27:
111:, filed a request in German court for an interim injunction prohibiting the German Government from including a reference to the applicant association in a publication on "So-called youth sects and psycho-groups in the Federal Republic of Germany" until a final court's decision on prohibiting the reference. The interim injunction was granted by the
131:
The commission considered that "a State ... is entitled to convey, in an objective, but critical manner, information on religious communities and sects, if such information does not pursue aims of agitation or indoctrination endangering the freedom of religion" and that "the reference to the
122:
Administrative Court of Appeal dismissed UL's request. It found that the documents produced by UL, in particular on the replacement of medical treatment by religious belief, showed a degree of danger for the general public justifying a reference to the applicant association in the envisaged
132:
applicant association in the intended publication does not have any direct repercussions on the religious freedom of the association or its members". Therefore it held that there was no interference with the applicant association's rights to freedom of religion under
210:
230:
225:
133:
181:
154:
240:
48:
89:
191:
164:
70:
235:
41:
35:
156:
Freedom of
Religion or Belief. Anti-Sect Movements and State Neutrality: A Case Study: Fecris. 12. Jahrgang (2012)
52:
119:
187:
160:
108:
219:
112:
104:
20:
183:
Regulating
Religion: Case Studies from Around the Globe
231:
European Court of Human Rights cases involving
Germany
123:
publication including a warning about its activities.
88:(application No. 29745/96) was a case decided by the
226:
Article 9 of the
European Convention on Human Rights
134:
Article 9 of the
European Convention on Human Rights
118:After a government appeal of the injunction, the
8:
153:Schäfer, Danny; Schwarzer, Corinna (2012).
71:Learn how and when to remove this message
241:Religious organisations based in Germany
34:This article includes a list of general
145:
7:
180:Richardson, James T. (2012-12-06).
90:European Commission of Human Rights
85:Universelles Leben e.V. v. Germany
40:it lacks sufficient corresponding
14:
25:
1:
257:
236:New religious movements
55:more precise citations.
159:. LIT Verlag Münster.
120:North Rhine-Westphalia
115:Administrative Court.
211:Commission's decision
16:1996 ECHR legal case
101:Universelles Leben
81:
80:
73:
248:
198:
197:
177:
171:
170:
150:
76:
69:
65:
62:
56:
51:this article by
42:inline citations
29:
28:
21:
256:
255:
251:
250:
249:
247:
246:
245:
216:
215:
207:
202:
201:
194:
179:
178:
174:
167:
152:
151:
147:
142:
129:
98:
77:
66:
60:
57:
47:Please help to
46:
30:
26:
17:
12:
11:
5:
254:
252:
244:
243:
238:
233:
228:
218:
217:
214:
213:
206:
205:External links
203:
200:
199:
192:
172:
165:
144:
143:
141:
138:
128:
125:
109:Universal Life
97:
94:
79:
78:
33:
31:
24:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
253:
242:
239:
237:
234:
232:
229:
227:
224:
223:
221:
212:
209:
208:
204:
195:
193:9781441990945
189:
185:
184:
176:
173:
168:
166:9783643998644
162:
158:
157:
149:
146:
139:
137:
135:
126:
124:
121:
116:
114:
110:
106:
102:
95:
93:
91:
87:
86:
75:
72:
64:
61:December 2014
54:
50:
44:
43:
37:
32:
23:
22:
19:
186:. Springer.
182:
175:
155:
148:
130:
117:
100:
99:
84:
83:
82:
67:
58:
39:
18:
53:introducing
220:Categories
140:References
107:branch of
36:references
92:in 1996.
127:Decision
113:Cologne
49:improve
190:
163:
105:German
103:, the
38:, but
96:Facts
188:ISBN
161:ISBN
222::
136:.
196:.
169:.
74:)
68:(
63:)
59:(
45:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.