33:
384:
316:
83:
131:
173:
Public discussion of the bird first surfaced on 6 May, on the UKBirdnet mailing list, which at that time was the main internet discussion forum for
British birders. Early postings from Phil Hansbro (based on a conversation with Brett Richards, who had been to see the bird) and from Ian Broadbent made
202:
published an account of the bird, written by Tim
Cleeves, his first public statement on the bird. The article dealt in detail with the circumstances of the bird's finding, its appearance, his reasons for making a confident identification of the bird as a slender-billed curlew, ageing and sexing of
351:
On 9–10 August 2002, and possibly for a few days before that, another bird showing characteristics of slender-billed curlew was reported from
Druridge Bay. This bird was described as being 25% smaller than Eurasian curlew with a slender bill tapering to a narrow point, with black spotting on its
112:
News of the bird was broadcast on the national rare bird information services. As, at this stage, there was not a consensus on the identity of the bird, some of the services used cautious language, e.g. Birdline referred to the bird as a "controversial curlew thought by some observers to be a
307:
in
October 2004, and an identification article by Andrea Corso (et al. 2014) re-opened the debate on the identity of the Druridge bird. In 2013, slender-billed curlew was removed from the British List following a review of the Druridge Bay record by the BBRC and BOURC.
113:
Slender-billed". Because of the uncertainty over the identity, some birders chose not to travel to see it, although many others did. The bird was last seen on
Thursday 7 May. It was photographed (albeit distantly) and three video recordings were made.
66:, one of the rarest birds in the world; however, this identification provoked scepticism from experts. The bird was initially accepted as this species (and therefore became the first record of slender-billed curlew in Britain) by the
265:
that first-summer slender-billed curlews may not have eye-rings, or that the strength of this feature may vary between individuals, and that in fact the
Druridge bird did have an eye-ring, albeit not as prominent as the Merja Zerga
203:
slender-billed curlews, their conservation status and likelihood of vagrancy. The article was accompanied by an editorial comment endorsing
Cleeves's views. Cleeves also wrote a short account for the July edition of
372:
to see the bird, stating that they believed it to be a slender-billed curlew. However, by the time this bird was last seen, most observers had formed the opinion that this bird was a first-winter
Eurasian curlew.
292:
of an account by Tim
Cleeves of the finding of the bird, and a summary of the BBRC analysis of submitted descriptions, photographs and video footage, written by Jimmy Steele and Didier Vangeluwe.
241:
from Chris Heard outlined the same concerns, and pointed out also that
Eurasian curlew can show spotted flank patterning and white underwings. This letter drew a response from Brett Richards.
212:
These two articles prompted letters from Chris Heard outlining reasons why he believed that the case for identification of the bird as a slender-billed curlew was not proven. In his letter to
152:
its bill was shorter than is typical for Eurasian curlew, and straight for the first half of its length, rather than evenly curved; the bill was also thin and narrow in both depth and width
510:
Collinson J.M., Rowlands A., Steele J.G., Mclnerny C.J. & Hudson N. 2014. The review of the record of Slender-billed Curlew at Druridge Bay, Northumberland. British Birds 107: 389–404.
299:
community, but a number of British and foreign birders are not convinced that the bird was a slender-billed curlew, including several high-profile figures. A first-winter curlew at
352:
flanks, and unmarked white underwings. This bird was not photographed, and only seen by a small number of observers, and no formal submission was made to the Rarities Committee.
71:
165:
One other point of note is that the bird's upperwing-coverts were worn, and they had a silvery appearance, contrasting with its scapular feathers which were very dark.
237:
An editorial comment was published in reply to this letter, which included comments made by a number of the observers involved with the Druridge bird. A letter to
295:
Opinions on the exact identity of the bird remain divided — the conclusion arrived at by BBRC and BOURC is shared by a significant majority of the British
518:
Corso A., Jansen J.J.F.J. & Kokay S. 2014. A review if the identification criteria and variability of the Slender-billed Curlew. British Birds 107: 339–370.
62:
in May 1998, whose species identification proved to be controversial. The bird was identified by its finder, and most others who saw it, as a first-summer
579:
122:
118:11) has claimed that a large part of the credit for the record should rest with him, due to his role in persuading others to travel to see the bird.
498:
Steele, Jimmy and Didier Vangeluwe (2002) From the Rarities Committee's files: the Slender-billed Curlew at Druridge Bay, Northumberland, in 1998
101:. The birder reported the whimbrel to Tim Cleeves who, uncertain of the bird's identification, contacted a number of other birdwatchers from the
589:
532:
149:
it also differed slightly in structure, being slimmer, and in particular thinner-necked and shorter-legged than a typical Eurasian curlew
174:
a strong case for the identification as Slender-billed Curlew. Other observers raised questions, with three aspects causing concern:
155:
the bird's flanks were clean white, patterned with rows of oval black spots, and lacked any transverse barring or anchor-shaped marks
109:
areas and asked them to come to Druridge to give an opinion. The bird was watched by six observers until 20.50 hours that evening.
220:
that the bill, while short and slim, was not correctly shaped, being too straight, and that short-billed Eurasian curlews do exist
67:
468:
The following are Chris Heard's letters expressing doubt about the bird's identity, and Brett Richards' reply to the second:
262:
that the back shape of slender-billed curlew varies depending on what the bird is doing, and so did that of the Druridge bird
360:
In October 2004, another bird showing some characteristics consistent with slender-billed curlew, was found, this time at
276:
368:. This bird generated considerable debate, with some observers, including Didier Vangeluwe, who had travelled from
192:
whether all possible alternative identifications (e.g. an aberrant Eurasian curlew or a hybrid) had been ruled out.
420:
584:
460:
288:
494:
The paper by the British Birds Rarities Committee, explaining their decision to accept the identification is:
97:
The bird in question was found by an unknown birdwatcher on Monday 4 May 1998 and was first identified as a
216:, Heard made comparisons with the Merja Zerga birds, which he had seen, and listed the following concerns:
594:
63:
36:
256:
that slender-billed curlew's bill shape is likely to vary, as does that of Eurasian curlew and whimbrel
559:
451:
205:
181:
the fact that it showed a quite different appearance from the well-watched slender-billed curlews at
118:
536:
32:
425:
116:
Although the identification of this bird is generally credited to Tim Cleeves, Brett Richards (
98:
40:
426:
BBRC comments about one of the photos of the bird published with Tim Cleeves' finders account
139:
223:
that the Druridge curlew's head was not small and rounded, while its back was too rounded
458:
Cleeves, Tim (2002) Slender-billed Curlew in Northumberland: new to Britain and Ireland
376:
The discussion about this bird's identity reopened the debate about the Druridge bird.
102:
90:
74:- however, this identification was eventually rejected in 2013 (Collinson et al. 2014)
59:
17:
383:
315:
275:
The bird was accepted as the first record of slender-billed curlew for Britain by the
573:
442:
440:
Cleeves, Tim (1998) The Slender-billed Curlew in Northumberland - a new British bird
361:
280:
198:
230:, and did not show the dark-capped appearance typical of slender-billed curlew, and
86:
55:
227:
182:
178:
the global rarity of the species and the likelihood of its occurrence in Britain
82:
300:
106:
369:
365:
304:
296:
186:
252:, responded to Chris Heard's concerns by making the following points:
146:
in size, it was closer to a whimbrel than to a typical Eurasian curlew
259:
that the Druridge bird's head-shape did appear at times to be correct
51:
130:
506:
The paper that rejects the record on behalf of the BOURC and BBRC
129:
81:
31:
479:
Heard, Chris (1998) That curlew: an alternative identification
279:
Records Committee and this was announced in a joint BBRC/BOURC
248:(to which Brett Richards contributed), and Richards' letter in
378:
310:
421:
The BOURC/BBRC Press Release announcing the bird's acceptance
472:
Heard, Chris (1998) Identification of Slender-billed Curlew
449:
Cleeves, Tim (1998) The accidental discovery of the decade?
158:
it had a very white-looking tail, with narrow greyish bars
476:
11(7):275 (with editorial comments on pages 275 and 276)
395:
327:
557:McLoughlin, John (2002) Was it a Slender-billed?
72:British Ornithologists’ Union Records Committee
436:Accounts of the bird's finding are given in:
8:
486:Richards, Brett (1998) Curlew controversy
286:This was followed by the publication in
142:, but differed in a number of features:
523:
233:that the bird did not show an eye-ring.
514:Identification article on the species
161:its underwings were white and unmarked
7:
138:The bird was close in appearance to
226:that the bird lacked a well-marked
189:in the late 1980s/early 1990s, and
25:
580:Ornithology in the United Kingdom
382:
314:
68:British Birds Rarities Committee
93:, where the curlew was sighted
1:
590:Environment of Northumberland
533:"Changes to the British List"
347:The August 2002 Druridge bird
126:Comparison to Eurasian curlew
277:British Ornithologists Union
611:
244:The editorial comment in
39:(centre), flanked by two
18:The Druridge Bay curlew
135:
94:
43:
271:BBRC/BOURC acceptance
133:
85:
64:slender-billed curlew
37:Slender-billed curlew
35:
283:on 24 January 2002.
54:that was present in
356:The Minsmere curlew
48:Druridge Bay curlew
539:on 8 December 2013
394:. You can help by
326:. You can help by
136:
95:
44:
41:Eurasian whimbrels
412:
411:
344:
343:
16:(Redirected from
602:
564:
555:
549:
548:
546:
544:
535:. Archived from
528:
407:
404:
386:
379:
339:
336:
318:
311:
21:
610:
609:
605:
604:
603:
601:
600:
599:
585:Numenius (bird)
570:
569:
568:
567:
556:
552:
542:
540:
530:
529:
525:
434:
417:
408:
402:
399:
392:needs expansion
358:
349:
340:
334:
331:
324:needs expansion
273:
171:
140:Eurasian curlew
134:Eurasian curlew
128:
80:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
608:
606:
598:
597:
592:
587:
582:
572:
571:
566:
565:
550:
522:
521:
520:
519:
512:
511:
504:
503:
492:
491:
484:
477:
466:
465:
456:
447:
433:
430:
429:
428:
423:
416:
415:External links
413:
410:
409:
389:
387:
357:
354:
348:
345:
342:
341:
321:
319:
272:
269:
268:
267:
263:
260:
257:
235:
234:
231:
224:
221:
194:
193:
190:
179:
170:
167:
163:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
127:
124:
103:Northumberland
91:Northumberland
79:
76:
60:Northumberland
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
607:
596:
593:
591:
588:
586:
583:
581:
578:
577:
575:
563:
561:
554:
551:
538:
534:
527:
524:
517:
516:
515:
509:
508:
507:
502:95(6):279-299
501:
500:British Birds
497:
496:
495:
489:
485:
482:
478:
475:
474:Birding World
471:
470:
469:
464:95(6):272-278
463:
462:
461:British Birds
457:
454:
453:
448:
446:11(5):181-191
445:
444:
443:Birding World
439:
438:
437:
431:
427:
424:
422:
419:
418:
414:
406:
397:
393:
390:This section
388:
385:
381:
380:
377:
374:
371:
367:
363:
362:RSPB Minsmere
355:
353:
346:
338:
329:
325:
322:This section
320:
317:
313:
312:
309:
306:
302:
298:
293:
291:
290:
289:British Birds
284:
282:
281:press release
278:
270:
264:
261:
258:
255:
254:
253:
251:
247:
246:Birding World
242:
240:
232:
229:
225:
222:
219:
218:
217:
215:
214:Birding World
210:
208:
207:
201:
200:
199:Birding World
196:In mid-June,
191:
188:
184:
180:
177:
176:
175:
168:
166:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
144:
143:
141:
132:
125:
123:
121:
120:
114:
110:
108:
104:
100:
92:
88:
84:
77:
75:
73:
69:
65:
61:
57:
53:
49:
42:
38:
34:
30:
19:
595:Birdwatching
558:
553:
541:. Retrieved
537:the original
531:BOU (2013).
526:
513:
505:
499:
493:
487:
480:
473:
467:
459:
450:
441:
435:
400:
396:adding to it
391:
375:
359:
350:
332:
328:adding to it
323:
294:
287:
285:
274:
249:
245:
243:
238:
236:
213:
211:
204:
197:
195:
172:
164:
137:
117:
115:
111:
96:
87:Druridge Bay
56:Druridge Bay
47:
45:
29:
228:supercilium
183:Merja Zerga
574:Categories
543:5 December
432:References
209:magazine.
562:124:56-57
560:Birdwatch
488:Birdwatch
481:Birdwatch
452:Birdwatch
403:June 2008
335:June 2008
250:Birdwatch
239:Birdwatch
206:Birdwatch
119:Birdwatch
78:Discovery
483:76:12-13
455:73:20-21
301:Minsmere
107:Tyneside
99:whimbrel
70:and the
370:Belgium
366:Suffolk
305:Suffolk
297:birding
187:Morocco
266:birds.
169:Debate
52:curlew
50:was a
490:77:12
545:2013
105:and
46:The
27:Bird
398:.
364:in
330:.
185:in
576::
303:,
89:,
58:,
547:.
405:)
401:(
337:)
333:(
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
