528:- 220px. What kind of wiki standart is that? And i don't think there is a "standart width" of the infobox image at all. Arcadian, if there is any "cross-infobox" standart that is the principles by which the templates work. The use of parser functions or standart wiki styles - is not mandatory, they just set a flexible frame for the different infobox templates, as soon as we try to make that frame rigid, say - standart image widht, the same style rules or whatever, then we got a problem because not everything will fit in that frame - the different infoboxes provide different information, and if one setup looks well for one infobox it won't look that well for a different one. I bet you know all that.
551:. I've noticed that a lot of pages had ad-hoc rows added to the old manual template for indications, contraindications, and side-effects. Does anybody have an objection if I add optional fields to accomodate this information? (Currently, I've just sequestered this data into its own dedicated box, but in many cases that looks sloppy and inconsistent.) Other fields that might be useful could be "brand_name", "year_of_first_synthesis", "year_of_introduction", "medlineplus", "diseasesdb". Any thoughts? --
1007:). The problem lies with the parse parameters, for which there are two, to look for existance of an article (in this case we presume an image). However images may both be in english wikipedia image space and commons wiki and each parse parameter behaves differently for the two spaces. This might not be a problem if only a specified image name were being searched for, however the template allows for the imagename not to have been specified at all, in which case a default of PAGENAME.png is to be used.
31:
1403:, rather than just leaving a 'Px_only' or 'CD'. Given then the need to link these classifications to the relevant article in Knowledge (XXG) explaining them, I've added the categorisations to the list of terms recognised by the drugbox template. See new description of recognised terms and the simplification this allows to Phenobartical (
1046:
elegantly, i.e. nested tests with #if and #ifexists, with english and commons, with specified or default names (ie no attempt at image|{{PAGENAME}}.png) - ie 8-levels of testing - ughhh - perhaps when the migraine has settled I'll have another go, but meanwhile anyone care to offer a simpler approach to attempt ?
1116:
I would though seek advice of the likes of BorisTM (or anyone else we might know of) as to whether this is really going to work, i.e. confirm that coding really can be made to work for
English/Commons testing, if default parameter value issue is eliminated - no point in lots of work if it ain't going
561:
I think that the drugbox should only contain concise data, and that content requiring further discussion (e.g. indications, contraindications, adverse effects) should go in the main text only. If we add too many things to the drugbox, it just becomes too long and unwieldy – it's already getting quite
405:
Preferred, but the implementation still seems to be quite buggy – last time I tried uploading an SVG image that I'd made in
Illustrator, I had to juggle the settings repeatedly until I gave up and just used PNG. Also, most people don't have access to software that can export in SVG format. But if you
1310:
as the links. The reader can find out who the agencies are either by following the links or your wikilink for
Licence. I would imagine that most folk don't recognise what the "EMEA" is. The advantage of country codes is that, should other authorities be found that are relevant, they can be added. It
1203:
Disadvantages: The EMEA is relatively new but is handling much of the new drug applications in the EU since it is cheaper/quicker than going to each country. The FDA have been around a while but old drugs aren't online. Only relatively new drugs have complete information. Both sites will, of course,
1293:
Many thanks, David, for implementing this. I realise now that my text was contradicted by my examples: I recommend using the generic name for the FDA search; the brand name is essential for the EMEA link. The only disadvantage to using the generic name is that the FDA info for the original-brand is
1045:
A good idea if we were introducing this template afresh. However how many articles already rely upon this default for images which do exist - i.e. if we remove the default option, how many drug articles suddenly stop displaying a valid image ? I suspect the testing coding just needs to be done less
459:
Don't make numerous little changes here because this template is being used by many and its going to be used by even more articles, and any change however little it is puts presure on the serveres (recashing, etc) - the bigger the number of the articles that use the template the higher the presure.
456:
and check the changes in the "Add code" talk page by calling the template there. It would be a good idea that after saving a change to write "Testing" in the "Edit summary" and after you done with using the template to write "Done", so by checking the edit history those who want to use the template
124:
Your tool is also automatically pulling out melting points & smiles, are they really necessary for the majority of drugs (useful where physical properties or synthesis details interesting in their own right eg aspirin, or chloroform) as I initially imaged these optional fields would only rarely
829:
Is this really a good idea? Having colorized letters in a line of text is kind of distracting. It's especially bad that N is the same color as a hyperlink or wikilink and O is the same color as a dead wikilink. The only use I can see is to provide a color legend for the structural images, but from
765:
So it does (drats) - funny using the search box on each page acts differently for different images. For Image:Aspirin-skeletal.svg it fails to launch into the page, but offers a link to jump to it. Whereas searching for Image:Amoxicillin.png jumps directly there. Could you have a look at pages you
1195:
I have found the EMEA site difficult to navigate using
Firefox, though this may be due to my version of Java. It is OK on IE, and the individual drug page works fine on both browsers. Both sites work using of the brand name of the drug but the FDA site also allows searches with the generic name
1191:
Both sites contain a wide variety of information, some of which is very comprehensive. The FDA "Label
Information" and the EMEA "Product Information", where available, are very detailed. There is material aimed at the professional and also plain-English consumer information. This is a excellent
676:
is derived from an explicit definition (image=X.png) or as a default (PAGENAME.png). I also seem to have a variable response on trying to locate images within wikipedia (typing Image:xxx into the search box) with some images being jumped to directly, and for others a search result page is shown
359:
Can you give general method of splitting to assist for those browsers (I've just got
Internet Explorer which my machine just about copes with - any other software will completely seize me) - I can't compare appearances - next computer will I'm sure with suitable attached go-faster stripes :-)
582:
As for length of the cuirrent template, can we save one line with the drug's name? The 'Systematic name' section only currently contains the 'IUPAC name' which occupies its own separate line. Would it not be simpler to merge this into the section title as 'Systematic IUPAC name' ?
421:
Just a little reminder to all users, it's image NOT Image. Since image defaults to {{pagename}}.png, I spent ages trying to work out why my update wasn't working. Trouble is it was Image (I didn't actually insert it, I just modified an existing tag) therefore my tag had no effect!
1010:
So that's 2 possible sets of names (specified by parameter or else default name) to be tested across engish and commons wikis - we ended up being able to test for existance in any single part of this 4-way test, but not all simultaneously. Canone care to have a further go, see
1474:
To be fair, you are being very cynical, unicode is by far the most common way of formatting units and is easier to understand for people who are not familiar with html syntax (i.e. most people). I'm sure we all agree having a mixture of different syntaxes is not optimal.
230:) had complete ATC codes then no DrugBank card would have a complete ATC code. Thanks for telling me otherwise. What I've done is when ATC codes are complete (ie, 7 characters long), I've included them in the template; otherwise, I've left them out. Sound about right? --
727:
Ah Image.Aspirin-skeletal.svg does not exist, which explains why only the image2 is shown ! So not problem of the template but of image name chosen, phew :-) Now whatever happened to aspirin's line drawing ? I'll trawl back through the aspirin article's history...
320:
Thanks for the error report -- seems DrugBank's strict XHTML wasn't so strict after all. Should be fixed now that I've added some extra filtering. Also, "smiles" and "melting_point" are now shown only if you tick the "show extended fields" checkbox. Cheers,
147:
You're right -- not all fields are relevant to all drugs. I just assumed folks would remove the unnecessary ones manually. I suppose I could add a "minimal fields" option that would remove them automatically, but I don't like the arbitrary definition of
839:
It is almost impossible to see a trailing S(ulphur) because its color is so similar to the default background. I strongly object to this discrimination against the visually impaired and the colorblind. Please replace the colors with tints, instead.
1192:
reliable source for article information but also contains much that makes it a worthwhile "External link" since there is no way you could include all the info. Both sites are kept up-to-date with the latest changes to prescribing/licensing practice.
1096:
Don't personally know much about bots, but if could be done then yes probably simpler. NB caveat: need someone with advanced knowledge of the parseparameters and
English/Commons subtleties to guide us here (ie if this really is going to work).
1557:
The unicode is almost always used for things like cm³, I am just cleaning up the relatively few articles that don't, I should make it clear that I am not converting all possible instances of superscipt to unicode, just things similar to cm³.
261:
Also, for fields like "pregnancy_category", which appear by default even when unpopulated but aren't populated from DrugBank, I'd recommend including the field in the output, so that it is easier to fill in the field manually later.
1261:
parameters which each take just the search word to be sought - can people just check that this works with items that are not just a single word - i.e. will we need request that editors use underscore in place of any spaces ?
803:
The image that doesn't show up is on commons - of what i was able to grasp so far (i might be wrong thou) you can't use "ifexist" to check for that because the page actually does not exist on en.wiki, instead you have to use
168:
Element definition wouldn't be difficult to implement, but I can't think of a good reason to prefer it over specifying the formula longhand. The only advantage I can think of is that element definition avoids the <sub:
128:
You used the chemical formula option, but a recent alternative was element definition added by user BorisTM. Is this either easer or better ? (I like the look, but am undecided whether this is necessarily easier in all
1567:
Also, scanning the database shows that, of the occurances I was changing, the unicode is almost 10 times as as common as the equivalent sup markup (the copy of the database used pre-dates any changes I made).
684:
Hi David, you made some changes today to the drugbox template - getting rid of the red link if no image exists. This is great, but it has had the effect that some pages employing the use of the drugbox (e.g.
1199:
So I recommend that the parameter for the EMEA site be the brand name and the parameter for the FDA site be the generic name. The template code needs to allow the option for either or both to be missing.
1100:
It needs identify firstly articles using template:drugbox, select those that have no image parameter defined (either no "image =" with undefined value or no undefined parameter included at all), and then
271:
Presently you can display all fields by checking the "display all template fields" box. As a more long-term solution, I'll be implementing the standard/extended fields idea that David mentioned above. --
132:
Your tool produces a result on a single line, obvious advantage is more compact, would display on separate lines be easier for others to follow ? (I weakly prefer compactness to more expansive display).
1324:. The underscore is needed for the template parameter and works fine. The EMEA site uses brand names so two words are rare. When they do occur, their url is composed of the adjoined words. For example:
573:
I generally concur with
Techelf and feel side-effects. contraindications, years and disease links have no place in this infobox. I raise 3 points - please do add indented comments to each of these :-)
1452:
way of superscripting that we've always used just got changed to the unicode "superscripted 3" character. Is unicode the way we want to be doing scientific/mathematical exponent notation now?
1435:
for
Schedule I-VIII. If anyone knows of their non-scheduled scheme of classification (i.e. OTC, Pharmacy or normal prescription-only) then let me know and I can add it to the template coding.
1321:
1307:
1171:
1183:
1159:
1596:
OK. To answer the original question: I'm not aware of unicode symbols for superscripts other than 123 (see the symbol list the bottom of the page when you edit an article). The
598:
I agree with merging "systematic name" and "IUPAC name" into a single line, but I propose that we use the label "IUPAC name" or "systematic name" (either of which would link to
1111:
or search to see if a suitable image file can be located and if not then leave in place "image = " ready for the modified drugbox template to then ignore the blank parameter.
1600:
uses the HTML formatting for its symbols and I'm not aware of a change to the MOS in this regard. I'd be happier if bots could quote MOS guidelines in their edit summaries.
579:
Similar for the purposes of classifing the drug, how about a 'Drug Class' field which would be used to specify the drug as a gluticorticoid, chemotherapy, antibiotic etc ?
1485:
446:
to do so (i don't use that template for anything but for test grounds or "template sand-box" if you want to call it) - just replace its current code with the code for
485:
Table's 280px, image's used to be 250px but
Arcadian dropped it down to 220px. Why? What's the good of having smaller images and all that white space around them? --
1303:
Regarding appearance: I think the word "data" is redundant and should be dropped - all the info in this table is data. I wonder if the RHS might be better with just
814:, according to the parser functions guide. I tried to find a solution in the small time span that i had before going to bed but i'm tired and i need to get flat. --
1462:
Don't assume that bot edits (a) make sense (b) reflect consensus or (c) indicate anything other than the personal tastes of the bot user/author. Call me cynical.
1597:
94:
Hi there! I've just created a tool for automating the process of filling out the drugbox template. Given a DataBank accession number (eg, APRD00109 for
1579:
in articles that are full of and other sup/sub formatting of numbers. Perhaps you're confusing me with the other commenter on the bot's talk page?
1294:
likely to be much greater than for the generics - and the reader may be confused as to which link in the search results to pick. What do you think?
1272:
Before anyone gets too excited and starts applying the new parameters to loads of pages, have a look at how the coding currently formats for
1223:
I'd support it. Navigation in the FDA website is pretty convoluted, though – I personally found it easier to navigate around the EMEA pages.
985:
Could someone make the image optional, so there is no ugly red link at every newly created drug article?? I am not sure how to do this... --
81:
76:
71:
59:
1432:
777:
I've just had a look at chloramphenicol. Its first image is a PNG, so it doesn't seem that the SVG format is the root of the problem.
349:
Guys don't forget to check how the names look in Firefox or Netscape - they don't cut the long words the way Opera and Explorer do. --
1488:
that there are only unicode for superscript-1/2/3, chemistry articles should use the HTMLish form of sup/sub numbering exclusively.
406:
have any advice on easily getting SVG structures drawn with ChemDraw (and exported via Illustrator), it'd be much appreciated. -
374:(line break) tags pretty empirically. I try to keep related chemical terms together and end lines at hyphens where possible (cf.
1028:
And what if the standard PAGENAME.png would be removed? So that people will be required to explicitly specify an image name? --
664:
exists, as currently a red link is shown if it does not. I've reverted back and copied the code across to the template sandbox
1071:
could probably be used for the transition, to modify the drug articles which depend on the default image being there ?? --
753:
Sorry if I've wrongly accused you! I just noticed this problem this afternoon. I thought you'd like to know either way.
938:? This could simply be ignorance on my part, as I know less than nothing about template syntax, but the time frame fits.
1145:
227:
214:
1280:. If people agree to styling and don't find fault on some testing ("Show Preview") in other articles, then ..... :-)
436:
People, if you want to test for how any new change is going to affect this template, or any template in general, use
951:
made no difference. Clearly something has changed - also seems not to do with oxygen, but new lines after nitrogen.
602:) instead of "systematic IUPAC name". All IUPAC names are systematic, thus "systematic IUPAC name" is redundant. --
47:
38:
17:
1325:
1149:
1144:. There are two major licensing authorities that I've found that make drug information easily accessible: The US
872:
739:
173:
There's an option to "fill template vertically" that puts each parameter on its own line. Does that do the trick?
1068:
867:
Would it be OK to expand Mol. to Molecular and cat to category? Seems like they will both fit without wrapping.
155:
How about "Standard" (vs "Extended"), given these other ones only existed in the last week since I added them ?
935:
285:
These standard/extended fields are now implemented with the addition of the "show extended fields" checkbox. --
903:
for examples). I have accessed several pages which use the extended form (ie, | C = | H = | N = etc.) on both
194:
Oh what an idiot I am - of course - yes, thanks. For drugbox only, could vertical be the default option ? :-)
921:
Yeah I've also noticed a problem in Firefox and Safari, seemingly with the display of the oxygen character. -
547:
I think I've now got most of the articles converted to the new template, at least for the drugs that have an
1414:
Let me know if this needs any adjustment to the formating, or indeed to teh very principle enacted here :-)
669:
395:
I suggest you make SVG the preferred image type. SVG is the preferred image type on wikipedia for diagrams
213:
and noticed that the ATC code(s) aren't populated (found at the bottom of the "Drug Category" field on the
1577:
I have no problems with unicode in general, just with the blanket conversion of things like cm<sup: -->
1174:
517:
496:
672:
which shows that for some pages only image2 is shown. Nor does it seem to be exclusively whether the 1st
521:
500:
1012:
790:
665:
440:
869:
808:
677:
indicating a single entry that I must then select as a two-part process - is this a related issue ?
1304:
1186:
1162:
245:
209:
This is wonderful - thank you so much for building this. One bit of feedback: I just tried it with
922:
668:
and displayed, as examples, the chloramphenicol & cyclophosphamide in the sandbox's talk page
563:
471:
407:
379:
1224:
965:
939:
912:
307:
also be switched to extended only. Also "APRD00248" for amoxicillin seems to cause it to error:
1607:
1583:
1572:
1562:
1552:
1479:
1469:
1456:
1439:
1418:
1386:
1284:
1266:
1247:
1236:
1227:
1217:
1121:
1075:
1050:
1032:
1019:
1000:
989:
968:
955:
942:
925:
915:
908:
857:
846:
834:
818:
797:
781:
778:
770:
757:
754:
732:
720:
704:
701:
647:
638:
634:
623:
611:
607:
587:
566:
555:
534:
507:
489:
474:
464:
426:
410:
399:
382:
364:
353:
330:
326:
311:
294:
290:
280:
276:
266:
252:
239:
235:
221:
198:
187:
183:
159:
137:
111:
107:
470:
I'm probably one of the culprits, so thanks for pointing out the Add_code template. Cheers. -
1072:
1029:
986:
891:
There seems to be a problem with the "Formula" field, the output is breaking awkwardly (see
743:
525:
450:
99:
1605:
1467:
1436:
1415:
1384:
1281:
1263:
1244:
1215:
1118:
1047:
1016:
952:
904:
853:
842:
794:
767:
747:
729:
717:
644:
584:
361:
308:
195:
156:
134:
1367:
1362:
1357:
1352:
1569:
1559:
1476:
620:
423:
396:
1399:
I've noticed editors adding specific controlled drug categorisations to some drugs eg
98:), it pulls a DataBank card and produces a filled-out drugbox template. Try it out at
1400:
1273:
1233:
1155:
896:
552:
504:
263:
249:
218:
996:
815:
630:
603:
531:
486:
461:
350:
322:
286:
272:
231:
210:
179:
125:
be useful to the majority of readers - but thats just my own penny's worth view :-)
103:
95:
1580:
1549:
1453:
1337:
The easiest way to navigate the EMEA site, and the list of drugs, is from their
1167:
900:
892:
831:
713:
503:
both default to 200px. I wouldn't object to making the table smaller, though. --
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1207:
BTW: The word "Licence" is the noun in British English, "License" is the verb.
576:
An abbreviated 'Indications' field after the 'Routes' would not be unreasonable
1601:
1463:
1380:
1243:
Support - better a link to regulatory authorities than drug campany websites.
1211:
1179:
599:
375:
742:
exists! The same problem occurs at many drug pages (although not all - see
1196:(active ingredient), which lists generic variants where they are licensed.
830:
what I've seen, not many images used in the drugbox are colorized at all.
716:
as my test page for 2 images and that works - will look into this further.
877:
548:
1338:
686:
1108:) - but kind of messy as implies that such asn image has been uploaded
766:
tested to see if this is a problem with .svg files rather than .png ?
947:
Could not see why interwiki link within noinclude tags should - and
530:
I would definately object making the table of drugbox smaller. --
226:
I made the dumb assumption that because none of my test cases (eg
930:
Might be a stretch, but could it have something to do with this
880:
25:
1311:
also makes it unnessary to include the codes in parenthesis.
144:
Thanks! Let me see if I can reply to each of your points:
495:
To get closer to Knowledge (XXG) standards. For example,
100:
http://diberri.dyndns.org/wikipedia/templates/?type=dbid
1408:
1404:
1277:
1004:
961:
948:
931:
851:
To this end, I have divided all the RGB values by two.
1140:
I propose a new row in the drugbox table for the drug
995:Yes 1 tried misserably to do this previously, and
457:will know if they can use it or they have to wait.
1210:Feedback on this proposal would be very welcome.
680:I copy from my talk page a thread about this:
1598:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style (mathematics)
8:
660:I tried in last couple days to test whether
789:So can anyone advise on my coding error at
1320:Here's a two word link on the FDA site:
1001:User talk:BorisTM#Template:Drugbox image
746:for one not affected - I just checked
1395:Controlled drug status in legal fields
373:I've had to manually add <br /: -->
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
825:Colorized element symbols in formula
1433:Controlled Drugs and Substances Act
619:How about systematic (IUPAC) name?
120:- well done ! Some quick thoughts:
24:
712:So it does - however I had used
29:
1608:18:56, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
1584:02:17, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
1573:08:24, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
1563:08:03, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
1553:20:44, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
1480:15:26, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
1470:13:49, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
1457:13:02, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
1440:04:00, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
1419:19:10, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
215:Drugbank page for Streptomycin
90:Automated filling of drugboxes
1:
1387:08:46, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
1285:02:35, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
1267:02:08, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
1248:02:08, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
1237:23:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
1228:16:25, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
1218:13:38, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
1122:01:08, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
1076:18:26, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
1051:17:07, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
1033:16:48, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
1020:16:21, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
990:15:30, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
1146:Food and Drug Administration
750:and there's a problem there.
643:Concur - and so changed :-)
629:Ooh, I think I like that. --
969:23:00, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
956:02:17, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
943:00:36, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
656:Testing for image existance
1625:
999:had a valient go too (see
926:09:59, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
916:21:26, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
740:Image:Aspirin-skeletal.svg
700:. Can you fix it? Cheers
18:Template talk:Infobox drug
1150:European Medicines Agency
858:22:46, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
847:21:58, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
835:16:11, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
819:02:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
798:17:01, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
782:16:44, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
771:16:23, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
758:16:16, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
733:16:07, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
721:16:04, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
705:15:43, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
588:22:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
567:11:12, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
556:14:39, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
535:05:21, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
508:02:21, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
490:23:37, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
475:10:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
465:02:06, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
427:21:51, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
411:07:50, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
400:21:51, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
383:08:29, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
365:01:40, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
354:01:21, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
331:05:05, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
312:01:54, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
295:01:41, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
281:15:53, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
267:12:02, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
253:16:16, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
248:, and it worked great! --
240:15:53, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
222:11:54, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
199:22:56, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
188:22:41, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
160:22:56, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
138:18:32, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
112:17:06, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
1341:. For ease of reference:
936:Template:OrganicBox atom
911:and they look the same.
648:23:23, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
639:22:34, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
624:14:01, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
612:03:40, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
1484:If mixing is bad, then
1152:(EMEA). Some examples:
960:Seems fixed now. Maybe
520:sets 200px as default,
432:Changes to the template
317:(Error message snipped)
1450:I see the <sup: -->
1446:Superscript formatting
670:Template talk:Add code
518:Template:Album infobox
497:Template:Album infobox
481:Table and image widths
1104:Define the image (as
522:Template:Infobox Book
501:Template:Infobox Book
378:). Hope that helps. -
42:of past discussions.
1548:looks pretty poor.
1204:improve with time.
562:lengthy as it is. -
246:Aminosalicylic acid
244:I just tried it at
1106:{ {PAGENAME} }.png
1533:
1532:
1136:New Licence field
1013:Template:Add code
791:Template:Add code
666:Template:Add code
318:
87:
86:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1616:
1507:Chemical formula
1504:
1503:
1322:Acyclovir Sodium
813:
807:
744:cyclophosphamide
526:Template:Drugbox
455:
449:
445:
439:
316:
68:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1624:
1623:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1615:
1614:
1613:
1521:
1517:
1513:
1448:
1397:
1253:Ok- I've added
1138:
983:
964:did the trick?
889:
887:"Formula" field
865:
827:
811:
805:
748:chloramphenicol
658:
545:
483:
453:
447:
443:
437:
434:
419:
393:
347:
118:Brilliant stuff
92:
64:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1622:
1620:
1612:
1611:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1586:
1578:3</sup: -->
1565:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1531:
1530:
1527:
1523:
1522:
1519:
1515:
1511:
1508:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1451:3</sup: -->
1447:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1425:
1407:) and Heroin (
1396:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1365:
1360:
1355:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1326:Infanrix Penta
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1288:
1287:
1251:
1250:
1240:
1239:
1230:
1148:(FDA) and the
1137:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1109:
1102:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1023:
1022:
1015:sandbox area.
1008:
982:
981:Image optional
979:
978:
977:
976:
975:
974:
973:
972:
971:
888:
885:
864:
861:
826:
823:
822:
821:
788:
786:
785:
774:
773:
762:
761:
751:
736:
735:
724:
723:
709:
708:
657:
654:
653:
652:
651:
650:
617:
616:
615:
614:
593:
592:
591:
590:
580:
577:
570:
569:
544:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
529:
516:A standart!?!
511:
510:
482:
479:
478:
477:
458:
433:
430:
418:
415:
414:
413:
392:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
368:
367:
346:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:
319:
259:
258:
257:
256:
255:
228:indomethacin's
206:
205:
204:
203:
202:
201:
176:
175:
174:
171:
165:
164:
163:
162:
150:
149:
141:
140:
130:
126:
91:
88:
85:
84:
79:
74:
69:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1621:
1609:
1606:
1603:
1599:
1595:
1585:
1582:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1571:
1566:
1564:
1561:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1551:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1528:
1525:
1524:
1509:
1506:
1505:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1487:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1478:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1468:
1465:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1455:
1445:
1441:
1438:
1434:
1431:with link to
1430:
1426:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1417:
1412:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1401:Phenobarbital
1394:
1388:
1385:
1382:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1369:
1366:
1364:
1361:
1359:
1356:
1354:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1340:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1309:
1306:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1286:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1274:Levetiracetam
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1265:
1260:
1256:
1249:
1246:
1242:
1241:
1238:
1235:
1231:
1229:
1226:
1225:Fvasconcellos
1222:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1216:
1213:
1208:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1188:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1176:
1173:
1170:(Herceptin):
1169:
1165:
1164:
1161:
1157:
1156:Levetiracetam
1153:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1135:
1123:
1120:
1115:
1110:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1098:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1077:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1052:
1049:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1034:
1031:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1021:
1018:
1014:
1009:
1006:
1002:
998:
994:
993:
992:
991:
988:
980:
970:
967:
966:Fvasconcellos
963:
959:
958:
957:
954:
950:
949:on quick test
946:
945:
944:
941:
940:Fvasconcellos
937:
933:
932:recent change
929:
928:
927:
924:
920:
919:
918:
917:
914:
913:Fvasconcellos
910:
906:
902:
898:
897:glibenclamide
894:
886:
884:
882:
879:
875:
874:
871:
863:Abbreviations
862:
860:
859:
856:
855:
849:
848:
845:
844:
837:
836:
833:
824:
820:
817:
810:
802:
801:
800:
799:
796:
792:
783:
780:
776:
775:
772:
769:
764:
763:
759:
756:
752:
749:
745:
741:
738:
737:
734:
731:
726:
725:
722:
719:
715:
711:
710:
706:
703:
699:
696:
692:
688:
683:
682:
681:
678:
675:
671:
667:
663:
655:
649:
646:
642:
641:
640:
636:
632:
628:
627:
626:
625:
622:
613:
609:
605:
601:
597:
596:
595:
594:
589:
586:
581:
578:
575:
574:
572:
571:
568:
565:
560:
559:
558:
557:
554:
550:
542:
536:
533:
527:
523:
519:
515:
514:
513:
512:
509:
506:
502:
498:
494:
493:
492:
491:
488:
480:
476:
473:
469:
468:
467:
466:
463:
452:
442:
431:
429:
428:
425:
416:
412:
409:
404:
403:
402:
401:
398:
391:SVG preferred
390:
384:
381:
377:
372:
371:
370:
369:
366:
363:
358:
357:
356:
355:
352:
344:
332:
328:
324:
315:
314:
313:
310:
306:
305:melting_point
302:
299:Thanks - can
298:
297:
296:
292:
288:
284:
283:
282:
278:
274:
270:
269:
268:
265:
260:
254:
251:
247:
243:
242:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
224:
223:
220:
216:
212:
208:
207:
200:
197:
193:
192:
191:
190:
189:
185:
181:
177:
172:
167:
166:
161:
158:
154:
153:
152:
151:
146:
145:
143:
142:
139:
136:
131:
127:
123:
122:
121:
119:
114:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
89:
83:
80:
78:
75:
73:
70:
67:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1449:
1428:
1413:
1409:compare here
1405:compare here
1398:
1258:
1254:
1252:
1209:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1178:
1166:
1154:
1141:
1139:
1117:to work :-)
1105:
1005:this attempt
997:User:BorisTM
984:
890:
868:
866:
852:
850:
841:
838:
828:
787:
697:
694:
690:
689:) only show
679:
673:
661:
659:
631:David Iberri
618:
604:David Iberri
546:
484:
435:
420:
394:
348:
323:David Iberri
304:
300:
287:David Iberri
273:David Iberri
232:David Iberri
211:Streptomycin
180:David Iberri
117:
115:
104:David Iberri
96:indomethacin
93:
65:
43:
37:
1529:1.18 g/cm³
1437:David Ruben
1427:I've added
1416:David Ruben
1282:David Ruben
1264:David Ruben
1245:David Ruben
1232:Support. --
1168:Trastuzumab
1119:David Ruben
1048:David Ruben
1017:David Ruben
953:David Ruben
901:paracetamol
893:pancuronium
795:David Ruben
768:David Ruben
730:David Ruben
718:David Ruben
714:amoxycillin
645:David Ruben
585:David Ruben
524:sets none,
362:David Ruben
309:David Ruben
196:David Ruben
157:David Ruben
135:David Ruben
36:This is an
1276:following
1259:licence_US
1255:licence_EU
1182:(Lyrica):
1180:Pregabalin
1158:(Keppra):
873:Farmbrough
600:IUPAC name
543:New fields
376:irbesartan
148:"minimal".
102:. Cheers,
1424:re Canada
1278:this edit
878:7 August
621:Copperman
424:Nil Einne
397:Nil Einne
345:The names
82:Archive 5
77:Archive 4
72:Archive 3
66:Archive 2
60:Archive 1
1429:legal_CA
1368:EMEA S-Z
1363:EMEA M-R
1358:EMEA G-L
1353:EMEA A-F
1234:Arcadian
854:James S.
843:James S.
553:Arcadian
549:ATC code
505:Arcadian
441:Add code
264:Arcadian
250:Arcadian
219:Arcadian
178:Cheers,
1526:Density
1339:SiteMap
1142:Licence
1101:either:
923:Techelf
905:Firefox
883:(GMT).
687:aspirin
564:Techelf
472:Techelf
451:Drugbox
408:Techelf
380:Techelf
116:Gosh -
39:archive
1581:DMacks
1570:Martin
1560:Martin
1550:DMacks
1477:Martin
1454:DMacks
876:15:12
832:DMacks
809:exists
691:image2
301:smiles
129:cases)
1602:Colin
1486:given
1464:Colin
1381:Colin
1212:Colin
816:Boris
698:image
674:image
662:image
532:Boris
487:Boris
462:Boris
417:Image
351:Boris
217:). --
16:<
1257:and
1187:EMEA
1175:EMEA
1163:EMEA
1003:and
962:this
907:and
899:and
881:2006
870:Rich
693:and
635:talk
608:talk
327:talk
303:and
291:talk
277:talk
236:talk
184:talk
108:talk
1610:¹²³
1411:).
1184:FDA
1172:FDA
1160:FDA
1069:bot
934:to
779:Ben
755:Ben
702:Ben
695:not
460:--
169:-->
1516:12
1308:US
1305:EU
1073:WS
1067:A
1030:WS
987:WS
909:IE
895:,
812:}}
806:{{
793:?
637:)
610:)
499:,
454:}}
448:{{
444:}}
438:{{
329:)
293:)
279:)
262:--
238:)
186:)
170:s.
110:)
1604:°
1520:4
1518:O
1514:H
1512:6
1510:C
1466:°
1383:°
1328:.
1214:°
784:.
760:.
707:.
633:(
606:(
325:(
289:(
275:(
234:(
182:(
106:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.