39:
21:
89:
127:, which doesn't make sense. Categorization has nothing to do with the "style" of the article. A large number of other templates dump their pages into this category, so the category is of minimal usefulness to find articles needing attention to categories.
130:
There are several other templates that do deal with article categorization. It would make more sense for this template to use a category more closely associated with other category related templates. (Probably should be its own category, e.g.
222:
If a template like this is not used, it may indicate a need for greater visibility of the template, or that cleanup efforts have been successful. That does not mean it may not be needed in the future.
104:
124:
215:
addresses this to some extent. Certainly there may be differences of opinion, but there certainly are or have been pages with way to many categories. Such as
55:
136:
267:
46:
26:
178:
132:
95:
202:
234:
192:
51:
54:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
241:
212:
211:
In the deletion discussion questions were raised as to what constitutes too many categories.
139:.) This would allow those interested in cleaning up categorization to find apropos articles.
38:
20:
249:
159:
144:
261:
184:. That name was better, since it made it clearer when to use it. The current name
253:
163:
148:
245:
155:
140:
88:
83:
244:, that is where I looked for this template originally.)
216:
125:
Category:Knowledge (XXG) articles needing style editing
188:
is not as clear. The name is now more confusing with
219:
of a page about a minor author, with 72 categories.
50:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
240:. (Since the link to the policy document is
8:
226:I think it should be moved back to the name
15:
137:Category:Knowledge (XXG) category cleanup
123:Currently this template puts articles in
17:
64:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Categories
119:Template should have its own category
44:This template is within the scope of
7:
170:Too many categories was clearer name
174:This template was formerly called
99:
94:This template was considered for
14:
87:
37:
19:
67:Template:WikiProject Categories
1:
58:and see a list of open tasks.
268:WikiProject Categories pages
154:I went ahead and did this.
133:Category:too many categories
284:
254:20:20, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
164:05:23, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
149:08:58, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
32:
230:, or perhaps moved to
47:WikiProject Categories
102:. The result of the
228:Too many categories
179:Too many categories
135:, a subcategory of
70:Categories articles
203:Improve categories
116:
115:
82:
81:
78:
77:
275:
239:
233:
207:
201:
197:
191:
183:
177:
101:
100:25 December 2010
91:
84:
72:
71:
68:
65:
62:
41:
34:
33:
23:
16:
283:
282:
278:
277:
276:
274:
273:
272:
258:
257:
237:
235:overcategorized
231:
205:
199:
195:
189:
181:
175:
172:
121:
69:
66:
63:
60:
59:
12:
11:
5:
281:
279:
271:
270:
260:
259:
171:
168:
167:
166:
120:
117:
114:
113:
92:
80:
79:
76:
75:
73:
56:the discussion
42:
30:
29:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
280:
269:
266:
265:
263:
256:
255:
251:
247:
243:
236:
229:
224:
220:
218:
214:
209:
204:
194:
193:Checkcategory
187:
180:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
152:
151:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
128:
126:
118:
111:
107:
106:
97:
93:
90:
86:
85:
74:
57:
53:
49:
48:
43:
40:
36:
35:
31:
28:
25:
22:
18:
227:
225:
221:
217:this version
210:
186:Recategorize
185:
173:
129:
122:
110:no consensus
109:
103:
45:
242:WP:overcat
213:WP:Overcat
105:discussion
61:Categories
52:categories
27:Categories
262:Category
96:deletion
198:, and
246:Zodon
156:Zodon
141:Zodon
108:was "
250:talk
160:talk
145:talk
98:on
264::
252:)
238:}}
232:{{
208:.
206:}}
200:{{
196:}}
190:{{
182:}}
176:{{
162:)
147:)
112:".
248:(
158:(
143:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
