73:
209:
145:. Under prior appropriation, water rights are acquired by making a beneficial use of water. Water rights that are acquired earlier are senior, and have priority over later, junior water rights during water shortages due to drought or over-appropriation. Generally, the priority date of water rights held by Native American tribes, also called
107:, who is associated with the invention of the English common law. Because common law is found to have a non-historical, "immemorial" advent, it is distinct from laws created by monarchs or legislative bodies on a fixed date. In English law, "time immemorial" has also been used to specify the time required to establish a
152:, is the date the tribe's reservation was established. However, courts occasionally find that the tribe's water rights carry a "time immemorial" priority date, the most senior date conceivable, for aboriginal uses of water on reserved land that overlaps with the tribe's aboriginal land. For example, in
123:
a New
Hampshire court found that a regular usage for twenty years, unexplained and uncontradicted, is sufficient to warrant a jury in finding the existence of an immemorial custom. More often than not, however, American courts identify common law without any reference to the phrase "time immemorial."
95:
describes this as "the watershed between a primarily oral culture and a world where writing was paramount". Common law is a body of law identified by judges in judicial proceedings, rather than created by the legislature. Judges determine the common law by pinpointing the legal principles
115:, which noted that the full expression was "time immemorial, or time whereof the memory of man runneth not to the contrary," replaced the burden of proving "time immemorial" for the enjoyment of particular land rights with statutory fixed time periods of up to 60 years.
173:, the land rights Native Americans possess over the lands they have continuously and exclusively occupied for a long time prior to the intrusion of other occupants, plaintiff tribes and courts sometimes describe their occupancy as dating back to "time immemorial."
160:
necessarily had water rights with a priority date of "time immemorial" because they had lived and used the waters in
Central Oregon and Northern California for more than a thousand uninterrupted years prior to entering a treaty with the United States in 1864.
118:
American law inherited the
English common law tradition. Unlike English law, American law does not set "time immemorial," and American courts vary in their demands to establish "immemoriality" for the purposes of common law. In
533:
193:
in 1964, oral traditional evidence has received increased judicial endorsement. In affirming the use of Native
American oral traditional evidence to establish title to land, the
60:, time immemorial denotes "a period of time beyond which legal memory cannot go," and "time out of mind." Most frequently, the phrase "time immemorial" appears as a
481:
554:
609:
374:
190:
619:
429:
83:
in 1189, from a 13th-century chronicle. Any time before the accession of
Richard I is considered "time immemorial" in English law.
142:
138:
48:, "ancient beyond memory or record". The phrase is used in legally significant contexts as well as in common parlance.
629:
356:
72:
64:
in judicial discussion of common law development and, in the United States, the property rights of Native
Americans.
327:
Home Sweet Home: How the 'Purpose of the
Reservation' Affects More than Just the Quantity of Indian Water Rights,"
288:
272:
197:
court described the testimony as having been handed down between tribal council members from "time immemorial."
528:
146:
108:
326:
76:
536:
112:
560:
614:
104:
242:
577:
Native
American Oral Traditional Evidence in American Courts: Reliable Evidence or Useless Myth?
503:
87:"Time immemorial" is frequently used to describe the time required for a custom to mature into
370:
343:
Indian Title: The Rights of
American Natives in Lands They Have Occupied Since Time Immemorial
103:
In
English law, time immemorial ends and legal memory begins at 1189, the end of the reign of
80:
61:
412:
557:
484:
392:
362:
170:
37:
355:
Barber, Richard (2022), "Marlborough Castle in the Middle Ages", in Barber, Richard (ed.),
185:
evidence, oral histories shared between past and present generations, in court. Since the
576:
539:
182:
157:
92:
25:
624:
603:
310:
232:
487:
222:
208:
141:
holders. In the western United States, water rights are administered under the
552:
Narragansett Tribe of Indians v. Southern Rhode Island Land Development Corp.,
366:
254:
237:
214:
204:
181:
Historically, American judges lacked confidence in the use of Native American
88:
342:
311:"Law "In" and "As" History: The Common Law in the American Polity, 1790-1900
227:
97:
41:
591:
45:
461:
248:
137:"Time Immemorial" is sometimes used to describe the priority date of
33:
445:
71:
57:
32:) is a phrase meaning time extending beyond the reach of
361:(1 ed.), Boydell and Brewer Limited, p. 62,
430:
Judicial Legitimacy- Judith and Marc Joseph Lecture
329:23 Colo. J. Int'l Envtl. L. & Pol'y 201, 206.
16:Legal phrase denoting before memory or record
8:
313:," 1 UC Irvine L. Rev. 587, 594-600 (2011).
79:being anointed during his coronation in
345:," 75 Columbia L. Rev. 655, 656 (1975).
265:
432:," 49 Rutgers L. Rev. 859, 875 (1997).
579:," 118 Dick. L. Rev. 697, 711 (2014).
571:
569:
498:
496:
474:
472:
470:
191:United States Court of Federal Claims
7:
407:
405:
387:
385:
337:
335:
321:
319:
305:
303:
301:
299:
297:
14:
508:LII / Legal Information Institute
393:A Primer on the Civil-Law System
207:
143:doctrine of prior appropriation
68:English and American common law
504:"Prior appropriation doctrine"
1:
610:Common law legal terminology
156:the court reasoned that the
100:over a long period of time.
96:consistently reiterated in
648:
275:(1971 ed.), Vol. I, p. 63c
620:English legal terminology
367:10.1017/9781787446748.005
273:Oxford English Dictionary
169:When claiming or finding
399:. Retrieved 18 May 2022.
341:Daniel G. Kelly, Jr., "
177:Oral tradition evidence
77:Richard I the Lionheart
589:Pueblo de Zia v. U.S.,
419:Retrieved 18 May 2022.
289:Black’s Law Dictionary
84:
29:
413:Prescription Act 1832
358:The Marlborough Mound
128:US federal Indian law
113:Prescription Act 1832
91:. Medieval historian
75:
592:165 Ct. Cl. 501, 504
428:Robert N. Wilentz, "
98:previous legal cases
460:143 N.W. 505, 507 (
417:legislation.gov.uk.
630:Time in government
458:Kimple v. Schafer,
243:Royal lives clause
109:prescriptive right
85:
376:978-1-78744-674-8
325:Jessica Lowrey, "
309:Kunal M. Parker,
81:Westminster Abbey
62:legal term of art
637:
595:
586:
580:
573:
564:
563:(1st Cir. 1996).
549:
543:
525:
519:
518:
516:
514:
500:
491:
490:(9th Cir. 1983).
476:
465:
455:
449:
439:
433:
426:
420:
409:
400:
389:
380:
379:
352:
346:
339:
330:
323:
314:
307:
292:
291:(11th ed. 2019).
282:
276:
270:
217:
212:
211:
189:decision of the
183:oral traditional
171:aboriginal title
165:Aboriginal title
647:
646:
640:
639:
638:
636:
635:
634:
600:
599:
598:
587:
583:
574:
567:
550:
546:
529:Winters v. U.S.
526:
522:
512:
510:
502:
501:
494:
477:
468:
456:
452:
442:Knowles v. Dow,
440:
436:
427:
423:
410:
403:
390:
383:
377:
354:
353:
349:
340:
333:
324:
317:
308:
295:
285:Time Immemorial
283:
279:
271:
267:
263:
213:
206:
203:
179:
167:
135:
130:
121:Knowles v. Dow,
70:
54:
44:, indefinitely
30:Ab immemorabili
22:Time immemorial
17:
12:
11:
5:
645:
644:
641:
633:
632:
627:
622:
617:
612:
602:
601:
597:
596:
581:
575:Rachel Awan, "
565:
544:
520:
492:
479:U.S. v. Adair,
466:
450:
434:
421:
401:
391:James Apple, "
381:
375:
347:
331:
315:
293:
277:
264:
262:
259:
258:
257:
252:
245:
240:
235:
230:
225:
219:
218:
202:
199:
178:
175:
166:
163:
154:U.S. v. Adair,
134:
131:
129:
126:
93:Richard Barber
69:
66:
53:
50:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
643:
642:
631:
628:
626:
623:
621:
618:
616:
613:
611:
608:
607:
605:
593:
590:
585:
582:
578:
572:
570:
566:
562:
559:
556:
553:
548:
545:
541:
538:
535:
532:
530:
524:
521:
509:
505:
499:
497:
493:
489:
486:
483:
480:
475:
473:
471:
467:
463:
462:Iowa 161 659/
459:
454:
451:
447:
443:
438:
435:
431:
425:
422:
418:
414:
408:
406:
402:
398:
394:
388:
386:
382:
378:
372:
368:
364:
360:
359:
351:
348:
344:
338:
336:
332:
328:
322:
320:
316:
312:
306:
304:
302:
300:
298:
294:
290:
286:
281:
278:
274:
269:
266:
260:
256:
253:
251:
250:
246:
244:
241:
239:
236:
234:
233:Legal fiction
231:
229:
226:
224:
221:
220:
216:
210:
205:
200:
198:
196:
195:Pueblo de Zia
192:
188:
187:Pueblo de Zia
184:
176:
174:
172:
164:
162:
159:
158:Klamath Tribe
155:
151:
149:
144:
140:
132:
127:
125:
122:
116:
114:
110:
106:
105:King Henry II
101:
99:
94:
90:
82:
78:
74:
67:
65:
63:
59:
51:
49:
47:
43:
39:
35:
31:
27:
23:
19:
588:
584:
551:
547:
540:564, 567-578
527:
523:
511:. Retrieved
507:
478:
457:
453:
441:
437:
424:
416:
396:
357:
350:
284:
280:
268:
247:
223:Acquiescence
194:
186:
180:
168:
153:
147:
139:water rights
136:
133:Water rights
120:
117:
102:
86:
55:
21:
20:
18:
615:English law
604:Categories
488:1394, 1414
261:References
255:Usucaption
238:Prehistory
215:Law portal
89:common law
228:Dreamtime
42:tradition
561:908, 914
446:387, 409
444:22 N.H.
201:See also
594:(1964).
542:(1908).
448:(1851).
397:fjc.gov
148:Winters
46:ancient
513:14 May
373:
249:Uradel
150:rights
111:. The
52:In law
38:record
34:memory
40:, or
26:Latin
625:Past
558:F.3d
537:U.S.
515:2022
485:F.2d
371:ISBN
534:207
482:723
415:,"
363:doi
58:law
56:In
606::
568:^
555:89
506:.
495:^
469:^
464:).
404:^
395:"
384:^
369:,
334:^
318:^
296:^
287:,
36:,
28::
531:,
517:.
411:"
365::
24:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
