Knowledge (XXG)

Utilitarian bioethics

Source ๐Ÿ“

246:. Utilitarian bioethicists argue that cost-effective analysis is the most effective tool in distributing and utilizing resources so to maximize the best possible outcome with the idea that the outcome would lead to a benefit or increased happiness for society. One example of cost-effective analysis in regard to health care is the concept of quality-adjusted life years or QALY. QALY is a measure of benefit from treating or allocating resources to individuals based on the comparison of each individuals alternative outcome. Although there is controversy in regard to the equality of persons in this concept, equality should be regarded as a separate issue, because if one uses a standard of measurement that produces the same amount of qalys for each individual, as proposed by G.W. Torrance one of the economist credited to the creation of the concept, then there is unfairness when we consider different age groups, with the elderly getting a lower amount of qalys. 275:. Section 166.046, Subsection (e) of the law states physicians have the right to refuse any intervention they deem as inappropriate. Utilitarian ethics would allow for such a decision given that if there is no benefit from the intervention, than resources as being used ineffectively and therefore effecting others in society, decreasing overall happiness. Some argue that the law is inherently flawed, in that what some physicians find futile-care, others might not agree. And even more, some argue that the very law itself demeans the value and dignity of human life. There have also been cases where the physicians who determined that treatment being done was futile-care were actually not so, which lead to possibly avoidable death. Given its criticisms, many applaud TADA for its groundbreaking development into medical policy and see it as a step forward to better health care. 221:
necessary practices as a means to maximize total well-being, and the arguably controversial research and medical practices are good and beneficial to all people. Many who argue for the morality of utilitarian principles in research and medical areas point to our already accepted model of disaster triage, inherently utilitarian, which seeks to do the greatest amount of good for the greatest number of people by foregoing treatment of those in critical conditions for those who have a higher chance to recover and those that can be quickly cared for to then help in the care effort.
230: 250:
alternative choices and their cost-effective ratio, but adds and additional element to the equation which is called the diplomatic value. This added element to resource allocation takes into account the future diplomatic and political effects of a decision, which shows how choices can have a future improvement and be more advantageous in the long run, though less cost-effective in the outset.
25: 296:, that of beneficence and non-maleficence, and that the physician should care for the infant with the best of their ability. Proponents of the protocol argue that if there is unanimous agreement for the euthanizing of the neonate among those who are in the best position to make that decision, the parents and physicians, then euthanizing is in severe cases is a good and not immoral. 135:
Utilitarian bioethics deals with whether or not decisions of biology or medicine are good based on the Greatest Happiness principle, and thus any action or decision that leads to happiness for the greatest number of people is good. Many see problems with the morality of utilitarian bioethics, citing
291:
sought to provide an ethical framework to allow for euthanasia of infants with severe medical diagnosis and prognosis. Many believe that the protocol cannot be followed because the criteria of the protocol cannot be met by neonates, namely the quality-of-life and pain and suffering criteria. Those
249:
Some this method of resource allocation as mechanical and devoid of human emotion, and argue for an augmented form of cost-effective analysis which seeks to correct this, called the Kevany Riposte. The Kevany Riposte is similar to the traditional cost-effective analysis method in that it compares
216:
Those against utilitarian principles in research, health care, or bio-medical fields suggest that the means to achieve an overall benefit for society is not justified and becomes immoral, and anyone who is part of the act or who is involved in it being allowed is complicit in its immorality. They
220:
Those in favor of utilitarian principles in research, health-care, or bio-medical fields seek advancements in these areas for the benefit of all people and the collective happiness as a species. They view, what those who are against utilitarian ethics would suggest as immoral acts, as good and
241:
game, and therefore medical decisions should logically be made on the basis of each person's total future productive value and happiness, their chance of survival from the present, and the resources required for treatment. One way to grasp an effective way to distribute resources is by
253:
For many resource allocation decisions, those involving the most rare and severe cases, medical culture and society are at odds and the choice of where to distribute resources will inevitably cause some ethical offense.
262:
Though not the principle moral framework for guiding laws, utilitarian ethics can be seen in a number of different areas of state and federal laws, especially those involving resource distribution and health policies.
286:
has been legal for sometime, albeit not for infants. However, neonatal euthanasia still occurs in the Netherlands with a general tolerance by society and no physicians or associated parties going to trial. The
233:
The image shows children having fun, relating to quality of life. QALY is a measurement of how many quality years of life someone is expected to experience due to a particular choice from a number of choices.
132:
to directing practices and resources where they will have the most usefulness and highest likelihood to produce happiness, in regards to medicine, health, and medical or biological research.
217:
argue that utilitarianism fails to join itself with common morality, and thus the cannot be accepted as a moral, and any application of utilitarian principles are unethical.
436: 144:(TADA) and euthanasia in the Netherlands as advancements in modern health care, while dissenting views argue of its devaluing of individual human life. 42: 518: 625: 569:
Lamb, Emmet J. (2004). "Rationing of Medical Care: Rules of Rescue, Cost-Effectiveness, and the Oregon Plan: Presidential Address".
367: 108: 89: 61: 837: 176:, advanced utilitarian ethics further in the 1990s and 2000s. A few applications of the utilitarian bioethics in policy are the 136:
moral dilemmas in medical research and triage for example. Still, proponents for utilitarian bioethics look toward models like
68: 46: 283: 271:
In 1999, with the passing of the TADA, Texas became the first state to have a law on the books that deals directly with
141: 75: 243: 137: 57: 35: 613: 357: 408: 958: 185: 534:
Wagner, Jacqueline M. (2015). "Nursing Ethics and Disaster Triage: Applying Utilitarian Ethical Theory".
173: 311: 750:
Kapottos, Michael; Youngner, Stuart (2015). "The Texas Advanced Directive Law: Unfinished Business".
907:
Tedesco, Matthew (2017). "Dutch Protocols for Deliberately Ending the Life of Newborns: A Defence".
331: 272: 229: 82: 963: 932: 775: 483: 288: 177: 924: 889: 813: 767: 732: 714: 675: 621: 594: 586: 551: 514: 475: 363: 152:
Although utilitarian philosophy traces itself back to the nineteenth century British thinkers
916: 879: 871: 805: 759: 722: 706: 665: 657: 578: 543: 506: 467: 200: 165: 153: 316: 192: 510: 160:, the application of utilitarianism in contemporary bioethics originated in the work of 884: 859: 727: 694: 670: 645: 383: 321: 169: 157: 129: 237:
Utilitarian bioethics is based on the premise that the distribution of resources is a
952: 191:
In the 1990s, backlash against utilitarian bioethics emerged, led by such figures as
936: 875: 779: 487: 326: 164:
in the 1970s and 1980s. A second generation of utilitarian bioethicists, including
161: 763: 293: 196: 181: 24: 582: 920: 547: 471: 817: 718: 590: 796:
Capone, Ralph A.; Grimstad, Julie (2014). "Futile-Care Theory in Practice".
661: 125: 928: 893: 771: 679: 598: 555: 479: 809: 736: 238: 437:"Complicity and Stem Cell Research: Countering the Utilitarian Argument" 710: 458:
Strong, Carson (2006). "The Limited Utility of Utilitarian Analysis".
501:
Savulescu, Julian; Birks, David (2012). "Bioethics: Utilitarianism".
362:. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. p. 19. 306: 228: 16:
Branch of bioethics that incorporates principles of utilitarianism
18: 421:
Colon, Alicia. "When Killing An Ill Infant 'Is Not Wrong,
620:. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. 646:"Diplomacy and Health: The End of the Utilitarian Era" 650:
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
838:"Euthanasia of Newborns and the Groningen Protocol" 49:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 203:was also critical of the utilitarian perspective. 279:The Groningen Protocol and Neonatal Euthanasia 860:"Neonatal Euthanasia: The Groningen Protocol" 571:American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 292:against the protocol believe in the value of 8: 644:Kevany, Sebastian; Matthews, Marcus (2017). 435:Sullivan, Dennis; Costerisan, Aaron (2008). 406:Harris, Kathy. One Door Away From Heaven', 883: 726: 669: 109:Learn how and when to remove this message 343: 853: 851: 831: 829: 827: 798:National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 791: 789: 639: 637: 140:(QALY) and medical policies like the 7: 447:(3): 151โ€“158, 131 – via EBSCO. 351: 349: 347: 47:adding citations to reliable sources 695:"The Ethics of Resource Allocation" 511:10.1002/9780470015902.a0005891.pub2 14: 752:The American Journal of Bioethics 460:The American Journal of Bioethics 836:Debois, B.; Zeegers, J. (2015). 128:that incorporates principles of 23: 876:10.1179/0024363914Z.00000000086 858:Vizcarrondo, Felipe E. (2014). 842:European Institute of Bioethics 34:needs additional citations for 1: 909:Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 764:10.1080/15265161.2015.1047998 536:Journal of Emergency Medicine 284:Euthanasia in the Netherlands 142:Texas Advanced Directives Act 138:quality-adjusted life years 980: 583:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.02.054 921:10.1007/s11673-017-9772-2 699:Journal of Medical Ethics 693:Boyd, Kenneth M. (1983). 548:10.1016/j.jen.2014.11.001 472:10.1080/15265160600686141 384:"Definition of BIOETHICS" 409:Fort Worth Star-Telegram 124:refers to the branch of 662:10.15171/IJHPM.2016.155 618:Ethics out of Economics 388:www.merriam-webster.com 359:Ethics out of Economics 244:cost-effective analysis 58:"Utilitarian bioethics" 234: 186:Advance Directives Act 864:The Linacre Quarterly 810:10.5840/ncbq201414465 612:Broome, John (1999). 441:Ethics & Medicine 356:Broome, John (1999). 312:Cost-utility analysis 232: 225:Resource distribution 122:Utilitarian bioethics 267:TADA and Futile Care 43:improve this article 332:Socialized medicine 273:futile medical care 174:Thaddeus Mason Pope 711:10.1136/jme.9.1.25 425:, December 3, 2004 289:Groningen Protocol 235: 178:Groningen Protocol 119: 118: 111: 93: 971: 941: 940: 904: 898: 897: 887: 855: 846: 845: 833: 822: 821: 793: 784: 783: 747: 741: 740: 730: 690: 684: 683: 673: 641: 632: 631: 609: 603: 602: 577:(6): 1636โ€“1641. 566: 560: 559: 531: 525: 524: 498: 492: 491: 455: 449: 448: 432: 426: 423:The New York Sun 419: 413: 404: 398: 397: 395: 394: 380: 374: 373: 353: 201:Bernard Williams 166:Julian Savulescu 154:John Stuart Mill 114: 107: 103: 100: 94: 92: 51: 27: 19: 979: 978: 974: 973: 972: 970: 969: 968: 949: 948: 946: 944: 906: 905: 901: 857: 856: 849: 835: 834: 825: 795: 794: 787: 749: 748: 744: 692: 691: 687: 643: 642: 635: 628: 611: 610: 606: 568: 567: 563: 533: 532: 528: 521: 500: 499: 495: 457: 456: 452: 434: 433: 429: 420: 416: 405: 401: 392: 390: 382: 381: 377: 370: 355: 354: 345: 341: 336: 317:Ezekiel Emanuel 302: 281: 269: 260: 227: 214: 209: 193:Wesley J. Smith 150: 115: 104: 98: 95: 52: 50: 40: 28: 17: 12: 11: 5: 977: 975: 967: 966: 961: 959:Utilitarianism 951: 950: 943: 942: 915:(2): 251โ€“259. 899: 870:(4): 388โ€“392. 847: 823: 804:(4): 619โ€“624. 785: 742: 685: 656:(4): 191โ€“194. 633: 626: 604: 561: 542:(4): 300โ€“306. 526: 520:978-0470016176 519: 493: 450: 427: 414: 412:, Feb 14, 2002 399: 375: 368: 342: 340: 337: 335: 334: 329: 324: 322:Medical ethics 319: 314: 309: 303: 301: 298: 280: 277: 268: 265: 259: 256: 226: 223: 213: 210: 208: 205: 199:. Philosopher 170:Jacob M. Appel 158:Jeremy Bentham 149: 146: 130:utilitarianism 117: 116: 31: 29: 22: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 976: 965: 962: 960: 957: 956: 954: 947: 938: 934: 930: 926: 922: 918: 914: 910: 903: 900: 895: 891: 886: 881: 877: 873: 869: 865: 861: 854: 852: 848: 843: 839: 832: 830: 828: 824: 819: 815: 811: 807: 803: 799: 792: 790: 786: 781: 777: 773: 769: 765: 761: 757: 753: 746: 743: 738: 734: 729: 724: 720: 716: 712: 708: 704: 700: 696: 689: 686: 681: 677: 672: 667: 663: 659: 655: 651: 647: 640: 638: 634: 629: 627:0-511-03657-4 623: 619: 615: 608: 605: 600: 596: 592: 588: 584: 580: 576: 572: 565: 562: 557: 553: 549: 545: 541: 537: 530: 527: 522: 516: 512: 508: 504: 497: 494: 489: 485: 481: 477: 473: 469: 465: 461: 454: 451: 446: 442: 438: 431: 428: 424: 418: 415: 411: 410: 403: 400: 389: 385: 379: 376: 371: 369:0-511-03657-4 365: 361: 360: 352: 350: 348: 344: 338: 333: 330: 328: 325: 323: 320: 318: 315: 313: 310: 308: 305: 304: 299: 297: 295: 290: 285: 278: 276: 274: 266: 264: 257: 255: 251: 247: 245: 240: 231: 224: 222: 218: 211: 207:Related areas 206: 204: 202: 198: 195:and novelist 194: 189: 187: 183: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 155: 147: 145: 143: 139: 133: 131: 127: 123: 113: 110: 102: 91: 88: 84: 81: 77: 74: 70: 67: 63: 60: โ€“  59: 55: 54:Find sources: 48: 44: 38: 37: 32:This article 30: 26: 21: 20: 945: 912: 908: 902: 867: 863: 841: 801: 797: 758:(8): 34โ€“38. 755: 751: 745: 705:(1): 25โ€“27. 702: 698: 688: 653: 649: 617: 607: 574: 570: 564: 539: 535: 529: 502: 496: 466:(3): 65โ€“67. 463: 459: 453: 444: 440: 430: 422: 417: 407: 402: 391:. Retrieved 387: 378: 358: 327:Peter Singer 282: 270: 261: 252: 248: 236: 219: 215: 190: 162:Peter Singer 151: 134: 121: 120: 105: 96: 86: 79: 72: 65: 53: 41:Please help 36:verification 33: 294:principlism 197:Dean Koontz 182:Netherlands 953:Categories 393:2019-05-01 339:References 188:in Texas. 99:March 2017 69:newspapers 964:Bioethics 818:1532-5490 719:0306-6800 591:0002-9378 126:bioethics 937:13782975 929:28220355 894:25473136 780:41691307 772:26225515 680:28812802 599:15284761 556:25510208 488:13156908 480:16754461 300:See also 239:zero-sum 212:Morality 184:and the 885:4240050 737:6834399 728:1060847 671:5384981 180:in the 148:History 83:scholar 935:  927:  892:  882:  816:  778:  770:  735:  725:  717:  678:  668:  624:  614:"QALY" 597:  589:  554:  517:  486:  478:  366:  307:Baby K 258:Policy 85:  78:  71:  64:  56:  933:S2CID 776:S2CID 484:S2CID 90:JSTOR 76:books 925:PMID 890:PMID 814:ISSN 768:PMID 733:PMID 715:ISSN 676:PMID 622:ISBN 595:PMID 587:ISSN 552:PMID 515:ISBN 476:PMID 364:ISBN 172:and 156:and 62:news 917:doi 880:PMC 872:doi 806:doi 760:doi 723:PMC 707:doi 666:PMC 658:doi 579:doi 575:190 544:doi 507:doi 503:eLS 468:doi 45:by 955:: 931:. 923:. 913:14 911:. 888:. 878:. 868:81 866:. 862:. 850:^ 840:. 826:^ 812:. 802:14 800:. 788:^ 774:. 766:. 756:15 754:. 731:. 721:. 713:. 701:. 697:. 674:. 664:. 652:. 648:. 636:^ 616:. 593:. 585:. 573:. 550:. 540:41 538:. 513:. 505:. 482:. 474:. 462:. 445:24 443:. 439:. 386:. 346:^ 168:, 939:. 919:: 896:. 874:: 844:. 820:. 808:: 782:. 762:: 739:. 709:: 703:9 682:. 660:: 654:6 630:. 601:. 581:: 558:. 546:: 523:. 509:: 490:. 470:: 464:6 396:. 372:. 112:) 106:( 101:) 97:( 87:ยท 80:ยท 73:ยท 66:ยท 39:.

Index


verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Utilitarian bioethics"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
bioethics
utilitarianism
quality-adjusted life years
Texas Advanced Directives Act
John Stuart Mill
Jeremy Bentham
Peter Singer
Julian Savulescu
Jacob M. Appel
Thaddeus Mason Pope
Groningen Protocol
Netherlands
Advance Directives Act
Wesley J. Smith
Dean Koontz
Bernard Williams

zero-sum
cost-effective analysis

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

โ†‘