Knowledge (XXG)

Territorial jurisdiction (United States)

Source đź“ť

31: 456:
cases. In the quintessential stream of commerce case, a defendant in one state sells a widget to a manufacturer in the same state, which incorporates the widget into a retail product and sells it to a consumer in another state, who then sues claiming injury from the widget. The leading Supreme Court
342:
Diplomatic grounds. The grounds of foreign embassies and some consulates, like vessels at sea, are considered part of the territory of the nation they represent. Contrary to popular belief, however, diplomatic missions do not enjoy full extraterritorial status and are not sovereign territory of the
480:
and territorial jurisdiction are closely related for practical purposes. A change of venue may be sought either within the territorial jurisdiction of a court, or with the consent of the receiving jurisdiction and the parties, within the jurisdiction of another court, provided it has jurisdiction
451:
Territorial jurisdiction problems are acute in cases involving business transactions conducted across state lines, where the defendant may not have set foot in the other state, but still conducted affairs with the other state's residents through correspondence, the shipment of goods, or indirect
338:
National flag vessels at sea. The vessel is considered to be part of the territory of the nation whose flag it flies, and subject to the laws of that nation. A vessel without a national flag may be considered a stateless vessel. A stateless vessel is, on the high seas, not subject to any State's
284:
refers to a court's power over events and persons within the bounds of a particular geographic territory. If a court does not have territorial jurisdiction over the events or persons within it, then the court cannot bind the defendant to an obligation or adjudicate any rights involving them.
464:
and operated by a California citizen. Courts must decide in which locations, under what circumstances, the exercise of territorial jurisdiction over the citizen for claims arising from the website comports with traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. For more, see
448:, have long-arm statutes that give their courts personal jurisdiction to the extent constitutionally permitted.) In some exceptional circumstances, FRCP 4 grants a federal court personal jurisdiction when the law of the state in which it sits would not. 357:
Extraterritorial jurisdiction. This is asserted by most nations over their military and diplomatic personnel while abroad, and by some nations over subjects like piracy and offenses against the law of nations, such as "crimes against humanity" or
435:
limit the exercise of subject or personal jurisdiction beyond territorial limits. The same outer territorial boundaries for subject jurisdiction apply in both state courts and federal courts. Moreover, because of Rule 4 of the
490: 264: 343:
represented state. Rather, the premises of diplomatic missions remain under the jurisdiction of the host state while being afforded special privileges (such as immunity from most local laws) by the
293:, which is the power of a court to render a judgment concerning particular persons, wherever they may be. Personal jurisdiction, territorial jurisdiction, subject-matter jurisdiction, and proper 331:
International commons. Territory not under the jurisdiction of any nation, but open to use by all, subject to treaty restrictions. This includes the high seas beyond coastal territorial limits,
321:
Trust territories or dependencies. These are territories with some of the attributes of a nation-state but not full independence, administered by a nation, perhaps with international sanction.
257: 390:
Territories over which the state government has exclusive jurisdiction for a broad range of subjects. State territory excluding territory ceded under Art. I Sec. 8 Cl. 17.
250: 460:
Internet cases raise several troublesome territorial jurisdiction problems. For example, a website may be viewed anywhere in the world, though it is hosted in
350:
Foreign military bases. Like diplomatic facilities, they may or may not constitute territory of the nation whose forces are stationed there, depending on a
344: 414:
Administrative district territories, with powers to make rules and adjudicate cases concerning things like utilities, transportation facitlies, etc.
466: 217: 38: 444:) of the state in which it sits, even when the state has not extended personal jurisdiction to its territorial limits. (Some states, such as 236: 95: 140: 437: 396:
State territory over which the central government has jurisdiction, either exclusive or concurrent, on a few specific subjects.
189: 115: 227: 424: 402:
Township territory within which the town government has exclusive or concurrent jurisdiction with the county or state.
286: 106: 428: 393:
Unincorporated territories over which the central government has exclusive jurisdiction under Art. IV Sec. 3 Cl. 2.
351: 175: 130: 559: 318:
Unincorporated national territory. This can include territories in which the residents do not have full rights.
85: 30: 399:
County territory within which the county government has exclusive or concurrent jurisdiction with the state.
380: 120: 564: 290: 151: 125: 20: 408:
State or local judicial districts within which the court for that district has exclusive jurisdiction.
135: 222: 212: 207: 168: 80: 405:
Federal judicial districts within which the court for that district has exclusive jurisdiction.
504:
A Dissertation on the Nature and Extent of the Jurisdiction of the Courts of the United States
384: 281: 289:, which is the power of a court to render a judgment concerning a certain subject matter, or 441: 371:
This will vary from one nation to another, but we can illustrate the types by examining the
60: 452:
agents. Even more difficult, and more unsettled, territorial jurisdiction issues arise in
42: 503: 440:(FRCP 4), a federal court ordinarily applies the personal jurisdiction statutes (e.g., 65: 50: 553: 541: 411:
Neighborhood associations that may exercise townlike powers over their neighborhoods.
372: 324:
Occupied territories. These are usually the result of war and conquest, and ruled by
312: 199: 375:, and how there can be different territorial jurisdiction for different subjects: 477: 432: 325: 161: 445: 332: 457:
stream of commerce case resulted in a split, failing to clarify the issue.
311:
Incorporated national territory, within which all residents are considered
517: 461: 359: 75: 70: 19:
For the principle of territorial jurisdiction in international law, see
294: 491:
Special Maritime and Territorial Jurisdiction of the United States
362:, or taxation of income of citizens obtained from foreign sources. 306:
Types of jurisdictional territory within the international system
297:
to the defendant are prerequisites for a valid judgment.
285:
Territorial jurisdiction is to be distinguished from
379:Territories over which the central government has 518:Jurisdiction over Federal Areas within the States 367:Types of jurisdictional territory within a nation 258: 8: 513:, Edward S. Stimson (1936) Foundation Press 538:Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court 383:for a broad range of subjects. Created by 265: 251: 102: 25: 345:Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 530: 467:Personal jurisdiction in internet cases 188: 150: 105: 94: 49: 37: 301:The types of territorial jurisdiction 237:Adequate and independent state ground 7: 544:(1987). Decided February 24, 1987. 507:, Peter Stephen Du Ponceau (1824). 425:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 142:Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 438:Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 29: 1: 287:subject-matter jurisdiction 581: 352:status of forces agreement 18: 511:Conflict of Criminal Laws 328:imposed by the conqueror. 278:Territorial jurisdiction 86:Constitutional avoidance 16:Territorial jurisdiction 387:, Art. I Sec. 8 Cl. 17. 339:exclusive jurisdiction. 381:exclusive jurisdiction 473:Relationship to venue 419:Constitutional limits 291:personal jurisdiction 126:Amount in controversy 39:United States federal 21:Territorial principle 481:over the same laws. 213:Anti-Injunction Act 81:Political questions 454:stream of commerce 335:, and Outer Space. 218:Sovereign immunity 442:long-arm statutes 385:U.S. Constitution 282:United States law 275: 274: 184: 183: 61:Advisory opinions 572: 545: 535: 431:requirements of 267: 260: 253: 143: 116:Federal question 103: 33: 26: 580: 579: 575: 574: 573: 571: 570: 569: 560:Civil procedure 550: 549: 548: 536: 532: 528: 499: 487: 475: 421: 369: 308: 303: 271: 242: 239: 141: 90: 43:civil procedure 41: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 578: 576: 568: 567: 562: 552: 551: 547: 546: 529: 527: 524: 523: 522: 514: 508: 498: 495: 494: 493: 486: 483: 474: 471: 429:constitutional 427:has held that 420: 417: 416: 415: 412: 409: 406: 403: 400: 397: 394: 391: 388: 368: 365: 364: 363: 355: 348: 340: 336: 329: 322: 319: 316: 307: 304: 302: 299: 273: 272: 270: 269: 262: 255: 247: 244: 243: 241: 240: 235: 233: 229:Rooker–Feldman 225: 220: 215: 210: 205: 196: 193: 192: 186: 185: 182: 181: 180: 179: 172: 165: 155: 154: 148: 147: 146: 145: 138: 133: 128: 123: 118: 110: 109: 107:Subject-matter 99: 98: 92: 91: 89: 88: 83: 78: 73: 68: 63: 57: 54: 53: 51:Justiciability 47: 46: 35: 34: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 577: 566: 563: 561: 558: 557: 555: 543: 539: 534: 531: 525: 520: 519: 515: 512: 509: 506: 505: 501: 500: 496: 492: 489: 488: 484: 482: 479: 472: 470: 468: 463: 458: 455: 449: 447: 443: 439: 434: 430: 426: 418: 413: 410: 407: 404: 401: 398: 395: 392: 389: 386: 382: 378: 377: 376: 374: 373:United States 366: 361: 356: 353: 349: 346: 341: 337: 334: 330: 327: 323: 320: 317: 314: 310: 309: 305: 300: 298: 296: 292: 288: 283: 279: 268: 263: 261: 256: 254: 249: 248: 246: 245: 238: 234: 232: 230: 226: 224: 221: 219: 216: 214: 211: 209: 206: 204: 202: 198: 197: 195: 194: 191: 187: 178: 177: 173: 171: 170: 166: 164: 163: 159: 158: 157: 156: 153: 149: 144: 139: 137: 134: 132: 129: 127: 124: 122: 119: 117: 114: 113: 112: 111: 108: 104: 101: 100: 97: 93: 87: 84: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 67: 64: 62: 59: 58: 56: 55: 52: 48: 44: 40: 36: 32: 28: 27: 22: 565:Jurisdiction 542:480 U.S. 102 537: 533: 516: 510: 502: 476: 459: 453: 450: 422: 370: 277: 276: 228: 200: 176:Quasi in rem 174: 167: 160: 131:Supplemental 96:Jurisdiction 433:due process 326:martial law 162:In personam 554:Categories 497:References 446:California 333:Antarctica 223:Abrogation 208:Abstention 190:Federalism 315:citizens. 121:Diversity 45:doctrines 485:See also 462:Anguilla 360:genocide 313:American 231:doctrine 203:doctrine 152:Personal 76:Mootness 71:Ripeness 66:Standing 136:Removal 521:(1954) 295:notice 169:In rem 526:Notes 478:Venue 423:The 201:Erie 280:in 556:: 540:, 469:. 354:. 347:. 266:e 259:t 252:v 23:.

Index

Territorial principle
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
United States federal
civil procedure
Justiciability
Advisory opinions
Standing
Ripeness
Mootness
Political questions
Constitutional avoidance
Jurisdiction
Subject-matter
Federal question
Diversity
Amount in controversy
Supplemental
Removal
Class Action Fairness Act of 2005
Personal
In personam
In rem
Quasi in rem
Federalism
Erie doctrine
Abstention
Anti-Injunction Act
Sovereign immunity
Abrogation
Rooker–Feldman doctrine

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑