688:
180:
629:
Did anyone notice that the opening sentence of this tag "contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information." Contains wording that (1) Promotes the subject of improving the article in a subjective manner (2) without imparting real information (where
454:
doesn't show it, so I assume it doesn't exist. It wouldn't be spectacularly usefel, either. There is nothing subtle about peacock terms. If you discover one or two in an article or section, it's relatively easy to just remove it, so an inline template wouldn't of much use.
509:) is an improvement over the old. It's darker, non-standard, and isn't sized to 40px width (which means that the template is stretched vertically). This should be reverted. There is no absolute need for every individual warning template to use its own image.
608:
Incidentally I would encourage you to try and help improve the relevant bits of the Manual of Style. Those particular parts were mangled in 2009 when they tried to roll Weasel and
Peacock into "reliable sources" and they have since been a bit incoherent.
276:
Peacock words tend to be obvious, especially in an article overflowing with them. There is a link for those who do understand the phrase "peacock words". I don't see any problems with this template. I suggest this template be removed from the new and
352:
The icon seems to be a little too cluttered or claustrophobic - especially with its relatively small size in the template. The peacock buster symbol seems to cause most of the problem - suggest removing? Opinions?
155:
has suggested that this tag is better suited for use on talk pages rather than articles because it may confuse ordinary users. If that's the consensus, the {{{1|article or section}}} parameter should be removed.
595:
The wording was replaced to match the wording at the Manual of Style section linked to. There was a mismatch between the template and MoS. If you want to change the MoS I suggest you open a discussion there.
278:
633:
Can we at least agree that this tag can only be ever used under the condition that constructive, concrete and actionable information for improvement is provided on the talk page of the tagged page.
575:); all I did was fix the code so it would categorize correctly and such. As far as I can tell, the reasoning is that whether something is peacock wording has nothing to do with
108:
It's not just you. What's the relevance of that image to the template? I checked the image page and the
Commons, and can't find any grounds for its inclusion. --
74:
630:
the article is wrong, or how it can be improved). As such, this tag should be tagged with itself, which should be tagged with this tag...... (ad infinitum).
697:
524:
255:
Needs a talk page link, it's not always clear what the words that constitute "peacock words" refer to. Soon to be fixed. Besides: beautiful image!!
39:
80:
408:
726:
392:
20:
126:
117:
I guess it's supposed to look like a peacock's tail.... BTW I think this template is a little too flashy for the article space.
69:
186:
60:
506:
546:
It is unclear who changed this template and why. Was there any discussion? I prefer the old version. Anyone agree? . . .
388:
707:
Please remove or replace such wording and instead of making proclamations about a subject's importance, use facts and
572:
708:
551:
451:
329:
301:
262:
220:
412:
474:
701:
430:
130:
50:
532:
514:
463:
426:
Is there an inline version of this template, similar to the //weasel// (curly brackets substituted) and
376:
65:
547:
199:
122:
673:
152:
487:
354:
171:
744:
441:
358:
638:
238:
46:
653:
587:
528:
510:
459:
372:
326:
298:
259:
217:
24:
613:
600:
580:
566:
282:
194:
118:
478:
576:
740:
437:
157:
109:
99:
634:
234:
649:
584:
332:
304:
265:
223:
670:
promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information
610:
597:
562:
213:
I hereby emit admiration for your delectable image. Be praised, o
Monkeyblue!
748:
657:
642:
616:
603:
590:
555:
535:
517:
492:
469:
445:
416:
396:
382:
362:
337:
309:
285:
270:
242:
228:
205:
160:
138:
112:
102:
676:
terms are, I still had to stare at it for a bit, to see the connection.
185:
179:
648:
But then wouldn't the talk page have to be tagged... which in turn...
368:
Agree. The image is completely gratuitous and should be removed.
579:, it's still peacock wording either way. I've dropped a note at
281:"Templates needing talk links and other improvements" catagory.
407:
Please add interwiki link ] or create documentation subpage. --
681:
15:
174:. Anyone not want me to replace the current vector image.
98:
Is it just me, or does the icon look like a clamshell? --
151:Echoing Dylan Lake's concerns above, an editor at
8:
672:", pretty opaque. Even knowing exactly what
294:OK, I'll do it. Thanks for your attention.
727:Learn how and when to remove this message
583:in case they're not watching this page.
664:Suggested improvement to opaque wording
387:Disagree. I like the peacock symbol. --
700:that is purely subjective and not an
7:
23:for discussing improvements to the
14:
45:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
686:
523:Broader discussion of the issue
184:
178:
40:Click here to start a new topic.
711:to demonstrate that importance.
617:10:33, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
604:06:28, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
591:23:04, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
556:21:20, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
529:Chris Cunningham (not at work)
511:Chris Cunningham (not at work)
103:16:51, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
1:
749:02:29, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
536:17:43, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
518:16:38, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
507:file:Viewpoint disconnect.png
139:22:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
113:01:08, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
37:Put new text under old text.
702:assertion of verifiable fact
505:I don't think the new icon (
363:10:40, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
161:16:28, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
561:The wording was changed by
764:
643:18:11, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
243:17:17, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
679:How about this, instead:
668:I find the bolded part, "
658:19:01, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
493:12:16, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
470:09:38, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
452:Category:Inline templates
446:13:04, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
397:02:23, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
383:09:20, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
206:11:52, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
75:Be welcoming to newcomers
338:17:42, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
310:17:42, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
286:16:54, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
271:09:55, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
229:09:55, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
475:Template:Peacock_inline
417:11:20, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
389:TheZachMorrisExperience
170:I have thrown together
695:This article contains
70:avoid personal attacks
147:Article or talk page?
172:Image:No-peacock.svg
542:Changes 26 Sep 2012
251:Improvement request
233:Very nice indeed!
81:dispute resolution
42:
737:
736:
729:
698:laudatory wording
403:interwiki request
91:
90:
61:Assume good faith
38:
755:
732:
725:
721:
718:
712:
690:
689:
682:
490:
485:
468:
435:
429:
381:
336:
308:
269:
227:
202:
197:
188:
182:
135:
16:
763:
762:
758:
757:
756:
754:
753:
752:
733:
722:
716:
713:
706:
691:
687:
666:
627:
581:User talk:BozMo
548:Mean as custard
544:
503:
488:
479:
456:
433:
427:
424:
405:
369:
350:
323:
295:
256:
253:
214:
200:
195:
168:
149:
131:
96:
87:
86:
56:
12:
11:
5:
761:
759:
735:
734:
717:September 2024
694:
692:
685:
665:
662:
661:
660:
626:
623:
622:
621:
620:
619:
606:
543:
540:
539:
538:
502:
499:
498:
497:
496:
495:
423:
422:Inline version
420:
409:219.164.57.180
404:
401:
400:
399:
385:
349:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
315:
314:
313:
312:
289:
288:
252:
249:
248:
247:
246:
245:
231:
190:
189:
167:
164:
148:
145:
144:
143:
142:
141:
95:
92:
89:
88:
85:
84:
77:
72:
63:
57:
55:
54:
43:
34:
33:
30:
29:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
760:
751:
750:
746:
742:
731:
728:
720:
710:
704:
703:
699:
693:
684:
683:
680:
677:
675:
671:
663:
659:
655:
651:
647:
646:
645:
644:
640:
636:
631:
624:
618:
615:
612:
607:
605:
602:
599:
594:
593:
592:
589:
586:
582:
578:
574:
571:
568:
564:
560:
559:
558:
557:
553:
549:
541:
537:
534:
530:
526:
522:
521:
520:
519:
516:
512:
508:
500:
494:
491:
486:
484:
483:
477:Here you go.
476:
473:
472:
471:
467:
466:
465:
461:
453:
450:
449:
448:
447:
443:
439:
432:
431:weasel-inline
421:
419:
418:
414:
410:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
384:
380:
379:
378:
374:
367:
366:
365:
364:
360:
356:
347:
339:
335:
334:
331:
328:
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
311:
307:
306:
303:
300:
293:
292:
291:
290:
287:
284:
280:
275:
274:
273:
272:
268:
267:
264:
261:
250:
244:
240:
236:
232:
230:
226:
225:
222:
219:
212:
211:
210:
209:
208:
207:
204:
203:
198:
187:
181:
177:
176:
175:
173:
165:
163:
162:
159:
154:
146:
140:
136:
134:
128:
124:
120:
116:
115:
114:
111:
107:
106:
105:
104:
101:
93:
82:
78:
76:
73:
71:
67:
64:
62:
59:
58:
52:
48:
47:Learn to edit
44:
41:
36:
35:
32:
31:
26:
22:
18:
17:
738:
723:
714:
696:
678:
669:
667:
632:
628:
569:
545:
504:
481:
480:
458:
457:
425:
406:
371:
370:
351:
324:
296:
279:questionable
257:
254:
215:
193:
191:
169:
150:
132:
97:
19:This is the
709:attribution
464:Dorftrottel
377:Dorftrottel
348:Improvement
166:SVG version
739:Thoughts?
674:WP:Peacock
283:Neitherday
153:WP:PEACOCK
119:Dylan Lake
482:Chrononem
196:Monkeyblu
83:if needed
66:Be polite
27:template.
21:talk page
741:Mathglot
625:Circular
573:contribs
501:New icon
438:CapnZapp
355:Wisdom89
192:Thanks,
158:Muchness
110:Sasoriza
100:Lethargy
51:get help
635:Arnoutf
235:notwist
25:Peacock
650:G41rn8
585:Anomie
436:tags?
327:Rursus
325:Said:
322:Done!
299:Rursus
297:Said:
260:Rursus
258:Said:
218:Rursus
216:Said:
611:BozMo
598:BozMo
563:BozMo
79:Seek
745:talk
654:talk
639:talk
614:talk
601:talk
577:WP:V
567:talk
552:talk
533:talk
525:here
515:talk
460:user
442:talk
413:talk
393:talk
373:user
359:talk
239:talk
94:Icon
68:and
183:v.
747:)
656:)
641:)
609:--
596:--
554:)
531:-
527:.
513:-
444:)
434:}}
428:{{
415:)
395:)
361:)
241:)
156:--
137:)
49:;
743:(
730:)
724:(
719:)
715:(
705:.
652:(
637:(
588:⚔
570:·
565:(
550:(
489:☎
462::
440:(
411:(
391:(
375::
357:(
333:★
330:☺
305:★
302:☺
266:★
263:☺
237:(
224:★
221:☺
201:e
133:ε
129:·
127:c
125:·
123:t
121:(
53:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
