Knowledge (XXG)

Template talk:Navbox musical artist

Source đź“ť

1331: 1266: 436: 367: 276: 596:
navbox just about their no longer existent music careers seems bizarre to me. And yes, actor navboxes could be messy, but if created, we could have maybe like a three starring role rule - only the three main stars of the film's navbox can be used in the article. Thoughts? I think this is long overdue. —
825:
I agree, navigation templates are for navigating between existing Knowledge (XXG) aritcles, and therefore redirects should not be used, especially where one link redirects to an article already linked in the same template. I'm often removing plain text from navigation templates but don't always check
1620:
In short, we should make it clear that associated acts should be nav boxes. Record labels that the band has released albums on should not appear in navigation templates. The exceptions to this should be few and far between, such as when you cannot think of one without the other. Otherwise, only list
1649:
Sorry. I was having a bad day yesterday. Agree that labels (unless founded and maintained by the whole band) should not be listed. Associated bands are probably not best listed in the nav. Part of the rationale is that the nav template can appear on more articles that do not have the band's infobox
1664:
Don't worry, we can't be our best everyday, can we? As for the acts, I don't see them as distractions, honestly. I believe a casual reader would expect to see Alter Bridge at the Creed navbox, or at least wouldn't find it strange to see it there. Unfortunately nobody else is commenting so we can't
1518:
Since navigation templates serve a different purpose from infoboxes, I don't think associated acts should be listed at all unless there is an even deeper association than that needed for the infobox. We only list labels that the band itself started, and that is a different criteria than what is in
595:
I kind of agree with what you are saying, in a way, but I think that as long as only starring roles are mentioned in the infobox, it should be okay. Personally, I think a navbox should be created for actors. For example, artists like Hilary and Lindsay are pretty much done with music, so to have a
1099:
Definitely. The way I read that, it implies that the red links should only be added if the articles are likely to be created and kept. In musical artist navboxes, I generally find that redlinks are from articles on minor releases that were deleted, or have been there forever and the articles are
1084:
This seems to condone the use of navigation templates as mini-discographies as long as unlinked text is simply red linked. I think Template:Navbox musical artist should opt out of this exception. For many musicians with large catalogues, this would result in ridiculously oversized navboxes that
879:
One of the problems I frequently run into with musical artist navboxes is that they're often treated as little discographies, with editors cramming in every release by an artist—EPs, singles, obscure releases, etc.—regardless of whether there are articles about those topics to link to. Thus the
561:
are just a few singers that also have few or more acting credits under their belts. Listing every film and TV show that they have done is superfluous, the more their careers continue the more acting work they are going to do. The Navbox musical artist template is exactly that a template for the
807:
I think Knowledge (XXG) should have a policy on whether or not this should occur because, theoretically, any single given release could be included in a navbox as long as it is linked to another article. I personally think all subjects without their own article – with the possible exception of
1074:
Red links can be retained in navigation templates that represent a well-defined and complete set of data (geographic divisions, annual events, filmographies, etc.), where deleting red links would leave an incomplete and misleading result. Even then, editors are encouraged to
1232:
Navboxes should not be used for this purpose. Navboxes facilitate navigation, i.e., contain links to articles directly relating to the subject. Other artists who recorded the subject's songs are peripheral or only loosely related to the subject. If the covers meet
562:
person as a musical artist NOT as an actor. Adding the person's name and a hashtag linking to the filmography section in the person's page (like this Person#Filmography) should suffice linking it from the template. But anyway, what are your opinions?
1576:"grouping of links used in multiple related articles to facilitate navigation between those articles". "The goal is not to cram as many related articles as possible into one space." "Navigation templates provide navigation between related articles". 1635:
Relax, I was just trying to understand your reasoning, but in the end it seems we are on the same page anyway. And I agree listing labels in navboxes would be pointless, indeed, unless there's a connection significantly deeper than a mere contract.
544:
Wow this talk page hasn't been edited in a while, anyway I wanted to start this discussion on what other people's opinions are on having films/TV series listed in the musical artist template. I for one find it very unnecessary considering acts like
1156:. I think it is hard to apply this to the musical artist navbox because not all albums/songs are notable enough for a standalone article. For example, if a song/album article is deleted, it makes no sense for it to be in the template as a redlink. 630:
The only time I feel that a film or TV show should be listed in the template is if the artist was active with the project as lead actor and executive producer, etc, not just appearing in the film. For example, it should not be a problem if
767:
It may just have been too big a table. I was able to compress some information to bring the # of sections in the template to under 20 (although if DM keep releasing albums, we'll hit the limit again soon enough). Thanks for your reply.
977:"In navigation boxes about musical ensembles, it may be appropriate to list all of the members of the ensemble, to avoid the perception that the ensemble is a solo act, provided that at least one member of the ensemble is notable." 1100:
unlikely to ever be created (and likely wouldn't meet the notability threshold). As you say, the full discography of an artist should either be in the article about the artist or in a separate discography article, if warranted. --
1117:
is an example of a navbox with about 1/3 redlinks. The red links were added to previously unlinked text, with the edit summary "Red links are now acceptable per a change to the guidelines. unlinked text is
324:
tags weren't supposed to be included, and bodyclass and titleclass are supposed to be parameters in the Navbox template. By the way, I'm in favor of this edit, if we're still trying to build a consensus.
808:
subjects which have their own individual sub-sections in another existing article – should not be included in a navbox, and that the Discography link in the 'Related articles' section should suffice.
953:
I doubt such a notice would solve the problem, but it might help a bit. At the least it might help inexperienced editors get to know the purpose and function of navboxes a little better. Thoughts? --
1426: 1402: 1398: 1085:
would not provide the intended benefit. An artist's discography is just a click away and provides dates and other details that make some sense out of a shopping list of titles. Thoughts? —
1050:
anything that reduces navbox clutter. As for listing red-linked band members: only if at least 2 are blue-linked; otherwise all should be omitted as there's no navigational benefit. --
728:
won't display. I don't see anything in the documentation for this template to indicate a limit, and the template appears to be formed properly. Any idea why section 21 isn't appearing?
941: 905: 513:"Please discuss major changes on the talk page before making them." Does it mean: "Please discuss major changes on the talk page before editing the template." Just a quick comment, 39: 895:
My suggestion is to add a notice that would automatically appear at the top of the editing page when one tries to edit a musical artist navbox. Similar to the notice that
1241:
beyond the fact that they exist?), the details may be added to the article about the song. If there is no song article, it (and any covers) are probably not notable.—
1650:
and so associated acts don't make much sense in that context and may become a distraction. Thanks for not laying into me for yesterday's over-the-top response.
98: 74: 1204:
I wanted to add a few cover songs done of PM Dawn tracks. Is there an appropriate place to include this; in the navbox musical artist template or otherwise?
692:
questioning why one template listing an artist's singles and one showing the artist's songs should be displayed differently (in terms of background color). --
1456:. List 21 doesn't display. The only alternative I can see is to move some into sublists, like albums, but I've never done this. Any other option? Thanks. 1617:
Have you given up on wanting to know what the goal of a navbox is? Either carry on a discussion or don't, but I'm not following your bunny trails around.
1533:
The infobox criteria seems restrictive enough, but I hope we all agree at least that spin-offs and/or groups with several members in common are a must.
80: 1475:
I just had someone revert the removal of an "associated act" in a nav box despite there being only a tangential association, and there being no
790:
I am aware it is currently the case that some navboxes are including music releases – e.g. singles – that don't have their own articles. Take
1497:, speaking specifically about musical navboxes, for the sake of consistency, I suggest we apply to them the same reasoning we already do to 1022: 743:
It isn't in the documentation but there is a limit. I tested it using the standard navbox template and I was able to add a 21st section. --
688:
Basically because they present the same thing (an artist's songs with their own articles listed in a navbox), I've started a discussion at
464: 454: 1153: 1076: 1479:
link. I have seen people removing these for a few years and yet there are plenty that get added as well. What formal advice can we give?
406: 355: 242: 182: 1345: 884:, and such. I usually remove these with an explanation such as "this is an article navigation template, not a discography" (example: 945: 921: 913: 20: 1546:
But the infobox is a different criteria and has a completely different goal, and no spin-off groups with are a must in a navbox.
1339: 1573: 1300:| group4 = ] should be | group4 = Films | group5 = ] should be | group5 = Related articles *] should be removed 69: 1498: 1220: 300: 160: 1171: 892:). But the problem is pervasive and persistent. I'm sure anyone who works with these navboxes with any regularity can relate. 669:
Was there a change to this template recently that caused the separators between the album/song titles to disappear? Thanks!
24: 794:, for instance: several of the singles, EPs and albums link to articles that are not specifically about that subject – e.g. 60: 854: 725: 475: 1238: 1360: 1069:– I just re-read WP:EXISTING after linking it in an edit summary and was surprised to find this addition from June 2015: 606: 836: 264: 1655: 1626: 1581: 1551: 1524: 1484: 1055: 93: 1502: 1272: 1476: 1348:. Use the 'edit' link at the top of the green "Template documentation" box to edit the documentation subpage. — 1344:
is usually not required for edits to the documentation, categories, or interlanguage links of templates using a
635:
is listed in the Miley Cyrus template because naturally the show launched her career, same with Hilary Duff and
107: 1453: 1436: 1413: 1378: 1317: 908:, a grouping of links used in multiple related articles to facilitate navigation between those articles. It is 865: 471: 979:
This is something I strongly agree with and would like to see incorporated in a possible notice if possible.
815: 623: 402: 351: 238: 178: 1501:. This should be made more clear at this very template, which uses an example that apparently violates the 1208: 933: 689: 1651: 1622: 1577: 1547: 1520: 1494: 1480: 831: 445: 129: 1234: 1216: 50: 1726: 1114: 1051: 497: 1135:
I'm curious who made that change to EXISTING and if there was any discussion behind it. Do you know? --
972: 929: 65: 791: 674: 588: 520: 1431: 1408: 1373: 1312: 1140: 1105: 958: 861: 800: 1461: 1161: 1007: 810: 646: 617: 569: 531: 393: 342: 330: 229: 169: 112: 880:
navbox winds up with a lot of redlinks, unlinked text, song titles that pipe to album articles,
546: 1666: 1637: 1605: 1561: 1534: 1506: 1246: 1179: 1126: 1121:. I doubt this result was contemplated when the new(er) exception to WP:EXISTING was added. — 1090: 1038: 984: 554: 288: 46: 1736: 1713: 1673: 1659: 1644: 1630: 1612: 1585: 1568: 1555: 1541: 1528: 1513: 1488: 1465: 1442: 1419: 1384: 1365: 1354: 1323: 1250: 1224: 1183: 1165: 1144: 1130: 1109: 1094: 1059: 1042: 1011: 988: 962: 869: 842: 819: 777: 762: 737: 711: 678: 652: 625: 610: 590: 575: 534: 502: 489: 479: 410: 385: 359: 334: 318: 268: 246: 221: 204: 186: 109: 1712:. On that basis, can we please remove the functionality for "autocollapse" as an option? ≫ 1294: 937: 881: 827: 527: 485: 773: 733: 670: 582: 514: 260: 111: 1427:
Knowledge (XXG):Templates for discussion/Log/2017 November 14#Template:Selena Gomez songs
1403:
Knowledge (XXG):Templates for discussion/Log/2017 November 13#Template:Taylor Swift songs
141:|bodyclass = vcard |titleclass= {{Infobox musical artist/hCard class|{{{background|}}}}} 1598: 1399:
Knowledge (XXG):Templates for discussion/Log/2017 November 13#Template:Katy Perry songs
1212: 1149: 1136: 1101: 954: 912:
a discography for the musical artist, nor a general listing of topics related to them.
615:
I think the current situation is ok. Major billed roles should be listed only, though.
375: 308: 216: 199: 1293:
Please could someone edit the Led Zeppelin examples, to remove the following category
1710:
Collapsible templates should not conceal article content by default upon page loading
1457: 1157: 1003: 641: 564: 558: 326: 998:. I run into this a lot and think an editing notice is a great idea. I also support 1705: 1591: 1242: 1175: 1122: 1086: 1034: 999: 980: 722: 292: 284: 283:
It caused massive page corruptions with articles that have other templates. Namely
1200:
Appropriate place to cite those who did covers of songs by the artist of interest?
1349: 597: 550: 769: 729: 252: 1303:
I also think the following is problematic, and the image should be removed:
853:
Hi Wiki collegues, Please reduce the limit of entries of the Navbox so that
212: 195: 295:
if you want to see, drop me note. I think it's the used of <code: -->
323:
Yeah, I think you misunderstood the edit request. The <code: -->
135: 932:(unless the red linked article is very likely to be created), or 1260: 113: 15: 1621:
existing works, and their release years are always optional.
942:
Knowledge (XXG):Categories, lists, and navigation templates
1708:
has very clear guidance for collapsing in tables. It says
936:
from song titles to album articles (these are considered
291:
seen to be damaged. I have a html file of the corrupted
971:– I frequently perform the same tireless edits and link 1119: 896: 889: 885: 1170:
Since so many articles are deleted, perhaps meeting
1704:I don't know if this has been discussed before but 1499:Template:Infobox musical artist#associated_acts 1072: 902: 1471:Should we spell-out BIDIRECTIONAL more clearly 786:Linking to subjects without their own articles 717:Is there a limit of 20 entries in this navbox? 975:in my edit summary. At WP:EXISTING, it says, 899:when one goes to edit a BLP. Something like: 192:Is there consensus for this change? — Martin 138:microformat by including the following code: 8: 1174:for all navbox entries should be required. — 1152:: It looks like the decision was made here: 897:automatically appears at the top of the page 156:for groups; and is based on the code use in 540:Films/TV shows being listed in the template 209:Disabled request, as no response. — Martin 1393:Best practice for musical artist navboxes 1033:, and ALL CAPS) or it might be missed. — 914:Navigation templates provide navigation 1665:say what the community thinks of that. 1154:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Red link/Archive 4 1709: 145: 7: 1700:Getting rid of state / auto collapse 1237:(essentially, are they discussed by 946:Knowledge (XXG):Navigation templates 940:). For more information, please see 1574:Knowledge (XXG):Navigation template 1257:Easter eggs in Led Zeppelin example 928:. Please do not add unlinked text, 23:for discussing improvements to the 390:And working perfectly. Thank you. 14: 45:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 1397:Would anyone like to comment at 1329: 1264: 969:Support + possible wording tweak 434: 365: 274: 40:Click here to start a new topic. 684:Navboxes for songs and singles 653:18:18, 10 September 2011 (UTC) 626:17:42, 10 September 2011 (UTC) 611:17:39, 10 September 2011 (UTC) 591:16:49, 10 September 2011 (UTC) 576:07:13, 10 September 2011 (UTC) 1: 1560:What's the goal of a navbox? 1443:15:17, 14 November 2017 (UTC) 1420:09:50, 14 November 2017 (UTC) 1385:09:49, 14 November 2017 (UTC) 1366:05:01, 14 November 2017 (UTC) 1324:15:04, 13 November 2017 (UTC) 1306:*] ('']'') should be * '']'' 922:should only contain links to 855:Template:Eric Clapton singles 778:22:21, 18 November 2013 (UTC) 763:20:19, 18 November 2013 (UTC) 738:17:53, 15 November 2013 (UTC) 679:00:24, 21 December 2012 (UTC) 37:Put new text under old text. 1021:– Good idea, but prefer the 535:11:59, 14 October 2010 (UTC) 1287:to reactivate your request. 1275:has been answered. Set the 465:Navbox musical artist/color 455:Navbox Musical artist/color 1752: 1674:14:51, 26 April 2021 (UTC) 1660:18:16, 20 April 2021 (UTC) 1645:17:53, 20 April 2021 (UTC) 1631:23:47, 19 April 2021 (UTC) 1613:14:05, 19 April 2021 (UTC) 1586:05:06, 19 April 2021 (UTC) 1569:17:33, 18 April 2021 (UTC) 1556:00:02, 17 April 2021 (UTC) 1542:18:52, 16 April 2021 (UTC) 1529:21:17, 15 April 2021 (UTC) 1514:21:14, 15 April 2021 (UTC) 1489:01:35, 13 April 2021 (UTC) 1466:14:35, 11 March 2019 (UTC) 1184:19:12, 26 April 2016 (UTC) 1166:01:37, 26 April 2016 (UTC) 1145:21:11, 25 April 2016 (UTC) 1131:19:47, 25 April 2016 (UTC) 1110:18:15, 25 April 2016 (UTC) 1095:14:44, 25 April 2016 (UTC) 1060:01:59, 25 April 2016 (UTC) 1043:20:58, 24 April 2016 (UTC) 1012:20:47, 24 April 2016 (UTC) 989:20:34, 24 April 2016 (UTC) 963:19:29, 24 April 2016 (UTC) 904:This is a Knowledge (XXG) 432: 247:23:41, 30 April 2010 (UTC) 222:23:17, 30 April 2010 (UTC) 205:09:05, 30 April 2010 (UTC) 187:21:53, 29 April 2010 (UTC) 1737:20:42, 17 June 2022 (UTC) 1594:interfering with that on 1590:And how is, for example, 1251:17:36, 19 June 2016 (UTC) 1225:03:35, 19 June 2016 (UTC) 870:10:10, 30 July 2015 (UTC) 499:Penny for your thoughts? 480:20:14, 30 June 2010 (UTC) 306:does not use that format 144:The latter line sets the 75:Be welcoming to newcomers 1454:Template:Michael Jackson 926:Knowledge (XXG) articles 849:Pleaser reduce the limit 843:09:18, 5 June 2015 (UTC) 820:00:31, 5 June 2015 (UTC) 721:The 21st section of the 712:17:10, 10 May 2013 (UTC) 665:Change to this template? 503:09:49, 1 July 2010 (UTC) 450:Could the redirect from 1449:need more than 20 lists 1370:Ah, thanks! Updated! 1340:edit template-protected 1077:write the article first 1002:'s suggested addition. 581:I completely agree. -- 411:23:52, 7 May 2010 (UTC) 386:20:30, 7 May 2010 (UTC) 360:10:09, 7 May 2010 (UTC) 335:00:23, 7 May 2010 (UTC) 319:19:22, 6 May 2010 (UTC) 269:21:47, 2 May 2010 (UTC) 251:Because he says so :/ — 1297:and overlinked items: 1081: 950: 875:Add an editing notice? 509:Intro in documentation 301:Infobox musical artist 161:Infobox musical artist 70:avoid personal attacks 1346:documentation subpage 1172:WP:Notability (music) 1115:Template:Hoodoo Gurus 726:navbox for DM singles 339:CapitalR is correct. 123:Add hCard microformat 25:Navbox musical artist 792:Template:The Prodigy 152:for individuals and 1239:WP:Reliable sources 906:navigation template 801:The Fat of the Land 619:I Help, When I Can. 472:The Evil IP address 429:Redirect correction 826:for redirects or " 81:dispute resolution 42: 1735: 1364: 1291: 1290: 1228: 1211:comment added by 555:Justin Timberlake 524: 518: 488:comes to mind... 289:Christopher Guest 220: 203: 120: 119: 61:Assume good faith 38: 1743: 1734: 1731: 1723: 1720: 1717: 1671: 1642: 1610: 1603: 1597: 1566: 1539: 1511: 1503:WP:BIDIRECTIONAL 1477:WP:BIDIRECTIONal 1439: 1434: 1416: 1411: 1381: 1376: 1352: 1343: 1333: 1332: 1320: 1315: 1282: 1278: 1268: 1267: 1261: 1227: 1205: 1052:Michael Bednarek 1025:approach (& 938:easter egg links 882:easter egg links 839: 834: 761: 758: 755: 752: 749: 746: 710: 707: 704: 701: 698: 695: 649: 644: 602: 572: 567: 522: 516: 500: 494: 469: 463: 459: 453: 449: 438: 437: 409: 400: 396: 382: 380: 373: 369: 368: 358: 349: 345: 315: 313: 305: 299: 282: 278: 277: 256: 245: 236: 232: 210: 193: 185: 176: 172: 165: 159: 155: 151: 147: 133: 114: 16: 1751: 1750: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1727: 1724: 1718: 1715: 1702: 1667: 1638: 1606: 1601: 1595: 1562: 1535: 1507: 1473: 1451: 1437: 1432: 1414: 1409: 1395: 1379: 1374: 1337: 1330: 1318: 1313: 1307: 1301: 1280: 1276: 1265: 1259: 1206: 1202: 951: 918:Knowledge (XXG) 877: 851: 837: 832: 788: 759: 756: 753: 750: 747: 744: 719: 708: 705: 702: 699: 696: 693: 686: 667: 647: 642: 609: 598: 570: 565: 542: 530: 511: 498: 490: 467: 461: 460:be bypassed to 457: 451: 443: 441: 440: 435: 431: 398: 392: 391: 378: 376: 366: 364: 347: 341: 340: 311: 309: 303: 297: 275: 273: 254: 234: 228: 227: 174: 168: 167: 163: 157: 153: 149: 142: 127: 125: 116: 115: 110: 87: 86: 56: 12: 11: 5: 1749: 1747: 1701: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1652:Walter Görlitz 1623:Walter Görlitz 1618: 1578:Walter Görlitz 1548:Walter Görlitz 1521:Walter Görlitz 1495:Walter Görlitz 1481:Walter Görlitz 1472: 1469: 1450: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1394: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1305: 1299: 1289: 1288: 1269: 1258: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1201: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1071: 1070: 1063: 1062: 1045: 1015: 1014: 992: 991: 901: 876: 873: 862:Matthiasberoli 850: 847: 846: 845: 787: 784: 783: 782: 781: 780: 718: 715: 685: 682: 666: 663: 662: 661: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 655: 637:Lizzie McGuire 633:Hannah Montana 605: 541: 538: 526: 510: 507: 506: 505: 433: 430: 427: 426: 425: 424: 423: 422: 421: 420: 419: 418: 417: 416: 415: 414: 413: 337: 224: 140: 134:Please add an 124: 121: 118: 117: 108: 106: 105: 102: 101: 89: 88: 85: 84: 77: 72: 63: 57: 55: 54: 43: 34: 33: 30: 29: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1748: 1739: 1738: 1732: 1730: 1722: 1721: 1711: 1707: 1699: 1675: 1672: 1670: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1643: 1641: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1619: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1611: 1609: 1600: 1593: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1567: 1565: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1540: 1538: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1519:the infobox. 1517: 1516: 1515: 1512: 1510: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1470: 1468: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1448: 1444: 1441: 1440: 1435: 1428: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1418: 1417: 1412: 1404: 1400: 1392: 1386: 1383: 1382: 1377: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1362: 1359: 1356: 1351: 1347: 1341: 1336: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1322: 1321: 1316: 1304: 1298: 1296: 1286: 1283:parameter to 1274: 1270: 1263: 1262: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1199: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1083: 1082: 1080: 1078: 1068: 1065: 1064: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1046: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1017: 1016: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 994: 993: 990: 986: 982: 978: 974: 970: 967: 966: 965: 964: 960: 956: 949: 947: 943: 939: 935: 931: 927: 925: 919: 917: 911: 907: 900: 898: 893: 891: 887: 883: 874: 872: 871: 867: 863: 858: 856: 848: 844: 840: 835: 829: 824: 823: 822: 821: 817: 813: 812: 811:Lachlan Foley 805: 803: 802: 797: 796:The Added Fat 793: 785: 779: 775: 771: 766: 765: 764: 742: 741: 740: 739: 735: 731: 727: 724: 716: 714: 713: 691: 683: 681: 680: 676: 672: 664: 654: 651: 650: 645: 638: 634: 629: 628: 627: 624: 622: 621: 620: 614: 613: 612: 608: 603: 601: 594: 593: 592: 589: 586: 585: 580: 579: 578: 577: 574: 573: 568: 560: 559:Lindsay Lohan 556: 552: 548: 539: 537: 536: 533: 529: 525: 519: 508: 504: 501: 495: 493: 487: 484: 483: 482: 481: 477: 473: 466: 456: 447: 446:editprotected 428: 412: 408: 404: 399:Pigsonthewing 395: 389: 388: 387: 384: 383: 372: 363: 362: 361: 357: 353: 348:Pigsonthewing 344: 338: 336: 332: 328: 322: 321: 320: 317: 316: 302: 294: 290: 286: 281: 272: 271: 270: 266: 262: 258: 250: 249: 248: 244: 240: 235:Pigsonthewing 231: 225: 223: 218: 214: 208: 207: 206: 201: 197: 191: 190: 189: 188: 184: 180: 175:Pigsonthewing 171: 162: 139: 137: 131: 130:editprotected 122: 104: 103: 100: 97: 95: 91: 90: 82: 78: 76: 73: 71: 67: 64: 62: 59: 58: 52: 48: 47:Learn to edit 44: 41: 36: 35: 32: 31: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1728: 1714: 1706:MOS:COLLAPSE 1703: 1669:Victor Lopes 1668: 1640:Victor Lopes 1639: 1608:Victor Lopes 1607: 1592:Alter Bridge 1564:Victor Lopes 1563: 1537:Victor Lopes 1536: 1509:Victor Lopes 1508: 1474: 1452: 1429: 1406: 1396: 1371: 1357: 1334: 1310: 1308: 1302: 1292: 1284: 1273:edit request 1235:WP:SONGCOVER 1207:— Preceding 1203: 1073: 1066: 1047: 1030: 1026: 1018: 995: 976: 968: 952: 923: 915: 909: 903: 894: 878: 859: 852: 809: 806: 799: 798:EP links to 795: 789: 723:Depeche Mode 720: 687: 668: 640: 636: 632: 618: 616: 599: 583: 563: 543: 512: 491: 470:? Thanks, -- 442: 407:Andy's edits 394:Andy Mabbett 374: 370: 356:Andy's edits 343:Andy Mabbett 307: 293:Dolly Parton 285:Dolly Parton 279: 243:Andy's edits 230:Andy Mabbett 183:Andy's edits 170:Andy Mabbett 146:|titleclass= 143: 126: 92: 19:This is the 1505:guideline. 1031:underscored 973:WP:EXISTING 934:piped links 828:Easter eggs 551:Hilary Duff 492:HJ Mitchell 403:Andy's talk 352:Andy's talk 239:Andy's talk 179:Andy's talk 1277:|answered= 857:can work. 838:projectors 671:GoingBatty 584:ipodnano05 1335:Not done: 1309:Thanks! 1213:Sberke206 1150:IllaZilla 1137:IllaZilla 1102:IllaZilla 955:IllaZilla 930:red links 860:Thanks -- 83:if needed 66:Be polite 27:template. 21:talk page 1458:deisenbe 1438:superman 1415:superman 1380:superman 1319:superman 1221:contribs 1209:unsigned 1158:Random86 1004:Random86 924:existing 690:WT:SONGS 607:contribs 439:Resolved 327:CapitalR 280:Not done 265:contribs 94:Archives 51:get help 1719:Unique1 1295:WP:EGGs 1243:Ojorojo 1176:Ojorojo 1123:Ojorojo 1087:Ojorojo 1067:Comment 1048:Support 1035:Ojorojo 1019:Support 1000:Fezmar9 996:Support 981:Fezmar9 833:anemone 547:Beyoncé 1433:wooden 1410:wooden 1375:wooden 1350:JJMC89 1314:wooden 916:within 886:before 748:cheers 697:cheers 600:Status 528:WP:MSE 523:HENRUI 486:WP:R2D 397:(User: 381:jones 346:(User: 314:jones 233:(User: 173:(User: 154:fn org 1599:Creed 1425:Also 1281:|ans= 1271:This 1118:not". 890:after 770:87Fan 751:peaks 730:87Fan 700:peaks 643:Quasy 566:Quasy 226:Yes. 136:hCard 79:Seek 1729:Talk 1716:Lil- 1656:talk 1627:talk 1582:talk 1552:talk 1525:talk 1485:talk 1462:talk 1401:and 1247:talk 1217:talk 1180:talk 1162:talk 1141:talk 1127:talk 1106:talk 1091:talk 1056:talk 1039:talk 1027:bold 1023:KISS 1008:talk 985:talk 959:talk 944:and 920:and 888:and 866:talk 830:". – 816:talk 774:talk 760:wars 757:lost 754:news 745:Star 734:talk 709:wars 706:lost 703:news 694:Star 675:talk 476:talk 371:Done 331:talk 287:and 261:talk 217:talk 213:MSGJ 200:talk 196:MSGJ 68:and 1725:-{ 1405:? 1279:or 910:not 648:Boy 571:Boy 401:); 377:Ron 350:); 310:Ron 237:); 177:); 148:to 1733:}- 1658:) 1629:) 1604:? 1602:}} 1596:{{ 1584:) 1554:) 1527:) 1487:) 1464:) 1430:-- 1407:-- 1372:-- 1342:}} 1338:{{ 1311:-- 1285:no 1249:) 1223:) 1219:• 1182:) 1164:) 1143:) 1129:) 1108:) 1093:) 1058:) 1041:) 1029:, 1010:) 987:) 961:) 948:. 868:) 841:– 818:) 804:. 776:) 736:) 677:) 639:. 587:* 557:, 553:, 549:, 517:NG 496:| 478:) 468:}} 462:{{ 458:}} 452:{{ 448:}} 444:{{ 405:; 354:; 333:) 325:-- 304:}} 298:{{ 296:, 267:) 263:• 257:DJ 253:Th 241:; 215:· 198:· 181:; 166:. 164:}} 158:{{ 150:fn 132:}} 128:{{ 49:; 1654:( 1625:( 1580:( 1550:( 1523:( 1483:( 1460:( 1363:) 1361:C 1358:· 1355:T 1353:( 1245:( 1215:( 1178:( 1160:( 1139:( 1125:( 1104:( 1089:( 1079:. 1054:( 1037:( 1006:( 983:( 957:( 864:( 814:( 772:( 732:( 673:( 604:{ 532:♨ 521:C 515:A 474:( 379:h 329:( 312:h 259:( 255:e 219:) 211:( 202:) 194:( 99:1 96:: 53:.

Index

talk page
Navbox musical artist
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Archives
1
editprotected
hCard
Infobox musical artist
Andy Mabbett
Andy's talk
Andy's edits
21:53, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
MSGJ
talk
09:05, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
MSGJ
talk
23:17, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Andy Mabbett
Andy's talk
Andy's edits
23:41, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
TheDJ

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑