Knowledge (XXG)

United States v. Lara

Source 📝

873:
sovereignty a "nullity." Thomas did not believe that Congress has the constitutional authority to set the "metes and bounds of tribal sovereignty." He noted that such authority was not in the Indian Treaty Clause nor the Indian Commerce Clause. "In view, the tribes either are or are not separate sovereigns, and our federal Indian law cases untenably hold both positions simultaneously." Thomas further questioned the law ending the practice of making treaties with the tribes, noting that this was the one clear constitutional provision that provides for dealing with other sovereigns. Thomas noted that a delegation of prosecutorial power is always to an executive branch and that the tribes are not part of any executive branch of the Federal government. Therefore, the case hinges on the tribes' inherent sovereignty, and based on precedent, the tribes possess that power.
741: 31: 569:, with Magistrate Judge Alice R. Senechal sitting by consent, denied the motions and Lara entered a conditional guilty plea, reserving the right to appeal. Senechal noted that two other trial courts in the circuit had already ruled that double jeopardy did not apply, that the ICRA only recognized the inherent sovereignty of the tribes and did not delegate prosecutorial power to the tribe. She further noted that another circuit court had ruled the same way. Lara also argued that the 822: 586:, arguing that the Tribal Court obtained its authority from the ICRA, an act of Congress, and that both the Tribal Court and the Federal Court derived their power from the same sovereign. A three-judge panel of the Circuit Court affirmed the decision of the District Court, holding that the tribe derived its power from its own retained sovereignty that was separate from the sovereignty of the United States. The Eighth Circuit's panel noted that in the 413: 368: 882: 1129:
Lara brought up the constitutional issues of double jeopardy ("or shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb ..."), selective prosecution,("or deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.") and due process ("or be
590:
decision, the Supreme Court had observed that Congress could address the jurisdictional system, which Congress did. When Congress amended the ICRA, they were addressing a federal common law issue, not a constitutional issue, and were within their authority to recognize the sovereignty of the tribes.
768:
granted Congress "plenary and exclusive" power to legislate in respect to the Indian tribes. He noted that the Indian Treaty Clause did not specifically grant Congress the right to legislate, but that treaties made pursuant to the clause could grant Congress the authority to legislate in regards to
708:
to support his argument. He stated that it was the place of the Supreme Court, not Congress, to determine the inherent sovereignty of the tribe. Lara argued that since the tribe had no such inherent sovereignty, it could only prosecute a non-member Indian based upon federal sovereignty, which would
609:
allowed prosecution by two separate sovereigns, such as the federal government and a state government, it found that an Indian tribe derived its authority to prosecute offenders from the ICRA, which was federal law. The court noted that in previous Supreme Court rulings, the determination of tribal
573:
doctrine, if applied, would preclude his prosecution, and that since it was never applied to federal prosecutions following convictions in tribal court, it discriminated against Indians. Senechal denied this motion, noting that Lara had shown no examples of other races not being prosecuted for like
1143:
doctrine requires the U.S. Attorney to determine that: 1) there is a substantial federal interest; 2) that the other prosecution left that interest unvindicated; and 3) the same test is applied to all federal prosecutions. Finally, the approval of the appropriate Assistant Attorney General is also
1039:
tribe), and the Two Kettles bands. This group speaks the Lakota dialect of the Sioux language. The Dakota, sometimes known as the Western Dakota, consist of the Yankton and Yanktonai bands, which speak the Western Dakota dialect of the Sioux language. The Santee, or Eastern Dakota, consist of the
756:
delivered the opinion of the court on April 19, 2004. Breyer believed that the question the Court needed to answer was whether Congress had the authority to relax restrictions that had been imposed on an Indian tribe's inherent sovereignty. He noted that the intent of Congress was clear, not only
399:
or Ojibwe people were also from the same general area. The two tribes had been at war from at least 1736 and by 1750 the Chippewa had forced the Santee to the west into the prairie. The war between the tribes continued until at least the 1850s. Only after 1862, when the Santee rose up against the
872:
wrote a concurring opinion stating that it was time to re-examine the entire concept of tribal sovereignty. He noted that doubtful precedents stated that Congress, and not another part of the government had the power to regulate everything that a tribe could or could not do, which renders tribal
855:
wrote a concurrence which stated that Congress was very careful to base the changes to the statute on inherent tribal powers and not on a delegation of authority. Kennedy states that is all that is needed to decide the case, but that the Court went further than was necessary when it decided that
808:
Breyer noted Lara's other arguments, but as the double jeopardy issue was dispositive, he declined to address those issues. He did note that "we are not now faced with a question dealing with potential constitutional limits on congressional efforts to legislate far more radical changes in tribal
929:
Souter wrote that this dissonance in court decisions will lead to confusion, stating: "And confusion, I fear, will be the legacy of today's decision, for our failure to stand by what we have previously said reveals that our conceptualizations of sovereignty and dependent sovereignty are largely
564:
Following his arrest, the tribal court of the Spirit Lake Sioux Tribe charged Lara with assaulting the arresting officers, along with four other charges. Lara pleaded guilty to the tribal charge of "violence to a policeman". Soon after, federal prosecutors charged Lara with assault on a federal
1003:
The case has been widely covered in books and news media. Tribal court authority has been altered by the U.S. government for decades, affecting jurisdictional powers. In Justice Thomas's conclusion at the end of this case, he stated, "History points in both directions." Thomas further stated,
543:. Lara had married a member of the Spirit Lake Santee tribe and had resided on the Spirit Lake Reservation with her and their children until he was banished from the reservation due to several serious misdemeanors. Lara returned to the reservation, where he was arrested and charged with 709:
make a subsequent Federal prosecution a violation of the prohibition of double jeopardy. It was noted that members of Indian tribes were at the same time United States citizens, and protected under the constitution in the same manner as any other citizen. Reichert stated that
656:
decision clearly stated that a tribe could prosecute a tribal member for a crime and that the Federal government could subsequently prosecute for the same criminal acts without invoking double jeopardy if the actions of the accused violated Federal law. Olson noted that the
842:
that argued that the Indian tribes have a stronger claim on inherent sovereign powers than do individual states. He noted that the Indian tribes governed themselves since before Columbus arrived, and that most states never governed themselves outside of the United States.
967:
Indians are very integrated across tribal boundaries, intermarrying across tribes and sharing child and medical care services across tribes. Lara was an example of this; he married a Spirit Lake Sioux woman and moved to that reservation before his exclusion by the
551:(BIA) officer Bryon Swan took Lara to the police station where Lara was informed of a Sioux order excluding him from the reservation. Lara then struck Swan, who as a BIA officer was considered both a tribal officer and a federal law enforcement officer. 693:
Alexander F. Reichert was appointed by the Supreme Court to argue the case for Lara. Reichert argued that an Indian tribe had no inherent sovereignty in regards to non-member Indians, but only the power that Congress decided to give the tribe, citing
4396: 713:
was decided as a constitutional issue, not as a matter of common law, and it was the Court's place to determine the issue, not the place of Congress. To subject Lara to a prosecution by a tribal court, which was not subject to the
921:
was even more specific as to that point. Souter believed that the only two ways that the tribes could regain their sovereignty would be for Congress to declare that they were independent of the United States, as it did with the
604:
by the full court. The request was granted, and the full court reversed the decision of the three-judge panel, ordering that the federal indictment be dismissed on the grounds of double jeopardy. While the court noted that the
5231: 796:
dealt with cases where Congress had restricted a tribe's inherent powers but pointed at nothing in the Constitution or established precedent that prohibits Congress from relaxing such restrictions. The decision in
334:
that an Indian tribe did not have the authority to try an Indian criminally who was not a member of that tribe. The following year, Congress passed a law that stated that Indian tribes, because of their inherent
4259: 5241: 4069: 978:
because tribes could act even in the presence of related federal activity. They noted that Lara had been in numerous altercations with the tribal police at Spirit Lake for intoxication, spousal abuse, and
4359: 4175: 1258: 805:, and it is clear that Congress has the power to change that law. Since the power exercised by the Spirit Lake Sioux Tribe was that of inherent tribal sovereignty, double jeopardy did not attach. 917:
held that the tribes had lost their inherent sovereignty, the only way for the tribes to regain jurisdiction over non-member Indians would be by the delegation of that jurisdiction by Congress.
462:
the Supreme Court found that the federal government did not have jurisdiction to try the case. Crow Dog was ordered released, having made restitution under tribal law to Spotted Tail's family.
3950: 1270: 1372:
Breyer noted the many shifts in federal Indian policy, from removal to self-determination, the last of which substantially relaxed prior restrictions that Congress had placed on the tribes.
354:
against the federal charges. The Supreme Court ruled that double jeopardy did not apply to Lara since "the successive prosecutions were brought by separate and distinct sovereign bodies".
1322: 5226: 4211: 856:
Congress had the power under the constitution to authorize tribes to prosecute non-member Indians. Finally, Kennedy was concerned that the court did not address the question of the
4247: 3494: 3116: 2451: 2334: 1737: 1712: 1567: 1430: 610:
jurisdiction was based on the tribal membership of the individual, not on his race as an Indian. This meant that double jeopardy attached. The United States then appealed to the
298: 72: 3327: 4022: 3902: 1179: 772:
These powers included the ability to both restrict tribal powers or to relax such restrictions. Congress has done both, such as in the withdrawal of federal recognition of the
566: 665:
fix bill clearly indicated that Congress intended to restore, not delegate, authority to prosecute non-member Indians by a tribe. The government argued that the limitation in
4223: 3878: 1262: 305:(Indian) tribe could prosecute an Indian for the same acts that constituted crimes in both jurisdictions. The Court held that the United States and the tribe were separate 971:"As 'domestic dependent nations,' Indian tribes possess criminal jurisdiction in Indian Country that is 'complete, inherent, and exclusive,' except as limited by Congress." 4438: 606: 5211: 4429: 4234: 3974: 3738: 1402:"United States v Lara: Affirmation of Tribal Criminal Jurisdiction Over Nonmember American Indians. In: Michigan Bar Journal from July 2004, pages 24-27, here page 24" 725: 673:
has allowed prosecution of non-member Indians for centuries, until it was limited by Congress. The United States was supported by amicus briefs filed by the State of
1401: 4441: 4300: 990:
by affirming the ability of Congress to relax or to restrict tribal powers. The opinion of Justice Thomas was especially telling in this, as Thomas had opined that
3854: 669:
was a statutory limitation of the tribe's sovereignty, not a constitutional limit, and that Congress had the authority to remove that limitation. He noted that a
1035:
The Lakota, also known as Teton Sioux, consist of the Brulé, Oglala, Sans Arc, Hunkpapa, Miniconjou, Sihasapa (or Blackfoot Sioux, not to be confused with the
404:, did the fighting cease. In 1872, the Sisseton and Wahpeton bands of the Santee signed a treaty that resulted in their moving to the Spirit Lake Reservation. 4264: 4239: 3958: 583: 1004:"Federal Indian policy, is, to say the least, schizophrenic." Thomas's statements directly address the Supreme Court's confusion on both present and future 3304:
Symposium: Tribal Sovereignty and United States v. Lara: Another Such Victory and We are Undone: A Call to an American Indian Declaration of Independence,
1182:
had held there was no federal delegation of power, and thus no double jeopardy, while the Eighth Circuit had held the opposite and it was double jeopardy.
5236: 3894: 3550: 813:
bodies had filed the charges, double jeopardy did not apply to Lara's case. The decision of the Eighth Circuit Court was reversed in the 7–2 decision.
430:
Originally, crimes committed by Indians against Indians were not subject to federal or state jurisdiction, but were handled by tribal law. In 1881, a
1318: 3998: 528: 515:(ICRA) to recognize that Indian tribes had inherent power to exercise criminal jurisdiction over all Indians. This legislation became known as the " 732:, Idaho, (along with several other counties), the Citizen's Equal Rights Foundation, and T. Morris, E. Morris, and R. Morris (individual Indians). 5206: 4384: 1017: 670: 647: 336: 5216: 565:
officer and a federal grand jury indicted him. Lara moved to dismiss the charge based on double jeopardy and other constitutional grounds. The
481:
over certain Indian-on-Indian crimes when the crimes were committed in "Indian country." In 1886, the Act was upheld by the Supreme Court in
4910: 4280: 4205: 4181: 3751: 3438: 3416: 682: 302: 4422: 3862: 3731: 1111:
Lara was also charged with resisting lawful arrest, trespass, disobedience to a lawful order of the tribal court, and public intoxication.
951:
Lara was released from federal prison on August 19, 2005, about a year and four months after the Supreme Court delivered their decision.
4169: 3830: 1286: 4389: 4217: 3337: 3324: 3042: 2734: 2705: 2446: 2021: 1812: 1683: 1667: 1651: 1619: 704: 611: 540: 295: 277: 35: 4455: 4339: 3934: 3798: 3287:
Symposium: Tribal Sovereignty and United States v. Lara: Lara, Lawrence, Supreme Court Litigation, and Lessons From Social Movements
1381:
Thomas questioned the constitutionality of this act, noting that the power to make treaties rested with the President, not Congress.
5059: 4655: 3886: 3664: 4835: 4415: 3724: 3034: 2726: 2697: 2329: 1804: 1800: 1611: 652: 636: 4323: 3926: 4722: 4157: 1405: 4859: 4792: 4556: 4344: 4199: 4038: 3747: 3638: 1356: 1080:
The crimes covered were murder, manslaughter, rape, assault with intent to commit murder, arson, burglary, and larceny.
715: 3232:
American-Indian Law: United States v. Lara: Affirmation of Tribal Criminal Jurisdiction Over Nonmember American Indians
4599: 4354: 4139: 740: 595:
claim. Judge Hansen dissented, believing that the tribe drew its authority to try Lara from the federal government.
450:. Crow Dog was tried in federal court for murder, found guilty, and sentenced to hang. He petitioned for a writ of 5147: 5075: 4484: 3774: 3586: 1040:
Mdewakantonwan, Wahpeton, Sisseton, and Wahpekute bands, speaking the Eastern Dakota dialect of the Sioux language.
765: 269: 1998:
Broken Landscape:Indians, Indian Tribes, and the Constitution: Indians, Indian Tribes, and the Constitution 251-52
4959: 4623: 4500: 4133: 4060: 3918: 3677: 3215: 1360: 1306: 781: 777: 1089:
Indian country was defined as all reservation land, all dependent Indian communities, and all Indian allotments.
339:, had the authority to try non-member Indians for crimes committed within the tribe's territorial jurisdiction. 5067: 4926: 4285: 4187: 4163: 3990: 3573: 3111: 1266: 905: 548: 140: 4875: 3562: 5115: 4971: 3690: 5107: 4867: 4811: 4757: 4690: 4682: 4615: 4516: 4407: 4334: 4145: 2170: 1941: 1707: 1068: 899: 857: 536: 512: 483: 443: 343: 112: 4607: 3541: 2246: 2178: 1949: 1067:
The federal government has exclusive jurisdiction as regards the states, however, the Indian tribes retain
122: 5091: 5035: 4741: 4714: 4706: 4639: 4580: 4572: 4537: 4349: 4252: 4127: 4006: 3910: 3846: 3806: 1099: 1098:
The Duro case involved the slaying of a 14-year-old on the reservation by an Indian of another tribe. The
478: 470: 317: 310: 174: 983:. Only when the tribe ran out of options did it issue an exclusion order to bar him from the reservation. 5139: 5011: 4979: 4749: 4468: 4097: 3790: 3651: 3498: 3120: 2455: 2338: 1889:
Like a Loaded Weapon: The Rehnquist Court, Indian Rights, And the Legal History of Racism in America 154
1741: 1716: 1571: 1434: 1314: 1005: 64: 4995: 1008:. As Justice Souter stated in his dissent, this remains "an area peculiarly susceptible to confusion." 4902: 4773: 3782: 3514: 897:. Souter referenced prior cases dealing with sovereignty and jurisdiction, from the decision made in 273: 2083:
Tribal Criminal Jurisdiction After U.S. v. Lara: Answering Constitutional Challenges to the Duro Fix
1337:
held that a tribe had no authority to a non-Indian for an offense against an Indian on tribal lands.
1158: 5131: 5099: 5051: 5043: 5003: 4819: 4663: 4290: 3766: 1987:
Trapped in a Tangled Web United States v. Lara: The Trouble with Tribes and the Sovereignty Debacle
1102:
declined to prosecute, so the tribe prosecuted Duro for the tribal offense of discharging a weapon.
729: 658: 544: 202: 3716: 3523: 5083: 5019: 4987: 4934: 4918: 4508: 4329: 4310: 4115: 4103: 4091: 4085: 4052: 3703: 3612: 3472: 1302: 1298: 1282: 1162: 987: 975: 839: 674: 347: 718:, would deprive Lara of his rights as a United States citizen. Lara's position was supported by 5123: 4827: 4765: 4647: 4305: 4030: 3942: 3814: 3464: 3434: 3412: 3382: 1562: 835: 458: 425: 342:
The defendant, Billy Jo Lara, was charged for acts that were criminal offenses under both the
166: 158: 507:
to try an Indian of another tribe. Tribal leaders urged Congress to fix the problem that the
5171: 5027: 4894: 4843: 3456: 2585:
Redefining the Status of Indian Tribes within Our Federalism: Beyond the Dependency Paradigm
1310: 1058:
The restitution consisted of $ 600 (or $ 50 in one source), eight ponies, and one blanket.
980: 474: 421: 401: 321: 3599: 5221: 5163: 4698: 4631: 4564: 4317: 4046: 3966: 3870: 3838: 3331: 1294: 1154: 869: 852: 821: 761: 351: 198: 186: 139:
and the United States are separate sovereigns, prosecuting a crime under both tribal and
3625: 3505: 2856: 1404:. Department Digital Commons at Michigan State University College of Law. Archived from 5155: 4492: 4374: 4151: 3822: 3532: 3427: 3405: 3123: 2458: 2341: 2025: 1744: 1719: 1574: 1437: 894: 753: 639: 388: 384: 210: 178: 1400:
Matthew L. M. Fletcher ( Michigan State University College of Law) (January 1, 2004).
860:. He would have reversed the Eighth Circuit without going into the additional detail. 5200: 5179: 4476: 4379: 4364: 3982: 2902:, 541 U.S. at 211–12 (Kennedy concurring); David M. Schraver & David H. Tennant, 1732: 1290: 1175: 991: 720: 519:
fix", and was based on tribal sovereignty rather than a federal delegation of power.
499: 452: 396: 380: 330: 281: 2521:
The Extent of Indian Regulatory Authority over Non-Indians: South Dakota v. Bourland
4193: 2862: 1274: 1241: 890: 757:
based on the plain language of the statute, but also from its legislative history.
650:
to enforce its criminal laws against Indians of other tribes. Olson noted that the
532: 504: 447: 439: 412: 376: 190: 136: 4397:
United States Congressional Joint Special Committee on Conditions of Indian Tribes
1820: 1816: 1687: 1671: 1655: 1623: 67: 3369:
America is Indian Country: Opinions and Perspectives from Indian Country Today 90
2738: 2713: 2709: 4295: 3046: 1637:
Returning Washington P.L. 280 Jurisdiction to its Original Consent-Based Grounds
923: 367: 306: 2932:, at 52 (noting that Lara should have raised these issues in the tribal court). 1174:
At least in part, it appears that the Supreme Court took the case to resolve a
4369: 1212: 1196: 1130:
deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law ...").
960: 926:, or for the Court to overturn the concept of a dependent domestic sovereign. 802: 615: 83: 3468: 2984:, 541 U.S. at 215 (Thomas concurring) (internal citations omitted); Skibine, 4121: 4109: 1278: 1233: 1036: 910: 810: 809:
status." The decision allowed both courts to prosecute Lara. Since separate
773: 392: 79: 3279:
Symposium: Tribal Sovereignty and United States v. Lara: Symposium Foreward
1761:
Supreme Court Interpretation and Policymaking in American Indian Policy 176
930:
rhetorical." Souter concluded that he would stand by the decisions made in
371:
1892 Map of Spirit Lake Reservation, then known as Devil's Lake Reservation
309:; therefore, separate tribal and federal prosecutions did not violate the 1237: 1204: 1200: 435: 431: 3476: 1850:
United States v. Lara, Indian Tribes, and the Dialectic of Incorporation
881: 3038: 2968:, 541 U.S. at 215 (Thomas concurring); Schraver, at 138 n.23; Skibine, 2730: 2701: 1615: 1229: 1208: 1192: 600: 1808: 1692:
Heeding the Demands of Justice: Justice Blackmun's Indian Law Opinions
3460: 1216: 325: 2133:, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20182 at *3-4 (internal citations omitted). 784:
to restore tribal recognition and powers. The earlier decisions in
909:. Souter stated that the decision in this case did not align with 880: 820: 739: 678: 411: 366: 4070:
List of United States Supreme Court cases involving Indian tribes
1861:
Tribal, State, and Federal Cooperation to Achieve Good Governance
1049:
The reservation was originally known as Devil's Lake Reservation.
825:
Justice Clarence Thomas, author of one of the concurring opinions
324:, divesting tribes of criminal jurisdiction in regard to several 105:, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20182 (D.N.D. 2001). 3640:
Brief Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Eighteen American Indian Tribes
3325:
Ode to Billy Jo, The Supreme Court's latest look into Indian law
3218: 1245: 4957: 4535: 4453: 4411: 3720: 30: 2956:, 541 U.S. at 214 (Thomas concurring); Schraver, at 156 n.127. 2725:
Menominee Restoration Act of 1973, December 22, 1973, 87 
1259:
Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Nation
1120:
Lara was sentenced to 90 days in jail for the tribal offense.
963:
articles since the decision was made. Points raised include:
391:
in the east. In the east, the Santee was originally from the
5232:
United States Native American criminal jurisdiction case law
3692:
Brief Amicus Curiae of the Citizen's Equal Rights Foundation
3627:
Brief of Amicus Curiae National Congress of American Indians
3601:
Brief for the State of Washington, et al., as Amicus Curiae
477:
in 1885. The Act provided that the federal government had
3951:
County of Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York State
3383:
1 Punch, 2 Prosecutions, No Double Jeopardy, Justices Rule
3365:
Justice Thomas and Federal Indian Law – Hitting His Stride
2696:
Menominee Termination Act of 1954, June 17, 1954, 58 
3447:
Reichert, Alexander (2004), "Counsel for Billy Jo Lara",
582:
Lara appealed the denial of his motion to dismiss to the
350:. Lara pleaded guilty to the tribal charges, but claimed 5242:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
3666:
Amicus Brief of Nat'l Assoc. of Criminal Defense Lawyers
1323:
Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation
893:
wrote a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justice
227:
Breyer, joined by Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Ginsburg
4212:
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act
4176:
Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act
2427:
Formalism and Judicial Supremacy in Federal Indian Law
2253:, 541 U.S. 193 (2004) (hereinafter cited as Lara II). 1595:
George Washington Kingsbury & George Martin Smith
744:
Justice Stephen Breyer wrote the majority opinion in
539:
is approximately 90 miles (140 km) south of the
4023:
City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York
3903:
Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. County of Oneida
2928:, 541 U.S. at 212–13 (Kennedy concurring); Skibine, 2590:
667, 678 (2005–2006) (hereinafter cited as Skibine,
2432:
391, 397 (2007–2008) (hereinafter cited as Skibine,
2185:, 541 U.S. 193 (2004) (hereinafter cited as Lara I). 4886: 4803: 4784: 4733: 4674: 4591: 4548: 4273: 4233: 4224:
Cherokee Nation Truth in Advertising for Native Art
4078: 3879:
Federal Power Commission v. Tuscarora Indian Nation
3758: 1263:
Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation
263: 255: 247: 239: 231: 223: 218: 147: 129: 96: 91: 59: 49: 42: 23: 3679:Brief of Lewis Cnty., Idaho, et al., Amicus Curiae 3426: 3404: 1346:Indian tribes are not bound by the Bill of Rights. 885:Justice David Souter, author of dissenting opinion 3614:Brief Amicus Curiae of the State of Idaho, et al. 3221:: Billy Jo Lara #08061-059. Viewed July 27, 2014. 1610:Major Crimes Act of 1835, March 3, 1885, 23  3975:Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield 3190:, 541 U.S. at 230 (Souter dissenting); Skibine, 3150:, 541 U.S. at 227 (Souter dissenting); Skibine, 3061:, 541 U.S. at 218 (Thomas concurring); Skibine, 2544:Br. of Nat'l Assoc. of Criminal Defense Lawyers. 726:National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers 511:decision created. In 1991, Congress amended the 4301:Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples 3705:Brief Amicus Curiae of Thomas Lee Morris, et al 994:and tribal sovereignty were mutually exclusive. 591:The panel then affirmed the trial court on the 3855:United States v. Santa Fe Pacific Railroad Co. 2765:, 541 U.S. at 205; Burleson, at 210; Skibine, 1855:47 (2004–2005) (hereinafter cited as Skibine, 646:decision, acted to "recognize and affirm" the 5227:United States Double Jeopardy Clause case law 4423: 3732: 328:crimes. In 1990, the Supreme Court ruled in 301:which held that both the United States and a 8: 3959:South Carolina v. Catawba Indian Tribe, Inc. 3371:(Jose Barreiro & Tim Johnson eds. 2004). 1936:, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20182 (D.N.D. 2001) 527:Billy Jo Lara was an enrolled member of the 400:whites and were subsequently removed to the 3407:American Indian Law in a Nutshell (3rd ed.) 2583:, 541 U.S. at 196; Alex Tallchief Skibine, 2233:, 294 F.3d at 1007–10. (Hansen dissenting). 1873:Introduction to Tribal Legal Studies 159-60 1599:2 History of the Dakota Territory 1192–1196 1550:2 Indian Affairs: Laws and Treaties 1057–58 959:This case has been the subject of numerous 4954: 4545: 4532: 4450: 4430: 4416: 4408: 3895:McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax Commission 3739: 3725: 3717: 2878:, 541 U.S. at 210–11 (Stevens concurring). 20: 3302:Lara, 541 U.S. at 193; William Bradford, 3138:, 541 U.S. at 226–27 (Souter dissenting). 1319:Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community 642:argued that Congress, in response to the 2904:Indian Tribal Sovereignty–Current Issues 2562:Br. of the Citizen's Equal Rights Found. 1498:Culture and Customs of the Sioux Indians 529:Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians 5212:Native American history of North Dakota 4248:Federal recognition of Native Hawaiians 3411:, St. Paul, MN: West Group Publishing, 2944:, 541 U.S. at 214 (Kennedy concurring). 2890:, 541 U.S. at 211 (Kennedy concurring). 1392: 1355:The counties were Lewis County, Idaho, 1028: 1018:Tribal sovereignty in the United States 3206:, 541 U.S. at 230 (Souter dissenting). 3178:, 541 U.S. at 229 (Souter dissenting). 3166:, 541 U.S. at 227 (Souter dissenting). 3089:, 541 U.S. at 216 (Thomas concurring). 3077:, 541 U.S. at 215 (Thomas concurring). 3024:, 541 U.S. at 215 (Thomas concurring). 2145:, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20182 at *3-4. 1869:Justin Blake Richland & Sarah Deer 4911:Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber 4182:American Indian Religious Freedom Act 3999:Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho 3752:Native Americans in the United States 3253:American Indian Law in a Nutshell 168 913:established in previous cases. Since 683:National Congress of American Indians 677:and seven other states, the State of 18:2004 United States Supreme Court case 7: 3863:Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States 2157:, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20182 at *4. 2121:, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20182 at *3. 2109:, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20182 at *1. 1976:, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20182 at *1. 1490:The Chippewas of Lake Superior 36-37 4170:Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act 3831:Seneca Nation of Indians v. Christy 1287:Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians 497:In 1990, the Supreme Court held in 3653:Brief of Respondent, Billy Jo Lara 3561:, January 21, 2004, archived from 2912:133, 138-39 (2011–2012); Skibine, 2447:Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe 2407:Br. of Nat'l Cong. of Am. Indians. 2319:Br. of United States 11-12, 17-18. 1918:Battleground: Criminal Justice 781 1458:American Indians and the Law 48-49 1440: (2004) (hereinafter cited as 705:Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe 541:Turtle Mountain Indian Reservation 503:that an Indian tribe did not have 379:consist of three main groups, the 36:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 5237:United States Supreme Court cases 4340:National Indian Gaming Commission 3935:Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe 3799:New York ex rel. Cutler v. Dibble 3588:Reply Brief for the United States 3501:193 (2004) is available from: 3309:(2004); Batzer, at 283; Skibine, 535:near the Canada–U.S. border. The 4656:Bravo-Fernandez v. United States 3887:Menominee Tribe v. United States 2794:Lara, 541 U.S. at 210; Skibine, 598:Lara then requested a rehearing 438:shot and killed another Indian, 143:does not attach double jeopardy. 29: 4094:(1790,1793,1796,1799,1802,1834) 2866:(accessed on January 13, 2013). 2814:, 541 U.S. at 207–09; Skibine, 2289:, 255 F.3d 662 (9th Cir. 2003). 2072:amends. V, XIV; Batzer, at 295. 1960:, 324 F.3d 635 (8th Cir. 2003) 1801:Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968 1321:, Spirit Lake Sioux Tribe, and 584:Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals 5207:2004 in United States case law 4324:In the Courts of the Conqueror 3927:Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez 3403:Canby, William C. Jr. (1998), 3033:Act of March 3, 1871, 16  2526:(1993–1994); Burleson, at 215. 2380:Br. of United States 31 n. 11. 1552:(Charles J. Kappler ed. 1904). 1474:Tribes of the Sioux Nation 5-9 685:, and eighteen Indian tribes. 54:United States v. Billy Jo Lara 1: 5217:Native American tribal police 4439:United States Fifth Amendment 4206:Native American Languages Act 3552:Transcript of Oral Argument, 2524:27 Creighton L. Rev. 605, 613 1690:et seq.; Allison M. Dussias, 974:The decision enhanced tribal 648:Indian tribe's inherent power 456:to the Supreme Court, and in 294:, 541 U.S. 193 (2004), was a 4860:Puerto Rico v. Sanchez Valle 4793:Blockburger v. United States 4557:Blockburger v. United States 4345:Native American civil rights 4200:Indian Gaming Regulatory Act 4039:Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl 3429:American Indians and the Law 2830:, 541 U.S. at 205; Skibine, 2781:, 541 U.S. at 207; Skibine, 2658:, 541 U.S. at 201; Skibine, 2630:, 541 U.S. at 200; Skibine, 1865:40 Akron L. Rev. 207, 209-10 1191:The states were Washington, 1153:The panel consisted of C.J. 4600:United States v. Randenbush 4360:Recognition of sacred sites 4355:Native American Rights Fund 4260:Federally recognized tribes 4140:Oklahoma Indian Welfare Act 3575:Brief for the United States 3433:, New York: Penguin Group, 3285:(2004); Kevin K. Washburn, 2798:, at 51; Burleson, at 210; 2683:Burleson, at 210; Skibine, 2488:Br. of Lara 8-12; Skibine, 2371:Br. of United States 23-26. 2362:Br. of United States 18-19. 2353:Br. of United States 15-16. 1283:Metlakatla Indian Community 681:and five other states, the 296:United States Supreme Court 5258: 5148:J. D. B. v. North Carolina 5076:Dickerson v. United States 4485:Wong Wing v. United States 4218:Indian Arts and Crafts Act 3775:Cherokee Nation v. Georgia 3449:American Indian Law Review 2553:Br. of Lewis Cnty., Idaho. 2249:(8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) 1956:, 541 U.S. 193 (2004) and 1803:, April 11, 1968, 82  766:United States Constitution 419: 115: (8th Cir. 2002). 5060:Mitchell v. United States 4966: 4960:Self-Incrimination Clause 4953: 4804:Dual sovereignty doctrine 4624:Fong Foo v. United States 4549:Meaning of "same offense" 4544: 4531: 4501:United States v. Moreland 4463: 4449: 4134:Indian Reorganization Act 4061:Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta 3919:United States v. Antelope 3216:Federal Bureau of Prisons 1695:71 N.D. L. Rev. 41, 87-88 1640:47 Gonz. L. Rev. 663, 678 1307:Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma 1271:Lac Courte Oreilles Tribe 903:, to the opinion made in 782:Menominee Restoration Act 778:Menominee Termination Act 268: 152: 134: 125: (8th Cir. 2003). 28: 5068:United States v. Hubbell 4927:North Carolina v. Pearce 4876:Denezpi v. United States 4836:United States v. Wheeler 4286:Bureau of Indian Affairs 4188:Indian Child Welfare Act 3991:South Dakota v. Bourland 3425:Duthu, N. Bruce (2008), 3112:South Dakota v. Bourland 2425:Alex Tallchief Skibine, 2330:United States v. Wheeler 1990:8 Chap. L. Rev. 283, 294 1848:Alex Tallchief Skibine, 1811:(codified as amended at 1618:(codified as amended as 1267:Eastern Band of Cherokee 906:South Dakota v. Bourland 653:United States v. Wheeler 549:Bureau of Indian Affairs 346:'s laws and the federal 259:Souter, joined by Scalia 5116:Corley v. United States 5108:United States v. Patane 4972:Curcio v. United States 4868:Gamble v. United States 4758:United States v. Dinitz 4691:Ludwig v. Massachusetts 4683:United States v. Wilson 4616:Burton v. United States 4517:United States v. Cotton 4335:Long Walk of the Navajo 4265:State recognized tribes 4164:Indian Civil Rights Act 3230:Matthew L.M. Fletcher, 2416:Br. of Eighteen Tribes. 1708:United States v. Kagama 1591:A Sioux Chronicle 46-66 1486:Edmund J. Danziger, Jr. 1228:The states were Idaho, 1069:concurrent jurisdiction 942:Subsequent developments 900:United States v. Kagama 858:Equal Protection Clause 760:Breyer stated that the 537:Spirit Lake Reservation 513:Indian Civil Rights Act 484:United States v. Kagama 444:Great Sioux Reservation 387:in the center, and the 344:Spirit Lake Sioux Tribe 270:U.S. Const. Art. II, §2 43:Argued January 21, 2004 5092:Yarborough v. Alvarado 4812:United States v. Lanza 4742:United States v. Perez 4723:Smith v. United States 4715:United States v. Dixon 4707:United States v. Felix 4640:Burks v. United States 4581:United States v. Dixon 4573:United States v. Felix 4538:Double Jeopardy Clause 4350:Native American gaming 4253:Legal status of Hawaii 4128:Indian Citizenship Act 4007:Idaho v. United States 3911:Bryan v. Itasca County 3847:Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock 3807:Standing Bear v. Crook 2310:Lara, 541 U.S. at 193. 1964:, 541 U.S. 193 (2004). 1859:; Elizabeth Burleson, 1100:United States Attorney 886: 826: 762:Indian Commerce Clause 749: 567:Federal District Court 479:exclusive jurisdiction 417: 372: 311:Double Jeopardy Clause 45:Decided April 19, 2004 5140:Berghuis v. Thompkins 4980:Griffin v. California 4852:United States v. Lara 4750:United States v. Jorn 4608:Ball v. United States 4469:Hurtado v. California 4158:Indian Relocation Act 4015:United States v. Lara 3791:Fellows v. Blacksmith 3554:United States v. Lara 3491:United States v. Lara 3330:June 7, 2015, at the 3249:William C. Canby, Jr. 2857:United States v. Lara 2674:, 541 U.S. at 202-03. 2430:32 Am. Indian L. Rev. 2301:, 541 U.S. at 198-99. 2287:United States v. Enas 2265:, 324 F.3d at 637-38. 2243:United States v. Lara 2167:United States v. Lara 1985:MacKenzie T. Batzer, 1934:United States v. Lara 1427:United States v. Lara 1315:Pueblo of Santa Clara 1006:Federal Indian Policy 986:The decision limited 884: 824: 743: 415: 370: 291:United States v. Lara 243:Kennedy (in judgment) 118:United States v. Lara 113:294 F.3d 1004 108:United States v. Lara 102:United States v. Lara 78:124 S. Ct. 1628; 158 24:United States v. Lara 5036:Doe v. United States 4903:Palko v. Connecticut 4774:Blueford v. Arkansas 3783:Worcester v. Georgia 3568:on February 16, 2017 3338:Indian Country Today 3000:Art. II, § 2, cl. 2. 2646:Art. II, § 2, cl. 2. 2175:on rehearing en banc 1946:on rehearing en banc 1408:on September 1, 2015 1257:The tribes were the 736:Opinion of the Court 724:briefs filed by the 547:. After the arrest, 531:located in northern 274:U.S. Const. amend. V 251:Thomas (in judgment) 123:324 F.3d 635 5132:Maryland v. Shatzer 5100:Missouri v. Seibert 5052:McNeil v. Wisconsin 5044:Illinois v. Perkins 5004:Williams v. Florida 4820:Bartkus v. Illinois 4785:Multiple punishment 4664:McElrath v. Georgia 4330:Indian reservations 4291:Cherokee Commission 3767:Johnson v. McIntosh 3698:, December 15, 2003 3685:, December 15, 2003 3672:, December 15, 2003 3659:, December 13, 2003 3646:, November 14, 2003 3633:, November 14, 2003 3607:, December 14, 2003 3542:Library of Congress 3307:40 Tulsa L. Rev. 71 3291:40 Tulsa L. Rev. 25 3012:Art. I, § 8, cl. 3. 2618:Art. I, § 8, cl. 3. 2519:Veronica L. Brown, 2221:, 294 F.3d at 1007. 2209:, 294 F.3d at 1006. 2197:, 294 F.3d at 1006. 2087:93 Cal. L. Rev. 847 1775:, 495 U.S. at 694; 1757:John Harlan Vinzant 1635:M. Brent Leonhard, 1071:for these offenses. 801:was one of federal 671:tribe's sovereignty 659:legislative history 545:public intoxication 203:Ruth Bader Ginsburg 175:Sandra Day O'Connor 5084:Chavez v. Martinez 5020:Edwards v. Arizona 5012:Michigan v. Tucker 4988:Miranda v. Arizona 4935:Benton v. Maryland 4919:Baxstrom v. Herold 4509:Beck v. Washington 4442:criminal procedure 4390:Self-determination 4385:Tribal sovereignty 4311:Eagle-bone whistle 4104:Indian Removal Act 4092:Nonintercourse Act 4086:Blood quantum laws 4053:McGirt v. Oklahoma 3283:40 Tulsa L. Rev. 1 3277:Melissa L. Tatum, 3236:83 Mich. Bar J. 24 3101:, 118 U.S. at 375. 2753:, 541 U.S. at 203. 2606:, 541 U.S. at 199. 2535:Br. of Lara 21-22. 2510:Br. of Lara 19-21. 2501:Br. of Lara 13-15. 2389:Br. of Washington. 2277:, 324 F.3d at 641. 1994:Frank Pommererheim 1885:Robert A. Williams 1516:, at xvi-xvii, 15. 1303:Pascua Yaqui Tribe 1299:Oglala Sioux Tribe 1163:Pasco M. Bowman II 988:tribal sovereignty 976:self-determination 887: 840:concurring opinion 827: 750: 618:to hear the case. 555:Procedural history 418: 373: 348:United States Code 163:Associate Justices 5194: 5193: 5190: 5189: 5124:Florida v. Powell 4996:Boulden v. Holman 4949: 4948: 4945: 4944: 4828:Waller v. Florida 4766:Oregon v. Kennedy 4648:Evans v. Michigan 4527: 4526: 4405: 4404: 4306:Eagle feather law 4240:State recognition 4031:Cobell v. Salazar 3943:Solem v. Bartlett 3815:Ex parte Crow Dog 3440:978-0-670-01857-4 3418:978-0-314-14640-3 3390:, April 19, 2004. 3247:Fletcher, at 24; 2089:(2005); Skibine, 1563:Ex parte Crow Dog 1494:Gregory O. Gagnon 1359:, Minnesota, and 1357:Mille Lacs County 836:John Paul Stevens 780:in 1954, and the 637:Solicitor General 467:Ex Parte Crow Dog 459:Ex parte Crow Dog 426:Ex Parte Crow Dog 383:in the west, the 287: 286: 159:William Rehnquist 5249: 5172:Salinas v. Texas 5028:Oregon v. Elstad 4955: 4895:Ex parte Bigelow 4844:Heath v. Alabama 4675:After conviction 4546: 4533: 4451: 4432: 4425: 4418: 4409: 4281:Aboriginal title 4098:Civilization Act 4034:(D.C. Cir. 2009) 3741: 3734: 3727: 3718: 3711: 3710: 3699: 3697: 3686: 3684: 3673: 3671: 3660: 3658: 3647: 3645: 3634: 3632: 3621: 3619: 3608: 3606: 3595: 3593: 3582: 3580: 3569: 3567: 3560: 3546: 3540: 3537: 3531: 3528: 3522: 3519: 3513: 3510: 3504: 3479: 3461:10.2307/20070709 3443: 3432: 3421: 3410: 3391: 3389: 3378: 3372: 3370: 3361: 3355: 3348: 3342: 3340: 3320: 3314: 3308: 3300: 3294: 3292: 3284: 3275: 3269: 3262: 3256: 3254: 3250: 3245: 3239: 3237: 3228: 3222: 3213: 3207: 3201: 3195: 3185: 3179: 3173: 3167: 3161: 3155: 3145: 3139: 3133: 3127: 3108: 3102: 3096: 3090: 3084: 3078: 3072: 3066: 3056: 3050: 3031: 3025: 3019: 3013: 3011: 3007: 3001: 2999: 2995: 2989: 2979: 2973: 2963: 2957: 2951: 2945: 2939: 2933: 2923: 2917: 2911: 2910:75 Alb. L. Rev. 2908: 2897: 2891: 2885: 2879: 2873: 2867: 2865: 2863:The Oyez Project 2853: 2847: 2845: 2841: 2835: 2825: 2819: 2809: 2803: 2801: 2792: 2786: 2776: 2770: 2760: 2754: 2748: 2742: 2723: 2717: 2716:(repealed 1973). 2694: 2688: 2681: 2675: 2669: 2663: 2653: 2647: 2645: 2641: 2635: 2625: 2619: 2617: 2613: 2607: 2601: 2595: 2589: 2588:38 Conn. L. Rev. 2578: 2572: 2569: 2563: 2560: 2554: 2551: 2545: 2542: 2536: 2533: 2527: 2525: 2517: 2511: 2508: 2502: 2499: 2493: 2486: 2480: 2477: 2471: 2470:Br. of Lara 1-2. 2468: 2462: 2443: 2437: 2431: 2423: 2417: 2414: 2408: 2405: 2399: 2396: 2390: 2387: 2381: 2378: 2372: 2369: 2363: 2360: 2354: 2351: 2345: 2326: 2320: 2317: 2311: 2308: 2302: 2296: 2290: 2284: 2278: 2272: 2266: 2260: 2254: 2240: 2234: 2228: 2222: 2216: 2210: 2204: 2198: 2192: 2186: 2181:(8th Cir. 2003) 2173:(8th Cir. 2002) 2164: 2158: 2152: 2146: 2140: 2134: 2128: 2122: 2116: 2110: 2104: 2098: 2096: 2088: 2079: 2073: 2071: 2067: 2061: 2059: 2055: 2049: 2047: 2043: 2037: 2034: 2028: 2026:§ 111(a)(1) 2019: 2013: 2011: 2007: 2001: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1983: 1977: 1971: 1965: 1952:(8th Cir. 2003) 1944:(8th Cir. 2002) 1931: 1925: 1923: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1905: 1898: 1892: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1876: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1854: 1853:40 Tulsa L. Rev. 1846: 1840: 1838: 1834: 1830: 1824: 1798: 1792: 1790: 1786: 1780: 1778: 1770: 1764: 1762: 1758: 1754: 1748: 1729: 1723: 1704: 1698: 1696: 1681: 1675: 1665: 1659: 1649: 1643: 1641: 1633: 1627: 1608: 1602: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1578: 1559: 1553: 1551: 1547: 1541: 1539: 1535: 1529: 1527: 1523: 1517: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1501: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1477: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1461: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1445: 1424: 1418: 1417: 1415: 1413: 1397: 1382: 1379: 1373: 1370: 1364: 1353: 1347: 1344: 1338: 1332: 1326: 1311:Pueblo of Laguna 1255: 1249: 1226: 1220: 1189: 1183: 1172: 1166: 1151: 1145: 1137: 1131: 1127: 1121: 1118: 1112: 1109: 1103: 1096: 1090: 1087: 1081: 1078: 1072: 1065: 1059: 1056: 1050: 1047: 1041: 1033: 981:resisting arrest 769:treaty matters. 614:, which granted 578:Court of Appeals 475:Major Crimes Act 422:Major Crimes Act 408:Major Crimes Act 402:Dakota Territory 322:Major Crimes Act 148:Court membership 120: 110: 104: 33: 32: 21: 5257: 5256: 5252: 5251: 5250: 5248: 5247: 5246: 5197: 5196: 5195: 5186: 5164:Howes v. Fields 4962: 4941: 4882: 4799: 4780: 4729: 4699:Grady v. Corbin 4670: 4632:Ashe v. Swenson 4592:After acquittal 4587: 4565:Grady v. Corbin 4540: 4523: 4459: 4445: 4436: 4406: 4401: 4318:Hunting license 4269: 4238: 4229: 4146:Nationality Act 4074: 4047:Sharp v. Murphy 3967:Hodel v. Irving 3871:Williams v. Lee 3839:Talton v. Mayes 3754: 3745: 3708: 3702: 3695: 3689: 3682: 3676: 3669: 3663: 3656: 3650: 3643: 3637: 3630: 3624: 3620:, November 2003 3617: 3611: 3604: 3598: 3591: 3585: 3581:, November 2003 3578: 3572: 3565: 3558: 3549: 3544: 3538: 3535: 3529: 3526: 3520: 3517: 3511: 3508: 3502: 3486: 3446: 3441: 3424: 3419: 3402: 3399: 3397:Further reading 3394: 3387: 3379: 3375: 3368: 3363:David Wilkins, 3362: 3358: 3349: 3345: 3341:, May 17, 2004. 3336: 3332:Wayback Machine 3321: 3317: 3306: 3301: 3297: 3290: 3282: 3276: 3272: 3263: 3259: 3252: 3248: 3246: 3242: 3235: 3229: 3225: 3214: 3210: 3202: 3198: 3186: 3182: 3174: 3170: 3162: 3158: 3146: 3142: 3134: 3130: 3109: 3105: 3097: 3093: 3085: 3081: 3073: 3069: 3057: 3053: 3032: 3028: 3020: 3016: 3009: 3008: 3004: 2997: 2996: 2992: 2980: 2976: 2964: 2960: 2952: 2948: 2940: 2936: 2924: 2920: 2909: 2907:75 Alb. L. Rev. 2906: 2898: 2894: 2886: 2882: 2874: 2870: 2861: 2854: 2850: 2843: 2842: 2838: 2826: 2822: 2810: 2806: 2799: 2793: 2789: 2777: 2773: 2761: 2757: 2749: 2745: 2724: 2720: 2695: 2691: 2682: 2678: 2670: 2666: 2654: 2650: 2643: 2642: 2638: 2626: 2622: 2615: 2614: 2610: 2602: 2598: 2587: 2579: 2575: 2570: 2566: 2561: 2557: 2552: 2548: 2543: 2539: 2534: 2530: 2523: 2518: 2514: 2509: 2505: 2500: 2496: 2487: 2483: 2478: 2474: 2469: 2465: 2444: 2440: 2429: 2424: 2420: 2415: 2411: 2406: 2402: 2397: 2393: 2388: 2384: 2379: 2375: 2370: 2366: 2361: 2357: 2352: 2348: 2327: 2323: 2318: 2314: 2309: 2305: 2297: 2293: 2285: 2281: 2273: 2269: 2261: 2257: 2241: 2237: 2229: 2225: 2217: 2213: 2205: 2201: 2193: 2189: 2165: 2161: 2153: 2149: 2141: 2137: 2129: 2125: 2117: 2113: 2105: 2101: 2094: 2086: 2081:Will Trachman, 2080: 2076: 2069: 2068: 2064: 2057: 2056: 2052: 2045: 2044: 2040: 2036:Batzer, at 295. 2035: 2031: 2020: 2016: 2009: 2008: 2004: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1984: 1980: 1972: 1968: 1932: 1928: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1912: 1908: 1899: 1895: 1888: 1884: 1883: 1879: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1852: 1847: 1843: 1836: 1832: 1831: 1827: 1799: 1795: 1788: 1787: 1783: 1776: 1771: 1767: 1760: 1756: 1755: 1751: 1730: 1726: 1705: 1701: 1694: 1682: 1678: 1666: 1662: 1650: 1646: 1639: 1634: 1630: 1609: 1605: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1585: 1581: 1560: 1556: 1549: 1548: 1544: 1537: 1536: 1532: 1525: 1524: 1520: 1513: 1509: 1508: 1504: 1500:xvi, 15 (2011). 1497: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1484: 1480: 1473: 1470:Michael Johnson 1469: 1468: 1464: 1457: 1453: 1452: 1448: 1425: 1421: 1411: 1409: 1399: 1398: 1394: 1390: 1385: 1380: 1376: 1371: 1367: 1361:Thurston County 1354: 1350: 1345: 1341: 1333: 1329: 1295:Nez Perce Tribe 1279:Menominee Tribe 1256: 1252: 1227: 1223: 1190: 1186: 1173: 1169: 1155:David R. Hansen 1152: 1148: 1138: 1134: 1128: 1124: 1119: 1115: 1110: 1106: 1097: 1093: 1088: 1084: 1079: 1075: 1066: 1062: 1057: 1053: 1048: 1044: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1014: 1001: 999:Books and media 957: 949: 947:Release of Lara 944: 879: 870:Clarence Thomas 866: 853:Anthony Kennedy 849: 847:Justice Kennedy 832: 830:Justice Stevens 819: 774:Menominee tribe 738: 691: 634: 629: 624: 607:Fifth Amendment 580: 562: 557: 525: 495: 465:In response to 428: 420:Main articles: 410: 365: 360: 352:double jeopardy 303:Native American 201: 199:Clarence Thomas 189: 187:Anthony Kennedy 177: 167:John P. Stevens 116: 106: 100: 87: 44: 38: 19: 12: 11: 5: 5255: 5253: 5245: 5244: 5239: 5234: 5229: 5224: 5219: 5214: 5209: 5199: 5198: 5192: 5191: 5188: 5187: 5185: 5184: 5176: 5168: 5160: 5156:Bobby v. Dixon 5152: 5144: 5136: 5128: 5120: 5112: 5104: 5096: 5088: 5080: 5072: 5064: 5056: 5048: 5040: 5032: 5024: 5016: 5008: 5000: 4992: 4984: 4976: 4967: 4964: 4963: 4958: 4951: 4950: 4947: 4946: 4943: 4942: 4940: 4939: 4931: 4923: 4915: 4907: 4899: 4890: 4888: 4884: 4883: 4881: 4880: 4872: 4864: 4856: 4848: 4840: 4832: 4824: 4816: 4807: 4805: 4801: 4800: 4798: 4797: 4788: 4786: 4782: 4781: 4779: 4778: 4770: 4762: 4754: 4746: 4737: 4735: 4734:After mistrial 4731: 4730: 4728: 4727: 4719: 4711: 4703: 4695: 4687: 4678: 4676: 4672: 4671: 4669: 4668: 4660: 4652: 4644: 4636: 4628: 4620: 4612: 4604: 4595: 4593: 4589: 4588: 4586: 4585: 4577: 4569: 4561: 4552: 4550: 4542: 4541: 4536: 4529: 4528: 4525: 4524: 4522: 4521: 4513: 4505: 4497: 4493:Maxwell v. Dow 4489: 4481: 4473: 4464: 4461: 4460: 4454: 4447: 4446: 4437: 4435: 4434: 4427: 4420: 4412: 4403: 4402: 4400: 4399: 4394: 4393: 4392: 4382: 4377: 4375:Trail of Tears 4372: 4367: 4362: 4357: 4352: 4347: 4342: 4337: 4332: 4327: 4320: 4315: 4314: 4313: 4303: 4298: 4293: 4288: 4283: 4277: 4275: 4271: 4270: 4268: 4267: 4262: 4257: 4256: 4255: 4244: 4242: 4231: 4230: 4228: 4227: 4221: 4215: 4209: 4203: 4197: 4191: 4185: 4179: 4173: 4167: 4161: 4155: 4152:Public Law 280 4149: 4143: 4137: 4131: 4125: 4119: 4113: 4107: 4101: 4095: 4089: 4088:(1705 onwards) 4082: 4080: 4076: 4075: 4073: 4072: 4066: 4065: 4057: 4043: 4035: 4027: 4019: 4011: 4003: 3995: 3987: 3979: 3971: 3963: 3955: 3947: 3939: 3931: 3923: 3915: 3907: 3899: 3891: 3883: 3875: 3867: 3859: 3851: 3843: 3835: 3827: 3823:Elk v. Wilkins 3819: 3811: 3810:(D. Neb. 1879) 3803: 3795: 3787: 3779: 3771: 3762: 3760: 3756: 3755: 3746: 3744: 3743: 3736: 3729: 3721: 3713: 3712: 3700: 3687: 3674: 3661: 3648: 3635: 3622: 3609: 3596: 3594:, January 2004 3583: 3570: 3547: 3524:Google Scholar 3485: 3484:External links 3482: 3481: 3480: 3444: 3439: 3422: 3417: 3398: 3395: 3393: 3392: 3373: 3356: 3343: 3315: 3295: 3270: 3257: 3255:(3d ed. 1998). 3240: 3223: 3219:Inmate Locator 3208: 3196: 3180: 3168: 3156: 3140: 3128: 3103: 3091: 3079: 3067: 3051: 3043:25 U.S.C. 3041:, codified at 3026: 3014: 3002: 2990: 2974: 2958: 2946: 2934: 2918: 2892: 2880: 2868: 2848: 2836: 2820: 2804: 2787: 2771: 2755: 2743: 2735:25 U.S.C. 2733:, codified at 2718: 2706:25 U.S.C. 2704:, codified at 2689: 2676: 2664: 2648: 2636: 2620: 2608: 2596: 2573: 2571:Br. of Morris. 2564: 2555: 2546: 2537: 2528: 2512: 2503: 2494: 2481: 2479:Br. of Lara 6. 2472: 2463: 2438: 2418: 2409: 2400: 2391: 2382: 2373: 2364: 2355: 2346: 2321: 2312: 2303: 2291: 2279: 2267: 2255: 2235: 2223: 2211: 2199: 2187: 2159: 2147: 2135: 2123: 2111: 2099: 2074: 2062: 2050: 2038: 2029: 2022:18 U.S.C. 2014: 2002: 1978: 1966: 1926: 1906: 1893: 1877: 1841: 1825: 1813:25 U.S.C. 1793: 1781: 1765: 1749: 1724: 1699: 1684:18 U.S.C. 1676: 1668:18 U.S.C. 1660: 1652:18 U.S.C. 1644: 1628: 1620:18 U.S.C. 1603: 1587:George E. Hyde 1579: 1554: 1542: 1530: 1518: 1502: 1478: 1462: 1454:N. Bruce Duthu 1446: 1419: 1391: 1389: 1386: 1384: 1383: 1374: 1365: 1348: 1339: 1327: 1250: 1221: 1184: 1167: 1159:George G. Fagg 1146: 1132: 1122: 1113: 1104: 1091: 1082: 1073: 1060: 1051: 1042: 1027: 1025: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1013: 1010: 1000: 997: 996: 995: 984: 972: 969: 956: 953: 948: 945: 943: 940: 895:Antonin Scalia 878: 875: 865: 864:Justice Thomas 862: 848: 845: 831: 828: 818: 815: 754:Stephen Breyer 737: 734: 716:Bill of Rights 690: 687: 633: 630: 628: 625: 623: 620: 579: 576: 561: 558: 556: 553: 524: 521: 494: 489: 409: 406: 389:Eastern Dakota 385:Western Dakota 364: 361: 359: 356: 316:In the 1880s, 285: 284: 282:§ 1301(2) 278:25 U.S.C. 266: 265: 261: 260: 257: 253: 252: 249: 245: 244: 241: 237: 236: 233: 229: 228: 225: 221: 220: 216: 215: 214: 213: 211:Stephen Breyer 179:Antonin Scalia 164: 161: 156: 150: 149: 145: 144: 132: 131: 127: 126: 98: 94: 93: 89: 88: 77: 61: 57: 56: 51: 50:Full case name 47: 46: 40: 39: 34: 26: 25: 17: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5254: 5243: 5240: 5238: 5235: 5233: 5230: 5228: 5225: 5223: 5220: 5218: 5215: 5213: 5210: 5208: 5205: 5204: 5202: 5182: 5181: 5180:Vega v. Tekoh 5177: 5174: 5173: 5169: 5166: 5165: 5161: 5158: 5157: 5153: 5150: 5149: 5145: 5142: 5141: 5137: 5134: 5133: 5129: 5126: 5125: 5121: 5118: 5117: 5113: 5110: 5109: 5105: 5102: 5101: 5097: 5094: 5093: 5089: 5086: 5085: 5081: 5078: 5077: 5073: 5070: 5069: 5065: 5062: 5061: 5057: 5054: 5053: 5049: 5046: 5045: 5041: 5038: 5037: 5033: 5030: 5029: 5025: 5022: 5021: 5017: 5014: 5013: 5009: 5006: 5005: 5001: 4998: 4997: 4993: 4990: 4989: 4985: 4982: 4981: 4977: 4974: 4973: 4969: 4968: 4965: 4961: 4956: 4952: 4937: 4936: 4932: 4929: 4928: 4924: 4921: 4920: 4916: 4913: 4912: 4908: 4905: 4904: 4900: 4897: 4896: 4892: 4891: 4889: 4885: 4878: 4877: 4873: 4870: 4869: 4865: 4862: 4861: 4857: 4854: 4853: 4849: 4846: 4845: 4841: 4838: 4837: 4833: 4830: 4829: 4825: 4822: 4821: 4817: 4814: 4813: 4809: 4808: 4806: 4802: 4795: 4794: 4790: 4789: 4787: 4783: 4776: 4775: 4771: 4768: 4767: 4763: 4760: 4759: 4755: 4752: 4751: 4747: 4744: 4743: 4739: 4738: 4736: 4732: 4725: 4724: 4720: 4717: 4716: 4712: 4709: 4708: 4704: 4701: 4700: 4696: 4693: 4692: 4688: 4685: 4684: 4680: 4679: 4677: 4673: 4666: 4665: 4661: 4658: 4657: 4653: 4650: 4649: 4645: 4642: 4641: 4637: 4634: 4633: 4629: 4626: 4625: 4621: 4618: 4617: 4613: 4610: 4609: 4605: 4602: 4601: 4597: 4596: 4594: 4590: 4583: 4582: 4578: 4575: 4574: 4570: 4567: 4566: 4562: 4559: 4558: 4554: 4553: 4551: 4547: 4543: 4539: 4534: 4530: 4519: 4518: 4514: 4511: 4510: 4506: 4503: 4502: 4498: 4495: 4494: 4490: 4487: 4486: 4482: 4479: 4478: 4477:Ex parte Bain 4474: 4471: 4470: 4466: 4465: 4462: 4457: 4452: 4448: 4443: 4440: 4433: 4428: 4426: 4421: 4419: 4414: 4413: 4410: 4398: 4395: 4391: 4388: 4387: 4386: 4383: 4381: 4380:Treaty rights 4378: 4376: 4373: 4371: 4368: 4366: 4365:Seminole Wars 4363: 4361: 4358: 4356: 4353: 4351: 4348: 4346: 4343: 4341: 4338: 4336: 4333: 4331: 4328: 4326: 4325: 4321: 4319: 4316: 4312: 4309: 4308: 4307: 4304: 4302: 4299: 4297: 4294: 4292: 4289: 4287: 4284: 4282: 4279: 4278: 4276: 4272: 4266: 4263: 4261: 4258: 4254: 4251: 4250: 4249: 4246: 4245: 4243: 4241: 4236: 4232: 4225: 4222: 4219: 4216: 4213: 4210: 4207: 4204: 4201: 4198: 4195: 4192: 4189: 4186: 4183: 4180: 4177: 4174: 4171: 4168: 4165: 4162: 4159: 4156: 4153: 4150: 4147: 4144: 4141: 4138: 4135: 4132: 4129: 4126: 4123: 4120: 4117: 4114: 4111: 4108: 4105: 4102: 4099: 4096: 4093: 4090: 4087: 4084: 4083: 4081: 4077: 4071: 4068: 4067: 4063: 4062: 4058: 4055: 4054: 4049: 4048: 4044: 4041: 4040: 4036: 4033: 4032: 4028: 4025: 4024: 4020: 4017: 4016: 4012: 4009: 4008: 4004: 4001: 4000: 3996: 3993: 3992: 3988: 3985: 3984: 3983:Duro v. Reina 3980: 3977: 3976: 3972: 3969: 3968: 3964: 3961: 3960: 3956: 3953: 3952: 3948: 3945: 3944: 3940: 3937: 3936: 3932: 3929: 3928: 3924: 3921: 3920: 3916: 3913: 3912: 3908: 3905: 3904: 3900: 3897: 3896: 3892: 3889: 3888: 3884: 3881: 3880: 3876: 3873: 3872: 3868: 3865: 3864: 3860: 3857: 3856: 3852: 3849: 3848: 3844: 3841: 3840: 3836: 3833: 3832: 3828: 3825: 3824: 3820: 3817: 3816: 3812: 3809: 3808: 3804: 3801: 3800: 3796: 3793: 3792: 3788: 3785: 3784: 3780: 3777: 3776: 3772: 3769: 3768: 3764: 3763: 3761: 3757: 3753: 3749: 3742: 3737: 3735: 3730: 3728: 3723: 3722: 3719: 3715: 3707: 3706: 3701: 3694: 3693: 3688: 3681: 3680: 3675: 3668: 3667: 3662: 3655: 3654: 3649: 3642: 3641: 3636: 3629: 3628: 3623: 3616: 3615: 3610: 3603: 3602: 3597: 3590: 3589: 3584: 3577: 3576: 3571: 3564: 3557: 3556: 3553: 3548: 3543: 3534: 3525: 3516: 3515:CourtListener 3507: 3500: 3496: 3492: 3488: 3487: 3483: 3478: 3474: 3470: 3466: 3462: 3458: 3455:(2): 285–92, 3454: 3450: 3445: 3442: 3436: 3431: 3430: 3423: 3420: 3414: 3409: 3408: 3401: 3400: 3396: 3385: 3384: 3380:David Stout, 3377: 3374: 3366: 3360: 3357: 3353: 3347: 3344: 3339: 3334: 3333: 3329: 3326: 3322:Paul McSloy, 3319: 3316: 3312: 3305: 3299: 3296: 3288: 3280: 3274: 3271: 3267: 3261: 3258: 3244: 3241: 3233: 3227: 3224: 3220: 3217: 3212: 3209: 3205: 3200: 3197: 3193: 3189: 3184: 3181: 3177: 3172: 3169: 3165: 3160: 3157: 3153: 3149: 3144: 3141: 3137: 3132: 3129: 3125: 3122: 3118: 3114: 3113: 3107: 3104: 3100: 3095: 3092: 3088: 3083: 3080: 3076: 3071: 3068: 3064: 3060: 3055: 3052: 3048: 3044: 3040: 3036: 3030: 3027: 3023: 3018: 3015: 3006: 3003: 2994: 2991: 2987: 2983: 2978: 2975: 2971: 2967: 2962: 2959: 2955: 2950: 2947: 2943: 2938: 2935: 2931: 2927: 2922: 2919: 2915: 2905: 2901: 2896: 2893: 2889: 2884: 2881: 2877: 2872: 2869: 2864: 2859: 2858: 2852: 2849: 2840: 2837: 2833: 2829: 2824: 2821: 2817: 2813: 2808: 2805: 2797: 2791: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2775: 2772: 2768: 2764: 2759: 2756: 2752: 2747: 2744: 2740: 2736: 2732: 2728: 2722: 2719: 2715: 2711: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2693: 2690: 2686: 2680: 2677: 2673: 2668: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2652: 2649: 2640: 2637: 2633: 2629: 2624: 2621: 2612: 2609: 2605: 2600: 2597: 2593: 2586: 2582: 2577: 2574: 2568: 2565: 2559: 2556: 2550: 2547: 2541: 2538: 2532: 2529: 2522: 2516: 2513: 2507: 2504: 2498: 2495: 2491: 2485: 2482: 2476: 2473: 2467: 2464: 2460: 2457: 2453: 2449: 2448: 2442: 2439: 2435: 2428: 2422: 2419: 2413: 2410: 2404: 2401: 2398:Br. of Idaho. 2395: 2392: 2386: 2383: 2377: 2374: 2368: 2365: 2359: 2356: 2350: 2347: 2343: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2331: 2325: 2322: 2316: 2313: 2307: 2304: 2300: 2295: 2292: 2288: 2283: 2280: 2276: 2271: 2268: 2264: 2259: 2256: 2252: 2248: 2244: 2239: 2236: 2232: 2227: 2224: 2220: 2215: 2212: 2208: 2203: 2200: 2196: 2191: 2188: 2184: 2180: 2176: 2172: 2171:294 F.3d 1004 2168: 2163: 2160: 2156: 2151: 2148: 2144: 2139: 2136: 2132: 2127: 2124: 2120: 2115: 2112: 2108: 2103: 2100: 2092: 2084: 2078: 2075: 2066: 2063: 2054: 2051: 2042: 2039: 2033: 2030: 2027: 2023: 2018: 2015: 2006: 2003: 1988: 1982: 1979: 1975: 1970: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1942:294 F.3d 1004 1939: 1935: 1930: 1927: 1910: 1907: 1903: 1897: 1894: 1881: 1878: 1862: 1858: 1851: 1845: 1842: 1829: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1797: 1794: 1785: 1782: 1774: 1769: 1766: 1753: 1750: 1746: 1743: 1739: 1735: 1734: 1733:Duro v. Reina 1728: 1725: 1721: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1709: 1703: 1700: 1693: 1689: 1685: 1680: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1664: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1648: 1645: 1638: 1632: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1607: 1604: 1583: 1580: 1576: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1564: 1558: 1555: 1546: 1543: 1534: 1531: 1522: 1519: 1506: 1503: 1482: 1479: 1466: 1463: 1450: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1423: 1420: 1407: 1403: 1396: 1393: 1387: 1378: 1375: 1369: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1352: 1349: 1343: 1340: 1336: 1331: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1291:Mohegan Tribe 1288: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1254: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1225: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1188: 1185: 1181: 1180:Ninth Circuit 1177: 1176:circuit split 1171: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1150: 1147: 1142: 1136: 1133: 1126: 1123: 1117: 1114: 1108: 1105: 1101: 1095: 1092: 1086: 1083: 1077: 1074: 1070: 1064: 1061: 1055: 1052: 1046: 1043: 1038: 1032: 1029: 1023: 1019: 1016: 1015: 1011: 1009: 1007: 998: 993: 992:plenary power 989: 985: 982: 977: 973: 970: 966: 965: 964: 962: 954: 952: 946: 941: 939: 937: 933: 927: 925: 920: 916: 912: 908: 907: 902: 901: 896: 892: 883: 876: 874: 871: 863: 861: 859: 854: 846: 844: 841: 837: 829: 823: 816: 814: 812: 806: 804: 800: 795: 791: 787: 783: 779: 775: 770: 767: 763: 758: 755: 747: 742: 735: 733: 731: 727: 723: 722: 721:amicus curiae 717: 712: 707: 706: 701: 697: 688: 686: 684: 680: 676: 672: 668: 664: 660: 655: 654: 649: 645: 641: 638: 632:United States 631: 626: 622:Supreme Court 621: 619: 617: 613: 612:Supreme Court 608: 603: 602: 596: 594: 589: 585: 577: 575: 572: 568: 559: 554: 552: 550: 546: 542: 538: 534: 530: 522: 520: 518: 514: 510: 506: 502: 501: 500:Duro v. Reina 493: 492:Duro v. Reina 490: 488: 486: 485: 480: 476: 472: 468: 463: 461: 460: 455: 454: 453:habeas corpus 449: 445: 441: 437: 434:Lakota named 433: 427: 423: 414: 407: 405: 403: 398: 394: 390: 386: 382: 378: 369: 362: 357: 355: 353: 349: 345: 340: 338: 333: 332: 331:Duro v. Reina 327: 323: 319: 314: 312: 308: 304: 300: 299:landmark case 297: 293: 292: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 262: 258: 254: 250: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 226: 222: 219:Case opinions 217: 212: 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 188: 184: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165: 162: 160: 157: 155:Chief Justice 154: 153: 151: 146: 142: 138: 133: 128: 124: 119: 114: 109: 103: 99: 95: 90: 85: 81: 75: 74: 69: 66: 62: 58: 55: 52: 48: 41: 37: 27: 22: 16: 5178: 5170: 5162: 5154: 5146: 5138: 5130: 5122: 5114: 5106: 5098: 5090: 5082: 5074: 5066: 5058: 5050: 5042: 5034: 5026: 5018: 5010: 5002: 4994: 4986: 4978: 4970: 4933: 4925: 4917: 4909: 4901: 4893: 4874: 4866: 4858: 4851: 4850: 4842: 4834: 4826: 4818: 4810: 4791: 4772: 4764: 4756: 4748: 4740: 4721: 4713: 4705: 4697: 4689: 4681: 4662: 4654: 4646: 4638: 4630: 4622: 4614: 4606: 4598: 4579: 4571: 4563: 4555: 4515: 4507: 4499: 4491: 4483: 4475: 4467: 4322: 4194:Diminishment 4059: 4051: 4045: 4037: 4029: 4021: 4014: 4013: 4005: 3997: 3989: 3981: 3973: 3965: 3957: 3949: 3941: 3933: 3925: 3917: 3909: 3901: 3893: 3885: 3877: 3869: 3861: 3853: 3845: 3837: 3829: 3821: 3813: 3805: 3797: 3789: 3781: 3773: 3765: 3714: 3704: 3691: 3678: 3665: 3652: 3639: 3626: 3613: 3600: 3587: 3574: 3563:the original 3555: 3551: 3490: 3452: 3448: 3428: 3406: 3381: 3376: 3364: 3359: 3351: 3346: 3323: 3318: 3310: 3303: 3298: 3286: 3278: 3273: 3265: 3260: 3243: 3231: 3226: 3211: 3203: 3199: 3191: 3187: 3183: 3175: 3171: 3163: 3159: 3151: 3147: 3143: 3135: 3131: 3126: (1993). 3110: 3106: 3098: 3094: 3086: 3082: 3074: 3070: 3062: 3058: 3054: 3029: 3021: 3017: 3005: 2993: 2985: 2981: 2977: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2953: 2949: 2941: 2937: 2929: 2925: 2921: 2913: 2903: 2899: 2895: 2887: 2883: 2875: 2871: 2855: 2851: 2839: 2831: 2827: 2823: 2815: 2811: 2807: 2795: 2790: 2782: 2778: 2774: 2766: 2762: 2758: 2750: 2746: 2721: 2692: 2684: 2679: 2671: 2667: 2659: 2655: 2651: 2639: 2631: 2627: 2623: 2611: 2603: 2599: 2591: 2584: 2580: 2576: 2567: 2558: 2549: 2540: 2531: 2520: 2515: 2506: 2497: 2489: 2484: 2475: 2466: 2461: (1978). 2445: 2441: 2433: 2426: 2421: 2412: 2403: 2394: 2385: 2376: 2367: 2358: 2349: 2344: (1978). 2328: 2324: 2315: 2306: 2298: 2294: 2286: 2282: 2274: 2270: 2262: 2258: 2250: 2247:324 F.3d 635 2242: 2238: 2230: 2226: 2218: 2214: 2206: 2202: 2194: 2190: 2182: 2179:324 F.3d 635 2174: 2166: 2162: 2154: 2150: 2142: 2138: 2130: 2126: 2118: 2114: 2106: 2102: 2090: 2082: 2077: 2065: 2053: 2041: 2032: 2017: 2010:Pommererheim 2005: 1986: 1981: 1973: 1969: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1950:324 F.3d 635 1945: 1937: 1933: 1929: 1909: 1901: 1896: 1880: 1860: 1856: 1849: 1844: 1828: 1817:§§ 1301 1796: 1784: 1772: 1768: 1752: 1747: (1990). 1731: 1727: 1722: (1886). 1706: 1702: 1691: 1679: 1663: 1647: 1642:(2011–2012). 1636: 1631: 1606: 1582: 1577: (1883). 1561: 1557: 1545: 1533: 1521: 1505: 1481: 1465: 1449: 1441: 1426: 1422: 1410:. Retrieved 1406:the original 1395: 1377: 1368: 1351: 1342: 1334: 1330: 1275:Lummi Nation 1253: 1242:South Dakota 1224: 1187: 1170: 1149: 1140: 1135: 1125: 1116: 1107: 1094: 1085: 1076: 1063: 1054: 1045: 1031: 1002: 958: 950: 935: 931: 928: 918: 914: 904: 898: 891:David Souter 888: 867: 850: 833: 817:Concurrences 807: 798: 793: 789: 785: 771: 759: 751: 745: 730:Lewis County 719: 710: 703: 699: 695: 692: 666: 662: 651: 643: 635: 599: 597: 592: 587: 581: 570: 563: 560:Trial courts 533:North Dakota 526: 516: 508: 505:jurisdiction 498: 496: 491: 482: 466: 464: 457: 451: 448:South Dakota 440:Spotted Tail 429: 377:Sioux people 374: 341: 329: 315: 290: 289: 288: 264:Laws applied 206: 194: 191:David Souter 182: 170: 137:Indian tribe 117: 107: 101: 92:Case history 71: 53: 15: 4296:Dawes Rolls 4079:Legislation 3313:, at 49-50. 3268:, at 49-50. 2710:§§ 891 2070:USCA Const. 2058:USCA Const. 2046:USCA Const. 1914:Gregg Barak 1688:§ 1151 1672:§ 1151 1656:§ 1151 1624:§ 1151 1363:, Nebraska. 955:Law reviews 924:Philippines 473:passed the 337:sovereignty 320:passed the 248:Concurrence 240:Concurrence 232:Concurrence 141:federal law 5201:Categories 4456:Grand Jury 4370:Survivance 4116:Curtis Act 3388:N.Y. Times 2739:§ 903 2060:amend. XIV 1388:References 1213:New Mexico 1197:California 961:law review 803:common law 675:Washington 616:certiorari 574:offenses. 395:area. The 358:Background 307:sovereigns 84:U.S. LEXIS 82:420; 2004 4122:Burke Act 4110:Dawes Act 3469:0094-002X 3311:Dialectic 3266:Dialectic 3264:Skibine, 3194:, at 682. 3154:, at 678. 3063:Dialectic 3047:§ 71 2986:Dialectic 2972:, at 682. 2930:Dialectic 2914:Dialectic 2834:, at 682. 2816:Dialectic 2796:Dialectic 2785:, at 678. 2769:, at 679. 2687:, at 679. 2662:, at 678. 2634:, at 437. 2632:Formalism 2490:Dialectic 2434:Formalism 2097:, at 781. 2093:, at 51; 2091:Dialectic 2048:amend. V. 2012:, at 251. 1924:, at 153. 1902:Dialectic 1900:Skibine, 1857:Dialectic 1839:, at 187. 1835:, at 47; 1626:et seq.). 1512:, at 37; 1412:April 28, 1234:Louisiana 1161:, and J. 1144:required. 1037:Blackfoot 911:precedent 811:sovereign 776:with the 640:Ted Olson 627:Arguments 442:, on the 393:Minnesota 80:L. Ed. 2d 60:Citations 4444:case law 3759:Case law 3489:Text of 3477:20070709 3350:McSloy, 3328:Archived 3065:, at 58. 2988:, at 58. 2916:, at 55. 2846:, at 48. 2818:, at 52. 2802:, at 48. 2492:, at 51. 1992:(2005); 1922:Williams 1920:(2007); 1904:, at 51. 1867:(2007); 1791:, at 47. 1779:, at 45. 1593:(1993); 1540:, at 77. 1538:Danziger 1528:, at 77. 1526:Danziger 1510:Danziger 1492:(1990); 1335:Oliphant 1238:Nebraska 1205:Michigan 1201:Colorado 1012:See also 936:Oliphant 919:Bourland 889:Justice 868:Justice 851:Justice 838:wrote a 834:Justice 794:Oliphant 752:Justice 471:Congress 436:Crow Dog 416:Crow Dog 397:Chippewa 318:Congress 224:Majority 4274:Related 4235:Federal 3506:Cornell 3293:(2004). 3238:(2004). 2741:et seq. 2275:Lara II 2263:Lara II 2000:(2009). 1891:(2005). 1875:(2010). 1837:Vinzant 1763:(2006). 1697:(1995). 1658:et seq. 1601:(1915). 1476:(2012). 1460:(2008). 1230:Alabama 1209:Montana 1193:Arizona 877:Dissent 790:Wheeler 764:of the 700:Wheeler 661:of the 601:en banc 363:History 256:Dissent 235:Stevens 130:Holding 5222:Dakota 5183:(2022) 5175:(2013) 5167:(2012) 5159:(2011) 5151:(2011) 5143:(2010) 5135:(2010) 5127:(2010) 5119:(2009) 5111:(2004) 5103:(2004) 5095:(2004) 5087:(2003) 5079:(2000) 5071:(2000) 5063:(1999) 5055:(1991) 5047:(1990) 5039:(1988) 5031:(1985) 5023:(1981) 5015:(1974) 5007:(1970) 4999:(1969) 4991:(1966) 4983:(1965) 4975:(1957) 4938:(1969) 4930:(1969) 4922:(1966) 4914:(1947) 4906:(1937) 4898:(1885) 4879:(2022) 4871:(2019) 4863:(2016) 4855:(2004) 4847:(1985) 4839:(1978) 4831:(1970) 4823:(1959) 4815:(1922) 4796:(1932) 4777:(2012) 4769:(1982) 4761:(1976) 4753:(1971) 4745:(1824) 4726:(2023) 4718:(1993) 4710:(1992) 4702:(1990) 4694:(1976) 4686:(1833) 4667:(2024) 4659:(2016) 4651:(2013) 4643:(1978) 4635:(1970) 4627:(1962) 4619:(1906) 4611:(1896) 4603:(1834) 4584:(1993) 4576:(1992) 4568:(1990) 4560:(1932) 4520:(2002) 4512:(1962) 4504:(1922) 4496:(1900) 4488:(1896) 4480:(1887) 4472:(1884) 4458:Clause 4226:(2008) 4220:(1990) 4214:(1990) 4208:(1990) 4202:(1988) 4196:(1984) 4190:(1978) 4184:(1978) 4178:(1975) 4172:(1971) 4166:(1968) 4160:(1956) 4154:(1953) 4148:(1940) 4142:(1936) 4136:(1934) 4130:(1924) 4124:(1906) 4118:(1898) 4112:(1887) 4106:(1830) 4100:(1819) 4064:(2022) 4056:(2020) 4042:(2013) 4026:(2005) 4018:(2004) 4010:(2001) 4002:(1997) 3994:(1993) 3986:(1990) 3978:(1989) 3970:(1987) 3962:(1986) 3954:(1985) 3946:(1984) 3938:(1982) 3930:(1978) 3922:(1977) 3914:(1976) 3906:(1974) 3898:(1973) 3890:(1968) 3882:(1960) 3874:(1959) 3866:(1955) 3858:(1941) 3850:(1903) 3842:(1896) 3834:(1896) 3826:(1884) 3818:(1883) 3802:(1858) 3794:(1857) 3786:(1832) 3778:(1831) 3770:(1823) 3748:Rights 3545:  3539:  3536:  3533:Justia 3530:  3527:  3521:  3518:  3512:  3509:  3503:  3475:  3467:  3437:  3415:  3192:Status 3152:Status 3099:Kagama 3045:  3037:  3010:Const. 2998:Const. 2970:Status 2832:Status 2783:Status 2767:Status 2737:  2729:  2708:  2700:  2685:Status 2660:Status 2644:Const. 2616:Const. 2592:Status 2231:Lara I 2219:Lara I 2207:Lara I 2195:Lara I 2024:  1815:  1807:  1686:  1670:  1654:  1622:  1614:  1514:Gagnon 1244:, and 1217:Oregon 1141:Petite 968:tribe. 792:, and 702:, and 593:Petite 571:Petite 523:Arrest 381:Lakota 326:felony 280:  209: 207:· 205:  197: 195:· 193:  185: 183:· 181:  173: 171:· 169:  135:As an 121:, 111:, 4887:Other 3709:(PDF) 3696:(PDF) 3683:(PDF) 3670:(PDF) 3657:(PDF) 3644:(PDF) 3631:(PDF) 3618:(PDF) 3605:(PDF) 3592:(PDF) 3579:(PDF) 3566:(PDF) 3559:(PDF) 3497: 3473:JSTOR 3352:supra 3119: 3035:Stat. 2844:Duthu 2800:Duthu 2727:Stat. 2698:Stat. 2454: 2337: 2251:rev'd 2183:rev'd 2095:Barak 1962:rev'd 1958:rev'd 1954:rev'd 1938:aff'd 1833:Duthu 1805:Stat. 1789:Duthu 1777:Duthu 1740: 1715: 1612:Stat. 1570: 1433: 1178:–the 1157:, J. 1024:Notes 679:Idaho 432:Brulé 97:Prior 3499:U.S. 3465:ISSN 3435:ISBN 3413:ISBN 3204:Lara 3188:Lara 3176:Lara 3164:Lara 3148:Lara 3136:Lara 3121:U.S. 3087:Lara 3075:Lara 3059:Lara 3022:Lara 2982:Lara 2966:Lara 2954:Lara 2942:Lara 2926:Lara 2900:Lara 2888:Lara 2876:Lara 2828:Lara 2812:Lara 2779:Lara 2763:Lara 2751:Lara 2672:Lara 2656:Lara 2628:Lara 2604:Lara 2581:Lara 2456:U.S. 2339:U.S. 2299:Lara 2155:Lara 2143:Lara 2131:Lara 2119:Lara 2107:Lara 1974:Lara 1821:1303 1773:Duro 1742:U.S. 1717:U.S. 1572:U.S. 1442:Lara 1435:U.S. 1414:2020 1246:Utah 1215:and 1139:The 934:and 932:Duro 915:Duro 799:Duro 786:Duro 746:Lara 711:Duro 696:Duro 689:Lara 667:Duro 663:Duro 644:Duro 588:Duro 517:Duro 509:Duro 424:and 375:The 86:2738 73:more 65:U.S. 63:541 4237:and 4050:and 3750:of 3495:541 3457:doi 3124:679 3117:508 3039:566 2731:770 2714:902 2702:250 2459:191 2452:435 2342:313 2335:435 1745:676 1738:495 1720:375 1713:118 1616:385 1575:556 1568:109 1438:193 1431:541 446:in 68:193 5203:: 3493:, 3471:, 3463:, 3453:28 3451:, 3386:, 3367:, 3335:, 3289:, 3281:, 3251:, 3234:, 3115:, 2860:, 2594:). 2450:, 2436:). 2333:, 2245:, 2177:, 2169:, 2085:, 1996:, 1948:, 1940:, 1916:, 1887:, 1871:, 1863:, 1823:). 1809:77 1759:, 1736:, 1711:, 1597:, 1589:, 1566:, 1496:, 1488:, 1472:, 1456:, 1444:). 1429:, 1317:, 1313:, 1309:, 1305:, 1301:, 1297:, 1293:, 1289:, 1285:, 1281:, 1277:, 1273:, 1269:, 1265:, 1261:, 1240:, 1236:, 1232:, 1211:, 1207:, 1203:, 1199:, 1195:, 938:. 788:, 728:, 698:, 487:. 469:, 313:. 276:; 272:; 4431:e 4424:t 4417:v 3740:e 3733:t 3726:v 3459:: 3354:. 3049:. 2712:– 1819:– 1674:. 1416:. 1325:. 1248:. 1219:. 1165:. 748:. 76:) 70:(

Index

Supreme Court of the United States
U.S.
193
more
L. Ed. 2d
U.S. LEXIS
294 F.3d 1004
324 F.3d 635
Indian tribe
federal law
William Rehnquist
John P. Stevens
Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy
David Souter
Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer
U.S. Const. Art. II, §2
U.S. Const. amend. V
25 U.S.C.
§ 1301(2)
United States Supreme Court
landmark case
Native American
sovereigns
Double Jeopardy Clause
Congress
Major Crimes Act

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.