986:
replaced by a flatter structure "Procedures, Drug1, Drug2". In case of the "Pathogenic bacteria" template, i think it would make sense to just name the category "antibiotics" in stead of "treatment". Since there are no therapeutics for the olfactory and gustatory (taste) system, we could perhaps just leave out the treatment section in stead of a "-". I also put trauma next to diseases, before signs&symptoms, eponyms, etc. I'm not too sure about the ♂ and ♀ signs for male/female reproductive system. We also don't put a <3 in front of the cardiac system. And again various small fixes. I can't believe such an important part of wikipedia was in such a... diseased condition.
3533:
alternative layout you presented and perhaps we don't need to get rid of the internal (x, y, z) links, we could tweak it to make it more obvious that it's an index somehow, what is your opinion about enclosing your example box in a collapse box and making the text smaller? With the text provided as an index like in your example, there's no reason to get rid of the (x, y, z) links, and it could in fact be quite helpful if we include it with a clear demarcation. Sorry that my reasoning wasn't clear; I hope that my response makes more sense in terms of your original statements now! Will have a look at the expansions. --
554:
anatomical structure and disease has some kind of euphemistic medieval lay name that physicians have to use not to sound snobby to patients (ok, personal frustration). The whole non-congenital seems odd to me. In cases where it's really important, perhaps mention acquired disease? Or the specific transfer mechanism. Personally, i think the navboxes should provide all the links users need and the TA/TH/Gray's codes should be made obsolete by the quality of the articles and the navboxes. I guess my main question is: how can i contribute. This page doesn't seem very active so please ping me by inserting
1772:
worry about visible length is not founded. Lastly, as you state it is the abbreviations rather than the header row which is the cause of the size, and the header row is quite useful to make this area visually distinct. And any changes we make will compromise the design choices we've made thus far, which are good choices. So I concede here, and think we can deploy first and see what users think. If there is an uproar about them being confusing or not distinct or some other facet (this being WP and all) we can adjust accordingly. --
697:). The draft page has them expanded into words; you are invited to check & improve those. Then putting this from draft into the live templates would be an improvement already! (this RfC is towards a conclusion for this). Next, we might want to improve the content (e.g. remove anatomy details?, as is discussed above). Also, we I proposed to get rid of the background colors, back to navbox-blues. That is, for these 36 blocks only. And we might change the layout from 4 columns into something else (see
2366:, i'm done reading through them. I think we have four open issues "actively being discussed" in the wording part: put third level in italics, inverse: add a common Latin word, tumor/neoplasia, signs and symptoms/eponyms. Then there's one issue, just above, to make a good plan of how to push it live, which technical checks and if there's a way we can share in the credits when going live. I hope we can quickly reach consensus, close them and then push the templates live.
1644:. It's not uncommon for a medical or anatomical article to have 3-4 navboxes. If each navbox has 3-4 embedded navboxes like that in the link, they will double to triple in size, and there'll be (as in "Bone") a large amount of duplication. I guess you're right in stating that we can make them more readable and then it's up to editors to determine how navboxes are used. If we were to included our embedded sections as collapsible that would also make a difference. --
31:
2700:
push such a drastic change to the templates live without first leaving a note on the talk pages. We should have thought about it earlier, but we don't need to delay imho. There doesn't need to be a substantial time between the notification on the talk pages and pushing the templates live, as there have been plenty attempts to get anyone interested involved here. And the first person noticing this neede fixing was years ago.
3898:
need the 36-overview for (and however big our new blocks are: these other 35 are not in there, nor is a hint to them). There is another thing. We might decide that we remove the bracketed anatomy lists (you mentioned; it is still open I guess). If we do so, or if others do so six months from now, these sublistings are removed completely, nowhere to be found. That might be OK for a template, for the
3107:). Approach I propose: A. let's get the words-for-abbreviations right and push them into live, as that's an improvement in any way. B. Keep those (x, y, z) links if they (B1) link to an article, and (B2) the list is not impractically long to be complete (max 5 to 7?). This implements right away that it it does not have an content article/category, it is not important enough for a navbox. -
1722:(title) row in each block, instead of the four unheaded columns. So when a parent template has multiple blocks, there are three headers added (see the linked sandbox). That might be too much. A better result could be having one header only, and somehow make three subgroups (with the three header texts in a lefthand column, regular navbox style). This would require extra block codings,
1744:, a single line text cannot be expected even in the old format. In the old column structure, expanded abbreviations would yield multiple rows (rough counting: old set of 36 had 3163 characters, new one has 10700: expansion is factor of 3.5). That says that old column style would easily expand into three rows by wrapping. For this reason, a lot of the extra space occupied is
4856:. It's the template on whose talkpage we are writing here. My point is: it should not be a template but an article, and we should link to it in the 36 blocks. Actually, the current 'old' version does so. To get back to the point: PizzaMan, do you think we should add (=keep) a link to that higher overview, or not? In the template, it could be in the title like: "Index of
4667:
readers need to "grasp" there are more templates, if they are interested in those topics I think it is up to them to peruse them. Secondly, these navboxes are embedded in other navboxes. So a user sees them in the context of a template about drugs relating to bone. I think it is excessive to have every such template link to a grand overview of templates.
901:, i see you're already working on it. Should we also insert the v/t/e (view/discuss/edit) bit? In fact, on second thought, i'd be in favor of leaving out the "medical systems" bit from 1b, but including the v/t/e bit. Unless that's made obsolete by the v/t/e at the top of the template. I'll stop editing for now, so there won't be edit conflicts.
4332:
4317:
4183:
4159:
2847:
2798:
4722:: imo that sub-topic (block header) like 'bone and cartilage' appears not from the article it is used in, but it is added more or less from the outside. Like other navigation boxes have "Category:topic X" and "Portal:topic X" links at the bottom. That is: one link to parent and sibling topics. I will chew on your response some more.
3518:, not by space or layout ideas. Once information reasoning is clear (in/out; major/minor, sub, ...), there will be a layout to follow. Not the other way around. Last note: could you take care of more expansions? Some five boxes are still carrying abbreviations. I don't know enough, and everything needs a smart check anyway. -
3121:
I'm still not so sure. By making everything small abbreviations, it is like we are trying to compress what is in a full template into a tiny bottom template. I don't think every article needs a link to every template in the series. Looking at the example above, WP:PNS, I think instead of "anat (h / r
4673:
Yes I agree here. If we are going to link to a list of templates, then it should be in article space. Even if we don't link directly, it would be a useful page to have to link to on other venues (eg in documentation, on the WPMED and WPANATOMY pages, and so forth). I agree with you that it is useful
3469:
Just some ideas. Firstly is to make clear that this is an index of the topic area (explaining why it'll redirect to templates). Second is to make it smaller / collapsible, or some way of making it distinct that it's a separate area and won't link to articles. If we use the format you've proposed, we
3324:
the anatomy subtopic #1. From such a page, it is easy to think that a Reader would want to click to a sibling topic: from
Anatomy of the Head to Anatomy of the Torso. A very reasonable navigation quest. Exactly for this click, they should be there (say, a "horizontal" connection, or "sibling topic"
1771:
Thanks for your bigger picture summar and I think you make a a number of good points. Firstly as you state above, multiple navboxes are not used that commonly. Secondly, when multiple navboxes are present they are collapsed, so users will only see the "Index of..." when they select a navbox -- so my
970:
Thanks for your help, PizzaMan, the links are looking very good, and thanks for rewording the drug codes. I think you can propose moves as you note them, or at least leave a list here so we can move them all later. We're also havign a discussion below about how to present the "systems" or if we need
800:
Coffee should be mentioned under olfactory drugs ;-) Ok, i shouldn't joke around. To my opinion, in the current state, the templates are near useless and put wikipedia to shame, and while i can see the point of taking careful and small steps, i would consider this the kind of emergency that warrants
4704:
is today). The content will be formed into a List article (sections, bullets, indents). The navbox appearance (blue backgrounds) will be stripped. That will be edited later on, because first we want the texts & lists to be OK (that core Draft page we edit is the defining place, the rest will be
4539:
I propose to create article "List of medical systems". Basically it should contain the draft page's content, but not in navbox format. It can simply say: "In medicine, the next systems are approached as a whole for description, disagnosis and treatment: (+the list)". If there is a better name than
3874:
Demo 1 and 1-B are bigger, so there's not really a need to link to a page with links on it. We made the list of systems article because the templates were too small to hold everything, right? So now that the templates are bigger, we don't necessarily need the list of systems article at all, because
3815:
Oh boy! I really like Draft 1. Eminently readable. I feel we need some way to make it visually distinct that this is a meta-navbox, rather than a part of every template (otherwise it will look fairly confusing). Do you have any ideas? Some ideas would be background colours (uniform for all) or font
3563:
the index is presented in a reasonable and accessible manner, viz. one that a user can actually read. If we only have a single line, then I would argue that there's not enough space for the (x, y, z) links and they're not as useful as the parent links. There are benefits and negatives to both sides
3036:
Yes. And for the reader it is useless because the overview (a.k.a. key) is nowhere near (a graph that shows color-per-bodypart). It is distracting even. However, for now I want to keep these colors (untouched) outside of this topic (= those elsewhere in the templates can stay for now). Would be too
2699:
I've put a reminder on talk pages of all individual templates. On a few of them someone already left a remark along the lines of "what is going on with this template". I pinged those people. I'm sorry if there wasn't consensus for this, but this is a major change, and in my humble opinion, we can't
2301:
Did a lot of edits, but i didn't finish yet. I'll try to finish today, but i propose we wait with pushing live until i did a full check. And we find a moment to be online together so we can each push 1/3 of the templates live. We could coordinate that over e-mail or some kind of chat. I live in the
941:
wrt the v-t-e edit links: I plan to have them in template space (so you can click to edit that block), but don't show in article space. See demo in bones (top) section for more demo links. Later more on the "Med sys:" link I have added. I am doing the capitalisation too. Later more, first some more
882:
Ok, i did a lot of cleaning up. Changed all / to , for consistency, fixed all the question marks, various fixes. As for the new layout templates, i have a slight preference for 1B, but here also, to my opinion they're all way better than how it was, so i'm in favor of picking one on a short term to
715:
4. So I suggest you take a professional look at the current wording & layout proposals in the draft (I am not a medical). We absolutely need good quality words, first. As you noted, this RfC is a bit sleepy, but not dead. I am thinking about a concluding proposal within a few days. Tell us what
110:
Many templates have identifiers in the navbox title. I don't think that's ideal, as it's pretty hard to read. That said retaining the identifiers is useful for categorisation purposes and perhaps some future use relating to
Wikidata. So, how should these be displayed? As a separate line in the box?
4085:
Thanks for applying this. I'm not in favour of adding "medical system" to each of the navbars. I am ideologically opposed to considering things like anatomy and physiology as under the purview of medicine :P (I consider them related, but independent to medicine). Also it looks confusing, is wordy,
3021:
I agree, we recently had a similar discussion about the anatomy infobox. I suspect the colours originally come from arteries and veins (naturally red and blue), but the question then becomes what about the other 30 topics, and with each having a separate colour it ends up like a kalaeidoscope. And
1048:
I'm sorry, but Tom asked me to. And it ties into the issue of how to deal with distinguishing the general disease templates from specific tumor/infection/congenital/etc disease templates. But if you'd prefer me to report this elsewhere, please tell me where. I'd like to keep an overview and have a
608:
we're drafting improved versions. Is that correct? Are we just discussing layout or also contents? Would it be helpful/appreciated if i made some bold edits, such as write out the medicine categories and change everything to upper case first letters? And maybe add or remove a link or two if i felt
402:
Hmm. I have been thinking. Why not just move the links here into an actual navbox, and replace it with some general links? (eg "M:VASCULAR . Anatomy . Physiology . Disease" or simply just a link to the parent navbox/article). It seems these templates are all trying to be the "parent" navbox... and
383:
First step: spell out all the abbreviations. Change jargon words or use brackets for any secondary helpful word/abbr. (after that, read more here). Don't mind space for now. Make sure everything you might need is in there. (reducing is easier that adding). Then use newlines and lists and brackets
3897:
too for this. I add here: You first sentence I don't understand (or I do understand, but then you are talking different links). Simple: we should provide an overview of the 36 topics. "Bones and cartilage" is just one, but one from what? How can a reader grasp that there are more? That is what we
3532:
Sorry DePiep, the last thing I want to do is come across as rude. This is what I mean about this format not being entirely suited to long discussions. I was responding to this line "Trying to get my head around this original question..." and probably should have started by saying that I like that
1321:
After your editing, a lot of errors came to light in structuring. For example, "eye physiology" was now a subgroup of "visual pathways". But "visual pathways" should be a subgroup of eye anatomy, which should be named "Anatomy", not "Eye". I fixed the ones i saw at first glance and cleaned up the
4666:
We don't need a link to a grand overview. Firstly, most WP links work at the same level or down -- infoboxes and what not don't all point to "medicine" or "anatomy" or a parent subject. Users are not likely to be interested, even though the set of navboxes is quite impressive. I don't think that
2101:
For #2 and onwards, I suggest we just implement. We've already had one round of comments which I published on WPMED's talk page, interested users participated, there's evidence users are not happy with the existing set. So even if we implement now I think we have a fair amount of backing that it
2621:
OK we are both satisfied with the templates. There are some minor changes to be made but feel free to start deploying them, we both agree there's nothing systemic preventing deployment. We'll run over items 1.19 through 1.38 at a later date, and try and get you on a google hangout too. So to be
985:
My pleasure, once i noticed the current state of the template, it became like a thorn in my eye (Dutch expression). @DePiep, thank you too, it's looking very good so far. I think the "treatment" header makes it obsolete in most cases to list as "Procedures, Drugs (drug1, drug2)" and this can be
777:
The "Inborn error of metabolism" template was especially messy, it didn't contain a link to the template for A16 (other gi/metabolism drugs) and it had a list of info topics that didn't belong there and was a duplicate of the second column. But not an exact duplicate, so i moved it there to be
781:
I consistently use the word drugs, where the words drugs/medication/agents/etc were randomly used. Exception for the two skin related infoboxes (see next point) and the mouth medication, because that medication is mostly used topically. I'm hesitant on antibiotics, antivirals and antifungals
2453:
No go for me yet. A lot of errors were introduced recently, i'll try to fix them now. I'm really not ok with tumors (discussion above). And my question about what final technical details above hasn't been answered. I think the templates should be ready to the point where they can be directly
553:
page looks like a mess. I agree that the abbreviations and background colors should be removed, human doesn't need to be mentioned and we should use lay equivalents wherever possible. Although, i can asssure you, English laymen use professional terms way more than Dutch patients, where every
3983:
Should we insert something like: "Index of..." in the titles, or do something else to make them distinct? Otherwise I am not sure readers will understand that these navboxes are linking to templates. Readers may just think that these are just another row in the template linking to articles
3564:
of the coin here. In summary it is very reasonable to state "form should follow function". I think the function of the navs should be to provide an indexed list of relevant links for each system, so I think the form should reflect that if possible. I've created a subtopic below for this. --
773:
I think some templates should be renamed. For example "Drugs used in benign prostatic hypertrophy" should be "Drugs used in benign prostatic hyperplasia" and "Oxytocics" should be "Oxytocins". I changed how the names are displayed in the templates, but i don't know how to go about renaming
4606:
about those other 35. They are not mentioned or even hinted. An overview is not in sight in any way. (Even worse, the "bones and carlilage" topic as a whole does not even have a home article, clearly). So how can a reader find that overview? Answer: provide a link to the complete list of
3799:
In the draft, I have added some variant structures for this sub-navigation box (child navbox). I have returned to the basic navbox layout: rowheader plus several rows/sub-groups. I don't see any advantage in the current column structure. Colors there are default navbox colors (blues).
548:
Summoned by bot for an RfC. A slightly odd way to draw attention to this, but ok. I have expertise on medicine, but i don't know much about nav boxes. To be honest, i couldn't find a way to display the actual navboxes, as they are displayed on WP pages, on a single overview page. The
828:, to keep the overview (such a discussion would really make things foggy here). Please propose those changes in a new thread. When such a move is done correctly, all these template links will be changed/redirect all right in the pages templates (we don't have to worry about that).
1858:
I can't say, but I use daily your very useful recent chances lists in
Anatomy, and I'm sure other users use the Medical ones. A super list, as you propose here, may be useful for vandalism-fighters and other types. Although I would probably still stick to a more focused list.
4627:
is in template space, not content space; that is: in our engine room. We do not want readers to be lead outside of content (say, article+category) space. The inner workings of this wiki are not part of the encyclopedia. On top of this, it is a navigation box template (see
4632:). That too is not content (it is a tool for the reader, only within the wiki). Also, we can not change that template to make a better presentation in this navs page. Put this way: if those 36 systems are worth mentioning, they must have an article (That article can be a
4101:
quick reply: I'll loyally remove that when we here conclude otherwise, of course (anything before it is live). My background thinking is that a title should be fine reading (grammar), whatever it says. the other options mentioned do not make good reading (try: out loud).
3184:
this topic for now. It makes this RfC too complicated. I don't propose to change them (just noting: it is bad because it leads the Reader outside of
Content space = article space, into our engine room. In other words: if it's that important, it should have an
2533:
As for process, we could do this: 1. put live what we have today/tomorrow, and 2. Continue editing this central way into a version 3.0 re-starting next week. It takes out time pressure to compromise on quality. If you both feel better that way, it's worth it.
3505:
You did not response to a single word I wrote. You are going off-topic from letter 1 (read the first sentence, the topic one you wrote). You are restarting about "link to templates" after I said: doesn't matter. And, new but not helpful: you are reasoning
1597:
Agree. Now that we've made these templates readable, they stretch on and on. A single page might have a few medical templates. Would it be better to include them as collapsed so that they don't get too cluttered? (We may be breaking another rule here!).
603:
On the risk of sounding stupid, but if i understand correctly, there is a subtemplate for the bottom bit of infoboxes on topics related to human anatomy and medicine. In their current state these are near unusable, because it's all abbreviations. On
3902:
that is not needed. A list article can nicely keep that sublists, presented with enough space too (it won't be just the templates). Notes: in the link I wrote about article/template diff. And in Demo-1C I propose an other format for this link.
3083:
Question. Do we need every box to state all the anatomical subsections? ("Anatomy (x, y, z)")? In most templates, the word "Anatomy" links to a separate template... so could we move the subsections there? It would save a lot of space, for one
712:(there is another tread & outcome for that already, see above). Also, major changes in the 36 system setup we have, we should do in a later, separate discussion (would complicate matters, while we are waiting for the simplification).
1873:
I'll add that cat for myself at least. I am missing it today in this RfC for overview, checks. (How many templates use them? How many articles?). Can search that manually, but not feasible for 36 templates. Also, it is useful with the
384:
and other text layouts to support any structure that is in there. Forget about colors, use one or two max (navbox blocks). If this is still unclear to the Reader, use more text (headsers, rowheaders). (I agree it is intimidating). -
447:
now has the source code from all 34 templates. For us to play. I see that all these links are to templates. That is bad style in article space (from articles, a reader should not be lead to template space for content). The current
518:
Collapsed, not because unimportant but because most of this is implemented or discussed in detail sections. (Fun quote: "Let's remove ♂ and ♀ from male/female reproductive system. We also don't put a <3 in front of the cardiac
4783:
Good point indeed. (If only TomLT gave in, accepting my proposal ;-) ). Expect this issue to return in future navs discussions, because it touches good nav design (it's worth dying for—but not today). -16:32, 26 December 2014
3098:
Space does not matter now. Best is Navbox rule #1: does it have to be one click away from the article page it is on? Then there is problem 2: we should not link to a template itself, but to an article (Example as it is now:
4754:
I hope this doesn't offend anyone, but would it be an idea to focus on this after the improved navboxes have gone live? We can add this later and i think fixing the ghastly current state of the navboxes should be priority.
4377:
A short note to state, we will need to update the documentation to state clearly and loudly that we are linking templates, not articles. Otherwise, with the ability to edit these templates, there may be a constant battle.
3165:
Is there a necessity that the links don't link to other navboxes? I think it is very useful that these meta navboxes link to other navboxes, hence their meta nature. If they were easier to use, it'd be very handy.
1730:
tho have three subheaders; the information is presented correct. It is also OK to have the blocks shown in a different structure as the upper part of the navbox has, because it is another approach of the navigated
2566:
1. wikikmail issue, will try (now ortomorrow). Note: given timelimit by PM (6 days off), we could publish as-they-0are (wrats & all) for now; and restart this process in a week (three of us picking up again).
3606:
Given how it starts to look (in new layout), I am pleased with their presence. Looks like we can show them correct & helpful not confusingly. I met one new argument to keep: if we would remove them, template
423:
the Grand box that has them all? Anyway, yes bring them central (in a single /sandbox) for this development. Once the total is OK, we can start thinking about cutting them out in subtemplates/childtemplates etc.
3841:
a blue-colored bottom block would look OK. (The issue of being distinct will be back on our agenda when we want to change these strange 16 colors in those navs completely). So I propose to stick with the blues.
2439:, current status is: we have two Go's for current version. If you confirm OK too for this same version, we have consensus to publish it (edits will break this status, so only edit for crucial changes please). -
4416:
Yeah, if someone missed that point, we'll kindly explain and we've had a thorough discussion here. Anyone who wants to enter the battle will find a battlefield where the battle is mostly over already ;-) -
2500:
what's the latest or earliest time (in the day) that you'll be online? I suspect we have a large time difference, I will try and login early (or late) so we can have some easier simultaneous discussions.
1336:
Yes, that is the intended way to improve the blocks (I did an automated mass-edit, hence the weird bracket orders but you got it). Do keep checking & editing. We can't skip or overspeed steps though.
583:(bottom block). When we agree on this central page, we can spread the new blocks over the navboxes. Yes they are hard to find, it needs some clicking around. I hope that fdraft page gives a good homebase.
2961:
Appear to be trying to arrange by topic. I'm all for getting rid of them: there's too many and it's difficult to maintain, difficult to standardise, and doesn't really convey much information. --
2715:
Yep, I agree with notification but I did post @ WPMED and this issue has been raised by multiple other people, so I think we should go ahead with this and then people can comment as we deploy. --
956:
Enough for today. no 1-8 of 36 into some new layout (still not definitive). Within a list changes are welcome (the *- and **-lists). Pls leave the navbox structure intact, to have them similar. -
3003:. There too they are useless. For this topic (the 36 overview child-navboxes) we can ignore that. These templates themselves can have regular (blue) navbox colors. I'll propose in the draft. -
1666:
1530:
1662:: none of these template has more then one of these blocks. There is no issue (re this; the navboxes are a horror for other reasons). The issue of stacked templates is still best shown in
4402:
changes. If we support our edits like we do now, that 'battle' is easy to deflect. And always, always there is: everything is better that those OR abbr's. Let that so-called battle come. -
2139:
I am working on this all, but need time for quality. Could be I ask for a 20h pause (for that, could we date for tomorrow 22hUTC or earlier?; I want you to be online when we move it). -
2408:
Whoops, per the 'level 4' comments above I've made one edit. Won't be making any more until deployment, & feel free to revert that edit if you don't think it's an improvement. --
211:: "I imagine that you are going to get a lot of people who want to lengthen the abbrevations. I doubt that everyone will be comfortable seeing abbreviations employed so aggressively"
3555:"? I am not so sure about this, because I think it is very dependent on what layout we are choosing as to how much space we have to contain the data. I think it definitely would be
770:
I left out the "drugs" introduction and rewrote the names of some groups of drugs so they themselves show it's about drugs. I did this in some templates where i felt it was better.
3736:
Just playing, but I'd like to have that List-link someway somewhere. Demo-1 if fine too. Needed to change caption "anatomy", which was used wring that way given toe list items.
3592:
Now that we've got a nice layout, I'm happy to leave the anatomical substructure links be, and drop this discussion about including or not including anatomical substructures. --
2380:
If you two both give an OK for a single same version that's a go; that version is frozen then. (I myself will only interfere when layout & struct issues are unconvincing). -
1740:. Including the header, the minimum is four rows per block, whereas the old format had one row (so far not counting line wraps for longer texts). However, since we decided that
4557:; a navbox is not exactly content). Also, each of the 36 navbox blocks (those we are discussing here) can have a linked text in the lefthand rowheader (text suggestion only): "
4463:
Yeah, there may be an explanation of why all these abbreviations were used, but that wasn't a good justification, so as far as i'm concerned we can start removing that already.
3122:/ t / c / b / l / s / a) " we should just have "anat" and either redirect to a central index point like here, or to a central anatomy template for PNS which holds that data. --
1753:
My opinion is that we can keep the separate headers as presented. As a structure it is OK, and perceived usage is largely required by an other cause (writing abbr in full). -
1612:
I recognise that optimism, but don't expect good edits after deployment. For example, I might log off for a while. It is today only that we can play this freely with all 36.
1518:
2583:
OK. Pizzaman and I will review as far as we can today, when he goes offline then we can start deploying... in the meantime we will still be going for another hour or two. --
1626:
Whatever the cost & delay: we will not change those hundred parent templates. We are here to write in long the abbreviations - and we'll do. "too long" is relative. -
354:
Any ideas are welcome, clearly a lot of work has gone in to the current system and it is very comprehensive, but at the same time it could also be improved. Any ideas? --
3440:
3283:
2552:
Send me an email, DePiep. We're working through the templates at the moment. I agree we should deploy once there are no systemic issues, and iron out the flaws later. --
236:
2597:
I'm off. Drop a note here on what we should do. I'll read all today's new posts here, see if not too much damage exists. I expect we need to restart this next year. -
821:
Wordings: I cannot say anything on correctness of wordings. I would take them as an improvement (to stay) blindly. 'worst case': wiki can always receive improvements.
708:
3. I think we should limit out first step target to these topics. We should not include: remove colors from all those templates, of change anythin Gray/TA numbers in
785:
I think "Integumentary system, superficial fascia, and loose connective tissue" and "Skin appendage" should be merged by combining all links and deleting duplicates.
4087:
Smell") and now we're going back a step. I think the "Index" makes it clear what this is and we don't necessarily need a "medical system" appended to each item.--
3837:
But look at this: as long as the rest of the navbox has these weird 16 background colors, this default navbox blue nicely stands out as distinct :-). Example: in
3999:
Yes let's do that. (for the record, to keep my standing as navbox editor high ;-): I must say again that linking to templates from content space is not good!). -
1415:
Question: as you say, using 'below' is problematic. Yet we've created some pretty nice-looking alternatives. How would they be included in other navboxes? --
2316:
Yes if you need more time we postpone. Quality checks we need, we will not hurry. And no better not split the live copying bc of consistency checks needed. -
1351:
I have gone through all of the boxes and, except for IEM, are happy with their layout and think any minor issues can be addressed after they are deployed. --
2181:
Also, perhaps it would be nice if each of us pushed 1/3 of the templates live as we all worked hard on it and in celebration of the great collaboration :-).
730:
Thanks for your attention, PizzaMan. I agree with DePiep that we should try and keep the scope of this RfC narrow and if possible work step by step (#3). --
2729:
Development here is serious and an improvement. People can ask questions, but there are no reasons that would forbid the moves, as if we are trespassing. -
2468:
It's open then. Improve as you think needed, note whne you are satisfied. As for tech details, they are not content/layout and are not done in the draft. -
2394:
Done. I don't feel we have any issues that will "block" deployment. I will stop editing the navs now and make any additional changes after deployment. --
279:
4086:
and leads to some strange results ("Index of the viral disease medical system"). Lastly we just went through a simplification ("Olfactory system --: -->
682:. There are 36 of these building blocks (for 36 medical systems) as listed in this draft page, and they are in scores of medical template navboxes (see
4674:
to have an article to catalogue all these templates for posterity, but I disagree we need to link to this list in every one of these embedded navboxes.
4027:...or should it read: "Index of bones and cartilage topics"? "Index of bones and cartilage medical topics"? (my choice now would be the first one). -
1881:
We should expect a lot of activity after the change (especially with the v-t-e links available). Not vandals primarily (this change invites GF edits).
1683:
You make a good point, not many templates include 3+ embedded navboxes, so the point about length is somewhat mute (I reply in more length below). --
1210:
166:). Consensus for the major changes. Non-blocking details are left for future discussion and edits. Any related topic can be started or reopened at
3341:
anatomy. Because, it is a level or two away (not horizontal, not a sibling but uncle topic). For this reason, these sub-divisions better be gone.
261:
3444:
3287:
589:
Secondary improvements discussed here are different layouts (demos are in the draft page). There is no need to close this RfC, there is time. -
2826:
1843:
Would it be useful to have a maintenance category that lists all pages (template and articles) that uses any of these 36 block subtemplates? -
788:
In some cases, i named a category "parkinson drugs" for example, rather than "anti-parkinson drugs" because i think the anti- part is obvious.
3412:
3255:
79:
71:
66:
927:. I have just converted the top three now. Look at the 3 subheaders we have: "Description, Diseases, Treatment". We need the word 'drugs'. -
4478:
4367:
2821:
The abbreviations are unintelligible, serve no encyclopedic purpose, are easily replaced with actual
English words, and therefore should go
1960:
1899:
3834:
is problematic, because that is just a full row basically (not the subgrouping & lines without a more difficult template construct.)
2780:
I think it is so hard to understand all this stuff... I don't know, I think its weird an can be a problem to get for a lot of people. --
4680:
I agree with you here, too. If we are going to include the link, then presenting it in an elegant way will make all the difference. --
3838:
3436:
3279:
3140:
580:
452:
as it is now, is only needed in documentation of these templates (for editors help & overview). So this is my proposal: create an
1884:
About those RC links I added to this RfC, below: I may make another update, but dunno about long term. For now, it they serve well. -
1261:
About removing/relinking "Medicine systems:" in the header: see # above. Currently showing: demo-1B, proposed improvement: Demo-1C. -
3432:
3420:
3275:
3263:
2622:
clear, we're both clear for deployment to start (even for the templates 1.19 through 1.38 that haven't been thoroughly reviewed). --
1726:
require edits in the parent template. (note: we don't know which or how many there are having multipole blocks). However, it is not
2643:. As Tom(LT) notes, possible improvements can follow and do not prevent this deployment. Discussions can be started or reopened in
1718:. This is about an important change (proposed) that affects what the reader sees. There are three changes in play. First, we have
3224:
3102:
3000:
1199:
636:
3151:
anatomy topics linked (uncle topics: the one level up grouping). I need to think about this, these templates have many levels. -
4816:
And for when we do get into discussing this, we shouldn't forget the existense of the template (above) that is already in use.
4301:
3330:
655:
441:
4830:
Edit: have moved the template above so that the page isn't indented along with the template. Thanks for pointing this out.--
4013:
Just did this by mass-edit. Does it read nice now, or am I missing a word, at the end? Should use a lowercase for "bones". -
245:: "It's completely insane to use unintelligible abbreviations when there are plenty of electrons for actual English words. "
4258:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2904:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1154:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
191:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
105:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
4941:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
4218:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2771:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1115:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
868:
Thanks, i'm removing "drugs" from most treatment sections then. Also, i'm moving lab tests to diseases where appliccable.
460:(or something else). It has all these 34 navbox contents (in 34 sections). Then, all those individual navboxes can link (
147:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
3578:
OK, glad you picked up I was disappointed ;-) , but not that disappointed to chase you away completely ;-). Later more. -
1159:(Have created a new section relating to testing this on different templates... hopefully we can get this working soon) --
4643:
3857:
3705:
2913:
1457:
shows good but requires editing all those templates. Better not!) I think my remark about "below" should be revisited. -
1190:
836:
698:
628:
605:
576:
465:
457:
163:
3687:
Thanks for creating those layouts, DePiep. My preferred alternate layout is Draft 1. Do you have a preferred layout? --
4307:
4280:
3875:
all the links can be held in the template. If we are to include a link, I feel it should point to an article, such as
3398:
3243:
883:
be pushed live and then discussing if there is no consensus. Can you easily put the content in the improved template?
683:
47:
17:
4289:
4715:
will be used in the green documentation only (below each of the 36 block templates). That's for us template editors.
4864:
4798:
4585:
4581:
4439:
4295:
3416:
3259:
38:
3638:
I also agree, it's a good service to WP users and there's enough structure that it's not disruptive. Collapsing.
3144:
3917:
OK I have replied in the thread above, so that we don't have two parallel conversations about the same topic. --
3325:
from that article). 2. And also, the sub-nav box is present on these more detailed (individual) bone pages like
755:
I'd like to name the template "Template:Agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system" as "Agents acting on the
3611:
1475:
1448:
so that's good news: we don't need editing there!!, we can just put the new form into the block's subtemplate.
1433:
4636:
article). The draft article must be edited a lot, but that can follow the box building we are doing right now.
693:
abbreviations. These are not common medical abbreviations even, so the Reader is not helped at all (more like
3424:
3267:
2123:
2066:
4106:- yes because you suggested adding "Index of ..."; adding that only makes bad reading. Later more, maybe. -
4041:
I think it must be "Index of bones and cartilage medical topics". Because, a block might end up in article
1279:
I have made all 36 showing the Demo-1C (header row with v-t-e box). No link to article "List of" for now. -
4849:
4740:
we use it it better be in a (sub-)title-bar style (as Demo-C has). Earlier Demo-B style is bad for this. -
4709:
4698:
4617:
4551:
4271:
2785:
550:
420:
270:
4915:
to do, but can only do after going live. Not for delayed topics (those simply should start anew later). -
4562:
3621:
itself! Good navigation design then might say: then that template does not belong on that article page. -
1322:)()'s. I probably won't be ably to contribute much the following days, so a merry christmas to you both!
3408:
3251:
3220:. Of course, from now on they are spelled out. So in, for example, for Joints we'd have this sub-navbox
843:
Capital letters should be by standard navbox style: capitalize, except when in brackets (is ** in list).
666:
4292:
1496:
1466:
1424:
232:
797:
also sometimes it says "drugs (drug1, drug1)" and sometimes "drugs: drug1, drug2". Which do we prefer?
2056:
679:
586:
Proposal is, first of all, to get rid of the abbreviations: spell them out. That alone is a solution.
250:
1441:| belowstyle = background: transparent; padding: 0px; | below = {{Bone and cartilage navs/sandbox}}
1092::OK well I'm calling it a day today, and taking tomorrow off, Merry Christmas for tomorrow folks. --
3326:
288:
4629:
971:
it. Ah, I see, DePiep, the VTE links like that are useful. I feel we are making solid progress. --
315:
Single-letter abbreviations can barely be clicked with a mouse, let alone used on a mobile setting
201:
A number of users have expressed that the current naming system is incomprehensible and unusable:
4900:
4835:
4821:
4774:
4760:
4694:
First this, technical: if it becomes an article, the content will not be the set of navboxes (as
4685:
4468:
4422:
4383:
4242:
4195:
4147:
4092:
4064:
3989:
3922:
3884:
3876:
3821:
3727:
3692:
3643:
3597:
3569:
3538:
3475:
3171:
3127:
3089:
3027:
2966:
2888:
2748:
2720:
2705:
2627:
2588:
2557:
2506:
2487:
2459:
2413:
2399:
2371:
2335:
2307:
2244:
2216:
2186:
2172:
2158:
2107:
1921:
1864:
1805:
1777:
1688:
1649:
1603:
1574:
1420:
1370:
1356:
1327:
1312:
1298:
1164:
1097:
1054:
976:
918:
906:
888:
873:
809:
735:
614:
563:
408:
359:
132:
116:
3470:
don't have to remove the possibly useful links to anatomy article groupings and what not, too.--
2947:
What do the 16 colors (in the lefthand column) mean, and is this grouping stable or arbitrary? -
1185:
About how the block appears in parent templates, incl. block 'header' like "Bones and cartilage"
4924:
4904:
4876:
4839:
4825:
4778:
4764:
4749:
4689:
4655:
4574:
4516:
4490:
4472:
4452:
4426:
4411:
4387:
4348:
4246:
4199:
4175:
4151:
4137:
4115:
4096:
4080:
4058:
4036:
4022:
4008:
3993:
3940:
3926:
3912:
3888:
3869:
3851:
3825:
3809:
3761:
3745:
3731:
3717:
3696:
3647:
3630:
3601:
3587:
3573:
3542:
3527:
3500:
3479:
3350:
3309:
3197:
3175:
3160:
3131:
3116:
3093:
3046:
3031:
3012:
2984:
2970:
2956:
2892:
2863:
2838:
2814:
2789:
2752:
2738:
2724:
2709:
2676:
2656:
2631:
2606:
2592:
2576:
2561:
2543:
2510:
2491:
2477:
2463:
2448:
2431:
2417:
2403:
2389:
2375:
2339:
2325:
2311:
2262:
2248:
2234:
2220:
2206:
2190:
2176:
2162:
2148:
2111:
2096:
2038:
1972:
1939:
1925:
1911:
1893:
1868:
1852:
1809:
1795:
1781:
1762:
1692:
1653:
1635:
1621:
1607:
1592:
1578:
1561:
1374:
1360:
1346:
1331:
1316:
1302:
1288:
1270:
1239:
1168:
1142:
1101:
1088:
1058:
1043:
1013:
980:
965:
951:
936:
910:
892:
877:
855:
813:
739:
725:
618:
598:
567:
530:
494:
480:
433:
412:
393:
363:
179:
136:
127:
There's a separate discussion above about the specific use of the Gray's
Anatomy identifier. --
120:
2781:
609:
the urge. I'm sorry if i'm asking the obvious, but i'm trying to understand the context here.
4633:
4920:
4872:
4745:
4651:
4570:
4512:
4486:
4448:
4407:
4344:
4171:
4133:
4111:
4076:
4054:
4032:
4018:
4004:
3936:
3908:
3865:
3847:
3805:
3757:
3741:
3713:
3626:
3583:
3523:
3496:
3404:
3346:
3305:
3247:
3193:
3156:
3112:
3042:
3008:
2980:
2952:
2859:
2810:
2734:
2672:
2652:
2602:
2572:
2539:
2473:
2444:
2427:
2385:
2321:
2258:
2230:
2202:
2144:
2092:
2034:
1968:
1935:
1907:
1889:
1848:
1791:
1758:
1677:
1631:
1617:
1588:
1557:
1492:
1462:
1342:
1284:
1266:
1235:
1221:
1138:
1084:
1039:
1009:
961:
947:
932:
851:
721:
594:
526:
490:
485:
Below I have created subthreads per topic. SHould be fine as long as they are independent. -
476:
429:
389:
320:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Template:Human_systems_and_organs&oldid=632998856
175:
1875:
791:
I removed the links to ATC codes, i don't see the need to promote that system in infoboxes.
403:
that would probably be better off as a full navbox, rather than in its abbreviated form. --
4190:
Reviewed and happy with all of them. Changed to plural or added 'the where appropriate. --
3428:
3317:
3271:
2834:
224:
4642:- I'm not happy with its layout yet. Last new suggestion: we can put it in a header. See
694:
672:, bottom block/row. Next, those navigation templates are actually used in articles, like
579:. It has all 36 medical 'subsystems'. Each of these subsystems is used in navboxes as in
4558:
2482:
A lot of corrections i made were reverted to reintroduce errors. Please discuss above.
834:
About removal of title-like use of "drug": does not matter in this old way. In the new
1429:
Let me see. I've put the first one (Bones & cart's) in its sandbox and further in
1049:
discussion in one place before the official requests are made on specific talk pages.
4896:
4831:
4817:
4770:
4756:
4681:
4464:
4418:
4379:
4238:
4191:
4143:
4088:
3985:
3918:
3880:
3817:
3723:
3688:
3639:
3593:
3565:
3534:
3471:
3167:
3123:
3085:
3023:
2962:
2884:
2744:
2716:
2701:
2623:
2584:
2553:
2502:
2497:
2483:
2455:
2454:
copy-pasted in the live template. All the checks should be done on the draft page. -
2436:
2409:
2395:
2367:
2363:
2331:
2303:
2240:
2212:
2182:
2168:
2154:
2103:
1917:
1860:
1801:
1773:
1684:
1645:
1599:
1570:
1416:
1366:
1352:
1323:
1308:
1294:
1160:
1093:
1050:
972:
902:
884:
869:
805:
794:
I didn't change much about capital letters, but there is currently much inconsistency
731:
674:
610:
559:
555:
404:
355:
216:
208:
128:
112:
2102:
won't even be "bold" to implement. We can then iron out the creases in live mode. --
253:: "...that the current version is pretty unintelligible and could do with a rethink"
1800:
Looks good to me, i don't see an issue with three blocks stacked below each other.
767:. Is there a way to do that? I left it in the broken state now to show what i mean.
3136:
No link shall lead to a template (this must change, but there is no hurry for us).
705:
with this overview, to give the Reader the overview (the overview you missed too).
237:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine/Archive_34#Edit_requests_on_medical_templates
4916:
4868:
4741:
4647:
4566:
4508:
4482:
4444:
4403:
4340:
4167:
4129:
4107:
4072:
4068:
4050:
4028:
4014:
4000:
3932:
3904:
3861:
3843:
3801:
3753:
3737:
3709:
3622:
3579:
3519:
3492:
3342:
3301:
3189:
3152:
3108:
3038:
3004:
2976:
2948:
2855:
2806:
2730:
2668:
2648:
2598:
2568:
2535:
2469:
2440:
2423:
2381:
2359:
2317:
2254:
2226:
2211:
Which technical checks? Don't we do all the technical checks on the draft page?
2198:
2167:
I'm doing a read-through of all the template to fix any minor issues that i see.
2140:
2088:
2030:
1964:
1931:
1903:
1885:
1844:
1787:
1754:
1673:
1627:
1613:
1584:
1553:
1552:
It has three blocks stacked. This looks bad when they have header-bars. Ideas? -
1488:
1458:
1338:
1280:
1262:
1231:
1134:
1080:
1035:
1005:
957:
943:
928:
898:
847:
717:
686:). They may end up in thousand+ articles ("content space", where our Reader is).
590:
558:
in a reply. Also, let's close the RfC here before we get accused of abusing it.
522:
486:
472:
425:
385:
171:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1079:
Some replies I wrote in the issue sections here. (eg re drug )(drug1, drug2). -
219:: " I agree with most of your concerns. Template:Infection navs is unwieldy..."
3816:
size (not idea, will impact on readability), or maybe a title of some sort. --
2830:
1365:
I think we made the best we could of the inborn errors of metabolism template.
242:
4729:
Well, we agree that the article should exist, so if we link we know where to.
3337:
likely that an editor wants to click right away from that detail page to the
4861:
4599:
2827:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject
Medicine#Edit requests on medical templates
303:
Abbreviations are non-standard (eg "hiva" for "HIV/AIDS", "zost" for zoster)
3300:
The proposal is to remove those eight ()-bracketed subsections of
Anatomy.
2225:
Code in templates must be correct & consistent. Draft is for content. -
306:
Abbreviations are not widely known (eg systems of numbers for drug classes)
2743:
Yep, and once deployed I will leave a note @ WPMED, WPANAT and WPPHARM. --
1672:(three blocks in one parent). Do you want anything else than a go-ahead? -
840:
we do use that title, I guess it clarifies (please take a look, Pizzaman).
4844:
re PizzaMan: we already have a template doing this, and doing it better:
4532:
Article can be created. Will not have links from the 36 Medicine navs now
751:
Ok, i made a first edit. To start off, i just looked at the drugs bits.
95:
To prevent multiple threads on the same topic, am closing this. See above
4327:
Put somewhere (/doc?) the two RC links, now below in RfC - Useful links.
3894:
1916:
That's empty. It would be a list of thousands of articles when accurate.
1786:
Yes. (thanks for reading the long stuff carefully; great conclusions). -
4042:
3618:
2197:
Prefer to do that by myself, to keep final technical checks the same. -
2129:
should be right above the "RfC - post-deployment" main section I think.
312:
Dominance given to classification systems obscures the navboxes' titles
4660:
Ah, I think I finally understand your proposal here. My responses are:
4142:
I think "Index of..." without "Medical system" is clearest (to me). --
3379:
2116:
OK, no #2. time window (do fasten seatbelt for comments & edits).
2975:
Colors can go then. I still think a sensible grouping is possible. -
2253:
For example, you wouldn't want 36 pages of documentation in there. -
1583:
They are there now. Please take a good look, this has big effects. -
346:
This isn't relating to a dispute, but I am requesting comments on:
3392:
3238:
318:
Use of colours leads to messy templates when applied: (See here: [
152:
Roundtable discussion on legibiltity and usability of medical navs
4895:
Moved to 'post-deployment' as we've agreed to discuss it then. --
2005:
Would this be part of the issue? I changed skull anatomy to ... (
689:
2. Now what are the issues here? First, we should get rid of the
4857:
4595:
3514:. About that: bad reasoning. The content text is decided by the
1659:
1641:
760:
756:
623:
1. Nothing stupid, all correct indeed. Let me give an extensive
257:
Some examples of how these and other navs are difficult to use:
4602:") is in a list of 36. But when a reader sees that block, they
1545:
OK. Even three-stacked subtemplate blocks are not a disruption.
4166:
Please check all 36 headers for awkward language exceptions. -
1569:
The sandbox version has a non-working red link at the bottom.
25:
4911:
Misunderstanding: "post-deployment" is for related things we
2330:
I'll try to be ready before the proposed 22:00 UTC tomorrow.
3547:
In response to "And, new but not helpful: you are reasoning
2239:
Why not make it correct and consistent on the draf page? -
764:
349:
How could the current set of medical templates be improved?
1179:
Zooming out: the blocks in parent templates & articles
471:(I'm popping ideas by the hour. See where it ends ;-) ). -
4067:
medical system" is not good enoug. Better: "Index of the
2136:
the draft version (36x) too when they are to be deployed.
3218:
let's remove subsections x,y,z, from 'Anatomy (x, y, z)'
2302:
europe time zone (and i'll be on a holiday from 31-12).
4304:
4298:
4286:
4283:
4277:
3559:
to have a full index on every article, but only useful
3231:
2640:
2014:
Check all subthread discussions for being closed gently
648:
643:, which is never used stand-alone. It sits in multiple
319:
4547:, currently not available (exccept for this unused(!)
2647:. All earlier RfC threads will be archived (frozen). -
2023:
2. Formal proposal to "Make draft version into live"
466:
Draft:Medicine overview of systems#Bones and cartilage
831:
Remove ATC codes and write them in words: Great! Yes!
3976:
Prefix "Index of ..." added to headers, nothing else
3216:
Trying to get my head around this original question
1736:
Another change is that each block data simply takes
923:: no, don't remove "drugs". See how it looks in the
4503:
4233:
3188:
But links still may be removed for other reasons. -
2879:
2663:
2644:
1961:
Category:Pages that use a
Medicine navs subtemplate
1900:
Category:Pages that use a
Medicine navs subtemplate
1748:
caused by the new structure, but by abbr expansion.
1129:
801:
rapidly pushing out at least semi-usable templates.
339:
167:
4678:Why does the link to medical system look this way?
4640:Why does the link to Medical system look this way?
2081:7. Follow & check effects, recent changes, ...
2052:4. Closing & freezing. Fix the whole RfC into
1667:Eponymous medical signs for nervous system/sandbox
1531:Eponymous medical signs for nervous system/sandbox
1191:Draft:Medicine overview of systems#Layout variants
782:especially as those are also often used topically.
309:Titles are difficult to understand for lay readers
3316:. 1. The sub-nav box (row) is used on pages like
2999:These colors are used almost everywhere, like in
1930:It will be filled when the new content is live. -
701:). Also I have proposed (an hour ago) to make an
1253:About deployment effects, now in core draft code
4584::" to the first demos; that target page now is
3022:also difficult to edit and maintain to boot. --
1471:No edits in the calling parent templates (like
1454:| group7 = {{Bone and cartilage navs/sandbox}}
162:Extensive discussion and draft edits done (see
3635:(Maybe fold/label this subthread as decided?)
3037:complicated; solve the abbreviations first. -
846:I'll write a proposal to move this forward. -
248:
240:
222:
214:
206:
8:
4128:Exactly what text (pattern) do you prefer? -
3967:Making clear these navbars link to templates
3147:having this tempalte, should not have these
575:OK. We are working & developing in page
4049:the navbox is not in that article today). -
4527:
3971:
3895:#Needed:_article_"List_of_medical_systems"
3787:
3675:
3370:
3071:Anatomical subdivisions should be retained
3066:
2930:
2687:
2027:Does this need a time window for comments?
1831:
1540:
1519:Eponymous medical signs for nervous system
1402:
1248:
1002:List off-topic. Moved to new section below
541:User:PizzaMan first batch of contributions
536:
368:
4523:Needed: article "List of medical systems"
2078:6. DePiep turns drafts into live code T=0
2075:5. Open new thread for new comments T=0
1407:keep "|below=" usage in parent template
3831:
1484:| below = {{Bone and cartilage navs}}
631:. As a building block, it is template
373:Preliminary ideas for discussion setup
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
4045:, which is not medical (strange that
3487:You are reintroducing a topic I have
2638:I conclude consensus for this version
1032:do not discuss template moves in here
7:
4254:The following discussion is closed.
3752:Collapsing, a bit outdated by now. -
2900:The following discussion is closed.
1150:The following discussion is closed.
187:The following discussion is closed.
111:Move to metadata and not display? --
101:The following discussion is closed.
3860:(=demo-1 with article link added) -
3792:OK, and we've moved further already
3708:(=demo-1 with article link added) -
2935:Removed from these 36 blocks (only)
1742:abbreviations should be spelled out
824:Renaming categories and templates:
296:There are a number of reasons why:
4540:"medical systems", please say so.
4477:Central /doc page for all 36+1 is
4437:Adjust central documentation page
3839:Template:Cardiovascular physiology
3830:Yes, distinction is needed. Using
3491:. Do you have a question for me? -
3141:Template:Arteries of head and neck
2914:Draft:Medicine overview of systems
2805:. Abbreviations written in full. -
606:Draft:Medicine_overview_of_systems
581:Template:Cardiovascular physiology
577:Draft:Medicine overview of systems
458:Draft:Medicine overview of systems
300:Abbreviations are incomprehensible
164:Draft:Medicine overview of systems
88:Displaying identifiers in navboxes
24:
2422:Waiting for PizzaMan to say OK. -
2084:8. Do post-change edits as needed
1963:. Shows templates and articles. -
1511:We need to take a look at this:
280:Gram-positive firmicutes diseases
4937:The discussion above is closed.
4330:
4315:
4214:The discussion above is closed.
4181:
4157:
3103:Template:Joints of head and neck
3001:Template:Arteries of lower limbs
2854:Abbreviations written in full. -
2845:
2796:
2767:The discussion above is closed.
1111:The discussion above is closed.
1030:Again, to keep this topic sane:
143:The discussion above is closed.
29:
4594:First, the block header (like "
4504:#RfC - Post-closure discussions
4502:RfC is closed. Follow up is at
4234:#RfC - Post-closure discussions
4232:RfC is closed. Follow up is at
3617:would not be showing the topic
2880:#RfC - Post-closure discussions
2878:RfC is closed. Follow up is at
2664:#RfC - Post-closure discussions
2662:RfC is closed. Follow up is at
2645:#RfC - Post-closure discussions
1211:Bone and cartilage navs/sandbox
1130:#RfC - Post-closure discussions
1128:RfC is closed. Follow up is at
340:#RfC - Post-closure discussions
168:#RfC - Post-closure discussions
4623:can give that overview? Well,
3331:Basilar part of occipital bone
3139:It's complicated. For example
647:(='navboxes' or 'navs', list:
262:Peripheral nervous system navs
1:
4925:22:41, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
4905:21:37, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
4877:10:20, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
4840:07:46, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
4826:01:10, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
4779:22:17, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
4765:13:24, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
4750:11:58, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
4690:22:27, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
4656:20:23, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
4586:Draft:List of medical systems
4575:14:15, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
4517:16:09, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
4491:09:29, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
4473:19:37, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
4453:19:32, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
4427:19:34, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
4412:22:31, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
4388:22:18, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
4349:21:50, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
4247:22:46, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
4200:22:45, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
4176:22:35, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
4152:21:12, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
4138:11:13, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
4116:22:24, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
4097:21:44, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
4081:21:18, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
4059:10:25, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
4037:09:12, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
4023:08:56, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
4009:08:49, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
3994:07:56, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
3941:00:18, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
3927:22:29, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
3913:20:38, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
3889:21:42, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
3870:18:16, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
3762:08:51, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
3746:23:23, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
3732:21:42, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
3718:23:23, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
3648:13:21, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
3631:08:06, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
3602:22:36, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
3180:"don't link to templates": I
2893:22:44, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
2864:19:14, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
2825:Please see the discussion at
2815:19:13, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
2753:22:52, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
2739:21:01, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
2725:20:46, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
2710:12:39, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
2677:16:09, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
2657:15:55, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
2632:01:34, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
2607:00:32, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
2593:23:48, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
2577:23:41, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
2562:23:35, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
2544:23:24, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
2511:21:26, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
2492:16:43, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
2478:16:23, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
2464:16:15, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
2449:08:38, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
2432:23:07, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
2418:22:49, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
2404:21:26, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
2390:20:58, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
2376:19:32, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
2340:18:26, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
2326:14:54, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
2312:14:25, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
2263:00:28, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
2249:16:55, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
2235:16:20, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
2221:18:26, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
2207:14:54, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
2191:13:37, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
2177:13:36, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
2163:03:27, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
2149:23:57, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
2112:22:52, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
2097:22:33, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
2039:22:33, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
1973:09:19, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
1940:13:32, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
1926:13:25, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
1912:23:20, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
1894:21:36, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
1869:21:24, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
1853:18:42, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
1810:13:31, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
1796:21:26, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
1782:21:20, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
1763:12:07, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
1693:21:20, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
1654:23:08, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
1636:22:57, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
1622:22:53, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
1608:21:45, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
1593:10:41, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
1579:00:41, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
1562:11:34, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
1497:09:09, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
1467:00:18, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
1425:22:29, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
1375:13:31, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
1361:22:32, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
1347:17:13, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
1332:01:36, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
1317:00:41, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
1303:22:18, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
1289:10:03, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
1271:08:28, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
1240:08:23, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
1169:08:12, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
1143:16:09, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
1102:08:51, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
1089:08:48, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
1059:01:00, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
1044:00:43, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
1014:01:07, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
981:22:40, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
966:21:12, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
952:19:24, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
937:19:18, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
911:19:12, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
893:18:57, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
878:18:04, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
856:17:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
814:16:40, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
740:21:43, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
726:16:48, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
619:15:24, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
599:14:07, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
568:13:09, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
531:16:46, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
364:23:56, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
227:: "This is incomprehensible."
180:16:09, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
4705:copy/pastes). This template
3852:12:29, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
3826:20:27, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
3810:15:00, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
3697:22:17, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
3588:21:05, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
3574:22:17, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
3543:22:17, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
3528:20:04, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
3501:12:26, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
3480:01:52, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
3351:13:55, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
3310:13:55, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
3198:12:16, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
3176:20:30, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
3161:11:52, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
3132:04:33, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
3117:15:16, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
3094:23:02, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
3047:12:08, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
3032:20:32, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
3013:11:57, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
2985:22:35, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
2971:21:01, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
2957:10:14, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
1507:Stacked blocks in a template
495:10:40, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
481:09:36, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
434:08:50, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
413:03:21, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
394:00:09, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
137:23:06, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
121:23:06, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
4543:That article will give the
4368:Bone and cartilage navs/doc
2790:16:58, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
2692:Tempalte talkpages notified
2683:Talk pages of each template
2641:01:35 UTC, 30 December 2014
1987:1. Fix issues to be solved
684:Category:Medicine templates
18:Template talk:Medicine navs
4956:
4671:Why must it be an article?
4611:Why must it be an article?
4440:Template:Medicine navs/doc
3893:See my 20:23 responses in
2132:re 3: I will also declare
1878:half-bot (do you use it?).
1193:(Demo-1, Demo-1B, Demo 1C)
468:" for in-content overview.
3722:OK that looks good too.--
3145:Superior laryngeal artery
2776:Too much difficult for me
1827:Category for maintenance?
629:Draft:#Respiratory system
332:{{rfc|sci|rfcid=931F1C2}}
4939:Please do not modify it.
4256:Please do not modify it.
4216:Please do not modify it.
3783:Navbox structure options
2902:Please do not modify it.
2769:Please do not modify it.
1152:Please do not modify it.
1113:Please do not modify it.
338:Closed. Follow up is at
189:Please do not modify it.
145:Please do not modify it.
103:Please do not modify it.
4646:I just added. Better? -
4592:Why need a link at all?
4398:? Jee, we are founding
3230:to be spread around in
3225:Bone and cartilage navs
3062:Anatomical subdivisions
2921:With consensus/outdated
2839:03:20, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
2000:Solve level level issue
1738:three rows by structure
1481:), keep existing code:
1200:Bone and cartilage navs
637:Respiratory system navs
4664:Why do we need a link?
4071:medical system". OK? -
3553:what should it contain
3512:what should it contain
3234:, with content being:
2007:see discussion section
551:Template:Medicine_navs
421:Template:Medicine navs
255:
247:
229:
221:
213:
4580:I have added a link "
4363:: single doc page is
4223:RfC - Post-deployment
1995:Create maint category
1397:
942:layout conversions. -
699:Drat:#Layout variants
656:Respiratory pathology
442:Medicine_navs/sandbox
231:From a discussion at
42:of past discussions.
1293:That looks great. --
680:Pulmonary laceration
645:navigation templates
4563:Bones and cartilage
4479:with the Bones navs
4104:Going back one step
3327:Pharyngeal tubercle
2496:OK done for today.
2153:OK I'll be here. --
2049:3. Go decision T=Go
4604:do not have a clue
4268:Check bad uses of
4257:
4065:respiratory system
3877:circulatory system
3143:. You say article
2903:
1979:Deployment process
1640:See, for example,
1153:
190:
104:
4934:
4933:
4799:System and organs
4625:{{Medicine navs}}
4255:
4211:
4210:
3960:
3959:
3779:
3778:
3667:
3666:
3466:
3465:
3461:
3058:
3057:
2926:Background colors
2901:
2764:
2763:
1955:
1954:
1836:Added in new code
1823:
1822:
1503:
1502:
1394:
1393:
1242:
1151:
1108:
1107:
922:
508:
507:
450:list of templates
188:
139:
102:
85:
84:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
4947:
4854:
4848:
4802:
4714:
4708:
4703:
4697:
4626:
4622:
4616:
4556:
4550:
4528:
4372:
4366:
4338:
4334:
4333:
4323:
4319:
4318:
4312:
4311:
4189:
4185:
4184:
4165:
4161:
4160:
3972:
3833:
3788:
3676:
3671:Preferred layout
3616:
3610:
3516:information need
3388:
3371:
3364:Hmm, what about?
3229:
3223:
3106:
3101:Joint; anatomy (
3067:
2931:
2853:
2849:
2848:
2804:
2800:
2799:
2688:
2128:
2122:
2071:
2065:
2061:
2055:
1832:
1671:
1665:
1541:
1535:
1529:
1523:
1517:
1480:
1474:
1438:
1432:
1403:
1249:
1229:
1226:
1220:
1215:
1209:
1204:
1198:
1187:. Useful links:
1120:RfC - Deployment
916:
837:layout proposals
671:
665:
660:
654:
641:
635:
537:
463:
446:
440:
369:
333:
293:
287:
284:
278:
275:
269:
266:
260:
126:
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
4955:
4954:
4950:
4949:
4948:
4946:
4945:
4944:
4943:
4942:
4935:
4852:
4846:
4796:
4712:
4706:
4701:
4695:
4624:
4620:
4614:
4554:
4548:
4533:
4525:
4370:
4364:
4357:
4331:
4329:
4316:
4314:
4275:
4269:
4260:
4251:
4250:
4249:
4225:
4220:
4219:
4212:
4182:
4180:
4158:
4156:
3977:
3969:
3961:
3793:
3785:
3780:
3681:
3673:
3668:
3614:
3612:Cranium/sandbox
3608:
3549:from the layout
3508:from the layout
3467:
3462:
3433:lower extremity
3421:upper extremity
3382:
3318:Facial skeleton
3298:
3295:Treatments: ...
3276:lower extremity
3264:upper extremity
3227:
3221:
3100:
3072:
3064:
3059:
2936:
2928:
2923:
2906:
2897:
2896:
2895:
2872:
2846:
2844:
2823:
2797:
2795:
2778:
2773:
2772:
2765:
2693:
2685:
2126:
2120:
2069:
2063:
2059:
2053:
1981:
1956:
1837:
1829:
1824:
1669:
1663:
1546:
1533:
1527:
1521:
1515:
1509:
1504:
1485:
1478:
1476:Cranium/sandbox
1472:
1455:
1451:(Also writing
1442:
1436:
1434:Cranium/sandbox
1430:
1408:
1400:
1395:
1254:
1224:
1218:
1213:
1207:
1202:
1196:
1181:
1176:
1156:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1122:
1117:
1116:
1109:
826:not in this RfC
669:
663:
658:
652:
639:
633:
542:
514:
509:
461:
444:
438:
374:
331:
329:
291:
285:
282:
276:
273:
267:
264:
258:
251:Espresso Addict
199:
193:
184:
183:
182:
159:
154:
149:
148:
107:
98:
97:
96:
90:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
4953:
4951:
4936:
4932:
4931:
4930:
4929:
4928:
4927:
4894:
4893:
4892:
4891:
4890:
4889:
4888:
4887:
4886:
4885:
4884:
4883:
4882:
4881:
4880:
4879:
4865:medical topics
4794:
4793:
4792:
4791:
4790:
4789:
4788:
4787:
4786:
4785:
4781:
4769:Good point. --
4734:Why the looks'
4730:
4727:Where to link?
4723:
4716:
4675:
4668:
4661:
4637:
4608:
4589:
4582:Medical system
4559:Medical system
4535:
4534:
4531:
4526:
4524:
4521:
4520:
4519:
4499:
4498:
4497:
4496:
4495:
4494:
4493:
4456:
4455:
4434:
4433:
4432:
4431:
4430:
4429:
4414:
4391:
4390:
4374:
4373:
4356:
4353:
4352:
4351:
4324:
4261:
4252:
4229:
4228:
4227:
4226:
4224:
4221:
4213:
4209:
4208:
4207:
4206:
4205:
4204:
4203:
4202:
4127:
4126:
4125:
4124:
4123:
4122:
4121:
4120:
4119:
4118:
4063:"Index of the
4061:
4025:
3979:
3978:
3975:
3970:
3968:
3965:
3963:
3958:
3957:
3956:
3955:
3954:
3953:
3952:
3951:
3950:
3949:
3948:
3947:
3946:
3945:
3944:
3943:
3835:
3795:
3794:
3791:
3786:
3784:
3781:
3777:
3776:
3775:
3774:
3773:
3772:
3771:
3770:
3769:
3768:
3767:
3766:
3765:
3764:
3683:
3682:
3679:
3674:
3672:
3669:
3665:
3664:
3663:
3662:
3661:
3660:
3659:
3658:
3657:
3656:
3655:
3654:
3653:
3652:
3651:
3650:
3636:
3633:
3545:
3464:
3463:
3460:
3459:
3453:
3447:
3395:
3387:
3384:
3383:
3374:
3369:
3368:
3367:
3366:
3365:
3358:
3312:
3297:
3296:
3293:
3290:
3241:
3235:
3232:these navboxes
3215:
3214:
3213:
3212:
3211:
3210:
3209:
3208:
3207:
3206:
3205:
3204:
3203:
3202:
3201:
3200:
3186:
3137:
3074:
3073:
3070:
3065:
3063:
3060:
3056:
3055:
3054:
3053:
3052:
3051:
3050:
3049:
3016:
3015:
2996:
2995:
2994:
2993:
2992:
2991:
2990:
2989:
2988:
2987:
2938:
2937:
2934:
2929:
2927:
2924:
2922:
2919:
2918:
2917:
2916:(edit central)
2907:
2898:
2876:
2875:
2874:
2873:
2871:
2868:
2867:
2866:
2822:
2819:
2818:
2817:
2777:
2774:
2766:
2762:
2761:
2760:
2759:
2758:
2757:
2756:
2755:
2695:
2694:
2691:
2686:
2684:
2681:
2680:
2679:
2659:
2620:
2619:
2618:
2617:
2616:
2615:
2614:
2613:
2612:
2611:
2610:
2609:
2547:
2546:
2530:
2529:
2528:
2527:
2526:
2525:
2524:
2523:
2522:
2521:
2520:
2519:
2518:
2517:
2516:
2515:
2514:
2513:
2357:
2356:
2355:
2354:
2353:
2352:
2351:
2350:
2349:
2348:
2347:
2346:
2345:
2344:
2343:
2342:
2288:
2285:
2284:
2283:
2282:
2281:
2280:
2279:
2278:
2277:
2276:
2275:
2274:
2273:
2272:
2271:
2270:
2269:
2268:
2267:
2266:
2265:
2179:
2137:
2130:
2124:Archive bottom
2117:
2085:
2082:
2079:
2076:
2073:
2067:Archive bottom
2050:
2047:
2046:
2045:
2021:
2020:
2019:
2018:
2017:
2016:
2015:
2011:
2010:
2002:
2001:
1998:
1980:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1948:
1947:
1946:
1945:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1882:
1879:
1839:
1838:
1835:
1830:
1828:
1825:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1766:
1765:
1750:
1749:
1733:
1732:
1720:added a header
1712:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1702:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1548:
1547:
1544:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1525:
1508:
1505:
1501:
1500:
1483:
1453:
1440:
1439:. I kept code
1428:
1427:
1410:
1409:
1406:
1401:
1399:
1396:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1305:
1274:
1273:
1256:
1255:
1252:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1227:
1216:
1205:
1194:
1180:
1177:
1175:
1174:Resolved tests
1172:
1157:
1148:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1121:
1118:
1110:
1106:
1105:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1061:
999:
998:
997:
996:
995:
994:
993:
992:
991:
990:
989:
988:
987:
939:
915:Speedy reply (
895:
880:
861:
860:
859:
858:
844:
841:
832:
829:
822:
803:
802:
798:
795:
792:
789:
786:
783:
779:
775:
771:
768:
749:
748:
747:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
728:
713:
706:
687:
627:: for section
587:
584:
544:
543:
540:
535:
534:
533:
513:
510:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
469:
417:
416:
415:
397:
396:
376:
375:
372:
367:
344:
343:
328:
325:
324:
323:
316:
313:
310:
307:
304:
301:
198:
195:
194:
185:
161:
160:
157:
156:
155:
153:
150:
142:
141:
140:
108:
99:
94:
93:
92:
91:
89:
86:
83:
82:
77:
74:
69:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4952:
4940:
4926:
4922:
4918:
4914:
4910:
4909:
4908:
4907:
4906:
4902:
4898:
4878:
4874:
4870:
4866:
4863:
4859:
4855:
4851:
4850:Medicine navs
4843:
4842:
4841:
4837:
4833:
4829:
4828:
4827:
4823:
4819:
4815:
4814:
4813:
4812:
4811:
4810:
4809:
4808:
4807:
4806:
4805:
4804:
4803:
4800:
4782:
4780:
4776:
4772:
4768:
4767:
4766:
4762:
4758:
4753:
4752:
4751:
4747:
4743:
4739:
4735:
4731:
4728:
4724:
4721:
4717:
4711:
4710:Medicine navs
4700:
4699:Medicine_navs
4693:
4692:
4691:
4687:
4683:
4679:
4676:
4672:
4669:
4665:
4662:
4659:
4658:
4657:
4653:
4649:
4645:
4641:
4638:
4635:
4631:
4619:
4618:Medicine navs
4612:
4609:
4605:
4601:
4597:
4593:
4590:
4587:
4583:
4579:
4578:
4577:
4576:
4572:
4568:
4564:
4560:
4553:
4552:Medicine navs
4546:
4541:
4537:
4536:
4530:
4529:
4522:
4518:
4514:
4510:
4506:
4505:
4500:
4492:
4488:
4484:
4480:
4476:
4475:
4474:
4470:
4466:
4462:
4461:
4460:
4459:
4458:
4457:
4454:
4450:
4446:
4442:
4441:
4436:
4435:
4428:
4424:
4420:
4415:
4413:
4409:
4405:
4401:
4397:
4396:
4395:
4394:
4393:
4392:
4389:
4385:
4381:
4376:
4375:
4369:
4362:
4359:
4358:
4355:Documentation
4354:
4350:
4346:
4342:
4337:
4328:
4325:
4322:
4313:
4309:
4306:
4303:
4300:
4297:
4294:
4291:
4288:
4285:
4282:
4279:
4273:
4272:Medicine navs
4266:
4265:
4264:
4259:
4248:
4244:
4240:
4236:
4235:
4222:
4217:
4201:
4197:
4193:
4188:
4179:
4178:
4177:
4173:
4169:
4164:
4155:
4154:
4153:
4149:
4145:
4141:
4140:
4139:
4135:
4131:
4117:
4113:
4109:
4105:
4100:
4099:
4098:
4094:
4090:
4084:
4083:
4082:
4078:
4074:
4070:
4066:
4062:
4060:
4056:
4052:
4048:
4044:
4040:
4039:
4038:
4034:
4030:
4026:
4024:
4020:
4016:
4012:
4011:
4010:
4006:
4002:
3998:
3997:
3996:
3995:
3991:
3987:
3981:
3980:
3974:
3973:
3966:
3964:
3942:
3938:
3934:
3930:
3929:
3928:
3924:
3920:
3916:
3915:
3914:
3910:
3906:
3901:
3896:
3892:
3891:
3890:
3886:
3882:
3878:
3873:
3872:
3871:
3867:
3863:
3859:
3855:
3854:
3853:
3849:
3845:
3840:
3836:
3829:
3828:
3827:
3823:
3819:
3814:
3813:
3812:
3811:
3807:
3803:
3797:
3796:
3790:
3789:
3782:
3763:
3759:
3755:
3751:
3750:
3749:
3748:
3747:
3743:
3739:
3735:
3734:
3733:
3729:
3725:
3721:
3720:
3719:
3715:
3711:
3707:
3703:
3702:
3701:
3700:
3699:
3698:
3694:
3690:
3685:
3684:
3678:
3677:
3670:
3649:
3645:
3641:
3637:
3634:
3632:
3628:
3624:
3620:
3613:
3605:
3604:
3603:
3599:
3595:
3591:
3590:
3589:
3585:
3581:
3577:
3576:
3575:
3571:
3567:
3562:
3558:
3554:
3550:
3546:
3544:
3540:
3536:
3531:
3530:
3529:
3525:
3521:
3517:
3513:
3509:
3504:
3503:
3502:
3498:
3494:
3490:
3486:
3485:
3484:
3483:
3482:
3481:
3477:
3473:
3457:
3454:
3451:
3448:
3446:
3442:
3438:
3434:
3430:
3426:
3422:
3418:
3414:
3410:
3406:
3402:
3400:
3396:
3394:
3390:
3389:
3386:
3385:
3381:
3377:
3373:
3372:
3363:
3362:
3361:
3360:
3359:
3356:
3355:
3352:
3348:
3344:
3340:
3336:
3333:. It is very
3332:
3328:
3323:
3319:
3315:
3311:
3307:
3303:
3294:
3292:Diseases: ...
3291:
3289:
3285:
3281:
3277:
3273:
3269:
3265:
3261:
3257:
3253:
3249:
3245:
3242:
3240:
3237:
3236:
3233:
3226:
3219:
3199:
3195:
3191:
3187:
3183:
3179:
3178:
3177:
3173:
3169:
3164:
3163:
3162:
3158:
3154:
3150:
3146:
3142:
3138:
3135:
3134:
3133:
3129:
3125:
3120:
3119:
3118:
3114:
3110:
3104:
3097:
3096:
3095:
3091:
3087:
3082:
3081:
3080:
3079:
3078:
3077:
3076:
3075:
3069:
3068:
3061:
3048:
3044:
3040:
3035:
3034:
3033:
3029:
3025:
3020:
3019:
3018:
3017:
3014:
3010:
3006:
3002:
2998:
2997:
2986:
2982:
2978:
2974:
2973:
2972:
2968:
2964:
2960:
2959:
2958:
2954:
2950:
2946:
2945:
2944:
2943:
2942:
2941:
2940:
2939:
2933:
2932:
2925:
2920:
2915:
2912:
2911:Useful links:
2909:
2908:
2905:
2894:
2890:
2886:
2882:
2881:
2869:
2865:
2861:
2857:
2852:
2843:
2842:
2841:
2840:
2836:
2832:
2828:
2820:
2816:
2812:
2808:
2803:
2794:
2793:
2792:
2791:
2787:
2783:
2775:
2770:
2754:
2750:
2746:
2742:
2741:
2740:
2736:
2732:
2728:
2727:
2726:
2722:
2718:
2714:
2713:
2712:
2711:
2707:
2703:
2697:
2696:
2690:
2689:
2682:
2678:
2674:
2670:
2666:
2665:
2660:
2658:
2654:
2650:
2646:
2642:
2639:
2635:
2634:
2633:
2629:
2625:
2608:
2604:
2600:
2596:
2595:
2594:
2590:
2586:
2582:
2581:
2580:
2579:
2578:
2574:
2570:
2565:
2564:
2563:
2559:
2555:
2551:
2550:
2549:
2548:
2545:
2541:
2537:
2532:
2531:
2512:
2508:
2504:
2499:
2495:
2494:
2493:
2489:
2485:
2481:
2480:
2479:
2475:
2471:
2467:
2466:
2465:
2461:
2457:
2452:
2451:
2450:
2446:
2442:
2438:
2435:
2434:
2433:
2429:
2425:
2421:
2420:
2419:
2415:
2411:
2407:
2406:
2405:
2401:
2397:
2393:
2392:
2391:
2387:
2383:
2379:
2378:
2377:
2373:
2369:
2365:
2361:
2341:
2337:
2333:
2329:
2328:
2327:
2323:
2319:
2315:
2314:
2313:
2309:
2305:
2300:
2299:
2298:
2297:
2296:
2295:
2294:
2293:
2292:
2291:
2289:
2286:
2264:
2260:
2256:
2252:
2251:
2250:
2246:
2242:
2238:
2237:
2236:
2232:
2228:
2224:
2223:
2222:
2218:
2214:
2210:
2209:
2208:
2204:
2200:
2196:
2195:
2194:
2193:
2192:
2188:
2184:
2180:
2178:
2174:
2170:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2160:
2156:
2152:
2151:
2150:
2146:
2142:
2138:
2135:
2131:
2125:
2118:
2115:
2114:
2113:
2109:
2105:
2100:
2099:
2098:
2094:
2090:
2086:
2083:
2080:
2077:
2074:
2068:
2058:
2051:
2048:
2043:
2040:
2036:
2032:
2028:
2025:
2024:
2022:
2013:
2012:
2008:
2004:
2003:
1999:
1996:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1990:
1989:
1988:
1986:
1985:
1984:
1978:
1974:
1970:
1966:
1962:
1958:
1957:
1941:
1937:
1933:
1929:
1928:
1927:
1923:
1919:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1909:
1905:
1901:
1897:
1896:
1895:
1891:
1887:
1883:
1880:
1877:
1872:
1871:
1870:
1866:
1862:
1857:
1856:
1855:
1854:
1850:
1846:
1841:
1840:
1834:
1833:
1826:
1811:
1807:
1803:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1793:
1789:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1779:
1775:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1764:
1760:
1756:
1752:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1739:
1735:
1734:
1729:
1725:
1721:
1717:
1714:
1713:
1694:
1690:
1686:
1682:
1681:
1679:
1675:
1668:
1661:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1643:
1639:
1638:
1637:
1633:
1629:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1619:
1615:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1559:
1555:
1550:
1549:
1543:
1542:
1532:
1526:
1520:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1506:
1499:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1482:
1477:
1469:
1468:
1464:
1460:
1452:
1449:
1447:
1435:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1405:
1404:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1314:
1310:
1306:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1272:
1268:
1264:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1251:
1250:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1228:
1223:
1217:
1212:
1206:
1201:
1195:
1192:
1189:
1188:
1186:
1183:
1182:
1178:
1173:
1171:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1155:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1131:
1119:
1114:
1104:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
1000:
984:
983:
982:
978:
974:
969:
968:
967:
963:
959:
955:
954:
953:
949:
945:
940:
938:
934:
930:
926:
920:
919:edit conflict
914:
913:
912:
908:
904:
900:
896:
894:
890:
886:
881:
879:
875:
871:
867:
866:
865:
864:
863:
862:
857:
853:
849:
845:
842:
839:
838:
833:
830:
827:
823:
820:
819:
818:
817:
816:
815:
811:
807:
799:
796:
793:
790:
787:
784:
780:
776:
772:
769:
766:
762:
759:". Same with
758:
754:
753:
752:
741:
737:
733:
729:
727:
723:
719:
714:
711:
707:
704:
700:
696:
692:
688:
685:
681:
677:
676:
675:Pontiac fever
668:
661:
657:
649:
646:
642:
638:
630:
626:
622:
621:
620:
616:
612:
607:
602:
601:
600:
596:
592:
588:
585:
582:
578:
574:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
565:
561:
557:
556:User:PizzaMan
552:
546:
545:
539:
538:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
515:
511:
496:
492:
488:
484:
483:
482:
478:
474:
470:
467:
459:
455:
451:
443:
437:
436:
435:
431:
427:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
401:
400:
399:
398:
395:
391:
387:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
371:
370:
366:
365:
361:
357:
352:
351:
350:
342:
341:
336:
335:
334:
326:
321:
317:
314:
311:
308:
305:
302:
299:
298:
297:
294:
290:
281:
272:
271:Vascular navs
263:
254:
252:
246:
244:
239:
238:
234:
228:
226:
220:
218:
212:
210:
205:
202:
196:
192:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
151:
146:
138:
134:
130:
125:
124:
123:
122:
118:
114:
106:
87:
81:
78:
75:
73:
70:
68:
65:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
4938:
4912:
4845:
4795:
4737:
4733:
4726:
4719:
4677:
4670:
4663:
4639:
4613:, this page
4610:
4603:
4591:
4544:
4542:
4538:
4501:
4438:
4399:
4360:
4335:
4326:
4320:
4267:
4262:
4253:
4231:
4215:
4186:
4162:
4103:
4046:
3982:
3962:
3931:Very good. -
3899:
3798:
3686:
3560:
3556:
3552:
3548:
3515:
3511:
3507:
3488:
3468:
3455:
3449:
3397:
3375:
3357:
3354:(later more)
3353:
3338:
3334:
3321:
3313:
3299:
3217:
3181:
3149:neighbouring
3148:
2910:
2899:
2877:
2870:RfC - Layout
2850:
2824:
2801:
2782:Catalaalatac
2779:
2768:
2698:
2661:
2637:
2133:
2041:
2026:
2006:
1994:
1982:
1842:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1727:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1551:
1510:
1486:
1470:
1456:
1450:
1445:
1443:
1398:Use 'below'?
1307:Great work!
1184:
1158:
1149:
1127:
1112:
1091:
1031:
1001:
924:
897:Never mind,
835:
825:
804:
750:
716:you think. -
709:
702:
690:
673:
667:Chest trauma
651:
644:
632:
624:
547:
517:
512:RfC response
453:
449:
353:
348:
347:
345:
337:
330:
295:
256:
249:
241:
230:
223:
215:
207:
204:From above:
203:
200:
186:
144:
109:
100:
60:
43:
37:
4361:Useful link
4069:respiratory
3456:Treatments:
3441:development
3284:development
2636:With this,
2057:Archive top
1983:I suggest:
1536:-- new look
1524:-- old look
650:), like in
36:This is an
4305:/sbox diff
3437:physiology
3391:Overview:
3280:physiology
1446:shows good
925:new layout
774:templates.
289:Virus navs
235:May 2013:
225:Taylornate
197:Background
4862:cartilage
4736:, agree,
4720:Why link?
4630:WP:NAVBOX
4600:cartilage
4299:/doc edit
4293:/subpages
3450:Diseases:
3185:article).
158:IMPLEMENT
80:Archive 5
72:Archive 3
67:Archive 2
61:Archive 1
4897:Tom (LT)
4832:Tom (LT)
4818:PizzaMan
4771:Tom (LT)
4757:PizzaMan
4682:Tom (LT)
4644:Demo 1-C
4545:overview
4465:PizzaMan
4419:PizzaMan
4380:Tom (LT)
4239:Tom (LT)
4192:Tom (LT)
4144:Tom (LT)
4089:Tom (LT)
3986:Tom (LT)
3919:Tom (LT)
3900:overview
3881:Tom (LT)
3818:Tom (LT)
3724:Tom (LT)
3689:Tom (LT)
3680:Outdated
3640:PizzaMan
3594:Tom (LT)
3566:Tom (LT)
3535:Tom (LT)
3472:Tom (LT)
3417:foramina
3260:foramina
3168:Tom (LT)
3124:Tom (LT)
3086:Tom (LT)
3084:thing.--
3024:Tom (LT)
2963:Tom (LT)
2885:Tom (LT)
2745:Tom (LT)
2717:Tom (LT)
2702:PizzaMan
2624:Tom (LT)
2585:Tom (LT)
2554:Tom (LT)
2503:Tom (LT)
2498:PizzaMan
2484:PizzaMan
2456:PizzaMan
2437:PizzaMan
2410:Tom (LT)
2396:Tom (LT)
2368:PizzaMan
2364:Tom (LT)
2332:PizzaMan
2304:PizzaMan
2241:PizzaMan
2213:PizzaMan
2183:PizzaMan
2169:PizzaMan
2155:Tom (LT)
2104:Tom (LT)
1918:PizzaMan
1861:Tom (LT)
1802:PizzaMan
1774:Tom (LT)
1685:Tom (LT)
1658:Checked
1646:Tom (LT)
1600:Tom (LT)
1571:PizzaMan
1417:Tom (LT)
1367:PizzaMan
1353:Tom (LT)
1324:PizzaMan
1309:PizzaMan
1295:Tom (LT)
1161:Tom (LT)
1094:Tom (LT)
1051:PizzaMan
973:Tom (LT)
903:PizzaMan
885:PizzaMan
870:PizzaMan
806:PizzaMan
732:Tom (LT)
710:this RfC
611:PizzaMan
560:PizzaMan
521::-) ). -
405:Tom (LT)
356:Tom (LT)
217:Arcadian
209:Agradman
129:Tom (LT)
113:Tom (LT)
4634:WP:List
4284:history
4043:Cranium
3858:Demo-1B
3856:Added:
3832:|below=
3706:Demo-1B
3704:I like
3619:cranium
3489:dropped
3405:cranium
3399:Anatomy
3248:cranium
3244:Anatomy
3105:, y, z)
2119:re 4.:
1222:Cranium
778:merged.
703:article
625:example
519:system.
464:?) to "
462:|above=
456:called
454:article
39:archive
4917:DePiep
4869:DePiep
4742:DePiep
4648:DePiep
4567:DePiep
4509:DePiep
4483:DePiep
4445:DePiep
4404:DePiep
4341:DePiep
4263:Todo:
4168:DePiep
4130:DePiep
4108:DePiep
4073:DePiep
4051:DePiep
4029:DePiep
4015:DePiep
4001:DePiep
3933:DePiep
3905:DePiep
3862:DePiep
3844:DePiep
3802:DePiep
3754:DePiep
3738:DePiep
3710:DePiep
3623:DePiep
3580:DePiep
3520:DePiep
3493:DePiep
3429:pelvis
3409:facial
3393:Joints
3380:Joints
3343:DePiep
3322:almost
3302:DePiep
3272:pelvis
3252:facial
3239:Joints
3190:DePiep
3153:DePiep
3109:DePiep
3039:DePiep
3005:DePiep
2977:DePiep
2949:DePiep
2856:DePiep
2807:DePiep
2731:DePiep
2669:DePiep
2649:DePiep
2599:DePiep
2569:DePiep
2536:DePiep
2470:DePiep
2441:DePiep
2424:DePiep
2382:DePiep
2360:DePiep
2318:DePiep
2255:DePiep
2227:DePiep
2199:DePiep
2141:DePiep
2134:frozen
2089:DePiep
2031:DePiep
1965:DePiep
1932:DePiep
1904:DePiep
1898:It is
1886:DePiep
1876:WP:AWB
1845:DePiep
1788:DePiep
1755:DePiep
1731:topic.
1674:DePiep
1628:DePiep
1614:DePiep
1585:DePiep
1554:DePiep
1489:DePiep
1459:DePiep
1444:which
1339:DePiep
1281:DePiep
1263:DePiep
1232:DePiep
1135:DePiep
1081:DePiep
1036:DePiep
1006:DePiep
958:DePiep
944:DePiep
929:DePiep
899:DePiep
848:DePiep
718:DePiep
591:DePiep
523:DePiep
487:DePiep
473:DePiep
426:DePiep
419:Isn't
386:DePiep
233:WT:MED
172:DePiep
4784:(UTC)
4596:Bones
4308:/test
4302:/sbox
4287:links
3557:handy
3425:torso
3413:skull
3376:Index
3339:torso
3314:Usage
3268:torso
3256:skull
2831:EJM86
1728:wrong
1716:Recap
695:WP:OR
678:and
243:EJM86
16:<
4921:talk
4913:have
4901:talk
4873:talk
4867:". -
4860:and
4858:bone
4836:talk
4775:talk
4746:talk
4686:talk
4652:talk
4598:and
4571:talk
4565:". -
4513:talk
4487:talk
4449:talk
4408:talk
4384:talk
4345:talk
4336:Done
4321:Done
4296:/doc
4281:talk
4278:edit
4243:talk
4196:talk
4187:Done
4172:talk
4163:Done
4148:talk
4134:talk
4112:talk
4093:talk
4077:talk
4055:talk
4033:talk
4019:talk
4005:talk
3990:talk
3937:talk
3923:talk
3909:talk
3885:talk
3879:. --
3866:talk
3848:talk
3822:talk
3806:talk
3758:talk
3742:talk
3728:talk
3714:talk
3693:talk
3627:talk
3598:talk
3584:talk
3570:talk
3539:talk
3524:talk
3497:talk
3476:talk
3445:cell
3347:talk
3329:and
3306:talk
3288:cell
3194:talk
3182:drop
3172:talk
3157:talk
3128:talk
3113:talk
3090:talk
3043:talk
3028:talk
3009:talk
2981:talk
2967:talk
2953:talk
2889:talk
2860:talk
2851:Done
2835:talk
2811:talk
2802:Done
2786:talk
2749:talk
2735:talk
2721:talk
2673:talk
2653:talk
2628:talk
2603:talk
2589:talk
2573:talk
2558:talk
2540:talk
2507:talk
2474:talk
2445:talk
2428:talk
2414:talk
2400:talk
2386:talk
2362:and
2358:Ok,
2322:talk
2259:talk
2231:talk
2203:talk
2159:talk
2145:talk
2108:talk
2093:talk
2035:talk
1997:done
1969:talk
1959:See
1936:talk
1908:talk
1890:talk
1865:talk
1849:talk
1792:talk
1778:talk
1759:talk
1689:talk
1678:talk
1660:Bone
1650:talk
1642:Bone
1632:talk
1618:talk
1604:talk
1589:talk
1558:talk
1493:talk
1463:talk
1421:talk
1357:talk
1343:talk
1299:talk
1285:talk
1267:talk
1236:talk
1165:talk
1139:talk
1098:talk
1085:talk
1040:talk
1010:talk
977:talk
962:talk
948:talk
933:talk
852:talk
761:GORD
757:RAAS
736:talk
722:talk
691:abbr
662:and
595:talk
527:talk
491:talk
477:talk
430:talk
409:talk
390:talk
360:talk
176:talk
133:talk
117:talk
4732:re
4725:re
4718:re
4607:36.
4481:. -
4400:RfC
4274:}}
3551:to
3510:to
3458:...
3452:...
3435:),
3378:of
3278:),
2072:T=0
2062:...
1902:. -
1746:not
1724:and
1034:. -
1004:. -
327:RfC
170:. -
4923:)
4903:)
4875:)
4853:}}
4847:{{
4838:)
4824:)
4822:♨♨
4801:}}
4797:{{
4777:)
4763:)
4761:♨♨
4748:)
4738:if
4713:}}
4707:{{
4702:}}
4696:{{
4688:)
4654:)
4621:}}
4615:{{
4573:)
4561::
4555:}}
4549:{{
4515:)
4489:)
4471:)
4469:♨♨
4451:)
4425:)
4423:♨♨
4410:)
4386:)
4378:--
4371:}}
4365:{{
4347:)
4270:{{
4245:)
4237:--
4198:)
4174:)
4150:)
4136:)
4114:)
4095:)
4079:)
4057:)
4047:it
4035:)
4021:)
4007:)
3992:)
3984:--
3939:)
3925:)
3911:)
3887:)
3868:)
3850:)
3824:)
3808:)
3760:)
3744:)
3730:)
3716:)
3695:)
3646:)
3644:♨♨
3629:)
3615:}}
3609:{{
3600:)
3586:)
3572:)
3561:if
3541:)
3526:)
3499:)
3478:)
3443:,
3439:,
3431:,
3427:,
3423:,
3419:,
3415:,
3411:,
3407:,
3349:)
3335:un
3320:,
3308:)
3286:,
3282:,
3274:,
3270:,
3266:,
3262:,
3258:,
3254:,
3250:,
3228:}}
3222:{{
3196:)
3174:)
3166:--
3159:)
3130:)
3115:)
3092:)
3045:)
3030:)
3011:)
2983:)
2969:)
2955:)
2891:)
2883:--
2862:)
2837:)
2829:.
2813:)
2788:)
2751:)
2737:)
2723:)
2708:)
2706:♨♨
2675:)
2655:)
2630:)
2605:)
2591:)
2575:)
2560:)
2542:)
2509:)
2501:--
2490:)
2488:♨♨
2476:)
2462:)
2460:♨♨
2447:)
2430:)
2416:)
2402:)
2388:)
2374:)
2372:♨♨
2338:)
2336:♨♨
2324:)
2310:)
2308:♨♨
2290:.
2261:)
2247:)
2245:♨♨
2233:)
2219:)
2217:♨♨
2205:)
2189:)
2187:♨♨
2175:)
2173:♨♨
2161:)
2147:)
2127:}}
2121:{{
2110:)
2095:)
2070:}}
2064:{{
2060:}}
2054:{{
2042:no
2037:)
1971:)
1938:)
1924:)
1922:♨♨
1910:)
1892:)
1867:)
1859:--
1851:)
1808:)
1806:♨♨
1794:)
1780:)
1761:)
1691:)
1680:)
1670:}}
1664:{{
1652:)
1634:)
1620:)
1606:)
1598:--
1591:)
1577:)
1575:♨♨
1560:)
1534:}}
1528:{{
1522:}}
1516:{{
1495:)
1479:}}
1473:{{
1465:)
1437:}}
1431:{{
1423:)
1373:)
1371:♨♨
1359:)
1345:)
1330:)
1328:♨♨
1315:)
1313:♨♨
1301:)
1287:)
1269:)
1238:)
1225:}}
1219:{{
1214:}}
1208:{{
1203:}}
1197:{{
1167:)
1141:)
1100:)
1087:)
1057:)
1055:♨♨
1042:)
1012:)
979:)
964:)
950:)
935:)
909:)
907:♨♨
891:)
889:♨♨
876:)
874:♨♨
854:)
812:)
810:♨♨
765:GI
763:,
738:)
724:)
670:}}
664:{{
659:}}
653:{{
640:}}
634:{{
617:)
615:♨♨
597:)
566:)
564:♨♨
529:)
493:)
479:)
445:}}
439:{{
432:)
411:)
392:)
362:)
292:}}
286:{{
283:}}
277:{{
274:}}
268:{{
265:}}
259:{{
178:)
135:)
119:)
76:→
4919:(
4899:(
4871:(
4834:(
4820:(
4773:(
4759:(
4744:(
4684:(
4650:(
4588:.
4569:(
4511:(
4507:-
4485:(
4467:(
4447:(
4443:-
4421:(
4406:(
4382:(
4343:(
4339:-
4310:)
4290:#
4276:(
4241:(
4230::
4194:(
4170:(
4146:(
4132:(
4110:(
4091:(
4075:(
4053:(
4031:(
4017:(
4003:(
3988:(
3935:(
3921:(
3907:(
3903:-
3883:(
3864:(
3846:(
3842:-
3820:(
3804:(
3800:-
3756:(
3740:(
3726:(
3712:(
3691:(
3642:(
3625:(
3596:(
3582:(
3568:(
3537:(
3522:(
3495:(
3474:(
3403:(
3401::
3345:(
3304:(
3246:(
3192:(
3170:(
3155:(
3126:(
3111:(
3088:(
3041:(
3026:(
3007:(
2979:(
2965:(
2951:(
2887:(
2858:(
2833:(
2809:(
2784:(
2747:(
2733:(
2719:(
2704:(
2671:(
2667:-
2651:(
2626:(
2601:(
2587:(
2571:(
2567:-
2556:(
2538:(
2534:-
2505:(
2486:(
2472:(
2458:(
2443:(
2426:(
2412:(
2398:(
2384:(
2370:(
2334:(
2320:(
2306:(
2287:.
2257:(
2243:(
2229:(
2215:(
2201:(
2185:(
2171:(
2157:(
2143:(
2106:(
2091:(
2087:-
2044:.
2033:(
2029:-
2009:)
1967:(
1934:(
1920:(
1906:(
1888:(
1863:(
1847:(
1804:(
1790:(
1776:(
1757:(
1687:(
1676:(
1648:(
1630:(
1616:(
1602:(
1587:(
1573:(
1556:(
1491:(
1487:-
1461:(
1419:(
1369:(
1355:(
1341:(
1337:-
1326:(
1311:(
1297:(
1283:(
1265:(
1234:(
1230:-
1163:(
1137:(
1133:-
1096:(
1083:(
1053:(
1038:(
1008:(
975:(
960:(
946:(
931:(
921:)
917:(
905:(
887:(
872:(
850:(
808:(
734:(
720:(
613:(
593:(
562:(
525:(
489:(
475:(
428:(
424:-
407:(
388:(
358:(
322:)
174:(
131:(
115:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.