72:
Ms
Roberts claimed that her employer breached a duty of mutual trust and confidence. A Post Office supervisor, Mr OâKeefe, wrote on Ms Robertsâ personal records, without any basis, that she was irresponsible, lacked industry and comprehension skills, and this hindered her application for an office
81:
Talbot J held that the Post Office breached mutual trust and confidence by recording unfounded criticism of its employee. He said âWe do not think it helpfulâ to ask if the âbehaviour was deliberate or maliciousâ. It was only relevant that mutual trust and confidence is breached.
393:
111:
196:
104:
288:
454:
300:
128:
97:
326:
409:
250:
210:
240:
314:
182:
367:
224:
263:
154:
338:
168:
381:
357:
276:
343:
142:
266:
371:
304:
254:
186:
172:
228:
448:
420:
61:
399:
158:
132:
29:
89:
353:
237:
93:
43:
35:
25:
20:
198:Secretary of State for Employment v ASLEF (No 2)
64:case, concerning mutual trust and confidence.
395:Duncombe v SS for Children, Schools, Families
105:
8:
212:British Telecommunications plc v Ticehurst
112:
98:
90:
17:
7:
301:Henry v London Greater Transport Ltd
129:Wilsons and Clyde Coal Ltd v English
327:Cresswell v Board of Inland Revenue
289:Hollister v National Farmersâ Union
410:Employment contract in English law
14:
368:Cornwall County Council v Prater
251:Hall v Woolston Hall Leisure Ltd
455:United Kingdom labour case law
225:Nottingham University v Fishel
1:
315:Robertson v British Gas Corp
183:Mallone v BPB Industries plc
471:
264:Employment Rights Act 1996
155:Mahmud and Malik v BCCI SA
120:Construed employment terms
406:
390:
378:
364:
351:
339:Bateman v ASDA Stores Ltd
335:
323:
311:
297:
285:
273:
261:
247:
235:
221:
207:
193:
179:
165:
151:
139:
125:
57:The Post Office v Roberts
48:
21:The Post Office v Roberts
439:A Casebook on Labour Law
382:Ford v Warwickshire CC
169:Transco plc v O'Brien
49:Trust and confidence
277:Rigby v Ferodo Ltd
416:
415:
53:
52:
462:
396:
213:
199:
114:
107:
100:
91:
18:
470:
469:
465:
464:
463:
461:
460:
459:
445:
444:
434:
429:
417:
412:
402:
394:
386:
374:
360:
347:
331:
319:
307:
293:
281:
269:
257:
243:
231:
217:
211:
203:
197:
189:
175:
161:
147:
143:Wilson v Racher
135:
121:
118:
88:
79:
70:
12:
11:
5:
468:
466:
458:
457:
447:
446:
443:
442:
433:
430:
428:
425:
424:
423:
414:
413:
407:
404:
403:
391:
388:
387:
379:
376:
375:
365:
362:
361:
352:
349:
348:
336:
333:
332:
324:
321:
320:
312:
309:
308:
298:
295:
294:
286:
283:
282:
274:
271:
270:
262:
259:
258:
248:
245:
244:
236:
233:
232:
222:
219:
218:
208:
205:
204:
194:
191:
190:
180:
177:
176:
166:
163:
162:
152:
149:
148:
140:
137:
136:
126:
123:
122:
119:
117:
116:
109:
102:
94:
87:
84:
78:
75:
69:
66:
60:IRLR 347 is a
51:
50:
46:
45:
41:
40:
37:
33:
32:
27:
23:
22:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
467:
456:
453:
452:
450:
440:
437:E McGaughey,
436:
435:
431:
426:
422:
421:UK labour law
419:
418:
411:
405:
401:
398:
397:
389:
384:
383:
377:
373:
370:
369:
363:
359:
355:
350:
345:
341:
340:
334:
329:
328:
322:
317:
316:
310:
306:
303:
302:
296:
291:
290:
284:
279:
278:
272:
268:
265:
260:
256:
253:
252:
246:
242:
239:
234:
230:
227:
226:
220:
215:
214:
206:
201:
200:
192:
188:
185:
184:
178:
174:
171:
170:
164:
160:
157:
156:
150:
145:
144:
138:
134:
131:
130:
124:
115:
110:
108:
103:
101:
96:
95:
92:
85:
83:
76:
74:
67:
65:
63:
62:UK labour law
59:
58:
47:
42:
38:
34:
31:
28:
24:
19:
16:
438:
392:
380:
372:EWCA Civ 102
366:
337:
325:
313:
305:EWCA Civ 488
299:
287:
275:
255:EWCA Civ 170
249:
223:
209:
195:
187:EWCA Civ 126
181:
173:EWCA Civ 379
167:
153:
141:
127:
80:
71:
56:
55:
54:
15:
229:EWHC QB 221
441:(2019) 223
432:References
342:IRLR 370 (
73:transfer.
30:High Court
449:Category
354:ERA 1996
241:s 98A ff
238:ERA 1996
86:See also
77:Judgment
44:Keywords
39:IRLR 347
36:Citation
400:UKSC 14
385:ICR 273
358:210-212
330:ICR 508
318:ICR 351
292:ICR 542
216:ICR 383
159:UKHL 23
146:ICR 428
280:ICR 29
202:ICR 19
133:UKHL 2
427:Notes
68:Facts
26:Court
408:see
267:s 13
356:ss
344:EAT
451::
346:)
113:e
106:t
99:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.