21:
76:
Since there have been no comments I have amended the wording. It still gives rather muddled message. Three things are mentioned -- tabularising, improving and pruning -- but in practice it's often not obvious whether the second two are supposed to apply, or whether the person adding it just didn't
55:
The wording here -- "This list should be changed into a table format to meet
Knowledge (XXG)'s quality standards" -- makes it sound as if a decision has been made by some editorial board and this is an instruction to implement it. In fact, this template is usually a
36:
60:
by the person who added it that the list might be better as a table. Others, indeed the consensus, may disagree. I propose that the wording is adjusted accordingly.
78:
61:
27:
82:
65:
86:
69:
20:
15:
8:
7:
31:
26:This template was considered for
14:
19:
1:
104:
87:01:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
70:04:49, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
77:notice the small print.
42:no consensus to merge
34:. The result of the
48:
47:
95:
33:
32:2016 November 12
23:
16:
103:
102:
98:
97:
96:
94:
93:
92:
53:
12:
11:
5:
101:
99:
91:
90:
79:86.142.110.189
52:
49:
46:
45:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
100:
88:
84:
80:
75:
74:
73:
71:
67:
63:
62:86.134.55.211
59:
50:
43:
39:
38:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
57:
54:
41:
35:
58:suggestion
37:discussion
28:deletion
51:Wording
40:was "
83:talk
66:talk
30:on
85:)
72:.
68:)
44:".
89:.
81:(
64:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
