Template talk:Messianic Judaism

1701:

while also maintaining hard-fought "territory" that would be censored by the sheer number and weight of Anti-Messianic popular opinion, rather than by anything substantial. There are only so many pages that two regular Messianic editors can only conceivably support and maintain without getting their stuff deleted all over the place by zealous anti-Messianics. I can't even seem to devote time to a arbitration request because I'm having to spend what little time I do have in arguing over semantics, rules, and regulations, with those who have the time to engage me there, where others assisting them have the time to delete, edit, modify, remove, and otherwise engage in "minor" content censorship that eventually changes the entire NPOV of some important articles. The battle to keep content from being censored against by popular opinion vs hard evidence refuting such content, is overwhelming - for no matter who says that Knowledge isn't a battleground, it certainly is in the minds of those who have a stated and documented desire to see all things Messianic disappear from Knowledge. So until the Messianic editor team gets more volunteers willing to step up to the plate and protect what currently exists; I don't think a portal is going to happen anytime soon. But then again, I think a portal would be a great idea - and perhaps the Messianic team should consider "retreating" to just maintaining a portal for now, that is...until someone decides to one day post a threat of a 3RR violation over a semantical issue over its own

1937:

community is alone a fact that makes it an appropriate symbol on this template in order to match the templates of other religions that also have a top set religious symbol. Inventing a new symbol not in use by even a large minority, could considered original research, and adding or replacing it with a Magen David, though agreeable with me, and probably sourceable enough so as to win a dispute on its inclusion, right now is not agreeable with the popular Jewish consensus, and this template has already had its share of fights just to get it to be the way it is now. You are welcome to follow the process outlined and exampled in this template above to encourage sourcing, discussion, and deliberations on the inclusion of a lone Magen David, but simply inserting it without giving such a debate enough time to cover all the bases - especially on this template - could be construed as premature and outright disruptive and liable to start a revert war between the larger non Messianic Jewish editing community and the practically non-existent Messianic editing community. We have to pick our struggles here wisely, and to be honest, a debate over the Magen David, though commendable, probably could be better reserved for when we do get a larger Messianic community involved in editing on Knowledge in order to answer objections to it. In the meantime, I would ask that you consider helping us simply organize a to do list on the project page, and if you haven't joined the project, please consider doing so.

1971:

in the movement. However, a quick search of the internet shows that it's mostly gentiles who are pushing to mainstream the symbol. Messianic Judaism, though inclusive of gentile believers who wish to cast their lot with the Jews, is a Jewish movement. Most gentiles who choose to participate are fully aware of this fact, or why would they choose to participate at all? MJAA is the foremost Messianic Jewish organization whose primary goal is to bring the Good News of their Messiah to the Jewish people (would you agree with that?) You write ""ethnically"-exclusive MJAA" (though I believe they do allow non-jewish "honorary" members) as if it's a bad thing - is it wrong for Jews to have their own movement? Is it wrong for them to have their OWN country, people, beliefs, or is it not politically correct in America today? The Torah says that Israel (Jacob) will always be a nation before God (Jeremiah 31.35-37). I would also strongly disagree that the "Messianic Seal" has been recognized by the secular community (I sure hope it won't be!). Magen David with M in the middle would not represent a NEW symbol - just a clarification of how it applies to MJ. If Magen David can't be used on Knowledge to represent MJ, I think that we'd be better off not using anything at all. --

1903:

furious the moment I saw that the monstrosity that some call "Messianic Seal" is representing the Messianic Judaism. I am sorry guys, but the few times that I saw this symbol used, it was by fringes of Messianic Movement (and mostly gentiles). It's obviously fake origins (was Magen David even used in the first century by Jews as a common symbol? I don't think so.). The fact that this seal has been simply ignored or outright rejected by most in mainstream Messianic Jewish movement, I do not want this symbol to erode the Jewishness of the Messianic Judaism. Look around the internet and you will see that this seal is a marketing gimmick from the writers of the "The Messianic Seal of the Jerusalem Church", Reuven Efraim Scmalz and Raymond Robert Fischer (

1775:

legitimate (or any other "ism" other than their own, for that matter), not even consider their converts as Jews. But you don't have a problem with either using Magen David. Messianic Jews are Jews (ethnically, culturally and they believe also religiously) and they consider Jewish symbols such as the Magen David as their very own - they don't use crosses, fishes, or anything else. You know full well that Messianic Jewish movement uses Magen David and/or Menorah as its symbols, and I gave you a list of major MJ websites for your reference. This is not my original research or idea, as you tried to insinuate by pointing me to

447:. It is my opinion that there is no reason not to do so again since much of its design already serves as one of the best religious templates on Knowledge. A tool is a tool, not an article. Charges of tool "plagiarism," seem ridiculous in my opinion, since if it's useful, why not use a modification of it? The previous Messianic Judaism template has been archived for easy resurrection. If one thinks that the archived Messianic Judaism template looks too much like the Judaism template, does this pose a Knowledge policy problem? What Knowledge policy would be violated if such a design were used again? 1745:). In fact, the few places one can find it are usually cheap jewelry web sites or on Ephraimite Movement websites (Gentile movement that claims to be the lost "and found" tribes of Israel!). I propose using Magen David as a symbol for Messianic Judaism as it is the symbol used by most Messianic Jewish organizations. There are some Rabbinical Judaism users on Knowledge which try to impose on Messianic Judaism which symbols it can and cannot use. It's tantamount to religious intolerance. I propose leaving it to proponents of Messianic Judaism to define its symbols. 1587:, Kirby? You are telling me that it is a mistake to honestly reveal my identity (halakhic Messianic Judaism) and intentions for editing Knowledge (improving the encyclopedia content, with a focus on the MJ articles), and ethical to do the opposite? Obviously whatever case you're talking about was bad stuff, and that scientologist guy had no business being unilaterally banned in such a fashion. Have you no shame or sense of justice? It's called a NPOV and everyone is responsible for maintaining one here. 1827:

is not exclusively owned by rabbinic Judaism, and that the Messianic community does use the Magen David to represent itself to each other and to outsiders as well as the Messianic Seal. In fact, the Magen David is more popular than the seal itself, however for purpose of reaching a compromise with the Jewish editing community on Knowledge, I believe the Messianic Seal is the most appropriate logo to be put on this template since it is used by a good number of Messianic congregations and ministries.

99: 879:

the stubs for it remain. The problem was that I'd like to see the links as a continuous list whether or not the section is expanded, but since the code relies on blocks, each section has (potentially) two lists. I don't think that looks very good. First point, what do you think of that approach? Second point, if the line break doesn't matter to y'all should I add the hidden sections back in (and just fix it up if/when the tech improves)?

1783:) on the Messianic Judaism page itself! Is that photo ALSO confusing and deceptive to you? I am not trying to convince you, just pointing to others on Knowledge your proactive personal bias towards Messianic Judaism. Using words like "hijack Jewish symbols" - are you not speaking emotionally, from personal bias? I think it's a problem, especially since you seem to set yourself up as some kind of authority on this website. Kakdela2118 212: 657: 1753: 154: 130: 1253:? We don't, and I don't know if we should expect them to. One can expect that on may subjects, the MJ view is going to be very similar (or even identical) to either a Christian view or a Jewish view. In the absence of an article detailing the subtle differences, why not link to the "main" article? The absence of a link would seem to indicate that the concept is not relevant to MJ at all, 164: 1907:), as well as the myriad of T-shirt peddlers around the internet. However, since it seems that the "ruling" majority on Knowledge will continue to revert our changes to the symbol, perhaps a Magen David with M in it's center to represent Messianic Judaism on Knowledge would pacify them. What do you fellow wikipedians think? -- 985:, which can certainly be added. But I guess I was looking for comparisons of the design and structure primarily, as they establish a visual identity. (A major complaint was that it looked confusingly similar to the Judaism template.) The content of the template is easily changed, and will likely do so over time. ⇔ 1062:

I guess they want more sources to include such links on a navigation template. So, post in the subsection above, and source away. I'd feel better if individual item listings were discussed and debated, rather than baby-with-the-bathwater blanket TfD nominations. This tempalte is a navigation TOOL not

1902:

Thank you all of your comments. Humus, I understand your position and I do respect it (in some ways). Frankly, if I viewed Messianic Judaism the way you seem to view it, I would probably also oppose their use of Magen David. Like you, I would like to avoid conflict. Although I must admit being quite

1970:

Inigmatus, first of all, I appreciate your valiant fight to keep the content on the MJ article from being defaced - I know it must be frustrating and time consuming. So, thank you! Getting back to our discussion - yes the fringe that supports the Messianic Seal is composed of both Jews and gentiles

1826:

Thanks for clarifying that Daniel. I saw it was removed by him, then I saw his post here, so I figured it was because he disagreed with its existence on this template. However it should be noted that I agree with kakdela in his position that the Magen David is also an appropriate symbol, in that it

1801:

In this case, Humus is agreeing with you. Kakdela2118 is the one removing what he/she terms the "illegitimate symbol" of the seal, choosing to replace it with a Magen David. I was actually just about to leave a message on your talk page asking you to comment, since I know that you introduced it and

1412:

Name a single aspect in which it is better. Because whereas the last template was a comprehensive linkbase of information relative to many different aspects of this religious movement, this one is written from an extremely angular perspective and censors any information certain groups don't like to

1096:

I believe the currrent code needs cleaning up. I don't think we need show/hide sections for the template. I believe they are a distraction and even borders on censorship to a point - as if we're trying to hide links that others might be offended at seeing. The most important reason I think the code

424:

A template to provide easy navigation from exclusive Messianic Judaism articles to non exclusive Messianic Judaism articles dealing with terms and concepts that a visitor to a Torah observant Messianic Jewish synagogue would encounter, for which either a separate subsection in such an article would

259:

1844:

Indeed, I do agree that the Magen David is in common use in MJ communities, but I'm also glad that we have an alternative here to prevent confusion for readers. If we were using the Magen David here there'd have to be some kind of differentiation from Judaism, and that would lead to horrible fiery

1269:

until the more specific article was fleshed out. Furthermore, if Christianity did not have a concept of God that was distinct from the "typical understanding" contained in that article, yet "God" was very important to that faith, I also see no reason why that template couldn't continue to link to

878:

So this is a compromise. The idea (put forth before the last TfD) was that "common" topics remain on the MJ template, but hidden by default. Only topics unique to MJ would be always-visible. Since the technology isn't quite "there" yet, I've pushed off that design for future improvement, though

753:

That looks like a very good start. It's to-the-point and avoids the bloat of the previous version. A question about the image - is that an image representative of and widely used by the movement, like the Magen David is for Judaism, or the cross and fish for Christianity, or is it something that's

264:

Clearly because of the vicious POV attacks on the last template, I would ask that all contributors to this template source their contributions and/or objections. This is a template folks, not an article; so there is and should be some leniency in this template's development, but some seem to think

832:

As I said, in the above subsection, I intend to post sources for every item included in the list, as to the article's relevancy to Messianic Judaism. If someone wishes to dispute a listed item, dispute it there in the subsection above. Don't bring the entire template to TfD without first debating

1700:

The goal sounds laudable, if and only if a portal was created. However, like most grand solutions to the Messianic vs Anti-Messianic disputes, most of us don't have time to create or update a portal. There are just too few Messianic and Messianic-supporting editors to keep such a project running

1774:

Confusing and deceptive? I must respectfully disagree. That's YOUR personal (and emotional) opinion, and nothing to do with the facts. It's not for you to judge whether Messianic Judaism should be considered part of Judaism. Orthodox Jews do not consider Reform or Humanistic (atheistic) Judaism

479:

If someone wishes to dispute these rules for submission, guidelines for discussion, or content submissions, please post below the item, or open up a new topic on this discussion page and notate that such a discussion exists below, or create a subpage and link the discussion to them here. Please

310:

will be reminded in any TfD regarding this template, that this dispute resolution notice is in place from the very beginning, and the admin reviewing any TfD of this template will be asked to consider whether or not the nominee has actually bothered to discuss their specific dispute here before

1936:

The Messianic Seal, irregardless of its origins, is in use by the Messianic community today. I would dispute the idea that it's use is only by the "fringe" if of course you mean that the "fringe" is all Messianic believers except the "ethnically"-exclusive MJAA. Its recognition by the secular

1383:

way I see this being resolved right now is if some neutral third party can come in with some authority and knock some heads around, and hands down an official statement of WP policies as applied to this topic. It's not just this template, it's the whole relationship between two RL communities

1677:

What do you think about that? If you want to find links to absolutely everything that is relevant to the MJ worldview, you visit the portal. The template would contain only those articles that are within the purview of the Project, the ones that are specific to MJ. Would this be a solution

819:

I think it's reasonable to start with a Template like this, that sticks strictly to Messianic topics. However, if the Template starts filling up again with general Judaism links (the reason it was deleted in the first place), then it would immediately become a candidate for speedy deletion.

1728:

I think that there's a definite problem with the so called "Messianic Seal" that is currently used to symbolize Messianic Judaism in this Template. There is no legitimate archaeological evidence for its authenticity. This seal is not used by any major Jewish Messianic organizations: MJAA

1037:

I think you can call it a consensus on the design (yours), and a consensus on the content (Ju's). Feel free to change the design. If someone balks they can always speak up here. I really don't think having one template look like another is a sufficient reason to not have the same design.

1155:

of content and the "borrowed" Judaism template appearance that might have confused readers or given a false impression about the relationship between J and MJ. This new template changes the format (one part fixed) and hides the "shared" content by default (other part fixed). There's

592:

Messianics use these very names of HaShem in their liturgy, speech, and other forms of communication. People visiting a Messianic synagogue would be exposed to these names, thus the reason for their inclusion in the template. The creation of an exclusively Messianic article like

1115:

to the articles it's included on, which is a nice convenience. However, many MJ articles begin with "messianic", to the point that it's unhelpful to read an alphabetical list when one gets to the Ms. I plan on adding an optional "sort" parameter to fix this. ⇔

1008:

I think the alternating colors helps readability, use of sections help usability, and I changed the header to a more space-saving layout. Essentially, that's the difference. However, I'll let someone else make the final decision on which proposal gets used. ⇔

339:

Discuss here your reasons for your support of the current primary goals of this template. I currently believe that such a template would be useful, and at the very least would be necessary in all the points mentioned. Other religions have similar templates, see

244:

In yet another grand effort to achieve consensus, instead of POV pushing (on either the Jewish or Messianic Jewish side) I wish to discuss the primary goal of this template. To do so, a need must be demonstrated for its existence, and such needs are as follows:

900:

Although complicated, there is a way for an admin to merge the two talk histories. It's the process used to fix a cut-and-paste merge and requires some liberal delting, renaming, moving, and restoring. If necessary, I will do that once we have a template. --

1169:

Although the borrowed content was mentioned in the TfD nomination, if you actually read the TfD discussion, that rationale was actually rebuffed by a number of "delete" !votes. If you review the other religion templates, you'll find that, for example, in

279:

The content of navigable material in this template, was in dispute in two prior TfDs. One was keep, the other was delete. Neither side could achieve consensus on the content. It is the desire of this talk page to move with consensus, and not force another

774:

It is called the "Messianic Seal of Jerusalem". It has been found on some pottery, which lead some to claim it is thousands of years old, although others claim that it was an archeological hoax. Regardless, it has been used since the late 1960's. --

1759:

Either do not use any image at all or find another image, but do not hijack commonly accepted symbols of other religions such as Judaism. It is confusing and deceptive and (speaking of tolerance) intolerant. As for your "proposal" - please see

1341:

I imagine if someone finds an article/topic they'd like to contribute to, they wisely read the talk page first, and note the project template that should be present at the top. At least, that appears to be the SOP, from what I've seen. ⇔

1527:

Maybe so, but my general example still stands. Scientology and Messianic Judaism, while they have few supporters here in WP, those supporters are often very dogmatic regarding their views. I think the dogmatism of noogster and terryeo is

890:(since it's already been mentioned in various placed, I assumed most interested parties knew of its existence) because when it's ready to go live, the move from user to template space will wipe out this talk page. But maybe that's OK? ⇔ 1331:

This is quite reasonable. Since I am fairly new to Knowledge, though, tell me, how will people be able to know that the MJ Wikiproject exists? The project pages themselves do seem to be getting into a little bit of a decrepit state.

1073:

Sounds like a case of J trying to dictate permissible beliefs to MJ. "No, that's ours, you can't have it." Good grief... Other religions get along on WP even though they may refer (link) to the same concept/thing, so why is it

998:

I like either or. I personally like the alternating colors. I didnt realize I put Ju's template in over ChristTrekker. I was really just wanting to get a template put in. Feel free to modify the template with your modications of

514:

If you are going to mark discussions as "Accepted or Not accepted" it must include "per consensus" since the purpose of this template is to completely avoid POV pushing and involve the consensus decisions of all participants.

1277:

seemingly want to treat messianics as something wholly different and distinct, relegated to their own articles. Yet now that it is time to make a template, they want to treat messianics as a subset of Judaism, only allowing

1476:, where a Scientologist was banned from editing the Scientology template, as well as all Scientology related articles. Don't make the same mistake. Looking at your behavior, I am sorry to say it may be too late. Thanks.-- 754:

been put together for wikipedia or some other limited public offering? The content of it is fine, but it's very busy, for lack of a better term, and looks a bit hacked together. Something simpler would be more appealing.

1845:

conflict. I'm warming to the Messianic seal from an aesthetic viewpoint as well too, after initially finding it a bit overbearing. Everything within it flows together nicely, which I suppose is kind of the point. ;)

867:, it is also valid to say that since there is already a "primary" navigation for general Jewish subjects, a nav guide for a sub-area of Judaism ought to restrict itself to that sub-area, which makes complete sense 407:

A template to provide easy navigation from exclusive Messianic Judaism articles to non exclusive Messianic Judaism articles that would otherwise be redundant with an exclusive Messianic Judaism version of the same

255:

1385: 784:

Interesting, this is the first time I've seen it. It's not very elegant, but from what you've said it seems appropriate for the template. I'm actually interested enough now to do some research on it myself. :)

1136:

I've removed the stuff that was the whole source of the TFD in the first place. This template is about stuff uniquely related to Messianic Judaism, not stuff already on the Judaism and Christianity templates.

1705:! That's when participating in Knowledge as a Messianic editor becomes sheer madness at that point, and those in WikiProject Judaism start congratulating each other for having the "Messianic threat reduced". 1786:

Humus, go pick on another topic in Messianic Judaism. The Seal is not in dispute. I posted tons of sources, and even my own Messianic congregation uses the symbol - as well as others in the Denver area.

1663:

Last I recall, there was remained a disagreement about Talmud, especially in light of the fact that a number of Messianic sources discussed the "dangers" of the Talmud and Rabbinic Judaism. --

1097:

for show/hide needs to be deleted is that on some browsers the code messes up the presentation of the template badly - like overwriting the template category headings to make them unreadable.

265:

otherwise. A template is a tool, not an article. Unsubstantiated and unsourced charges of POV pushing over a "tool" that aims to be NPOV about a certain POV, will do this template no good.

922:

For the sake of continuity, I will post the first code that you've shown here. If I made a mistake, feel free to modify the code to fit your suggestion so we can at least have something.

1053:

This template is an absolute insult. Tell me here if anyone knows, what was the problem with the previous template? All of the links were relevant. Because this one is total garbage.

2031: 1464:

And how exactly was it a farce? Because it didn't agree with your preconceived notions? And also, I think Messianic Judaism is a farce. Who cares? It doesn't matter. It's not

2036: 1468:

to this discussion. This talk page is for improving the Messianic Judaism template. I believe that by openly admitting you are a messianic, you're asking to be blocked per

852:

The original is up top, the new one below. I've stripped it down to the bare essentials—that was one of the suggestions put forth during TfD debate. In the interests of

39: 2041: 391:

A template to provide easy navigation from exclusive Messianic Judaism articles to subsections related to Messianic Judaism, on non exclusive Messianic Judaism articles

252:

A template to provide easy navigation from exclusive Messianic Judaism articles to subsections related to Messianic Judaism, on non exclusive Messianic Judaism articles

302:

Furthermore, all contributors and objectors to this template agree that all future disputes about this template MUST be discussed here FIRST; and not in a future

2021: 2026: 1352: 1318: 545: 738: 2046: 1565:

To answer your question, it's no longer likely to be mistaken for the Judaism template, which was the problem many people were bothered by at the TfD. --

1473: 74: 1202:

also does an admirable job of making its links specifically relevant to Christianity. This template should concentrate on what makes Messianic Judaism

1648:

I've removed the protection in the hope that everyone can get along and use talk pages for consensus. Edit warring will just get this locked again. --

425:

be redundant with the rest of the article, or the article itself would be redundant with a separately created Messianic Judaism article or subsection.

260:

be redundant with the rest of the article, or the article itself would be redundant with a separately created Messianic Judaism article or subsection.

221: 140: 186: 581: 569: 605: 1402:

The current iteration of the template is enormously better than when I last saw it (during a deletion debate). Well done to all concerned. --

557: 80: 1515: 701: 887: 535: 177: 135: 1286:—i.e. read about Judaism first, then read up about this "flavor" of it. Is this schizophrenia or hypocrisy? I'm honestly curious. 630:. It looks as a good starting point for the next one. It focuses on Messianic-Judaic specific topics in the religion template style. 1392: 1719:

There was another attempt here to hijack Jewish symbols and replace the current one with Magen David. Please don't do it again. ←

318:

This is the development goal of this template. Suggestions would be appreciated. Please begin the discussion below this notice.

1544: 1492: 465:

All submissions must meet accepted Knowledge policies, and also must meet the primary goals of this template as listed above.

20: 1426:

It conforms much ore closely to the community consensus on TfD. That in and of itself is both necessary and sufficient. --

1290:

it is distinct, it should be accorded the right to link to whatever is necessary to give an accurate portrayal of itself.

846: 69: 673: 110: 594: 1635: 982: 677: 276:

This template is to be designed as a religious navigation template, similar to other religious navigation templates.

60: 1779:, but Messianic Judaism's JEWISH symbols.If you are not sure of that fact, see the photo of the Messianic synagogue ( 697: 656: 1379:

going to improve. How do we go about requesting some kind of high-level arbitration or whatever-you-call-it? The

1279: 1126:

This is done. I've also reviewed the articles that started with M and sorted those that seemed good candidates. ⇔

1112: 724: 638: 24: 669: 859:

Personally, I feel that many of the Judaism and Christian topics certainly have a place in a MJ nav template. (

685: 711: 429:

I think there are no objections to this primary goal. Anyone else want to add something about this goal here?

412:

I think there are no objections to this primary goal. Anyone else want to add something about this goal here?

395:

I think there are no objections to this primary goal. Anyone else want to add something about this goal here?

379:

I think there are no objections to this primary goal. Anyone else want to add something about this goal here?

1313:

Please do not add a link to a WikiProject. This is a self reference and should not be in the template as per

598: 588: 1067: 1057: 1752: 1160:

for saying that certain Knowledge articles are barred from being linked to by certain other articles!!! ⇔

1294:

it is a subset, then it should be accorded the right to be included more fully in the "main" articles. ⇔

875:

I think it is completely understandable that the sub-area's nav template be complete and self-contained.

2003: 1262: 1199: 807:

I agree with the start. Feel free to create it with a note that current consensus favors it as a start.

681: 116: 1972: 1908: 499: 1999: 1692: 1539: 1487: 1226: 169: 50: 185:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1878: 1852: 1809: 1765: 1720: 1679: 1518:

were he to be an employee or officer thereof. The Terryo case was NPOV, not COI, IIRC anyway. --

1389: 1343: 1295: 1245:

that someone investigating MJ on Knowledge will make themselves familiar with the "base" form of

1234: 1161: 1127: 1117: 1079: 1028: 1010: 986: 955: 937: 911: 891: 792: 761: 506: 65: 978: 693: 1270:

the article. This is a quite reasonable position, and I don't see why it should be prohibited.

1609: 1250: 1211: 646: 361: 46: 1283: 444: 1601: 1219: 1183: 2007: 1975: 1941: 1938: 1911: 1881: 1860: 1831: 1828: 1817: 1795: 1792: 1768: 1723: 1709: 1706: 1695: 1688: 1682: 1667: 1652: 1642: 1613: 1591: 1569: 1549: 1529: 1522: 1511: 1497: 1477: 1447: 1430: 1417: 1406: 1359: 1346: 1336: 1325: 1298: 1258: 1236: 1171: 1164: 1141: 1130: 1120: 1101: 1098: 1082: 1064: 1042: 1039: 1031: 1013: 1003: 1000: 989: 971: 958: 947: 940: 926: 923: 914: 905: 894: 837: 834: 824: 811: 808: 800: 779: 769: 689: 611: 608: 519: 516: 509: 484: 481: 451: 448: 433: 430: 416: 413: 399: 396: 383: 380: 368: 365: 324: 321: 856:

I tossed some of my initial idea (see below) for now rather than waiting on others.

2015: 1846: 1803: 1588: 1507: 1469: 1444: 1414: 1356: 1333: 1322: 1314: 1274: 1231: 1223: 1054: 786: 755: 480:

archive and/or move long discussions off to a subpage and include a link to it here.

312: 307: 303: 288: 285: 281: 1904: 1780: 211: 1776: 1761: 1664: 1649: 1605: 1566: 1519: 1427: 1403: 1175: 968: 902: 776: 345: 182: 833:

individual item listings here first and making a substantiated case against them.

375:

A template to provide easy navigation between exclusive Messianic Judaism articles

360:. It is my desire to see a similar template designed as a navigation template for 249:

A template to provide easy navigation between exclusive Messianic Judaism articles

1191: 964: 951: 627: 1514:

issue. A conflict of interest would be more along the lines of his editing of

1138: 1023:

If this version is used, note that there's currently some stuff enclosed in a

821: 159: 153: 129: 1596:

Yes, they are. But they're also responsible for abiding by consensus on what

1187: 863:

is certainly as relevant to Messianic Jews as to any other group of Jews.)

602: 357: 163: 1375:

Y'all have gone and gotten the template locked? This situation is clearly

954:'s template without discussing the merits of one design over the other. ⇔ 1639: 349: 1737:) doesn't use it, neither does Union of Messianic Jewish Congregations ( 1788: 1246: 967:'s template currenty, as it contains articles that are MJ-specific. -- 353: 542:

All Exclusively Messianic Judaism articles, categories, portals, lists

1182:...thus making the link relevant to Islam. "Academics" is linked to 860: 665: 576: 564: 1791:

If you want pictures of the symbol's use, I'll be happy to provide.

1388:

could be reached, but part of me knew that was overly optimistic. ⇔

471:

Please follow the format here to propose new items in the template.

1534: 1482: 552: 341: 1877:

I appreciate your efforts to avoid a "horrible fiery conflict". ←

1604:

unbiased version on everyone else. They're called banned users. -

1384:

bleeding over into blatant in-WP POV warring. I'd hoped that an

1147:

Excuse me, but I don't remember it ever being stated that it was

1063:

a POV pusher or censor, and I want both sides to realize this.

1266: 1195: 1179: 92: 15: 1998:

Shouldn't this category's name be changed like the others? --

1218:

Judaism is little more than linkcruft at best, and Messianic

468:

Please provide sources for every single claim for or against.

210: 1367: 580:*Not accepted per consensus. See archived discussion here 1078:

to cooperate in this case? I really don't understand. ⇔

871:

the sub-area is recognized by the parent. If it is not,

1634:

This template is protected, and should be tagged with {{

1855: 1812: 1738: 795: 764: 1742: 1734: 1730: 1638:}}, or another suitable protection template. Thanks – 1282:

to link to topics if they are not already included in

544:*Accepted per consensus. See archived discussion here 1781:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:Messianic_synagogue.jpg

1733:) doesn't use it, British Messianic Jewish Alliance ( 1502:

Note: In general, Noogster's being a Messianic would

1443:

Not when much of the TfD process was itself a farce.

489:

If you are going to move discussions off this page,

181:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1673:suggestion: template==exclusive MJ, portal==all MJ 1368:where's the benevolent dictator when you need him? 1905:http://www.olimpublications.com/MessianicSeal.htm 1351:Please see my comments in the last paragraph at 1600:NPOV. We have a name for people who impose the 1273:This situation is quite strange. On one hand, 536:User talk:ChristTrekker/MJtemplate#Article List 298:Navigable Content Dispute Resolution Commitment 1472:. If you want an example of this, please see 732: 8: 1741:) or Intentional Messianic Jewish Alliance ( 1353:Template talk:Messianic Judaism/Exclusive MJ 1319:Template talk:Messianic Judaism/Exclusive MJ 977:My template contains all those links except 306:FIRST. A contributor who wishes to submit a 2032:Template-Class Jewish Christianity articles 1317:and my previous comments on this matter at 2037:NA-importance Jewish Christianity articles 739: 725: 124: 910:Thanks, Avi, the offer is appreciated. ⇔ 886:thinking that we'd do all pre-discussion 109:does not require a rating on Knowledge's 2042:WikiProject Jewish Christianity articles 1241:I guess my thought is this: How do we 1214:, and linking to everything that makes 126: 1261:was not yet written, I'd fully expect 632: 443:The previous template used code from 175:This template is within the scope of 98: 96: 7: 2022:Template-Class Christianity articles 1789:http://iacmusic.com/symbolspage.html 1516:Messianic Jewish Alliance of America 1027:block while it's in my userspace. ⇔ 702:Messianic Jewish Alliance of America 2027:NA-importance Christianity articles 115:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 531:Post your submissions below here: 195:Knowledge:WikiProject Christianity 14: 2047:WikiProject Christianity articles 1151:that caused the TfD. It was the 1048: 946:Any further comment? Seems like 595:Names of God in Messianic Judaism 198:Template:WikiProject Christianity 1751: 655: 162: 152: 128: 97: 40:Click here to start a new topic. 1678:satisfactory to all parties? ⇔ 854:just getting something in place 222:WikiProject Jewish Christianity 698:Messianic Bureau International 219:This template is supported by 1: 1131:21:56, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 1121:17:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 1083:17:53, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 1068:17:12, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 1058:22:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 1043:23:05, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1032:22:38, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1014:22:34, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 1004:21:40, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 990:21:02, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 972:19:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 959:19:44, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 941:04:07, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 927:21:08, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 915:04:07, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 906:20:53, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 895:18:59, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 838:17:08, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 825:16:13, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 812:14:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 801:13:11, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 780:12:50, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 770:12:20, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 452:05:49, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 369:05:27, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 325:05:25, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 189:and see a list of open tasks. 37:Put new text under old text. 2008:08:22, 3 November 2011 (UTC) 932:Eh? You're not referring to 597:would be 100% redunant with 457:Navigable Content Discussion 1802:know quite a lot about it. 1257:! To use your example, if 1158:absolutely no justification 983:Messianic Seal of Jerusalem 678:Messianic Seal of Jerusalem 475:Guidelines for discussion: 45:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 2063: 1653:03:06, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 1643:20:12, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 1299:17:17, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 1280:Template:Messianic Judaism 1210:is covered in the article 1113:Category:Messianic Judaism 1976:13:13, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 1942:02:11, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 1912:01:49, 27 July 2007 (UTC) 1882:20:28, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 1861:18:56, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 1832:18:50, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 1818:18:42, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 1796:17:40, 26 July 2007 (UTC) 1769:20:17, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 1724:10:05, 23 July 2007 (UTC) 1614:01:00, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 1592:00:54, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 1570:23:52, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 1550:02:58, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 1523:02:06, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 1498:23:44, 8 March 2007 (UTC) 1448:22:39, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 1431:22:22, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 1418:22:14, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 1407:15:39, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 1393:15:30, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1373:Oh for crying out loud... 1360:07:58, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1347:04:12, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1337:03:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1326:20:26, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 1255:which would be inaccurate 1237:04:03, 7 March 2007 (UTC) 1165:04:48, 5 March 2007 (UTC) 1142:20:05, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 847:possible starter template 635: 218: 147: 123: 75:Be welcoming to newcomers 1710:15:42, 19 May 2007 (UTC) 686:Chosen People Ministries 612:15:11, 19 May 2007 (UTC) 520:15:14, 19 May 2007 (UTC) 485:15:11, 19 May 2007 (UTC) 434:15:01, 19 May 2007 (UTC) 417:15:01, 19 May 2007 (UTC) 400:15:01, 19 May 2007 (UTC) 384:15:01, 19 May 2007 (UTC) 178:WikiProject Christianity 1696:05:18, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 1683:15:35, 4 May 2007 (UTC) 1668:18:22, 3 May 2007 (UTC) 1249:prior to reading up on 1102:18:34, 3 May 2007 (UTC) 626:This has been added by 599:Names of God in Judaism 510:15:17, 4 May 2007 (UTC) 335:Primary Goal Discussion 1190:. "Art" is linked to 461:Rules for submission: 364:and related articles. 215: 70:avoid personal attacks 1748:Illegitimate symbol: 1263:Template:Christianity 1200:Template:Christianity 1174:, "God" is linked to 1049:I'm very disappointed 682:Complete Jewish Bible 214: 201:Christianity articles 1739:http://www.umjc.net/ 1687:Sounds ok with me.-- 1508:conflict of interest 311:bringing it up in a 1743:http://www.imja.com 1735:http://www.bmja.net 1731:http://www.mjaa.org 1111:This template adds 950:decided to go with 538:from previous TFD) 170:Christianity portal 1636:protected template 674:Religious practice 216: 111:content assessment 81:dispute resolution 42: 1859: 1816: 1612: 1265:to link "God" to 1251:Messianic Judaism 1212:Messianic Judaism 1206:. What makes it 799: 768: 750: 749: 647:Messianic Judaism 642: 622:Possible template 439:Design Discussion 362:Messianic Judaism 237: 236: 233: 232: 229: 228: 91: 90: 61:Assume good faith 38: 25:Messianic Judaism 2054: 1849: 1806: 1755: 1608: 1547: 1542: 1537: 1532: 1495: 1490: 1485: 1480: 1309:WikiProject link 1284:Template:Judaism 1229: 1178:, not simply to 789: 758: 741: 734: 727: 659: 636: 633: 504: 498: 445:Template:Judaism 203: 202: 199: 196: 193: 172: 167: 166: 156: 149: 148: 143: 132: 125: 102: 101: 100: 93: 16: 2062: 2061: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2012: 2011: 1996: 1858: 1815: 1717: 1703:discussion page 1675: 1661: 1632: 1545: 1540: 1535: 1530: 1493: 1488: 1483: 1478: 1400: 1370: 1311: 1227: 1220:supersessionism 1184:Islamic studies 1109: 1094: 1051: 850: 798: 767: 746: 745: 650: 624: 619: 570:discussion here 558:discussion here 502: 496: 459: 441: 337: 332: 300: 274: 242: 200: 197: 194: 191: 190: 168: 161: 138: 87: 86: 56: 12: 11: 5: 2060: 2058: 2050: 2049: 2044: 2039: 2034: 2029: 2024: 2014: 2013: 1995: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1851: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1821: 1820: 1808: 1772: 1771: 1716: 1713: 1674: 1671: 1660: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1631: 1630:Requested edit 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1421: 1420: 1399: 1396: 1369: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1349: 1310: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1275:Jewish editors 1271: 1259:God the Father 1172:Template:Islam 1134: 1133: 1108: 1107:ToDo - sorting 1105: 1093: 1090: 1088: 1086: 1085: 1050: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 993: 992: 944: 943: 920: 919: 918: 917: 849: 844: 843: 842: 841: 840: 817: 816: 815: 814: 805: 804: 803: 791: 760: 748: 747: 744: 743: 736: 729: 721: 720: 717: 716: 706: 705: 700: 696: 690:Jews for Jesus 688: 684: 680: 676: 661: 660: 652: 651: 644: 643: 641:of articles on 623: 620: 618: 615: 534:(see archived 525: 523: 522: 512: 505:to the top! ⇔ 487: 473: 472: 469: 466: 458: 455: 440: 437: 421: 404: 388: 336: 333: 331: 328: 299: 296: 294: 273: 270: 268: 262: 261: 257: 253: 250: 241: 238: 235: 234: 231: 230: 227: 226: 217: 207: 206: 204: 187:the discussion 174: 173: 157: 145: 144: 133: 121: 120: 114: 103: 89: 88: 85: 84: 77: 72: 63: 57: 55: 54: 43: 34: 33: 30: 29: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2059: 2048: 2045: 2043: 2040: 2038: 2035: 2033: 2030: 2028: 2025: 2023: 2020: 2019: 2017: 2010: 2009: 2005: 2001: 1994:Naming Change 1993: 1977: 1974: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1943: 1940: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1913: 1910: 1906: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1883: 1880: 1879:Humus sapiens 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1862: 1857: 1854: 1848: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1833: 1830: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1819: 1814: 1811: 1805: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1794: 1790: 1784: 1782: 1778: 1770: 1767: 1766:Humus sapiens 1763: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1754: 1749: 1746: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1726: 1725: 1722: 1721:Humus sapiens 1714: 1712: 1711: 1708: 1704: 1698: 1697: 1694: 1690: 1685: 1684: 1681: 1680:ChristTrekker 1672: 1670: 1669: 1666: 1658: 1654: 1651: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1641: 1637: 1629: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1568: 1551: 1548: 1543: 1538: 1533: 1528:comparable.-- 1526: 1525: 1524: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1512:point-of-view 1510:but may be a 1509: 1505: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1496: 1491: 1486: 1481: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1449: 1446: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1432: 1429: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1419: 1416: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1405: 1397: 1395: 1394: 1391: 1390:ChristTrekker 1387: 1386:understanding 1382: 1378: 1374: 1361: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1348: 1345: 1344:ChristTrekker 1340: 1339: 1338: 1335: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1308: 1300: 1297: 1296:ChristTrekker 1293: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1235: 1233: 1230: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1163: 1162:ChristTrekker 1159: 1154: 1150: 1149:content alone 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1140: 1132: 1129: 1128:ChristTrekker 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1119: 1118:ChristTrekker 1114: 1106: 1104: 1103: 1100: 1092:Code Clean Up 1091: 1089: 1084: 1081: 1080:ChristTrekker 1077: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1066: 1060: 1059: 1056: 1044: 1041: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1030: 1029:ChristTrekker 1026: 1015: 1012: 1011:ChristTrekker 1007: 1006: 1005: 1002: 997: 996: 995: 994: 991: 988: 987:ChristTrekker 984: 980: 976: 975: 974: 973: 970: 966: 961: 960: 957: 956:ChristTrekker 953: 949: 942: 939: 938:ChristTrekker 935: 931: 930: 929: 928: 925: 916: 913: 912:ChristTrekker 909: 908: 907: 904: 899: 898: 897: 896: 893: 892:ChristTrekker 889: 885: 880: 876: 874: 870: 866: 862: 857: 855: 848: 845: 839: 836: 831: 830: 829: 828: 827: 826: 823: 813: 810: 806: 802: 797: 794: 788: 783: 782: 781: 778: 773: 772: 771: 766: 763: 757: 752: 751: 742: 737: 735: 730: 728: 723: 722: 719: 718: 715: 714: 713: 708: 707: 704: 703: 699: 695: 691: 687: 683: 679: 675: 671: 667: 663: 662: 658: 654: 653: 649: 648: 640: 634: 631: 629: 621: 617:Template Talk 616: 614: 613: 610: 606: 603: 600: 596: 591: 590: 585: 583: 579: 578: 573: 571: 568:*See current 567: 566: 561: 559: 556:*See current 555: 554: 549: 547: 543: 539: 537: 532: 529: 528: 521: 518: 513: 511: 508: 507:ChristTrekker 501: 494: 493: 488: 486: 483: 478: 477: 476: 470: 467: 464: 463: 462: 456: 454: 453: 450: 446: 438: 436: 435: 432: 427: 426: 419: 418: 415: 410: 409: 402: 401: 398: 393: 392: 386: 385: 382: 377: 376: 371: 370: 367: 363: 359: 355: 351: 347: 343: 334: 329: 327: 326: 323: 319: 316: 314: 309: 305: 297: 295: 292: 290: 287: 283: 277: 272:Template Type 271: 269: 266: 258: 254: 251: 248: 247: 246: 240:Primary Goals 239: 224: 223: 213: 209: 208: 205: 188: 184: 180: 179: 171: 165: 160: 158: 155: 151: 150: 146: 142: 137: 134: 131: 127: 122: 118: 112: 108: 104: 95: 94: 82: 78: 76: 73: 71: 67: 64: 62: 59: 58: 52: 48: 47:Learn to edit 44: 41: 36: 35: 32: 31: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1997: 1785: 1773: 1750: 1747: 1727: 1718: 1702: 1699: 1686: 1676: 1662: 1633: 1597: 1584: 1564: 1503: 1465: 1401: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1371: 1312: 1291: 1287: 1254: 1242: 1215: 1207: 1203: 1176:God in Islam 1157: 1152: 1148: 1135: 1110: 1095: 1087: 1075: 1061: 1052: 1024: 1022: 962: 945: 933: 921: 883: 881: 877: 872: 868: 864: 858: 853: 851: 818: 731: 710: 709: 664: 645: 625: 587: 586: 575: 574: 563: 562: 551: 550: 541: 540: 533: 530: 526: 524: 491: 490: 474: 460: 442: 428: 423: 420: 411: 406: 403: 394: 390: 387: 378: 374: 372: 346:Christianity 338: 320: 317: 301: 293: 278: 275: 267: 263: 243: 220: 192:Christianity 183:Christianity 176: 136:Christianity 117:WikiProjects 106: 19:This is the 1973:Kakdela2118 1909:Kakdela2118 1222:at worst. 1192:Islamic art 1153:combination 936:version. ⇔ 628:user:Ju98 5 527:SUBMISSIONS 500:archive box 330:Discussions 2016:Categories 1413:be shown. 979:MaozIsrael 694:MaozIsrael 637:Part of a 1939:inigmatus 1829:inigmatus 1793:inigmatus 1707:inigmatus 1204:messianic 1194:, not to 1188:Academics 1186:, not to 1099:inigmatus 1065:inigmatus 1040:inigmatus 1001:inigmatus 963:I prefer 948:Inigmatus 924:inigmatus 835:inigmatus 809:inigmatus 609:inigmatus 517:inigmatus 482:inigmatus 449:inigmatus 431:inigmatus 414:inigmatus 397:inigmatus 381:inigmatus 366:inigmatus 358:Mormonism 322:inigmatus 83:if needed 66:Be polite 27:template. 21:talk page 2000:Lonnyron 1589:Noogster 1466:relevant 1445:Noogster 1415:Noogster 1398:Template 1334:Noogster 1055:Noogster 884:had been 670:Theology 350:Hinduism 107:template 51:get help 1606:Amarkov 1567:Dweller 1404:Dweller 1247:Judaism 1216:Judaism 1208:Judaism 1076:so hard 999:design. 865:However 408:article 354:Judaism 256:article 1847:Daniel 1804:Daniel 1715:Symbol 1659:Talmud 1583:Wait, 1470:WP:COI 1357:mattbr 1323:mattbr 1315:WP:ASR 1139:Jayjg 1025:nowiki 965:Ju98 5 952:Ju98 5 861:Tallit 822:Jayjg 787:Daniel 756:Daniel 712:Portal 666:Yeshua 639:series 577:Talmud 565:Tanakh 492:please 313:WP:TfD 308:WP:TfD 304:WP:TfD 289:WP:TfD 286:WP:POV 282:WP:NOT 141:Jewish 113:scale. 1777:WP:OR 1762:WP:OR 1689:Kirby 1531:Ķĩřβȳ 1506:be a 1479:Ķĩřβȳ 888:there 553:Torah 342:Islam 105:This 79:Seek 2004:talk 1693:time 1610:moo! 1602:true 1585:WHAT 1541:Ťįɱé 1489:Ťįɱé 1474:this 1381:only 1243:know 981:and 873:then 495:add 68:and 1764:. ← 1665:Avi 1650:Avi 1640:Qxz 1520:Avi 1504:not 1428:Avi 1377:not 1267:God 1224:Tom 1198:. 1196:Art 1180:God 969:Avi 903:Avi 777:Avi 589:God 422:4. 405:3. 389:2. 373:1. 284:or 2018:: 2006:) 1598:is 1355:. 1321:. 1292:If 1288:If 934:my 882:I 869:if 692:· 672:· 668:· 607:. 604:, 601:. 584:. 572:. 560:. 548:. 503:}} 497:{{ 356:, 352:, 348:, 344:, 315:. 291:. 139:: 49:; 2002:( 1856:+ 1853:T 1850:/ 1813:+ 1810:T 1807:/ 1729:( 1691:♥ 1546:Ø 1536:♥ 1494:Ø 1484:♥ 1232:r 1228:e 796:+ 793:T 790:/ 765:+ 762:T 759:/ 740:e 733:t 726:v 582:1 546:1 225:. 119:: 53:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index