168:
99:
282:
264:
292:
797:. This is consonant with another recent discussion about making the colours used on Canadian legislative templates match (as closely as we can muster) the official colours used by the parties. PS: Just ensure that the readability problem reported in the thread above this one is resolved, which I think the proposed replacement template will already handle; just sandbox and test case before actual implementation.
216:
158:
236:
130:
451:
Currently the highlighted colours for the different senator affiliations are not distinct enough. Independent and
Conservative are almost indistinguishable as are Independent Liberal and Progressive Conservative. My attempt at a change may have been too stark but there needs to be some happy medium.
424:
Update: I've made a minor change to the template formatting; if we're using background colouring to denote party affiliations, then we don't also need a party abbreviation in brackets after each individual senator's name. This does bring the vertical size down somewhat, and makes the template look a
757:
I've started an RfC to publicize this discussion, build awareness, and establish consensus from editors who may or may not participate in the
Template namespace on a regular or quasi-regular basis. To non-involved closing RfC editor, when consensus is established, please close with the optional RfC
584:
I would argue the opposite, particularly as the Senate becomes more independent. The purpose of the Senate was to provide a house of "sober second thought", and achieve a balance of regional interests. Furthermore, a senator's affiliation may change, but the province they are appointed to represent
779:
added to this template's uniquely pale scheme, because lumping ISG, CSG and N/A under the same colour is inaccurate and misleading, as is keeping the PSG under the
Liberal colour (albeit less so). Of course, adopting the Canadian colours used elsewhere would solve this problem nicely. โ
547:. Particularly with the Conservatives, where you have a blue background behind (if you have default link colours in your browser) blue or purple text, depedning if a user has previously visited the link. I think we need to consider the alternative, which is to not use colour at all. --
705:
685:
641:
861:
866:
775:, this makes sense to me. In fact, I wound up on this talk page because the differing colour scheme perplexed me and I was trying to see if there was any particular reason why. If nothing else there need to be
245:
144:
352:
I've gone ahead and been bold and radically changed the template. Before, it was sorted by party; I've changed it to sort by state (with party colors), just as the
Australian and American templates do.
570:
Another option might be to list members by party affiliation rather than by province. I might suggest that (for now) affiliation to party is more important than what province they come from.
851:
856:
386:
can be arranged into multiple columns, and in
Australia, there are only six states and a territorial section. But here, using the same format results in a template that's
39:
700:
templates. So, I propose, for the purposes of simplicity, streamlining, and using the
Canadian context, that we update this template's party colour shading template to
841:
846:
393:
The colour choices for party identification are also too subtle, in my opinion; on the screen I'm looking at right now, the PC and
Liberal colours are at best
677:
225:
140:
74:
876:
397:
distinguishable from each other if I'm looking at the screen straight on โ and if I look at the screen even slightly askance, the colours completely
376:
As currently formatted, it's massively oversized. Because the United States senate is structured differently each state has exactly two senators, so
881:
531:
495:
886:
871:
80:
697:
543:
I agree the colours are almost indistinguishable, but my concern is that increasing the colour's prominence will not be consistent with
314:
689:
808:
190:
575:
457:
401:. And before I applied the Canadian red-white style override, against the navbox-default blue background the colours were even
701:
693:
681:
637:
380:
305:
269:
20:
826:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
667:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
69:
507:
471:
181:
135:
110:
60:
571:
453:
626:
24:
738:
523:
487:
515:
479:
805:
116:
706:
Knowledge:WikiProject
Political parties and politicians in Canada/list of parties#Senate-only caucuses
686:
Knowledge:WikiProject
Political parties and politicians in Canada/list of parties#Senate-only caucuses
642:
Knowledge:WikiProject
Political parties and politicians in Canada/list of parties#Senate-only caucuses
592:
554:
50:
313:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
189:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
647:
65:
434:
415:
46:
800:
785:
763:
716:
651:
608:
I can hardly read the text in CPC in the new format. Dark blue background with blue text. --
544:
746:
609:
587:
549:
297:
813:
789:
767:
720:
636:
There is a clear consensus to update this template's party colour shading template to
612:
603:
579:
565:
461:
438:
425:
bit less busy and more organized. I'm not entirely convinced that it reduces the size
419:
365:
291:
281:
263:
835:
354:
173:
730:
430:
411:
215:
781:
759:
712:
287:
163:
157:
129:
235:
310:
186:
862:
Template-Class Political parties and politicians in Canada articles
758:
top and bottom templates and consensus decision reached. Thanks. --
867:
NA-importance Political parties and politicians in Canada articles
585:
will not; why categorize them under the less static grouping? --
92:
15:
234:
214:
246:
WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada
309:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
185:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
688:documentation. This template uses the more generic
634:
371:A couple of comments about this template style:
852:Template-Class Governments of Canada articles
8:
857:NA-importance Governments of Canada articles
678:Template:Canadian federal political parties
258:
124:
109:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
260:
126:
842:Template-Class Canada-related articles
755:Added Note from RfC-initiating editor:
847:NA-importance Canada-related articles
303:This template is within the scope of
179:This template is within the scope of
98:
96:
7:
661:The following discussion is closed.
698:Template:Party shading/Conservative
625:Switching colour template for this
115:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
690:Template:Party shading/Independent
405:indistinguishable from each other.
14:
822:The discussion above is closed.
226:WikiProject Governments of Canada
877:Template-Class politics articles
290:
280:
262:
166:
156:
128:
97:
40:Click here to start a new topic.
882:NA-importance politics articles
654:) 09:28, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
702:Template:Canadian party colour
694:Template:Party shading/Liberal
682:Template:Canadian party colour
638:Template:Canadian party colour
518:(Ind.) or Not affiliated (N/A)
482:(Ind.) or Not affiliated (N/A)
323:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics
243:This template is supported by
223:This template is supported by
1:
887:WikiProject Politics articles
814:10:06, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
798:
790:02:43, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
439:06:59, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
420:06:10, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
366:00:23, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
326:Template:WikiProject Politics
317:and see a list of open tasks.
193:and see a list of open tasks.
37:Put new text under old text.
872:All WikiProject Canada pages
768:01:51, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
721:01:47, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
199:Knowledge:WikiProject Canada
202:Template:WikiProject Canada
45:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
903:
613:20:22, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
604:16:13, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
580:15:34, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
566:14:42, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
462:14:30, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
275:
242:
222:
151:
123:
75:Be welcoming to newcomers
824:Please do not modify it.
664:Please do not modify it.
532:Progressive Conservative
496:Progressive Conservative
205:Canada-related articles
656:
239:
219:
70:avoid personal attacks
572:EncyclopediaUpdaticus
454:EncyclopediaUpdaticus
447:Change colours please
381:Current U.S. Senators
238:
218:
429:, but it's a start.
390:too long vertically.
306:WikiProject Politics
739:LiteratureCompanion
704:as outlined in the
640:as outlined in the
524:Independent Liberal
488:Independent Liberal
240:
220:
182:WikiProject Canada
111:content assessment
81:dispute resolution
42:
410:Any other input?
345:
344:
341:
340:
337:
336:
329:politics articles
257:
256:
253:
252:
91:
90:
61:Assume good faith
38:
894:
812:
750:
742:
734:
726:Friendly tag(s):
666:
627:Senate of Canada
599:
595:
590:
561:
557:
552:
539:Happy medium???
534:
527:
519:
511:
498:
491:
483:
475:
385:
379:
363:
360:
357:
331:
330:
327:
324:
321:
300:
295:
294:
284:
277:
276:
266:
259:
207:
206:
203:
200:
197:
176:
171:
170:
169:
160:
153:
152:
147:
132:
125:
102:
101:
100:
93:
25:Senate of Canada
16:
902:
901:
897:
896:
895:
893:
892:
891:
832:
831:
830:
744:
736:
728:
708:documentation.
662:
657:
631:
600:
597:
593:
588:
562:
559:
555:
550:
530:
522:
514:
506:
494:
486:
478:
470:
449:
383:
377:
361:
358:
355:
350:
328:
325:
322:
319:
318:
298:Politics portal
296:
289:
204:
201:
198:
195:
194:
172:
167:
165:
138:
87:
86:
56:
12:
11:
5:
900:
898:
890:
889:
884:
879:
874:
869:
864:
859:
854:
849:
844:
834:
833:
829:
828:
818:
817:
816:
792:
770:
684:template, per
671:
670:
669:
644:documentation.
633:
632:
630:
623:
622:
621:
620:
619:
618:
617:
616:
615:
596:
558:
538:
536:
535:
528:
520:
512:
500:
499:
492:
484:
476:
448:
445:
444:
443:
442:
441:
407:
406:
391:
373:
372:
349:
346:
343:
342:
339:
338:
335:
334:
332:
315:the discussion
302:
301:
285:
273:
272:
267:
255:
254:
251:
250:
241:
231:
230:
221:
211:
210:
208:
191:the discussion
178:
177:
161:
149:
148:
133:
121:
120:
114:
103:
89:
88:
85:
84:
77:
72:
63:
57:
55:
54:
43:
34:
33:
30:
29:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
899:
888:
885:
883:
880:
878:
875:
873:
870:
868:
865:
863:
860:
858:
855:
853:
850:
848:
845:
843:
840:
839:
837:
827:
825:
820:
819:
815:
810:
807:
804:
803:
796:
793:
791:
787:
783:
778:
774:
771:
769:
765:
761:
756:
753:
752:
751:
748:
740:
732:
727:
723:
722:
718:
714:
709:
707:
703:
699:
695:
691:
687:
683:
679:
674:
673:Hi everyone,
668:
665:
659:
658:
655:
653:
649:
645:
643:
639:
628:
624:
614:
611:
607:
606:
605:
602:
601:
591:
583:
582:
581:
577:
573:
569:
568:
567:
564:
563:
553:
546:
542:
541:
540:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
513:
509:
505:
504:
503:
497:
493:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
468:
467:
464:
463:
459:
455:
446:
440:
436:
432:
428:
423:
422:
421:
417:
413:
409:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
389:
382:
375:
374:
370:
369:
368:
367:
364:
347:
333:
316:
312:
308:
307:
299:
293:
288:
286:
283:
279:
278:
274:
271:
268:
265:
261:
248:
247:
237:
233:
232:
228:
227:
217:
213:
212:
209:
192:
188:
184:
183:
175:
174:Canada portal
164:
162:
159:
155:
154:
150:
146:
142:
137:
134:
131:
127:
122:
118:
112:
108:
104:
95:
94:
82:
78:
76:
73:
71:
67:
64:
62:
59:
58:
52:
48:
47:Learn to edit
44:
41:
36:
35:
32:
31:
26:
22:
18:
17:
823:
821:
801:
794:
777:more colours
776:
772:
754:
725:
724:
710:
675:
672:
663:
660:
646:
635:
586:
548:
537:
508:Conservative
501:
472:Conservative
465:
450:
426:
402:
398:
394:
387:
351:
304:
244:
224:
180:
117:WikiProjects
106:
19:This is the
802:SMcCandlish
516:Independent
502:My change:
480:Independent
141:Governments
836:Categories
760:Doug Mehus
747:Natural RX
713:Doug Mehus
610:kelapstick
680:uses the
545:WP:COLOUR
466:Current:
399:disappear
83:if needed
66:Be polite
27:template.
21:talk page
629:template
526:(Ind. L)
490:(Ind. L)
348:Untitled
320:Politics
311:politics
270:Politics
145:Politics
107:template
51:get help
795:Support
731:Bearcat
589:Natural
551:Natural
431:Bearcat
412:Bearcat
782:Kawnhr
743:, and
696:, and
648:Cunard
427:enough
395:barely
196:Canada
187:Canada
136:Canada
113:scale.
356:ยฟSFGi
105:This
79:Seek
786:talk
764:talk
717:talk
711:- --
676:The
652:talk
576:talk
458:talk
435:talk
416:talk
403:more
362:nts!
68:and
811:๐ผ
773:Yes
510:(C)
474:(C)
388:far
838::
799:โ
788:)
766:)
735:,
719:)
692:,
578:)
460:)
437:)
418:)
384:}}
378:{{
143:/
139::
49:;
809:ยข
806:โ
784:(
762:(
749::
745:@
741::
737:@
733::
729:@
715:(
650:(
598:X
594:R
574:(
560:X
556:R
456:(
433:(
414:(
359:ะ
249:.
229:.
119::
53:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
