Knowledge

Uranium hydride bomb

Source đź“ť

408:, weighed 7,400 lb (3,400 kg) and was 56 inches (140 cm) in diameter and 66 inches (170 cm) long. The nuclear system weighed 6,750 lb (3,060 kg). Defying the 1.5–3 kt predictions, its actual yield was only 200 tons. Wally Decker, a young Laboratory engineer, characterized the sound the shot made as "pop." The device failed to "automatically declassify" its test site, where the lower 100 ft (30 m) of the 300-foot (91 m) testing tower remained intact, the middle third scattered across the test area and only the upper third vaporized. 205:. In reality the result was that the slower neutrons delayed the reaction time too much by reducing the number of fission generations accomplished; especially as the core expanded to reach its snowplow region (where all nuclear reactions cease), more neutrons could escape from the turbulent surface of the core, and before enough energy (for military applications) could be produced. In all, neutron moderation sharply reduced the efficiency of the weapon before the 111: 246: 137:, in 1943, uranium deuteride was investigated as a promising bomb material; it was abandoned by early 1944 as it turned out such design would be inefficient. The "autocatalytic" design that emerged from this early research was "Elmer", the discontinued radial-implosion Mark 2 weapon. It made use of uranium deuteride particles coated with paraffin (to reduce the 209:
confinement failed. It was realized that the result would be a fizzle instead of full-scale detonation. The predicted yield was around 1 kilotonne of TNT (4.2 TJ), if the core operated as originally expected; the first rough estimate for the behavior of the "hydride" bomb appeared in 1944, when
200:
needed. At the same time, due to the moderating effect of deuterium, the compression requirements are (at least in principle) relaxed somewhat, which would permit assembly of additional fissile material in the core, as well as a radial-implosion assembly, which was much simpler and compact than the
333:. It was hoped that deuterium would fuse (become an active medium) in the secondary's core if compressed appropriately through radiation implosion. The fuel was selected so that UCRL's thermonuclear program would not compete with LASL's on scarce materials at the time, specifically 267: 305:). Optimism in the new lab prompted UCRL to even propose a class of such "small weapons" making use of the material, dubbing it as the "Geode". The "Geode"-type devices would be compact, linear (two-point) implosion, gas-boosted fission weapons using hollow 268: 341:
prototype designed by UCRL at the time. For a hydride-type primary, the degree of compression would not make deuterium to fuse, thus the design would be essentially a pure fission weapon, not a boosted one. The devices themselves as tested in
269: 489:
The idea of cheap thermonuclear fuels was pursued by UCRL with the design of the "Water Boiler", a primitive type of two-stage thermonuclear gadgets and an early design concept of the "Radiator", that would use heavy water solutions of
419:
HE assembly; it was likewise initiated by an XMC-305 betatron fired at known time. Being a sister device to "Hydride I", the "Hydride II" device only had a different pit "fuel" mix, and shared the same dimensions and weight with the
392:, which used deuterium and enriched uranium in a solid spherical pit with a natural uranium tamper, was the first device almost-entirely designed at Livermore; it was fired on March 31, 1953, at 05:00 local time (13:00 GMT) at 494:. They were essentially transferred from LASL to UCRL and follow-up investigations to experiments from 1952 conducted in LASL on behalf of Teller, and shortly before the latter's departure from LASL to the newly fledged UCRL. 271: 234:, strong skepticism arose as the inherently low efficiency of the fuel would not improve even remotely as theoretically envisioned when a hollow core and boosting were incorporated, and a proposed test of such a core in an 313:
producing yields of the order of 10 kt. Applications for this class of devices would be tactical nuclear weapons, as well as primaries for compact thermonuclear systems. The "Geodes" were essentially forerunners of the
229:
physicists continued research on the subject at low priority; while a Monte-Carlo simulation in December 1949 showed that the core could in principle work and result in a weapon considerably smaller than the
424:
test device. It was fired in a cab, atop a 100-foot (30 m) tower on April 11, 1953. Although shot Ray leveled its tower, the yield was a meager 220 tons; while it did better than
68:
The term hydride for this type of weapon has been subject to misunderstandings in the open literature. While "hydride" might imply that natural hydrogen (which is mostly
270: 59:). Bomb efficiency was harmed by the slowing of neutrons since the latter delays the reaction, as delineated by Rob Serber in his 1992 extension of the original 337:. If successful, the devices could also lead to a compact primary containing minimal amount of fissile material, and powerful enough to ignite Ramrod the other 322: 298: 329:
for a spherical deuterated polyethylene charge containing uranium deuteride as a candidate thermonuclear fuel for the "Radiator", an early incarnation of the
415:
event, used deuterium and a different concentration of enriched uranium in its solid spherical pit. The device was called "Hydride II", and it also used a
302: 684: 309:
metallic uranium, or partially ("slightly") moderated cores, where a metallic uranium or plutonium shell was lined internally with UD
697: 462:
The distribution of boron-10 was apparently more useful, and it did away with the earlier and cumbersome "Boron Bubble" scheme.
346:
were experimental systems, not weapon prototypes, and were not designed to be used as weapons, or thermonuclear primaries. The
226: 284: 92: 962: 636: 957: 919: 359: 343: 947: 903: 967: 315: 383: 181: 128: 100: 648: 367: 347: 338: 330: 321:
Two test devices were fielded in 1953 as part of operation Upshot–Knothole. The principal aim of the
239: 73: 69: 47:
in a uranium-deuterium ceramic compact. Unlike all other fission-bomb types, the concept relies on a
732: 471:
hence the name geodes, which usually consist of spheroidal cavities lined internally with crystals.
416: 397: 235: 231: 202: 56: 253:
showing the MK 2 "Elmer" and the MK 8 "Elsie" weapons, depicting the MK 2 (the "good fellow") as
185: 28: 238:
high-explosive assembly was ultimately stricken from the preliminary shot schedule of operation
693: 351: 173: 165: 134: 61: 44: 544: 952: 686:
Critical Assembly: A Technical History of Los Alamos During the Oppenheimer Years, 1943-1945
656: 110: 491: 393: 294: 211: 52: 887: 719: 358:), powder-compacted with deuterated polyethylene. No boron was used. The cores tested in 652: 827: 48: 245: 941: 563: 290: 197: 189: 138: 32: 622: 161:) in one version, and a BeO tamper with 8.45 kg of active material in another. 857: 822: 795: 755: 660: 596: 405: 250: 222: 104: 118:
test. The explosion failed to level the testing tower, only somewhat damaging it.
379: 193: 96: 24: 400:
HE assembly made of Composition B and Baratol explosive lenses, and an XMC-305
306: 153:
C) wax distributed uniformly throughout the solid core. A composite lead and B
363: 157:
C tamper was envisioned, with about 10.5 kg of active material (i.e. UD
36: 401: 214:
forecast that 1 kt of energy would be obtained from about 9 kg of UD
40: 568:
The Los Alamos Primer: The First Lectures on How To Build an Atomic Bomb
334: 206: 77: 428:, the yield was still about a tenth of the predicted 0.5–1 kt value. 480:
The names of the devices all followed the initials of Small Weapons.
921:
Operation Upshot-Knothole Summary Report of the Technical Director
244: 109: 297:
experimented with such devices in the early 1950s at the UCRL, (
83:
Two uranium deuteride bombs are known to have been tested, the
516:
The unclassified name was "Basilisk II" as seen from Francis,
318:
and its derivatives (like the "Swift" and "Swallow" devices).
180:) moderates (slows down) the neutrons, thereby increasing the 76:. Likewise, a "hydrogen bomb" uses deuterium and occasionally 503:
The unclassified name was "Basilisk I" as seen from Francis,
362:
used different "mix" (or enrichment) of uranium moderated by
449:
The unclassified name was "Manticore" as seen from Francis,
861: 799: 759: 600: 374:(with a maximum potential yield of 20 kt) and 0.5-1 kt for 683:
Hoddeson, Lillian; Paul W. Henriksen; et al. (2004).
72:), is used; only deuterium (H) has been used for the bomb 888:
Operation Upshot-Knothole 1953 - Nevada Proving Ground
103:. All other nuclear weapons programs have relied on 678: 676: 826: 95:. Both tests produced a yield comparable to 200 852: 850: 848: 846: 844: 842: 840: 790: 788: 786: 784: 782: 780: 778: 293:remained interested in the concept, and he and 188:. The result should have been a lower required 904:page 2 of archive listing of pdfs. Page 69 of 750: 748: 746: 323:University of California Radiation Laboratory 299:University of California Radiation Laboratory 8: 591: 589: 587: 585: 583: 581: 579: 577: 396:. The explosive device, "Hydride I", used a 289:Skepticism from Los Alamos notwithstanding, 378:. The tests produced yields of about 200 558: 556: 554: 552: 540: 538: 536: 265: 882: 880: 532: 442: 382:each; both tests were considered to be 303:Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 7: 404:was provided for initiation through 31:in 1939 and advocated and tested by 14: 641:Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 411:The second device, tested in the 99:each, and were considered to be 692:. Cambridge University Press. 661:10.1080/00963402.1994.11456528 1: 737:Findings to Trip to L.A. 1944 23:was a variant design of the 984: 325:designs was a preliminary 282: 126: 114:The mangled tower for the 107:in their weapons designs. 720:Operation Upshot-Knothole 635:Moore, Mike (July 1994). 545:Operation Upshot-Knothole 285:Operation Upshot–Knothole 192:; reducing the amount of 149:) and boron-10 carbide (B 93:Operation Upshot–Knothole 894:Retrieved on 2008-05-04. 722:(Nuclear Weapon Archive) 327:nucleonics investigation 892:Nuclear Weapon Archive. 829:Brotherhood of the Bomb 255:clumsy and unattractive 350:consisted of a mix of 280: 258: 119: 274: 248: 201:one destined for the 182:nuclear cross section 129:Nuclear weapon design 113: 963:Deuterated compounds 863:Swords of Armageddon 801:Swords of Armageddon 761:Swords of Armageddon 625:- globalsecurity.org 602:Swords of Armageddon 370:was 1.5 to 3 kt for 339:Mark 22 nuclear bomb 21:uranium hydride bomb 653:1994BuAtS..50d...2M 174:plutonium deuteride 133:In early phases of 57:neutron temperature 27:first suggested by 16:Type of atomic bomb 281: 259: 186:neutron absorption 120: 91:test shots during 29:Robert Oppenheimer 958:Manhattan Project 886:Carey Sublette. " 352:uranium deuteride 272: 166:uranium deuteride 164:The deuterium in 135:Manhattan Project 62:Los Alamos Primer 45:neutron moderator 975: 933: 932: 930: 929: 916: 910: 906:warhead politics 901: 895: 884: 875: 874: 872: 871: 854: 835: 834: 832: 819: 813: 812: 810: 809: 792: 773: 772: 770: 769: 752: 741: 740: 729: 723: 717: 711: 710: 708: 706: 691: 680: 671: 670: 668: 667: 632: 626: 620: 614: 613: 611: 610: 593: 572: 571: 560: 547: 542: 521: 518:Warhead Politics 514: 508: 505:Warhead Politics 501: 495: 487: 481: 478: 472: 469: 463: 460: 454: 451:Warhead Politics 447: 366:. The predicted 273: 39:, an isotope of 983: 982: 978: 977: 976: 974: 973: 972: 948:Nuclear weapons 938: 937: 936: 927: 925: 918: 917: 913: 902: 898: 885: 878: 869: 867: 866:. Vol. VII 856: 855: 838: 821: 820: 816: 807: 805: 804:. Vol. III 794: 793: 776: 767: 765: 754: 753: 744: 731: 730: 726: 718: 714: 704: 702: 700: 689: 682: 681: 674: 665: 663: 634: 633: 629: 621: 617: 608: 606: 595: 594: 575: 562: 561: 550: 543: 534: 525: 524: 515: 511: 502: 498: 492:uranyl fluoride 488: 484: 479: 475: 470: 466: 461: 457: 448: 444: 434: 394:Mercury, Nevada 360:Upshot-Knothole 357: 344:Upshot-Knothole 312: 295:Ernest Lawrence 287: 266: 264: 217: 179: 171: 160: 156: 152: 148: 144: 131: 125: 53:nuclear fission 17: 12: 11: 5: 981: 979: 971: 970: 968:Metal hydrides 965: 960: 955: 950: 940: 939: 935: 934: 911: 896: 876: 836: 814: 774: 764:. Vol. IV 742: 724: 712: 698: 690:(Google Books) 672: 627: 615: 573: 564:Serber, Robert 548: 531: 530: 529: 523: 522: 509: 496: 482: 473: 464: 455: 441: 440: 439: 438: 433: 430: 355: 310: 283:Main article: 263: 260: 215: 177: 169: 158: 154: 150: 146: 142: 124: 121: 49:chain reaction 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 980: 969: 966: 964: 961: 959: 956: 954: 951: 949: 946: 945: 943: 923: 922: 915: 912: 909: 907: 900: 897: 893: 889: 883: 881: 877: 865: 864: 859: 858:Hansen, Chuck 853: 851: 849: 847: 845: 843: 841: 837: 831: 830: 824: 823:Herken, Gregg 818: 815: 803: 802: 797: 796:Hansen, Chuck 791: 789: 787: 785: 783: 781: 779: 775: 763: 762: 757: 756:Hansen, Chuck 751: 749: 747: 743: 738: 734: 733:Conant, James 728: 725: 721: 716: 713: 701: 699:0-521-54117-4 695: 688: 687: 679: 677: 673: 662: 658: 654: 650: 646: 642: 638: 631: 628: 624: 619: 616: 605:. Vol. I 604: 603: 598: 597:Hansen, Chuck 592: 590: 588: 586: 584: 582: 580: 578: 574: 569: 565: 559: 557: 555: 553: 549: 546: 541: 539: 537: 533: 527: 526: 519: 513: 510: 506: 500: 497: 493: 486: 483: 477: 474: 468: 465: 459: 456: 452: 446: 443: 436: 435: 431: 429: 427: 423: 418: 414: 409: 407: 403: 399: 395: 391: 387: 385: 381: 377: 373: 369: 365: 361: 353: 349: 345: 340: 336: 332: 331:"Morgenstern" 328: 324: 319: 317: 308: 304: 300: 296: 292: 291:Edward Teller 286: 278: 261: 256: 252: 249:A cartoon by 247: 243: 241: 237: 233: 228: 224: 219: 213: 208: 204: 199: 195: 191: 190:critical mass 187: 183: 175: 167: 162: 140: 139:pyrophoricity 136: 130: 122: 117: 112: 108: 106: 105:fast neutrons 102: 98: 94: 90: 86: 81: 79: 75: 71: 66: 64: 63: 58: 54: 50: 46: 42: 38: 34: 33:Edward Teller 30: 26: 22: 926:. Retrieved 920: 914: 905: 899: 891: 868:. Retrieved 862: 828: 817: 806:. Retrieved 800: 766:. Retrieved 760: 736: 727: 715: 705:December 15, 703:. Retrieved 685: 664:. Retrieved 644: 640: 637:"Lying well" 630: 618: 607:. Retrieved 601: 567: 517: 512: 504: 499: 485: 476: 467: 458: 450: 445: 425: 421: 412: 410: 406:photofission 389: 388: 375: 371: 326: 320: 288: 276: 275:Film of the 254: 251:George Gamow 220: 212:James Conant 163: 132: 115: 88: 84: 82: 67: 60: 20: 18: 380:tons of TNT 279:detonation. 97:tons of TNT 25:atomic bomb 942:Categories 928:2019-02-17 870:2016-12-28 808:2016-12-28 768:2016-12-28 666:2010-02-07 609:2016-12-28 432:References 307:spheroidal 262:UCRL tests 240:Greenhouse 127:See also: 35:. It used 528:Citations 364:deuterium 37:deuterium 860:(1995). 825:(2003). 798:(1995). 758:(1995). 735:(1944). 647:(4): 2. 599:(1995). 566:(1992). 402:betatron 301:, later 207:inertial 51:of slow 41:hydrogen 953:Uranium 649:Bibcode 384:fizzles 335:lithium 101:fizzles 78:tritium 43:, as a 924:. 1953 696:  316:"Swan" 145:aka UH 123:Theory 437:Notes 368:yield 348:cores 221:Post- 172:) or 141:of UD 55:(see 707:2008 694:ISBN 426:Ruth 422:Ruth 417:MK-6 398:MK-6 390:Ruth 372:Ruth 277:Ruth 236:MK 4 232:MK 5 227:LANL 203:MK 3 184:for 176:(PuD 116:Ruth 87:and 85:Ruth 74:pits 19:The 890:." 657:doi 623:W48 413:Ray 376:Ray 354:(UD 223:war 196:or 168:(UD 89:Ray 944:: 879:^ 839:^ 777:^ 745:^ 675:^ 655:. 645:50 643:. 639:. 576:^ 551:^ 535:^ 386:. 242:. 225:, 218:. 198:Pu 80:. 65:. 931:. 908:. 873:. 833:. 811:. 771:. 739:. 709:. 669:. 659:: 651:: 612:. 570:. 520:. 507:. 453:. 356:3 311:3 257:. 216:3 194:U 178:3 170:3 159:3 155:4 151:4 147:3 143:3 70:H

Index

atomic bomb
Robert Oppenheimer
Edward Teller
deuterium
hydrogen
neutron moderator
chain reaction
nuclear fission
neutron temperature
Los Alamos Primer
H
pits
tritium
Operation Upshot–Knothole
tons of TNT
fizzles
fast neutrons

Nuclear weapon design
Manhattan Project
pyrophoricity
uranium deuteride
plutonium deuteride
nuclear cross section
neutron absorption
critical mass
U
Pu
MK 3
inertial

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑