 315: 310: 298: 297: 294: 293: 291: 248: 236: 235: 230: 218: 217: 214: 213: 211: 194:the discussion 180: 168: 167: 162: 150: 149: 143: 132: 118: 117: 108: 106: 105: 102: 101: 89: 88: 85: 84: 77: 72: 63: 57: 55: 54: 43: 34: 33: 30: 29: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3112: 3101: 3098: 3096: 3093: 3091: 3088: 3086: 3083: 3081: 3078: 3076: 3073: 3072: 3070: 3059: 3055: 3051: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3041: 3037: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3026: 3022: 3017: 3015: 3011: 3008:Rankings_ARWU 3005: 3001: 2997: 2989: 2987: 2986: 2982: 2978: 2974: 2973: 2968: 2964: 2952: 2946: 2942: 2938: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2915: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2904: 2900: 2895: 2894: 2890: 2887: 2886: 2882: 2880: 2872: 2870: 2869: 2865: 2861: 2857: 2853: 2849: 2845: 2841: 2837: 2833: 2832: 2827: 2823: 2816:Niche ranking 2815: 2807: 2799: 2797: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2779: 2775: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2764: 2756: 2754: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2729: 2718: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2696: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2687: 2683: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2669: 2667: 2656: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2646: 2642: 2635: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2612: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2599: 2591: 2589: 2588: 2584: 2580: 2571: 2549: 2545: 2541: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2527: 2525: 2514: 2509: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2500: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2474: 2472: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2443: 2439: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2425: 2421: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2407: 2405: 2393: 2389: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2368: 2361: 2357: 2353:narrow -: --> 2351: 2348: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2334: 2332: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2310: 2308: 2297: 2291: 2284: 2281: 2277: 2274: 2270: 2267: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2248: 2244: 2239: 2237: 2233: 2228: 2224: 2217: 2206: 2202: 2194: 2192: 2180: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2160: 2158: 2147: 2140: 2129: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2098: 2096: 2085: 2081: 2075: 2070: 2069: 2065: 2057: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2045: 2043: 2035: 2029: 2021: 2015: 2011: 2007: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1976: 1974: 1959: 1947: 1939: 1937: 1926: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1893: 1891: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1866: 1863: 1859: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1846: 1844: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1818: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1807: 1805: 1789: 1787: 1785: 1784: 1779: 1778: 1769: 1761: 1758: 1755: 1754: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1733: 1728: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1720: 1717: 1716: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1687: 1684:parameter to 1675: 1671: 1664: 1663: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1618: 1612: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1583:ping template 1580: 1576: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1552: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1515: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1481: 1477: 1472: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1428:Best regards 1426: 1419: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1357: 1356: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1320: 1316: 1309: 1305: 1300: 1296: 1288: 1282: 1281: 1276: 1272: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1243: 1240:parameter to 1231: 1227: 1220: 1219: 1213: 1211: 1210: 1207: 1206: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1179: 1177: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1165: 1157: 1155: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1131: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1098: 1090: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1064: 1057: 1056: 1046: 1039: 1035: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1007: 1003: 999: 995: 991: 983: 982: 979: 972: 971: 961: 954: 950: 945: 944: 943: 939: 935: 931: 930: 929: 928: 924: 920: 913: 909: 907: 903: 901: 897: 895: 891: 890: 889: 883: 875: 870: 866: 860: 859: 858: 854: 850: 846: 845: 844: 843: 840: 835: 831: 825: 821: 820: 819: 818: 814: 810: 804: 796: 793:parameter to 784: 780: 773: 772: 769: 767: 763: 759: 755: 751: 740: 738: 736: 732: 728: 724: 717: 716: 712: 711: 707: 705: 701: 697: 689: 687: 666: 662: 658: 652: 647: 646: 645: 642: 636: 631: 630: 629: 625: 621: 617: 611: 606: 605: 604: 601: 593: 592: 591: 587: 583: 577: 572: 571: 570: 567: 560: 555: 554: 553: 549: 545: 541: 537: 533: 529: 525: 521: 517: 513: 509: 508:international 505: 501: 500: 499: 496: 492: 488: 487: 486: 482: 478: 474: 473: 472: 471: 467: 463: 455: 448: 444: 443: 434: 430: 426: 423: 419: 418: 403: 390:United States 384: 381: 379: 376: 374: 371: 369: 368: 364: 362: 359: 358: 355: 351: 350: 342: 331: 329: 326: 322: 321: 317: 314: 313:United States 311: 308: 304: 292: 275: 271: 267: 263: 259: 255: 254: 249: 246: 242: 241: 237: 234: 231: 228: 224: 212: 195: 191: 187: 186: 181: 178: 174: 173: 169: 166: 163: 160: 156: 151: 147: 141: 137: 133: 124: 123: 104: 103: 100: 97: 95: 91: 90: 82: 78: 76: 73: 71: 67: 64: 62: 59: 58: 52: 48: 47:Learn to edit 44: 41: 36: 35: 32: 31: 26: 22: 18: 17: 3050:SpookyTwenty 3021:SpookyTwenty 3018: 3012: 2993: 2971: 2956: 2896: 2891: 2888: 2883: 2878: 2876: 2855: 2851: 2843: 2830: 2825: 2821: 2820:Considering 2819: 2795: 2752: 2732: 2731: 2722: 2665: 2608: 2595: 2579:Altanner1991 2575: 2523: 2470: 2403: 2360:a discussion 2346: 2330: 2306: 2240: 2235: 2225:rather than 2210: 2190: 2178: 2156: 2133: 2094: 2041: 2028:this comment 2025: 1972: 1963: 1935: 1924: 1889: 1877:, which per 1842: 1803: 1793: 1781: 1775: 1773: 1751: 1732:Emreturkstam 1713: 1699:Emreturkstam 1696: 1685: 1674:edit request 1621:— Preceding 1607: 1520: 1513: 1484:— Preceding 1479: 1475: 1430:— Preceding 1427: 1423: 1323: 1313: 1278: 1270: 1249: 1241: 1230:edit request 1202: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1183: 1161: 1138:— Preceding 1135: 1094: 1048: 1044: 1014: 963: 916: 887: 847:Good point. 805: 802: 794: 783:edit request 748:— Preceding 744: 721:— Preceding 719:Thank you! 718: 713: 708: 693: 685: 640: 599: 565: 515: 511: 507: 503: 494: 459: 447:no consensus 446: 440: 378:Project Talk 366: 347: 262:universities 251: 183: 146:WikiProjects 135: 92: 19:This is the 3010:reference. 2243:the sandbox 1144:152.3.43.45 727:97.98.78.51 3069:Categories 2899:Kingapresa 2858:rankings. 2850:among the 2655:due weight 1678:|answered= 1380:Chervolina 1325:Chervolina 1283:using the 1234:|answered= 1102:Cc09091986 849:Mikecurry1 809:Mikecurry1 787:|answered= 754:Mikecurry1 598:. Thanks, 596:|THE_WSJ = 491:a year ago 442:discussion 270:discussion 2977:Jonesey95 2034:Wrrsimone 2004:as well. 1275:consensus 199:Infoboxes 190:Infoboxes 165:Infoboxes 83:if needed 66:Be polite 27:template. 21:talk page 3019:Thanks! 2719:Outdated 2487:Stanford 2460:Stanford 2298:Cheers, 2052:pinging 1753:Thjarkur 1715:Thjarkur 1635:contribs 1623:unsigned 1554:Regards. 1519:is by Ja 1498:contribs 1486:unsigned 1444:contribs 1432:unsigned 1204:Ergo Sum 1190:Regional 1140:unsigned 762:contribs 750:unsigned 723:unsigned 657:Pdyusmep 635:Pdyusmep 620:Pdyusmep 616:testcase 582:Pdyusmep 559:Pdyusmep 544:Pdyusmep 512:national 504:national 462:Pdyusmep 266:colleges 136:template 94:Archives 51:get help 2937:ElKevbo 2914:ElKevbo 2879:THE_WSJ 2852:US News 2844:US News 2774:ElKevbo 2682:ElKevbo 2295:or not? 2216:Infobox 2112:ElKevbo 2084:ElKevbo 2064:ElKevbo 2026:As per 1991:ElKevbo 1906:ElKevbo 1858:ElKevbo 1822:ElKevbo 1790:Heading 1738:ElKevbo 1644:ElKevbo 1611:ElKevbo 1587:ElKevbo 1551:ElKevbo 1525:ElKevbo 1517:article 1471:ElKevbo 1453:ElKevbo 1402:ElKevbo 1361:ElKevbo 1118:ElKevbo 1038:ElKevbo 1018:ElKevbo 516:However 477:ElKevbo 429:merging 2822:Forbes 2727:Jayron 2540:SWinxy 2495:SWinxy 2438:SWinxy 2420:SWinxy 2374:SWinxy 2266:SWinxy 2251:SWinxy 2236:Should 1757:(talk) 1719:(talk) 1627:H2O2O2 1490:H2O2O2 1436:H2O2O2 1280:before 994:WT:UNI 383:Alerts 264:, and 142:scale. 2831:Niche 2456:HBCUs 2347:about 2006:glman 1682:|ans= 1672:This 1238:|ans= 1228:This 791:|ans= 781:This 641:Corky 600:Corky 566:Corky 495:Corky 445:was " 431:with 134:This 79:Seek 3054:talk 3040:talk 3025:talk 3002:and 2981:talk 2975:. – 2941:talk 2926:talk 2918:Sdkb 2903:talk 2864:talk 2854:and 2826:ARWU 2824:and 2796:Sdkb 2790:{{u| 2778:talk 2753:Sdkb 2747:{{u| 2703:talk 2686:talk 2666:Sdkb 2660:{{u| 2645:talk 2620:talk 2583:talk 2544:talk 2524:Sdkb 2518:{{u| 2499:talk 2471:Sdkb 2465:{{u| 2442:talk 2424:talk 2404:Sdkb 2398:{{u| 2378:talk 2331:Sdkb 2325:{{u| 2307:Sdkb 2301:{{u| 2264:Hi @ 2255:talk 2191:Sdkb 2185:{{u| 2179:Done 2157:Sdkb 2151:{{u| 2116:talk 2095:Sdkb 2089:{{u| 2056:Sdkb 2010:talk 1995:talk 1973:Sdkb 1967:{{u| 1936:Sdkb 1930:{{u| 1925:Done 1910:talk 1890:Sdkb 1884:{{u| 1843:Sdkb 1837:{{u| 1826:talk 1804:Sdkb 1798:{{u| 1780:and 1742:talk 1703:talk 1648:talk 1631:talk 1591:talk 1529:talk 1494:talk 1457:talk 1440:talk 1406:talk 1384:talk 1365:talk 1348:talk 1329:talk 1299:talk 1295:MSGJ 1256:talk 1171:talk 1148:talk 1122:talk 1106:talk 1079:talk 1054:mann 1051:Zack 1036:and 1022:talk 1002:talk 989:mann 986:Zack 969:mann 966:Zack 951:and 938:talk 923:talk 869:talk 865:MSGJ 853:talk 834:talk 830:MSGJ 813:talk 758:talk 731:talk 698:and 661:talk 624:talk 586:talk 548:talk 530:and 528:ARWU 481:talk 466:talk 68:and 2916:, @ 2889:to 2856:WSJ 2838:on 2513:egg 1680:or 1236:or 1196:or 789:or 435:on 3071:: 3056:) 3042:) 3027:) 2998:, 2983:) 2943:) 2928:) 2905:) 2866:) 2802:}} 2780:) 2759:}} 2733:32 2724:-- 2705:) 2688:) 2672:}} 2647:) 2639:. 2637:}} 2631:{{ 2622:) 2585:) 2546:) 2530:}} 2501:) 2477:}} 2444:) 2436:. 2426:) 2410:}} 2380:) 2370:}} 2364:{{ 2337:}} 2313:}} 2293:}} 2287:{{ 2257:) 2219:}} 2213:{{ 2197:}} 2163:}} 2142:}} 2136:{{ 2118:) 2101:}} 2068:. 2060:, 2012:) 1997:) 1979:}} 1942:}} 1912:) 1896:}} 1849:}} 1828:) 1810:}} 1744:) 1705:) 1686:no 1650:) 1633:• 1593:) 1531:) 1496:• 1459:) 1442:• 1408:) 1386:) 1367:) 1350:) 1331:) 1297:· 1289:}} 1285:{{ 1258:) 1242:no 1200:. 1173:) 1150:) 1124:) 1108:) 1081:) 1066:) 1058:(/ 1024:) 1004:) 981:) 973:(/ 940:) 925:) 867:· 855:) 832:· 815:) 795:no 764:) 760:• 733:) 706:: 663:) 626:) 588:) 550:) 532:QS 483:) 468:) 449:". 260:, 49:; 3052:( 3038:( 3023:( 2979:( 2939:( 2924:( 2912:@ 2901:( 2862:( 2776:( 2701:( 2684:( 2643:( 2618:( 2581:( 2542:( 2497:( 2440:( 2422:( 2376:( 2253:( 2114:( 2076:: 2072:@ 2066:: 2062:@ 2058:: 2054:@ 2036:: 2032:@ 2008:( 1993:( 1908:( 1824:( 1740:( 1734:: 1730:@ 1701:( 1646:( 1629:( 1613:: 1609:@ 1589:( 1549:@ 1527:( 1521:j 1492:( 1469:@ 1455:( 1438:( 1404:( 1382:( 1363:( 1346:( 1327:( 1301:) 1293:( 1254:( 1169:( 1146:( 1120:( 1104:( 1077:( 1040:: 1032:@ 1020:( 1000:( 955:: 947:@ 936:( 921:( 871:) 863:( 851:( 836:) 828:( 811:( 756:( 729:( 659:( 653:: 649:@ 637:: 633:@ 622:( 612:: 608:@ 584:( 578:: 574:@ 561:: 557:@ 546:( 479:( 464:( 148:: 99:1 96:: 53:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index