Knowledge

United States v. Guest

Source 📝

31: 117:
If a state participates in a conspiracy to infringe an individuals rights, the state has violated the Fourteenth Amendment. The state's participation in the conspiracy can be as minimal as possible, so long as the involvement exists the state has erred. Furthermore, there is a constitutional right to
327:
The argument revolved around whether or not Congress intended to apply equal protection rights of the 14th Amendment to citizens deprived of said rights on public facilities, such as roads and bridges or interstate commerce facilities, by private actors with the collusion of public actors. In this
276:
While the majority avoided the question of whether Congress, by appropriate legislation, has the power to punish private conspiracies, Justice Clark, writing in concurrence, asserted that "there now can be no doubt that the specific language of §5 empowers the Congress to enact laws punishing all
363:
Brennan wrote: "(I) believe that §241 reaches such a private conspiracy, not because the 14th Amendment of its own force prohibits such a conspiracy, but because §241, as an exercise of congressional power under §5 of that Amendment, prohibits all conspiracies to interfere with the exercise of a
324:. The federal indictment in question arose after the acquittal. In District Court, the six defendants successfully "moved to dismiss the indictment on the ground that it did not charge an offense under the laws of the United States," according to the case. The Supreme Court reversed. 457: 472: 337: 266: 236: 269:
to citizens who suffer rights deprivations at the hands of private conspiracies, where there is minimal state participation in the conspiracy. The Court also held that there is a
410: 373: 254: 72: 336:
The question was whether or not 18 U.S.C. §241 of the Criminal Code could be applied to protect the rights of equal protection and due process secured by the
462: 467: 328:
case, "public actors" were considered the police who responded to the murderers' false reports that Penn and his cohorts had committed crimes.
309:. He was traveling north in a car with two other black Reserve officers when he was shot and killed on a bridge, just nine days after the 306: 35: 161: 270: 310: 240: 100: 349: 317: 430: 262: 165: 414: 64: 202:
Stewart, joined by Black, Clark, White, Fortas; Harlan (in part); Warren, Douglas, Brennan (in part)
277:
conspiracies - with or without state action - that interfere with 14th Amendment rights." Justice
357: 149: 302: 298: 258: 421: 321: 173: 451: 153: 67: 353: 294: 177: 133: 282: 278: 185: 141: 79: 104: 97: 439: 320:, and the alleged killers were charged but acquitted there by an 301:
reserve officer who was returning from active duty training to
30: 386:
Belknap, Michal R. (1982). "The Legal Legacy of Lemuel Penn".
458:
United States Fourteenth Amendment, section five case law
338:
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
473:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court
374:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 383
265:, in which the court extended the protection of the 230: 222: 214: 206: 198: 193: 122: 111: 92: 87: 59: 49: 42: 23: 8: 305:, where he was Assistant Superintendent of 20: 360:concurred in part and dissented in part. 364:'right (secured) by the Constitution.'" 293:The case arose out of the killing of 273:right to travel from state to state. 18:1966 United States Supreme Court case 7: 226:Brennan, joined by Warren, Douglas 36:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 463:United States Supreme Court cases 417:745 (1966) is available from: 340:. The Court held that it could. 29: 307:Washington, D.C. public schools 468:1966 in United States case law 210:Clark, joined by Black, Fortas 1: 253:, 383 U.S. 745 (1966), was a 107:1964) (reversed and remanded) 285:joined Clark's concurrence. 489: 440:Oyez (oral argument audio) 235: 127: 116: 28: 311:Civil Rights Act of 1964 241:Civil Rights Act of 1964 318:Madison County, Georgia 316:The murder happened in 43:Argued November 9, 1965 407:United States v. Guest 263:Justice Potter Stewart 250:United States v. Guest 237:U.S. Const. amend. XIV 166:William J. Brennan Jr. 54:United States v. Guest 45:Decided March 28, 1966 24:United States v. Guest 344:Concurrence/dissents 332:Opinion of the Court 431:Library of Congress 78:86 S. Ct. 1170; 16 388:Howard Law Journal 358:William O. Douglas 150:William O. Douglas 138:Associate Justices 255:landmark decision 246: 245: 162:John M. Harlan II 480: 444: 438: 435: 429: 426: 420: 395: 352:, Chief Justice 303:Washington, D.C. 299:African-American 259:US Supreme Court 123:Court membership 33: 32: 21: 488: 487: 483: 482: 481: 479: 478: 477: 448: 447: 442: 436: 433: 427: 424: 418: 402: 385: 382: 380:Further reading 370: 350:William Brennan 346: 334: 291: 176: 164: 152: 83: 44: 38: 19: 12: 11: 5: 486: 484: 476: 475: 470: 465: 460: 450: 449: 446: 445: 401: 400:External links 398: 397: 396: 381: 378: 377: 376: 369: 366: 345: 342: 333: 330: 322:all-white jury 290: 287: 271:Constitutional 267:14th Amendment 244: 243: 233: 232: 228: 227: 224: 223:Concur/dissent 220: 219: 216: 215:Concur/dissent 212: 211: 208: 204: 203: 200: 196: 195: 191: 190: 189: 188: 174:Potter Stewart 139: 136: 131: 125: 124: 120: 119: 114: 113: 109: 108: 94: 90: 89: 85: 84: 77: 61: 57: 56: 51: 50:Full case name 47: 46: 40: 39: 34: 26: 25: 17: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 485: 474: 471: 469: 466: 464: 461: 459: 456: 455: 453: 441: 432: 423: 416: 412: 408: 404: 403: 399: 393: 389: 384: 383: 379: 375: 372: 371: 367: 365: 361: 359: 355: 351: 343: 341: 339: 331: 329: 325: 323: 319: 314: 312: 308: 304: 300: 296: 288: 286: 284: 280: 274: 272: 268: 264: 260: 256: 252: 251: 242: 238: 234: 229: 225: 221: 217: 213: 209: 205: 201: 197: 194:Case opinions 192: 187: 183: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 140: 137: 135: 132: 130:Chief Justice 129: 128: 126: 121: 115: 110: 106: 102: 99: 95: 91: 86: 81: 75: 74: 69: 66: 62: 58: 55: 52: 48: 41: 37: 27: 22: 16: 406: 391: 387: 362: 356:and Justice 347: 335: 326: 315: 292: 281:and Justice 275: 261:authored by 249: 248: 247: 231:Laws applied 181: 169: 157: 154:Tom C. Clark 145: 88:Case history 71: 53: 15: 354:Earl Warren 295:Lemuel Penn 207:Concurrence 178:Byron White 134:Earl Warren 452:Categories 394:: 457–524. 289:Background 283:Abe Fortas 279:Hugo Black 186:Abe Fortas 142:Hugo Black 80:L. Ed. 2d 60:Citations 405:Text of 368:See also 348:Justice 313:passed. 199:Majority 105:M.D. Ga. 98:F. Supp. 257:of the 118:travel. 112:Holding 443:  437:  434:  428:  425:  422:Justia 419:  218:Harlan 184: 182:· 180:  172: 170:· 168:  160: 158:· 156:  148: 146:· 144:  413: 297:, an 93:Prior 415:U.S. 96:246 73:more 65:U.S. 63:383 411:383 101:475 82:239 68:745 454:: 409:, 392:25 390:. 239:; 103:( 76:) 70:(

Index

Supreme Court of the United States
U.S.
745
more
L. Ed. 2d
F. Supp.
475
M.D. Ga.
Earl Warren
Hugo Black
William O. Douglas
Tom C. Clark
John M. Harlan II
William J. Brennan Jr.
Potter Stewart
Byron White
Abe Fortas
U.S. Const. amend. XIV
Civil Rights Act of 1964
landmark decision
US Supreme Court
Justice Potter Stewart
14th Amendment
Constitutional
Hugo Black
Abe Fortas
Lemuel Penn
African-American
Washington, D.C.
Washington, D.C. public schools

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.